Head of global news at BBC says Iranian officials are targeting around 10 of channel’s staff with campaign of intimidation Iran has arrested, questioned and intimidated relatives of journalists working for the London-based BBC Persian Television in its latest crackdown on press freedom. It comes just two weeks after the arrests in Tehran of documentary film-makers accused of secretly working inside the country for the Farsi-language service. Peter Horrocks, the head of global news at the BBC, said on Wednesday that relatives and friends of around 10 of the channel’s Iranian staff who work in the UK have been approached by the authorities. He called on the Iranian government to “repudiate the actions of its officials” and urged the British government to “deter the Iranian government” from attempts to undermine free media. “Passports have been confiscated, homes searched and threats made. The relatives have been told to tell the BBC staff to stop appearing on air, to return to Iran, or to secretly provide information on the BBC to the Iranian authorities,” he wrote on the BBC blog The Editors. “Many of our Iranian employees who live in London are fearful to return to their country because of the regime’s attacks on the BBC. But although those journalists are beyond the direct reach of their government they are now subject to a new underhand tactic,” he added. Horrocks also highlighted the plight of the imprisoned film-makers who Iran said have “painted a black picture of Iran and Iranians” by supplying the BBC with reports misrepresenting the country. They have been identified as four documentary film-makers – Hadi Afarideh, Naser Saffarian, Mohsen Shahrnazdar and Mojtaba Mirtahmasb – and a producer and distributor, Katayoun Shahabi. The BBC says they are independent and have no links with the television channel. It has previously shown films belonging to some of them after buying rights but it insists they have never been commissioned by the channel. Since the arrests, several Iranian officials have stepped forward to condemn the film-makers as “a group of terrorists, Baha’is, communists” and, in the words of Iran’s minister of intelligence, Heydar Moslehi, “devil-worshippers”. BBC Persian, which has also been accused by the Iranian regime of collecting information on behalf of MI6, is blocked in the country but millions of Iranians watch satellite channels illegally. Observers have seen the recent developments as Iran’s response to the broadcast of a documentary made by BBC Persian on the Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, called The Ways of the Ayatollah. The programme – produced by Iranian journalist Bozorgmehr Sharafedin and shown in mid-September – was the first of its kind to touch the taboo issue of Khamenei’s leadership. Iranian documentary film-maker Maziar Bahari, who was arrested in June 2009 and kept in jail for 118 days, said dozens of other people in Iran have also been summoned to Iran’s security departments in recent weeks after the broadcast of the documentary. “They basically want to cut any contact of the Iranians with the outside world,” he said. “They are afraid of the BBC in particular because its journalists worked in Iran until recently and have a better understanding of the Iranian society.” Bahari, who has written a book about his experience in jail named Then They Came For Me, said: “I know the imprisoned film-makers and I believe Iran has absolutely no evidence against them but is now resorting to fabricating charges in order to implicate them or make them to confess.” Bahari – whose forced confession was broadcast by Iran’s state-run Press TV while in jail – said the broadcast of the Khamenei documentary by the BBC triggered the arrests. Kamnoosh Shahabi, the sister of the imprisoned distributor, said Katayoun Shahabi had been denied access to her lawyer since her arrest: “The authorities asked us not to speak to media but we are extremely worried and we have no other choice.” She said the irony is that her sister has been praised by the Islamic republic in the past for her contribution to Iran’s film industry. Iran’s embassy in London could not be reached for comment. BBC Iran Middle East Television industry Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The father of Josie Russell, who survived a hammer attack in which her mother and sister were killed, is one of the claimants The father of Josie Russell, who as a young girl survived a horrific attack in which her mother and sister were killed, is among a raft of new claimants suing News International for alleged phone hacking. Shaun Russell is one of dozens of alleged victims who are suing the News of the World’s parent company, part of Rupert Murdoch’s media empire. Russell’s daughter Josie survived the 1996 attack by Michael Stone in which her mother, Lin, and younger sister, Megan, were murdered. The murders and the subsequent hunt for the killer were the subject of intense media interest. Thirteen new legal writs, from claimants including the Sarah’s law campaigner Sara Payne and 7/7 hero Paul Dadge, were issued against News Group Newspapers company on Monday , taking the number of civil actions now under way to more than 60. Dadge is the man whose image was published across the world after he was photographed helping victims of the 2005 tube bombings. Another 24 writs were filed last week. The scale of the litigation now facing the News of the World’s owner could force the company to make payments that far exceed the £20m it has set aside for compensating phone-hacking victims who can demonstrate that they have a strong case. It emerged in July that a mobile phone given to Sara Payne had been targeted by Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator who was employed by the paper. Payne campaigned with the NoW to change the law so that parents could obtain access to information about paedophiles following the murder of her eight-year-old daughter, Sarah. Payne’s representatives indicated at the time that she was unlikely to sue the title. She wrote an article praising the paper in its final issue, which was published the week before