Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 295)
Cameron defends deficit plans as IMF chief gives qualified support

Christine Lagarde says Britain must be ready to change tack as Downing Street rules out copying Obama’s Jobs Act David Cameron and George Osborne were forced to defend their fiscal deficit reduction plan after the head of the IMF said Britain may have to change tack if the economy struggles to recover. As Labour claimed that Christine Lagarde’s warning showed the danger of cutting too quickly, Downing Street insisted there would be no change because Britain still faced “fiscal risks”. The row broke out after Lagarde, the managing director of the IMF, offered a qualified endorsement of the plan to eliminate Britain’s structural deficit by 2015. At a joint event with the chancellor at Chatham House, she said: “The policy stance remains appropriate, but the heightened risk means a heightened readiness to respond, particularly if it looks like the economy is headed for a prolonged period of weak growth and high unemployment.” Osborne made it clear there would be no change. “Britain will stick to the deficit plan we have set out. It is the rock of stability upon which our recovery is built. It has delivered record low interest rates. “Abandoning that plan would put those interest rates at risk. For nothing would be more damaging for Britain at this fragile moment for the world’s economy than an increase in mortgage rates for families and an increase in the cost of borrowing for businesses.” But Tim Geithner, the US treasury secretary who was joined by Lagarde and Osborne at a meeting of G7 finance ministers in Marseille yesterday, also appeared to question Britain’s focus on deficit reduction and monetary, rather than fiscal, policy. In an article for the FT, Geithner warned of “unwarranted disaffection with the efficacy of the traditional fiscal tools of tax cuts and investment to encourage growth”. He added that governments with high deficits were right to cut but “can at least slow the pace of consolidation”. Ed Balls, the shadow chancellor, said that Lagarde’s warning should be heeded by Britain. “Christine Lagarde is right to repeat her warning that cutting too quickly will hurt the recovery and jobs and that there is scope for reducing deficits more steadily to support economic growth. This is clearly a message aimed squarely at America, the eurozone and Britain too.”Amid the criticisms, Cameron issued a ringing endorsement of the chancellor’s plans. The prime minister told the BBC: “We have one of the biggest budget deficits in the world. That’s why the OECD and Christine Lagarde and others have said that Britain is quite a special case. We have got to deal with that. The reason we have interest rates that are as low almost as Germany’s, but our national deficit is actually bigger than Greece’s, is because we have a plan to deal with our debt. We mustn’t give up on that.” Downing Street had earlier made clear its determination to stick to Britain’s deficit reduction plan when it flatly ruled out following the example of Barack Obama. The president attempted to boost the US economy by outlining a $450bn (£283bn) jobs plan to Congress on Thursday night . Cameron’s spokesman distanced No 10 from the White House by saying that the US was facing a greater challenge than Britain. “Of course they have had particularly bad news over a sustained period with their labour market. He is seeking to address that.” The spokesman said: “Every country needs to have a response which is appropriate to its particular circumstances. The US is in a slightly different position because it has a reserve currency. Therefore it doesn’t face some of the same constraints other countries might face. It gives them more flexibility to do that.” The US Jobs Act would also not add to the US deficit, the spokesman added. “It is true, if you look at what Obama said, that he has been very clear that the American Jobs Act will not add to the deficit and that [in] the agreement passed in July, which cut government spending, he will be looking for more measures to cover the full cost of the Jobs Act.” The spokesman said Britain had to act with caution because it faced “fiscal risks”. He said: “Those countries which have particular fiscal risks – and remember we have the biggest deficit of any country pretty much – those countries need to take action to address their deficits and to consolidate.” Lagarde praised Obama’s plan. “We welcome the proposals announced by President Obama last night, which focus on supporting growth and job creation in the short term,” she said. But Lagarde added that she looked forward to hearing about Obama’s plans to cut the country’s debt. The IMF director added: “As the president also emphasised, it remains critical for the United States to clarify its medium-term plan to put public debt on a more sustainable path, and we look forward to the proposed consolidation plan to be announced in the coming days.” Treasury sources said Lagarde’s suggestions for future action were already government policy. These are: allowing the automatic fiscal stabilisers, which allow welfare spending to rise as tax receipts fall in a downturn, to kick in; and emphasising monetary policy. David Cameron IMF Economics Global economy Christine Lagarde George Osborne Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

I can’t locate video related to this Florida case, but this recent Dylan Ratigan segment touches on many of the same issues. So this Florida appeals court ruling says the foreclosing party must have an affidavit that is sworn to by whoever entered the information into their computer system. It will probably be modified on appeal, since it’s a pretty broad ruling — but it makes it a lot harder to foreclose, and it calls previous foreclosures into question. Personally, I wouldn’t buy a foreclosed house anywhere until you can document who actually holds the title, thanks to the bankers who ignored the property transfer systems already in place so they could bundle them to sell securities: In a decision that could have staggering implications on foreclosure proceedings statewide, an appeals court ruled Wednesday in favor of the owners of a Wellington home whose bank filed documents sworn to by employees with no personal knowledge of the case. The ruling from the 4th District Court of Appeal reversed in part a 2010 Palm Beach County Circuit Court summary judgment that said homeowners Gary and Anita Glarum owed LaSalle Bank $422,677. That amount was based on an affidavit of indebtedness signed by loan servicer employee Ralph Orsini, who pulled the information from a company computer ­– a move that appeals court judges said amounts to hearsay. “Orsini did not know who, how, or when the data entries were made into Home Loan Services’ computer system,” the decision states. “Orsini could state that the data was accurate only insofar as it replicated the numbers derived from the company’s computer system.” The ruling means the home on Amesbury Court, which has been in foreclosure since September 2008, can’t go to a foreclosure sale until the bank either gets another summary judgment or goes to trial. The Glarums still live in the home. Tom Ice, whose firm Ice Legal represents the homeowner, said Wednesday’s decision hits at the essence of the nation’s foreclosure robo-signing scandal in which tens of thousands of foreclosure court documents were signed by people swearing that they had personal knowledge of cases when they did not. While some lenders called the document problem a technicality, foreclosure defense attorneys called it perjury and fraud.

Continue reading …
Reince Priebus Thinks America is Ready for an ‘Adult Conversation’ on Entitlements

Click here to view this media MSNBC’s Chuck Todd spoke to RNC Chairman Reince Priebus about this week’s GOP debate and asked Priebus if he was concerned at all on whether Mitt Romney’s arguments against Rick Perry during that debate on Social Security might not work given the fact that now Republican Sen. Ron Johnson who beat Russ Feingold in Wisconsin called Social Security a “Ponzi scheme” as well and won . As Chuck Todd pointed out, the conventional wisdom that Perry’s rhetoric is going to turn off voters in the Republican base might very well be wrong, and Todd asked Priebus if that was what he learned after watching the race between Johnson and Feingold. Priebus responded by saying that “people understand that the government is making promises it can’t keep” and asked if we can “be adults” and admit that and said the second question is what we are going to do to solve it. He then went on to praise Paul Ryan’s and the House Republican’s plan to privatize Medicare and said he thinks it’s a “safe place” for all of our candidates to go and that “it’s pretty clear that we have to start tackling our entitlements.” Priebus went onto note that even the Obama administration has said that we need to tackle our “entitlements” and downplayed Perry’s over the top rhetoric, and Karl Rove’s criticism of Perry as well. Sadly, he’s right that we’re going to find out before long whether one, the Obama administration helps the Republicans in the next election and cedes the ground to them on protecting our social safety nets rather than hammering them on the best issue they have to make some gains the next election. And we’re going to find out if the Republican base is so far to the right that they actually think attacking Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are somehow winning issues for them, and they elect Rick Perry as their next presidential candidate. Given the mood of the electorate in Wisconsin now and the case of buyer’s remorse they have with how the GOP has been managing their state and that Johnson had a 36 percent approval rating in April of 2011 , I’m not so sure it’s such a good idea for Republicans or Priebus to be looking to that race as any indication of the mood of the electorate in the upcoming election and calling their views now “safe.” Personally I think it should be political suicide for any of them that still want to be giving tax cuts to the rich and going after, and I hate this word, “entitlements.” If Priebus thinks having an “adult conversation” on the matter is a winning issue for the GOP and wants to triple down on Paul Ryan’s privatization of Medicare during the upcoming election, I say bring it on. And if it appears the administration is going to help muddy the waters for them by potentially doing something like raising the age for Social Security or for Medicare eligibility, they need to be hammered for being tone deaf to the desires of the electorate as well. There are ways to make those programs solvent. Telling seniors you’ve got to work until you drop dead if you’re lucky enough to have a job and are still capable of working shouldn’t be one of them.

