enlarge That image is a pretty graphic representation of the right-wing’s successful voter suppression efforts , thanks to ALEC and a lot of reactionary state legislatures. But in Ohio, they’re mad as hell and not taking it anymore. Via the ACLU: Luckily, Ohio may offer a glimmer of hope for those of us fighting to safeguard voting rights. Voters around the Buckeye State are taking to the streets, circulating petitions that would allow a referendum to be held on Ohio House Bill 194 , a bill passed in June 2011 that would severely limit voters’ access to the ballot box by limiting early voting, prohibiting poll workers from assisting voters completing election forms and ballots, and making it more difficult for local boards of elections to promote early voting to all registered voters. Ohio is the same state that gathered 900,000 signatures to repeal SB 5 , the draconian anti-union law shoved through the state legislature, with ALEC’s willing participation and support yet again. But back to Ohio House Bill 194 for now. There’s an energy in the air, an energy that the right wing should worry about. People are quickly organizing petitions in all corners of the state. I signed the referendum petition myself last weekend at a church on the east side of Cleveland. A whole team of volunteers were holding signs and talking to passersby about the legislation. Voters came from miles around—the woman in line in front of me made an hour long drive from the Akron area in her minivan with a group of friends because she “just couldn’t wait to find a petition in my town.” This typifies the excitement many people are feeling right now. While the legislature and governor passed laws restricting our right to vote, Ohioans are not content to sit idly by. Many people feel that we can — and will — stand up for our rights and bring this bill to a statewide vote. In a time where the legislature, courts, and other elected officials are doing little to stop these types of bills from going into effect, it’s comforting to know the people are still willing to exercise their own veto power. The power of “we” is strong in Ohio. They need to gather 231,000 signatures by September 29th to stop the bill from going into effect on September 30th. If you live in Ohio, please sign the petition. You can find locations for petition drives here . It is heartening and ironic to see voters stand up for their rights in Ohio, the same state where voting machines gave the 2004 election to George W. Bush. I hope it catches fire in every state.
Continue reading …Appearing on Monday's NBC Today to preview his exclusive interview with President Obama, Nightly News anchor Brian Williams revealed some of his softball questions: “I went on to ask him when he's going to channel his inner Harry Truman, as members of his base have been asking ….I also asked him about all the people who voted for the man on the poster that said, 'Hope.' That answer was illuminating.”
Continue reading …Dmitry Medvedev and David Cameron express determination to build better relationship between Russia and UK but disagree over extradition of Andrei Lugovoi The Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, has turned the tables on David Cameron on his first visit to the country as prime minister, raising doubts about the UK’s court system and the level of corruption in British business. In the first bilateral on Russian soil since a diplomatic row damaged relations following the murder in London in 2006 of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko, the pair trumpeted agreements reached on British-Russian business. They made it clear that they were determined to build a better relationship while leaving unresolved major differences, instead focusing on the £215m of deals that had already been struck during Cameron’s trip. The one-day bout of intense diplomacy will later see Cameron afforded the first face-to-face contact for a British prime minister with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, since 2007. The press conference between Cameron and Medvedev saw much banter between the two men, with the Russian president saying he thought Cameron could have been a “very good” KGB spy – a reference to an earlier anecdote Cameron had told about travelling to the country in 1985 as a teenager and apparently being courted by Russians. Cameron’s joke suggested he had narrowly missed possible recruitment to the KGB. Though Cameron and Medvedev said publicly they had agreed to disagree on what should become of the man Britain suspects of murdering Litvinenko – Andrei Lugovoi, whom Russia refuses to extradite – Medvedev went further in questions put to him during the press conference. “You have to learn to respect our legal framework,” he said. “I would like to remind you of article 65 of the Russian constitution says a Russian citizen can’t be extradited for legal proceedings. We should understand it and respect it. “We have questions about how court decisions are come to in the UK but we are not raising these issues.” Cameron has been under pressure to raise concerns about human rights and the conditions for operating in Russia during his first official visit to the country. Today he rejected suggestions he was “parking” issues of human rights in favour of a trip to win business. Referring to the Litvinenko case, he said: “This is not being parked. The two governments don’t agree. We are not downplaying it in any way. We have our own position. But I don’t think that means we should freeze the entire relationship – we need to build a relationship in our mutual interest. “Both of us want to see progress. We are not parking the issue, just realising there is an arrangement that hasn’t changed.” But he was pushed to explain how he could call for British business to invest in a country with unstable conditions. On 31 August, BP’s Moscow offices were raided by bailiffs just one day after they lost out in a bid for a major Russian oil exploration contract. Earlier in the morning in a speech delivered to students at Moscow’s state university, Cameron had carefully acknowledged how hard British businesses found it to operate in Russia. Then he said: “I’ve talked to many British businesses. I have no doubt about their ambition to work in Russia… …but it’s also clear that the concerns that continue to make them hold back are real. “They need to know that they can go to a court confident that a contract will be enforced objectively… and that their assets and premises won’t be unlawfully taken away from them. In the long run the rule of law is what delivers stability and security.” But later when asked at the press conference why more British businessmen should do business in Russia when corruption appears to be unchecked, Medvedev said: “It is very difficult to deal with most states on our planet because corruption is a central element that exists everywhere. The open secret to you is that corruption exists in the UK as well. It doesn’t mean we are not prepared to deal with the UK too.” Cameron’s broad aim is to “rebuild” the relationship and put an end to the “tit-for-tat” behaviour of the two countries. He said: “I accept that Britain and Russia have had a difficult relationship for some time. And we should be candid about the areas where we still disagree. But I want to make the case for a new approach based on co-operation.” There were “sceptics” in both countries, he said, “who will doubt whether we can ever get beyond the competitive ideological instincts of our past”, but he said he would take on those groups. In his speech to Moscow state university he set out the British government’s position on Litvinenko, for the first time on Russian soil. He said: “Our approach is simple and principled. When a crime is committed that is a matter for the courts. It is their job to examine the evidence impartially and to determine innocence or guilt. The accused has a right to a fair trial. The victim and their family have a right to justice. It is the job of governments to help courts to do their work and that will continue to be our approach.” Describing his first visit, Cameron said at the beginning of his speech: “I first came to Russia as a student on my gap year between school and university in 1985. I took the Trans-Siberian Railway from Nakhodka to Moscow and went on to the Black Sea coast. There two Russians – speaking perfect English – turned up on a beach mostly used by foreigners. “They took me out to lunch and dinner and asked me about life in England and what I thought about politics. When I got back I told my tutor at University and he asked me whether it was an interview. If it was, it seems I didn’t get the job! My fortunes have improved a bit since then. So have those of Russia.” David Cameron Dmitry Medvedev Russia Europe Alexander Litvinenko Foreign policy Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …There have been some idiotic things said by liberal media members surrounding the tenth anniversary of 9/11, and “NBC Nightly News” anchor Brian Williams added to the list Monday. Appearing on MSNBC's “Morning Joe,” Williams said, “People forget the crazy pressure to put a flag on your lapel and without it you couldn’t be a patriot. You certainly couldn’t love your country” (video follows with transcript and commentary): BRIAN WILLIAMS, “NBC NIGHTLY NEWS” ANCHOR: Having listened to a lot of discussions on the war in Iraq in a lot of gatherings, I’ve settled on the word “elective.” It was an elective war on the part of George W. Bush because none of those pilots were Iraqi, because none of the people in those planes were Iraqi, and because as a wounded nation we gave a president in effect a blank check. People forget what a crazy time it was. People forget that when I left that morning, I paused at the intersection knowing my kids were both in the same school and I didn’t know if there would be another day in America. People forget the crazy pressure to put a flag on your lapel and without it you couldn’t be a patriot. You certainly couldn’t love your country. So that same pressure made for some, some judgments and some permission granted by the American people to their chief executive. Crazy pressure to put a flag on your lapel? In a time of war, one would think you wouldn't need to be pressured to do such a thing. Americans have for centuries shown support for those that have died in a recent battle as well as those still serving their nation. Anyone feeling pressured to do it, especially someone so in the limelight as a national television anchor, mustn't understand the way his fellow citizens feel. Media members like to talk about how unified we were after the attacks, and how wonderful it would be for such unity to return. “Face the Nation” host Bob Schieffer did so on his program Sunday. When we look at pictures of Congress singing “God Bless America” on the steps of the Capitol the evening of 9/11, we remember just how much we were one nation that day. Part of that unity is displaying the flag, and Americans should have instinctually felt a desire to do so. To ten years after claim that people were being pressured to show their patriotism and love of country following the largest attack on this nation's mainland is pretty despicable even for a liberal media member. The disgust he should have expressed the morning after the tenth anniversary of this tragedy was for those Americans who believed they were pressured to act in a patriotic fashion and didn't instinctively feel the need to do so following the death of so many of their fellow citizens.
Continue reading …I’m actually sympathetic to doctors — yet in some respects, not. I get into these arguments with them all the time: “There is nothing but your own expectations making you send your kids to private schools, buy an expensive house or get a new car every two years,” I say. “You’re complaining about paying for private school, yet you live in one of the best school districts in the state. What’s up with that ?” One doctor I know (and appreciate, because he keeps his fees low enough that I can actually afford them) is always crying about malpractice insurance premiums and tort reform. “I have a friend in Texas who told me they capped jury awards there, and the malpractice suits went down,” he told me. “I really wish I had your problems,” I said. “You’re saying that because you want a certain lifestyle, including a wife who stays home with your kids, that other people should give up their legal protections to subsidize that. When you make it impossible for victims to file lawsuits, it means your profession has made a conscious decision to subsidize the really bad doctors. That doesn’t seem quite moral to me.” Malpractice premiums are driven by other factors anyway. When insurance companies were making a huge profit and premiums were low, doctors weren’t complaining then. Now, when the industry has taken huge losses in the market, they’re trying to make up the difference. The problem? Capitalism! “Plus, you guys do a terrible job of policing your profession,” I said. “Remember, 95 percent of malpractice cases are generated by the same 5 percent of doctors.” (I used to be a medical fraud investigator; I saw the same familiar names, over and over.) Still, when I read about this study, the researchers didn’t mention that when doctors sign insurance company contracts, they agree they won’t offer reduced rates to the uninsured. It would probably be a less controversial and more popular approach to make those contract conditions (i.e. insurance profitability subsidies) illegal , don’t you think? WASHINGTON — Doctors are paid higher fees in the United States than in several other countries , and this is a major factor in the nation’s higher overall cost of health care, says a new study by two Columbia University professors, one of whom is now a top health official in the Obama administration. “American primary care and orthopedic physicians are paid more for each service than are their counterparts in Australia, Canada, France, Germany and the United Kingdom ,” said the study, by Sherry A. Glied, an assistant secretary of health and human services, and Miriam J. Laugesen, an assistant professor of health policy at Columbia. The study, being published Thursday in the journal Health Affairs, found that the incomes of primary care doctors and orthopedic surgeons were substantially higher in the United States than in other countries. Moreover, it said, the difference results mainly from higher fees, not from higher costs of the doctors’ medical practice, a larger number or volume of services or higher medical school tuition. Such higher fees are driving the higher spending on doctors’ services, the study concluded. The study examined fees paid by public programs and private insurers for basic office visits and for hip replacement surgery, and found that Americans were “very low users of office visits and relatively high users of hip replacement surgery.” “Fees paid by public payers to orthopedic surgeons for hip replacements in the United States are considerably higher than comparable fees for hip replacements in other countries,” the authors found, “and fees paid by private insurers in the United States for this service are double the fees paid in the private sector elsewhere. ”
Continue reading …Man helped from Travellers’ site brands Leighton Buzzard arrests ‘rubbish’ as nine men refuse to help investigation One of the men labelled by police as a modern-day slave at a Travellers’ site in Bedfordshire has accused officers of heavy-handed tactics and described the the arrest of five people on slavery charges as “complete rubbish”. Police continue to question four men and are looking for two further suspects. One heavily pregnant woman, who is expected to give birth imminently, has been released on bail. No charges have yet been brought. Nine of the 24 men allegedly used as slaves have refused to help police with their inquiries. DCI Sean O’Neil, from the Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire major crimes unit, said: “Those people who we continue to help are appreciative of the support that is on offer, but it will take some time to work through with them what has happened.” He said he was confident the operation, which is dubbed Operation Netwing, had broken up a criminal network. “The new legislation has allowed the investigation more scope and takes into account emotional rather than physical harm. I am confident that while the investigation is in its early stages this is a family-run ‘business’ and is an organised crime group that has been broken up by the Netwing operation,” he said. One of the men taken by police, who did not want to be named, said he had been living in a caravan on a Traveller plot on the Greenacre caravan park near Leighton Buzzard for several years, working as a paver and was being paid. “I think it’s all a load of rubbish and they just hate Travellers,” said the man, who is in his 50s. “Plenty of men who were here wanted to be here and they were getting paid. The police coming in heavy-handed like this is just wrong.” More than 200 police officers raided the site in the early hours of Sunday, aided by a helicopter and dog patrols. Armed officers were also present. Four men and a woman were arrested on suspicion of slavery offences, while 24 men were taken to a medical centre. Police said the men had been kept as virtual slaves in appalling conditions, forced to work long hours doing physically demanding jobs without pay. However, the man told the Guardian he had worked for 15 years with one Traveller family who had provided him with work and accommodation when he had nowhere else to go. After refusing to answer police questions he made his way back to the site. He said: “The police told me I couldn’t come back but I told them it was my home and if I wanted to go back I
Continue reading …Breaking news this morning. This was a major decommissioning site for nuclear weapons: One person has been killed and four injured, one seriously, by an explosion at the southern French nuclear plant of Marcoule. There were no radioactive leaks after the blast, caused by a fire near a furnace in a radioactive waste storage site, a French nuclear official said. A security perimeter has been set up because of the risk of leakage. The plant produces MOX fuel, which recycles plutonium from nuclear weapons, but does not include reactors. The explosion hit the plant at 1145 local time (0945 GMT). “For the time being nothing has made it outside,” said a spokesman for France’s Atomic Energy Commission (CEA).
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Well this is just stupid and pointless. That Major League Baseball had former Yankees’ manager Joe Torre deliver this wrong-headed move rather than commissioner Bud Selig is so typical of them. The clip above is edited from 9/11 Baseball Remembers , with the first games in New York following the events of 9/11/2001. No doubt MLB lawyers will be calling in a few moments. NEW YORK (AP) — Major League Baseball denied the New York Mets’ request to wear baseball caps Sunday night honoring New York emergency service departments for their game against the Chicago Cubs on the 10th anniversary of the 2001 terrorist attacks. Joe Torre, MLB’s executive vice president for baseball operations, told The Associated Press in a phone interview the decision was made to keep policy consistent throughout baseball. “Certainly it’s not a lack of respect,” Torre said. “We just felt all the major leagues are honoring the same way with the American flag on the uniform and the cap. This is a unanimity thing.” The Mets wanted to wear caps honoring police, firefighters and other first responders like the ones they wore on Sept. 21, 2001, in the first professional sporting event in New York after the World Trade Center collapsed 10 days earlier. And they spoke with Torre on several occasions over the course of the last month. Keith Olbermann is pissed off about it. Those bloodless MLB individuals have been down this path before. Ten years ago, Bud Selig’s initially ruled the Mets and Yankees could not wear the caps during games. The Mets ignored the threat, and MLB decided to give them a pass for a game or two, and then the Mets kept wearing them, and MLB wisely backed off their nonsensical decision. Tonight’s ruling reminded everybody that at the moment of the nation’s greatest grief, MLB’s money-making instinct was unhindered by the blood and destruction and fear. At least in 2001 the sport was smart enough to shut up. Not this year. MLB first blocked the Washington Nationals from wearing military caps in tribute after a disaster in Afghanistan last month. Then came this decision, complete with in the kind of stupidity that would make a megalomaniac proud: they blamed it on MLB Vice President Joe Torre, the native New Yorker who wore these caps at the end of the 2001 season. So if it hadn’t been shameful already, pinning it on Torre made it doubly shameful.
Continue reading …Documentary film-maker Nick Broomfield discusses his latest film Sarah Palin – You Betcha! Catherine Shoard Christian Bennett
Continue reading …