Click here to view this media After the popularity of the movie Kick-Ass last year you knew it was only a matter of time. The citizens of Lynnwood, Washington are now being protected by Phoenix Jones . From KIROTV : LYNNWOOD, Wash. — A local man said he came within seconds of having his car broken into, and perhaps stolen, until a real-life “superhero” came to his aid, wearing tights, a mask and a skin-tight super suit. The encounter started in Lynnwood Sunday evening when a man, who asked to be identified only as Dan, was walking back to his car in a parking lot when he saw a man with a metal strip trying to pry open his car. “He started sticking it down between the window and the rubber strip,” said Dan. Dan began to call 911, but said help arrived before he even finished dialing. “From the right, this guy comes dashing in, wearing this skin-tight rubber, black and gold suit, and starts chasing him away,” said Dan. What Dan didn’t know is that just about every night, an anonymous Seattle man strolls into a comic store, enters a hidden back room and emerges transformed. KIRO 7 Eyewitness News reporter Monique Ming Laven met him. “My name is Phoenix Jones,” said the man.
Continue reading …It's sad enough the New York Times' editors believe it “a theatrical production of unusual pomposity” that the incoming Republican Congress require “that every bill cite its basis in the Constitution.” It may be only me, but I'd be willing to bet those same Times editors would be running down the hallways, arms a-flailin' and citing a pure constructionist position on the First Amendment, if the new Congress required government oversight as to the content of their sorry excuse for a newspaper. But of course, the New York Times didn't stop there. Showing the originality of a rap artist skimming through the Rhino music catalog, in search of a 70's hit of which to lift an eight-bar hook, the New York Times reached into the liberal playbook and rather clumsily interjected the race card into the discussion. In any case, it is a presumptuous and self-righteous act, suggesting that they alone understand the true meaning of a text that the founders wisely left open to generations of reinterpretation. Certainly the Republican leadership is not trying to suggest that African-Americans still be counted as three-fifths of a person. Just because Republicans want to make sure any legislation they pass meets Constitutional muster doesn't mean they believe blacks be counted as three-fifths of a person, but maybe by using this example as part of their rebuttal the New York Times believes three-fifths of their readership are functionally ignorant of history. Or maybe three-fifths of the New York Times editors are as well? read more
Continue reading …Washington Post columnist David Ignatius asked a bizarre question on the badly-named 'PostPartisan” blog: “Is Darrell Issa the new Joe McCarthy?” Clearly, the Post knows that when a liberal blurs you with McCarthy, they mean you are a life-wrecking, fact-mangling monster fueled by demons like ambition and alcohol. The headline is designed for web traffic, since the normally calm Ignatius concluded: “Issa doesn't come across as a McCarthyite.” But Issa calling Team Obama “corrupt” was deeply upsetting to the Posties. Wrote Ignatius: It was scary, frankly, to hear Issa describe the executive branch under President Obama as “one of the most corrupt administrations.” What on earth was he talking about? This is an administration that has often tied itself in knots with petty ethical rules. Issa's comment bordered on demagogy. When you see the righteous gleam in Issa's eye, recall other zealous congressional investigators who claimed to be doing the public's business but ended up pursuing vendettas. I think of Robert F. Kennedy's ruthless pursuit of labor “racketeering” when he was chief counsel of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. And, more chilling, I think of Sen. Joseph McCarthy's use of that subcommittee to probe what he imagined was Communist Party subversion in America. read more
Continue reading …By E.J. Dionne, Jr. Alas for all of us and for American conservatism in particular, the new Republican majority that took control of the House on Wednesday is embarked on an experiment in government by abstractions. Related Entries January 5, 2011 Economic Suicide January 4, 2011 Darrell Issa, Step Away From the Corporations
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: Life Magazine Sen. Joseph O’Mahoney – even then the consensus was we were great at waging war and lousy at waging peace. Click here to view this media From a weekly radio program aptly titled Time For Reason , a talk by Senator Joseph C. O’Mahoney (D-Wyoming) , former Postmaster General and former Chairman of Indian Affairs, O’Mahoney delivers a talk on the waging of peace, right around the time the Cold War was starting to heat up. Sen. Joseph O’Mahoney: “It is becoming apparent that it is much more difficult to achieve peace than it is to win unwanted war. Men are already hopelessly talking about a third world war to be conducted with weapons more terrible even than those which were used in the last one. It becomes imperative therefore, if we desire to avoid such a catastrophe, to attempt frankly to face the facts, both with respect to ourselves and to the other nations of the world. Surely we are not deceiving ourselves if we say that the people of the United States have amply demonstrated in the two terrible conflicts of this century, that they have no ambition for conquest or aggrandizement.” For the time, cooler heads were prevailing, at least as far as June 24, 1947 (the date of this broadcast) were concerned. That would all change soon enough when the war to be waged wound up being a domestic one.
Continue reading …His defection from the Church of Scientology’s celebrity coterie was big news in 2009, and now writer and director Paul Haggis is following up with a detailed exploration of his former organization, in the form of a book collaboration with journalist Lawrence Wright. Related Entries October 15, 2010 Crashing ‘The Daily Show’ October 1, 2010 The Sale That Dropped 600 Points
Continue reading …In September, future House Speaker John Boehner unveiled the GOP Pledge to America , which among its other warmed-over Republican nostrums promised to save “at least $100 billion in the first year alone” from the federal budget. On the eve of the election (around the 1:50 mark of the video above), Boehner doubled down , claiming the GOP Pledge would quickly lead to “saving taxpayers $100 billiion almost immediately.” In December, incoming House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) repeated the GOP guarantee that “a good $100 billion” would be trimmed. Now, after months of cowardly refusing to specify what those draconian cuts to discretionary spending might be, Republicans are acknowledging their tough-talk was merely ” hypothetical .” As Boehner grabbed the Speaker’s gavel on Wednesday, the New York Times confirmed that among his first acts would be both the betrayal of the Republican base and his word to American voters: Republican leaders are scaling back that number by as much as half, aides say, because the current fiscal year, which began Oct. 1, will be nearly half over before spending cuts could become law. While House Republicans were never expected to succeed in enacting cuts of that scale, given opposition in the Senate from the Democratic majority and some Republicans, and from President Obama, a House vote would put potentially vulnerable Republican lawmakers on record supporting deep reductions of up to 30 percent in education, research, law enforcement, transportation and more. Now aides say that the $100 billion figure was hypothetical, and that the objective is to get annual spending for programs other than those for the military, veterans and domestic security back to the levels of 2008, before Democrats approved stimulus spending to end the recession. Of course, there was nothing hypothetical about the budget ax Republicans promised to wield in the actual text of their Pledge to America last fall: With common-sense exceptions for seniors, veterans, and our troops, we will roll back government spending to pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels, saving us at least $100 billion in the first year alone and putting us on a path to balance the budget and pay down the debt. We will also establish strict budget caps to limit federal spending from this point forward. A quick glance at the numbers, however, showed the Republican pledge came with an expiration date designed to come due on Election Day. As the New York Times and Bloomberg explained at the time, the GOP’s promise to immediately return to pre-recession FY 2008 levels for “non-security discretionary spending” with would result in devastating cuts to popular and needed programs. With the Pentagon, Social Security and Medicare off the table, those draconian cutbacks would slash more than 20 percent of spending by departments like Education, Transportation, Interior, Commerce and Energy: U.S. House Republicans’ pledge to cut $100 billion from the federal budget next year would slash spending for education, cancer research and aid to local police and firefighters. Keeping the midterm-campaign promise would require a Republican-led Congress to cut 21 percent of the $477 billion lawmakers have earmarked for domestic discretionary spending. Which is why Republicans before the midterm elections and since steadfastly refused to say what cuts they would actually make. Pressed by NBC’s David Gregory in October, then third-ranking House Republican Mike Pence could not “name the painful choice on a program that you’re going to cut.” Asked seven times by Chris Wallace of Fox News, failed GOP California Senate hopeful Carly Fiorina responded only, “you’re asking a typical political question.” Even as he touted the “GOP Pledge to America,” Speaker-to-Be Boehner dodged Wallace as well even as pledged an “adult conversation” on the budget: “Let’s not get to the potential solutions. Let’s make sure Americans understand how big the problem is. Then we can talk about possible solutions and then work ourselves into those solutions that are doable.” As David Leonhardt of the New York Times summed up the Republican charade: In their Pledge to America, Congressional Republicans have used the old trick of promising specific tax cuts and vague spending cuts. It’s the politically easy approach, and it is likely to be as bad for the budget as when George W. Bush tried it. During the lame-duck session of Congress, Republicans delivered on their budget-busting tax cuts for the wealthy. But when it comes to those spending reductions, the rest is silence. Within 24 hours of the election, Eric Cantor , Michele Bachmann and Tennessee’s Marsha Blackburn all did the duck-and-cover on spending cuts. With defense, Social Security and Medicare (not to mention interest on the national debt) off the table, the unexplained GOP pledge to cut $100 billion in “discretionary” spending would necessarily gut the departments of Education, Transportation, Interior, Commerce and Energy by more than 20%. To be sure, there’s no shortage of tough talk on spending from a GOP playing a dangerous game of chicken over the U.S. debt ceiling . Las month, incoming Kentucky Senator Rand Paul announced, “I think that every piece of major legislation that goes forward from now on needs to have attached to it spending cuts.” Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Tom Coburn (R-OK) warned of “apocalyptic pain” due to future deficits and claimed, “There’s well over $300 billion a year that I can lay out for you in detail that most Americans believe we should eliminate.” And, as CNN reported, House Speaker-to-Be John Boehner is promising to keep his GOP Pledge to America, declaring “slashing the federal budget by $100 billion will be priority number one.” Unfortunately, Speaker Boehner like his Republican colleagues still won’t say how. As CNN noted last month: Asked which programs will be cut to get to the $100 billion target, Boehner did not offer specifics. “But I will tell you,” he told reporters earlier this month. “We are going to cut spending.” Even today, Rep. Ryan chickened out , telling Meredith Viera, “I can’t tell you by what amount and which program, but all of it is going to be going down.” So much for that adult conversation. If this you think you’ve heard this story before, it’s because you have. In 1981, Ronald Reagan came to office promising to slash taxes and balance the budget. Instead, the national debt tripled under Reagan’s watch, only to double again under George W. Bush. Sadly, the American people put the Republican Free Lunch Party back in the House majority. In so doing, they ignored Bush’s own warning : “There’s an old saying…that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can’t get fooled again.” (This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Our own Susie Madrak joined Dylan Ratigan to discuss the response to the Boxing Day Blizzard which she wrote about here — Take A Good Look At Post-Blizzard New York City. This Is What Our ‘New Austerity’ Will Look Like . And of course Republicans are using the complaints about worker slow downs during the blizzard to attack public sector unions, gladly aided and abetted by their allies in the media. More on that at her blog here. Federal investigation : So let me get this straight. We see no criminal charges against the banking masterminds who crashed the economy, or the mortgage company crooks who are still stealing people’s houses with impunity, but this is at the top of the priority list? Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn have opened a preliminary investigation into allegations that disgruntled sanitation workers sabotaged the cleanup after the blizzard last week that left some neighborhoods snowbound for days, people who have been briefed on the inquiry said Tuesday. The investigation is focusing on whether there was a work slowdown and, if so, whether it was an effort to pad overtime. If the actions took place, two of those people said, they could constitute wire fraud or wire fraud conspiracy, both federal crimes. Both people spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation was continuing. The inquiry, which began last week, is being conducted by the Public Integrity Section in the office of United States Attorney Loretta E. Lynch, which will work with the city’s Department of Investigation, one of the people said. The city investigators also began looking into possible efforts to sabotage the cleanup last week. “We’re taking a look at this,” one of the people said, adding that the inquiry was in its earliest stages. It was reported Monday night by WCBS-TV News. Go read the rest for more. And as she also noted, they won’t go after the banksters on Wall Street, but they’re more than happy to go after those public pensions as well .
Continue reading …Last month, Jeffrey Deitch, director of MOCA’s Geffen Contemporary in Los Angeles, made the contentious decision to whitewash a politically themed mural composed on a wall of the museum by Italian artist Blu. On Monday night, a group of … Related Entries December 22, 2010 David Hockney’s ‘Fresh Flowers’: Techno-Art or iHackery? December 20, 2010 Bitter Memories of War on the Way to Jail
Continue reading …