Continue reading …

In the wake of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, New York Times reporters overcame enormous danger and duress to perform often-heroic feats of journalism, as proven by the Pulitzer Prize winning “ Portraits of Grief ” series, which commemorated the lives of every single victim of the terrorist attacks. But in the months and years that followed the paper reverted to partisan and liberal ways, even when the subject was the deadly attack on their hometown. On Sunday the Times will print a special section marking the 10th anniversary of 9-11 (you can read it online now). In anticipation of the paper's commemoration, here’s a sampling of the paper’s years of slanted coverage related to the attacks. BOMBING BAGHDAD: JUST LIKE 9-11? On March 22, 2003, as the Iraq War began, reporter David Chen offensively compared the bombs over Baghdad to the attacks of 9-11: “ Baghdad Bombing Brings Back Memories of 9/11, ” likened the terrorist annihilation of the World Trade Center to the U.S. bombing of Iraqi forces in Baghdad. They watched it from the streets. They watched it from their offices. And to many New Yorkers, the scenes of a city under siege were achingly familiar. New Yorkers watching the televised bombing of Baghdad yesterday said they were riveted by the raw and uninterrupted display of American military might. But for some, the bombing brought back particularly visceral and chilling memories. They could not help thinking about Sept. 11, and how New York, too, was once under assault from the skies.

Continue reading …
Labour looks like a party of urban elite, Ivan Lewis warns in his essay

Shadow culture secretary says party’s ‘modernising zeal’ is blinding it to people’s concerns over identity and belonging Labour’s modernising zeal blinded the party to the way low and middle income voters felt left behind and angered by a system apparently weighted in favour of migrants, irresponsible bankers and those who chose not to work, according to a damning analysis by Ivan Lewis, the shadow culture secretary. In a book due to be published next week, Lewis also warns that too many voters felt the party “looks like and speaks on behalf of an urban metropolitan elite”, creating “a fog of cynicism” about anything it proposed. In a chapter for Purple Labour, a collection of essays written mainly by senior figures offering new policy ideas for the party, Lewis says Labour’s commitment to globalisation allowed too many communities to be destabilised in the name of economic progress. “The party’s instincts to be internationalist, liberal and champions of multicultural societies jar with the growing sense of insecurity of citizens buffeted by rapid economic and social change. “Mistrust about Labour’s instincts and values on identity is one of the reasons why voters have rejected social democratic parties all over Europe,” he adds. “In an age of austerity that suspicion will remain unless we are willing break free from outdated comfort zones”. The party has to insist there are no policy no-go areas, and must do more to build a new one-nation instinct in the country, he says. In an increasingly globalised world, he argues, “voters yearn for a sense of identity and belonging”. In a damning checklist, similar to some of the Blue Labour critique, he admits the party should have introduced a points-based system for immigration earlier, adding that Labour “underestimated the scale and impact of the influx of eastern Europeans and should have done more to address the effect this had on local communities, public services, and jobs and wages of UK workers”. He continues: “We should have done more to increase the supply of decent affordable housing, and continued our programme of welfare reform. Labour and the previous Tory governments should have acted earlier to tackle radicalisation in some Muslim communities by adopting a zero tolerance approach to anyone including religious leaders who preached hate, and by refusing to legitimise organisations unwilling to condemn extremism or the use of violence. “As market forces reshaped high streets and closed post offices we should have given communities greater support to take over facilities and community assets. Too often it was the state, the market or nothing. What about the community?” The sense of injustice was fuelled, Lewis claims, by “a system which to some appeared to favour receiving benefits and choosing not to work and irresponsible bankers who caused the financial crisis but continued to receive excessive payoffs and bonuses while everyone else was paying the price of their recklessness. Others felt migration was changing the nature of their community and undermining Britain’s way of life.” He also the EU is deeply unpopular institution run by a remote and bureaucratic and political elite. The public do not understand “why UK taxpayers should fund the cost of prison places for foreign nationals”. He also urges the party to understand “how large numbers of our fellow citizens feel removed from the cozy concensus of Britain’s elite and a Labour Party activist base that while becoming diverse still does not sufficiently look like Britain”. He says great british institutions such as the NHS the BBC and the army must be opened up. He also proposes a rite of passage for all teenagers so they undertake an educational project learning about their communities, family history and strengthen their knowledge of British history. Labour Ivan Lewis Politics Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
GP referrals fall amid claims of rationed care in stretched NHS

Department of Health data shows 4.7% fewer patients referred for first hospital consultation in April-July period of this year The number of patients being referred by their GP to see a hospital specialist has dropped by almost 5% over the past year, prompting fresh concern that access to care is being rationed as a direct result of the pressure on NHS finances. GPs in England referred about 3.6 million patients for a first hospital consultation between April and July, according to data from the Department of Health (DoH). That was 4.7% fewer than the same period in 2010 – 3.8 million referrals. The number of patients being seen by consultants after a GP’s referral also fell during the same period, from 3.1 million last year to 2.9 million – a drop of 5.2%. The two sets of figures do not match because many patients remain on waiting lists. The British Medical Association (BMA), the doctors’ trade association, said that reductions in patients’ access to healthcare were happening more often. “The NHS is under a lot of pressure to do less, for example through referral management initiatives, which seem to be on the increase. These may save money but for every lost referral there is a patient who is not getting diagnosed or treated, and a hospital that is more likely to encounter financial problems,” said a BMA spokesman. John Healey , the shadow health secretary, also warned that some patients may be missing out on drugs, surgery or other treatment because of the falling number of referrals. “While it is important to reduce demand for hospital care, patients will want reassuring that they are not being denied necessary treatment,” he said. “These figures show the huge pressure on hospital finances at a time when David Cameron is wasting millions of pounds reorganising the NHS bureaucracy.” The NHS in England is struggling as its budget increase this year is just 0.1% – after a decade of big annual rises – while it seeks to save £20bn by 2015. The efficiency drive was ordered by the NHS’s chief executive, Sir David Nicholson, in 2009, intending to free resources for the growing number of patients, especially elderly people, with long-term conditions such as cancer, diabetes and obesity. Nicholson has told the NHS several times not to limit services in order to meet the target. But Dr Clare Gerada, the chairwoman of the Royal College of General Practitioners , said the fall in referrals could be due to better care by GPs and the NHS’s efforts to reduce patients’ unnecessary hospital visits, as well as preventative medical help. The DoH denied that “less hospital activity” meant care was being cut. “Far from it,” said a spokesman. “We would expect to see this trend as the NHS helps prevent more people becoming unwell and provides more services in the community, closer to patients’ homes. Alongside more day-case surgery, this is a clear sign that the NHS is working more effectively for patients and more efficiently for taxpayers.” He added: “Decisions on appropriate referrals should be made by clinicians in the local NHS in line with the best available clinical evidence.” NHS Health GPs Doctors Denis Campbell guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Resignation of senior German ECB official Jürgen Stark sends markets plunging

Decision to quit fuels speculation that central bank policymakers are split amid fears that Greece could default The dramatic resignation of a senior European central banker sent stock markets plunging, amid fears that Greece is on the brink of default and the fragile consensus in Berlin over support for the ailing Italian and Spanish economies was close to disintegration. Bank stocks, down more than 5% in some cases, were the worst affected as the Dow Jones dropped almost 3% to below 11,000. European exchanges joined the panic with the FTSE falling more than 100 points to 5230. Speculation that several French and German banks would soon embark on massive capital raising schemes to offset write-offs on holdings of Greek debt, added to the febrile atmosphere. Greece issued a statement to say it remained solvent and would not need to seek funds beyond the sums already agreed with the EU and International Monetary Fund. Deputy prime minister Evangelos Venizelos said: “It is not the first time we see an organised wave of “rumours” about an upcoming Greek default. This is a game of a very bad taste.” But the statement from Athens failed to rally markets, which have remained wary of assurances by EU leaders that they will do everything necessary to keep peripheral eurozone countries afloat. Nick Bennenbroek, head of currency strategy at Wells Fargo Bank, said investors globally were concerned at the potential collapse of a European sovereign. “The European troubles are permeating across global financial markets” The decision to quit by Jürgen Stark, a member of the European Central Bank’s (ECB) rate-setting governing council, was quickly seen as a signal that policymakers remained at loggerheads. Stark, a German hardliner and former member of the Bundesbank board, has lobbied for the ECB to impose stricter austerity measures on Greece and Portugal and to reject using its funds to purchase Italian and Spanish bonds until Rome and Madrid have made further efforts to reduce their debts and institute reforms. At a press conference on Thursday ECB boss Jean-Claude Trichet appeared visibly rattled by questioning from German journalists who asked if the eurozone’s largest economy should quit rather than keep subsidising indebted countries. Trichet said, in a clear warning to colleagues, including Stark, that Germany had prospered from the euro and should maintain its commitment during the worst crisis since the second world war. However, the clear disagreements at the most senior levels of eurozone policymaking have fuelled concerns that the euro is now beyond rescue and will fall apart. Stark has been a consistent critic of the ECB’s programme of purchasing government bonds of debt-ridden European nations in the markets. He has said eurobonds, which many economists believe are the only way to save the euro, would create false incentives for indebted countries. The cost of borrowing for the German government has increased as investors price in the risk of it absorbing the debts of all eurozone members through the creation of eurobonds. Greek borrowing rates have hit stratospheric highs this week; 62% for two-year money, while a three-year bond maturing next year hit 129%. But officials in Athens hinted that the deadline for private-sector involvement in a second €109bn bailout programme had finally been met. The programme includes private financial groups agreeing to a €135bn debt-swap scheme. The debt-swap is an integral part of the deal agreed by EU leaders at an emergency summit in July. However, many economists say the swap is not big enough and last night it was understood that as few as 70% of bondholders would agree to take part. The socialist government had said previously it would not go ahead with the deal if participation fell below 90 percent. EU Commissioner Olli Rehn, who is responsible for economic and monetary affairs, has argued the opposite, claiming the introduction of euro securities would “strengthen fiscal discipline and increase stability in the euro area through markets”. Some analysts said Stark’s departure signals a victory for Angela Merkel and French prime minister Nicolas Sarkozy, who have lent on the ECB to relax its rules on lending to Greece, Italy and Spain. The arrival of Italian central bank boss Mario Draghi as head of the ECB is also expected to cement control over the ECB by a more doveish majority keen to preserve the current membership of the euro. European debt crisis European Central Bank Euro Phillip Inman Helena Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Resignation of senior German ECB official Jürgen Stark sends markets plunging

Decision to quit fuels speculation that central bank policymakers are split amid fears that Greece could default The dramatic resignation of a senior European central banker sent stock markets plunging, amid fears that Greece is on the brink of default and the fragile consensus in Berlin over support for the ailing Italian and Spanish economies was close to disintegration. Bank stocks, down more than 5% in some cases, were the worst affected as the Dow Jones dropped almost 3% to below 11,000. European exchanges joined the panic with the FTSE falling more than 100 points to 5230. Speculation that several French and German banks would soon embark on massive capital raising schemes to offset write-offs on holdings of Greek debt, added to the febrile atmosphere. Greece issued a statement to say it remained solvent and would not need to seek funds beyond the sums already agreed with the EU and International Monetary Fund. Deputy prime minister Evangelos Venizelos said: “It is not the first time we see an organised wave of “rumours” about an upcoming Greek default. This is a game of a very bad taste.” But the statement from Athens failed to rally markets, which have remained wary of assurances by EU leaders that they will do everything necessary to keep peripheral eurozone countries afloat. Nick Bennenbroek, head of currency strategy at Wells Fargo Bank, said investors globally were concerned at the potential collapse of a European sovereign. “The European troubles are permeating across global financial markets” The decision to quit by Jürgen Stark, a member of the European Central Bank’s (ECB) rate-setting governing council, was quickly seen as a signal that policymakers remained at loggerheads. Stark, a German hardliner and former member of the Bundesbank board, has lobbied for the ECB to impose stricter austerity measures on Greece and Portugal and to reject using its funds to purchase Italian and Spanish bonds until Rome and Madrid have made further efforts to reduce their debts and institute reforms. At a press conference on Thursday ECB boss Jean-Claude Trichet appeared visibly rattled by questioning from German journalists who asked if the eurozone’s largest economy should quit rather than keep subsidising indebted countries. Trichet said, in a clear warning to colleagues, including Stark, that Germany had prospered from the euro and should maintain its commitment during the worst crisis since the second world war. However, the clear disagreements at the most senior levels of eurozone policymaking have fuelled concerns that the euro is now beyond rescue and will fall apart. Stark has been a consistent critic of the ECB’s programme of purchasing government bonds of debt-ridden European nations in the markets. He has said eurobonds, which many economists believe are the only way to save the euro, would create false incentives for indebted countries. The cost of borrowing for the German government has increased as investors price in the risk of it absorbing the debts of all eurozone members through the creation of eurobonds. Greek borrowing rates have hit stratospheric highs this week; 62% for two-year money, while a three-year bond maturing next year hit 129%. But officials in Athens hinted that the deadline for private-sector involvement in a second €109bn bailout programme had finally been met. The programme includes private financial groups agreeing to a €135bn debt-swap scheme. The debt-swap is an integral part of the deal agreed by EU leaders at an emergency summit in July. However, many economists say the swap is not big enough and last night it was understood that as few as 70% of bondholders would agree to take part. The socialist government had said previously it would not go ahead with the deal if participation fell below 90 percent. EU Commissioner Olli Rehn, who is responsible for economic and monetary affairs, has argued the opposite, claiming the introduction of euro securities would “strengthen fiscal discipline and increase stability in the euro area through markets”. Some analysts said Stark’s departure signals a victory for Angela Merkel and French prime minister Nicolas Sarkozy, who have lent on the ECB to relax its rules on lending to Greece, Italy and Spain. The arrival of Italian central bank boss Mario Draghi as head of the ECB is also expected to cement control over the ECB by a more doveish majority keen to preserve the current membership of the euro. European debt crisis European Central Bank Euro Phillip Inman Helena Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Hiding in the Caribbean: the fugitive trader who bankrolled the Lib Dems

Michael Brown who gave £2.4m to party before 2005 election is now hiding in the Dominican Republic under a false British identity The Liberal Democrats’ biggest donor, who has been on the run for three years after being convicted of a multimillion pound theft, is hiding in the Dominican Republic under a false British identity, the Guardian can disclose. Michael Brown, 45, the convicted Glaswegian who bankrolled the party with £2.4m of stolen money, is being sought by British authorities on the Caribbean island but is currently at large. Brown disappeared from Britain while on parole and was sentenced in his absence to seven years in prison. The disclosure of Brown’s bolthole will be an embarrassment for Nick Clegg. His party has refused to compensate Brown’s victims, some of whom claim their money went directly into the party’s coffers to finance the 2005 election campaign. City of London police detectives have been in talks with the Crown Prosecution Service over how to bring back Brown. The Dominican Republic does not have an extradition treaty with Britain. The Home Office is believed to have approached its government for help in apprehending him. While on the island, Brown has been based in the province of La Altagracia, the easternmost tip of the Republic close to some of its most beautiful beaches. One source with knowledge of Brown said he has lived a low-key but pleasant life. “His businesses have been doing OK. He has lived in a wealthy area, he loves the beaches and he plays golf on some of the world’s best courses. It could be worse.” Brown, who was using an alias, was held on remand by the Dominican authorities while he was investigated over an oil deal. Court papers from the country’s capital in Santa Domingo show he was accused by a Dominican businessman in February of failing to honour a contract for 4,820 tonnes of oil. He was ordered to be held for three months while the investigation continued. Its outcome is not known. It has also been established that he launched a real estate business in 2008 based in the Republic, and has launched a subsidiary in Nassau in the Bahamas. Michael Robert Alexander Brown appeared from nowhere when he approached the Liberal Democrats in November 2004 with a generous offer of money for Charles Kennedy’s impending election campaign. The brash, ponytailed Brown claimed to be an offshore trader living in Majorca. His claimed his clients were vetted by US embassy officials. Despite not being a party member, not being registered to vote and living abroad, he was welcomed with open arms by the party’s grandees. Money came through his company, 5th Avenue Partners, in four tranches. It remains the biggest donation ever received by the party from an individual. In the general election, the party increased its share of the vote by nearly 4% after the cash was spent on posters and advertising. Brown told journalists that he had given the enormous donation because he liked Kennedy. “Charles is my kind of man. And I like to see a level playing field,” he said. Within months, Brown was flying Kennedy across Britain in a private jet and was being invited to dinners in Mayfair. Former Lib Dem insiders say he dazzled them with stories of Gordonstoun public school and St Andrew’s University. In fact, he had failed his maths O-level at his local school and completed a City and Guilds in catering at Glasgow College of Food Technology. He had no US government links – although he was wanted in Florida for cheque fraud. Brown was arrested in late 2005 after four former clients came forward claiming he had duped them out of more than £40m in a high-yield fraud. His victims included Martin Edwards, the former Manchester United chairman, who had invested £8m with 5th Avenue Partners. In June 2008, while awaiting trial for theft, false accounting and perverting the course of justice, Brown fled and a warrant was issued for his arrest. In the weeks before he disappeared from his Hampstead bail address in north London, he changed his name on the electoral roll to Campbell-Brown and allowed his hair to turn grey. In his absence the court was told that the political donation was made to impress clients and create an air of importance and influence around Brown. The disclosure of his whereabouts has given hope to Brown’s victims who are still owed millions. A copy of the passport that Brown has been using has been obtained by the Guardian. It shows a noticeably older and gaunt Brown, sporting dark hair and a goatee beard, compared with photographs taken four years ago when he was awaiting trial. He is believed to have adopted someone else’s real identity which has been obscured at the request of the police. Tony Brown, managing partner at law firm Bivonas which represents US attorney Robert Mann who was lost more than $5m (£3m), said: “This development may allow us to pursue Brown’s assets in the Dominican Republic for our client.” Mann’s legal team was forced last year to drop a high court claim against the Lib Dems for the return of around $600,000 after running out of funds. He hopes that if Brown is returned to Britain, any subsequent court case could cause further uncomfortable questions for the party.The Liberal Democrats have maintained that the money was received in good faith and have been cleared by an Electoral Commission inquiry into Brown’s donations. A police investigation has been launched this week into how Brown fraudulently obtained a passport. A spokesman for City of London police declined to comment. The Home Office declined to comment. Liberal Democrats Liberal Democrat conference 2010 Liberal Democrat conference 2011 Dominican Republic Rajeev Syal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Hiding in the Caribbean: the fugitive trader who bankrolled the Lib Dems

Michael Brown who gave £2.4m to party before 2005 election is now hiding in the Dominican Republic under a false British identity The Liberal Democrats’ biggest donor, who has been on the run for three years after being convicted of a multimillion pound theft, is hiding in the Dominican Republic under a false British identity, the Guardian can disclose. Michael Brown, 45, the convicted Glaswegian who bankrolled the party with £2.4m of stolen money, is being sought by British authorities on the Caribbean island but is currently at large. Brown disappeared from Britain while on parole and was sentenced in his absence to seven years in prison. The disclosure of Brown’s bolthole will be an embarrassment for Nick Clegg. His party has refused to compensate Brown’s victims, some of whom claim their money went directly into the party’s coffers to finance the 2005 election campaign. City of London police detectives have been in talks with the Crown Prosecution Service over how to bring back Brown. The Dominican Republic does not have an extradition treaty with Britain. The Home Office is believed to have approached its government for help in apprehending him. While on the island, Brown has been based in the province of La Altagracia, the easternmost tip of the Republic close to some of its most beautiful beaches. One source with knowledge of Brown said he has lived a low-key but pleasant life. “His businesses have been doing OK. He has lived in a wealthy area, he loves the beaches and he plays golf on some of the world’s best courses. It could be worse.” Brown, who was using an alias, was held on remand by the Dominican authorities while he was investigated over an oil deal. Court papers from the country’s capital in Santa Domingo show he was accused by a Dominican businessman in February of failing to honour a contract for 4,820 tonnes of oil. He was ordered to be held for three months while the investigation continued. Its outcome is not known. It has also been established that he launched a real estate business in 2008 based in the Republic, and has launched a subsidiary in Nassau in the Bahamas. Michael Robert Alexander Brown appeared from nowhere when he approached the Liberal Democrats in November 2004 with a generous offer of money for Charles Kennedy’s impending election campaign. The brash, ponytailed Brown claimed to be an offshore trader living in Majorca. His claimed his clients were vetted by US embassy officials. Despite not being a party member, not being registered to vote and living abroad, he was welcomed with open arms by the party’s grandees. Money came through his company, 5th Avenue Partners, in four tranches. It remains the biggest donation ever received by the party from an individual. In the general election, the party increased its share of the vote by nearly 4% after the cash was spent on posters and advertising. Brown told journalists that he had given the enormous donation because he liked Kennedy. “Charles is my kind of man. And I like to see a level playing field,” he said. Within months, Brown was flying Kennedy across Britain in a private jet and was being invited to dinners in Mayfair. Former Lib Dem insiders say he dazzled them with stories of Gordonstoun public school and St Andrew’s University. In fact, he had failed his maths O-level at his local school and completed a City and Guilds in catering at Glasgow College of Food Technology. He had no US government links – although he was wanted in Florida for cheque fraud. Brown was arrested in late 2005 after four former clients came forward claiming he had duped them out of more than £40m in a high-yield fraud. His victims included Martin Edwards, the former Manchester United chairman, who had invested £8m with 5th Avenue Partners. In June 2008, while awaiting trial for theft, false accounting and perverting the course of justice, Brown fled and a warrant was issued for his arrest. In the weeks before he disappeared from his Hampstead bail address in north London, he changed his name on the electoral roll to Campbell-Brown and allowed his hair to turn grey. In his absence the court was told that the political donation was made to impress clients and create an air of importance and influence around Brown. The disclosure of his whereabouts has given hope to Brown’s victims who are still owed millions. A copy of the passport that Brown has been using has been obtained by the Guardian. It shows a noticeably older and gaunt Brown, sporting dark hair and a goatee beard, compared with photographs taken four years ago when he was awaiting trial. He is believed to have adopted someone else’s real identity which has been obscured at the request of the police. Tony Brown, managing partner at law firm Bivonas which represents US attorney Robert Mann who was lost more than $5m (£3m), said: “This development may allow us to pursue Brown’s assets in the Dominican Republic for our client.” Mann’s legal team was forced last year to drop a high court claim against the Lib Dems for the return of around $600,000 after running out of funds. He hopes that if Brown is returned to Britain, any subsequent court case could cause further uncomfortable questions for the party.The Liberal Democrats have maintained that the money was received in good faith and have been cleared by an Electoral Commission inquiry into Brown’s donations. A police investigation has been launched this week into how Brown fraudulently obtained a passport. A spokesman for City of London police declined to comment. The Home Office declined to comment. Liberal Democrats Liberal Democrat conference 2010 Liberal Democrat conference 2011 Dominican Republic Rajeev Syal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …