Florida officials have all but decided to hold their presidential primary at the end of January, essentially shredding the carefully orchestrated Republican nominating calendar, Florida House Speaker Dean Cannon tells CNN . “We are expecting to meet on Friday, and I expect that they will pick January 31 as Florida’s primary…
Continue reading …International law failed miserably at keeping the abuses of dictators in check in the 20th century, and two op-ed writers in the Washington Post propose a novel solution for the 21st: Make dictatorships themselves illegal. The Arab Spring makes clear that democracy is the way forward all over the world,…
Continue reading …Newer sport utility vehicles are significantly less deadly than those of decades past, according to a new analysis of federal data. From 2008 to 2009, the fatality rate for passengers in 3,000- to 3,499-pound cars or minivans hit by similarly-sized SUVs was 16 per million registered vehicles. That’s…
Continue reading …Progress in reducing logging marred by brutal killings of environmental campaigners Even here, Tuesday is an unusual day to die. At the weekend there is no shortage of bloodletting in this corner of the Amazon. Bar brawls, knife fights, lovers’ tiffs, alcohol-soaked arguments, all with the same predictable coda: a slit throat, a shot to the head, a visit from Maraba’s over-worked head of forensic science, José Augusto Andrade, and a gory crime-scene photograph splashed across the pages of a tabloid. Tuesdays, though, are normally quiet. But 24 May this year was an
Continue reading …It’s getting tough to “separate fact from farce” in the GOP presidential debate, writes Dana Milbank of the Washington Post . Former Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain, for instance, recently said he might actually use the goofy “I will deliver” motto SNL made up for him. So the question is, was…
Continue reading …Move comes as efforts to launch fresh peace talks are threatened by row over new Jewish settlement The UN security council has moved the issue of recognising a Palestinian state to a committee which could take weeks to reach a decision. The move came as US and European efforts to launch fresh peace talks – and avoid a diplomatic confrontation after Washington said it will veto the statehood bid – were undermined by Israel’s “provocative” announcement that it will build more than 1,000 more homes in a major Jewish settlement. The Palestinian ambassador to the UN, Riyad Mansour, said the security council should approve the statehood request because much of the world already recognises Palestine as a country. “We hope that the security council will shoulder its responsibility and address this application with a positive attitude, especially since we have 139 countries that have recognised the state of Palestine so far, meaning more than two-thirds majority,” Mansour said. “We are ready to govern ourselves.” But the Israeli ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, said that recognition of statehood is meaningless without a peace agreement. “A real Palestinian state, a viable Palestinian state, will not be achieved in composing things from the outside but only in direct negotiations,” he said. “We had peace with Egypt. It wasn’t imposed; we negotiated. With Jordan, the same thing.” The UN committee on new admissions, which is made up of the 15 members of the security council, will meet on Friday morning. It could vote immediately on the Palestinian request or agree to study the matter further. Last week, the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, resisted US pressure to abandon the request for statehood. But at the urging of Washington, London and Paris — which were keen to avoid voting on the issue because of the impact on opinion in the Middle East of failing to support the Palestinian bid — he privately agreed to the slow tracking of the issue while fresh attempts are made to restart negotiations. Those efforts were immediately compromised when the US ensured that a statement by the quartet of the US, UN, EU and Russia proposing a framework timetable for talks, and the immediate addressing of the contentious issues of borders and security, did not call for a halt to construction of Jewish settlements in the occupied territories. But the statement did ask both sides to refrain from provocative actions. This week, Israel announced that it will build 1,100 new houses as well as public buildings and an industrial zone in Gilo settlement. Mansour said the move was a deliberate snub by Israel to peace efforts, because the Palestinians have said that continued construction of housing for Jewish settlers on occupied land is a barrier to talks. “They gave 1,100 answers of saying no to the effort of the international community to open doors to negotiation, and I think speaks clearly that Israel is not interested in negotiating with us – in spite of the fact they say they would like to do so,” he said. Prosor said the settlement expansion is inside Jerusalem and therefore distinct from other parts of the occupied territories. “Jerusalem is the capital of the Jewish people. This is our heart. Jerusalem, if I may say so, was the capital of the Jewish people when London was still a swamp,” he said. However, the area that Gilo is built on was not within the municipal boundaries at the time Israel captured the east of the city in the 1967 war. The city limits have since been greatly expanded to annex Gilo and other settlements to the city. Prosor said Palestinian objections are an excuse for not negotiating. “Everything is negotiable, but I hear the Palestinian using every pretext in order to find a reason why not to go in to negotiations,” he said. The US has called the new settlement construction “counter-productive” and “distressing”. But the Palestinians have little confidence that Washington will do anything about it after Barack Obama made what was widely seen as a strongly pro-Israel speech to the UN. Palestinian territories Israel United Nations Middle East Middle East peace talks Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Move comes as efforts to launch fresh peace talks are threatened by row over new Jewish settlement The UN security council has moved the issue of recognising a Palestinian state to a committee which could take weeks to reach a decision. The move came as US and European efforts to launch fresh peace talks – and avoid a diplomatic confrontation after Washington said it will veto the statehood bid – were undermined by Israel’s “provocative” announcement that it will build more than 1,000 more homes in a major Jewish settlement. The Palestinian ambassador to the UN, Riyad Mansour, said the security council should approve the statehood request because much of the world already recognises Palestine as a country. “We hope that the security council will shoulder its responsibility and address this application with a positive attitude, especially since we have 139 countries that have recognised the state of Palestine so far, meaning more than two-thirds majority,” Mansour said. “We are ready to govern ourselves.” But the Israeli ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, said that recognition of statehood is meaningless without a peace agreement. “A real Palestinian state, a viable Palestinian state, will not be achieved in composing things from the outside but only in direct negotiations,” he said. “We had peace with Egypt. It wasn’t imposed; we negotiated. With Jordan, the same thing.” The UN committee on new admissions, which is made up of the 15 members of the security council, will meet on Friday morning. It could vote immediately on the Palestinian request or agree to study the matter further. Last week, the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, resisted US pressure to abandon the request for statehood. But at the urging of Washington, London and Paris — which were keen to avoid voting on the issue because of the impact on opinion in the Middle East of failing to support the Palestinian bid — he privately agreed to the slow tracking of the issue while fresh attempts are made to restart negotiations. Those efforts were immediately compromised when the US ensured that a statement by the quartet of the US, UN, EU and Russia proposing a framework timetable for talks, and the immediate addressing of the contentious issues of borders and security, did not call for a halt to construction of Jewish settlements in the occupied territories. But the statement did ask both sides to refrain from provocative actions. This week, Israel announced that it will build 1,100 new houses as well as public buildings and an industrial zone in Gilo settlement. Mansour said the move was a deliberate snub by Israel to peace efforts, because the Palestinians have said that continued construction of housing for Jewish settlers on occupied land is a barrier to talks. “They gave 1,100 answers of saying no to the effort of the international community to open doors to negotiation, and I think speaks clearly that Israel is not interested in negotiating with us – in spite of the fact they say they would like to do so,” he said. Prosor said the settlement expansion is inside Jerusalem and therefore distinct from other parts of the occupied territories. “Jerusalem is the capital of the Jewish people. This is our heart. Jerusalem, if I may say so, was the capital of the Jewish people when London was still a swamp,” he said. However, the area that Gilo is built on was not within the municipal boundaries at the time Israel captured the east of the city in the 1967 war. The city limits have since been greatly expanded to annex Gilo and other settlements to the city. Prosor said Palestinian objections are an excuse for not negotiating. “Everything is negotiable, but I hear the Palestinian using every pretext in order to find a reason why not to go in to negotiations,” he said. The US has called the new settlement construction “counter-productive” and “distressing”. But the Palestinians have little confidence that Washington will do anything about it after Barack Obama made what was widely seen as a strongly pro-Israel speech to the UN. Palestinian territories Israel United Nations Middle East Middle East peace talks Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Associated Newspapers voices concern that the prime minister’s appointees lack tabloid or regional newspaper experience The publisher of the Daily Mail has challenged Lord Justice Leveson over the six advisers to the phone-hacking inquiry amid concerns that the prime minister’s appointees lack tabloid or regional newspaper experience. Jonathan Caplan QC, representing Associated Newspapers, told a preliminary hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice that the inquiry would “benefit greatly” if the judge appointed additional advisers “to fill the gap” in expertise. The application by Associated Newspapers was supported by Trinity Mirror, the Newspaper Publishers’ Association and Guardian News and Media. Caplan said Associated did not wish to be confrontational, but the inquiry would “raise very important issues for the future conduct, regulation and ownership of the newspaper industry”. Leveson’s advisory panel includes two prominent journalists – a former political editor of Channel 4 News, Elinor Goodman, and a former political editor of the Daily Telegraph, George Jones. The former chairman of the Financial Times, Sir David Bell, is also one of the appointees. Leveson said he took on board Associated’s concerns and would reserve judgment until he had considered the matter fully. Earlier he told the hearing he was eager to engage with the Daily Mail and had invited the paper’s editor in chief to attend a pre-inquiry seminar next month. Gillian Phillips, director of editorial legal services for the Guardian, said: “Our view is that tabloid and mid-market papers, as well as regional papers, will play a vital part in the story and we believe it is important that those assisting the inquiry reflect the plurality and divergence of the wider UK media.” Leveson said that the role of assessors was limited to assisting from within their area of expertise with the conclusion being “mine and mine alone”. He added: “It is of critical importance throughout this inquiry that I have the help of everybody. I have a vast and difficult task to address within a comparatively short period of time. I accept the importance that it holds for your clients and for the industry, the profession. “I will only start to be able to achieve a sensible resolution of these issues if everybody is pulling in the same direction, albeit from their different standpoints. “I am conscious that I am stepping into a profession that is not the one that I spent 40 years of life in. It is critical that I obtain advice from those who have made their life in this area, not least because I would be keen to understand any flaws that I might have because of lack of experience.” Phone hacking Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Associated Newspapers Daily Mail & General Trust The Guardian Lisa O’Carroll guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Problem? What problem? Rick Perry’s campaign doesn’t see one, despite the drubbing he’s been taking for his lackluster debate and his grisly Florida straw poll defeat . “We’re not going to change what we’re doing,” a Perry spokesman tells Politico , dismissing judgments from “a pundit in a swivel chair in a…
Continue reading …The Labour leader targets centre ground in a public Q&A and insists his plans for Britain are not anti-business Ed Miliband devoted the day after his setpiece speech to the Labour party conference to persuading business leaders that his new vision for the country was not anti-business. The Labour leader appeared upbeat, brushing off suggestions that he was “Red Ed”, and insisting that his was a pro-business agenda that placed him in the middle ground of British politics. Speaking at the end of a Q&A with members of the public – thought to be the first time a political party has opened its doors at an annual conference – he put in a far more assured performance than in his speech the day before. Miliband said the innovation was reinventing politics, and twice overruled the attempts of his compere, the comedian Eddie Izzard, to end the event. His message was consistent – as was the BBC, whose parliament feed failed during the event, after cutting out during Miliband’s speech on Tuesday. He was asked why he wasn’t taking the party to the left. Some in the party are concerned that his theme of “something for something” meant benefits such as housing should be withheld from those who cannot prove the contribution they make to society. He said: “Elections are won from the centre ground. And I think that’s a good thing. I want Conservatives voting for us – that’s how we win elections.” He faced down criticism from one audience member that he should not have extended his responsibility theme to include those who are disabled. In particular, she felt he was too hard on incapacity benefit claimants. Miliband was given a rough ride by the woman, who claimed he was “reinforcing the destructive rhetoric” of the coalition government on welfare by referring to someone he met who was on sickness benefits and who could have
Continue reading …