O’Reilly thinks it’s ‘insane’ to see the radical right as a serious domestic-terrorism problem
Click here to view this media Bill O’Reilly has been sneering all week at the notion that the threat of terrorism from the American radical right is, in terms of domestic terrorism, of greater significance than that from homegrown Islamic radicals — even after the most recent case of domestic terrorism to hit the news this week involved the arrest of a neo-Nazi for the attempted Martin Luther King Day parade bombing in Spokane. Of course, O’Reilly is in deep denial about this reality, as is Rep. Peter King, whose “Muslim radicalization” hearings have been the talk of Fox all week. Indeed, when Geraldo Rivera pointed it out to O’Reilly on his Fox show Friday, O’Reilly acted as though it was the first he’d heard of the matter. That’s some knowledgeable insight on domestic terrorism, eh? RIVERA: He’s got a point. You know, I understand his point. His larger point, which I totally endorse, is that it is unfair, as you mention in your lead-in, to single out this one group. O’REILLY: OK. Now, I didn’t say it was unfair. I said some people, like you, crazy left wingers, think it is. (CROSSTALK) RIVERA: Can I tell — it’s not 126. That’s Eric Holder’s number of the people prosecuted for terrorism. But your audience has to know that of the 126, we’re talking about 50 American citizens. The vast majority of the 50 American citizens are like the knuckleheads from Newberg, entrapped into doing terror with co-conspirators who are really FBI agents leading them down the primrose path. O’REILLY: If you look — if you look at the totality of the problem, in the world, not the United States, it is Muslim-jihad generated. Congressman Green has the nerve to foist upon the American public that the KKK should be equally looked at when the KKK hasn’t had any — any kind of impact on this country for decades. So you’re saying to yourself… RIVERA: I don’t think so that’s true. I think the KKK — O’REILLY: Do you think the KKK has any influence in this country right now? RIVERA: Let me — let me tell you and your audience that January 17, the last act of attempted terror in the United States, that was a neo-Nazi, that guy in Spokane, Washington, who planted a weapon of mass destruction on the route of the Martin Luther King Day parade march. And that was terrorism. This was a neo-Nazi. And why wouldn’t a hearing on domestic terror include a heinous act like that? O’REILLY: Was he associated with a group? RIVERA: Yes. He was a neo-Nazi, I forget — which — which of the… O’REILLY: According to the Spokane police, he was a lone crazy nut. RIVERA: That’s not true. He is definitely a neo-Nazi. The National Alliance. I have a note. The National Alliance. O’REILLY: The National Alliance. Look, I’m not opposed to having hearings about these people, but to raise… RIVERA: Peter King is a great guy. O’REILLY: … them to the equivalency of the jihad is insane. Wanna know what’s insane? The fact that we have 23 identifiable instances of serious right-wing domestic terrorism of the past two and a half years, and guys like O’Reilly can just whitewash it away: Know what else is insane? That guys like O’Reilly can keep citing utterly discredited misinformation such as Frank Gaffney’s utterly nonsensical claim that “85 percent of mosques” in America are radicalized — and can simply get away with it — because they’re too big to care. Yep, there’s plenty of “insane” to go around on Fox.
View original post here:
O’Reilly thinks it’s ‘insane’ to see the radical right as a serious domestic-terrorism problem
Posted by
on March 12, 2011. Filed under