President Obama can’t run on his abysmal record, writes Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post , so instead he’s found a convenient scapegoat in the rich. His strategy boils down to a simple theme: “Plutocrats are bleeding the country, and I shall rescue you from them.” The left loves it, but…
Continue reading …Fear of detention, families torn apart – Hispanics in Alabama are trapped in a unique half-life under punishing new immigrant laws • Latest: police can detain suspected illegal migrants, court rules • In pictures: life under Alabama’s immigration law Isobel Gomez’s apartment on the outskirts of Birmingham, Alabama, has the hunkered-down quality of a wartime bunker. There are boxes of bottled water, rice, beans and tortillas stacked against the living room wall – sufficient to last her family of five several days. The curtains are drawn and the lights on, even though it is early afternoon. For the past two weeks, this small space has been Gomez’s prison cell. She has been cooped up here, shut off from natural light and almost all contact with the outside world since 28 September, the day a judge upheld the new law that has given Alabama the distinction of having the most draconian immigration powers in America. Gomez (the name is not her real one, at her request) used to be a gregarious person, taking her daughters to school, visiting her mother nearby, shopping every day. Now she leaves the apartment only once a week, to stock up on those boxes of essentials at the local Walmart. The day after the new law was upheld, Gomez saw three police cars driving around her housing complex, which is almost entirely Hispanic in occupancy. Word went around that the police asked men standing on the street to go inside their homes or face arrest. She took the mandate literally, and from that moment has barely set foot outside. She no longer drives, her car sitting unused by the kerbside. Under the new law, police have to check the immigration papers of anyone “suspicious” they stop for a routine traffic violation – a missing brake light, perhaps, or parking on the wrong spot. “If they see me they will think I’m suspicious and then they will detain me indefinitely,” Gomez says. Why would the police think she was suspicious? “They will see the colour of my skin.” Gomez’s is one of thousands of Hispanic families in Alabama trapped in a sort of half-life while they wait to see what will happen in the courts to the new law, HB56. Both the US department of justice and a coalition of local groups are challenging the clampdown at the 11th circuit appeals court in Atlanta, Georgia. The court must decide whether to allow the new law to stand or to block it pending higher judgment by the US supreme court; its ruling is expected by the end of this week. Tough provisions While the judges deliberate, Alabama’s uniquely tough new provisions remain in effect. In addition to the police check of “suspicious” people, anyone failing to carry immigration papers is now deemed to be committing a criminal act. Undocumented immigrants are also forbidden from entering into a transaction with the state, which has already led some town halls to demand residents produce their papers or risk losing water supply . Schools have been instructed to check the immigration status of new pupils as young as four. Even families legally entitled to be in the country are being caught. Cineo Gonzalez was shocked a few weeks ago when his six-year-old daughter came home from school carrying a printout. It gave details of HB56 and its implications, under the heading: “Frequent questions about the immigration law.” Gonzalez is a US permanent resident, having come from Mexico more than 20 years ago. His daughter is an American citizen, having been born in Alabama. Both are entirely legal. Yet she was one of only two children in her class – both Hispanic in appearance – who were given the printout. Why was she singled out, Gonzalez asked the deputy head teacher. “Because we gave the printout to children we thought were not from here,” came the reply. Gonzalez is a taxi driver. Soon after the law came into effect, he began getting calls from Hispanic families. “People started asking me for prices. How much would it cost to go to Indiana? How much to New York? Or Atlanta, or Texas, or Ohio, or North Carolina?” At about 2am one night, he was woken up by a woman who asked him to come and pick her and her family up immediately and drive them to North Carolina. He went drove to their apartment where he found the two parents, three children and a small number of bags waiting for him. “Can you hurry up, we’re very scared,” the woman said. “The police followed my husband on his way back from work and that’s why we’re leaving.” It took eight hours to get to North Carolina. The children slept the whole journey; the father sat in silence; the mother cried all the way. “That was devastating,” Gonzalez says. “I knew things were bad, but this really showed me something was happening. Families are being destroyed.” ‘They see us as servants’ Outside the offices of the Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama, HICA, about 30 people – including several small children – are sitting waiting for legal advice. An overflow room has been set up at the back of the building to accommodate families who arrive throughout the day. In a consulting room, a case manager is drawing up a power of attorney letter for a couple who fear they could be rounded up and deported at any time. The legal document – one of hundreds taken out by parents in the state – sets out what should happen to their eight-year-old daughter should they both suddenly disappear. In this case, it gives one of the couple’s friends, a US citizen, the power to make decisions for the girl on anything from medical procedures to schooling. “This is very cruel, very extreme,” the mother says, asking to remain anonymous. “We have never done harm to anyone. We’ve only worked hard. Now they’re trying to split us from our child.” Why does she think they – the Alabama authorities – are doing this? “We ask ourselves that too. Why are they doing this? They say it’s because we are taking jobs from local people, but I don’t think it can be about that. It’s about racism.” Her husband chimes in: “They see us as servants. As people they can keep at the bottom. Not as people who want a better future for ourselves and for our children.” Most of the 100 or so families who are now coming to HICA for help every day are doing so to have powers of attorney drawn up for their kids. Others want advice about what to do when teachers enquire about their children’s status. Increasingly, people are coming in having been fired by their employers for lack of immigration papers. ‘We do the jobs nobody wants to do’ Efren Cruz has lived in Alabama for 23 years having come here when he was 14 from Mexico. He speaks fluent English with a rich southern drawl. Since HB56 came into effect he has been sacked by four different steel and paper mills where he has worked on and off for years. Now he’s jobless. But he’s not taking it supinely. He laughs at the suggestion that the new law is designed to stop illegal Mexicans taking jobs away from worthy and needy local Alabamans. “We aren’t taking anybody’s jobs because, let’s face it, they don’t want to work. We do the jobs that nobody else wants to do.” Despite the fact that he is undocumented, and thus liable to be detained under the new law, he is among a small group of protesters outside the federal court in Birmingham. His fellow demonstrators include a seven-year-old boy carrying a placard that says: “I just look illegal”, and Cruz’s niece Angela, a US citizen aged two, whose sign says: “They can’t deport us ALL”. Cruz had hoped that many more people would have joined the protest. Over the past week they have been petitioning members of their local church to attend, and about 400 promised to come along. Only about 25 turned up. “That’s how scared people are,” Cruz says. Other sporadic and tentative protests are cropping up across the state. A nearby Mexican restaurant, Gordos Market (which translates as “Fat people’s market”), is closed for three days. A sign on the front door explains that it is shuttered out of “Apoya por una buena causa” – support for a good cause. Across the state this week, poultry and meat processing plants, including the giant Tyson, have been closed or put on limited production schedules because of an unofficial walkout by Hispanic workers. In the north of the state, the pungent smell of rotting tomatoes hangs in the air across huge tranches of land that has been virtually abandoned by workers who, through fear or anger, are no longer turning up to gather the harvest. Just how long this standoff will continue, and what happens to the thousands of families caught in limbo, will depend largely on what the 11th circuit appeals court rules, and ultimately on the final say of the US supreme court. In the meantime, though, Isobel Gomez remains trapped inside her prison cell apartment. The only thing keeping her here, she says, is her daughters, who want to stay and make a life for themselves in America as countless millions of immigrant Americans have done before them. “Every day I ask myself the question: how much longer can I survive this? How much longer can I bear sitting at home, unable to leave the house? How much longer can I stand the humiliation of knowing that I’m seen by others as a bad person, as a criminal? If it were down to me, I’d have had enough already.” Alabama US immigration United States US constitution and civil liberties US domestic policy Ed Pilkington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The new iPhones are out today, and one tester has already explored the blog-worthy bizarreness of its question-and-answer function . Ask Siri a question and it’ll tell you the answer, whether you want to know the location of the nearest Starbucks or the meaning of life, This is my next finds….
Continue reading …Stephen Twigg’s statement in favour of test-based support to government’s schools policy contradicts Ed Miliband’s criticism Labour’s new education spokesman has said he backs the setting up of “free schools”, signalling a significant shift in policy from his predecessor. In an interview with the Liverpool Daily Post , Stephen Twigg said Labour will embrace the government’s “schools revolution” providing certain tests are met. The first 24 free schools opened last month. They are intended to tackle divides in England’s education system, including a concentration of the weakest schools in the poorest areas. But analysis commissioned by the Guardian has found that the first 24 are tilted towards areas dominated by middle-class households. Labour leader Ed Miliband told the BBC’s Andrew Marr programme three weeks ago that he was opposed to free schools. Twigg’s predecessor, Andy Burnham, had described free schools as a “reckless gamble”. Then Burnham said free schools were a “free-for-all, where good schools can be destabilised and where teachers can be employed without teaching qualifications”. But in his first interview, Twigg, the Liverpool West Derby MP, said he would back the setting-up of “free schools” by parents, teachers or non-profit groups if they helped poorer children and the wider community. Twigg said: “On free schools, I am saying that we need to apply a set of tests, that we are not going to take an absolute policy of opposing them. “The tests should be: will the school raise standards for pupils and parents, will it contribute to a narrowing of the achievement gap between rich and poor, and what is the wider impact of that school?” He insisted he was not dramatically shifting the party’s position, adding: “Andy never said he had an absolute policy of opposing free schools either.” The Tories are privately pleased at this shift, believing greater cross-party consensus can only serve to shore up the project that has had a faltering take up. While Burnham was in position, Twigg was disciplined in what he said about education, but during a parliamentary debate in May, he admitted to being “hugely impressed” by free school equivalents in the US – the knowledge is power programme that he described as “a great example of how some of these new, more autonomous schools in the US are delivering”. Labour Free schools Schools Education policy Michael Gove Ed Miliband Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo points out what he sees a change in the “national conversation” about the economy: It’s all about jobs now instead of the debt and deficit. Witness the Republican senators who unveiled a jobs plan of their own , along with John Boehner giving an “earful”…
Continue reading …Teenage boys are learning the value of wearing a rubber. According to a new CDC study, 80% of boys aged 15-19 say they used a condom the first time they had sex, a nine-point jump from 2002, the LA Times reports. Even better, 16% said that in addition to using…
Continue reading …The remake of Footloose , starring Kenny Wormald as a young man who shakes up a dance-free town, isn’t much different from the original. But that’s not necessarily bad: “This incarnation of Footloose may not make as great a dent in the current generation as the original film had,” writes William…
Continue reading …Sure, Hillary Clinton has made it sound like there’s no way she’ll be President Obama’s running mate in 2012. But no doesn’t mean no “when politicians say it,” writes Jonathan Alter at Bloomberg . Bob Woodward said last year that a Clinton-Biden job trade was “on the table”; now, an Obama…
Continue reading …Don’t do drugs, stop hating your thighs, buy shares in Google: 10 celebrities write letters to their 16-year-old selves with some choice words of advice Chris Fenn
Continue reading …Assuming no last-minute hiccups, Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit will be back home on Tuesday after five years in Hamas captivity, reports AFP . On that day, Israel will release 450 Palestinian prisoners—another 550 will be released later—in exchange for Shalit’s freedom. An additional 27 female prisoners will also be…
Continue reading …