Rights groups say decision to flog Shaimaa Justaneyah for driving her car is payback for allowing women to vote in elections Saudi rights groups claimed on Wednesday that a decision to sentence a woman to 10 lashes for driving her car was payback by the ruling class for this week’s landmark speech by King Abdullah, which cleared the way for women to participate in elections. The sentence is believed to be the first of its kind in Saudi Arabia that has not involved a violation of Islamic law. It was handed down in the wake of around 20 women being arrested over the past few months for taking to the wheel as part of a campaign to showcase their lack of rights in the rigidly conservative society. Last night it was reported that King Abdullah had intervened to revoke the sentence. The news came in a tweet from Princess Ameerah, wife of billionaire investor Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. Earlier the convicted woman, Shaimaa Justaneyah, was reportedly in shock at the sentence. “I cannot think straight because of what I have had to go through,” Justaneyah told the website Arab News. Another female driver, Najla Hariri, is due to stand trial in front of the same prosecutor early next month. Justaneyah’s friend Samar Bedawi, who also drives her car around the Red Sea city of Jeddah, said the sentence undermined the king’s speech, which had won plaudits from the international community. “She is depressed and doesn’t want to talk about it, mainly because of the tribal rules which forbid using our names like this in the media,” said Bedawi. “She is very scared. The king’s speech was intended to quieten the religious current in Saudi Arabia. Both the judges reacted to this and want to show that they clearly hold the reins. “It was a big breakthrough when the king announced that women could vote … There was joy felt all around the country. But then reality sunk in and it was clear that he was just postponing what should be a basic right by another four years.” Earlier this week the 87-year-old king decreed that women could take part in the next council elections in 2015. However, women will not be able to cast votes in the 2011 ballot which will be held across Saudi Arabia today. Another Jeddah-based woman, Sulafa Kurdi, said the Saudi establishment was fighting back. “They are trying to say that they don’t want to give us rights even though the king gave women the right to vote and to join the congress of Saudi Arabia.” The king’s announcements had been many years in the making and were expected to meet resistance from a ruling class that is underpinned by a conservative clerical base which staunchly opposes a broader role for women. The sentence, handed down by a court in Jeddah on Tuesday, was a sharp escalation from earlier punishments handed down to female drivers over the past month. “All of them had to sign statements that they wouldn’t do it again,” said rights campaigner Waleed Abdul al-Kheir. “This sentence is the first time anything like this has happened.” Justaneyah was arrested around the same time as several other female drivers took to the streets during the summer in a show of defiance that was broadcast around the world and on social media sites. The mini rebellion soon took on the feel of a campaign and tapped into the current of self determination which is sweeping the Middle East as part of the Arab spring. The themes of the regional revolt, such as popular participation, have resonated with some in Saudi Arabia, where the Muslim holy book, the Qur’an, acts as the constitution, but few had dared to take to the streets to push for change. “The world is mistaken, however, if it thinks the right to drive is our most important demand,” said Saudi journalist Rima al-Mukhtar, who has covered the plight of female drivers. “There are many others that need to be addressed even before that. It’s the time for Saudi women to shine, time to start investing in themselves, time to prove that they are up to taking responsibility. It can be done within the parameters of our religion and culture. We must not give ground to those who claim that women’s rights are a western intrusion into our way of life.” Several women interviewed on Wednesday said they did not believe the sentence of 10 lashes would be carried out. They said the threat of flogging women for driving was likely to deter many from continuing the campaign to drive. “I would love to continue driving,” said Kurdi. “But I don’t want to rush back. I have my mother’s state of mind to consider.” After handing out plaudits earlier in the week for Saudi Arabia’s apparent readiness to allow women a greater role in civic life, international groups have renewed their strident criticism in the wake of the court decision. “Belatedly allowing women to vote in council elections is all well and good,” said Amnesty International’s Middle East and north Africa deputy director, Philip Luther. “But if they are still going to face being flogged for trying to exercise their right to freedom of movement then the king’s much-trumpeted ‘reforms’ actually amount to very little.” Saudi Arabia Human rights Women Middle East Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Amazon is introducing its new Kindle Fire tablet in New York, but Bloomberg got some details—and Mashable got a picture—early. For one thing, the $199 price tag is lower than rumored. It will feature a 7-inch display and WiFi capability, but no 3G, camera, or microphone. A free…