it emerged she had also been targeted by Mulcaire. Others who have also now begun legal action include Dannii Minogue and her brother Brendan, Princess Diana’s former butler Paul Burrell, James Blunt, Pete Doherty, the actor Sadie Frost, and Lance Gerrard-Wright, the ex-husband of Ulrika Jonsson, who is also suing the paper. The rash of lawsuits has been triggered by a deadline set by Mr Justice Vos, the judge who is hearing a number of phone-hacking cases that are well advanced. They include actions being brought by Steve Coogan and the football agent Sky Andrew, which are due to come to trial in the new year. The media lawyer Niri Shan, of Taylor Wessing, said victims who filed claims before a trial scheduled for January could benefit because there was “a level of uncertainty about what the court would award in January. He added: “News Corp may overpay to get rid of claimants.” If the claimants win in January and they are awarded damages by Vos those payouts will be used to assess the level of future payments to hacking victims. Also among the high-profile names in the 63 writs now listed are the former Downing Street communications chief Alastair Campbell and politicians including Lord Prescott, Simon Hughes, Denis MacShane, Chris Bryant, Mark Oaten, Tessa Jowell and George Galloway. There are also writs in the names of George Best’s son, Calum, Ashley Cole, the rugby player Gavin Henson and the jockey Kieren Fallon. Some of the writs involve more than one person. Charlotte Church is joined in her lawsuit by her mother, Maria, and stepfather James. This reflects the fact that Mulcaire typically made a note of phone numbers and other personal information belonging to the relatives and friends of the celebrities he allegedly targeted. The overwhelming majority of the writs have been issued jointly against News Group Newspapers, the News International subsidiary that published the now defunct News of the World, and Mulcaire. But one, filed by the singer Cornelia Crisa, also names the former NoW chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck, who chose to break his silence on the phone-hacking affair last week in sensational fashion. It is the first phone-hacking lawsuit to target Thurlbeck, who was arrested and bailed in April for alleged hacking but has not been charged. Thurlbeck said: “As I said last week, the truth will out. But this will be in the law courts and at a public tribunal.” He has started legal proceedings against News Group claiming that he was unfairly dismissed. The number and range of the claims has taken some legal observers by surprise. One of the lawyers acting for some of the hacking victims, Mark Lewis, pointed out: “So far, fewer than 5% of the victims of Glenn Mulcaire have been notified.” Scotland Yard detectives working on Operation Weeting, which is investigating allegations of widespread phone hacking at the News of the World, are in the process of contacting nearly 4,000 people whose names are listed in notebooks seized from Mulcaire’s home in a 2006 raid. Mulcaire and Clive Goodman, the News of the World’s former royal editor, were jailed for hacking in January 2007. Lewis said: “When the final tally takes place, we will see thousands of claims and more than one paper.” He added that, as the number of claimants grows, estimates that Murdoch’s company would need at least £100m to settle such claims looks like “a serious underestimate”. Several litigants, including the former Sky Sports commentator Andy Gray and the actor Sienna Miller, have already received payments of tens of thousands of pounds from News Group. The typical payment is likely to be around £50,000, but some will far exceed that. For example, the company has already offered to pay one of Lewis’s clients – the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler’s family – £3m. Phone hacking Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers News International Roy Greenslade James Robinson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …UN failure to pass sanctions resolution against Assad’s regime has convinced some that diplomacy cannot protect them An armed insurrection inside Syria looks set to gather momentum after the failure to pass a UN resolution against president Bashar al-Assad’s regime, according to dissidents in two key Syrian cities. Activists from Homs and Hama, where mostly peaceful protests over the past six months have lately become more aggressive and armed, say the failure of the US effort to threaten sanctions against Syria has convinced some that diplomacy cannot protect them. “There’s no way out of this except to fight,” said an activist from Homs. “For the people of Homs the international community are not with us and we know that for sure. Russia and China will continue to protect Assad and as long as that happens, he will hunt us down.” Britain, France and the US are expected to seek a fresh resolution on Syria before the UN Security Council after Russia and China on Tuesday night vetoed a draft that threatened sanctions, a security council source said. The veto by Russia, supported by China, provoked the biggest verbal explosion from the US at the UN for years, with its ambassador Susan Rice expressing “outrage” over the Moscow and Beijing move. Rice also walked out of the security council, the first such demonstration in recent years. While walk-outs are common at the UN general assembly, they are rare in the security council. “It will not go away,” the source said. “It will not be next week. We don’t have a date. But there are a number of ways the security council can get back to this.” The vote was 9-2 in favour, with four abstentions: South Africa, India, Brazil and Lebanon. Rice, who before joining the Obama administration established a reputation as an outspoken critic of the failure of the west to intervene in humanitarian crises round the world, said after the vote: “The United States is outraged that this council has utterly failed to address an urgent moral challenge and a growing threat to regional peace and security.” Without naming Russia and China but making it clear they were the target of her words, she said: “Let there be no doubt: this is not about military intervention. This is not about Libya. That is a cheap ruse by those who would rather sell arms to the Syrian regime than stand with the Syrian people.” She added: “This is about whether this council, during a time of sweeping change in the Middle East, will stand with peaceful protestors crying out for freedom – or with a regime of thugs with guns that tramples human dignity and human rights. “We deeply regret that some members of the council have prevented us from taking a principled stand against the Syrian regime’s brutal oppression of its people.” The resolution had been weakened considerably since the original text was circulated to the 15 security council members in early August seeking to impose sanctions. The draft resolution on Tuesday only said the security council would “consider its options” in 30 days’ time if Assad failed to stop the violence and seek a peaceful settlement of the crisis. It said the options would include sanctions. To further water down the resolution in an attempt to make it more acceptable to Russia and China, there was no hint of military intervention. In Homs, where government forces are routinely clashing with armed members of the opposition – many of them former soldiers who defected with their weapons – outgunned protesters are now openly seeking weapons from outside the country. “We know that we will not see Nato jets above the skies of Damascus,” said one Homs resident. “It is us against them. No one else will help us.” In Beirut, where aid supplies to Homs and Hama are co-ordinated, aid workers said they had been receiving more requests for weapons than for food or medicine. “Of course we can’t help with this. But it shows how much their priorities have changed.” Syria Bashar Al-Assad Middle East United Nations Martin Chulov Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rep. Louis Slaughter (D-NY) told Current TV’s Keith Olbermann Tuesday that a “retroactive recusal” of Justice Clarence Thomas could result in overturning the Citizens United case. Earlier this year, the liberal group Common Cause argued that both Justices Thomas and Antonin Scalia should have recused themselves from the Citizens United case because they attended events organized billionaire Charles Koch. In addition, Thomas’ wife, Virginia Thomas, may have received financial benefit from the Citizens United ruling, something that was never disclosed by the justice. Twenty House Democrats Thursday called on the U.S. Judicial Conference to formally request that the U.S. Department of Justice investigate Justice Clarence Thomas’s non-compliance with the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. Justice Thomas indicated on his annual financial disclosure forms that his wife had received no income since he joined the bench in 1991, despite the fact that his wife had in fact earned nearly $700,000 from the Heritage Foundation from 2003 to 2007. “What I’m very interested here is the votes that he has cast that may be in conflict,” Slaughter explained to Olbermann. “Of course, his wife can work. But the fact is there are only nine justice on that Supreme Court and it certainly should be a given that a family member of any of those people lucky enough to be a Supreme Court justice should not in any way involve themselves in matters that will go before that court. Now, we all know that she worked very hard for the Citizens United case, which I think is one of the most egregious things that have ever happened in the United States Supreme Court.” She added: “There is such a thing as a retroactive recusal. We’re looking into that. That case, if you remember, was decided 5-4. If we could take away his vote, we could wipe that out. It would lose. How ’bout that?” “That’s only the future of the democracy there, isn’t it?” Olbermann asked. “Yes, indeed. And we are — you know, the judiciary is the last place for all of us to go. We’re only as good — all of us — as the courts are, only as safe as the courts are good. Their interpretations are really what give us the freedoms when you come down to it. They have enormous power.”
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rep. Louis Slaughter (D-NY) told Current TV’s Keith Olbermann Tuesday that a “retroactive recusal” of Justice Clarence Thomas could result in overturning the Citizens United case. Earlier this year, the liberal group Common Cause argued that both Justices Thomas and Antonin Scalia should have recused themselves from the Citizens United case because they attended events organized billionaire Charles Koch. In addition, Thomas’ wife, Virginia Thomas, may have received financial benefit from the Citizens United ruling, something that was never disclosed by the justice. Twenty House Democrats Thursday called on the U.S. Judicial Conference to formally request that the U.S. Department of Justice investigate Justice Clarence Thomas’s non-compliance with the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. Justice Thomas indicated on his annual financial disclosure forms that his wife had received no income since he joined the bench in 1991, despite the fact that his wife had in fact earned nearly $700,000 from the Heritage Foundation from 2003 to 2007. “What I’m very interested here is the votes that he has cast that may be in conflict,” Slaughter explained to Olbermann. “Of course, his wife can work. But the fact is there are only nine justice on that Supreme Court and it certainly should be a given that a family member of any of those people lucky enough to be a Supreme Court justice should not in any way involve themselves in matters that will go before that court. Now, we all know that she worked very hard for the Citizens United case, which I think is one of the most egregious things that have ever happened in the United States Supreme Court.” She added: “There is such a thing as a retroactive recusal. We’re looking into that. That case, if you remember, was decided 5-4. If we could take away his vote, we could wipe that out. It would lose. How ’bout that?” “That’s only the future of the democracy there, isn’t it?” Olbermann asked. “Yes, indeed. And we are — you know, the judiciary is the last place for all of us to go. We’re only as good — all of us — as the courts are, only as safe as the courts are good. Their interpretations are really what give us the freedoms when you come down to it. They have enormous power.”
