Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1908)

Sarah Palin is under intense criticism for using the term ‘blood libel’ to defend herself after she was severely criticized after the Giffords shooting. I expected nothing more from her than to make the tragedy all about her, but I didn’t expect it to be so callous. David Brooks did his best to write a column that is completely pointless after the tragedy and Andrew Sullivan took him to the woodshed over it. A major problem for Palin is that she took a serious amount of heat by many people including Gabby Giffords when she released the Target Map back in March. it’s not like the left decided to dredge it up when it had been previously ignored. Even the View’s own conservative Elizabeth Hasslebeck was fuming about. Elisabeth Hasselbeck calls Sarah Palin’s “Target Map” Despicable It would have been negligent of everybody to dismiss Palin’s target map ad after the Arizona shooting and what defines people at critical times is how they respond. David Frum pounced on her after the brief statement she sent out directly after the Arizona shooting: What Palin Needed to Say After Giffords’ Shooting And of course, Palin and her supporters had some justice on their side. Obviously, Palin never intended to summon people to harm Representative Giffords. There was no evidence that the shooter was a Palin follower, and in short order it became evident that he was actuated by a serious mental illness. Whatever you think about Palin’s “don’t retreat, reload” rhetoric, it could not be blamed for this crime. So – argument won? No. Argument lost. — Of course, Palin has yet to give the answer called for by events. Instead, her rapid response operation has focused on pounding home the message that Palin is innocent, that she has been unfairly maligned by hostile critics. Which in this case happened to be a perfectly credible message. And also perfectly inadequate. Palin’s post-shooting message was about Palin, not about Giffords. It was defensive, not inspiring. And it was petty at a moment when Palin had been handed perhaps her last clear chance to show herself presidentially magnanimous. Then Palin took it a step further today and now here are a few responses to her latest gaffe. Clyburn: Palin intellectually unable ‘to understand what’s going on here’ Jonah Goldberg admits that it wasn’t very smart. I should have said this a few days ago, when my friend Glenn Reynolds introduced the term to this debate. But I think that the use of this particular term in this context isn’t ideal. Historically, the term is almost invariably used to describe anti-Semitic myths about how Jews use blood — usually from children — in their rituals. I agree entirely with Glenn’s, and now Palin’s, larger point. But I’m not sure either of them intended to redefine the phrase, or that they should have. Jewish Groups: ‘We Are Deeply Disturbed’ By Palin’s Use Of Anti-Semitic Term ‘Blood Libel,’ She Should Apologize You can always count on a few left wing Villager type writers to do their best and act like idiots. Jonathan Chait wins the award today. Okay, it’s a little over the top for Sarah Palin to accuse her critics of “blood libel.” But she does have a basic point. She had nothing to do with Jared Loughner. He was not an extremist who embraced some radical version of her ideas. And her use of targets to identify districts Republicans were, um, targeting is not exceptional or prone to incite anybody. What’s happening is that Palin has come to represent unhinged grassroots conservatism, and people in the media immediately (and incorrectly) associated Loughner with the far right. Moreover, the Republican establishment understands her potential candidacy as a liability and is looking to snuff it out. So you have this weird moment where Palin is on trial for something she has no connection with at all. Earth to Chait: Arizona is a hotbed of right-wing unrest and has been for a long time. Guns are being flaunted openly at political rallies and Palin singled out Giffords in the Target Map ad. In what bubble does Chait live? Are we blaming Palin for the shooting? No. We’re making it very clear that words do matter and to think Palin has no connection to the unseemly level of discourse is simply naive. Playing the victim is what conservative pundits and politicians do best, and Palin fits in perfectly with their embrace of victimhood and backlash politics. Wake up.