Continue reading …Southwest Airlines originally stated that L Word actress Leisha Hailey was booted from her flight Sunday due to an excessive PDA with her girlfriend, but now the airline says it was actually profanity that got the couple removed from the plane. In a statement released yesterday, SWA says that additional…
Continue reading …France’s most self-critical film star, Charlotte Gainsbourg has grown up surrounded by controversy. As she collaborates with Lars von Trier once again, in Melancholia, she talks here about motherhood, movies and preserving her father’s memory A pregnant Charlotte Gainsbourg runs her fingers across her bump, which is encased in cashmere and discreetly wedged behind the table of a Paris hotel bar. She is trying to work out what her children might hate her for. Because to her, France’s most self-critical film star, it is obvious that they will hate her for something. “You always have so much to reproach your parents for,” she muses. “It’s normal. I
Continue reading …France’s most self-critical film star, Charlotte Gainsbourg has grown up surrounded by controversy. As she collaborates with Lars von Trier once again, in Melancholia, she talks here about motherhood, movies and preserving her father’s memory A pregnant Charlotte Gainsbourg runs her fingers across her bump, which is encased in cashmere and discreetly wedged behind the table of a Paris hotel bar. She is trying to work out what her children might hate her for. Because to her, France’s most self-critical film star, it is obvious that they will hate her for something. “You always have so much to reproach your parents for,” she muses. “It’s normal. I
Continue reading …Shadow health secretary warns moves to privatise hospitals will ‘drive a wedge’ – but still place for private sector in other areas John Healey, the shadow health secretary, has pledged that a Labour government would ensure NHS hospitals remain in public sector hands as he rounded on government plans to open up all parts of the NHS to private companies. Healey also seized on the crisis witnessed at Southern Cross care homes earlier this year to admit that Labour “did not act before” against predatory fund managers who saw “elderly people as commodities”. But he promised that a future Labour government would do so by regulating the care home sector not just on the basis of best care standards but also on “best business practices”. Healey delivered a combative speech to the Labour party conference in Liverpool after delegates debated a motion condemning the government’s controversial health and social care bill as unnecessary and representing “the biggest top-down reorganisation in the history of the NHS at a time when finances are squeezed”. Despite changes to the bill, the motion stated that health professionals are still opposed to it “because the essential elements … remain in place, which will fragment the NHS through exposing the NHS to the full force of EU and UK competition law with a commercial regulated market designed to give the impression of patent choice”. The new NHS commissioning board will be “the largest quango the world has ever seen”, it said. Healey warned that the battle was “not over” against the legislative plans in the health and social care bill, which would break up the national service and set it up as a “full scale market, ruled for the first time by the full of competition law”. Accusing David Cameron of betrayal, he said. “No one wants this. No one voted for this.” He said the proposals threatened to destroy Labour’s “golden legacy” to NHS patients, as he hailed the founding of the NHS under a post-war Labour government, and the great improvements he said patients saw under the party’s 13 years in power through investment and reform. Referring to reports that ministers were privately eyeing up the “huge opportunities for the private sector”, Healey said any move to privatise NHS hospitals would drive a wedge between hospitals and the wider health service as private companies driven by the bottom line to make profits would refuse to collaborate with others. But he ruled out barring private sector involvement in any shape in the NHS. Healey, whose predecessors introduced independent treatment centres, said Labour believed there would always be an important contribution for non-NHS providers, “including private providers” in the NHS, but as supplements to, not substitutes for, the NHS. But loud applause followed when he drew a line on private companies moving in to run NHS hospitals. “Hospitals are at the heart of our NHS. They should be in public not private hands, dedicated totally to patients, not profits. So we will oppose any move to privatise NHS hospitals. We will guarantee under Labour that the NHS hospitals remain in the NHS.” Signalling that further reforms would be implemented by a future Labour party in office, he unveiled plans for developing integrated care organisations to allow primary secondary and social care to work together. But he ruled out a role for the private sector on this front too. “Because our values demand we’re not neutral on who provides care, we will look to promote those that share a true social ethos over those driven by narrow commercial interests.” “We make this pledge not because we want no change in the NHS but because we need greater change. Because our health and care system must reform, and must retain the faith of all who need and use it.” However the prospect of further reforms under Labour is unlikely to be well received by health care unions, who complained about the constant changes introduced by Labour during its 13 years in power. Healey rehearsed ground trodden by Labour leader Ed Miliband in his keynote speech on Tuesday , by accusing Cameron of a litany of “broken promises” on the NHS. “He’s breaking each and every one of his personal NHS promises,” said Healey. “Protect the NHS – broken. Give the NHS a real rise in funding – broken. Stop top-down reorganisations – broken. Big time.” Healey went on: “That’s why people are starting to see the NHS go backwards again with the Tories. Services cut; treatments denied; long waiting times up. We’ve seen over a million patients suffer long waits for treatment under David Cameron, breaking Labour’s guarantees to patients.” “The NHS was built by the people. It is cherished by the people. It belongs to the people. Let us tell David Cameron today. We will give voice to the dissent of people who heard your promises, saw your posters; people who wanted to believe you before the election but are now seeing the truth. You can’t trust the Tories with our NHS. Bevan said ‘the NHS will last as long as there are folk with the faith to fight for it’. Conference, this is our faith. Our fight.” The Conservatives dismissed the speech as vacuous. Andrew Lansley, the health secretary, said: “With no announcements, and no vision for the NHS, Labour resorted today to nothing more than ludicrous scare-mongering. The simple truth is that waiting times have come down since the general election and we are committed to making sure they remain stable. “Labour failed to answer any of the questions they needed to today – and John Healey refused to condemn his Welsh Labour colleagues who are slashing the NHS budget by 8.3%. “Labour spent the last decade loading the NHS with debt, and would now be cutting it by £30bn. If Labour were ever allowed to run the NHS again, they would run it into the ground.” A panel debate staged at the party conference before Healey’s speech heard from Roger Boyle, former national clinical director at the Department of Health, who resigned in July, raised his concerns about the plans outlined in the health legislative plans. He told the party conference he had worked for a long list of health secretaries under Labour – Alan Milburn, John Reid, Patricia Hewitt, Alan Johnson and Andy Burnham, but referring to Andrew Lansley, he said: “I find the current incumbent rather more difficult. I resigned in July. I did not think there was a democratic mandate to do this, to do the things they are proposing to do.” Delegates spoke passionately in the afternoon debate on the NHS motion, which calls on Labour to “step up local and national campaigning activity” against the health bill and to continue to oppose it in the Lords. Martin Rathfelder of Labour’s National Policy Forum said: “There is never enough money to pay for everything we do in health. All health services are rationed. The beauty of the British health service is that money is not an advantage and poverty is not a disadvantage.” But under the coalition’s plans “we will see more rationing, we will see more queues, but not for the rich. If you need IVF it might not be available on the NHS but it’s available if you go private, and we will see more of that.” The motion also deplores the collapse of the care home company Southern Cross and the abuse at the Winterbourne View care home, saying the government has “failed to regulate the social care sector in a way which protected residents, gave support to their relatives and ensured taxpayers’ money was accountable”. It calls for the government to publish a full list of all operators and landlords receiving “any part of the billions of taxpayers’ funding provided for residential care which is finding its way into private sector companies”. Sharon Holder of the GMB union, a former home help for elderly, sick and dying people, told the conference: “The scandal of Southern Cross is a mere taster for the future of social care … the textbook of how