Oopsies. The US Chamber of Commerce spent a whole lot of money in the last election supporting conservative candidates and causes. Turns out, local Chambers aren’t so happy about being associated with that and are looking to end their memberships . The Chamber’s ads were particularly sleasy; many were patently untrue , while others criticized Democrats for supporting legislation that the Chamber actually asked them to support. Part of the Chamber’s strategy has been to manipulate the press and the wider public by falsely portraying itself as a community of small businesses and local chambers of commerce. Meanwhile, local chambers are upset that they are being unfairly associated with the U.S. Chamber’s far right partisanship. Politico reported today reported on the growing rift: “We were getting pounded. We felt here, in Central Pennsylvania, that the ads they were running were not professional ads ,” said David Wise, president of the Chamber of Business and Industry of Centre County, which is considering dropping its national membership. “This was not a unifying event. It was divisive.” Other chambers plan to take the extraordinary step of ending their affiliation with the U.S. Chamber, including The Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce. Its leaders reported being inundated with angry — and sometimes profanity-laced — telephone calls from people objecting to the U.S. Chamber-backed ads . Looking ahead to the 2012 elections, if more local chambers publicly declare their independence, it could undermine the power and credibility of attacks launched from the Washington office. You know, when the Chamber was first formed in 1912, its focus was strictly a non-partisan one, encouraging the growth of American businesses and the hiring of American workers. By the 1970s, however, the Chamber turned undeniably right-wing and stopped expending energy protecting American workers. But now those ultra-conservative, America-hurting policies–ones in which the US Chamber of Commerce fought for the right of corporations to out-source American jobs and benefit foreign interests –are running counter to the needs and interests of the local Chambers and they’ve had enough. Karma, baby.
Continue reading …Where would Glenn Beck be without his blackboard? Will he ever graduate to dry erase? So many questions! In this clip, Beck delivers some much-needed answers about WikiLeaks’ embattled founder Julian Assange—more specifically, about Assange’s sex life. Related Entries December 1, 2010 Amazon Evicts WikiLeaks November 29, 2010 Is Fox Censoring ‘The Simpsons’?
Continue reading …Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid postponed a test vote Wednesday while he worked on a deal with Republican Senator Susan Collins, but he earlier said he believed he could get the 60 votes needed to end the military’s ban on openly gay soldiers. Collins, meanwhile, said any effort to end the ban before the Senate decided whether to extend tax cuts for the wealthy would fail, TPM reports. Seventy percent of Americans favor ending the ban on openly gay soldiers. Lawmakers looking to dodge the issue have said that a vote should wait for the results of a Pentagon review. That review has since concluded that the risks of ending don’t ask don’t tell are low and “The reality is that there are gay men and lesbians already serving in today’s U.S. military and most service members recognize this. … Much of the concern about open service is driven by misperceptions and stereotypes about what it would mean.”
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Probably the most aggravating aspect of President Obama’s deal with the devil hostage-takers of the Republican Party is the way both the act itself — and Obama’s churlish spurning of the people who elected him at yesterday’s press conference — has been the opening it has created for the crass opportunists of the right-wing pundit class. Guys like Sean Hannity, whose greatest aspiration of the past couple years has been to separate Obama from his supporters, have been all too happy to take that wedge Obama has handed them and drive it right down our gullets. Take Hannity last night: HANNITY: All right. Amidst all the controversy on Capitol Hill surrounding the extension of the Bush tax cuts, one thing is crystal clear. This deal marks a major defeat for the anointed one who let political gamesmanship get the best of him. Well, now he’s backtracking on one of his central campaign promises. But apparently that’s not how he sees it. Let’s take a look at this exchange from his press conference earlier today. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) BEN FELLER, ASSOCIATED PRESS: You’ve been telling the American people all along that you oppose extending tax cuts for the wealthier Americans. OBAMA: Yes. FELLER: You said that again today. But what you never said was that you oppose the tax cuts, but you’d be willing to go ahead and extend them for a couple of years if the politics of the moment demand it. So what I’m wondering is, when you take a stand like you had, why should the American people believe that you’re going to stick with it? Why should the American people believe that you’re going to flip-flop? OBAMA: Hold on a second, Ben. This isn’t politics of the moment. This has to do with what can we get done right now. (END OF VIDEO CLIP) HANNITY: What can we get done right now? Now that sounds like the politics of the moment to me and the president’s base is fed up that he caved in. A brand new survey “USA Today” poll shows that a whopping 74 percent of those who contributed to the anointed one in 2008 oppose the president cutting a deal to extend tax cuts for small business and, quote, “higher income earners.” And even more frightening for the president, 51 percent of those contributors said that the tax cut deal will make them less likely to contribute to the anointed one’s reelection campaign in 2012. Well, that’s music to my ears. Hannity later invited on our favorite Faux defender of all things Democrat, Lanny Davis, who managed to point out that Hannity’s logic wasn’t exactly clear: Did he, as a conservative, really want Obama to stick to his guns? Remember, this is the same Hannity who just a couple weeks ago was declaring Obama too doctrinaire to ever compromise : Click here to view this media HANNITY: Well, look, I would argue and I have argued that Bill Clinton changed after ’94 and the Republican Revolution. I contend, and my analysis of President Obama is that he is a rigid, left wing, radical ideologue. And I’ve said it many times on the program. I’ve never seen any inclination in his adult professional life that he has a willingness to be pragmatic to move to the middle to change. Do you see that in him? Because I don’t see it. It’s clear that, in a right-wing field of pundits full of rank opportunists, Sean Hannity is one of the most rank and ham-handed in his obviousness. And it’s a reminder of what we all are up against. It’s too bad Obama doesn’t seem to have figured that out; he appears more than happy enough to castigate his thoughtful liberal critics as “sanctimonious” and hold his supporters up for ridicule, exposing them to this kind of garbage. But we mustn’t let our justifiable anger at Obama become a tool for right-wingers like Hannity and his fellow Fox pundits to divide and conquer. Obama may not be smarter than that, but the rest of us need to be.
Continue reading …Handily aligning with the unleashing of The Beatles’ music into the iTunes computerverse, as well as with the 30th anniversary of John Lennon’s death, Rolling Stone magazine has published heretofore unreleased portions of the slain Beatle’s final interview … (continued) Related Entries December 1, 2010 Amazon Evicts WikiLeaks November 29, 2010 Is Fox Censoring ‘The Simpsons’?
Continue reading …In the wake of November's election results there was much discussion in the press over whether or not the newly strengthened Republican Party would be willing to compromise with Democrats. However, since Monday's announcement of a deal on extending current tax rates, many in the media have been critical of President Obama for giving in to the GOP. Before the votes had even been cast in the midterm election, on ABC's November 2 Good Morning America, former Bill Clinton advisor and co-host George Stephanopoulos worried: “[Republicans] have to make a choice, as well. Do they choose to cooperate with President Obama or stand firm on principle, which is going to guarantee gridlock?” read more
Continue reading …The results of the Nov. 28 presidential election in Haiti did not sit well with thousands of Haitians, according to Reuters. They took to the streets around the country to protest Wednesday. Reuters: At least two people were killed in the flaring violence, which appeared to dash international hopes that the U.N.-backed elections held on Nov. 28 could create a stable new leadership for Haiti, an impoverished nation struggling to recover from a devastating January earthquake. Port-au-Prince descended into chaos as supporters of popular musician and presidential candidate Michel Martelly, who failed to qualify for an election run-off in results announced by electoral authorities, set up burning barricades of timber, boulders and flaming tires across the city. Read more Related Entries December 7, 2010 Elizabeth Edwards Dies at 61 December 7, 2010 Obama Attempts to Justify Tax-Cut Compromise
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Sure, President Obama may have negotiated his tax-cut deal with the ostensible Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell. But now the Teabagger King, Sen. Jim DeMint — the GOP’s real Senate leader — has come out saying “No dice.” A leading conservative voice in the Senate said Tuesday he will vote against the tax cut deal President Obama brokered with Republicans in Congress. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) said that he will oppose a potential cloture vote on the accord and a final vote if the package advances past a possible filibuster. “No,” the senator said his votes will be on the conservative Hugh Hewitt Show. DeMint’s stance indicates that a number of Republicans are not yet on board with the proposal in addition to a seemingly large bloc of Democrats in the House and Senate. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said earlier Wednesday he is “pleased” with the deal and hoped that “a large majority of members of the Republican conference will find this a proposal worth supporting.” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has lead liberal opposition to the plan in the Senate, reiterated Tuesday that he is prepared to filibuster the deal after Obama held an afternoon press conference to sell the plan to skeptics. The senator explained the timing of his announcement by saying that he was, “kind of holding my fire to let the liberals blast this thing first.” DeMint is following the propaganda line being laid out by the Club for Growth, the right-wing millionaires’ political arm, in their attacks on the deal, as you can see from watching the Club’s president, Chris Chocola, natter on endlessly this morning on Fox about how tax cuts have supposedly been proven to be the be-all and end-all of economic stimulus plans (when in fact just the opposite is true ). Dave Weigel thinks that DeMint’s not putting that great a stake into this position, but David Waldman at DKos wonders if it means Obama’s tax-cut deal is effectively defunct: DeMint said that “the biggest problem” he has with the plan is that it does not extend the tax cuts permanently. But would it matter if it did? Last week, DeMint ally Tom Coburn (R-OK) objected to and sunk another “deal” that “Senate Minority Leader” Mitch McConnell (R-KY) thought he’d negotiated and that would have given the Senate a chance at a vote last Saturday on just such a plan. Why? Because doing so gives Republicans more opportunities to screw with Democrats, that’s why. Is it true that all Republicans want is to serve the rich? Well, maybe. But if there’s anything they want even more right now, it’s to show the world the sight of Democrats losing as often and on as many fronts as possible. Who gives a crap about the taxes and whatnot? That’ll all come soon enough. Is it all just so totally chaotic and unpredictable that there was just no avoiding it? Well, I certainly haven’t considered Mitch McConnell to be the minority leader for some time now. And you know what? Neither has McConnell … Most likely this is just political theater thrown up for the benefit of the Tea Partiers. But we’ll see how this shakes out in terms of Senate votes.
Continue reading …A group of hackers organized under the familiar moniker of Anonymous (remember those anti-Scientology demonstrations ?) has registered its collective disapproval of MasterCard and the Swedish prosecution authority for participating in the censure of WikiLeaks and founder Julian Assange by, fittingly, compromising the functionality of their websites.
Continue reading …Most Americans are probably unaware that Jews were the victims of more than eight times as many anti-religion hate crimes last year as were Muslims. And the reason is simple: anti-Muslim crimes receive far more media attention. Case in point: the media has been all but silent on a slew of anti-Semitic acts of vandalism at Indiana University, coinciding with the beginning of the celebration of Hanukkah (h/t Stephen Richer ): read more
Continue reading …