Continue reading …

While journalists such as Brian Williams railed about “extortion” when CBS pulled a historically inaccurate 2003 miniseries about Ronald Reagan, there has been very little outcry over the news that the History Channel has withdrawn a (reportedly) hard-hitting drama about the Kennedys. The Hollywood Reporter on Sunday explained the behind the scenes role Caroline Kennedy and Maria Shriver played in

Continue reading …
Twitter Fights the Man

When the Justice Department hit Twitter with a court order demanding the private data of certain users associated with WikiLeaks, the g-men might have expected that the social networking site would wilt like the half-dozen easily bullied companies that have cut off the whistle-blower, but Twitter, in the words of Wired’s Ryan Singel , “beta-tested a spine.” Not only did the government want this data, but it wanted Twitter to keep quiet about handing it over. To that end, Justice secured a gag order. Twitter fought the gag order in order to inform those users under investigation and give them a chance to organize a defense. Twitter has been integral to WikiLeaks’ attempts to stay afloat in the face of relentless attacks on its servers, finances and personnel. It is also a private company, and those tend to react rather cowardly to government pressure. Behold, Amazon, PayPal, Facebook, Mastercard, Visa and Bank of America. Surely the United States government would claim vital interests in its pursuit of Twitter data, but so, too, would the government of Iran. Let us not forget how Twitter enabled protesters in that country to resist their government. For the most part private corporations own the means of communication, and the only avenues for resistance and free expression. It is nice to see one consider the interests of its users, for a change.

Continue reading …
‘Daily Show’: Jim Gets a Promotion in the New ‘Huck Finn’

Once we start taking offensive yet instructive language such as nigger out of literature, as is the case with Mark Twain’s “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” what’s next? Senior Black Correspondent Larry Wilmore peers unflinchingly into … Related Entries January 11, 2011 How Many Bullets Do You Need? January 11, 2011 A Tale of Two Sheriffs

Continue reading …
Russia Points to Pilot Error in Polish President’s Crash

Last April’s plane crash in Smolensk, Russia, which claimed the lives of Polish President Lech Kaczynski and 95 other passengers, was due to error on the part of the Tu-154’s Polish pilots—or so say Russian investigators, drawing mixed reactions from the Polish side.

Continue reading …
I Blame Jared Lee Loughner

The man who should burn for the crimes of Jared Lee Loughner is Jared Lee Loughner. Not Rush Limbaugh, who said yesterday that Democrats are supporting the man who shot a Democratic congresswoman in the head: “What Mr. Loughner knows is that he has the full support of a major political party in this country. He’s sitting there in jail. He knows what’s going on, he knows that… the Democrat party is attempting to find anybody but him to blame . He knows if he plays his cards right, he’s just a victim. He’s the latest in a never-ending parade of victims brought about by the unfairness of America …this guy clearly understands he’s getting all the attention and he understands he’s got a political party doing everything it can , plus a local sheriff doing everything that they can to make sure he’s not convicted of murder – but something lesser.” Methinks the demagogue doth protest too much. Indeed, I was impressed by the rapid reaction of tea party mouthpieces and conservative talking heads to Saturday morning’s shooting, as well as the constant refrain of victimhood by the right — as if the whole world is painting the blood on their innocent hands. Sales of the gun Loughner used have skyrocketed ; “get one while you still can” is not just a tagline on gun show billboards, it’s literally a call to arms in anticipation of a crackdown on freedom. Democrats, who will probably not see any real gun control legislation out of the tragedy, have nonetheless been accused of exploiting it since about midday Saturday. In practice, of course, the president has made no attempt to round up Glocks and no one has offered First Amendment-killing legislation aimed at the tea party, but why let facts get in the way of paranoid belief-systems? Besides, the whole point of culture wars is that they be continuous, not that they have any basis in fact. In the paranoid universe, it’s okay if Emanuel Goldstein isn’t real. I know, I know. Markos reacted almost immediately to the shooting by tweeting Sarah Palin about a “mission accomplished,” unfairly blaming Sarah Palin. But she’s not responsible for Loughner’s trigger-happy atrocity. Those target crosshairs surveyor’s symbols weren’t to blame, either, just as the birther-racist asshat-apocalypse nut coalition that turned out for Palin’s 2008 rallies and became the 2009 tea party does not mean Palin is responsible for the tea party’s existence. Like the rest of us, Loughner was swimming in a tide of tea for at least the last two years while his evident paranoia grew. Indeed, the tea party began as a libertarian Ron Paul phenomenon into which K-Street poured gobs of cash, and Loughner is evidently anarcho-libertarian . Our just-ended cycle saw the fringe come mainstream; Loughner is a fringe character responding to his times, but he pulled the trigger on his own, planned the attack ahead of time, and knew exactly what he was doing. He will burn for it according to Arizona law, and I doubt the state will settle for lesser charges. No one — not Palin, not Limbaugh, not Beck — can or should share the dock with him. They did not pull the trigger, after all, much as they didn’t directly cause the seventeen incidents of right-wing violence since Obama’s election . The bikers who intimidated Democratic staffers at Allen West’s rallies and the Rand Paul campaign donor who stomped on Lauren Valle’s head were not taking orders from their candidates, either. As far as legal responsibility goes, Rush is blameless — and knows it. He’s defending something else: his conspiracy theory is a rationalization for listeners to excuse the violence he instills in their minds. Remember, this is the same political movement that said comic books caused crime, insisted backwards lyrics and role-playing games caused murder-suicide, and still worries that reading a Qur’an makes you into a suicide bomber. They admit no connection between their rhetoric and the permissive atmosphere of paranoid, armed reaction they created with their own words. The party of responsibility is denying responsibility not for Loughner, but for their own words , as if words suddenly have no effect on people. When we struggle to say what’s on our minds, we’re at the beginning of language. Thought precedes word or deed, and word usually precedes deed. Words have power; repeated often enough, they become real on their own. In fact, Limbaugh’s entire career has consisted of torturing words until they have only the meaning he wants for them — witness his regular mistreatment of the word “liberal,” for instance. Which brings me to Roger Ailes : I told all of our guys, shut up, tone it down, make your argument intellectually. You don’t have to do it with bombast . I hope the other side does that. If only the leading lights of the right had heard such sage advice two years ago! But then, they have so little intellectual credibility anymore. Why else would so much right-wing communication have turned to the desperate language of last stands, hate, and militant confrontation? Bombast is all they have left. There will be more Jared Lee Loughners because they cannot help themselves. Their industry exists to pollute the airwaves with cancerous lies; I hold them responsible for Loughner’s lymphoma, not his trigger finger.

Continue reading …
What Is the Meaning of This ‘Blood Libel’?

Wouldn’t you know it—the Sarah Palin Catchphrase Generator clicked, whirred and spat out another viscerally tinged and menacing two-word combination to righteously apply to her political opponents. This week’s winner: “blood libel.” But what does it mean ? The BBC breaks it down, and, in news that shouldn’t surprise many, the term comes equipped with loaded religious undertones and the capacity to divide and offend.

Continue reading …

Gosh, who could have predicted that the Tucson shootings would revive the gun control debate yet again? Instead of paying attention to the frustrating cuts to mental health services in Arizona and elsewhere, we have the Villagers all focused on guns and gun control. Conventional Village wisdom goes like this: In situations where a bad guy has a gun and is shooting everyone in sight, a good guy with a gun will save lives. Not letting good guys carry guns means more people will die at the hands of the bad guy. In the midst of Saturday’s chaotic news reporting, one question on my mind was whether the shooter had been subdued by someone else’s gun, and whether any of those hit in the barrage of bullets had been hit by so-called friendly fire. As events unfolded, it seemed as though only one weapon had been fired — the 9mm Glock in the hands of Jared Lee Loughner. But Arizona is an open carry state. It’s not unusual at all for citizens to be carrying their guns, even to the supermarket. So what happened? Why wasn’t there a hero with a gun ready to shoot Loughner down before he trained his Glock on that nine-year old child, or that Federal judge, or the nice little elderly man waiting to chat with her? It turns out there was . Only this particular hero was smart enough to stop and think for a second or two, which probably saved more lives than were otherwise lost. But before we embrace Zamudio’s brave intervention as proof of the value of being armed, let’s hear the whole story. “I came out of that store, I clicked the safety off, and I was ready,” he explained on Fox and Friends. “I had my hand on my gun. I had it in my jacket pocket here. And I came around the corner like this.” Zamudio demonstrated how his shooting hand was wrapped around the weapon, poised to draw and fire. As he rounded the corner, he saw a man holding a gun. “And that’s who I at first thought was the shooter,” Zamudio recalled. “I told him to ‘Drop it, drop it!’ ” But the man with the gun wasn’t the shooter. He had wrested the gun away from the shooter. “Had you shot that guy, it would have been a big, fat mess,” the interviewer pointed out. If you compare Zamudio’s story to Bill Badger’s account (video at the top) as told to Lawrence O’Donnell last night, a picture emerges. Had Zamudio not been careful, there might have been another fatality, or six. At about the 5:36 mark in the video, Badger says that after Loughner went down, the gun left his hand and someone else picked it up. Badger yelled for him to drop the gun, fearing that the police might shoot him, thinking he was the shooter. Or a well-intentioned citizen like Zamudio. This idea that good guys carrying guns will somehow make us safer from bad guys carrying guns is straight out of the NRA talking points, but it doesn’t bear any relationship to reality. At a recent school board meeting in Florida , a deranged person yanked out a gun and held everyone hostage for a time. One brave woman tried to knock the gun out of his hand with her purse. She’s lucky to be alive today, but that purse was likely as effective a weapon as someone in that room with a gun would have been. Ultimately, the shooter turned the gun on himself. No well-intentioned citizen with a gun ended that standoff. And then there’s the dilemma that Zamudio ultimately faced when confronted with the prospect of using his own gun: The Arizona Daily Star, based on its interview with Zamudio, adds two details to the story. First, upon seeing the man with the gun, Zamudio “grabbed his arm and shoved him into a wall” before realizing he wasn’t the shooter. And second, one reason why Zamudio didn’t pull out his own weapon was that “he didn’t want to be confused as a second gunman.” Here’s the truth: Had Zamudio used his gun, there’s every indication the tragedy would have been compounded, not averted. Isn’t it time to lay this canard to rest?

Continue reading …
‘Blood libel’? Sarah Palin claims she’s being persecuted

Click here to view this media YouTube version Sarah Palin says she’s the victim of ” blood libel ” in the Arizona shootings. As one person put it on twitter , “Really? “Blood Libel”? Someone tries to assassinate a Jewish member of Congress, and you use the phrase “Blood Libel”? Shame on you”. Howard Kurtz, who only a few days ago was defending her actions, now condemns her . “Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding,” Palin said in a video on her Facebook page, “journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible.” Blood libel , for those who are not familiar, describes a false accusation that minorities—usually Jews—murder children to use their blood in religious rituals, and has been a historical theme in the persecution of the Jewish people. Had Palin scoured a thesaurus, she could not have come up with a more inflammatory phrase

Continue reading …

It takes a pretty sick mind to come up with the many things that Limbaugh has been spewing over the years, but this one could be his “David” moment. Jed Lewison: You’d have to be on some pretty strong drugs to believe this rant from Rush Limbaugh: What Mr. Loughner knows is that he has the full support of a major political party in this country. He’s sitting there in jail. He knows what’s going on, he knows that…the Democrat party is attempting to find anybody but him to blame. He knows if he plays his cards right, he’s just a victim. He’s the latest in a never-ending parade of victims brought about by the unfairness of America…this guy clearly understands he’s getting all the attention and he understands he’s got a political party doing everything it can, plus a local sheriff doing everything that they can to make sure he’s not convicted of murder – but something lesser. As Steve Benen points out , it’ll be interesting to see if any Republican out there is finally willing to repudiate this nonsense. My pal Benen better use scuba diving equipment if he plans to wait for Republicans to repudiate RushBo. How has that turned out before? Pretty soon Limbaugh will be saying that Pelosi bought the Glock and Reid picked up the ammo.

Continue reading …