Scientists at University College London went poking around the noggins of a couple of MPs and 90 students and were surprised to discover that the brains of right-wing subjects were more prone to fear and anxiety and less so to courage and optimism when compared with their counterparts on the left. This being a small study done for the benefit of a radio show, one ought not to jump to conclusions. Also, because all of the test subjects were adults, the researchers could not determine if your brain makes you conservative or if conservatism shapes your brain. In other words, which comes first: the conservative or the coward? —PZS The Telegraph via Crooks and Liars : Scientists have found that people with conservative views have brains with larger amygdalas, almond shaped areas in the centre of the brain often associated with anxiety and emotions. On the [other hand], they have a smaller anterior cingulate, an area at the front of the brain associated with courage and looking on the bright side of life. Read more Related Entries December 28, 2010 Save Us From Our Devices December 28, 2010 A Reality Check for the GOP
Continue reading …The Philadelphia Unemployment Project demonstrating to save AdultBasic, the State of Pennsylvania insurance program to cover the unemployed. The Blues have refused to extend the contract. Why did the insurance industry try so hard to destroy the credibility of Michael Moore’s “Sicko”? Because once Americans saw what other countries had, they would begin to see what was possible — and that would be bad for health insurers. I’m pretty sure Americans would feel the same way if they saw the kind of safety net available to citizens in other countries — Germany, for instance. Via Democrats Ramshield, an American expat, writing for Alternet: The European Union has a larger economy and more people than America does. Though it spends less — right around 9 percent of GNP on medical, whereas we in the U.S. spend close to between 15 to 16 percent of GNP on medical — the EU pretty much insures 100 percent of its population. The U.S. has 59 million people medically uninsured; 132 million without dental insurance; 60 million without paid sick leave; 40 million on food stamps. Everybody in the European Union has cradle-to-grave access to universal medical and a dental plan by law. The law also requires paid sick leave; paid annual leave; paid maternity leave. When you realize all of that, it becomes easy to understand why many Europeans think America has gone insane. Der Spiegel has run an interesting feature called “A Superpower in Decline,” which attempts to explain to a German audience such odd phenomena as the rise of the Tea Party, without the hedging or attempts at “balance” found in mainstream U.S. media. The piece continues with the sobering assessment that America’s actual unemployment rate isn’t really 10 percent, but close to 20 percent when we factor in the number of people who have stopped looking for work. Some social scientists think that making sure large-scale crime or fascism never takes root in Europe again requires a taxpayer investment in a strong social safety net. Can we learn from Europe? Isn’t it better to invest in a social safety net than in a large criminal justice system? (In America over 2 million people are incarcerated.) Unlike here, in Germany jobless benefits never run out. Not only that — as part of their social safety net, all job seekers continue to be medically insured, as are their families. In the German jobless benefit system, when “jobless benefit 1″ runs out, “jobless benefit 2,” also known as HartzIV, kicks in. That one never gets cut off. The jobless also have contributions made for their pensions. They receive other types of insurance coverage from the state. As you can imagine, the estimated 2 million unemployed Americans who almost had no benefits this Christmas seems a particular horror show to Europeans, made worse by the fact that the U.S. government does not provide any medical insurance to American unemployment recipients. Europeans routinely recoil at that in disbelief and disgust. It’s important to note that no country in the European Union uses food stamps in order to humiliate its disadvantaged citizens in the grocery checkout line. Even worse is the fact that even the humbling food stamp allotment may not provide enough food for America’s jobless families. So it is on a reoccurring basis that some of these families report eating out of garbage cans to the European media. For Pam Brown, last winter was the worst. One day she ran out of food completely and had to go through trash cans. She fell into a deep depression … For many, like Brown, the downfall is a Kafkaesque odyssey, a humiliation hard to comprehend. Help is not in sight: their government and their society have abandoned them. Pam Brown and her children were disturbingly, indeed incomprehensibly, allowed to fall straight to the bottom. The richest country in the world becomes morally bankrupt when someone like Pam Brown and her children have to pick through trash to eat, abandoned with a callous disregard by the American government. People like Brown have found themselves dispossessed due to the robber baron actions of the Wall Street elite. I deal with this lack of insurance all the time, and it’s pretty depressing. But I’m one of the lucky ones. I now go to a federally-funded city health center (where I wonder if the guy hacking next to me has tuberculosis — or just the flu) — where they offer some services, but not others. If I have a heart attack or need surgery, well, I’m probably out of luck. So excuse me if I’m not absolutely thrilled that I’ll be offered bare-bones Medicaid coverage (something many providers won’t accept) a few years in the distant future: As the Great Recession has sown unemployment and downgraded work even for those people who have held on to their jobs, the number of Americans lacking healthcare has swelled beyond 50 million, according to a sobering new report from the Kaiser Foundation. Among the report’s most troubling findings: The number of Americans without any health care coverage grew by more than four million in 2009. That left almost one-fifth of non-elderly people uninsured. Among those between 19 and 29 years old, nearly one-third lacked coverage. The study underscores the degree to which the recession has accelerated the loss of basic elements once viewed as inextricable pieces of a middle class life. The number of Americans lacking medical coverage now exceeds the population of Spain. Nearly all Americans over 65 are insured by Medicare, the government-run health care plan, but those beneath that age are increasingly vulnerable to losing health care once provided by their employers or finding themselves unable to afford private coverage, according to the report, “The Uninsured: A Primer.” As those lacking health insurance grow in number, so do those missing out on necessary medical attention. About one-in-four uninsured adults have forgone care in the past year because of costs , compared to only 4 percent of those who have private coverage, according to the report. This isn’t a matter of who’s in the White House. Our entire system is persistently slanted in favor of the rich and powerful, and it’s getting worse by the day.
Continue reading …On Tuesday morning, CNN anchor Alina Cho interviewed Lorena Bobbitt – who unsurprisingly goes by her maiden name, Lorena Gallo – to discuss her recent efforts to reach out to domestic abuse victims and combat spousal abuse. However, the network not only failed to explain the specifics of her 1993 domestic dispute – where she infamously severed her then-husband John Bobbitt's penis with a kitchen knife –
Continue reading …Click here to view this media When President Barack Obama praised the NFL’s Eagles for giving quarterback Michael Vick a second chance, it was inevitable that the pundits at Fox News would feign outrage. But no one could have predicted that one Fox News host would go as far as to call for Vick’s death. “President Obama — it has been confirmed by the White House — called the owner of the Philadelphia Eagles and during the course of their conversation, thanked him for giving Michael Vick a second chance,” Fox News’ Tucker Carlson reported Tuesday while filling in for Sean Hannity. “Now, I’m a Christian. I’ve made mistakes myself. I believe fervently in second chances but Michael Vick killed dogs and he did it in a heartless and cruel way and I think, personally, he should have been executed for that,” he continued. “But the idea that the president of the United States would be getting behind someone who murdered dogs, kind of beyond the pale,” Carlson said. Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie told Sports Illustrated ‘s Peter King Monday that Obama called him and was passionate about Vick’s comeback. “He said, ‘So many people who serve time never get a fair second chance,’” Lurie said. “He said, ‘It’s never a level playing field for prisoners when they get out of jail.’ And he was happy that we did something on such a national stage that showed our faith in giving someone a second chance after such a major downfall.” White House spokesman Bill Burton clarified that Obama “of course condemns the crimes that Michael Vick was convicted of, but, as he’s said previously, he does think that individuals who have paid for their crimes should have an opportunity to contribute to society again.” Burton also said that part of the reason for Obama’s call was to talk about alternative energy plans for Lincoln Field, where the Eagles play. Carlson wasn’t the first Fox News host to be be upset by the president’s actions. “The criticism is to specifically praise giving Michael Vick this kind of a chance in some way excuses, perhaps, what Michael Vick did or sends some sort of a message to people that it’s not that bad,” Fox News host Megyn Kelly worried . Filling in for Keith Olbermann on MSNBC Tuesday, Sam Seder pointed out that while Obama didn’t excuse what Vick did, President George W. Bush did excuse I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby after he was convicted in the Valerie Plame case. “Tell me if I’m wrong here,” Seder asked sociologist Dr. Michael Eric Dyson. “In the media, at least, it seems to me that there appears to be two standards for two different crimes and for two different presidents.” “You’re absolutely right,” Dyson said.
Continue reading …Yesterday, we reviewed how other national networks skipped out on ABC’s accidental discovery in an interview last week that James Clapper, Obama’s director of national intelligence, had no clue about London terror arrests that had been splashed all over TV that day. Several newspapers picked up the story on December 23, but they were all stocked only with chummy Clapper supporters trying to undo the damage. Scott Shane’s article in the December 23 New York Times (headlined “White House Rallies Round National Intelligence Chief”) was mostly a White House recounting of why no one should be alarmed by Clapper’s ignorance. Readers were told the gaffe was “deeply misleading.” Shane began: “The Obama administration scrambled on Wednesday to undo the damage from an ABC News clip that appeared to show that James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, was clueless on Monday about terrorism arrests in Britain that had been a major news story for hours.” The scrambling paid off, because the Times quoted no one scolding Clapper, even the liberals who scolded him on MSNBC. It was all damage control: read more
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: Cook Political Report Since the filibuster reform topic seems to be heating up, it might be worth a look at what the future holds in 2012. Democrats have 22 seats up for grabs (including Independents); Republicans have 10. Of those 22 Dem/I seats, at least 5 are tossups as to whether they’ll remain Democrat or turn over to Republicans. Here’s the list of all seats up in 2012, via Daily Kos and the current Cook rating for 2012 : Daniel Akaka (D-HI) – Likely D John Barasso (R-WY) – Solid R Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) – Likely D Sherrod Brown (D-OH) – Lean D Scott Brown (R-MA) – Toss Up Maria Cantwell (D-WA) – Likely D Benjamin Cardin (D-MD) – Solid D Thomas Carper (D-DE) – Solid D Robert Casey (D-PA) – Likely D Kent Conrad (D-ND) – Likely D Bob Corker (R-TN) – Solid R John Ensign (R-NV) – Toss Up Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) – Solid D Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) – Solid D Orrin Hatch (R-UT) – Solid R Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) – Solid R Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) – Solid D Herb Kohl (D-WI) Solid D Jon Kyl (R-AZ) Solid R Joe Lieberman (I-CT) Lean D Richard Lugar (R-IN) Solid R Joe Manchin (D-WV) – Toss Up Claire McCaskill (D-MO) Lean D Bob Menendez (D-NJ) Solid D Bill Nelson (D-FL) Lean D * Bernie Sanders (I-VT) Solid D (Sanders caucuses w/Ds) Olympia Snowe (R-ME) Likely R Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Likely D Jon Tester (D-MT) Likely D Jim Webb (D-VA) Toss Up Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) Solid D Roger Wicker (R-MS) Solid R *Rumors are already swirling about Jeb Bush challenging Nelson in FL That’s a daunting list. We already know the damage the Citizens United decision had on 2010, and that was with about ten months to prepare. Now there’s two years. Two years for corporate interests to nominate their challenger to every single Democrat on that list. Granted, challenging isn’t the same as winning, but I think we’d better pay attention now, rather than getting caught flat-footed a year from now. The national Democrats (DSCC and DCCC) were incredibly ineffective at finding and fielding candidates. Far too many House seats went unchallenged, and when there was a viable challenger, they received absolutely no help from the national organizations. My district would have had a decent shot at a solid Democratic representative to replace our useless Republican, but he had no funding from the national party level at all. The state did what they could, but even a few ads would have been helpful. They also underestimated the value of a strong message. Instead of running from what they’d done, they should have wrapped their arms around it. They let the entire narrative be carried by the tea party and their corporate paymasters in far too many states. Harry Reid’s campaign was an exception but it could have had a far different outcome with a different opponent. Over in Kentucky, there was a real lesson to be learned from John Yarmuth. Yes, in the land of Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell, a progressive Democrat won and a BlueDog lost . Whatever form filibuster reform in the Senate takes, I’m hoping they’re considering it under a worst-case scenario where Republicans challenge hard and manage to snatch enough Senate seats away for a majority in 2012. As much as I loathe the current 60-vote majority rule, I would loathe a lesser requirement with a Republican majority even more.
Continue reading …enlarge Not that Goldman Sachs is the only vampire squid bank out there pushing global governments to the brink for their own profit, but I thought this was instructive. By the way, this is only a variation on the same thing bankers have done with U.S. cities and states on their pension obligations. My advice: If you’re introduced to a banker, spit on the ground at his feet. You can’t be charged with assault, but it gets the message across! Now, though, it looks like the Greek figure jugglers have been even more brazen than was previously thought. “Around 2002 in particular, various investment banks offered complex financial products with which governments could push part of their liabilities into the future,” one insider recalled, adding that Mediterranean countries had snapped up such products. Greece’s debt managers agreed a huge deal with the savvy bankers of US investment bank Goldman Sachs at the start of 2002. The deal involved so-called cross-currency swaps in which government debt issued in dollars and yen was swapped for euro debt for a certain period — to be exchanged back into the original currencies at a later date. But in the Greek case the US bankers devised a special kind of swap with fictional exchange rates. That enabled Greece to receive a far higher sum than the actual euro market value of 10 billion dollars or yen. In that way Goldman Sachs secretly arranged additional credit of up to $1 billion for the Greeks. This credit disguised as a swap didn’t show up in the Greek debt statistics. Eurostat’s reporting rules don’t comprehensively record transactions involving financial derivatives. “The Maastricht rules can be circumvented quite legally through swaps,” says a German derivatives dealer. In previous years, Italy used a similar trick to mask its true debt with the help of a different US bank. In 2002 the Greek deficit amounted to 1.2 percent of GDP. After Eurostat reviewed the data in September 2004, the ratio had to be revised up to 3.7 percent. According to today’s records, it stands at 5.2 percent. At some point Greece will have to pay up for its swap transactions, and that will impact its deficit. The bond maturities range between 10 and 15 years. Goldman Sachs charged a hefty commission for the deal and sold the swaps on to a Greek bank in 2005 while Henry Paulson was CEO.
Continue reading …From Greg Mitchell who’s been blogging on the WikiLeaks release at The Nation for the last month, CNN’s Jessica Yellin responds to Glenn Greenwald — inadequately : Jessica Yellin responds to Glenn Greenwald critique (see below) at CNN blog — but completely ignores his main point about her questions betraying a double standard on (or lack of awareness about) journalists routinely publishing top secret information thanks to leaks vs. WikiLeaks making such evidence available. Watch the video again — claiming she was just asking provocative questions doesn’t cut it. Here’s John’s post from yesterday on the interview in case you missed it — It’s a sad day when journalists collaborate with the government, again!
Continue reading …Of the three morning shows, only ABC's Good Morning America on Wednesday
Continue reading …