Is CNN becoming irrelevant? According to TVByTheNumbers.com, the self-proclaimed most trusted name in news's prime time ratings this year are the lowest since at least 1997: read more
Continue reading …The Washington Post once again promoted the cultural leftists fighting the Smithsonian's removal of an ants-on-Christ video from a gay-left exhibit at the National Portrait Gallery. In a story headlined “Video outcry flares anew,” art critic Philip Kennicott covered a very one-sided panel discussion in New York with the exhibit's very political activists. The nod to conservatives came at the beginning, with William Donohue of the Catholic League telling Kennicott he wasn't going to this event — where the mudslinging was in full swing by curators Jonathan Katz and David Ward: Katz lamented that gays and lesbians were “once again being offered as raw meat” to political activists and the Catholic League, which he accused of being a hate group and anti-Semitic. “We have an American Taliban that we have not called as such ,” he said… Katz and Ward said they now worry about the lasting effect on the Portrait Gallery and on other institutions that might think twice about shows depicting gay subject matter, as well as on the dispiriting effect of criticism from the left at a time when the museum and cultural world should be mounting a concerted resistance to the right. read more
Continue reading …A White House review of the mess in Afghanistan will reportedly declare that some modest progress has been made toward the administration’s goals (vague and illogical though they may be), despite widespread skepticism and the most allied casualties since the start of the war in 2001. Reuters: A White House review of President Barack Obama’s Afghanistan war strategy being released on Thursday will report that foreign forces are making headway against the Taliban but that hefty challenges remain. The review, which the administration has indicated will not result in major strategy changes, is expected to cite hurdles including the need to strengthen Afghan governance and goading Pakistan to eliminate insurgent safe havens. Read more Related Entries December 15, 2010 Obama Makes Nice with Business Bigwigs December 15, 2010 Accused WikiLeaker Bradley Manning’s Torture by Isolation
Continue reading …Last year 95 percent of France’s civil unions (known as pactes civil de solidarit
Continue reading …Searching for an upside to the WikiLeaks release of secret documents, Late Show host David Letterman on Wednesday night pointed to how such disclosures could have possibly prevented the 9/11 attacks since former President George Bush had disregarded “for months and months and months” the warning “that bin Laden and al-Qaeda were interested in hijacking planes and flying them into buildings,” but not even Rachel Maddow, his far-left guest from MSNBC, bought his spin. Letterman contended: There is the viewpoint if WikiLeaks had been in business prior to the attack of 9/11 and we knew that George Bush had looked at a document suggesting that bin Laden and al-Qaeda were interested in hijacking planes and flying them into buildings – which largely went disregarded for months and months and months until long after the attack. If we had known that, via something like WikiLeaks, we perhaps could have acted a little more alertly. In fact, the Presidential Daily Brief to which Letterman referred, the one titled “ Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US ,” was presented to Bush on August 6, barely five weeks before 9/11, not “months and months and months” in advance. read more
Continue reading …Bill Clinton and now big business—all in a week’s work for President Obama in his ambitious push to improve relations with parties with whom he’d at least appeared to be at odds since he took office. On Wednesday, the president met for a lengthy huddle with a big group of executives from various market sectors to hold out a gilded olive branch and discuss the still-dismal state of the economy and how to improve the job market.
Continue reading …Bradley Manning, the Army private accused of leaking sensitive material to WikiLeaks, has been held for 7 months in what Glenn Greenwald reports are “inhumane, personality-erasing, soul-destroying, insanity-inducing conditions.” Greenwald argues that Manning is being punished without first being convicted, and he speculates that the treatment is meant to intimidate and discourage other would-be whistleblowers. Greenwald explains that Manning is held in solitary confinement, unable to leave his cell for 23 hours a day. He is not permitted to exercise in his cell. He is not allowed a pillow or blanket. Greenwald says Manning spends most of his day sleeping, and is now given antidepressants “to prevent his brain from snapping from the effects of this isolation.” Glenn Greenwald on Salon: From the beginning of his detention, Manning has been held in intensive solitary confinement.
Continue reading …Today’s Wikileaks release includes a cable from 2004 extolling the virtues of Ireland’s economic boom. In hindsight, we see what a failure Ireland’s decision to give large corporations special tax breaks was. In 2004, US Treasury Secretary John Snow visited Ireland for the purpose of studying Ireland’s “secrets of success.” At the time, Ireland’s economy was soaring largely because their corporate tax rate of 12.5% is the lowest of any industrialized nation. The resulting boom brought jobs and prosperity, which in turn spurred building, which spawned mortgages, which rocked the banks when the entire world went into a global recession. The Celtic Tiger was reduced to a meow instead of a roar, bent to the mercy of the EU with a shotgun wedding to austerity. But in 2004, things were rosy and bright. It’s worth looking at this analysis in retrospect, since the right-wing would like to use the same strategy now. Step One: Strike when labor is at its greatest disadvantage Fianna Fail,’s “great advantage” at the time, said O’hUiginn, was Ireland,s economic crisis; with 18 percent unemployment and government debt at 130 percent of GDP, the political opposition, industry, and labor could not afford politically to impede solutions. The PNR,s linchpin was labor’s decision to accept a moderate wage increases in exchange for income tax relief, which became the basic approach to successive national wage-setting (Social Partnership) agreements. Step Two: Get organized labor’s buy-in by calling it a Social Partnership According to Cassells, a shared understanding between unions and the Government on the importance of decent wages and housing for workers was the basis of labor,s commitment to the Social Partnership approach. He added that the transparency and inclusiveness of wage-setting negotiations, in which even the most disgruntled union representatives were given voice, were also instrumental to success. This section goes on to note that the wealth of young, educated Irish workers was instrumental as well. Evidently the Irish haven’t gone as far as the right-wing in this country when it comes to education. This part is good, but as you’ll see, it’s not all that important to the real meat of the deal. Step Three: “Dictatorial Leadership” This involved incenitivizing industries to achieve efficiencies by exposing them to the full discipline of the market, even at the risk of bankruptcies. The challenge in this approach, explained McCreevy, was to press ahead with reforms in the face of elections, which provided temptations for politicians to adopt softer, more populist economic platforms. Secretary Snow observed that whereas the gains from economic reforms in any country tended to be diffuse, the losses were often concentrated in particular sectors or geographic areas, making it easier for those affected to organize political opposition. McCreevy commented that the test of any government was how well it explained to dislocated workers that the reforms responsible for their plight were good for the country. So we have the unrelenting “market” discipline at work, and when it worked its magic and bankruptcies resulted (it’s unclear whether the bankruptcies were personal or corporate, by the way), workers got a government line that their plight was ‘patriotic’. Steps Four and Five: EU Support and US Offshore Tax Breaks Step Four is self-explanatory. Step five should tell us all why it is we can’t have nice things. The U.S. policy of tax deferral for foreign subsidiaries of American firms, combined with Ireland,s 12.5 percent corporate tax rate, underpinned the large influx of U.S. investment to Ireland during the Celtic Tiger period , observed Padraic White, former CEO of Ireland,s Industrial Development Authority (IDA). White recounted his numerous trips to the U.S. House of Representatives, Ways and Means Committee to defend tax deferral, and h e argued that Senator Kerry,s plan to reverse tax deferral would have “killed Ireland,” had he been elected. White believed that complaints by the U.S. public about the job outsourcing that accompanied U.S. investment flows were wrong-headed. While our economy stalled, we built Ireland’s. But as Ireland discovered, markets are a cruel mistress. They are indeed dictatorial, and what markets give, they can also take away. It’s interesting to me that the Irish government chose to guarantee every penny of the big banks’ exposure, rather than letting the markets shake it out. The tone of this particular cable is almost celebratory and certainly full of puffed-up pride over the ‘success’ of the Celtic Tiger. Meow.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media On C-SPAN’s morning call-in show Washington Journal on Tuesday, they took calls from Republicans only for reaction to Michael Steele’s decision to run again for Republican National Committee chair — and some of the responses were overtly racist, to put it mildly. I didn’t catch the entire segment, but these were two of the worst calls that I did hear, and I heard none that were complimentary to Steele. It doesn’t look like their minority outreach program went over too well with these two birds. I’m so glad that second caller decided to let us all know that he’s not a racist after he just twisted himself up in knots with his justifications for why he stopped donating to the RNC as soon as the black guy got elected to run it. MARYLAND CALLER: You’re not going to like what I have to say so you can put your finger on the dump button… I don’t want Steele to be chairman of the Republican National Committee because he’s black. I think we have bent over backwards to accommodate blacks in this country with the affirmative action stuff that’s gone on now for sixty years here. And it’s time we ended it. And as a black person I think he’s inhibited to come out and condemn some of these Black Panthers like creep up in Philadelphia who said they should start killing white children. And I’ve never heard a single word from Michael Steele condemning this guy. Now I’m… BRAWNER: Well what about the argument that the Republicans did capture the House, that they made gains in the Senate and that Michael Steele was the chair of the RNC at that time and has that record and that he made the point according to The Washington Times that this is… they need to make a bigger tent in the Republican party and show diversity? MARYLAND CALLER: I disagree with that. Diversity is terrible for any country. It’s destroying this country and it will destroy any country. […] ALABAMA CALLER: Yeah I agree with the previous caller a couple of calls ago about why they wouldn’t support Mr. Steele because he was black. I don’t have anything against black people, but I noticed after he took over all the letters that I kept getting from the Republican committee want me to donate my money they were wanting to keep supporting these RINO’s, what we call RINO’s, Republicans which really should be in the Democratic party. And so I just quit giving my money that I’ve been donating for about thirty five years every year to the Republican party, because of that reason. Because I just took my money and give it to the individual people that I wanted to vote for that were conservative Republicans and quit giving into everything that the Democrats wanted. And as far as getting the black vote for the Republican party, it’s never going to happen because you see what happened to Mrs. Clinton. You see how they praised her all those years about her husband being the first black president? Well they stabbed him in the back and they’re still stabbing white people in the back because 90% of the Democratic party in the black population, which I grew up in, and I’m not a racist… that I grew up in they want to tag the white people, all white people as racists, so the Republicans are never going to get to vote for ‘em.
Continue reading …