Home » Posts tagged with » america (Page 112)

It’s been five months since the public got a clear view of Gabrielle Giffords, and she’s looking pretty good for someone who nearly died: Photos released on her Facebook page today show the congresswoman smiling, her hair cropped short, with no sign of the gunshot she took to the head….

Continue reading …
Chris Wallace to Pawlenty: Your economic plan won’t work without tax increases

Click here to view this media Republican presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty struggled to come up with an answer Sunday after a Fox News host pointed out that the five percent growth required by his economic plan has only historically come after tax increases. In a speech at the University of Chicago Tuesday, Pawlenty revealed an economic plan that gives big tax cuts to wealthy Americans and corporations while requiring growth that is historically unlikely. “You say you can pay for the tax cuts because the economy is going to grow by five percent over the next decade,” Fox News’ Chris Wallace noted. “Governor, question: Since the United States began measuring GDP — basically the growth of the economy — in 1929, when have we ever had 10 consecutive years of five percent growth as you project in your plan?” “Well, this is an aspiration,” Pawlenty explained. “It’s a big goal and it’s a stretch goal… I don’t buy into the declinist view and attitude of President Obama that we are going to settle for anemic growth or average growth or America is going to be a laggard. We are going to lead the world economically and all other respects.” He continued: “We have achieved five percent growth twice in recent history of this country. Once under Reagan, once under Clinton. Now, was it sustained for 10 years in those circumstances? No.” “Is it declinist to doubt the five percent number or is it just realist to doubt the five percent number?” Wallace asked. “You talk about the fact that for a few years in the 80s and a few years in the 90s that we did have average 5 percent growth — or close to it, it was 4 point something. But the fact is, the difference is, in both of those occasions that was coming directly out of a recession, not after a year, a year into a weak recovery. And actually, in both of those cases, it came after a tax increase, not a tax cut.” “But Chris, as I said, this is an aspirational goal… of course the conservatives like the plan, President Obama and the liberals don’t. That’s predictable,” Pawlenty said. “That’s not quite fair,” Wallace interrupted. “There are a lot of conservative who doubt the number. And if you don’t get your five percent growth — which you now say is just aspirational — then it means an even bigger deficit.” The Washington Post ‘s Glenn Kessler noted that while both Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton had years of near five percent growth, their average over eight years was only about 3.5 percent. “The last president to achieve consistent growth above 5 percent was John F. Kennedy a half-century ago, when the baby-boom generation was on the verge of entering the workforce,” Kessler wrote. “Now, that generation is heading into retirement, leaving fewer workers to carry the burden.” “This plan isn’t optimistic,” The Washington Post ‘s Ezra Klein wrote Tuesday . “It isn’t a bit vague. It’s a joke.” “I don’t know which is worse: The thought that Pawlenty knows that and went forward with this pandering, fantasy-based proposal anyway, or the thought that he doesn’t know it, and he really thinks this could work.”

Continue reading …
Amy Holmes: ‘Media Needs to Go to Rehab With Weiner and Get Over Obsession With Palin’

Amy Holmes of America's Radio News Network made a fabulous observation Sunday concerning the New York Times and the Washington Post asking readers to go through Sarah Palin's email messages to assist them in finding dirt on the former governor. Appearing on CNN's “Reliable Sources,” Holmes marvelously concluded, “The media it seemed to me it was like they were putting out an 'America’s Most Wanted' tipline to try to find something to try to nail Sarah Palin…I think the media needs to go to rehab with Anthony Weiner and get over their obsession with this woman” (video follows with transcript and commentary): HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: But because so many journalists went to Alaska – CNN sent somebody, MSNBC sent Mike Isikoff – they almost were invested in having to do stories to justify the initial expense. AMY HOLMES, AMERICA’S RADIO NEWS NETWORK: Right, I think that's true. Someone described it as if they were, you know, trying to record the moon landing with all of this. It's just totally ridiculous. I think it was as disgraceful as it was ludicrous. And no, the media does not do this to other politicians like President Obama with this feeding frenzy and sending everybody everywhere to try to get the media try to get the public involved. DANA MILBANK, WASHINGTON POST: If he released private emails, I’d even go into the office for that. HOLMES: These were not private emails. This was a FOIA request for government emails. HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: Right, these were state government… HOLMES: Right. This is absurd. She’s not even… KURTZ: But why disgraceful? HOLMES: …she's not an elected politician. She is not sitting in office. She hasn't even yet, if she's going to, thrown her hat into the ring to run for President of the United States or the United States Senate from Arizona. KURTZ: Why was this a disgraceful exercise by the media? HOLMES: The media it seemed to me it was like they were putting out an “America’s Most Wanted” tipline to try to find something to try to nail Sarah Palin. All we found out from this is that she wanted a tanning bed. This is ridiculous, and I think the media needs to go to rehab with Anthony Weiner and get over their obsession with this woman. KURTZ: Alright, you've got your marching orders. Find a clinic for yourselves. Kurtz should be advised that if he wants suggestions for clinics or which media members should be admitted, we would be more than happy to assist his research efforts. We've even got videos to back up our recommendations.

Continue reading …
Amy Holmes: ‘Media Needs to Go to Rehab With Weiner and Get Over Obsession With Palin’

Amy Holmes of America's Radio News Network made a fabulous observation Sunday concerning the New York Times and the Washington Post asking readers to go through Sarah Palin's email messages to assist them in finding dirt on the former governor. Appearing on CNN's “Reliable Sources,” Holmes marvelously concluded, “The media it seemed to me it was like they were putting out an 'America’s Most Wanted' tipline to try to find something to try to nail Sarah Palin…I think the media needs to go to rehab with Anthony Weiner and get over their obsession with this woman” (video follows with transcript and commentary): HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: But because so many journalists went to Alaska – CNN sent somebody, MSNBC sent Mike Isikoff – they almost were invested in having to do stories to justify the initial expense. AMY HOLMES, AMERICA’S RADIO NEWS NETWORK: Right, I think that's true. Someone described it as if they were, you know, trying to record the moon landing with all of this. It's just totally ridiculous. I think it was as disgraceful as it was ludicrous. And no, the media does not do this to other politicians like President Obama with this feeding frenzy and sending everybody everywhere to try to get the media try to get the public involved. DANA MILBANK, WASHINGTON POST: If he released private emails, I’d even go into the office for that. HOLMES: These were not private emails. This was a FOIA request for government emails. HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: Right, these were state government… HOLMES: Right. This is absurd. She’s not even… KURTZ: But why disgraceful? HOLMES: …she's not an elected politician. She is not sitting in office. She hasn't even yet, if she's going to, thrown her hat into the ring to run for President of the United States or the United States Senate from Arizona. KURTZ: Why was this a disgraceful exercise by the media? HOLMES: The media it seemed to me it was like they were putting out an “America’s Most Wanted” tipline to try to find something to try to nail Sarah Palin. All we found out from this is that she wanted a tanning bed. This is ridiculous, and I think the media needs to go to rehab with Anthony Weiner and get over their obsession with this woman. KURTZ: Alright, you've got your marching orders. Find a clinic for yourselves. Kurtz should be advised that if he wants suggestions for clinics or which media members should be admitted, we would be more than happy to assist his research efforts. We've even got videos to back up our recommendations.

