Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 96)
David Cameron speech: let’s show the world some fight

In keynote address to Conservative conference, prime minister sets out upbeat vision following week of sombre speeches by cabinet colleagues David Cameron invoked the spirit of the British bulldog and the days of empire as he pledged to provide the leadership to take Britain to better days. In an attempt to imitate the optimistic vision of Ronald Reagan’s Morning in America campaign , the prime minister said he would fight a climate of “sogginess” which says Britain faces certain decline. “Britain never had the biggest population, the largest land mass, the richest resources – but we had the spirit,” the prime minister said in his keynote speech to the Conservative conference in Manchester. Referring to the British bulldog, Cameron added: “Remember, it’s not the size of the dog in the fight – it’s the size of the fight in the dog. Overcoming challenge, confounding the sceptics, reinventing ourselves, this is what we do. It’s called leadership.” Tory strategists decided the prime minister would use his speech to set out an upbeat and optimistic vision after a week of sombre speeches by ministers and notably by the chancellor, George Osborne. Cameron echoed Osborne when he said Britain faced a long struggle to revive the economy. “People want to know why the good times are so long coming,” he said. “The answer is straightforward, but uncomfortable. This was no normal recession – we’re in a debt crisis. It was caused by too much borrowing by individuals, businesses, banks and, most of all, governments.” As Downing Street confirmed earlier on Wednesday, the prime minister amended this sober section of his speech to tone down an apparent instruction to people to follow the example of the government and to pay off their credit cards. Instead, he said: “The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That’s why households are paying down their credit card and store card bills.” Cameron challenged Labour, which accuses the government of imposing spending cuts too quickly and too soon, by putting his deficit reduction plans within the tradition of moderate “one nation Conservatism” embodied by his political hero, Harold Macmillan. “This is a one-nation deficit reduction plan from a one-nation party,” he said. Having established the economic challenge facing Britain, the prime minister started to outline his upbeat vision as he pledged to reject pessimism and promote “can-do optimism”. The Tories illustrated this approach by inviting young people who have taken part in the National Citizens’ Service initiative to address the conference. But he said there was a downbeat mood and he would fight it. “Frankly, there’s too much ‘can’t do’ sogginess around,” he told delegates. “We need to be a sharp, focused, can-do country. But as we go for growth, the last thing I want is to pump the old economy back up, with a banking sector out of control, manufacturing squeezed, and prosperity confined to a few parts of the country and a select few industries. “Our plan is to build something new and to build something better. We can do it.” The prime minister cited health and safety rules as an example of how Britain was being held back. “This isn’t how a great nation was built,” he said. “Britannia didn’t rule the waves with armbands on.” Picking up on his theme of the empire, he said he would try to revive the spirit that allowed Britain to find a new role after the collapse of its empire. “They said when we lost an empire that we couldn’t find a role. But we found a role, took on communism and helped bring down the Berlin Wall,” he said. “They called our economy the sick man of Europe. But we came back and turned this country into a beacon of enterprise.” In his concluding remarks, Cameron said: “Let’s turn this time of challenge into a time of opportunity. Not sitting around watching things happen and wondering why, but standing up, making things happen and asking: ‘Why not?’. “We have the people, we have the ideas, and now we have a government that’s freeing those people, backing those ideas. So let’s see an optimistic future. Let’s show the world some fight. Let’s pull together, work together. And together lead Britain to better days.” Cameron’s speech outlined how key government reforms would help: • In education, there will be an emphasis on “core and vital subjects”, he said as he hailed the new free schools established by the education secretary, Michael Gove. “Change really is under way,” he added. “For the first time in a long time, the numbers studying those core and vital subjects history, geography, languages are going up. “Pupils’ exams will be marked on their punctuation and grammar. And teachers are going to be able to search pupils’ bags for anything banned in school – mobile phones, alcohol, weapons, anything. It’s a long, hard road back to rigour, but we’re well and truly on our way.” • On welfare reform, Cameron promised to return sense to the labour market and get people back to work, with a focus on people on incapacity benefit. “Under Labour, they got something for nothing,” he said. “With us, they’ll only get something if they give something. If they are prepared to work, we’re going to help them, and I mean really help them. “If you’ve been out of work and on benefits for five years, a quick session down the jobcentre and a new CV just isn’t going to cut it. You need to get your self-esteem and confidence back. You need training and skills, intensive personal support.” • On planning, the government would listen to people’s concerns about the changes, he said, adding that the government would do nothing to harm the countryside. But he said that it was important to ease the planning process, adding: “To those who just oppose everything we’re doing, my message is this: take your arguments down to the job centre. We’ve got to get Britain back to work.” Conservative conference 2011 David Cameron Conservative conference Conservatives Economic policy Recession Economics Communities Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
NBC Celebrates ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Protests ‘Gaining Ground’

At the top of the 8 a.m. ET hour of Wednesday's NBC “Today,” fill-in news anchor Tamron Hall proclaimed: “Today could be the biggest day yet for the 'Occupy Wall Street' protests in lower Manhattan.” Correspondent Mara Schiavocampo followed by gushing: “Three weeks in, and no signs of slowing. The 'Occupy Wall Street' protest growing in size and scope.” Schiavocampo touted how the “coalition is growing quickly, as several labor unions have now vowed to join demonstrators in their protests against corporate interests….demonstrations spreading to more than 50 cities, from Boston to Los Angeles.” The headline on screen throughout the report cheered: “Gaining Ground; 'Occupy Wall Street' Protests Spreading.” Promoting an upcoming rally by the left-wing group, Schiavocampo declared it “could be their largest event yet.” She then observed: “The grassroots movement has no official leaders.” On the April 16, 2009 NBC “Nightly News,” the day after nationwide Tea Party tax day protests, correspondent Lee Cowan attempted to discredit the grassroots nature of the movement: “Organizers insist today’s 'tea parties' were organic uprisings of like-minded taxpayers from both parties….But some observers suggest not all of it was as home-grown as it may seem.” Near the end of Schiavocampo's Wednesday report, liberal Washington Post writer Jonathan Capehart offered some advice to the unfocused protesters: “'Occupy Wall Street,' if it wants to be successful, they're going to have to zero in on specific pieces of legislation.” Schiavocampo concluded the segment by passing along a request from the leftist activists: “Organizers are also hoping students will join them in today's events. They're asking college students across the country to walk out of class at 2:00 this afternoon, in a show of solidarity.” Over the past week, NBC has continually pumped up the liberal movement , even suggesting it was the equivalent of the Tea Party. Here is a full transcript of the October 5 report: 8:02AM ET TAMRON HALL: Today could be the biggest day yet for the “Occupy Wall Street” protests in lower Manhattan. NBC's Mara Schiavocampo is there with more. Mara, good morning. MARA SCHIAVOCAMPO: Tamron, good morning. Protest organizers say they are expecting thousands today for a rally and march here in lower Manhattan. The “Occupy Wall Street” coalition is growing quickly, as several labor unions have now vowed to join demonstrators in their protests against corporate interests. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Gaining Ground; "Occupy Wall Street" Protests Spreading] Three weeks in, and no signs of slowing. The “Occupy Wall Street” protest growing in size and scope. Hundreds gathering to vent their frustration at big banks and corporations, demonstrations spreading to more than 50 cities, from Boston to Los Angeles. Protesters now joined by some very influential allies. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: We are powerful, thank you! SCHIAVOCAMPO: Tuesday, several labor unions, including transit workers and teachers, joined activists for a march to Wall Street. Today they plan to join protesters in what could be their largest event yet, a rally and march in lower Manhattan. The grassroots movement has no official leaders. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: We the people are here to take the power back. SCHIAVOCAMPO: While their frustration is clear, their goals are not. JONATHAN CAPEHART [WASHINGTON POST]: “Occupy Wall Street,” if it wants to be successful, they're going to have to zero in on specific pieces of legislation. SCHIAVOCAMPO: A movement still taking shape as it continues to grow. Organizers are also hoping students will join them in today's events. They're asking college students across the country to walk out of class at 2:00 this afternoon, in a show of solidarity. Tamron. HALL: Alright, Mara, thank you.

Continue reading …

Filmed interrogation raises ethical questions over treatment of Omar Khadr, arrested in Afghanistan in 2002 and still in custody The footage is shocking: grainy film shows a slim teenage boy, hunched into himself under the spotlight of a bare interrogation cell. “You don’t care about me,” he tells his interrogators, again and again. After they leave, the ceiling-mounted camera records his racking sobs, just audible over the hum of the air-conditioner. At the time of this interrogation in Guantánamo Bay, February 2003, the boy, Omar Khadr, a Canadian national, was barely 16, yet he had already been in military custody for seven months. Now 25, he remains in the US detention centre, though he will soon be transferred to a prison in Canada in deal which led him to plead guilty last year to war crimes . As far as the Pentagon is concerned, Khadr’s case is closed. But a film about his interrogation , released in the UK this week, raises a series of deeply troubling questions. Firstly, it asks, why did the US try a child, captured in Afghanistan aged just 15, when UN treaties decree underage combatants be treated as victims? How reliable was a confession Khadr says was extracted under torture and, it emerged later, tacit threats of gang rape ? The film, You Don’t Like the Truth: Four Days Inside Guantánamo, is released in the UK on Friday. It even casts doubt on the Pentagon’s claims that Khadr was responsible for killing a US solder, the incident for which he was tried. Dennis Edney, a prominent Canadian human rights lawyer who represented Khadr until earlier this year, says he remains dismayed by the attitude of both the US government and that of Canada, which has repeatedly refused to agitate on Khadr’s behalf. “When governments won’t stand up to this prosecution of a child soldier, who will stand up to it?” he said. “If you can’t protect the most vulnerable in society – which are children – then what is it that you do stand for? It says so much about who we are.” Khadr was captured by US forces in July 2002 near the eastern Afghan city of Khost following a fierce battle between US troops and militants into whose care the boy had been placed by his father, Ahmed Khadr, an Egyptian born aid worker who repeatedly shuttled his family between Canada and Afghanistan, where he was an al-Qaida associate and alleged financier. According to US military prosecutors, during the battle a grenade thrown by Khadr fatally injured an American sergeant, Christopher Speer. But photographs which emerged in 2009 appear to show the boy lying unconscious in the bombed-out compound at the time he supposedly committed the act. The boy, then aged 15, was partly blinded and suffered severe back and shoulder injuries in the battle. He was taken first to the Bagram airbase, where interrogation commenced, and then Guantánamo. The four days of questioning by Canadian intelligence officials which features heavily in the film shows a clearly traumatised Khadr initially admitting to having met Osama bin Laden before saying he made this up as he feared more torture. Several times he breaks down in sobs, at one point seemingly calling for his mother. The Pentagon forbids public release of photographs or recordings inside but in 2008 Khadr’s legal team won a US supreme court ruling for disclosure of several hours of footage . Moazzam Begg , a British former Guantánamo detainee who spent time with Khadr during their initial incarceration at Bagram, said the teenager also told him he believed no one cared for his plight. Begg told the film-makers: “That will remain with me forever. The pity that I felt for him, I’ve never felt for anyone that I saw during all the time in Guantánamo and Bagram.” Edney recounted meeting Khadr, then 17, for the first time. “What did I see? I saw a boy chained to a floor in a solitary confinement cell, blind in one eye and still seriously injured. “I could not believe what I was seeing. I’m a very experienced lawyer. Not much shocks me. But if what happens in Guantánamo Bay doesn’t shock you then you’ve got problems.” Khadr’s eventual hearing before one of the controversial military tribunals set up to try Guantánamo prisoners involved his defence portraying him as an impressionable child at the mercy of his father’s wishes. Prosecutors pointed to a video apparently showing Khadr helping make improvised bombs, saying he was mature enough to be responsible for his actions. Khadr had by then agreed to plead guilty in a deal to serve no more than eight years – all Edney will say of that decision is: “Who among us would not have pleaded out to get out of that hellhole?” Now a strapping, bearded man rather than the slim boy of the video, Khadr seems set on seeing the sentence through, even though his confession means he remains a public pariah in Canada. This is despite the repeated insistence of Unicef and the UN’s special representative for child soldiers, Radhika Coomaraswamy, that the only people guilty of war crimes were the adults who coerced a boy into fighting. The US undertook the first war crimes prosecution of a minor since the second world war, Coomaraswamy said . “Child soldiers must be treated primarily as victims and alternative procedures should be in place aimed at rehabilitation or restorative justice.” Guantánamo Bay Canada Moazzam Begg al-Qaida US military Afghanistan Global terrorism United States US foreign policy US national security United Nations US constitution and civil liberties Human rights Peter Walker guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

I was the approximate age demographic when Sesame Street debuted in 1969. But I wasn’t the target audience. Sesame Street was created to assist children–particularly from low-income families–with basic letter recognition and other cognitive skills before they entered kindergarten. Over the intervening 40 plus years, Sesame Street has modified its initial mission statement to introduce the concepts of tolerance, social diversity, conflict resolution and handled some really big picture ideas like the death of a loved one, coming back after natural disasters, marriages, births, adoptions and even September 11th. This year, the good people of the Sesame Workshop have decided that they need to address another issue affecting Americans: food insecurity . The iconic kids show is set to unveil a new impoverished puppet named Lily, whose family faces an ongoing struggle with hunger issues. Lily will be revealed in a one-hour Sesame Street primetime special, Growing Hope Against Hunger , which is being sponsored by Walmart. The special will star country singer Brad Paisley and his wife Kimberly Williams Paisley, as well as the Sesame Street Muppets. “Food insecurity is a growing and difficult issue for adults to discuss, much less children,” said the Paisleys in a statement. “We are honored that Sesame Street , with its long history of tackling difficult issues with sensitivity, caring and warmth asked us to be a part of this important project.” The special will share the stories of real-life families to raise awareness of hunger issues in the United States, as well as strategies that have helped these families find food. The United States Department of Agriculture estimates that 17 million American children — nearly 1 in 4 — have limited or uncertain access to affordable and nutritious food. Let me repeat this: ONE IN FOUR CHILDREN are hungry . This is not some third-world, banana republic nation. This is not some resource- and agriculturally-poor country dependent upon foreign aid. This is the wealthiest nation in the world. This is unacceptable. Poor nutrition has been linked to a vast array of health and cognitive issues , which can then be linked to a host of societal ills, the circle of poverty, neglect, crime and punishment continuing generation after generation. The wealthiest country in the world. Unacceptable. If you want to help, FeedingAmerica.org has ideas on what you can do.