unscrupulous profiteers can make riches from vulnerable people.” Healey told delegates that people’s confidence had been shaken by the crisis at Southern Cross for some of the most vulnerable in society. “We did not act before, but we will in the future,” he said. “So we will regulate for the best business practices as well as the best care standards.” NHS Labour conference Healthcare industry Labour Ed Miliband Andrew Lansley David Cameron Southern Cross Healthcare Health Trade unions Paul Owen Hélène Mulholland Randeep Ramesh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Shadow health secretary warns moves to privatise hospitals will ‘drive a wedge’ – but still place for private sector in other areas John Healey, the shadow health secretary, has pledged that a Labour government would ensure NHS hospitals remain in public sector hands as he rounded on government plans to open up all parts of the NHS to private companies. Healey also seized on the crisis witnessed at Southern Cross care homes earlier this year to admit that Labour “did not act before” against predatory fund managers who saw “elderly people as commodities”. But he promised that a future Labour government would do so by regulating the care home sector not just on the basis of best care standards but also on “best business practices”. Healey delivered a combative speech to the Labour party conference in Liverpool after delegates debated a motion condemning the government’s controversial health and social care bill as unnecessary and representing “the biggest top-down reorganisation in the history of the NHS at a time when finances are squeezed”. Despite changes to the bill, the motion stated that health professionals are still opposed to it “because the essential elements … remain in place, which will fragment the NHS through exposing the NHS to the full force of EU and UK competition law with a commercial regulated market designed to give the impression of patent choice”. The new NHS commissioning board will be “the largest quango the world has ever seen”, it said. Healey warned that the battle was “not over” against the legislative plans in the health and social care bill, which would break up the national service and set it up as a “full scale market, ruled for the first time by the full of competition law”. Accusing David Cameron of betrayal, he said. “No one wants this. No one voted for this.” He said the proposals threatened to destroy Labour’s “golden legacy” to NHS patients, as he hailed the founding of the NHS under a post-war Labour government, and the great improvements he said patients saw under the party’s 13 years in power through investment and reform. Referring to reports that ministers were privately eyeing up the “huge opportunities for the private sector”, Healey said any move to privatise NHS hospitals would drive a wedge between hospitals and the wider health service as private companies driven by the bottom line to make profits would refuse to collaborate with others. But he ruled out barring private sector involvement in any shape in the NHS. Healey, whose predecessors introduced independent treatment centres, said Labour believed there would always be an important contribution for non-NHS providers, “including private providers” in the NHS, but as supplements to, not substitutes for, the NHS. But loud applause followed when he drew a line on private companies moving in to run NHS hospitals. “Hospitals are at the heart of our NHS. They should be in public not private hands, dedicated totally to patients, not profits. So we will oppose any move to privatise NHS hospitals. We will guarantee under Labour that the NHS hospitals remain in the NHS.” Signalling that further reforms would be implemented by a future Labour party in office, he unveiled plans for developing integrated care organisations to allow primary secondary and social care to work together. But he ruled out a role for the private sector on this front too. “Because our values demand we’re not neutral on who provides care, we will look to promote those that share a true social ethos over those driven by narrow commercial interests.” “We make this pledge not because we want no change in the NHS but because we need greater change. Because our health and care system must reform, and must retain the faith of all who need and use it.” However the prospect of further reforms under Labour is unlikely to be well received by health care unions, who complained about the constant changes introduced by Labour during its 13 years in power. Healey rehearsed ground trodden by Labour leader Ed Miliband in his keynote speech on Tuesday , by accusing Cameron of a litany of “broken promises” on the NHS. “He’s breaking each and every one of his personal NHS promises,” said Healey. “Protect the NHS – broken. Give the NHS a real rise in funding – broken. Stop top-down reorganisations – broken. Big time.” Healey went on: “That’s why people are starting to see the NHS go backwards again with the Tories. Services cut; treatments denied; long waiting times up. We’ve seen over a million patients suffer long waits for treatment under David Cameron, breaking Labour’s guarantees to patients.” “The NHS was built by the people. It is cherished by the people. It belongs to the people. Let us tell David Cameron today. We will give voice to the dissent of people who heard your promises, saw your posters; people who wanted to believe you before the election but are now seeing the truth. You can’t trust the Tories with our NHS. Bevan said ‘the NHS will last as long as there are folk with the faith to fight for it’. Conference, this is our faith. Our fight.” The Conservatives dismissed the speech as vacuous. Andrew Lansley, the health secretary, said: “With no announcements, and no vision for the NHS, Labour resorted today to nothing more than ludicrous scare-mongering. The simple truth is that waiting times have come down since the general election and we are committed to making sure they remain stable. “Labour failed to answer any of the questions they needed to today – and John Healey refused to condemn his Welsh Labour colleagues who are slashing the NHS budget by 8.3%. “Labour spent the last decade loading the NHS with debt, and would now be cutting it by £30bn. If Labour were ever allowed to run the NHS again, they would run it into the ground.” A panel debate staged at the party conference before Healey’s speech heard from Roger Boyle, former national clinical director at the Department of Health, who resigned in July, raised his concerns about the plans outlined in the health legislative plans. He told the party conference he had worked for a long list of health secretaries under Labour – Alan Milburn, John Reid, Patricia Hewitt, Alan Johnson and Andy Burnham, but referring to Andrew Lansley, he said: “I find the current incumbent rather more difficult. I resigned in July. I did not think there was a democratic mandate to do this, to do the things they are proposing to do.” Delegates spoke passionately in the afternoon debate on the NHS motion, which calls on Labour to “step up local and national campaigning activity” against the health bill and to continue to oppose it in the Lords. Martin Rathfelder of Labour’s National Policy Forum said: “There is never enough money to pay for everything we do in health. All health services are rationed. The beauty of the British health service is that money is not an advantage and poverty is not a disadvantage.” But under the coalition’s plans “we will see more rationing, we will see more queues, but not for the rich. If you need IVF it might not be available on the NHS but it’s available if you go private, and we will see more of that.” The motion also deplores the collapse of the care home company Southern Cross and the abuse at the Winterbourne View care home, saying the government has “failed to regulate the social care sector in a way which protected residents, gave support to their relatives and ensured taxpayers’ money was accountable”. It calls for the government to publish a full list of all operators and landlords receiving “any part of the billions of taxpayers’ funding provided for residential care which is finding its way into private sector companies”. Sharon Holder of the GMB union, a former home help for elderly, sick and dying people, told the conference: “The scandal of Southern Cross is a mere taster for the future of social care … the textbook of how unscrupulous profiteers can make riches from vulnerable people.” Healey told delegates that people’s confidence had been shaken by the crisis at Southern Cross for some of the most vulnerable in society. “We did not act before, but we will in the future,” he said. “So we will regulate for the best business practices as well as the best care standards.” NHS Labour conference Healthcare industry Labour Ed Miliband Andrew Lansley David Cameron Southern Cross Healthcare Health Trade unions Paul Owen Hélène Mulholland Randeep Ramesh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A lawsuit filed by a civil liberties group details dozens of instances of alleged physical abuse in the Los Angeles County jail system. One former inmate says that after he protested that guards were harassing a mentally ill prisoner, those same guards took him into another room, slammed his head into a wall and punched
Continue reading …A lawsuit filed by a civil liberties group details dozens of instances of alleged physical abuse in the Los Angeles County jail system. One former inmate says that after he protested that guards were harassing a mentally ill prisoner, those same guards took him into another room, slammed his head into a wall and punched
Continue reading …The New York Mets’ owners may have to return some of $300 million in profits they made dealing with Bernie Madoff, but their $700 million principal is probably safe. A judge has decided that for trustee Irving Picard to pursue the Mets owners’ principal investment, he must prove that they…
Continue reading …