Continue reading …

In America’s melting pot of food culture, few ingredients have been as broadly assimilated as the tomato. Whether it’s ketchup, marinara, salsa, or just fodder for salads, our country’s demand for the tomato is extreme. But as journalist Barry Estabrook says in an interview with Salon , America’s love for the…

Continue reading …

The Google Doodle guitar tribute to Les Paul has proven so popular that Google is keeping it available permanently, reports Mashable . The playable gizmo now has its own standalone site here where fans can pluck away. Thousands of songs already have shown up on YouTube, including Stairway to Heaven . PC…

Continue reading …
Return of the Rainbow Warrior

The 1985 bombing of the Rainbow Warrior made the converted fishing trawler a campaigning icon. Now, in its 40th anniversary year, Greenpeace is launching its first purpose-built protest ship – one of the most technologically advanced vessels to set sail The secretive shipyards of Bremen in northern Germany are the places where Russian oligarchs and Silicon Valley billionaires go to have their fantasies (and insecurities) made into yachts. In a hangar at the yard of Fassmer on the banks of the River Weser, however, a different kind of £16m dream boat is taking shape. It is a dream that began more than 25 years ago, when Greenpeace’s Rainbow Warrior was sunk in Auckland Harbour by bombs planted by the French secret service. The determination then, from environmental activists across the globe, was that “you can’t sink a Rainbow”. In the years since, Greenpeace has become perhaps the world’s most recognisable and sophisticated global eco-charity. Its ships, however – converted trawlers and gas guzzlers – have never quite lived up to its green aspirations. That is where the dream comes in. The new Rainbow Warrior III, which I had come to Bremen to get a first look at, will be among the most environmentally advanced ships of its size at sea. The boat – “don’t call it a yacht!” I’m told – is nearly 60m long and currently cased in scaffolding, though the distinctive dove of peace and childlike red-and-yellow- and-pink-and-green rainbow is visible on its hull. At the beginning of next month, when the ship is baptised, twin 50-metre masts will be hoisted on its deck to carry 1,200 sq m of sail. A state-of-the-art hybrid engine will be needed for only about 10% of its operational power. Everything about it, from the paintwork to the insulation, has been designed with sustainability in mind. Each component comes with transparent ethical sourcing. Below deck the ship will house one of the most sophisticated communications operations anywhere on the ocean. As well as all this up-to-the-minute kit, the boat is required to have something that is not mentioned in the hundreds of pages of specification: a soul. This particular tricky fixture is very much rooted in its history. On one level Rainbow Warrior III is the inspired result of some of the latest thinking in sailboat technology from world-leading – mainly Dutch – computer modellers and wind-tunnel obsessives. On another it is the latest fulfilment of an old Native American prophecy: “There will come a time when the earth grows sick, and when it does a tribe will gather from all the cultures of the world who believe in deeds and not words. They will work to heal it… they will be known as the ‘Warriors of the Rainbow’.” There are various sources for that prophecy, which spread among early environmentalists when it was published in a book of Hopi Indian and Cree legends in California in 1962. But 15 years later, when Greenpeace activists in the UK came up with the idea of taking a ship to bear witness to some of the more blatant acts of ecological destruction – from whaling and oil exploration to nuclear testing and industrial fishing – that were occurring in the remote oceans, there was only one name that could do it justice. The Aberdeen-built trawler the Sir William Hardy” was almost ready for scrap when it was bought by Greenpeace for £40,000. After a refit and hand-painting of the famous logo on its bow, it first sailed out along the Thames on 15 May 1978. The first Rainbow Warrior had been making headlines (and trouble for corporations and governments) successfully for seven years when, on a mission to disrupt French nuclear testing in the South Pacific, it was infamously sunk in Auckland harbour by two bombs attached to its hull by French secret agents. One Greenpeace crew member, the photographer Fernando Pereira, was killed, having gone below deck after the first explosion to try to retrieve his cameras. The story quickly became a defining legend, not just of Greenpeace but of environmental activism in general. This history seemed very present as I walked around the half-finished decks of the new boat, where German engineers were efficiently welding together the latest incarnation of the mythology. The Rainbow Warrior III project is being overseen in Bremen by William Sykes, a 6ft 6in Glaswegian second-row forward, who points out to me some of the ship’s more unusual features – the advanced technology that will drop smaller inflatable speedboats from its sides at record speed for the quickest possible advance or getaway; the helicopter pad that can be created on deck; the below-deck radio room with its reinforced door built to allow at least 30 minutes transmission time in the event of the ship being boarded – as it has been in the past – by SAS-style commandos wielding axes. When it first embarked on the commissioning of the ship, Greenpeace canvassed staff at its 40 global offices to come up with a list of “wants and needs” for the project. As Ulrich von Eitzen, Greenpeace’s operations director, explains, “You can imagine that the wish list we got was quite a long one.” From it was developed a functional specification of 12 closely typed pages. One of the more insistent requirements, particularly from long-term crew members with the scent of old voyages to the Arctic or up the Amazon still vivid, was for a shower in each double cabin, as opposed to the scant communal facilities that had characterised previous boats. Keen attention was also paid to both the galley facilities and the sewage arrangements. As Sykes observes with a degree of pride, it is down to him to “get 10lb of shit into a 2lb bag”. His current focus in that mission is on 10 July when, having left its dry dock and been floated for the first time, the huge A-frame masts will be slotted into the ship’s deck. The date has a powerful significance: it’s the 26th anniversary of the bombing of the first Rainbow Warrior. Those who were on board that night have been following the progress of the new ship with a sense of expectation. When I phoned Peter Willcox, the captain in 1985, he was on board a yacht near his home in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. He has worked as a skipper for Greenpeace for 30 years, at sea for six months of most of them. He has been distantly involved with the plans for the new Warrior, but mostly, he says wryly, “they seemed happy to keep me about 4,000 miles away”. Once the Rainbow Warrior III has done a European tour of duty at the end of the year, and given supporters a chance to see what their £10 a month has helped to pay for, Willcox will join it in the Azores in January and take the helm to America. He will then sail it up the Amazon, on its maiden campaign, as part of the protest against deforestation. He still relives the day 26 years ago when he had to give the fateful shout to abandon ship. “One particularly moving thing for me,” he says “was the 20th anniversary of the bombing, when I got to meet Marelle Pereira – Fernando’s daughter. She is a remarkable woman who has gone through hell as a result of losing her father.” That anniversary was marked by the arrival of Rainbow Warrior II at Auckland and a special Maori ceremony. The second Rainbow Warrior, a recycled ship that went into service four years after the sinking, these days spends more time out of the water than in it and, at 52 years old, is about to be retired. Willcox, at 58, has no such plans. Things have changed over the years at Greenpeace, but one thing has not altered: “The atmosphere on the boats isn’t very different . There is still a group of people bound by a similar goal.” The job allows him to see the wonders of the planet as well as the way we abuse them. “The most memorable trip was a couple of years ago, going up to Greenland to do climate-change research,” he says. “We were up north of 80 degrees for seven weeks, kayaking in ice melt.” After that he was monitoring the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico – “just depressing”. Willcox is an optimist, but over the 30 years he has never felt as though they were winning. “Greenpeace may be taken more seriously than it was 40 years ago, but that’s partly because the planet is on its knees.” Still, he can’t wait to get out on Rainbow Warrior III, not least because “Greenpeace running around in big polluting motor vessels is not ideal. It is good to see us get serious about alternative technology, because if we don’t, how can we expect anyone else to?” For David Edward, a Yorkshireman who was engineer on the boat in 1985, there is a great feeling of continuity. Edward is now in charge of all Greenpeace vessels at sea, but he is closely watching progress in Bremen. For him, the bombing was the point at which Greenpeace grew up as an organisation. “I think it was a springboard for Greenpeace International. It made us even more determined,” he says. “But also lawyers are now a big part of Greenpeace.” For a long while after the first Rainbow Warrior was raised, Edward thought it should be repaired. Eventually, though, it became clear that the ship was going to be scuttled so he felt he should get back to his family in Yorkshire. Getting out for sea trials on the new boat in the coming months will feel like another sort of homecoming. “For me, it’s the closing of a circle,” he says. “When we were in New Zealand with the old Warrior, after the bombing, I would go round schools and kids would hand me pocket money to help us build a new ship. I like to think that that money has finally helped to pay for this new boat.” Of course Rainbow Warrior III has to be as much about the future as about the past. Everyone I speak to at Greenpeace talks about getting the balance right between the size of the organisation and the need to put all the energy not into bureaucracy but the sharp end of campaigning. Rainbow Warrior III encapsulates this balance. Greenpeace is not a homemade anarchic kind of concern any more, it is a sophisticated lobbying network, but it still wants to be at the cutting end of environmental defence. “One thing this boat says very clearly,” Ulrich von Eizen maintains, “is that we are still out there. At this very moment we have crews out on an oil rig trying to stop Arctic offshore drilling. We haven’t changed our attitude, and we will not be silenced.” Though Rainbow Warrior has a proud history, he suggests, the boat in Bremen is not an exercise in nostalgia. “Rainbow Warrior is a strong name. But 20-year-olds don’t necessarily know anything about it. This is not about preserving our past victories, it’s about the future. To keep on bearing witness.” The Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, 10 June 1985 By Steve Sawyer, former campaign leader on the ship The day of the bombing was my birthday. I was 29. And I guess it is the day I really grew up. All the talk about standing up for what you believe in became different after Fernando Pereira was killed on the Rainbow Warrior. I was interviewed immediately afterwards and asked if I thought the French had done it and I said I really didn’t believe they would do something so stupid. That aired Sunday night. And then on Monday morning they arrested the French spies who had planted the bombs, masquerading as a Swiss honeymooning couple. So you learn. After that I spent five or six years dealing with the court case, then became American director of Greenpeace and then international director. But that night stays with me. Having celebrated my birthday, I had gone off about 20 minutes before midnight to stay in a hotel across town, where I was meant to have a meeting the next day. We had just broken open a bottle of rum that I’d had for my birthday and were playing a game of pool, and the woman from the hotel said there was a phone call for me. It was a woman from Greenpeace New Zealand, who said there had been a fire and an explosion on the boat. So we piled into a car and drove back across town. The dock was cordoned off and the crew were across the street at the police station. I saw Chris Robinson, one of our skippers, who told me, “They blew up the boat and killed Fernando.” It took us some time to convince the police of those facts. They thought they were looking at a bunch of hippies with a big green boat. Their first reaction was, “How are you going to get your ship off the bottom of our harbour?” It was only when the divers went down the next day and found that the explosion had blown in and not out that the attitude of the police changed. The thing I remember most, though, was that we set up an office to try to deal with stuff and that afternoon people started arriving. Someone brought bags of clothes for us. Other stuff started coming. Someone set up a little kitchen in the office to feed the crew. Then people came with buckets of cash for us that they had collected on the street. They were giving, they said, for us to build a new boat. To keep on going. If you would like to make a donation towards Rainbow Warrior III go to greenpeace.org.uk/rainbow-warrior Greenpeace Activism Ethical and green living Tim Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Salman Rushdie says TV drama series have taken the place of novels

Booker-prizewinning novelist to write sci-fi drama for television, citing The Wire, The Sopranos and Mad Men as an inspiration Salman Rushdie is to make a sci-fi television series in the belief that quality TV drama has taken over from film and the novel as the best way of widely communicating ideas and stories. “It’s like the best of both worlds,” said the novelist in an interview with the Observer . “You can work in movie style productions, but have proper control.” The new work, to be called The Next People is being made for Showtime, a US cable TV network. The plot will be based in factual science, Rushdie said, but will contain elements of the supernatural or extra-terrestrial. Although filming is yet to begin, a pilot has been commissioned and written. It will have what Rushdie described as “an almost feature-film budget”. Showtime has announced that the hour-long drama will deal with the fast pace of change in modern life, covering the areas of politics, religion, science, technology and sexuality. “It’s a sort of paranoid science-fiction series, people disappearing and being replaced by other people,” said Rushdie, 63, best known for Midnight’s Children and The Satanic Verses . “It’s not exactly sci-fi, in that there is not an awful lot of science behind it, but there are certainly elements which are not naturalistic,” he said in the interview, which will appear in full in the Observer later this month. The idea that Rushdie might create a television show came from his US agents who suggested that he would have more creative influence than with a feature-film script. “They said to me that what I should really think about is a TV series, because what has happened in America is that the quality – or the writing quality – of movies has gone down the plughole. “If you want to make a $300m special effects movie from a comic book, then fine. But if you want to make a more serious movie… I mean you have no idea how hard it was to raise the money for Midnight’s Children .” Deepa Mehta, an Oscar-nominated director, is currently making a film version of Rushdie’s 1981 Booker Prize winning novel, under the title Winds of Change , that will be co-scripted by the author. “I’m in this position where, for the first time in my writing life, I don’t have a novel on the go, but I have a movie and a memoir and a TV series,” said Rushdie, who is working on an account of the most famous and troubled era of his life – the period when his 1988 novel The Satanic Verses put him at the centre of a dangerous international controversy. In 1989, Tehran radio broadcast a fatwa, or religious edict, from the Ayatollah Khomeini, the spiritual leader of Iran, which called the book blasphemous and put a price on the author’s head. Rushdie lived through the next decade in hiding. The former advertising copywriter’s first novel Grimus , was partly science fiction and his novels since have often been described as examples of the vivid literary school of “magical realism”. Rushdie agreed that “my writing has always had elements of the fantastical” but said that he was drawn to television by the comparatively high status of the writer in the process. “In the movies the writer is just the servant, the employee. In television, the 60-minute series, The Wire and Mad Men and so on, the writer is the primary creative artist. “You have control in the way that you never have in the cinema. The Sopranos was David Chase, West Wing was Aaron Sorkin,” he explained. Rushdie said that he is also considering doing much of the writing for an ensuing series alone. “Matthew Wiener on Mad Men writes the entire series before they start shooting, and if you have that, then what you can do with character and story is not at all unlike what you can do in a novel.” The Next People is being made by Working Title, the film company behind many of the most successful British Films of the last 20 years from Four Weddings and A Funeral to Bean, Shaun of the Dead and the Nanny McPhee films. Rushdie has written the first draft of the script and will executive-produce the show, alongside British producers Tim Bevan, Eric Fellner and Shelley McCrory, the former NBC executive who runs the company’s TV projects. Salman Rushdie US television Vanessa Thorpe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Al-Qaida bomber Fazul Abdullah Mohammed killed

Terrorist was behind the 1998 attacks on two embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed hundreds of people The terrorist behind the 1998 bombings of two American embassies in East Africa – the attack that brought al-Qaida to global attention – has been killed in Somalia. Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, who had a $5m price tag put on his head by American authorities, was one of the most wanted Islamist militants in the world. The embassy attacks – in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam in Tanzania – killed more than 200 people and injured several thousand. The majority of the casualties were local African staff or passersby caught in the multiple explosions that destroyed the buildings. Mohammed also organised the 2002 attacks on two Israeli targets, including the bombing of an Israeli-owned hotel in Kenya, which killed 13 people, and an attempt to shoot down a passenger plane on a flight to Israel. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, who was on a visit to Tanzania as news of the death broke, described the killing as a “significant blow to al-Qaida, its extremist allies, and its operations in east Africa”. “It is a just end for a terrorist who brought so much death and pain to so many innocents in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam and elsewhere – Tanzanians, Kenyans, Somalis and our own embassy personnel,” she said. A senior American official in Washington said that his killing removed one of the group’s “most experienced operational planners in east Africa and has almost certainly set back operations”. News of Mohammed’s death comes just six weeks after the death of the al-Qaida leader, Osama bin Laden, in a US special forces raid in Pakistan. Last week Ilyas Kashmiri, another senior terrorist with ties to al-Qaida, was also reported to have been killed. Kenyan police, who cited Somali officials, said Mohammed had been shot dead when he and an associate refused to stop at a checkpoint north-west of Mogadishu, the Somali capital, earlier this week. The dead man, thought to be aged 38, had a false passport and $40,000 in cash it was reported. “We have confirmed he was killed by

Continue reading …
Joe Lieberman’s Cruel Plan To Make Medicare Truly Awful

Click here to view this media ( President Lieberman was for the expansion of Medicare just three months ago! ) When you’re rich, cruel, going on seventy, childishly resentful and happen to be a Senator, proposals like this come easily. That’s Joe Lieberman, one of the Village Elders. Paul Krugman: So Joe Lieberman is proposing that we raise the Medicare eligibility age . That’s a truly cruel idea; as it happens, I know several people who are hanging on, postponing needed medical care, hoping that they can make it to 65 before something terrible happens. And if I know such people in my fairly sheltered social circles, just imagine how widespread such stories must be. But beyond that, think about what it means to move people out of Medicare into private insurance, if they can get it. Medicare has its problems — but all the evidence says that it is substantially more cost-effective than private insurance. Partly this is because it has lower administrative costs; partly it’s because Medicare is able to use its market power to negotiate lower prices. And the international evidence is overwhelming: single-payer systems are much cheaper than systems centered on private insurance. So think of this as a national interest thing rather than a budget thing: Lieberman is proposing that we move a substantial number of older Americans into a worse, more expensive health care system. Why would you want to do such a thing, as opposed to raising enough additional revenue to keep them on Medicare? I’ll tell you why. Because he’s an attention junkie who hates the people he used to represent and you can just assume that the Sunday talk shows and FOX News will greet him on with open arms and give him a big wet kiss for his valiant effort of “talking to America like an adult.” There was a time not too long ago when he supported the idea of lowering the age to 55. In the vid, Lieberman appeared to go further than the current Senate deal, which would expand Medicare to those aged 55-64, saying he supported the idea of expanding it to people aged 50 and over. Lieberman referenced his proposal along these lines during the 2006 campaign, and added: “My proposals were to basically expand the existing successful public health insurance programs Medicare and Medicaid… “When it came to Medicare I was very focused on a group — post 50, maybe more like post 55. People who have retired early, or unfortunately have been laid off early, who lose their health insurance and they’re too young to qualify for Medicare. “What I was proposing was that they have an option to buy into Medicare early and again on the premise that that would be less expensive than the enormous cost. If you’re 55 or 60 and you’re without health insurance and you go in to try to buy it, because you’re older … you’re rated as a risk so you pay a lot of money.” With BFF’s like Glenn Beck , it’s not surprising anymore what this gasbag will propose, but there is no excuse to hurt 98% of our population out of some twisted vendetta. How many American seniors would simply die or suffer so much more pain under his plan? Kevin Drum explains, it’s another Paul Ryan Ponzi scheme: Of course, the problem is that controlling spending and revenue levels is a lot easier than controlling cost growth. So, like the proverbial drunk looking under the lamppost for his car keys because the light is better there, that’s where Lieberman is looking. But in the end, it won’t work. It’s true that we’re likely to need ways to cut Medicare’s spending levels and increase its revenue levels, but 80% of our energy should be spent on reining in cost growth. Lieberman’s plan doesn’t. UPDATE: Actually, it’s even worse than this. Raising the Medicare eligibility age would probably be bad for health outcomes and, in the end, might raise Medicare costs, not lower them. Austin Frakt and Aaron Carroll have the data and the charts here .

Continue reading …