Continue reading …
Daily Mail website incited abuse against Chris Huhne’s partner, court told

Carina Trimingham seeks to add harassment claim to privacy action over series of artlcles The Daily Mail has been accused in the high court of inciting users of its website to be abusive to the partner of government minister Chris Huhne. William Bennett, a barrister acting for Carina Trimingham in a privacy action against Daily Mail publisher Associated Newspapers, told the court on Wednesday that the alleged prejudicial nature of a series of articles which appeared in the paper last summer left her feeling persecuted and harassed. Bennett requested that his client’s privacy action against Associated Newspapers be amended to include an alleged breach of the Protection from Harassment Act. The hearing was then adjourned after Mr Justice Tugendhat agreed to amend Trimingham’s claim, but said it was unrealistic to hear the additional action without giving Associated time to analyse and defend it. Associated’s barrister, Antony White QC, had earlier objected to the addition of the harassment claim and sought an adjournment at Trimingham’s expense. White said that he had no advance warning of Trimingham’s harassment claim and it was “unfair to be bounced on day two of the trial into a different claim without having had an opportunity to consider the particulars of the fresh allegations”. Trimingham’s privacy action relates to a series of eight articles about her relationship with Huhne, which she claims breached the Press Complaints Commission code of practice for journalists, which prohibits the mention of a person’s sexuality unless relevant. Bennett said the articles, one of which included a wedding photo from a previous marriage, also breached her rights to a “reasonable expectation of privacy”. He added that he had identified a further 39 articles containing alleged “homophobic prejudice” that were “likely to stimulate an abusive reaction” from Daily Mail readers and users of the Mail Online website. “Readers’ comments – all 58 of them are all abusive in character,” he claimed. “The Daily Mail incites its readers to be abusive because of the tone of its articles.” Bennett said his client was “subjected to vile abuse on the readers’ comments pages”. •

Continue reading …
Hague accuses Russia and China of ‘siding with brutal regime’ in Syria

Foreign secretary says decision of Russia and China to veto UN resolution calling on Bashar al-Assad’s regime to stop violence is ‘deeply mistaken and regrettable’ William Hague, the foreign secretary, has accused Russia and China of “siding with a brutal regime” by vetoing a UN security council resolution calling on Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria to stop the violence towards its own people. Hague used his keynote speech at the Conservative party conference to describe the decision as “deeply mistaken and regrettable”. Hague spoke out against the veto as he hailed the British government’s role in the Arab spring and called on governments in the Middle East and beyond to respond to grievances from their public with “dialogue and reform, not with repression”. On the repression taking place in Syria at the hands of president Bashar al-Assad’s regime, Hague said: “Last night we and our European allies tabled a resolution in the UN security council calling on the Assad regime to stop the violence in Syria, after months of utterly unacceptable killings, torture and abuses. “The decision of Russia and China to veto this resolution, and to side with the brutal regime rather than with the people of Syria is deeply mistaken and regrettable. We will redouble our efforts to work with other nations to increase the pressure on the regime wherever we can, and assure the people of Syria that they will not be forgotten.” Hague outlined Britain’s foreign policy under the coalition government, which he said was built on giving Britain “the leadership it needs to thrive as a confident, outward looking prosperous bold nation”. He also praised David Cameron for showing the “steel and humanity” needed to support the people of Libya. In a direct swipe at the Labour government and the controversy over the run-up to the Iraq invasion, Hague contrasted the approach taken to support the people’s uprising earlier this year. “When the hour of crisis came, our prime minister had the steel and the humanity to call for a no-fly zone, when others doubted. We persuaded other world leaders to join us and to act; and we sought no diplomatic shortcuts and relied on no dodgy dossier to win the argument. “Backed by the very best of British diplomacy, we secured what many said was impossible: an unequivocal UN security council resolution authorising military force, strong regional support from Arab nations, and a military operation that was limited, legal, morally right and successful. “There were those who said there was no chance of getting a security council resolution, that the situation in Libya was a stalemate and that Tripoli would not fall; but with patience and determination we and above all the Libyan people proved them wrong.” He said Britain was helping the Libyan people to rebuild their country themselves. “Not with an occupying force, but with diplomatic and technical assistance, not by imposing our blueprint, but on the basis of their own plans. We can be proud of our diplomats, our armed forces, our intelligence services and our country for helping Libyans to win their own freedom.” He said “a new, bold and ambitious relationship” needs to be fostered with the countries of the Middle East and north Africa, in the European Union, the United Nations and the G8, “so that as they grow in freedom they can join us in prosperity”. As efforts to resolve the eurozone crisis continue, Hague told Conservative delegates that the party had been right to warn at the time that entering the euro would be a disaster, and to say that no more areas of power should be handed over to Europe. He said: “Thanks to the European Union Act 2011 by law that cannot happen without a referendum. And we are just as right that the EU has no more power in our national life than it should, and I believe as strongly as I ever have that when the right moments come this party should set out to reduce it.” But Hague, a former hardline Eurosceptic, reminded delegates that he first said 14 years ago that the eurozone would become a “burning building with no exits”. But he said it was important to support the eurozone countries to quench the flames both because they are “friends and neighbours”, but also because Britain’s prosperity and financial stability is tied in with theirs. “But we will never make the mistake of thinking that anyone else can be relied upon to stand up for the interests of Britain,” he said. “We will continue to work closely with our European allies, and in particular in our defence treaties with France we have forged the closest relationship with our neighbour since the second world war. We pay tribute to the forceful and effective leadership of President Sarkozy.” But he added that Britain’s defence would continue to be “anchored in our unbreakable alliance with the United States and the primacy of Nato”. “That is why when others proposed an EU military headquarters this summer, on behalf of the United Kingdom I vetoed it.” In a well received speech, he told delegates the Conservatives had brought a new energy to British diplomacy. Highlighting the decision to reopen a language centre in the Foreign Office and to drive through a buildup of traditional diplomatic skills of negotiations and analysis, he said: “If we have these skills as a nation when we want to negotiate a treaty it will be done correctly; when we want a trade deal it will be won; when we intervene overseas we will do so successfully, and so we will ensure in 20 years’ time Britain’s Foreign Office will remain the best diplomatic service in the world.” On Afghanistan, Hague said the government would do all it could to promote reconciliation and governance in Afghanistan as Afghans increasingly take responsibility for their own security as British forces prepare to wind down their role by 2014. William Hague Russia Europe China Syria Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest United Nations Foreign policy Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Conservatives Bashar Al-Assad Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Hague accuses Russia and China of ‘siding with brutal regime’ in Syria

Foreign secretary says decision of Russia and China to veto UN resolution calling on Bashar al-Assad’s regime to stop violence is ‘deeply mistaken and regrettable’ William Hague, the foreign secretary, has accused Russia and China of “siding with a brutal regime” by vetoing a UN security council resolution calling on Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria to stop the violence towards its own people. Hague used his keynote speech at the Conservative party conference to describe the decision as “deeply mistaken and regrettable”. Hague spoke out against the veto as he hailed the British government’s role in the Arab spring and called on governments in the Middle East and beyond to respond to grievances from their public with “dialogue and reform, not with repression”. On the repression taking place in Syria at the hands of president Bashar al-Assad’s regime, Hague said: “Last night we and our European allies tabled a resolution in the UN security council calling on the Assad regime to stop the violence in Syria, after months of utterly unacceptable killings, torture and abuses. “The decision of Russia and China to veto this resolution, and to side with the brutal regime rather than with the people of Syria is deeply mistaken and regrettable. We will redouble our efforts to work with other nations to increase the pressure on the regime wherever we can, and assure the people of Syria that they will not be forgotten.” Hague outlined Britain’s foreign policy under the coalition government, which he said was built on giving Britain “the leadership it needs to thrive as a confident, outward looking prosperous bold nation”. He also praised David Cameron for showing the “steel and humanity” needed to support the people of Libya. In a direct swipe at the Labour government and the controversy over the run-up to the Iraq invasion, Hague contrasted the approach taken to support the people’s uprising earlier this year. “When the hour of crisis came, our prime minister had the steel and the humanity to call for a no-fly zone, when others doubted. We persuaded other world leaders to join us and to act; and we sought no diplomatic shortcuts and relied on no dodgy dossier to win the argument. “Backed by the very best of British diplomacy, we secured what many said was impossible: an unequivocal UN security council resolution authorising military force, strong regional support from Arab nations, and a military operation that was limited, legal, morally right and successful. “There were those who said there was no chance of getting a security council resolution, that the situation in Libya was a stalemate and that Tripoli would not fall; but with patience and determination we and above all the Libyan people proved them wrong.” He said Britain was helping the Libyan people to rebuild their country themselves. “Not with an occupying force, but with diplomatic and technical assistance, not by imposing our blueprint, but on the basis of their own plans. We can be proud of our diplomats, our armed forces, our intelligence services and our country for helping Libyans to win their own freedom.” He said “a new, bold and ambitious relationship” needs to be fostered with the countries of the Middle East and north Africa, in the European Union, the United Nations and the G8, “so that as they grow in freedom they can join us in prosperity”. As efforts to resolve the eurozone crisis continue, Hague told Conservative delegates that the party had been right to warn at the time that entering the euro would be a disaster, and to say that no more areas of power should be handed over to Europe. He said: “Thanks to the European Union Act 2011 by law that cannot happen without a referendum. And we are just as right that the EU has no more power in our national life than it should, and I believe as strongly as I ever have that when the right moments come this party should set out to reduce it.” But Hague, a former hardline Eurosceptic, reminded delegates that he first said 14 years ago that the eurozone would become a “burning building with no exits”. But he said it was important to support the eurozone countries to quench the flames both because they are “friends and neighbours”, but also because Britain’s prosperity and financial stability is tied in with theirs. “But we will never make the mistake of thinking that anyone else can be relied upon to stand up for the interests of Britain,” he said. “We will continue to work closely with our European allies, and in particular in our defence treaties with France we have forged the closest relationship with our neighbour since the second world war. We pay tribute to the forceful and effective leadership of President Sarkozy.” But he added that Britain’s defence would continue to be “anchored in our unbreakable alliance with the United States and the primacy of Nato”. “That is why when others proposed an EU military headquarters this summer, on behalf of the United Kingdom I vetoed it.” In a well received speech, he told delegates the Conservatives had brought a new energy to British diplomacy. Highlighting the decision to reopen a language centre in the Foreign Office and to drive through a buildup of traditional diplomatic skills of negotiations and analysis, he said: “If we have these skills as a nation when we want to negotiate a treaty it will be done correctly; when we want a trade deal it will be won; when we intervene overseas we will do so successfully, and so we will ensure in 20 years’ time Britain’s Foreign Office will remain the best diplomatic service in the world.” On Afghanistan, Hague said the government would do all it could to promote reconciliation and governance in Afghanistan as Afghans increasingly take responsibility for their own security as British forces prepare to wind down their role by 2014. William Hague Russia Europe China Syria Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest United Nations Foreign policy Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Conservatives Bashar Al-Assad Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Conservative party conference 2011: live coverage

• Liam Fox’s speech – summary • William Hague’s speech – summary • Lunchtime summary 3.21pm: Cameron explains his growth plan. Dealing with our debts is line one, clause one of our plan for growth. But it is just the start. We need jobs – and we won’t get jobs by growing government, we need to grow our businesses. So here’s our growth plan: doing everything we can to help businesses start, grow, thrive, succeed. Where that means backing off, cutting regulation – back off, cut regulation. Where that means intervention, investment – intervene, invest. Whatever it takes to help our businesses take on the world – we’ll do it. The global economy has transformed in recent years. It used to take companies decades to become global giants: now it can take a couple of years. When you step off the plane in Delhi or Shanghai or Lagos, you can feel the energy, the hunger, the drive to succeed. We need that here. He complains about negative thinking – or “can’t do sogginess”, as he calls it. Frankly, there’s too much ‘can’t do’ sogginess around. We need to be a sharp, focused, can-do country. But as we go for growth, the last thing I want is to pump the old economy back up, with a banking sector out of control, manufacturing squeezed, and prosperity confined to a few parts of the country and a select few industries. Our plan is to build something new and to build something better. We can do it. 3.19pm: Cameron turns to the NHS. The NHS is the most precious institution in our country – to my family, to your family. At the last election, it was Labour policy to cut the NHS. It was Liberal Democrat policy to cut the NHS. It was our policy – Conservative policy – to protect the NHS and spend more on it this year, next year and the year after that because we are the party of the NHS, and as long as I’m here we always will be. And he has a message for the unions planning to go on strike over public sector pensions. You have every right to protest. But our population is ageing. Our public sector pensions system is unaffordable. The only way to give public sector workers a decent, sustainable pensions system, and do right by the taxpayer, is to ask public servants to work a little longer and contribute a little more. That is fair. What is not fair, what is not right, is going on strikes that will hurt the very people who help pay for your pensions. 3.17pm: Cameron says that he has insisted on cutting the deficit in a way that is fair. You can’t cut a deficit the size of ours without everyone making a sacrifice. But those with the most money are bearing the biggest burden. We’ve imposed a permanent levy on the banks, getting them to pay more every year than Labour did in one year. We’ve raised taxes on people who make their money overseas but live here. At the same time we’ve given real help to the poorest and most vulnerable. We’re taking over a million of the lowest-paid people out of tax altogether. And after the scandal of the 75p pension rise under Labour, we’re linking pensions to earnings so elderly people will be £10,000 better off in their retirement. Yes, this is a one-nation deficit reduction plan – from a one-nation party. That’s interesting – a very explicit commitment to one nation Conservatism. 3.16pm: Cameron turns to Labour. Of course, our deficit reduction programme is just one big bail-out of the last Labour government. This past year we’ve been subjected to a sort of national apology tour by Labour. Sorry for sucking up to Qadhafi. For not regulating the banks properly. For crushing civil liberties. For failing to go green. For not building enough homes. For the infighting that made them the most dysfunctional government ever. But you know what? Nothing – not a peep – on the thing they really need to say sorry for. Wasting billions and billions of your money. No apology for that. And now he turns to the man he dubbed the most annoying politician in Britain. You know what the Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls claimed last week? That Labour didn’t spend more money than they had “available”. Hello? Ed – you spent £428 billion more than you had “available”. There is only one conclusion you can rationally draw. We must never let these Labour politicians anywhere near our economy again. 3.15pm: Cameron says that while he is prime minister, Britain will never join the euro. And he sets out his approach to EU bail outs. But when it comes to any Euro bail-out mechanism, my approach is simple: Labour got us into it and I’ve made sure we’re getting out of it. 3.12pm: Cameron is now talking about the economy. He lists some measures the government is taking to help. But he says this recovery will not be like a normal economic recovery. The answer is straightforward, but uncomfortable. This was no normal recession; we’re in a debt crisis. It was caused by too much borrowing, by individuals, businesses, banks, and most of all, governments. When you’re in a debt crisis, some of the normal things that government can do, to deal with a normal recession, like borrowing to cut taxes or increase spending – these things won’t work because they lead to more debt, which would make the crisis worse. Why? Because it risks higher interest rates, less confidence and the threat of even higher taxes in future. The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That’s why households are paying down their credit card and store card bills. It means banks getting their books in order. And it means governments – all over the world – cutting spending and living within their means. That’s the rewritten passage. Cameron says he and Nick Clegg have led the way towards recovery. Our plan is right. And our plan will work. I know you can’t see it or feel it yet. But think of it like this. The new economy we’re building: it’s like building a house. The most important part is the part you can’t see – the foundations that make it stable. Slowly, but surely, we’re laying the foundations for a better future. But this is the crucial point: it will only work if we stick with it. 3.09pm: Cameron is in a patriotic vein. Some say that to succeed in this world, we need to become more like India, or China, or Brazil. I say: we need to become more like us. The real us. Hard-working, pioneering, independent, creative, adaptable, optimistic, can-do. That’s the spirit that has made this United Kingdom what it is: a small country that does great things; one of the most incredible success stories in the history of the world. He mentions communities heroes, like Dan Thompson, who lead a clean up operation after the riots. Leadership works, Cameron says. I know how tough things are. I don’t for one minute underestimate how worried people feel, whether about making ends meet, or the state of the world economy. But the truth is, right now we need to be energised, not paralysed by gloom and fear. Half the world is booming – let’s go and sell to them. So many of our communities are thriving – let’s make the rest like them. There’s so much that’s great about our country. We don’t have to accept that success in this century automatically belongs to someone else. We just have to remember the origin of our achievements: the people of Britain, taking a lead. That’s why so much of my leadership is about unleashing your leadership. Giving everyone who wants to seize it the opportunity, the support and above all the freedom to get things done. Giving everyone who wants to believe it the confidence that working hard and taking responsibility will be rewarded not punished. 3.06pm: Cameron is now on leadership, which is one of the big themes of the speech. Leadership in fighting poverty. Leadership in fighting tyranny. But when it came to that decision to help the Libyan people, there was something dispiriting about the debate here at home. It wasn’t that some people thought we shouldn’t do what we did – of course it’s everyone’s right to disagree. It was that too many thought Britain actually couldn’t do something like that any more. And you hear that kind of pessimism about our economic future, our social problems, our political system. That our best days are behind us. That we’re on a path of certain decline. Well I’m here to tell you that it isn’t true. Of course, if we sit around and hope for the best, the rest will leave us behind. If we fool ourselves that we can grow our economy, mend our society, give our children the future we want them to have. If we fool ourselves that we can do these things without effort, without correcting past mistakes, without confronting vested interests and failed ideas, then no, we’re not going to get anywhere. But if we put in the effort, correct those mistakes, confront those vested interests and take on the failed ideas of the past, then I know we can turn this ship around. Nobody wants false optimism. And I will never pretend there are short cuts to success. But success will come: with the right ideas, the right approach, the right leadership. Leadership from government: to set out the direction we must take, and the choices we must make. But leadership also from you. Because the things that will really deliver success are not politicians or government. It’s the people of Britain, and the spirit of Britain. 3.05pm: Cameron turns to Libya. This is a party – ours is a country – that never walks on by. Earlier this year some people said to me: “Libya’s not our concern”, “don’t start what you can’t finish”, and even – “Arabs don’t do democracy.” But if we had stood aside this spring, people in Benghazi would have been massacred. And don’t let anyone say this wasn’t in our national interest. Remember what Qadhafi did. He’s the man who gave Semtex to the IRA, who was behind the shooting of a police officer in a London square, who was responsible for the bombing of a plane in the skies over Lockerbie. Let’s be proud of the part we played in giving the Libyan people the chance to take back their country. In Afghanistan today, there are men and women fighting for Britain as bravely as any in our history. They come from across our country: England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland. They now have the equipment they need. And we’re on target to bring them home by the end of 2014. Theirs has been a campaign of incredible courage and sacrifice, and I know everyone in this hall will want to send a message to everyone who serves and who have served. Those in uniform in our armed forces and in our police. And those not in uniform, keeping us safe from terrorism on our streets. He defends Britain’s aid spending, which is unpopular with activists. It is the “right thing to do”, he says. That it’s a mark of our country, and our people, that we never turn our backs on the world’s poorest, and everyone in Britain can be incredibly proud of it. 3.02pm: Cameron is now making jokes about the books that members of the cabinet could record. As their social action project, Conservatives have been recording books for the blind this week. This passage is not in the text released to journalists. Here are Cameron’s suggetions. Geoge Osborne – The Man who Would be King. Boris Johnson – The Joy of …. Cycling. Kenneth Clarke – Crime and Punishment. 2.59pm: Cameron says the people have “very clear instructions” for this government. “Lead us out of this economic mess.” “Do it in a way that’s fair and right.” “And as you do it, make sure you build something worthwhile for us and our children.” (This reminds me of the rhetorical device he used in his speech announcing changes to the health bill: You told us to do X, we did it.) Cameron goes on: Clear instructions. Clear objectives. And from me: a clear understanding that in these difficult times, it is leadership we need. To get our economy moving. To get our society working, and in a year – the Olympics year – when the world will be watching us, to show everyone what Great Britain really means. And he thanks the activists for their record in elections. But first I want to say something to you in this hall. Thank you. Despite the predictions we won elections all over the country this May, so let’s hear it for those great campaigns you fought and the great results you achieved. And thank you for something else. In the AV referendum, you did Britain a service and kicked that useless voting system off the political agenda for decades to come. And next year let’s make sure we back Boris, beat Ken and keep London Conservative. You’re not just winners – you’re doers. 2.58pm: Cameron starts by commending his party for their discipline. This week, in Manchester, this party has shown the discipline, the unity, and the purpose that is the mark of a party of government. I’m proud of my team, I’m proud of our members, I’m proud to lead this party – but most of all, I’m proud of you. 2.57pm: At last the warm up is over. He’s on. 2.57pm: And now they are showing footage of Cameron visiting Tripoli. 2.56pm: Now they’re showing footage of Cameron visiting Egypt and addressing British troops in Afghanistan. 2.55pm: The video covers the AV campaign, the Conservative project in Rwanda and PMQs. They show Cameron’s “I’d rather be the child of Thatcher than the son of Brown” clip. 2.54pm: Another video presentation. It won’t be long now before Cameron starts. 2.53pm: My colleague Paul Owen is tweeting the events from within the hall. 2.47pm: Shaun Bailey, a Conservative candidate at the last election and one of David Cameron’s Big Society ambassadors, is speaking now. He is introducing two young people who are talking about the National Citizens Service, the volunteering scheme that Cameron wants to roll out nationwide. 2.35pm: Mary Ann Sieghart has just posted this on Twitter. Never seen a conference hall with empty seats for a Tory leader’s speech before. Whole empty rows today #cpc11 2.31pm: The afternoon session is starting. They are showing the party political broadcast that the Conservatives are using to urge people to give money to east African famine relief. 2.25pm: David Cameron is walking into the conference hall now. 2.18pm: The hall in Manchester is filling up. David Cameron is due to speak in about 20 minutes. 