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: Ocala.com Here’s how Florida’s prisons were nearly privatized without anyone knowing about it. In a rather arrogant and high-handed move, Republican lawmakers tucked a secret provision into the budget right at the end of the frenzied 2011 legislative session requiring private companies to take over 29 prisons by January 1st. Of course, it was all intended to union-bust and replace nearly 3800 union employees with minimum-wage private company replacements. Tallahassee.com : Turner and Johnson said Sen. JD Alexander, a Lake Wales Republican and budget chairman, placed the privatization language in the budget after the prisons portion had cleared earlier committees that would have opposed the move. Assistant Attorney General Jon Glogau argued that legislators have wide authority to tell departments how to use appropriated funds. He said the Legislature didn’t have to pass a stand-alone statute to privatize prisons because the state has had a law for 20 years allowing the DOC to outsource some prison operations. How many, and where those prisons will be, is up to the Legislature, Glogau said. He said every budget item embodies some form of policy choice and that House and Senate appropriations committees and subcommittees held many public hearings on all phases of the budget, including the final product. “Slippery-slope arguments are hyperbole, at best,” Glogau said. He said agencies have executive authority to organize, operate and staff their offices most efficiently. “Privatization of prisons is a unilateral right of the employer,” said Glogau. “I don’t want to make light of the fact that people are losing their jobs but, under the facts and the case law, it is the unilateral right of the public employer to do this.” That sneaky Senator. After the prison portions cleared committees who might have noticed, much less have agreed to it, he slipped it in there. Despite all the false bravado, there seems to be at least a small concern that it might not be one hundred percent on the level, since the good Governor Scott pressured former Florida Corrections overseer Ed Buss not to testify or give a deposition before the case was heard. Fortunately the unions were paying attention, and took it to court. Last Friday, Judge Jackie Fulford ruled the scheme unconstitutional. There is a cynical, criminal aspect to this whole scheme, in much the same way that Governor Walker rammed through his “reforms” in Wisconsin. TampaBay.com : Leon County Circuit Judge Jackie Fulford found that a plan to privatize 29 state prisons in South Florida is unconstitutional because lawmakers wrote the change into the state budget instead of passing separate legislation. Governors from both political parties and legislatures controlled by either Republicans and Democrats similarly have been overruled by the courts over the past 40 years for using the state budget to slip in significant changes to state law. That often happens when those policy changes can’t stand up to public scrutiny or don’t have enough support among rank-and-file lawmakers to be approved on their own merits. In this case, Scott and influential legislators such as Senate budget chief J.D. Alexander of Lake Wales were determined to pursue one of the nation’s largest privatization efforts no matter what. In the Senate, Alexander quietly stuck language into the budget to privatize prisons — to the surprise of the chairman of the committee that oversees criminal justice spending, Sen. Mike Fasano of New Port Richey. And Scott fired his Department of Corrections secretary after he questioned the wisdom of the privatization effort and supported the lawsuit filed by the union that represents state prison guards. It’s probably just a coincidence that the Boca Raton company expected to win the new prison contract, GEO Group, had 16 lobbyists in Tallahassee, donated $25,000 to Scott’s inaugural celebration and once employed Scott’s key outside budget adviser. Yeah, sure that’s coincidence. Just like it’s coincidence that CCA (Corrections Corporation of America) donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Republican Governors’ Association in 2010 so they could land the fat privatization contracts in those governors’ states. Not that it should surprise anyone, but this is standard operating procedure for these insane Republican governors. If you can’t win by legal and straightforward means, just go ahead and slip it in there where no one will notice. And if they happen to notice anyway, just stare them down and claim you’re perfectly right about screwing state employees. And if that doesn’t work, pray for a friendly judge. Rick Scott drew the short straw this time, so I expect his next move will be stacking the Florida court system with judges of his choice. What a good ole boy he is. Oh, and such good news for Florida! Tricky Ricky plans to run again in 2014 !!!!
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: Ocala.com Here’s how Florida’s prisons were nearly privatized without anyone knowing about it. In a rather arrogant and high-handed move, Republican lawmakers tucked a secret provision into the budget right at the end of the frenzied 2011 legislative session requiring private companies to take over 29 prisons by January 1st. Of course, it was all intended to union-bust and replace nearly 3800 union employees with minimum-wage private company replacements. Tallahassee.com : Turner and Johnson said Sen. JD Alexander, a Lake Wales Republican and budget chairman, placed the privatization language in the budget after the prisons portion had cleared earlier committees that would have opposed the move. Assistant Attorney General Jon Glogau argued that legislators have wide authority to tell departments how to use appropriated funds. He said the Legislature didn’t have to pass a stand-alone statute to privatize prisons because the state has had a law for 20 years allowing the DOC to outsource some prison operations. How many, and where those prisons will be, is up to the Legislature, Glogau said. He said every budget item embodies some form of policy choice and that House and Senate appropriations committees and subcommittees held many public hearings on all phases of the budget, including the final product. “Slippery-slope arguments are hyperbole, at best,” Glogau said. He said agencies have executive authority to organize, operate and staff their offices most efficiently. “Privatization of prisons is a unilateral right of the employer,” said Glogau. “I don’t want to make light of the fact that people are losing their jobs but, under the facts and the case law, it is the unilateral right of the public employer to do this.” That sneaky Senator. After the prison portions cleared committees who might have noticed, much less have agreed to it, he slipped it in there. Despite all the false bravado, there seems to be at least a small concern that it might not be one hundred percent on the level, since the good Governor Scott pressured former Florida Corrections overseer Ed Buss not to testify or give a deposition before the case was heard. Fortunately the unions were paying attention, and took it to court. Last Friday, Judge Jackie Fulford ruled the scheme unconstitutional. There is a cynical, criminal aspect to this whole scheme, in much the same way that Governor Walker rammed through his “reforms” in Wisconsin. TampaBay.com : Leon County Circuit Judge Jackie Fulford found that a plan to privatize 29 state prisons in South Florida is unconstitutional because lawmakers wrote the change into the state budget instead of passing separate legislation. Governors from both political parties and legislatures controlled by either Republicans and Democrats similarly have been overruled by the courts over the past 40 years for using the state budget to slip in significant changes to state law. That often happens when those policy changes can’t stand up to public scrutiny or don’t have enough support among rank-and-file lawmakers to be approved on their own merits. In this case, Scott and influential legislators such as Senate budget chief J.D. Alexander of Lake Wales were determined to pursue one of the nation’s largest privatization efforts no matter what. In the Senate, Alexander quietly stuck language into the budget to privatize prisons — to the surprise of the chairman of the committee that oversees criminal justice spending, Sen. Mike Fasano of New Port Richey. And Scott fired his Department of Corrections secretary after he questioned the wisdom of the privatization effort and supported the lawsuit filed by the union that represents state prison guards. It’s probably just a coincidence that the Boca Raton company expected to win the new prison contract, GEO Group, had 16 lobbyists in Tallahassee, donated $25,000 to Scott’s inaugural celebration and once employed Scott’s key outside budget adviser. Yeah, sure that’s coincidence. Just like it’s coincidence that CCA (Corrections Corporation of America) donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Republican Governors’ Association in 2010 so they could land the fat privatization contracts in those governors’ states. Not that it should surprise anyone, but this is standard operating procedure for these insane Republican governors. If you can’t win by legal and straightforward means, just go ahead and slip it in there where no one will notice. And if they happen to notice anyway, just stare them down and claim you’re perfectly right about screwing state employees. And if that doesn’t work, pray for a friendly judge. Rick Scott drew the short straw this time, so I expect his next move will be stacking the Florida court system with judges of his choice. What a good ole boy he is. Oh, and such good news for Florida! Tricky Ricky plans to run again in 2014 !!!!
Continue reading …With their camouflage Bibles and combat crosses, the forces’ 278 chaplains are outsiders in the church and the military The Rev James Francis was travelling in an armoured vehicle north of the Bowri desert in Afghanistan, accompanying the Brigade Reconnaissance Force during the stopping and searching of vehicles for insurgents, when a Royal Marine interrupted his chat with a gunner to ask if it was right to kill. “That was a direct question,” says the padre for 30 Commando, “but it’s quite normal for these things to occur to people out here and it’s vital that when difficult decisions are being made we have direct answers, that as Christians we don’t retreat into some kind of holy huddle.” Francis is the archetypal Church of England priest – cheerful, polite, with James Herriot DVDs and a lavish tea collection – but his congregation is extraordinary: British forces who on Friday will have been engaged in operations in Afghanistan for 10 years in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. Chaplains – there are 278 serving in the British military – have also been in the country for a decade to minister and give comfort when the war exacts terrible costs. There have been 382 UK military fatalities in Afghanistan since 2002 – 35 of them this year. Camp Bastion and other British military bases in Afghanistan hold vigils, overseen by padres such as Francis, to commemorate those who have died. These have come to represent the most formal face of collective worship here, but much of the work of the chaplains is in smaller gatherings, perhaps over a cup of tea. The men and women are forced to deal with mortality at a far younger age than most of their civilian peers. “For when you need someone to pray with” is the motto for a dedicated military telephone prayer line. Combat crosses Wherever UK forces are, padres will be found. They have military and medical training but no weapons. The tools of their trade are camouflage-cover Bibles and they wear combat crosses – small, metallic discs with a punched-out cross – alongside the standard military-issue dogtags bearing their surname, blood type, service number and religion. While Francis’s digs are in Lashkar Gah, a military base so well-appointed it is nicknamed Lash Vegas, he and other chaplains regularly find themselves on the frontline in the war against the Taliban and al-Qaida on patrols and operations, and Francis’s foray into the Bowri desert was not untypical. So, back to the marine’s question. Is it right to kill? Sometimes, says Francis, force is necessary in situations to counter what would otherwise be worse. “Not to provide them with an element of spiritual direction and support would be seriously negligent. We have a role to serve those who are there to pull the trigger. We help them negotiate the moral maze,” he says. The padres are something of a tribe of outsiders – outsiders in the church (many of their peers just don’t understand how they can do the job they do), and outsiders among the military men and women they support. Against a backdrop of an increasingly secularised Britain, it might jar that troops still have chaplains, or that the Ministry of Defence employs them – at a cost of £22m a year – when it is slashing jobs elsewhere as part of its strategic defence spending review (the funding status of chaplains is “currently being assessed”, the MoD says). But clergy have served men and women in the forces for almost a century, with padres rising to prominence during the first world war, offering support not readily available at the frontline or from the chain of command. It was a first world war chaplain nicknamed Woodbine Willie – real name Geoffrey Anketell Studdert Kennedy – who had this tip for newcomers: “Take a box of fags in your haversack, and a great deal of love in your heart, and go up to them, laugh with them, joke with them; you can pray with them sometimes, but pray for them always.” The advice still holds true. Then, as now, many troops show little interest in religion. Petty Officer Hamish Burke, 28, says the only time religion enters his life is when he is in theatre – the area of military operations. He does not go to church. He is not baptised. None of his family goes to church and he only went to midnight mass at Buckfast Abbey because he wanted to go to the abbey. He married in a register office and says he doesn’t “even have the bare minimum religious affiliation”. While he feels “ill-placed” going to a church service, he feels differently about vigils. “Right at the start they talk about what that person left behind. While you think about that, you think what you have to lose yourself. My little boy is 14 months old. It’s a time to reflect on where you are and what people back home are going through.” Remembrance Hours before the Guardian arrived at Camp Bastion, thousands of troops had gathered to remember the life of 24-year-old Lieutenant Daniel John Clack, from 1st Battalion the Rifles, who was killed by an improvised explosive device on 12 August. The vigil for Clack was the 32nd to have taken place in 2011. The 33rd was being organised as the Guardian prepared to leave. Sergeant Barry Weston, from 42 Commando Royal Marines, died on 30 August. Commanders fully recognise and appreciate the work of the padres, even if their contribution is not always understood elsewhere. Major Nigel Jordan-Barber was a rifle company commander with 3 Scots (the Black Watch) in summer 2009, a particularly bloody period for British troops in Afghanistan. Several 3 Scots soldiers died during the battalion’s six-month tour of Musa Qala, Helmand province. Jordan-Barber says: “We were unable to participate in the remembrance services or repatriation because my company was so far away from the rest of 3 Scots. I asked the 3 Scots padre [Duncan Anderson], to prepare some words for me to say in remembrance, of Gus Millar in particular.” Millar, 40, from Inverness, was killed by a rocket-propelled grenade alongside Private Kevin Elliott, 24, while on foot patrol in the Babaji district. Jordan-Barber says: “Millar was very popular and his death came as a shock to most of my company. Being able to call on a padre who knew the deceased, and knew my soldiers, to advise me how to manage their grief, was of immense importance. “This is not mawkish sentimentality, but essential in my role as commander to make sure that they had the time and the resources to get their thoughts in order before they went back to their operational tasks.” There was another death at the end of the 2009 tour that Jordan-Barber remembers well. Acting Sergeant Michael Lockett of the Mercians was killed by a roadside bomb days before he was due to leave Afghanistan. Once again, the padre helped the men through the ordeal. “It was one of the most contradictory and moving events I have experienced,” says Jordan-Barber. “His coffin was paraded past the battlegroup on to the tailgate of the aircraft which was to fly him home. Padre Duncan said some quiet prayers before the aircraft taxied away. I discussed it with some of my soldiers afterwards and they were very clear that although it wasn’t a funeral we all felt we had taken part in a very spiritual event.” Jordan-Barber has had soldiers of varying denominations under him and says padres offer a “ministry of all souls” that is is respected by all. “I have been assisted in my role as a commander by a great number of padres conducting their ministry in arduous and extreme environments. Their presence alongside us as valuable as their role.” Geoff Withers, a Church of England priest ministering to the men and women of the Joint Aviation Group, reckons on spending 90% of his time with people who have no formal practice of religion. “We work hard to be able to walk into a hangar without emptying it. They are reasonably used to your presence.” The softly spoken 48-year-old priest, from Belfast, looks like any other member of the air force save for the discreet crosses on his uniform, and weaves his way in and out of smoking areas decorated with murals of busty women. Withers describes himself as “a nosy beggar” who is interested in human issues “first and foremost”. He adds: “If something difficult happens I’m not a complete stranger. I might be regarded as a weirdo but I’m not a stranger.” The “something difficult” is too often the death of a serviceman. Padres – who earn as much as bishops in the Church of England, starting on more than £37,000 – have their own moral mazes to navigate. Last month the government inquiry into the death of the Basra hotel receptionist Baha Mousa – who was beaten to death while in British custody in Iraq in 2003 – criticised Father Peter Madden, who was attached to 1st Battalion the Queen’s Lancashire Regiment, for not reporting the abuse. The inquiry accused Madden of giving inconsistent evidence and “lacking the courage” to report the “shocking and shameful” treatment of 10 Iraqi men, including Mousa. His conduct shocked serving chaplains. One, who does not wish to be named, says: “The inquiry was very damning. That padre got it wrong. I hope it was a one-off but it will be a marker for us.” Scott Shackleton, a chaplain to 45 Commando, is on his third tour of Afghanistan. His parish consists of Royal Marines who treat his chaplaincy – in an old British fort, now called Camp Shawqat – like a common room, helping themselves to tea, coffee and television and popping outside for cigarettes. Occasionally they will flick through the books on the table, including the camouflage-print Bibles or the Commando Prayer Book. The cover shows a cross above a black dagger – the badge every marine wears on his arm. Men and women, who are in good health, deal with mortality at a far earlier age than their friends back home. A sense of vulnerability among the men and women here sharpens the mind, raising questions that may not otherwise be asked. The consensus among padres is that troops are changed by their experiences, sometimes for the better. Alice Smith, a chaplain for the Joint Fires Group, says: “I’m not suggesting everyone will become an evangelical Christian but people start to ask questions and that’s a start. There’s no support for them back home on this because society does not encourage people to explore their faith in a meaningful way. Obviously any minister will tell you that they would love to have more people come to church. But it would be foolish to expect our guys to come to church.” The padres are aware of the practical and theological challenges they face when working with young, mostly “unchurched” men. “Jesus didn’t have a church,” says Shackleton, a Church of Scotland minister. “He hung around and walked among people. In some ways he spent his time with people who didn’t go to synagogue. But he didn’t say that not going didn’t matter either.” The marines address him as padre or Scott as he wears the same rank as the person he is speaking to. Like the men around him he has a green beret, having completed the commando course. Shackleton’s chaplaincy can be a chat over cup of tea, a formal service or a quiet word under camouflage netting. The topic of conversation is more likely to focus on relationship or family issues than moral guidance or spiritual reassurance. He can be seen in the same places as the commandos – the dining area, Camp Shawqat’s messes, the gym or the makeshift running track, which is basically a dusty path, used by marines of all ranks and ages at all hours. Shackleton can be seen doing laps of an afternoon, although he has yet to adopt the latest exercise devised by marines to stay fit – flipping a massive tyre along a 100-metre stretch or dragging it behind him on a harness. The doors to his accommodation – a windowless shipping container – are always open. The arrangement hasn’t always been this cosy. Shackleton flew into Afghanistan in January 2002, with 3 Commando Brigade as part of Operation Jacana. “It was war fighting. It was about dealing with men getting on to a helicopter, going out to fight. I was also dealing with them when I came back. There’s something straightforward about war fighting because you’re plunged into a survival position. Two sides are fighting, one is going to win and the other isn’t. But the fallout depends on how many casualties you have. We didn’t take any in Jacana.” But they lost 11 people in Iraq. “That’s when it changes. Ever since then that’s been the experience for people in Herricks [the name for the UK's military operations in Afghanistan]. You’re dealing with families who have lost someone and they have to go forward. “The walk up to the family’s front door is the shittiest thing in the world because you know you’re about to change someone’s life for the worst. If the guys have lived when their friend didn’t, they may feel responsible. You realise how fragile your life is. Maybe there’s redemption in that.” Chaplains The majority of the 278 military chaplains across the three services belong to the Church of England and there are civilian chaplains for each major faith group. A Ministry of Defence spokesman has said the spending of £22m a year on military chaplaincy is “currently being assessed”. Groups such as the British Humanist Association argue that religious groups should fund their own chaplains – whether they work in hospitals, prisons or universities – and that the job of providing pastoral support should not be confined to people of faith but open to all “qualified people”. According to figures released last year, the Royal Army Chaplains’ Department is experiencing one of its busiest decades since the second world war. It has deployed 15 padres to Afghanistan and the experience of chaplaincy has left a life-changing impression on some troops. Around 70 men and women from the armed forces are considering military chaplaincy as a result of their experiences with padres on the frontline. The starting salary for a military chaplain is £37,172 on appointment, rising to £55,857 after 15 years’ service. Senior chaplains are on a separate pay scale. The average salary for a Church of England bishop is £39,020. Military Anglicanism Afghanistan Christianity Religion Riazat Butt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Judge instructs would-be jury members not to discuss case online or do background research ahead of Vincent Tabak trial Potential jurors in the trial of Vincent Tabak, the man accused of murdering Joanna Yeates, have been told to avoid discussions about the case on social network sites. The 12 jurors who will hear the case against Tabak are due to be sworn in on Thursday. Before sending them home for the night on Wednesday, the trial judge, Mr Justice Field, told the possible jurors he had “stern instructions” for them. He told them: “It is most important you don’t read or take any notice of any publications concerning this case.” The judge said that meant they should not look at reports of the current proceedings at Bristol crown court or reports from when Yeates went missing. “Do not look at anything on social network sites or other social websites,” he added. Earlier the judge said Tabak, who denies murder, had to be tried only on the evidence that was put before the court. “If other information starts to leak in that pollutes the system of justice,” he said. On Tuesday he also impressed on the jurors that they should not do any background research of their own about the murder. Twelve jurors (out of a possible 17) are due to be sworn in on Thursday morning. The judge told them they would be “next required” after that on Monday. Tabak, a 33-year-old Dutch engineer, is accused of murdering landscape architect Yeates, 25, just before Christmas last year. Wearing spectacles, a dark suit, blue tie, shirt and sneakers, Tabak watched proceedings from the dock. Before being selected, the potential jurors had answered a series of questions to ensure they were not connected with people or businesses involved in the case. They were told that they would have to be available for the next four weeks. Yeates went missing after pre-Christmas drinks with friends near Bristol city centre. After a high-profile search, her frozen body was found on a country lane on Christmas morning three miles from her home in Clifton, Bristol. Tabak is being represented by William Clegg QC. Nigel Lickley QC prosecutes. The trial continues. Joanna Yeates Bristol Crime Steven Morris guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Man accused of seeking details of anti-aircraft missile system which experts say the Chinese are trying to copy Russia’s security service has revealed that it arrested a suspected Chinese spy who posed as a translator while seeking sensitive information on an anti-aircraft system. The man, identified as Tun Sheniyun, was arrested on 28 October last year, the federal security service (FSB) said in a statement cited by RIA-Novosti news agency. It was unclear why the FSB disclosed the arrest on Wednesday, less than one week before the prime minister, Vladimir Putin, travels to China on an official visit. The alleged spy was acting “under the guise of a translator of official delegations”, the statement said. He had “attempted to obtain technological and maintenance documents on the S-300 anti-aircraft missile system from Russian citizens for money”, it added. That information is a state secret, it said. Prosecutors sent the case to court on Tuesday, the statement said. Tun faces charges of attempted espionage. Last year, Russia delivered 15 S-300 systems to China, a popular Soviet-era arms export, as part of a deal signed several years earlier. Yet Beijing has recently turned to more modern systems. Putin’s two-day visit to China next Tuesday will be his first foreign trip since he announced his planned return to the Russian presidency next year. Ruslan Pukhov, director of the centre for analysis of strategies and technologies, a defence thinktank in Moscow, said: “They [the Chinese] are trying to copy this system illegally. They’ve already copied a whole series of our weapons. “They’re trying to clone the S-300, to serve their interests and also to export. As I understand it, it’s not all working out. They probably wanted extra documentation to better deal with this task of reverse engineering.” A report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri) released this week warned that the Sino-Russian relationship was growing increasingly uneasy given China’s international rise. “In the coming years, while relations will remain close at the diplomatic level, the two cornerstones of the partnership over the past two decades – military and energy co-operation – are crumbling,” the thinktank wrote. “As a result, Russia’s significance to China will continue to diminish.” It said that while more than 90% of China’s major conventional weapons imports came from Russia between 1991 and 2010, the volume of imports had declined dramatically in the last five years. In part, that reflected the development of its own arms industry and the fact that Russia could not meet some of the new demands of the People’s Liberation Army as it developed, said Dr Paul Holtom, director of the Sipri arms transfers programme and one of the report’s authors. But it also reflected Russia’s diversified customer base, which allowed it to take a tougher negotiating stance with China, particularly given anxiety about how China would use its purchases. “Russia is unwilling to provide China with advanced weapons and technology, primarily because it is concerned that China will copy Russian technology and compete with Russia on the international arms market,” said Holtom. “The nature of the arms transfer relationship will increasingly be characterised by competition rather than co-operation.” Maintenance and upgrades accounted for perhaps 10% of Russian arms transfers, meaning that Russians do not want to share related documents, he said. But China also has concerns that some of the technology it is buying is not always up to scratch. No one at the foreign ministry in Beijing could be reached for comment. Earlier this year, Ukrainian authorities jailed a Russian man for six years, claiming he was stealing military secrets to further China’s aircraft carrier programme. In the past two years, Russian customs officials have also accused two Chinese citizens of attempting to smuggle spare parts for Russian fighter jets across the border. Espionage Russia China Arms trade Vladimir Putin Europe Miriam Elder Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …