We’ve heard rumblings of BYD coming to America before, but it seems it won’t be making a big deal of its Stateside entr
Continue reading …Letterman’s monologue-11/15/10 Letterman’s monologue-7/15/09 SJB-GoMoPa-Bennewirtz-Ehlers-Maurischat Cyberstalker-Bande – Ruth Madoff’s Millions Ruth Madoff Must Respond to Suit by Month's End | ThirdAge Bilked investors want to claim $44.8 million of Ruth Madoff’s assets. Ruth Madoff Account Got $14 Million From Fraud | BuzzCrunch Ruth Madoff’s account at Bank of New York Mellon Corp. received “fraudulent” transfers of at least $14 million, said the trustee liquidating her husband Bernard Madoff’s firm, who wants to “recapture” $44.8 million. … I'm Bernard Madoff–I'm Telling All. Right Here. Trust Me … Anyone with more than a third-grade education would conclude from the headline that Bloomberg News is reporting, as a matter of fact, that there currently exists $14 million in an account controlled by Ruth Madoff and domiciled at the … Securities Docket News Wire for March 16, 2011 … Porsche faces new $1 billion lawsuit by hedge funds http://p2.to/19cH #; Picard seeks $14 million transferred by Ruth Madoff http://p2.to/19cG #; Why Wall Street Reform May Already Be Dead – CBS MoneyWatch.com http://p2.to/19cF … Ruth Madoff must respond to suit by months end | Last news of America Ruth Madoff must respond to suit by months end. Posted on March 16, 2011 by writer. Bilked investors want to claim $44.8 million of Ruth Madoffs assets,. A trustee liquidating Bernie and Ruth Madoffs assets claims at least $14 million … yehdesigns says: Ruth Madoff Account Got $14 Million From Fraud http://buswk.co/eqy04J
Continue reading …In America, a 19-year-old can be arrested for killing a hamster —yet we are allowed to inflict great cruelty on animals kept, not as pets, but for food. That’s because of state laws called “Common Farming Exemptions” that allow the industry, instead of lawmakers, to basically define cruelty by making…
Continue reading …The news out of Bahrain is bad— six reported dead in an assault on anti-government protesters today—but this video is worse. The extremely graphic and disturbing footage shows an altercation between a protester and a handful of police, who shoot the man from just a few feet away. New…
Continue reading …Rev. Jeremiah “G-D America” Wright, Barack Obama’s mentor and father figure, was back at the pulpit spewing his Marxist hate-speech recently. The far left hatemonger admitted that Black Liberation Theology was essentially socialism or Marxism. He also told the crowd … Continue reading → Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Gateway Pundit Discovery Date : 16/03/2011 14:37 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …Raymond Davis flown to US airbase after payments made to relatives of men shot dead by intelligence agent in Lahore Raymond Davis, the CIA spy charged with murder in Pakistan, has flown out of the country after the relatives of two men he killed dropped charges in exchange for “blood money” of at least $1.4m (£874,000) and help in resettling abroad. Davis slipped out of Lahore on a special flight from the old city airport after being released from the sprawling jail where he had been held for almost 10 weeks amid a diplomatic storm that rocked relations between the two allies and sucked in President Barack Obama. A Pakistani official said the 36-year-old US spy was bound for an airbase in Afghanistan, then on to the US. Davis was freed under Islamic laws that allow a murderer to walk free on payment of compensation to the family of his victims. The acquittal took place during a closed hearing at Kot Lakhpat jail where no reporters were present. “The court first indicted him, but the families later told the court that they have accepted the blood money and they have pardoned him,” said Rana Sanaullah, the Punjab law minister. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, thanked the families for pardoning Davis and allowing the American to go. Speaking from Cairo, Clinton said the US had not paid to win Davis’s release. The dramatic case has become an obsession in Pakistan since Davis, a bulky former special forces soldier, opened fire on two men at traffic lights on 27 January. Davis claimed he acted in self-defence against robbers, but prosecutors said he shot one in the back as he ran away. Several officials said the men he killed were linked to Pakistani intelligence. The deal to free Davis was an unusual mix of Islamic law and tense backroom negotiations between American and Pakistani spies and diplomats. A senior Pakistani official said the US paid in the region of $700,000 (£436,000) to relatives of both men, while another $700,000 was paid to family of a third man killed by a US rescue vehicle, also presumed to be driven by CIA employees. Washington also undertook to facilitate the future resettlement of family members in the US or a Gulf state such as Dubai, the official added. “The Americans will be helpful to the families,” he said. But the deal was also a defeat for US diplomacy, which had insisted Davis was a bona fide diplomat who enjoyed immunity from prosecution. In the early stage of the controversy, the US accused Pakistan of “illegally detaining” Davis, while Obama defended him as “our diplomat”. The carefully orchestrated legal events in Lahore belied weeks of negotiations between the CIA and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), which have been at barely concealed loggerheads over the incident. The legal manoeuvres were “a fig leaf”, one official admitted. The idea of a payment was first mooted between Pakistan’s ambassador to the US, Husain Haqqani, and Senator John Kerry in February. But the arrangement first needed the co-operation of Pakistani intelligence, which seemed determined to press its advantage. Relations between the two spy agencies had been fragile for months. In December the CIA station chief had to leave Islamabad after being named in the press; ISI officials were angry that their chief, General Shuja Pasha, had been named in a New York lawsuit brought by victims of the 2008 Mumbai attacks. The ISI had been unaware of Davis’s CIA role in Pakistan, where he was employed to protect operatives gathering information about groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, a militant Islamist group close to Pakistan’s intelligence service and linked to terrorist attacks against India, and relations between the CIA and ISI were strained as a result. The CIA director, Leon Panetta, phoned the ISI chief, General Shuja Pasha, last month to try to smooth relations. Media leaks in the Pakistani press during the stop-start trial kept the pressure on the US, such as the publication last weekend of the names and passport details of other “Raymonds” – Americans suspected of entering Pakistan under false pretences – in a newspaper. The report quoted “official sources”. In return for Davis’s release, the ISI has obtained an undertaking from the CIA about covert operations on their turf, the Pakistani official said. “They will do nothing behind our backs that will result in people getting killed or arrested.” There were other indications that a deal had been worked out. The US embassy press release welcoming Davis’s release was initially dated March 10 – around the same time a deal was struck in Washington. Analysts also noted that General Pasha, who was due to retire this month, obtained an unusual one-year extension of tenure this week. Kerry, head of the Senate foreign affairs committee, who is often used as a go-between in difficult issues, is thought to have raised the issue of compensation with the Pakistan government on a visit to Islamabad on 16 February. Kerry’s visit, devoted to securing Davis’s release, was initially believed to have been a failure. But US officials have been working behind the scenes since then at trying to secure the deal. Kerry said: “This was a very important and necessary step for both of our countries to be able to maintain our relationship and remain focused on progress on bedrock national interests, and I’m deeply grateful for the Pakistani government’s decision. “We deeply regret the loss of life that led to this difficulty in our relationship and the demonstrations on Pakistan’s streets, but neither country could afford for this tragedy to derail our vital relationship. We look forward to working with Pakistan to strengthen our relationship and confront our common challenges.” The US state department released a statement by the US ambassador to Pakistan, Cameron Munter, who accompanied Davis on the flight from Pakistan to Afghanistan. Munter thanked the families of their victims for pardoning Davis. “I am grateful for their generosity.” He stressed that the US justice department has opened an investigation into the shooting in Lahore. He added: “Most of all, I wish to reaffirm the importance that America places in its relationship with Pakistan, and the commitment of the American people to work with their Pakistani counterparts to move ahead in ways that will benefit us all.” As night fell in Lahore, there was a small protest outside the US consulate where Davis claimed to work, led by demonstrators from the Jamaat-e-Islami, the country’s main religious party. Further protests are expected after prayers on Friday. Meanwhile, the CIA continued drone strikes in the tribal belt, firing three missiles at a car in North Waziristan that reportedly killed five people. It was the 16th drone strike in Pakistan this year. CIA United States Pakistan Declan Walsh Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The Hill has an article with some interesting information about what the ConservaDems and anti-American-workers faction of the Obama administration want to do with Social Security as the budget fights move along. The Hill: Social Security reform is splitting President Obama’s economic and political advisers. Obama is being pulled in opposite directions by those whose priorities are fiscal and those whose No. 1 concern is electoral Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, National Economic Council Director Gene Sperling and Sperling’s deputy, Jason Furman — leading figures in the president’s economic team — are pressing Obama to cut Social Security benefits if necessary, say sources familiar with their positions. But Obama’s political team, led by David Axelrod, David Plouffe and Jim Messina, are urging the president to understand that backing benefit cuts could prove disastrous to his 2012 reelection hopes, sources say. The political team is winning the argument so far, but internal debate rages at the White House as Republicans in Congress insist sweeping efforts to restore government finances must include Social Security reform. “Gene Sperling and Jason Furman and some of the Treasury people started with the posture that we’re the best people to reform Social Security — that was when the Democrats had a majority in both houses of Congress,” said a Democratic policy expert who has met Obama’s economic policy team over the past two years. “The same people have continued to make that argument even as they’re now responding to conservatives who are stronger in the Congress,” the source, who strongly opposes benefits cuts, told The Hill. “There are two camps,” the source added. “One camp wants to be able to throw a bone to Republicans and some [centrist] Democrats. “The political people would prefer not to be accused of being the party that cuts Social Security in those ways. Some political people would like to see the president out there defending the program and making the case that it has nothing to do with the deficit.”… read on I label anyone who wants to cut benefits from Social Security anti-working-class family , so if this article is correct, then Geithner and that crew of “centrists” can go screw themselves. There is no problem with Social Security. Why would anyone with a D in front of their name want to cut benefits? It’s nuts. Every poll shows quite clearly that even Republican voters do not want a cut in these benefits. If Sperling’s argument is about reforming Social Security and Medicare without taking away from them, then OK, but that’s not what I’m reading here. Do these creatures only listen to Villager gasbags that want working class Americans to be the only people to share the sacrifice and suffer in America after Wall Streeters and their partners caused the Great Recession? You can always count on Jonathan Chait to play the Beltway bipartisan fetish card: There’s a benefit in bashing Republicans for going after Social Security. But that assumes they do go after Social Security, which, despite all their rhetoric, is far from certain. I’d argue that, politically speaking, obtaining a bipartisan deal on the deficit is likely to be popular. While the specifics of cutting entitlements are extremely unpopular, the general meta-message of bipartisan cooperation is highly popular. And people tend to follow the broad heuristics of whether the parties are getting along rather than the specifics, which is why the health care law, whose policies were mostly very popular, was so unpopular. Americans do like some bipartisan agreements, but not when it comes to cutting entitlements like Social Security and Medicare. It would be political suicide for President Obama to agree to any type of cuts because of some ‘can’t we all just get along” idiocy, and his base will not forget it. Americans will not stand for it either. Let’s be clear about something else that Geithner doesn’t understand: Republicans who support cutting benefits for the Working Joe will never give Obama any credit for doing the wrong thing either. The partisan breakdown of the results shows that Republicans, Democrats and independents agree that cutting Social Security is the least acceptable option of the three presented in the poll. It came in third among all respondents who made a choice. The President needs to stand strong against the Republicans’ call for for a government shutdown over the debt ceiling and insane budget cuts. If Obama’s team is really looking for new ways to fire up the base, then this ain’t one of them. For now, the Obama team is unveiling few new ideas specifically keyed to firing up core constituencies. A recent White House conference call urged young voters to hold roundtables, which administration officials may attend, to discuss priorities and offer feedback. President Obama has become a rallying point for Conservatives, so If Republicans do gain all the power in 2012 and then proceed to cut the programs, all hell will break loose. A Democratic President can never propose such an idea, especially when a program like Social Security is NOT in trouble.
Continue reading …World War I – Once I Was Frank Buckles Greets Liberty Bell Tribute to Frank Buckles, America’s Last World War I Veteran Last World War I Veteran Frank Buckles Laid To Rest (VIDEO) ARLINGTON, Va. — A small crowd of tourists, grizzled veterans and junior ROTC students stood across from the gravesite as the roar of rolling thunder — passing motorcyclists — went quiet on a nearby hillside. PhotoBlog – Last World War I vet, Frank Buckles , lies in state at … Army Corporal Frank Buckles , the last American veteran of World War One, lies in state at the Memorial Amphitheater Chapel at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia on March 15. Buckles passed away onFebruary 27 at his West … Obama Foodorama: Obama Pays Last Respects To Frank Buckles “ Frank Buckles lived the American Century. Like so many veterans, he returned home, continued his education, began a career, and along with his late wife Audrey, raised their daughter Susannah.” While the Pres ident’s visit to Arlington … Last World War I Veteran Frank Buckles Laid To Rest | Matthew's … Last World War I Veteran Frank Buckles Laid To Rest. by Andrea Stone on Mar 15, 2011 • 9:37 pm No Comments. ARLINGTON, Va. — A small crowd of tourists, grizzled veterans and junior ROTC students stood across from the gravesite as the … Frank Buckles , The last American survivor of the First World War … LAST OF HIS KIND: The casket of Frank Buckles lay in a chapel at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia Tuesday. Mr. Buckles, the last surviving American World War I veteran, died in February in West Virginia at age 110. … POPinDC says: RT @AlexNoVaHistory : Frank Buckles , last-known U.S. World War I veteran, is laid to rest at Arlington – The Washington Post http://t.co/BWxGocw
Continue reading …As NewsBusters reported in February, vulgarian comedienne Kathy Griffin was cast to do a guest stint on the hit series “Glee” portraying a Palinesque Tea Partier. The advanced billing turned out better than the reality, for on Tuesday's show, Griffin mocked Palin and Christine O'Donnell while depicting Tea Party members as homophobic birthers (video follows with transcript and commentary): KATHY GRIFFIN AS TAMMY JEAN ALBERTSON, TWITTERER AND FORMER TEA PARTY CANDIDATE: Before we start, I would like to say I am not a witch. But, um, I think it's fair to ask: Do we have written proof that these kids were born in the United States of America? LORETTA DEVINE AS SISTER MARY CONSTANCE, NUN AND FORMER EXOTIC DANCER: For a nun, I'm pretty liberal. But I'm barely a nun. In fact, I just joined because I needed a place to live. GRIFFIN: Bless you! DEVINE: The convent is the one place I knew I could stay off the pole. But my question is this: That Dalton Academy, is it a gay school, or is it just a school that appears gay? BILL A. JONES AS ROD REMINGTON, GADABOUT: Could I add a dash of Rod to this lady soup? My hairdresser is a gay, and for fifteen years, he's been with his partner, also a hairdresser. I see no reason why they shouldn't be allowed to marry and raise a family of beautiful wigs. DEVINE: I liked the duet the two boys from Dalton sang. GRIFFIN: Oh, boys shouldn't do a duet. The last thing we need to do is send a message to children that “Gay is okay.” It is not a legitimate lifestyle, and last time I checked, it's not in the Constitution. JONES: What about that song about Jesus? GRIFFIN: Well, that should win. DEVINE: Uh, uh, uh. No, no, no, no. Now, that is just cheap pandering. I didn't even like to be pandered to when I was a stripper! JONES: Those New Directions had it going on. Those songs were fresh. GRIFFIN: Those songs were terrible. I am sorry, but I'm a politician, and when I lost my last election — and there will be a recount — I didn't go around singing about being a loser. I twittered that Obama is a terrorist. DEVINE: Oh, no, you didn't! GRIFFIN: I had to. It's a fact. DEVINE: Oh, oh, gee. JONES: Okay, ladies, I've heard enough. Let's vote. Once again as full disclosure, I'm a big fan of this show. However, the writers and producers took a lot of shots at conservatives and religion in this episode that are likely to further alienate right-leaning viewers. In just this one and a half minute segment alone, numerous disgraceful stereotypes of the Tea Party were shamefully displayed for millions of folks tuning in for some light-hearted entertainment with hopefully some redeeming social commentary. The producers even went out of their way to make sure that everyone knew Griffin's character was a Tea Partier by doing a still-frame shot announcing as much: Was that necessary? Next came the Catholic bashing by introducing a nun that was a former exotic dancer: Was making a mockery of nuns specifically designed to further alienate religious conservatives? And how about the entire homophobic discussion between these three judges? Certainly, it was no coincidence that a Tea Partier and a nun exhibiting such fears took place in the same show that gay characters Kurt and Blaine (Chris Colfer and Darren Criss) had their first kiss. Less obvious might have been more subtle jabs at prominent conservatives. Griffin's “Obama is a terrorist” comment might have been a swipe at Ann Coulter who in June 2007 was accused by numerous left-wing websites of saying this during an interview with Fox News's Sean Hannity. The homosexuality is “not in the Constitution” remark might have been aimed at Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia for his September 2010 comments about the 14th amendment not protecting women and gays from discrimination. Add it all up, and the folks involved in this episode seemed to be going out of their way to offend the Right Tuesday evening. As a fan of this program since the pilot was first aired almost two years ago, I am very disappointed. This show has been groundbreaking in a lot of ways, and indeed has offered some social commentary that's stretched the boundaries of decency and good-taste at times, but also does what I think is an admirable job of portraying some of the realities facing American teenagers in the year 2011. Without question, it is at times done with an in your face style that as NewsBusters has reported is often way too overtly sexual for a show about high school students airing at 8 PM on a broadcast network. But this was the first episode where I felt the folks involved were going all out to ridicule a good percentage of America – including me. Even sadder, this segment happened moments after the female lead sang a heartfelt song about her feelings for the male lead, which was followed by her fellow singers performing a marvelous number about the villain in the show. In the end, the glee club protagonists may have come in first in the fictitious competition they performed at Tuesday evening, but this episode – which at times seemed a cross between MSNBC and NPR – is sure to be considered a loser by right-thinking people across the fruited plain.
Continue reading …No one can fairly accuse whoever wrote the Tuesday evening report on 2010 newspaper industry revenue of looking through rose-colored glasses. The same cannot be said of John F. Sturm, President and CEO of the Newspaper Association of America, whose press release today reads as follows: Quarter after quarter, newspaper advertising has shown signs of a continued turnaround and an essential repositioning. Buoyed by online growth and moderating print declines, these figures point to a continually improving advertising environment for newspapers, with encouraging trends as we progress further into 2011. Online revenues increased 14 percent in last year’s fourth quarter, with 12 percent of all newspaper ad revenues generated from digital platforms.
Continue reading …