1.38pm: Here’s a lunchtime summary. • David Cameron hastily rewritten his conference speech to remove any suggestion that he is either urging or instructing the public to pay off their credit card bills . (See 12.37pm and 1.16pm.) • William Hague, the foreign secretary, has criticised Russia and China for vetoing an anti-Syria resolution at the UN. “The decision of Russia and China to veto this resolution, and to side with the brutal regime rather than with the people of Syria is deeply mistaken and regrettable,” Hague said. (See 12.56pm.) • Hague has said that the Conservatives will try to repatriate powers from the EU to Britain when “the right moment” comes. When we said that no more areas of power should go to the EU we were right. And now thanks to the European Union Act 2011, by law that cannot happen without a referendum. And we are just as right that the EU has more power in our national life than it should, and I believe as strongly as I ever have that when the right moment comes this party should set out to reduce it. • Liam Fox, the defence secretary, has warned that any attempt to further EU defence integration could undermine Nato . (See 11.49am.) • The Office for National Statistics has halved its estimate for growth in the second quarter of 2011 . It is now saying the economy only grew by 0.1% from April to June. • Primal Scream have attacked Theresa May for playing one of their songs at the end of her speech yesterday. As the Press Association, May chose the Glasgow outfit’s 1994 hit Rocks – featuring explicit lyrics about drug taking and prostitution – to play at the end of her speech. The band said it was not only an inappropriate theme but an insult to their own politics to have been associated with the party, branding it a “sick association”. It said: “Primal Scream are totally disgusted that the Home Secretary Theresa May ended her speech at the Tory party conference with our song Rocks. How inappropriate. Didn’t they research the political history of our band? Hasn’t she listened to the words? Does she even know what getting your rocks off means? No. She is a Tory; how could she?” 1.16pm: The Conservatives are now in full damage limitation mode. Ministers are taking to the airwaves to play down the consequences of the credit card gaffe. Yesterday aides said that Cameron would include this passage in his speech. The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That means households – all of us – paying off the credit card and store card bills. That was interpreted as Cameron telling people they should pay off their debts There are three reason why this was damaging. 1. People don’t like politicians lecturing them about their household finances. They don’t mind politicians moralising on subjects like bankers, but telling ordinary people what to do with their money is almost always a mistake. 2. It reminded voters that someone like Cameron – a well-paid professional with family wealth – finds it much easier to pay off his credit card debt than most ordinary people. 3. It doesn’t make economic sense. As Polly Curtis explains on her Reality Check blog, if want the economy to grow, you need people to spend money. Now the speech has been rewritten to make it clear that Cameron is not telling people what to do about their debt (see 12.37pm) and ministers are giving interviews saying this was never his intention. Andrew Mitchell, the international development secretary, told the BBC that people should “manage their own budgets in their own way”. And David Willetts, the universities minister, told the World at One that it was not unusual for speeches to change. I’ve been involved in this process in the party and the fact is drafts circulate, drafts get altered. I used to do some speech writing for Margaret Thatcher and I tell you, you went through draft after draft. 12.56pm: Here are the main points from William Hague ‘s speech to the conference. • Hague attacked Russia and China for vetoing a UN security council resolution on Syria. We and our European allies tabled a resolution in the UN Security Council calling on the Assad regime to stop the violence in Syria, after months of utterly unacceptable killings, torture and abuses. The decision of Russia and China to veto this resolution, and to side with the brutal regime rather than with the people of Syria is deeply mistaken and regrettable. • He said that the coalition had abandoned the “sofa government” adopted by Labour. We have created a National Security Council which brings together the key ministers, the Chief of the Defence Staff, the heads of the intelligence agencies and on Libya alone has already met almost sixty times. We work together every day, we consult the experts, our decisions are formally and properly made. Sofa government is out and cabinet government is back. • He claimed he was reviving British foreign policy. We are opening six embassies and closing none. We are expanding our diplomatic presence in 22 countries. And we are breathing new life into old neglected alliances such as with Australia, New Zealand and Japan and working to reinvigorate that great institution the Commonwealth … It is the job of our diplomats to be immersed in the culture and history of other nations, not ensnared in management-speak. If we have these skills as a nation when we want to negotiate a Treaty it will be done correctly; when we want a Trade deal it will be won; when we intervene overseas we will do so successfully; and so we will ensure that in twenty years time Britain’s Foreign office will remain the best diplomatic service in the world. We have brought new energy to British diplomacy, with Foreign Office ministers visiting 97 countries since the general election, and I have visited nearly 40 countries myself. I have been the first Foreign Secretary to visit Australia since Douglas Hurd, the first ever to visit a united Yemen, the first to make bilateral visits to Tunisia and New Zealand in thirty years. • He described his approach to foreign policy as “liberal conservatism”. Our party’s view of foreign policy is guided by our liberal conservatism: our sense of optimism and unquenchable faith in human nature, coupled with respect for the history and culture of other nations. • He said time was “running out” for a two-state solution in the Middle East. “We urge the Israelis and Palestinians to return to negotiations,” he said. 12.37pm: David Cameron has rewritten his speech to make it clear that he is not telling the public how to arrange their personal finances. An aide is in the press room now saying that the words released yesterday have been “misinterpreted” and that Cameron wanted to make the point that people are already paying off their debts. This is what Cameron was going to say. (See 9.36am for the passage in full.) The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That means households – all of us – paying off the credit card and store card bills. It means banks getting their books in order. And this is what he is going to say now. That’s why households are paying down their credit card and store card bills. It was a cock-up, they admit. “Hands up,” one aide said. According to the OBR figures flagged up by Labour (see 11.36am), household debt is going up. But the Tories say those figures include mortgage debt. In other respects, people are paying off their debts, they say. They are going to dig out some figures for us to prove it. 12.29pm: My colleague Damian Carrington, the Guardian’s head of environment, has read my “10 things I’ve learnt from the Conservative party conference” post (see 11.12am) and told me that I’ve missed something out. The Conservatives now see the environment as a vote loser, not vote winner. How else to interpret George Osborne’s “carbon clanger”, when he appeared to reverse five years of Tory commitment to the UK being a leader in the global low carbon economy. Perhaps Cameron’s speech will enlighten us? 12.26pm: William Hague, the foreign secretary, is speaking in the conference hall now. He has just told members that “sofa government” is out. But, a colleague points out, “back of the sofa government” appears to be in – because, metaphorically, that is where George Osborne has found the money for all this week’s announcements. 12.24pm: According to the BBC’s Nick Robinson, David Cameron has rewritten the passage in his speech about credit card debt. “Sloppy drafting” is being blamed for the fact that he gave the impression that he appeared to be lecturing us on clearing our credit card debt. 12.16pm: After Liam Fox delivered his speech, the Tories showed a video message from Aung San Suu Kyi , the Burmese opposition leader. She recorded a message for the Labour conference saying that the Burmese appreciated the value of events like party conferences because they did not have any democracy of their own. It seemed like a tacit endorsement of Labour. But she said almost exactly the same thing in her message to the Tories. 11.49am: Liam Fox , the defence secretary, has finished his speech now. Here are the main points. • Fox dismissed the notion that the European Union should play a greater role in defence. There are those in Europe who are calling for the EU to take a greater role in Europe’s security. Let me tell you, Europe already has a guarantor of its defence—it’s called NATO. It is nonsense to duplicate and divert from NATO at a time when resources are scarce across Europe. And the last thing we need is more EU bureaucracy. • He attacked EU countries that do not fulfill their commitments to NATO. He did not name them, but that seemed to be a reference to Germany. You know, many of those calling for deeper EU defence integration are already failing to fulfil their commitments to NATO. My message to them is clear, you cannot expect to have the insurance policy but ask others to pay the premiums. NATO must maintain its primacy in European defence because NATO is the alliance that keeps the United States in Europe. This not a luxury, it is a necessity. • He said the Ministry of Defence cuts could not stop Britain being an important military power. “Even after the MoD’s contribution to deficit reduction we still have the fourth largest defence budget in the world and we will continue to be one of only five countries (out of 28) in NATO meeting our 2% GDP obligation,” he said. • He said that he had taken a grip on MoD procurement. For years there was no real-time control on major equipment programmes to stop spiralling costs and constant delays. There is now. The Major Projects Review Board monitors the progress of the top 20 equipment programmes. And let me tell you, those programmes and those companies that are not delivering are being named and shamed. • He said Britain was on course to withdraw combat troops from Afghanistan by 2015. The Afghan National Security Forces are growing in both size and, more importantly, capability—and are in many cases leading operations against the insurgency. And it’s because of the progress made by the Afghan security forces, and the improvement in the security situation, that 500 British troops will be brought home by the end of 2012. And no British troops will be in a combat role, or in the numbers they currently are, by 2015. • He said he wanted to increase the size of the Territorial Army by 50%. • He said the the government had set up a £30m community covenant scheme to fund local project connecting communities to the armed forces. Some 31 applications have already been made, he said. 11.36am: More on the credit card debt row. Labour have pointed out that the Office for Budget Responsibility expects household debt to go up, not down, between now and 2015. Here’s an extract from a report the OBR issued in April. Our March forecast shows household debt rising from £1.6 trillion in 2011 to £2.1 trillion in 2015, or from 160 per cent of disposable income to 175 per cent. Essentially, this reflects our expectation that household consumption and investment will rise more quickly than household disposable income over this period. We forecast that income growth will be constrained by a relatively weak wage response to higher-than-expected inflation. But we expect household to seek to protect their standard of living, relative to their earlier expectations, so that growth in household spending is not as weak as growth in household income. This requires households to borrow throughout the forecast period. 11.34am: In the conference hall Fox is telling Tories that next year will be the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War. The government will continue to guarantee the security of the Falklands, he says. This gives him the opportunity to praise Margaret Thatcher. 11.29am: Outside the conference hall, Labour have now pounced on David Cameron’s comments about credit card debt. Ian Austin, a shadow minister, has put out this statement. I think most people will look at what David Cameron is saying today and just think he’s completely out of touch. Of course people have got to be careful, but he’s got to understand that lots of ordinary families are really struggling at the moment with prices, VAT and unemployment going up, and they can’t afford to pay off their credit cards all in one go. 11.24am: Liam Fox, the defence secretary, is speaking in the conference hall now. He says he wants to increase the size of the Territorial Army by 50%. 11.12am: On the Today programme this morning the Daily Mail’s Iain Martin said that he thought this had been the most boring party conference since 1834. I wouldn’t go that far, but it’s probably fair to say that this is not one for the history books. Still, you shouldn’t spend four days at a conference without coming away with some conclusions. Here are the “10 things I’ve learnt from the Conservative conference”. 1. The economic crisis is overwhelming all government thinking – and ministers are not entirely in control. After the riots there were predictions that the party conference season would be dominated by debates about social breakdown, and what should be done to counter it. That debate never really materialised. The Tories have been talking about social issues this week (although not, to any great extent, the Big Society), but there is only one subject that really seems to matter. Outwardly there’s no panic, but there is a recognition that, to an extent, the government is at the mercy of outside events. When George Osborne declared on Monday that nothing would boost the British economy as much as a resolution of the eurozone crisis, he was admitting that Britain’s fate partly depends on Angela Merkel. 2. There won’t be a plan B. Senior Labour figures think the government will abandon its deficit reduction programme because growth is so anemic. But after this week it’s harder than ever to imagine that happening. It would be a “Black Wednesday” moment for the government, destroying its economic credibility in an instant. 3. David Cameron has a problem with women voters – but he doesn’t know what do to about it. As Allegra Stratton explains in her column today, polling shows that the government has a particular problem with women. Cameron tried to address this earlier this week with a bout of apologising, but, by focusing on his laddish remarks at PMQs, he missed the point. “It’s the economy, stupid.” Women are being hit by the cuts. Ministers understand the problem, but nothing came out of the conference that suggests they have found a proper way of addressing it. 4. Cameron has contained the Eurosceptics – but Europe is going to be a big election issue. Before the conference it was thought that the Eurosceptics would use it to aggressively demand a much tougher line on Europe. But the traditional Conservative conference Euro-row didn’t happen. That’s partly because the economy has overshadowed everything. (See 1.) But it is partly because Cameron has indicated that he would like to park this issue until the election, when the Conservatives will seek to use robust Euroscepticism as an electoral asset. 5. Cameron remains his party’s biggest asset. The conference slogan is: “Leadership for a Better Future.” The jury is still out on the “better future”, but Cameron is certainly providing leadership. Polling suggests that he is the only main party leader who actually attracts floating voters to his party and here at the conference support for him is very, very strong. 6. The Conservatives are doing their best not to let the Lib Dems depict them as rabid rightwingers. At their conference, the Lib Dems tried hard to differentiate themselves from the Conservatives, with figures like Chris Huhne, Vince Cable and Tim Farron all attacking them as unreconstructed Thatcherites. The Conservatives could have retaliated, but that would have made them look like the “Tea Party” extremists that Huhne referred to in his speech. Instead the Conservatives have presented themselves as model coalition partners, with cabinet ministers often praising their Lib Dem colleagues. 7. Ed Miliband’s attack on the “something for nothing” culture has struck a chord. Miliband was not the first politician to address the issue of a “something for nothing” culture, but he put it at the top of his agenda in his speech last week. But the Conservatives have grabbed it as a theme too, because they think voters believe that they – not Labour – are the party to address this. Miliband’s call for firms that do not offer apprenticeships to be banned from getting government contracts has also been picked up here. Yesterday Tory aides said that when Cameron attacks “vested interests” in his speech, he will be referring partly to firms that don’t offer apprenticeships. 8. But the Conservatives are not afraid of Labour under Ed Miliband. The Conservatives don’t seem to think that Labour can win an election under Miliband. I’ve yet to hear anyone talk about him as a serious threat. 9. Scotland seems to be slipping away from England – and Cameron doesn’t know how to stop that. Cameron talks strongly about his support for the union. But Conservative support in Scotland is very weak and one of the candidates in the leadership election there wants to disband the party and replace it with a new one. The union seems to be getting looser, and Cameron doesn’t seem to know what to do about it. 10. Party conferences aren’t really events for ordinary members any more. This is probably true of all the main parties, but it is particularly true here. These are great events MPs, journalists, lobbyists and people aspiring to be party candidates. But it hard to see their value for ordinary party members and many of the sessions in the main conference hall have been extraordinarily flat. The party conference format is ripe for reinvention. 10.54am: According to the BBC’s Andrew Neil, David Cameron is re-writing his speech to address the credit card problem. (See 9.36am.) Neil has posted this on Twitter. Major last minute rewriting Cameron speech. Concern re line to pay off credit cards. Would = recession He’s raising gov debt by 50% #cpc11 10.49am: Is it a good idea for everyone to pay off their credit card debt? Not particularly, as Polly Curtis explains on her Reality Check blog , with a full reference to the “paradox of thrift”. 10.27am: William Hague , the foreign secretary, is speaking later this morning but he has already given a round of interviews to the broadcasters. PoliticsHome were monitoring them all. Here are the main points. • Hague played down the suggestion that David Cameron was telling everyone to pay off their credit card debt. It is common sense that people should pay off debts when and where they can. [Cameron's] main point is that governments have to lead the way in doing that and that of course is what we are doing. • Hague claimed that Kenneth Clarke and Theresa May were in agreement on the need to change the way human rights legislation is interpreted. I think it would be a mistake for asylum seekers to go out and buy cats – they may not find that every case is the same. They are very much on the same page of course. They are completely agreed about this policy, in changing how we interpret Article Eight of the European Convention on Human Rights. Hague also claimed that the fact the newspapers had been preoccupied with a story about a cat showed that the conference had been a success. “I think the fact that there have been headlines about this individual cat actually shows what a successful conference we have had here,” he said. “If that is the worst that has happened this week, then things have gone pretty well on the whole.” (Actually, that misses the point. It wasn’t a story about a cat. It was a story about the Human Rights Act.) • He played down the prospect of trying to change Britain’s relationship with the EU in the near future. I believe that the EU has too much power and it is no secret that the Conservative Party wants some of those powers returning to the UK. That is not currently the position of our whole Coalition Government, and that opportunity is not there at the moment because major treaty change is not at the moment on the table. • He said he would advise any teenager not to give a speech at a party conference. This came when he was asked about Rory Weal, the 16-year-old who got a standing ovation when he spoke at Labour’s conference. Hague said people kept reminding him of the speech he gave to the Conservative conference as a teenager. People come up to me, teenagers come up to me, and they say ‘can I have some advice on giving a speech?’, and I say ‘don’t do it’, because they’ll still be playing the clip when you’re foreign secretary 30 years later. It’s probably best just to keep quiet. • He said the days of “automatic” growth were over. “I think the days of automatic growth have gone,” he declared. 9.51am: More bad news on the economy front – the economy grew even more slowly in the second quarter of 2011 than previously thought, it has emerged this morning. Here’s the Press Association report. The UK economy grew at a slower rate between April and June than previously thought, official figures revealed today, as the country’s recovery nearly ground to a halt. Gross domestic product (GDP) – a broad measure for the total economy – grew 0.1% in the second quarter, downwardly revised from previous estimates of 0.2%, the Office for National Statistics said. The near-stagnant growth was driven by a 0.8% drop in consumer spending, the biggest drop in more than two years, and a 1.2% decline in the production industries, the ONS said. Elsewhere, the ONS revealed growth in the first quarter of 2011 was revised down to 0.4% from 0.5% and the recession in 2008/09 was much deeper than previously thought but ended a quarter earlier than first estimated. The revisions come following an annual rebalancing of accounts known as the Blue Book exercise, which involves changes to methodology. The troubling data is released amid mounting fears over the health of the world economy, driven by the eurozone debt crisis, sluggish growth in the US and weak industry data in the UK and Europe. 9.36am: Political parties almost always give extracts from the leader’s conference speech to the media in advance, so that the journalists have something to report before the event happens. But the spin doctors don’t always get the headlines they want. This morning the newspapers have focused on what Cameron is going to say about paying off credit card bills. But, after his press team briefed the newspapers yesterday, they appear to have got nervous about that suggestion that he was telling everyone exactly how to manage their household finances and, when the broadcasters were briefed, this passage was left out. For the record, here’s the full extract from the speech about debt released in advance. But we need to tell the truth about the overall economic situation. People understand that when the economy goes into recession times get tough. But normally after a while, things pick up. Strong growth returns, people get back into work. This time, it’s not like that. And people want to know why the good times are so long coming. The answer is straightforward, but uncomfortable. This was no normal recession; we’re in a debt crisis. It was caused by too much borrowing, by individuals, businesses, banks- and most of all governments. When you’re in a debt crisis, some of the normal things that governments can do, to deal with a normal recession like borrowing to cut taxes or increase spending, these things won’t work because they lead to more debt, which would make the crisis worse. Why? Because it risks higher interest rates, less confidence and the threat of even higher taxes in future. The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That means households – all of us – paying off the credit card and store card bills. It means banks getting their books in order. And it means governments – all over the world- cutting spending and living within their means. This coalition government, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg and I – we’ve led the way here in Britain. Our new plan is right. And our plan will work. I know you can’t see it or feel it yet. But think of it like this. The new economy we’re building: it’s like building a house. The most important part is the part you can’t see – the foundations that make it stable. Slowly, but surely, we’re laying the foundations for a better future. But this is the crucial point: it will only work if we stick with it. 9.13am: In 1997, when Tony Blair became prime minister, Labour campaigned under the slogan: “Things can only get better”. Today David Cameron is going to wrap up the 2011 party conference season with his speech to the Conservatives and his message seems to be: “Things might get better, but not for a while, and they could get worse too.” Aides insist that the overall message will be optimistic but, as Patrick Wintour and Nicholas Watt report in the Guardian today , his mood will be measured and he will say that the economy is not going to be fixed quickly. Cameron will speak this afternoon. But there are also two sessions this morning. Here’s a full agenda. 10am: Session on the Conservative Policy Forum and the voluntary party, with contributions from Lady Warsi , the party co-chairman, Jeremy Middleton, chairman of the National Convention, Fiona Middleton, president of the National Convention and Oliver Letwin , the Cabinet Office minister, 11.15am: Session on foreign affairs, with contributions from Martin Callanan, the leader of the Conservatives in the European parliament, and Jan Zahradil, chairman of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group, Liam Fox , the defence secretary, and William Hague , the foreign secretary. 2.30pm: David Cameron’s speech . This morning I’ll put up a post on “10 things I’ve learnt from the Conservative conference. I’ll also be looking at the papers and bringing you the best comment from the web. I’ll post a summary at around 1pm, and another after Cameron finishes. Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference David Cameron William Hague Andrew Sparrow guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Conservative party conference 2011: live coverage

• Liam Fox’s speech – summary • William Hague’s speech – summary • Lunchtime summary 3.21pm: Cameron explains his growth plan. Dealing with our debts is line one, clause one of our plan for growth. But it is just the start. We need jobs – and we won’t get jobs by growing government, we need to grow our businesses. So here’s our growth plan: doing everything we can to help businesses start, grow, thrive, succeed. Where that means backing off, cutting regulation – back off, cut regulation. Where that means intervention, investment – intervene, invest. Whatever it takes to help our businesses take on the world – we’ll do it. The global economy has transformed in recent years. It used to take companies decades to become global giants: now it can take a couple of years. When you step off the plane in Delhi or Shanghai or Lagos, you can feel the energy, the hunger, the drive to succeed. We need that here. He complains about negative thinking – or “can’t do sogginess”, as he calls it. Frankly, there’s too much ‘can’t do’ sogginess around. We need to be a sharp, focused, can-do country. But as we go for growth, the last thing I want is to pump the old economy back up, with a banking sector out of control, manufacturing squeezed, and prosperity confined to a few parts of the country and a select few industries. Our plan is to build something new and to build something better. We can do it. 3.19pm: Cameron turns to the NHS. The NHS is the most precious institution in our country – to my family, to your family. At the last election, it was Labour policy to cut the NHS. It was Liberal Democrat policy to cut the NHS. It was our policy – Conservative policy – to protect the NHS and spend more on it this year, next year and the year after that because we are the party of the NHS, and as long as I’m here we always will be. And he has a message for the unions planning to go on strike over public sector pensions. You have every right to protest. But our population is ageing. Our public sector pensions system is unaffordable. The only way to give public sector workers a decent, sustainable pensions system, and do right by the taxpayer, is to ask public servants to work a little longer and contribute a little more. That is fair. What is not fair, what is not right, is going on strikes that will hurt the very people who help pay for your pensions. 3.17pm: Cameron says that he has insisted on cutting the deficit in a way that is fair. You can’t cut a deficit the size of ours without everyone making a sacrifice. But those with the most money are bearing the biggest burden. We’ve imposed a permanent levy on the banks, getting them to pay more every year than Labour did in one year. We’ve raised taxes on people who make their money overseas but live here. At the same time we’ve given real help to the poorest and most vulnerable. We’re taking over a million of the lowest-paid people out of tax altogether. And after the scandal of the 75p pension rise under Labour, we’re linking pensions to earnings so elderly people will be £10,000 better off in their retirement. Yes, this is a one-nation deficit reduction plan – from a one-nation party. That’s interesting – a very explicit commitment to one nation Conservatism. 3.16pm: Cameron turns to Labour. Of course, our deficit reduction programme is just one big bail-out of the last Labour government. This past year we’ve been subjected to a sort of national apology tour by Labour. Sorry for sucking up to Qadhafi. For not regulating the banks properly. For crushing civil liberties. For failing to go green. For not building enough homes. For the infighting that made them the most dysfunctional government ever. But you know what? Nothing – not a peep – on the thing they really need to say sorry for. Wasting billions and billions of your money. No apology for that. And now he turns to the man he dubbed the most annoying politician in Britain. You know what the Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls claimed last week? That Labour didn’t spend more money than they had “available”. Hello? Ed – you spent £428 billion more than you had “available”. There is only one conclusion you can rationally draw. We must never let these Labour politicians anywhere near our economy again. 3.15pm: Cameron says that while he is prime minister, Britain will never join the euro. And he sets out his approach to EU bail outs. But when it comes to any Euro bail-out mechanism, my approach is simple: Labour got us into it and I’ve made sure we’re getting out of it. 3.12pm: Cameron is now talking about the economy. He lists some measures the government is taking to help. But he says this recovery will not be like a normal economic recovery. The answer is straightforward, but uncomfortable. This was no normal recession; we’re in a debt crisis. It was caused by too much borrowing, by individuals, businesses, banks, and most of all, governments. When you’re in a debt crisis, some of the normal things that government can do, to deal with a normal recession, like borrowing to cut taxes or increase spending – these things won’t work because they lead to more debt, which would make the crisis worse. Why? Because it risks higher interest rates, less confidence and the threat of even higher taxes in future. The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That’s why households are paying down their credit card and store card bills. It means banks getting their books in order. And it means governments – all over the world – cutting spending and living within their means. That’s the rewritten passage. Cameron says he and Nick Clegg have led the way towards recovery. Our plan is right. And our plan will work. I know you can’t see it or feel it yet. But think of it like this. The new economy we’re building: it’s like building a house. The most important part is the part you can’t see – the foundations that make it stable. Slowly, but surely, we’re laying the foundations for a better future. But this is the crucial point: it will only work if we stick with it. 3.09pm: Cameron is in a patriotic vein. Some say that to succeed in this world, we need to become more like India, or China, or Brazil. I say: we need to become more like us. The real us. Hard-working, pioneering, independent, creative, adaptable, optimistic, can-do. That’s the spirit that has made this United Kingdom what it is: a small country that does great things; one of the most incredible success stories in the history of the world. He mentions communities heroes, like Dan Thompson, who lead a clean up operation after the riots. Leadership works, Cameron says. I know how tough things are. I don’t for one minute underestimate how worried people feel, whether about making ends meet, or the state of the world economy. But the truth is, right now we need to be energised, not paralysed by gloom and fear. Half the world is booming – let’s go and sell to them. So many of our communities are thriving – let’s make the rest like them. There’s so much that’s great about our country. We don’t have to accept that success in this century automatically belongs to someone else. We just have to remember the origin of our achievements: the people of Britain, taking a lead. That’s why so much of my leadership is about unleashing your leadership. Giving everyone who wants to seize it the opportunity, the support and above all the freedom to get things done. Giving everyone who wants to believe it the confidence that working hard and taking responsibility will be rewarded not punished. 3.06pm: Cameron is now on leadership, which is one of the big themes of the speech. Leadership in fighting poverty. Leadership in fighting tyranny. But when it came to that decision to help the Libyan people, there was something dispiriting about the debate here at home. It wasn’t that some people thought we shouldn’t do what we did – of course it’s everyone’s right to disagree. It was that too many thought Britain actually couldn’t do something like that any more. And you hear that kind of pessimism about our economic future, our social problems, our political system. That our best days are behind us. That we’re on a path of certain decline. Well I’m here to tell you that it isn’t true. Of course, if we sit around and hope for the best, the rest will leave us behind. If we fool ourselves that we can grow our economy, mend our society, give our children the future we want them to have. If we fool ourselves that we can do these things without effort, without correcting past mistakes, without confronting vested interests and failed ideas, then no, we’re not going to get anywhere. But if we put in the effort, correct those mistakes, confront those vested interests and take on the failed ideas of the past, then I know we can turn this ship around. Nobody wants false optimism. And I will never pretend there are short cuts to success. But success will come: with the right ideas, the right approach, the right leadership. Leadership from government: to set out the direction we must take, and the choices we must make. But leadership also from you. Because the things that will really deliver success are not politicians or government. It’s the people of Britain, and the spirit of Britain. 3.05pm: Cameron turns to Libya. This is a party – ours is a country – that never walks on by. Earlier this year some people said to me: “Libya’s not our concern”, “don’t start what you can’t finish”, and even – “Arabs don’t do democracy.” But if we had stood aside this spring, people in Benghazi would have been massacred. And don’t let anyone say this wasn’t in our national interest. Remember what Qadhafi did. He’s the man who gave Semtex to the IRA, who was behind the shooting of a police officer in a London square, who was responsible for the bombing of a plane in the skies over Lockerbie. Let’s be proud of the part we played in giving the Libyan people the chance to take back their country. In Afghanistan today, there are men and women fighting for Britain as bravely as any in our history. They come from across our country: England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland. They now have the equipment they need. And we’re on target to bring them home by the end of 2014. Theirs has been a campaign of incredible courage and sacrifice, and I know everyone in this hall will want to send a message to everyone who serves and who have served. Those in uniform in our armed forces and in our police. And those not in uniform, keeping us safe from terrorism on our streets. He defends Britain’s aid spending, which is unpopular with activists. It is the “right thing to do”, he says. That it’s a mark of our country, and our people, that we never turn our backs on the world’s poorest, and everyone in Britain can be incredibly proud of it. 3.02pm: Cameron is now making jokes about the books that members of the cabinet could record. As their social action project, Conservatives have been recording books for the blind this week. This passage is not in the text released to journalists. Here are Cameron’s suggetions. Geoge Osborne – The Man who Would be King. Boris Johnson – The Joy of …. Cycling. Kenneth Clarke – Crime and Punishment. 2.59pm: Cameron says the people have “very clear instructions” for this government. “Lead us out of this economic mess.” “Do it in a way that’s fair and right.” “And as you do it, make sure you build something worthwhile for us and our children.” (This reminds me of the rhetorical device he used in his speech announcing changes to the health bill: You told us to do X, we did it.) Cameron goes on: Clear instructions. Clear objectives. And from me: a clear understanding that in these difficult times, it is leadership we need. To get our economy moving. To get our society working, and in a year – the Olympics year – when the world will be watching us, to show everyone what Great Britain really means. And he thanks the activists for their record in elections. But first I want to say something to you in this hall. Thank you. Despite the predictions we won elections all over the country this May, so let’s hear it for those great campaigns you fought and the great results you achieved. And thank you for something else. In the AV referendum, you did Britain a service and kicked that useless voting system off the political agenda for decades to come. And next year let’s make sure we back Boris, beat Ken and keep London Conservative. You’re not just winners – you’re doers. 2.58pm: Cameron starts by commending his party for their discipline. This week, in Manchester, this party has shown the discipline, the unity, and the purpose that is the mark of a party of government. I’m proud of my team, I’m proud of our members, I’m proud to lead this party – but most of all, I’m proud of you. 2.57pm: At last the warm up is over. He’s on. 2.57pm: And now they are showing footage of Cameron visiting Tripoli. 2.56pm: Now they’re showing footage of Cameron visiting Egypt and addressing British troops in Afghanistan. 2.55pm: The video covers the AV campaign, the Conservative project in Rwanda and PMQs. They show Cameron’s “I’d rather be the child of Thatcher than the son of Brown” clip. 2.54pm: Another video presentation. It won’t be long now before Cameron starts. 2.53pm: My colleague Paul Owen is tweeting the events from within the hall. 2.47pm: Shaun Bailey, a Conservative candidate at the last election and one of David Cameron’s Big Society ambassadors, is speaking now. He is introducing two young people who are talking about the National Citizens Service, the volunteering scheme that Cameron wants to roll out nationwide. 2.35pm: Mary Ann Sieghart has just posted this on Twitter. Never seen a conference hall with empty seats for a Tory leader’s speech before. Whole empty rows today #cpc11 2.31pm: The afternoon session is starting. They are showing the party political broadcast that the Conservatives are using to urge people to give money to east African famine relief. 2.25pm: David Cameron is walking into the conference hall now. 2.18pm: The hall in Manchester is filling up. David Cameron is due to speak in about 20 minutes. 1.38pm: Here’s a lunchtime summary. • David Cameron hastily rewritten his conference speech to remove any suggestion that he is either urging or instructing the public to pay off their credit card bills . (See 12.37pm and 1.16pm.) • William Hague, the foreign secretary, has criticised Russia and China for vetoing an anti-Syria resolution at the UN. “The decision of Russia and China to veto this resolution, and to side with the brutal regime rather than with the people of Syria is deeply mistaken and regrettable,” Hague said. (See 12.56pm.) • Hague has said that the Conservatives will try to repatriate powers from the EU to Britain when “the right moment” comes. When we said that no more areas of power should go to the EU we were right. And now thanks to the European Union Act 2011, by law that cannot happen without a referendum. And we are just as right that the EU has more power in our national life than it should, and I believe as strongly as I ever have that when the right moment comes this party should set out to reduce it. • Liam Fox, the defence secretary, has warned that any attempt to further EU defence integration could undermine Nato . (See 11.49am.) • The Office for National Statistics has halved its estimate for growth in the second quarter of 2011 . It is now saying the economy only grew by 0.1% from April to June. • Primal Scream have attacked Theresa May for playing one of their songs at the end of her speech yesterday. As the Press Association, May chose the Glasgow outfit’s 1994 hit Rocks – featuring explicit lyrics about drug taking and prostitution – to play at the end of her speech. The band said it was not only an inappropriate theme but an insult to their own politics to have been associated with the party, branding it a “sick association”. It said: “Primal Scream are totally disgusted that the Home Secretary Theresa May ended her speech at the Tory party conference with our song Rocks. How inappropriate. Didn’t they research the political history of our band? Hasn’t she listened to the words? Does she even know what getting your rocks off means? No. She is a Tory; how could she?” 1.16pm: The Conservatives are now in full damage limitation mode. Ministers are taking to the airwaves to play down the consequences of the credit card gaffe. Yesterday aides said that Cameron would include this passage in his speech. The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That means households – all of us – paying off the credit card and store card bills. That was interpreted as Cameron telling people they should pay off their debts There are three reason why this was damaging. 1. People don’t like politicians lecturing them about their household finances. They don’t mind politicians moralising on subjects like bankers, but telling ordinary people what to do with their money is almost always a mistake. 2. It reminded voters that someone like Cameron – a well-paid professional with family wealth – finds it much easier to pay off his credit card debt than most ordinary people. 3. It doesn’t make economic sense. As Polly Curtis explains on her Reality Check blog, if want the economy to grow, you need people to spend money. Now the speech has been rewritten to make it clear that Cameron is not telling people what to do about their debt (see 12.37pm) and ministers are giving interviews saying this was never his intention. Andrew Mitchell, the international development secretary, told the BBC that people should “manage their own budgets in their own way”. And David Willetts, the universities minister, told the World at One that it was not unusual for speeches to change. I’ve been involved in this process in the party and the fact is drafts circulate, drafts get altered. I used to do some speech writing for Margaret Thatcher and I tell you, you went through draft after draft. 12.56pm: Here are the main points from William Hague ‘s speech to the conference. • Hague attacked Russia and China for vetoing a UN security council resolution on Syria. We and our European allies tabled a resolution in the UN Security Council calling on the Assad regime to stop the violence in Syria, after months of utterly unacceptable killings, torture and abuses. The decision of Russia and China to veto this resolution, and to side with the brutal regime rather than with the people of Syria is deeply mistaken and regrettable. • He said that the coalition had abandoned the “sofa government” adopted by Labour. We have created a National Security Council which brings together the key ministers, the Chief of the Defence Staff, the heads of the intelligence agencies and on Libya alone has already met almost sixty times. We work together every day, we consult the experts, our decisions are formally and properly made. Sofa government is out and cabinet government is back. • He claimed he was reviving British foreign policy. We are opening six embassies and closing none. We are expanding our diplomatic presence in 22 countries. And we are breathing new life into old neglected alliances such as with Australia, New Zealand and Japan and working to reinvigorate that great institution the Commonwealth … It is the job of our diplomats to be immersed in the culture and history of other nations, not ensnared in management-speak. If we have these skills as a nation when we want to negotiate a Treaty it will be done correctly; when we want a Trade deal it will be won; when we intervene overseas we will do so successfully; and so we will ensure that in twenty years time Britain’s Foreign office will remain the best diplomatic service in the world. We have brought new energy to British diplomacy, with Foreign Office ministers visiting 97 countries since the general election, and I have visited nearly 40 countries myself. I have been the first Foreign Secretary to visit Australia since Douglas Hurd, the first ever to visit a united Yemen, the first to make bilateral visits to Tunisia and New Zealand in thirty years. • He described his approach to foreign policy as “liberal conservatism”. Our party’s view of foreign policy is guided by our liberal conservatism: our sense of optimism and unquenchable faith in human nature, coupled with respect for the history and culture of other nations. • He said time was “running out” for a two-state solution in the Middle East. “We urge the Israelis and Palestinians to return to negotiations,” he said. 12.37pm: David Cameron has rewritten his speech to make it clear that he is not telling the public how to arrange their personal finances. An aide is in the press room now saying that the words released yesterday have been “misinterpreted” and that Cameron wanted to make the point that people are already paying off their debts. This is what Cameron was going to say. (See 9.36am for the passage in full.) The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That means households – all of us – paying off the credit card and store card bills. It means banks getting their books in order. And this is what he is going to say now. That’s why households are paying down their credit card and store card bills. It was a cock-up, they admit. “Hands up,” one aide said. According to the OBR figures flagged up by Labour (see 11.36am), household debt is going up. But the Tories say those figures include mortgage debt. In other respects, people are paying off their debts, they say. They are going to dig out some figures for us to prove it. 12.29pm: My colleague Damian Carrington, the Guardian’s head of environment, has read my “10 things I’ve learnt from the Conservative party conference” post (see 11.12am) and told me that I’ve missed something out. The Conservatives now see the environment as a vote loser, not vote winner. How else to interpret George Osborne’s “carbon clanger”, when he appeared to reverse five years of Tory commitment to the UK being a leader in the global low carbon economy. Perhaps Cameron’s speech will enlighten us? 12.26pm: William Hague, the foreign secretary, is speaking in the conference hall now. He has just told members that “sofa government” is out. But, a colleague points out, “back of the sofa government” appears to be in – because, metaphorically, that is where George Osborne has found the money for all this week’s announcements. 12.24pm: According to the BBC’s Nick Robinson, David Cameron has rewritten the passage in his speech about credit card debt. “Sloppy drafting” is being blamed for the fact that he gave the impression that he appeared to be lecturing us on clearing our credit card debt. 12.16pm: After Liam Fox delivered his speech, the Tories showed a video message from Aung San Suu Kyi , the Burmese opposition leader. She recorded a message for the Labour conference saying that the Burmese appreciated the value of events like party conferences because they did not have any democracy of their own. It seemed like a tacit endorsement of Labour. But she said almost exactly the same thing in her message to the Tories. 11.49am: Liam Fox , the defence secretary, has finished his speech now. Here are the main points. • Fox dismissed the notion that the European Union should play a greater role in defence. There are those in Europe who are calling for the EU to take a greater role in Europe’s security. Let me tell you, Europe already has a guarantor of its defence—it’s called NATO. It is nonsense to duplicate and divert from NATO at a time when resources are scarce across Europe. And the last thing we need is more EU bureaucracy. • He attacked EU countries that do not fulfill their commitments to NATO. He did not name them, but that seemed to be a reference to Germany. You know, many of those calling for deeper EU defence integration are already failing to fulfil their commitments to NATO. My message to them is clear, you cannot expect to have the insurance policy but ask others to pay the premiums. NATO must maintain its primacy in European defence because NATO is the alliance that keeps the United States in Europe. This not a luxury, it is a necessity. • He said the Ministry of Defence cuts could not stop Britain being an important military power. “Even after the MoD’s contribution to deficit reduction we still have the fourth largest defence budget in the world and we will continue to be one of only five countries (out of 28) in NATO meeting our 2% GDP obligation,” he said. • He said that he had taken a grip on MoD procurement. For years there was no real-time control on major equipment programmes to stop spiralling costs and constant delays. There is now. The Major Projects Review Board monitors the progress of the top 20 equipment programmes. And let me tell you, those programmes and those companies that are not delivering are being named and shamed. • He said Britain was on course to withdraw combat troops from Afghanistan by 2015. The Afghan National Security Forces are growing in both size and, more importantly, capability—and are in many cases leading operations against the insurgency. And it’s because of the progress made by the Afghan security forces, and the improvement in the security situation, that 500 British troops will be brought home by the end of 2012. And no British troops will be in a combat role, or in the numbers they currently are, by 2015. • He said he wanted to increase the size of the Territorial Army by 50%. • He said the the government had set up a £30m community covenant scheme to fund local project connecting communities to the armed forces. Some 31 applications have already been made, he said. 11.36am: More on the credit card debt row. Labour have pointed out that the Office for Budget Responsibility expects household debt to go up, not down, between now and 2015. Here’s an extract from a report the OBR issued in April. Our March forecast shows household debt rising from £1.6 trillion in 2011 to £2.1 trillion in 2015, or from 160 per cent of disposable income to 175 per cent. Essentially, this reflects our expectation that household consumption and investment will rise more quickly than household disposable income over this period. We forecast that income growth will be constrained by a relatively weak wage response to higher-than-expected inflation. But we expect household to seek to protect their standard of living, relative to their earlier expectations, so that growth in household spending is not as weak as growth in household income. This requires households to borrow throughout the forecast period. 11.34am: In the conference hall Fox is telling Tories that next year will be the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War. The government will continue to guarantee the security of the Falklands, he says. This gives him the opportunity to praise Margaret Thatcher. 11.29am: Outside the conference hall, Labour have now pounced on David Cameron’s comments about credit card debt. Ian Austin, a shadow minister, has put out this statement. I think most people will look at what David Cameron is saying today and just think he’s completely out of touch. Of course people have got to be careful, but he’s got to understand that lots of ordinary families are really struggling at the moment with prices, VAT and unemployment going up, and they can’t afford to pay off their credit cards all in one go. 11.24am: Liam Fox, the defence secretary, is speaking in the conference hall now. He says he wants to increase the size of the Territorial Army by 50%. 11.12am: On the Today programme this morning the Daily Mail’s Iain Martin said that he thought this had been the most boring party conference since 1834. I wouldn’t go that far, but it’s probably fair to say that this is not one for the history books. Still, you shouldn’t spend four days at a conference without coming away with some conclusions. Here are the “10 things I’ve learnt from the Conservative conference”. 1. The economic crisis is overwhelming all government thinking – and ministers are not entirely in control. After the riots there were predictions that the party conference season would be dominated by debates about social breakdown, and what should be done to counter it. That debate never really materialised. The Tories have been talking about social issues this week (although not, to any great extent, the Big Society), but there is only one subject that really seems to matter. Outwardly there’s no panic, but there is a recognition that, to an extent, the government is at the mercy of outside events. When George Osborne declared on Monday that nothing would boost the British economy as much as a resolution of the eurozone crisis, he was admitting that Britain’s fate partly depends on Angela Merkel. 2. There won’t be a plan B. Senior Labour figures think the government will abandon its deficit reduction programme because growth is so anemic. But after this week it’s harder than ever to imagine that happening. It would be a “Black Wednesday” moment for the government, destroying its economic credibility in an instant. 3. David Cameron has a problem with women voters – but he doesn’t know what do to about it. As Allegra Stratton explains in her column today, polling shows that the government has a particular problem with women. Cameron tried to address this earlier this week with a bout of apologising, but, by focusing on his laddish remarks at PMQs, he missed the point. “It’s the economy, stupid.” Women are being hit by the cuts. Ministers understand the problem, but nothing came out of the conference that suggests they have found a proper way of addressing it. 4. Cameron has contained the Eurosceptics – but Europe is going to be a big election issue. Before the conference it was thought that the Eurosceptics would use it to aggressively demand a much tougher line on Europe. But the traditional Conservative conference Euro-row didn’t happen. That’s partly because the economy has overshadowed everything. (See 1.) But it is partly because Cameron has indicated that he would like to park this issue until the election, when the Conservatives will seek to use robust Euroscepticism as an electoral asset. 5. Cameron remains his party’s biggest asset. The conference slogan is: “Leadership for a Better Future.” The jury is still out on the “better future”, but Cameron is certainly providing leadership. Polling suggests that he is the only main party leader who actually attracts floating voters to his party and here at the conference support for him is very, very strong. 6. The Conservatives are doing their best not to let the Lib Dems depict them as rabid rightwingers. At their conference, the Lib Dems tried hard to differentiate themselves from the Conservatives, with figures like Chris Huhne, Vince Cable and Tim Farron all attacking them as unreconstructed Thatcherites. The Conservatives could have retaliated, but that would have made them look like the “Tea Party” extremists that Huhne referred to in his speech. Instead the Conservatives have presented themselves as model coalition partners, with cabinet ministers often praising their Lib Dem colleagues. 7. Ed Miliband’s attack on the “something for nothing” culture has struck a chord. Miliband was not the first politician to address the issue of a “something for nothing” culture, but he put it at the top of his agenda in his speech last week. But the Conservatives have grabbed it as a theme too, because they think voters believe that they – not Labour – are the party to address this. Miliband’s call for firms that do not offer apprenticeships to be banned from getting government contracts has also been picked up here. Yesterday Tory aides said that when Cameron attacks “vested interests” in his speech, he will be referring partly to firms that don’t offer apprenticeships. 8. But the Conservatives are not afraid of Labour under Ed Miliband. The Conservatives don’t seem to think that Labour can win an election under Miliband. I’ve yet to hear anyone talk about him as a serious threat. 9. Scotland seems to be slipping away from England – and Cameron doesn’t know how to stop that. Cameron talks strongly about his support for the union. But Conservative support in Scotland is very weak and one of the candidates in the leadership election there wants to disband the party and replace it with a new one. The union seems to be getting looser, and Cameron doesn’t seem to know what to do about it. 10. Party conferences aren’t really events for ordinary members any more. This is probably true of all the main parties, but it is particularly true here. These are great events MPs, journalists, lobbyists and people aspiring to be party candidates. But it hard to see their value for ordinary party members and many of the sessions in the main conference hall have been extraordinarily flat. The party conference format is ripe for reinvention. 10.54am: According to the BBC’s Andrew Neil, David Cameron is re-writing his speech to address the credit card problem. (See 9.36am.) Neil has posted this on Twitter. Major last minute rewriting Cameron speech. Concern re line to pay off credit cards. Would = recession He’s raising gov debt by 50% #cpc11 10.49am: Is it a good idea for everyone to pay off their credit card debt? Not particularly, as Polly Curtis explains on her Reality Check blog , with a full reference to the “paradox of thrift”. 10.27am: William Hague , the foreign secretary, is speaking later this morning but he has already given a round of interviews to the broadcasters. PoliticsHome were monitoring them all. Here are the main points. • Hague played down the suggestion that David Cameron was telling everyone to pay off their credit card debt. It is common sense that people should pay off debts when and where they can. [Cameron's] main point is that governments have to lead the way in doing that and that of course is what we are doing. • Hague claimed that Kenneth Clarke and Theresa May were in agreement on the need to change the way human rights legislation is interpreted. I think it would be a mistake for asylum seekers to go out and buy cats – they may not find that every case is the same. They are very much on the same page of course. They are completely agreed about this policy, in changing how we interpret Article Eight of the European Convention on Human Rights. Hague also claimed that the fact the newspapers had been preoccupied with a story about a cat showed that the conference had been a success. “I think the fact that there have been headlines about this individual cat actually shows what a successful conference we have had here,” he said. “If that is the worst that has happened this week, then things have gone pretty well on the whole.” (Actually, that misses the point. It wasn’t a story about a cat. It was a story about the Human Rights Act.) • He played down the prospect of trying to change Britain’s relationship with the EU in the near future. I believe that the EU has too much power and it is no secret that the Conservative Party wants some of those powers returning to the UK. That is not currently the position of our whole Coalition Government, and that opportunity is not there at the moment because major treaty change is not at the moment on the table. • He said he would advise any teenager not to give a speech at a party conference. This came when he was asked about Rory Weal, the 16-year-old who got a standing ovation when he spoke at Labour’s conference. Hague said people kept reminding him of the speech he gave to the Conservative conference as a teenager. People come up to me, teenagers come up to me, and they say ‘can I have some advice on giving a speech?’, and I say ‘don’t do it’, because they’ll still be playing the clip when you’re foreign secretary 30 years later. It’s probably best just to keep quiet. • He said the days of “automatic” growth were over. “I think the days of automatic growth have gone,” he declared. 9.51am: More bad news on the economy front – the economy grew even more slowly in the second quarter of 2011 than previously thought, it has emerged this morning. Here’s the Press Association report. The UK economy grew at a slower rate between April and June than previously thought, official figures revealed today, as the country’s recovery nearly ground to a halt. Gross domestic product (GDP) – a broad measure for the total economy – grew 0.1% in the second quarter, downwardly revised from previous estimates of 0.2%, the Office for National Statistics said. The near-stagnant growth was driven by a 0.8% drop in consumer spending, the biggest drop in more than two years, and a 1.2% decline in the production industries, the ONS said. Elsewhere, the ONS revealed growth in the first quarter of 2011 was revised down to 0.4% from 0.5% and the recession in 2008/09 was much deeper than previously thought but ended a quarter earlier than first estimated. The revisions come following an annual rebalancing of accounts known as the Blue Book exercise, which involves changes to methodology. The troubling data is released amid mounting fears over the health of the world economy, driven by the eurozone debt crisis, sluggish growth in the US and weak industry data in the UK and Europe. 9.36am: Political parties almost always give extracts from the leader’s conference speech to the media in advance, so that the journalists have something to report before the event happens. But the spin doctors don’t always get the headlines they want. This morning the newspapers have focused on what Cameron is going to say about paying off credit card bills. But, after his press team briefed the newspapers yesterday, they appear to have got nervous about that suggestion that he was telling everyone exactly how to manage their household finances and, when the broadcasters were briefed, this passage was left out. For the record, here’s the full extract from the speech about debt released in advance. But we need to tell the truth about the overall economic situation. People understand that when the economy goes into recession times get tough. But normally after a while, things pick up. Strong growth returns, people get back into work. This time, it’s not like that. And people want to know why the good times are so long coming. The answer is straightforward, but uncomfortable. This was no normal recession; we’re in a debt crisis. It was caused by too much borrowing, by individuals, businesses, banks- and most of all governments. When you’re in a debt crisis, some of the normal things that governments can do, to deal with a normal recession like borrowing to cut taxes or increase spending, these things won’t work because they lead to more debt, which would make the crisis worse. Why? Because it risks higher interest rates, less confidence and the threat of even higher taxes in future. The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That means households – all of us – paying off the credit card and store card bills. It means banks getting their books in order. And it means governments – all over the world- cutting spending and living within their means. This coalition government, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg and I – we’ve led the way here in Britain. Our new plan is right. And our plan will work. I know you can’t see it or feel it yet. But think of it like this. The new economy we’re building: it’s like building a house. The most important part is the part you can’t see – the foundations that make it stable. Slowly, but surely, we’re laying the foundations for a better future. But this is the crucial point: it will only work if we stick with it. 9.13am: In 1997, when Tony Blair became prime minister, Labour campaigned under the slogan: “Things can only get better”. Today David Cameron is going to wrap up the 2011 party conference season with his speech to the Conservatives and his message seems to be: “Things might get better, but not for a while, and they could get worse too.” Aides insist that the overall message will be optimistic but, as Patrick Wintour and Nicholas Watt report in the Guardian today , his mood will be measured and he will say that the economy is not going to be fixed quickly. Cameron will speak this afternoon. But there are also two sessions this morning. Here’s a full agenda. 10am: Session on the Conservative Policy Forum and the voluntary party, with contributions from Lady Warsi , the party co-chairman, Jeremy Middleton, chairman of the National Convention, Fiona Middleton, president of the National Convention and Oliver Letwin , the Cabinet Office minister, 11.15am: Session on foreign affairs, with contributions from Martin Callanan, the leader of the Conservatives in the European parliament, and Jan Zahradil, chairman of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group, Liam Fox , the defence secretary, and William Hague , the foreign secretary. 2.30pm: David Cameron’s speech . This morning I’ll put up a post on “10 things I’ve learnt from the Conservative conference. I’ll also be looking at the papers and bringing you the best comment from the web. I’ll post a summary at around 1pm, and another after Cameron finishes. Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference David Cameron William Hague Andrew Sparrow guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Phone hacking: News International faces more than 60 claims

Sara Payne, 7/7 hero Paul Dadge and father of Josie Russell, who survived murder attempt, among 13 new writs this week News International is now facing more than 60 separate writs over phone hacking, with a raft of new claimants emerging including Sarah’s law campaigner Sara Payne, 7/7 hero Paul Dadge and Shaun Russell, father of Josie, the girl who survived a murder attempt. Thirteen new legal claims were issued against Rupert Murdoch’s company on Monday, which followed 24 the week before. One of the most recent claimants is Sara Payne, the woman who campaigned with the News of the World to change the law so that parents could obtain access to information about paedophiles following the murder of her eight-year-old daughter, Sarah. Another writ was in the name of Paul Dadge, the man whose image was published across the world after he was photographed helping victims of the 7/7 tube bombings. There were also writs from singer Dannii Minogue, Paul Burrell, Princess Diana’s former butler, and Shaun Russell, whose daughter Josie survived a hammer attack in which her mother and sister were killed in 1996. According to people familiar with the situation, the sudden flurry of writs occurred because of a judicial cut-off point for initial claims. It is thought the rash of suits has been triggered by a deadline set by Mr Justice Vos to consider claims ahead of a January trial of a few test cases to determine how much News International should pay in damages to five of the victims. Among the high-profile names in the 63 writs are the former Downing Street communications chief Alastair Campbell and politicians, including John Prescott, Simon Hughes, Denis MacShane, Chris Bryant, Mark Oaten, Tessa Jowell and George Galloway. There are several actors in the list, such as Jude Law and Sadie Frost, and TV personalities including Steve Coogan and Ulrika Jonsson. There are also writs in the names of George Best’s son, Calum, footballer Ashley Cole, rugby player Gavin Henson and jockey Kieren Fallon. Some of the writs involve more than one person. For example, Charlotte Church is joined in her lawsuit by her mother, Maria, and stepfather James. The overwhelming majority of the writs have been issued jointly against News Group Newspapers, the News International subsidiary that published the now defunct News of the World, and Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator who worked under contract for the Sunday tabloid. However, one – by singer Cornelia Crisan – also names the former News of the World chief reporter, Neville Thurlbeck, and another of the paper’s former reporters as defendants in her claim. It is the first phone-hacking lawsuit to target Thurlbeck. He was arrested and bailed in April for alleged phone hacking but has not been charged. He is suing News International for unfair dismissal. Thurlbeck said: “As I said last week, the truth will out. But this will be in the law courts and at a public tribunal.” The number and range of the claims has taken some legal observers by surprise. One source said it suggests that News International’s £20m contingency fund to deal with legal claims will not be anywhere near enough to cover the final total. One of the lawyers acting for some of the hacking victims, Mark Lewis, told Bloomberg News : “So far, fewer than 5% of the victims of Glenn Mulcaire have been notified. “He was just one agent used by one paper. When the final tally takes place, we will see thousands of claims and more than one paper.” Lewis said that, as the number of claimants grows, estimates that Murdoch’s company would need at least £100m to settle such claims looks like “a serious underestimate”. His logic is based on the fact that only 200 people have been identified from the 4,000 names said to be on documents that were seized from Mulcaire’s house in 2006, when he was arrested with the News of the World’s former royal editor Clive Goodman. Both Mulcaire and Goodman were jailed for phone hacking in early 2007. About half of those initially identified have launched legal actions. So, if the same proportion of the full 4,000 were to sue, then News International’s liability, in terms of damages plus legal costs would be colossal. News International has already offered to pay one of Lewis’s clients, the family of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler, £3m. Media lawyer Niri Shan, of Taylor Wessing, said that victims who file claims before next year’s trial could benefit because “there is a level of uncertainty about what the court will award” in January. He added: “[News International parent company] News Corp may overpay to get rid of claimants.” Phone hacking News of the World Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Roy Greenslade guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …