Richard Klein reassures digital channel’s fans but adds that it will inevitably feel effects of 20% cuts BBC needs to make The BBC4 controller, Richard Klein, has said his channel is “not going to be axed”, but confirmed its scope is likely to be reduced . Speaking at the MediaGuardian Edinburgh International Television Festival on Friday, Klein said that inevitably his digital channel would feel the effects of the 20% cuts the BBC is making across the board due to last year’s licence fee settlement freeze. “BBC4 will not be axed as far as I’m aware. Obviously it’s still under review. Will BBC4 face some consequences of the BBC-wide reduction in our funding of 20%? I’d imagine so. It’s inevitable,” he added. An online Save BBC4 petition, launched earlier this month after MediaGuardian.co.uk reported that the channel was facing cuts, has attracted more than 18,000 signatures in 10 days. Klein said the campaign to save BBC4 was “flattering” but reiterated: “The channel is not going to be axed. That’s not going to happen.” However, he added that it was “difficult to see the vast majority of savings coming from cutting budgets further” and said that viewers will notice a difference on screen. “People will see a difference, I’m sure. You can’t take 20% out of the BBC and not.” He said drama will continue on the channel but did not go into detail about its scope. BBC executives are considering reducing BBC4′s UK originated drama and comedy output, with the focus shifting to so-called “arts and archive” programming. Despite Bafta award-winning single dramas such as The Road to Coronation Street and biopic Enid, some corporation executives have questioned whether BBC2 should instead be airing such shows. BBC4 has also commissioned a smaller number of comedies, such as The Thick of It and Getting On, which have attracted critical acclaim. “One thing that will be true is that the channel as far as I’m concerned will stay true to its ideals of what we do as much as we can.” Klein said he did not think BBC4 should be annexed by BBC2 in the way that 6Music has been by Radio 2. He passionately defended the channel, saying “BBC4 is completely different”, adding, “I don’t think there’s any call at the moment to say that BBC2 and BBC4 fit that well”. Klein also eased fears about the future of original drama on BBC4 by announcing plans for an adaptation by Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais of Alan Furst’s The Spies Of Warsaw. The Spies of Warsaw spans the decade from 1933, against a backdrop of Nazi Germany expanded its power and influence across Europe and eventually provoking the outbreak of the second world war with its invasion of Poland. Klein also unveiled a new arts series called Art Nouveau , a new series later next year on the recession, plus Jo Brand will look at kissing for a new show and a season of programming about the British Army. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook BBC4 BBC Television industry MediaGuardian Edinburgh International Television Festival MediaGuardian Edinburgh International TV Festival 2011 Tara Conlan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Dick Cheney is once again telling everyone how much he loves waterboarding and torture. NBC is teasing an in-depth interview about Cheney’s new book, In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir , which is being released at the end of August. Other bits and pieces are coming out to help promote the sales of the book like this article in the NY Times today: Cheney Says He Urged Bush to Bomb Syria in ’07 During George Bush’s entire presidency the question of how much influence and authority VP Dick Cheney was given was always been part of the discussion. Cheney openly disdained rules, conventions and laws, pushing the concept of the Unitary Executive further than Nixon ever dreamed. Was Cheney making all the important policy decisions? Cheney once believed he was highly qualified to be president and threw out a trial balloon in 1996 . Defense Secretary Dick Cheney said Monday he would consider a presidential run in 1996, adding that he worried about U.S. military cuts planned by President-elect Clinton in the face of instability in Russia. The Red Scare, how predictable. However, he decided not to run after all . Fast forward to 2000, Cheney conveniently picked himself for the office after he was named to head the search team to find a Vice President for Bush’s ticket. And there was a lot of controversy about how that all went down . (h/t ThinkProgress ) The news in my book about this process is that Cheney never filled out his own questionnaire; that the heart surgeon who vouched for his health never met him or looked at his records; and that Bush and Cheney never interviewed anyone for the job until Cheney already had it nailed. But what I find most fascinating in the NY Times article is that Cheney actually reveals personal conversations he had with his president as well as many other top Bush aides and advisers. Plus he’s taking full credit for running the government response to the 9/11 attacks, which makes Bush look weaker than his My Pet Goat seven-minute stare. Cheney was asked by Jamie Gangel of ABC News if Bush would be upset by these reveals, but replied with a nonchalant “no”. But just think about what he is admitting to: as the 9/11 attacks were happening, Cheney has no problem revealing in his book that he was running the government response, completely against protocol. The book opens with an account of Mr. Cheney’s experiences during the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, when he essentially commanded the government’s response from a bunker beneath the White House while Mr. Bush — who was away from Washington and hampered by communications breakdowns — played a peripheral role. But Mr. Cheney wrote that he did not want to make any formal statement to the nation that day. “My past government experience,” he wrote, “had prepared me to manage the crisis during those first few hours on 9/11, but I knew that if I went out and spoke to the press, it would undermine the president, and that would be bad for him and for the country. “We were at war. Our commander in chief needed to be seen as in charge, strong, and resolute — as George W. Bush was.” Bush should have been in control that tragic day, not Cheney, since he was the elected president and was not incapacitated from doing his duties. The one question that should be asked of George Bush by the media is did he relinquish command and control to Cheney during those precious minutes and hours after the attacks? If yes, why? If the answer is no – also why? Because these words make it appear that Cheney was indeed much more powerful than Bush was. This was always the rumor and here it is in memoir form and corroborated by the 9/11 Commission Report. Remember this from the 9/11 Commission Report: Cheney Gave Order to Shoot Down Jets Vice President Dick Cheney was huddled with top U.S. officials in a bunker below the White House on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when a military aide told him that a hijacked aircraft was 80 miles from Washington and closing in fast. The aide needed to know: Did Cheney want to give warplanes scrambled over Washington orders to shoot it down? Cheney did not hesitate. He authorized fighter aircraft “to engage the inbound plane.” Perhaps in his haste to act — President Bush was in Florida at the time — Cheney might have shortcut White House protocol, the report said. The normal chain of command for military “engage” orders goes from the president to the Secretary of Defense, and not through the Vice President, it said. Although Cheney said he conferred with the president before giving the order, the commission staff could not confirm that a phone call took place in that time frame. Several minutes after giving the order, Cheney informed Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld that he had done so. “So we’ve got a couple of aircraft up there that have those instructions at the present time?” Rumsfeld asked. “That is correct,” Cheney replied. “And it’s my understanding they’ve already taken a couple of aircraft out.” That understanding turned out to be mistaken. By then, three hijacked airliners had already been crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The airliner Cheney ordered shot down had already been forced by passengers to crash in a Pennsylvania field. And another seemingly hostile aircraft turned out to be a Medevac helicopter, headed to the Pentagon. There was a lot of discussion between the secret service and Bush’s aides about where the President should be because he was vulnerable to looking politically weak for running out of town. PRESIDENT George Bush Sr came to the defense of his son yesterday amid growing criticism of the president’s decision not to return immediately to Washington after Tuesday’s attacks. That problem was solved because Cheney told Bush that there was a threat against Air Force One so he should stay out of DC which was reported by the WSJ in 2004 (pdf) . Once airborne, Mr. Bush spoke again on a secure phone with Mr. Cheney, who relayed a new message that changed the president’s mind, White House officials later said. The vice president urged Mr. Bush to postpone his return because, Mr. Cheney said, the government had received a specific threat that Air Force One itself had been targeted by terrorists. Mr. Cheney emphasized that the threat included a reference to what he called the secret code word for the presidential jet, “Angel,” Mr. Bartlett said in an interview. Although in the days after Sept. 11, Mr. Cheney and other administration officials recounted that a threat had been received against Air Force One, Mr. Bartlett said in a recent interview that there hadn’t been any actual threat. Word of a threat had resulted from confusion in the White House bunker, as multiple conversations went on simultaneously, he said. Many of these exchanges, he added, related to rumors that turned out to be false, such as reports of attacks on the president’s ranch in Texas and the State Department. As for the Air Force One code name, Mr. Bartlett said, “Somebody was using the word ‘angel,’ ” and “that got interpreted as a threat based on the word ‘angel.’ ” (Former Secret Service officials said the code wasn’t an official secret, but a radio shorthand designation that had been made public well before 2001.) The vice president’s office gave an account differing from Mr. Bartlett’s, saying it still couldn’t rule out that a threat to Air Force One actually had been made. Days after the attacks, Mr. Cheney had said word of the threat had been passed to him by Secret Service agents. But in interviews, two former senior Secret Service agents on duty that day denied that their agency played any role in receiving or passing on a threat to the presidential jet. An official in Mr. Cheney’s office said in an interview that Mr. Cheney had been mistaken in saying the threat came to him via the Secret Service. The official said that instead, Mr. Cheney had received word of the threat from “a uniformed military person” manning the underground bunker. The official said the vice president and his staff don’t know who the individual was. And the official said that he couldn’t say definitively whether or not a threat had been made. “I’m not in a position to know the answer to that question,” the official in the vice president’s office said. The Telegraph also reported practically the same news . The picture changed instantly. No more could the President be accused of sheltering in the safety of far-away Louisiana; now he was a hunted man – the main target. Within a week, though, Ari Fleischer, the White House press secretary, had all but admitted the story was completely untrue. Who cooked it up? Most fingers point at Mr Cheney. “It did two things for Dick,” says a well-informed Washington official. “It reinforced his argument that the President should stay out of town, and it gave George W an excellent reason for doing so.” It also gave Cheney some extra maneuvering room. What’s also bizarre, but in hindsight doesn’t come as a surprise is how Cheney’s wife , Lynne kept interfering with the activities as they were unfolding . But Army Major Mike Fenzel, who is also in the PEOC, complains to him, “I can’t hear the crisis conference [that Clarke has been leading] because Mrs. Cheney keeps turning down the volume on you so she can hear CNN… and the vice president keeps hanging up the open line to you.” Later on in the day Dick Cheney went against long standing protocol again and commandeered Camp David: After attending President Bush’s meeting with his principal advisers in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center beneath the White House, Vice President Dick Cheney heads back upstairs, accompanied by his wife Lynne Cheney and his two top aides, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby and David Addington. They all head out onto the White House’s South Lawn and get onto Marine Two, the vice president’s helicopter, being joined on it by a military aide, a communications expert, three Secret Service agents, and Cheney’s doctor. They take off, in violation of long-standing protocol, according to which only the president takes off from the South Lawn. Only a few of the most senior White House officials are informed of their destination. About 30 minutes later they arrive at Camp David, the presidential retreat in the Catoctin Mountains, about 70 miles from the White House. Again going against tradition, Cheney and his family settle into the cabin usually reserved for the president, Aspen Lodge. Liz Cheney, the vice president’s eldest daughter, and her young family, joins them there. This is the first of many nights that Cheney spends in “secure, undisclosed locations” in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks (see September 12, 2001-2002 ). [ Federation of American Scientists, 10/2/2000 ; Hayes, 2007, pp. 345-346 ] He will return to Washington the following morning for an 8 a.m. meeting at the White House (see September 12, 2001 ). I wonder how George Bush will feel after Cheney’s book is released because during an attack on US soil, Vice President Dick Cheney appointed himself the Decider in Chief on that crucial day in our history:
Continue reading …Documents released by National Archives show prime minister Winston Churchill feared the colony would turn communist Secret documents declassified on Friday by MI5 reveal in detail how in 1953 the UK under prime minister Winston Churchill overthrew the elected government of British Guiana – now Guyana – because he feared its leftwing leader and his American wife would lead the British colony into the arms of the Soviet Union. The documents reveal how British spies kept up intense scrutiny on Cheddi Jagan and his wife Janet, who together founded the People’s Progressive party (PPP) to campaign for workers’ rights and independence from British rule for the sugar-producing colony in northern South America. The UK had agreed a new constitution in the early 1950s which allowed British Guiana’s political parties to participate in national elections and form a government, but maintained power in the hands of the British-appointed governor. Christopher Andrew, MI5′s official historian, said the files provide new details of the coup and “further evidence that MI5 played a more important part in British decolonisation than is often realised”. The Jagans – a US-educated former dentist and his wife, born Janet Rosenberg in Chicago – seem an unlikely threat. But the 39 folders of files released by the National Archives are crammed full of tapped phone conversations, intercepted letters and accounts of physical surveillance over more than a decade. In 1951, the year after the Jagans founded their party, an MI5 agent based on the nearby island of Trinidad described them as “something new in British Guiana politics”. “Both are able and intelligent and the mere fact that Janet Jagan is white, young and not unattractive in appearance lends considerable interest to her activities and those of her husband,” he said. To British authorities, the Jagans were a headache. To the Americans, they were a potential communist threat on America’s doorstep. MI5 concluded that their party was “not receiving any financial support from any communist organisation outside the country”. Nonetheless, amid worsening strikes and unrest, Britain grew unhappy with the Jagans’ “disruptive antics”. After the party won a huge majority in British Guiana’s 1953 election, making Cheddi Jagan prime minister, Churchill decided to act. “We ought surely to get American support in doing all that we can to break the communist teeth in British Guiana,” he wrote to his colonial secretary. In the end, Britain acted alone, mounting a military operation codenamed Operation Windsor. Churchill dispatched a warship, HMS Superb, and brought hundreds of troops by air and sea to secure key sites. On 9 October, Britain suspended British Guiana’s constitution, fired its legislators and arrested the Jagans. The surprise military operation went according to plan. The Trinidad-based MI5 officer noted with quiet satisfaction that “it was obvious that the PPP leaders had no idea that the constitution would be suspended or that they might be arrested”. And the spy threw in a note of thanks for the women who helped the army to march on its stomach. “I might add in parenthesis that catering arrangements for the airborne troops during their halt in Trinidad were carried out by Mrs Beadon, wife of the commissioner of police, Mrs Rahr, my wife and Joyce Huggins … and I understand that no less than 600 large sandwiches were cut by these ladies,” he wrote. An outraged Cheddi Jagan appealed by telegram to Britain’s opposition Labour party for help. Leader Clement Attlee replied curtly: “Regret impossible to intervene.” For the next three years, British Guiana was ruled under emergency powers by the British governor and appointed officials, and the Jagans were kept under house arrest and strict surveillance. In the years that followed, MI5 softened somewhat toward Cheddi Jagan, acknowledging that he was an astute and popular politician – though the agent based in Trinidad strongly disliked Janet Jagan, whom he described as a committed communist “uncompromising in her hatreds”. By the 1960s, Britain’s spies worried that the Jagans would turn to newly communist Cuba, possibly making their country a base for Latin American revolutionaries. “If the Jagans remain in power after independence and if their activities and views remain unchanged, they will represent a threat to the stability both of British Guiana itself and of the neighbouring territories,” the officer wrote. Andrew said it was clear from previously released official documents that successive British governments “gave in to pressure from the White House to allow the CIA to use subterranean means to ensure that the first leader of independent Guyana in 1966 was not Cheddi Jagan”. He added in a podcast for the National Archives (begins 5m 38sec in): “In most British colonies, there was a relatively friendly transfer of power to independent governments. British Guiana was a notable exception.” The Jagans remained a major force in Guyanese politics and Cheddi Jagan became prime minister again in 1961, when the batch of MI5 files ends. After the cold war ended, Cheddi Jagan served as president of Guyana from 1992 until his death in 1997. His wife succeeded him between 1997 and 1999. She died in 2009, aged 88. Guyana Communism MI5 National Archives Winston Churchill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The latest stories from the front lines of the labor fight across the country… Frederick M. Hess and Randi Weingarten discuss when education “reforms” in pensions and union rights affect teachers and students. The National Labor Relations Board says that most private employers have to post signs that tell workers what their rights are in terms of the National Labor Relations Act. Special interests for big business owners freak out, calling it “a trap” and “a new low” for the NLRB. Central Michigan University faculty are picketing the college for refusing to bargain with the teachers union in good faith. Watch the live webcast of the National Symposium on Jobs, Justice and the American Dream Friday from the dedication of the new Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial dedication in Washington, D.C. Mitt Romney embraces “right to work” anti-union laws. Governors Rick Perry (TX) and John Kasich (OH) reject $731 million in aid for the jobless. Tom Morello of Rage Against the Machine, Wayne Kramer of the MC5 and Tim McIlrath of Rise Against are doing a series of shows in Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan in support of union rights and to benefit the Nation Institute. National Nurses United are calling for a “Main Street Contract for the Americna People that would protect working families and will have a “National Day of Action to Tax Wall Street” on September 1. Students are sitting in at the Hershey Chocolate factory in Palmyra, Pa., to expose the use of subcontracting that prevents workers from exercising their rights because they can’t determine who exactly they work for. There is a growing chorus of organizations fighting against discrimination against the unemployed in hiring practices. 1,300 Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers were locked out August 1 in three states after they rejected American Crystal Sugar Company’s final offer as not being a fair contract.
Continue reading …Indian MP from top political family joins government scramble to placate anti-corruption campaigner with reforms The scion of India’s most powerful political family has praised a reform activist for galvanising anger against corruption, but condemned his hunger strike as “a dangerous precedent for a democracy”. The comments, by Rahul Gandhi, a ruling Congress party MP, were his first foray into the government’s standoff with Anna Hazare since the 74-year-old activist began a fast 10 days ago. Hazare’s action has brought tens of thousands of supporters, angry about endemic corruption, onto the streets. Gandhi’s speech came a day after an emotional appeal by the prime minister, Manmohan Singh, for Hazare to end his hunger strike, signalling a government attempt to take control of the corruption debate. Hazare had demanded that parliament pass his stringent version of a bill creating a government watchdog. He appeared to slightly soften his stance on Thursday after Singh offered MPs a debate on several proposed drafts of the bill, including Hazare’s. He said that if MPs passed a resolution backing some of his demands, pledging greater transparency and including low-level bureaucrats and state officials under the watchdog’s oversight, he would begin eating again. “My inner conscience tells me that if there is a consensus on these proposals, then I will break my fast,” he wrote in a letter to Singh on Friday. The activist, who has lost 15.5lbs (7kg) so far, said he would continue protesting even if he ended his fast, to push for other demands including giving the watchdog power to investigate the prime minister and judges. On Friday, parliamentary officials were trying to work out procedures for introducing the competing bills. Gandhi thanked Hazare for articulating Indians’ anger over corruption, but called his hunger strike a “tactical incursion” into government functioning aimed at undoing the checks and balances of parliament. “Today, the proposed law is against corruption. Tomorrow, the target may be something less universally heralded. It may attack the plurality of our society and democracy,” he said. Gandhi said Hazare’s protest gave the false impression that the creation of a strong watchdog would end graft in the country. “There are no simple solutions to eradicate corruption,” he said, proposing policies including government funding of elections and parties. “To eradicate corruption demands a far deeper engagement and sustained commitment from each one of us,” he said. Meanwhile, some of Hazare’s allies began raising concerns. Swami Agnivesh, a respected peace activist, divorced himself from the protest, saying he was puzzled that Hazare was still fasting after Singh had agreed to debate his proposal. “That was a great moment in our history, where the representatives of our nation got up to salute [Hazare] and appeal to him to give up his fast,” Agnivesh said. “To carry on, carry on with his fast, even after that is not something I am able to understand at all.” Retired judge Santosh Hegde, a Hazare associate who uncovered a multibillion dollar bribery scandal in the mining industry, said he also was disturbed by the demands being made on parliament. “I have been a judge and I believe in certain democratic principles. And to me, it’s very difficult to digest,” he said, according to the Press Trust of India. The tone of India’s media coverage, which had been strongly supportive of Hazare, also appeared to be shifting following Singh’s speech. “We believe Anna should acknowledge the PM’s gesture and call off his fast,” the Times of India wrote in a frontpage editorial. Rajdeep Sardesai, the editor-in-chief of the IBN 18 television news network, called Hazare a hero but also said he needed to abandon the hunger strike. “You are now an icon for millions. Please don’t allow a personality cult to shadow your ultimate gift of common sense,” he wrote in the Hindustan Times. But Medha Patkar, one of the protest leaders, said the government had not yet given protesters the concrete victory they wanted. “It is not enough to have made a point,” she said. “What is needed is a result.” Anna Hazare India Protest guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Indian MP from top political family joins government scramble to placate anti-corruption campaigner with reforms The scion of India’s most powerful political family has praised a reform activist for galvanising anger against corruption, but condemned his hunger strike as “a dangerous precedent for a democracy”. The comments, by Rahul Gandhi, a ruling Congress party MP, were his first foray into the government’s standoff with Anna Hazare since the 74-year-old activist began a fast 10 days ago. Hazare’s action has brought tens of thousands of supporters, angry about endemic corruption, onto the streets. Gandhi’s speech came a day after an emotional appeal by the prime minister, Manmohan Singh, for Hazare to end his hunger strike, signalling a government attempt to take control of the corruption debate. Hazare had demanded that parliament pass his stringent version of a bill creating a government watchdog. He appeared to slightly soften his stance on Thursday after Singh offered MPs a debate on several proposed drafts of the bill, including Hazare’s. He said that if MPs passed a resolution backing some of his demands, pledging greater transparency and including low-level bureaucrats and state officials under the watchdog’s oversight, he would begin eating again. “My inner conscience tells me that if there is a consensus on these proposals, then I will break my fast,” he wrote in a letter to Singh on Friday. The activist, who has lost 15.5lbs (7kg) so far, said he would continue protesting even if he ended his fast, to push for other demands including giving the watchdog power to investigate the prime minister and judges. On Friday, parliamentary officials were trying to work out procedures for introducing the competing bills. Gandhi thanked Hazare for articulating Indians’ anger over corruption, but called his hunger strike a “tactical incursion” into government functioning aimed at undoing the checks and balances of parliament. “Today, the proposed law is against corruption. Tomorrow, the target may be something less universally heralded. It may attack the plurality of our society and democracy,” he said. Gandhi said Hazare’s protest gave the false impression that the creation of a strong watchdog would end graft in the country. “There are no simple solutions to eradicate corruption,” he said, proposing policies including government funding of elections and parties. “To eradicate corruption demands a far deeper engagement and sustained commitment from each one of us,” he said. Meanwhile, some of Hazare’s allies began raising concerns. Swami Agnivesh, a respected peace activist, divorced himself from the protest, saying he was puzzled that Hazare was still fasting after Singh had agreed to debate his proposal. “That was a great moment in our history, where the representatives of our nation got up to salute [Hazare] and appeal to him to give up his fast,” Agnivesh said. “To carry on, carry on with his fast, even after that is not something I am able to understand at all.” Retired judge Santosh Hegde, a Hazare associate who uncovered a multibillion dollar bribery scandal in the mining industry, said he also was disturbed by the demands being made on parliament. “I have been a judge and I believe in certain democratic principles. And to me, it’s very difficult to digest,” he said, according to the Press Trust of India. The tone of India’s media coverage, which had been strongly supportive of Hazare, also appeared to be shifting following Singh’s speech. “We believe Anna should acknowledge the PM’s gesture and call off his fast,” the Times of India wrote in a frontpage editorial. Rajdeep Sardesai, the editor-in-chief of the IBN 18 television news network, called Hazare a hero but also said he needed to abandon the hunger strike. “You are now an icon for millions. Please don’t allow a personality cult to shadow your ultimate gift of common sense,” he wrote in the Hindustan Times. But Medha Patkar, one of the protest leaders, said the government had not yet given protesters the concrete victory they wanted. “It is not enough to have made a point,” she said. “What is needed is a result.” Anna Hazare India Protest guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Boy 16, dies in hospital after sustaining gunshot wound during mass protests against Chile’s president, Sebastián Piñera A Chilean teenager has died after being shot in the chest during huge protests in the capital against President Sebastián Piñera . Local media said the 16-year-old boy was shot near a security barricade as protesters battled police in Santiago on Thursday, the second day of a two-day strike against Piñera marked by violent clashes and sporadic looting. “The youth died from a bullet impact in the chest. He died in hospital,” a police spokesman said. Local media said witnesses blamed police for firing the shots. “The death of any citizen is a very serious situation,” said an interior ministry official, Rodrigo Ubilla. Led by students demanding free education, hundreds of thousands of people have taken to the streets in recent months to call for wider distribution of the income from a copper price boom in the world’s leading producer. On Thursday, youths blocked roads, threw stones and set fire to piles of rubbish at intersections in Santiago and other cities to block traffic. Police used water cannon and tear gas to defuse the latest social unrest against conservative billionaire Piñera’s policies. The government said that more than 1,300 people had been detained since Wednesday and several police officers badly wounded – two of them shot – as violence flared. Dozens of shops and supermarkets were looted and buses damaged. Organisers said around 600,000 people joined Thursday’s protest across Chile. Reuters reporters estimated crowds in the capital alone at around 200,000 people. Operations at some of the world’s biggest copper mines were not affected by the protests, which also seek to pressure the government into raising wages and revamping the constitution and tax system. While Latin America’s model economy has grown 6.6% this year and is an investor magnet thanks to prudent fiscal and monetary policies, many ordinary Chileans feel they are not sharing in the economic miracle. Investors, long used to economic stability, are weighing risk, although markets have taken the protests in their stride. Previous governments have faced one-day national strikes, but this was the first 48-hour stoppage since the 1973-1990 Augusto Pinochet dictatorship. A recent poll showed Piñera as the least popular president since Pinochet’s rule. A major cabinet reshuffle last month, the second since Piñera took power in March 2010, has failed to quell unrest. Chile guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• British warplanes strike bunker in Sirte • Scattered fighting continues in Tripoli • Executing Gaddafi without trial would be illegal – UN • Gaddafi daughter reported killed in 1986 ‘still alive’ • Read a summary of today’s key events 1.30pm: Nato’s bombardment of Sirte goes way beyond the UN resolution to protect civilians and everyone knows it, argues former British diplomat Craig Murray. The Sirte operation is the “apotheosis of liberal intervention” he writes on his blog: What exactly is the reason that Sirte’s defenders are threatening civilians but the artillery of their attackers – and the bombings themselves – are not? Plainly this is a nonsense. People in foreign ministries, Nato, the BBC and other media are well aware that it is the starkest lie and propaganda, to say the assault on Sirte is protecting civilians. But does knowledge of the truth prevent them from peddling a lie? No … I have no time for Gadaffi. I have actually met him, and he really is nuts, and dangerous. There were aspects of his rule in terms of social development which were good, but much more that was bad and tyrannical. But if Nato is attacking him because he is a dictator, why is it not attacking Dubai, Bahrain, Syria, Burma, Zimbabwe, or Uzbekistan, to name a random selection of badly governed countries? “Liberal intervention” does not exist. What we have is the opposite; highly selective neo-imperial wars aimed at ensuring politically client control of key physical resources. 1.05pm: Here is a lunchtime summary . Libya • Fighting between pro- and anti-Gaddafi forces continued in at least one area of Tripoli, with fighters loyal to the Libyan leader reportedly bombarding the capital’s airport, damaging a plane. Sporadic shooting was reported elsewhere, but the streets were generally quite calm. The Guardian’s Martin Chulov reported “organised chaos” in Tripoli’s overwhelmed Matiga hospital ( see 11.22am ). Médecins Sans Frontières has begun providing medical support to three healthcare centres in the capital ( see 11.01am ). • British warplanes struck a large bunker in Sirte, Muammar Gaddafi’s hometown and a hold-out for his forces, today. Yesterday Britain’s Royal Air Force attacked targets in Sirte and al-Watiyah, and the road between Tripoli and its airport ( see 11.15am ). Nato said it bombed pro-Gaddafi positions in Tripoli and 29 “armed vehicles” in Sirte ( see 9.37am ). The British defence secretary, Liam Fox, has denied Nato’s attacks on Sirte were about targeting Gaddafi. “It’s not a question of finding Gaddafi, it’s ensuring the regime does not have the capability to continue waging war against its own people,” he told the BBC. “The attack that we launched on the bunker in Sirte last night was to make sure that there was no alternative command and control should the regime try to leave Tripoli.” • Gaddafi is still in hiding, and the UN human rights commissioner said executing him without trial would be illegal. “Summary executions are not permissible in peacetime or in wartime,” a spokesman said. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International urged both sides in the Libyan conflict to treat prisoners humanely and respect international conventions ( see 9.18am ). • New evidence emerged suggesting that Hanna Gaddafi, the adoptive daughter of the Libyan leader, was not killed in a 1986 US raid as the regime claimed ( see 12.06pm ). • The US is reportedly anxious to secure Gaddafi’s vast store of weapons ( see 10.09am ). Syria • Protests took place across the country and security forces carried out waves of arrests ( see 11.52am ). In Damascus, security forces fired at protesters, reportedly killing two ( see 12.11pm ). Bahrain Bahrain’s most senior Shia cleric warned the Gulf kingdom’s rulers this morning to either ease their grip on power or risk joining Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi and other Arab leaders swept aside by uprisings ( see 12.13pm ). 12.38pm: The Economist has some details I hadn’t seen before in its coverage of Libya today. Shortly after armed rebels captured the state telecoms company during their entry into the capital, Tripoli, on August 21st they sent a note to millions of mobile-phone users saying “Long live free Libya”. Then they added the equivalent of $40 to all accounts and restored the country’s internet connection, which had been cut at the start of the rebellion. The magazine also has a good feature on who exactly the leaders of the rebel National Transitional Council – the leaders of the new Libya – are. The NTC is “a self-selected body whose nucleus was the group of human-rights lawyers who had organised the protests that snowballed into the Benghazi uprising,” the Economist writes. Its membership was then expanded to take in members chosen in close consultation with tribal and revolutionary leaders in western areas also rebelling against Muammar Gaddafi’s rule. The magazine pays tribute to the NTC’s strategy of making sure that “whenever possible, any advance on a government-held town was co-ordinated with an uprising of revolutionaries from within. This appears to have given each part of Libya a sense of having delivered its own ‘liberation’, as opposed to having been conquered by easterners.” Much of the “rebel manpower” is made up of 40 or more privately-organised and -funded militias known as katibas, or brigades. “Each katiba is usually drawn from one town, commanded by a respected local military veteran or, in some cases, by the businessman who financed it.” The magazine has an interesting line on the killing of rebel commander and former Gaddafi public security minister Abdul Fatah Younis, whose killing in July is still unexplained. NTC judges had issued an arrest warrant for General Younis on suspicion that he had made unauthorised contact with Colonel Gaddafi, but the killers themselves are reported to have been rogue katiba fighters with a personal vendetta against the one-time Gaddafi loyalist. They may have been members of the Abu Ubeidah Ibn al-Jarrah brigade, said to be a force of former political prisoners, some of them radical Islamists. After Younis’s death, the brigade was reportedly dissolved. 12.32pm: Back to Libya . New amateur video has emerged purporting to show part of yesterday’s gun battle for Abu Salim, where some rebels believed Muammar Gaddafi was hiding. The footage shows the intensity of the fighting: at several points there is so much gunfire that the sounds of individual shots blur into a constant loud hiss. 12.13pm: Bahrain ‘s most senior Shia cleric warned the Gulf kingdom’s rulers this morning to either ease their grip on power or risk joining Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi and other Arab leaders swept aside by uprisings. The sermon by Sheikh Isa Qassim was attended by thousands of worshippers, and was a show of defiance after Bahrain’s justice minister accused the cleric of promoting unrest in the nation. 12.11pm: Forces loyal to Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president, fired at protesters demanding his removal in the Damascus suburb of Douma after Friday prayers this morning. “Protesters phoned in to say that two people have been killed, but this is an initial report still to be confirmed,” an activist in Damascus told Reuters by phone. 12.06pm: New evidence has emerged suggesting that Hanna Gaddafi, the adoptive daughter of the Libyan leader, was not killed in a 1986 US raid as the regime claimed. Mary Fitzgerald from the Irish Times found documents in her name including British Council 2007 certificate saying she got an A in an English language course. Many have speculated that reports of Hanna’s death were made up for propaganda. Earlier this year Germany’s Die Welt said her name was listed on a document relating to Gaddafi family assets and that she was now a doctor in London. Fitzgerald’s discovery in ruins of the Bab al-Azizia compound report appeared to backed this up. Amid the bookshelves lined with medical textbooks and copies of Colonel Gaddafi’s Green Book [of his political philosophy], I found passport photographs of a woman, dressed in medical garb, who appeared to be in her mid-20s. Some of the rebels sifting through the room’s contents shouted excitedly: “It’s Hanna, it’s Hanna, the daughter Gaddafi lied about. This was her room.” I found an examination paper from a Libyan university medical faculty which was signed “Hanna Muammar Gaddafi” in Arabic. A photograph showed a woman who seemed to be Hanna with a group of people, including Colonel Gaddafi’s blood daughter Ayesha. A British Council certificate, dated 19 July 2007, showed that a Hanna Muammar Gaddafi had completed an English language course at its Libyan centre, achieving an A grade. 11.59am: Here’s my colleague Paddy Allen’s latest interactive map of the fighting in Libya . You can zoom in on Tripoli and Sirte. 11.52am: Nour Ali (a pseudonym) writes about today’s protests in Syria , which are being called “the Friday of patience and steadfastness”. Nour says this is the 24th Friday in a row that Syrians have taken to the streets and many – with thoughts of Yemen in mind – are afraid that a stalemate is taking hold. Protests have already been reported after Friday prayers from villages around the northern commercial hub of Aleppo to the eastern border town of Al-Boukamal, which activists say has been besieged on this week. “Few support the regime now but until there is a credible alternative, nothing will shift,” said one Damascus-based analyst. “We need the opposition to get their act together.” He said many questions remain in people’s minds including what will happen to the ruling Baath party, the security forces, who have carried out the majority of the crackdown, and the Alawites of president Bashar al-Assad’s sect. Despite increasing international pressure, the regime remains defiant. As international sanctions tighten, it is trying to rally Syrians by emphasising the damage it will cause to ordinary people. In an interview with AFP news agency Adib Mayaleh, the governor of Syria’s central bank, warned that Syrians will have to “tighten their belts”. “The ordinary citizen will suffer … This will create unemployment and poverty,” he told the agency. Syrians have been receiving text messages informing them that their visa cards will no longer work as an effect of sanctions. Meanwhile state media agency Sana says police are hunting for the men responsible for beating up dissident artist Ali Ferzat, whose attack was reported by the Guardian yesterday . Most people believe the regime was involved in sending what is being read as yet another message of warning to dissidents, but opposition activists admit that no one knows if security forces acting under orders or pro-regime thugs are responsible. 11.45am: In this CNN video , Rick Stengel, the managing editor of Time magazine, says the fact that Muammar Gaddafi’s leadership was never formally institutionalised may be a good thing as the rebels attempt to build a new Libya. “It cuts both ways to not have institutions. They can actually start creating a kind of democratic Libya right from scratch.” He said Libya’s small population and high oil revenue would also benefit the new government in the immediate future. But he added: It’s very hard to create democratic institutions in a country that never had them before. We’re still not actually sure who the rebels are, and whether there are a Thomas Jefferson or a George Washington or a John Adams among them. We certainly hope so. This week’s Time magazine has a horrendously misconceived cover showing Gaddafi’s head blowing away in a sandstorm. 11.37am: It may be premature to be talking of a NTC government in Tripoli, but on the diplomatic front it is being increasing recognised as such. The African Union could recognise the rebels as Libya’s legitimate government as early as today at a meeting in Ethiopia capital, Reuters reports. A South African government source said: There is a strong likelihood that the African Union will recognise the NTC today but call for inclusion of the Gaddafi regime in the interim transitional government … The reality is that the AU cannot ignore the NTC as a major player in Libya today and its stance will have to recognise that. Meanwhile, NTC chairman Mahmoud Jibril said he would seek a seat on the UN for the NTC next week. “We hope that next month Libya will be occupying the seat it holds at the United Nations,” Jibril told a news conference in Istanbul. Jibril also talked more about the plans to form a Tripoli government: When the regime collapses all eyes will turn to the NTC to provide the Libyan people with services they have been deprived of for the last six months, including power and salaries. In order to meet the expectations we need the finances. It is very important that the Libyan people don’t feel deprived of resources. We have to establish an army, a strong police force to be able to meet the needs of the people and we need capital and we need assets. All our friends in the international community speak of stability and security. We need that too. 11.22am: “The emergency room is awash with blood,” Martin Chulov reports from Tripoli’s Matiga hospital where scores of Gaddafi’s fighters are being treated after a fierce gun battle in the Abu Salim neighbourhood. Speaking by telephone from the hospital, Martin said: It’s a scene of organised chaos. The emergency room is awash with blood and iodine and people trying to clean up as more patients come in. What we are dealing with here is a large number of Gaddafi loyalists who were injured in fighting late yesterday. Many of them are in particularly bad shape. A couple of them look quite emaciated – they haven’t eaten or drunk for a couple of days and they have got some severe wounds. The doctors here say they are being treated just like any other patient would be; there is no discrimination. Of the battle itself, Martin said: It was a particularly lethal afternoon. There was a fierce battle that ensued in the suburb of Abu Salim … where an apartment complex was assaulted by rebels and defended heavily by regime loyalists. The rebels were speculating that there may have been some high targets inside that building. There weren’t. However there was a fierce firefight for it. There has been no more fighting today, Martin reports, but he says the National Transitional Council faces a tough challenge to form a government in Tripoli. They [the NTC] know they have to get here as soon as they can to establish some order [to Tripoli] to avoid things decaying. We are seeing large numbers or rebels arriving from the east. As we were arriving at the hospital there were large numbers of battle trucks from Misrata and Benghazi for the very first time. That seemed to a symbolic breakthrough for the eastern rebels. In terms of the political administration, it is not a stable city, and they don’t have a base here yet. But they will need to have one very soon. 11.15am: Britain’s Ministry of Defence has put out a statement explaining what British aircraft did in Libya yesterday ( Nato’s update is here ). The bulletin mentions an airstrike on Sirte. At around midnight, a formation of Tornado aircraft, which had set off from RAF Marham in Norfolk, fired a “salvo” of missiles at “a large headquarters bunker in Gaddafi’s hometown of Sirte”. The Tornado has a top speed of around 900mph and it is approximately 2000 miles from Norfolk to Sirte, so it would have taken them a couple of hours to fly there. RAF Tornado aircraft also “located and destroyed one of Colonel Gaddafi’s few remaining long-range surface-to-air missile systems, near al-Watiyah, close to the Tunisian border,” said Major General Nick Pope. And Tornados and Typhoons also destroyed a “command and control node” on the road between Tripoli and its airport. 11.01am: Médecins Sans Frontières has begun providing medical support to healthcare facilities in Tripoli. MSF said three centres it assessed “were suffering from massive shortages of life-saving medical supplies and equipment”. MSF has provided dressings, antibiotics, anaesthetics, and painkillers. Some centres also requested surgical equipment, “such as external fixators and oxygen”, which MSF will provide in the next few days, and will bring in additional medical staff. The humanitarian organisation said health facilities in Tripoli “do not have the infrastructure and systems to cope with an emergency on this scale”. MSF has also sent medical teams to Zlitan, east of Tripoli, and Zawiya in the west. 10.19am: In his latest audio address Gaddafi appeal to Libya’s tribes to fight back. Mohammed A Bamyeh, professor of sociology at the University of Pittsburgh (left), who has conducted research on the subject, argues that the regime has overstated the tribal nature of Libyan society. Writing on the Muftah blog he says: In Libya, actual tribal allegiance, understood as the loyalty that members of one distinct tribe have to their fellows, has never been unconditional … Since the current uprising began, Libya’s various tribes have issued numerous statements about the situation, which largely reflect the patriotism that pervades these groups. My personal examination of a sample of 28 tribal declarations, issued between February 23 and March 9, 2011, reveals that the vast majority highlighted national unity or national salvation rather than tribal interests. These declarations also demonstrate that Libya’s tribes are not homogeneous entities, but rather are comprised of diverse members with varying social and economic backgrounds. This reality reflects the nature of Libyan society as a whole, which has a 90% urban population and in which inter-marriages across tribal lines are common. 10.09am: The US is anxious to secure Gaddafi’s vast store of weapons, according to AP citing two officials. Some US intelligence officials have been pushing to expand the CIA’s role in Libya to track down the weaponry faster, unilaterally without the rebels’ help if necessary. They fear the rockets in particular may be quickly sold, ending up with al-Qaida or fuelling a Libyan insurgency for years to come, the officials say. Already, the prices of the shoulder-launched missiles called MANPADs have fallen on the regional black market, the officials say, suggesting some of Gadhafi’s stores are already being sold. Wired magazine’s Danger Room blog has more detail about the concerns about Libyan weapons . The ease with which the rebels were able to arm themselves points to their next massive problem: securing those weapons before they fuel a lethal insurgency or flood the global arms bazaar … Peter Bouckaert, emergencies director at Human Rights Watch, has spent time on the ground in Libya during the uprising. He tells Danger Room that “weapon proliferation out of Libya is potentially one of the largest we have ever documented — 2003 Iraq pales in comparison — and so the risks are equally much more significant.” Many in the west worry about the remnants of Gaddafi’s chemical-weapons program and shoulder-launched anti-aircraft missiles. However, Bouckaert says it’s Libya’s vast arsenals of low-tech gear like artillery shells and Grad missiles that are most likely to be fashioned into insurgent weapons, such as improvised explosive devices. 9.50am: AP has new footage of rebels entering Gaddafi’s tunnels in Tripoli . They found stores of food, water, banks of phones and files, and another golf buggy. “Now we are free we can do everything,” one of the rebels clearing the tunnel said. The Washington Post took a tour of one the bunkers . Forty feet underground, beneath a sprawling Gaddafi family mansion, lies a bunker that would have made a great place to hide. The entrance is hard to find: To get there, you go past the front door equipped with a fingerprint reader, through the garden and behind neatly trimmed shrubs, where there is a mysterious passageway. From there, it’s three flights of stairs down until you arrive at a one-foot-thick steel door. Behind the door, there’s a lair straight out of a James Bond film … As the rebel forces continue to hunt for Gaddafi and his sons, the nest of bunkers and tunnels beneath this capital city has become a prime focus of their search. 9.37am: Nato has confirmed that its jets bombed pro-Gaddafi forces’ positions in Tripoli on Thursday and hit 29 “armed vehicles” in Sirte. Here’s its list of “key hits” (pdf) in the last 24 hours. In the vicinity of Tripoli: 1 Command and Control Node, 1 Surface to Air Missile Transloader, 1 Surface to Air Missile Launcher. In the vicinity of Sirte: 29 Armed Vehicles. 9.18am: Human rights organisations have urged both sides in the Libyan conflict to treat prisoners humanely and respect international conventions. In a letter to the chairman of the National Transitional Council, Mahmoud Jibril, Human Rights Watch urged the rebels to allow international observers to visit captured prisoners, including members of the Gaddafi family if they are caught. It said: We hope you will ensure that the International Committee for the Red Cross is able to visit all prisoners captured in the fight for Tripoli – especially former senior officials and, if captured, Muammar Gaddafi and members of his family – as soon as possible after their detention. Detainees should be brought before a judge as soon as that is feasible. Amnesty International said: Both sides to the ongoing conflict in Libya must ensure that detainees in their custody are not tortured or otherwise ill-treated. 9.01am: A rescue ship for migrants stranded in Tripoli has loaded passengers in the city’s port after being anchored off the coast for two days while fighting raged. Pasquale Lupoli, regional director of the International Organisation for Migration, said: “It has not been easy to do this operation. We never expected it to be. Nevertheless, there is a huge sense of relief that all our efforts are in the end helping these migrants.” A second boat with a much larger capacity is due to carry out another evacuation over the weekend, IOM said. 8.19am: Welcome to Middle East Live. Libyan rebels have begun to transfer government to Tripoli while fighting and the hunt for Muammar Gaddafi and his family goes on. Here’s a run down of the latest developments: Libya • In its first Tripoli press conference the National Transitional Council said its cabinet would be moving from Benghazi to the capital. Al Jazeera quoted Ali Tarhouni, the NTC’s finance minister, as saying: “I declare the beginning and assumption of the executive committee’s work in Tripoli”. • The UN’s security council committee agreed to unblock $1.5bn (£921m) in Libyan funds that had been frozen since the start of the conflict. The money will be used to pay for humanitarian supplies, basic services in Libyan cities, and salaries for civil servants, police and soldiers who have not been paid in months. • As the hunt for Gaddafi continues a new audio message from the Libyan leader urged his supporters to continue the battle. “Don’t leave Tripoli for the rats. Fight them, fight them, and kill them,” he said in his third message since rebels captured Tripoli, al-Arabiya reports. • A central Tripoli apartment block close to Gaddafi’s ruined compound was the scene of a prolonged gun battle on Thursday. One rebel commander suggested Gaddafi, and some of his sons, might be holed up in the building, but others believed it had been used as a refuge by regime fighters who fled the carnage in the nearby Bab al-Aziziya compound. The New York Times reported that Thursday could have been the bloodiest day so far in the battle for Tripoli . In their drive to take command of Tripoli, the rebels concentrated their forces on a block-by-block battle for the streets of the Abu Salim neighborhood, a center of Colonel Gaddafi’s support. By late afternoon, the fighting had once again swamped Tripoli Central Hospital with wounded civilians and combatants. • Dozens of bodies have been found in Tripoli with signs of executions carried out by both sides in the civil war. The bullet-riddled bodies of 30 Gaddafi fighters were discovered by Reuters. Two had been bound with plastic handcuffs, and one was on an ambulance stretcher with an intravenous drip still in his arms. Medical workers said the bodies of 17 people, believed to be civilians, were discovered in the Bab al-Aziziya compound. • Secret documents from the Gaddafi regime, discovered by the Guardian, detail clandestine lobbying of Nato, a US congressman and even Barack Obama and the regime’s fear of full-scale US invasion. The Libyan government offered Democratic congressman Dennis Kucinich, an opponent of the Nato campaign, an all-expenses-paid-trip to Tripoli billed as a “peace mission”. • British and French special forces on the ground in eastern Libya are helping rebels prepare to assault Sirte, the last coastal town still in the hands of pro-Gaddafi forces, a rebel officer told the Guardian. The soldiers have taken a leading role not only in guiding bombers to blast a path for opposition fighters but also in planning the offensive that finally broke the six-month siege of Misrata, Mohammed Subka, a communications specialist in the Al Watum brigade, said. Syria • Syrian forces beat up a prominent Syrian political cartoonist and left him bleeding on the side of a road, in the latest episode of a campaign to quash dissent against the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. Ali Ferzat, 60, is one of the Arab world’s most famous cultural figures, and his drawings have pushed at the boundaries of freedom of expression in Syria. • Eight people were killed in the latest violence as more post-Friday prayer protests are expected today. Reuters said seven of the protesters were killed in the city of Hama, in the countryside of Aleppo to the north, in the northwestern province of Idlib and in Homs, hometown of Assad’s wife Asma. The eighth civilian casualty was a Turkish truck driver killed by a pro-Assad militia on the main highway leading to Turkey in the town of Rastan just north of Damascus. Middle East Libya Muammar Gaddafi Nato US foreign policy Syria Bashar Al-Assad Matthew Weaver Paul Owen guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Police investigation launched into deaths of Roger and Mathilde Lamb, who leave four children Police are investigating the deaths of a British couple said to have plunged from balconies in Morocco a week apart. Roger and Mathilde Lamb, who have four children, were on holiday in the historic coastal city of Essaouira when the tragic events unfolded. Mrs Lamb, 44, who was known as Tilly, is reported to have fallen from a third-floor balcony at a rented holiday home. According to local news reports she died from her injuries on Saturday – six days after the fall. Mr Lamb, a 47-year-old civil engineer, apparently fell from the balcony of a hotel in Morocco on Sunday. The Foreign Office confirmed that the couple had died in Morocco but gave no further details. The couple’s children are believed to have returned to the UK, where they are being looked after by a relative. Shocked neighbours of the Lambs, who have an £850,000 house near Pershore in Worcestershire, described them as “pillars of the community”. John Grantham, the mayor of Pershore, said: “Everybody is in shock.” A neighbour said: “Roger and Tilly were pillars of this community. It is an absolute tragedy for the family and their four lovely boys. “We will probably have to wait a while before the exact details come out.” The Rev Terry Henderson, of St Michael’s Church in nearby Great Comberton, said: “They were both heavily involved in village life and the local primary school. “Everybody knew them and hence everybody is very sad and very shocked.” A spokesman for West Mercia police said it had been made aware of the incident. He added: “Officers from south Worcestershire made some initial inquiries but the matter is now with the coroner for Wiltshire and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.” Mr Lamb was a geotechnical engineer who moved from Worcestershire to Christchurch in New Zealand last September. The rest of the family is said to have been planning to move out to New Zealand. Mr Lamb’s online CV describes his interests as “family, fell running and horses”. Morocco Africa Steven Morris guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Investigation finds Taliban attackers may not have been to blame for death of 25-year-old Ahmed Omed Khpulwak in July A BBC journalist who died during a Taliban suicide attack may have been shot dead by US special forces, an independent investigation has found. Ahmed Omed Khpulwak was one of more than 20 people killed in attacks on a TV station in Uruzgan province, in the south of Afghanistan, on 28 July. The Taliban was initially blamed for the 25-year-old’s death, but an investigation by the Kabul-based Afghanistan Analysts’ Network (AAN) said Khpulwak may have been killed by US weaponry once the Taliban attackers were already dead. “It seems – in what would be the worst luck of all – that Omed may have survived the suicide bombs only to be shot dead by US special forces when they entered the ruined RTA building,” the ANN investigation, published on Wednesday, said . “Evidence for this centres on the nature of his wounds, the timing of his death, ballistics and (hearsay) comments from police.” The investigation, by the AAN senior analyst Kate Clark, said it was clear that Khpulwak had died from gunshot wounds, but that “who pulled the trigger is less clear”. It said: “From the timing of Omed’s death, it seems likely that both the Taliban attackers, who were initially blamed for his death, were already themselves dead, but that still leaves the counter-attacking force, as made up of Afghan and international, probably US, forces. “The ballistics evidence points to Omed having been killed by a weapon used by the US military, although the possibility that such a weapon was used by Afghan security forces or even [the] Taliban has to be borne in mind.” The investigation concluded that the “vast majority” of people killed in the attack “died at the hands of the Taliban”, but added that “one civilian may have been killed by international forces”. The report said: “This case raises questions as to whether, in an admittedly dangerous and difficult situation, ‘looking Afghan’ can be enough for international forces to believe there is hostile intent and an imminent threat.” The BBC said it had made an official request for the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force to carry out an urgent investigation into the facts surrounding Khpulwak’s death. A spokesman for the BBC said: “Following the death of BBC stringer Ahmed Omed Khpulwak in southern Afghanistan’s Uruzgan province last month, various conflicting reports have emerged regarding the facts surrounding his death. “The BBC officially requested that [the coalition] inquires into the circumstances of his death and reports the findings to the BBC and to his family as urgently as possible.” Khpulwak joined the BBC in May 2008 as a stringer, and also worked for the Telegraph and the Pajhwok Afghan news agency. Afghanistan Taliban US military Journalist safety BBC Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …