enlarge Credit: amazon.com I read Joe McGinniss’ The Rogue : Searching for the Real Sarah Palin . I read the whole thing. Cover to cover. It was not sensational. It was not tabloid-esque. It was not trash. It was what the cover claimed – the search for the real Sarah Palin. She has this thing with telling the truth – she doesn’t do it. Nearly ever. She just, as she says about others “makes stuff up.” This personality trait has been documented over and over again in the press. Perhaps this is why Palin reflexively attacks – not the message or the messenger – but the entire medium and whole idea of journalism and mass communication…often on national television. So it’s a legitimate question: who is this woman? Thanks to a sadistic editor from The Atlantic (she’ll say I volunteered, which is exactly what a sadist would say), I watched the entire two-hour misnomer Palin infomercial, The Undefeated at RightOnline this year . That was not the real Sarah Palin. That was 120-minutes of dog whistles and patriotic stock footage which tens of people ending up paying to see in the theater. I don’t understand the immediate dismissal of McGinniss’ book by the left. It’s weird. Keith Olbermann decided to side with Palin’s opinion of the tome on Real Time with Bill Maher on Friday. “But most of the stuff in there, why is it relevant, what’s the point of it, and how well-sourced is it?” asked the host of Countdown . First off: anonymous sources, while they may not be the most optimal way to write a book, are very common. Journalists often “protect their sources,” some have even gone to jail for it. And for someone who’s as vengeful and vindictive as Sarah Palin, it’s more than understandable people wouldn’t want their names used. Alaska is a small state (as far as people go). Also, the entire book is not anonymous. Plenty of people risked the wrath of Sarah to dish about her to McGinniss. The filmmaker of Sarah Palin – You Betcha , Nick Broomfield, came across the same fear of retribution if anyone they interviewed said anything negative about the Palins. So asking how well-sourced a book about a bully is, candidly, siding with the bully. The only new and notable thing in Rogue was Sarah hooking up with Glen Rice when she was in college and a short anecdote about her doing cocaine. Two things that make her seem much more appealing and credible than anything she’s ever said publicly or had ghostwritten about herself. Everything else in the book is corroborated by other reports, witnesses and sources. There are plenty of people who have said she’s not really into mothering. The book Game Change talked about her temper and her odd dietary choices (caffeine and little food). She’s not an intellectual, as evidenced by…EVERYTHING that’s ever tumbled out of her mouth. McGinniss’ book mentions her reading People magazine. It answers the question: “What do you read?” with the real answer, “Nothing.” She also billed the state for staying in her own home, was taken to task for abuse of power and lying etc. These are not new revelations. The book does illustrate how she rose to fame. It demystifies why Sarah does the things she does (spoiler alert: she’s a narcissist). I compiled the list of Sarah Palin’s media feuds, mostly because it’s hilarious . What I’ve observed about her is she never takes the proverbial high road. So of course she’s threatening to sue McGinniss’ publisher. The greatest defense against slander is the truth. And truth is something Palin has feuded with more than anything else. The Rogue paints a more complete picture of Sarah than has been written before. It’s a quick read. It’s also a sincere love letter to the state of Alaska. There are things that are interesting if we needed to find something politically damaging to her (we don’t). For example, she raised taxes when she was mayor of Wasilla. Sales taxes even. She signed off on a half cent sales tax increase to pay for a stadium in Wasilla. I talked to a colleague of one of the lawyers who vetted Palin for the ’08 election (check out that unnamed source) and he said Palin was brought on because she was thought to be a moderate. She had worked with both Republican and Democrats in her state and in her city to get things done. And then she became the campaign Kraken with a quarter million dollar wardrobe accusing her “enemy” of pallin’ around with terrorists. What’s interesting about Joe’s book is that he really illustrates just how much of a mirage Palin has been to her supporters. Her perfect appearance on the horizon is diminished with each step closer to her. Which is why Republicans are not clamoring for her to run for president. The right can no longer dismiss all criticism of Palin as just liberals who hate her for not aborting her Down Syndrome child. No, now the right suspects she’s incompetent too. They now agree with us. As they say in the south, she ain’t right. And instead of being a divisive figure – she’s bringing left, right and in betweens together in their mutual disdain for her. Poetic. The Rogue in short tells this truth: Alaskans feel duped. They’re pissed. They’re talking. And Joe was taking notes. His conclusion, what he’s said in the lead up to the book being released is that Palin is a phony. Something Alaskan knew before the rest of the nation had to ever think about pit bulls in lipstick. The hostility to McGinniss’ book from the left, I do not understand. Sorry guys, read the book and not just the NYT review.
Continue reading …“Good Morning America's” George Stephanopoulos on Thursday invited retired Supreme Court Judge John Paul Stevens to bash the audience of a GOP presidential debate. The ABC host repeatedly offered up softballs to the liberal Stevens, asking at one point, “I don't know if you saw it, but there was actually a moment in one of the presidential debates where's the number of executions in Texas was cited and the crowd cheered .” After cutting to a clip from the debate, Stephanopoulos prompted the ex-justice of the nation's highest court to offer a critique on a political party: “What did you think?” The segment also aired on Wednesday's “Nightline.” [See video below. MP3 audio here .] Stevens appeared to promote his just-released memoir, Five Chiefs . On the subject of the death penalty and judicial philosophy, Stephanopoulos uncritically wondered, “How did you evolve?” He continued, “It seems like there may be another evolution now in the country that the case of Troy Davis, executed last week.
Continue reading …“If Florida moves, it would create chaos. The calendar would be so compressed that the states that are trying to more relevant, that I don’t think it would do any good for them.” — CHAD CONNELLY, South Carolina GOP chairman, on Florida looking to shift up its GOP presidential primary to Jan. 31 (via CNN)
Continue reading …Trio of five-star London hotels sold to owners of Daily Telegraph by Nama after property crash hits Dublin syndicate Three of London’s top hotels, including Claridge’s, have been sold to the Barclay brothers, owners of the Daily Telegraph, by the Irish state agency trying to recover billions of euros of bad property debt. The Channel Isles-based brothers acquired Maybourne Group, which also owns the Connaught and Berkeley hotels, by buying £700m of loans originally taken out by a syndicate of Irish property developers. The deal reinforces David and Frederick Barclay’s position as the owners of some of Britain’s finest hotels. The brothers already own the Ritz in Piccadilly, central London. It is the largest property sale by the Irish National Asset Management Agency (Nama) since it was set up to deal with the debt amassed by developers during the property boom. The five-star hotels had been bought by a syndicate that included Derek Quinlan, a former tax inspector, and Paddy McKillen in 2005 in one of the most audacious deals by Irish entrepreneurs riding on a wave of cheap credit. The syndicate was then hit by Ireland’s property crash. The agency said on Thursday it has recovered every penny of debt from the Claridge’s deal. “The loans were sold for in excess of €800m with Nama recovering 100% of the original value of the loans plus interest,” it stated. The deal marks a succesful start to a fire sale by Nama of London property within its control, announced earlier this year, including the Citigroup tower in Canary Wharf, part of Leicester Square and the Louis Vuitton building in Bond Street. With Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds, Nama is one of the top property lenders in the UK with a loan book of €30bn (£26bn). With the Irish property market still in the doldrums, Nama is concentrating on the UK to get a return for the Irish taxpayer by 2013. It is hoping to cash in on the commercial property bubble in London which is seen as a safe haven by investors fleeing exceptionally volatile stock, bond and currency markets. Last month it published a list of 850 distressed properties up for sale both in Ireland and the UK – including pubs across Britain, a string of hotels including the Crowne Plaza in Shoreditch, London and, at the bottom end, a car park in Bangor in north Wales and an off licence in Muswell Hill, London. Quinlan and McKillen funded the purchase of the three landmark London hotels through loans from Allied Irish Banks and Anglo Irish Bank, both since nationalised. Quinlan has had a spectacular fall in Ireland’s property crash and has been trying to offload the Citigroup tower which he bought with property investor Glenn Maud. The 42-storey tower at 25 Canada Square was bought from Royal Bank of Scotland in 2007 for £1.1bn and Nama had been close to concluding a sale. It was withdrawn from the market last week after hitting a snag related to a recent legal ruling affecting rental payments. Speaking in Dublin on Thursday, chief executive Brendan McDonagh said loan sales would form a major part of Nama’s strategy. He was open to selling loans relating to “individual assets, whole debtor connections or groups of loans by geography.” The agency is choosing advisers in Europe and the US to assist in property sales. Nama has acquired approximately €600m in loans linked to assets in the US and €30bn of loans linked to assets in the UK and Europe. Ireland Commercial property Real estate London Hotels Barclay Brothers Europe Lisa O’Carroll guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Belo Monte hydroelectric dam project halted after ruling that it risked damaging fish stocks on Xingu river A Brazilian judge has ordered construction to be suspended on a controversial hydroelectric dam in the Amazon. In his ruling, Judge Carlos Castro Martins said that all working on the Belo Monte dam that interfered with the natural course of the Xingu river should be halted because of the risk that fish stocks would be damaged. The £7bn dam would reputedly be the third largest in the world, after China’s Three Gorges and the Itaipu project on the Brazil-Paraguay border. The injunction is the latest development in a decades-long battle against the Belo Monte dam, plans for which were originally conceived in the mid-1970s but subsequently shelved after major protests. Brazil’s government argues that the dam is essential to the energy needs of the country’s booming economy. A full environmental licence for the construction was issued in June, with federal authorities promising a series of initiatives to lessen the social and environmental impact of the dam . But on Tuesday, activists from the anti-dam Xingu Para Sempre movement claimed the project had brought “unprecedented chaos” to the riverside town of Altamira, with thousands of impoverished migrants having arrived by boat or road in search of work. “Nothing good is coming to the region and all of our darkest prophesies are coming true,” Antonia Melo, one of the movement’s leaders, said. Earlier this week, politicians from Altamira’s townhall filed papers with the regional public prosecutor, asking for work on the dam to be interrupted. “The former president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, publicly promised … that the project would bring major benefits to Altamira and 10 other towns around this mega-project,” the document said. “But what we have so far seen are painful frustrations such as increased poverty, insecurity and social chaos.” On Wednesday the judge issued his ruling to suspend building work. While there has long been widespread opposition to the dam from environmentalists, social activists and even Hollywood figures such as the director James Cameron, Altamira’s political leaders have been broadly supportive of Belo Monte in the past, arguing it could bring development to the region. Norte Energia, the consortium behind Belo Monte’s construction, is expected to appeal the decision. Wave, tidal and hydropower Brazil Energy Renewable energy Amazon rainforest Forests Deforestation Rivers Fishing Food Wildlife Conservation Animals Marine life Tom Phillips guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Belo Monte hydroelectric dam project halted after ruling that it risked damaging fish stocks on Xingu river A Brazilian judge has ordered construction to be suspended on a controversial hydroelectric dam in the Amazon. In his ruling, Judge Carlos Castro Martins said that all working on the Belo Monte dam that interfered with the natural course of the Xingu river should be halted because of the risk that fish stocks would be damaged. The £7bn dam would reputedly be the third largest in the world, after China’s Three Gorges and the Itaipu project on the Brazil-Paraguay border. The injunction is the latest development in a decades-long battle against the Belo Monte dam, plans for which were originally conceived in the mid-1970s but subsequently shelved after major protests. Brazil’s government argues that the dam is essential to the energy needs of the country’s booming economy. A full environmental licence for the construction was issued in June, with federal authorities promising a series of initiatives to lessen the social and environmental impact of the dam . But on Tuesday, activists from the anti-dam Xingu Para Sempre movement claimed the project had brought “unprecedented chaos” to the riverside town of Altamira, with thousands of impoverished migrants having arrived by boat or road in search of work. “Nothing good is coming to the region and all of our darkest prophesies are coming true,” Antonia Melo, one of the movement’s leaders, said. Earlier this week, politicians from Altamira’s townhall filed papers with the regional public prosecutor, asking for work on the dam to be interrupted. “The former president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, publicly promised … that the project would bring major benefits to Altamira and 10 other towns around this mega-project,” the document said. “But what we have so far seen are painful frustrations such as increased poverty, insecurity and social chaos.” On Wednesday the judge issued his ruling to suspend building work. While there has long been widespread opposition to the dam from environmentalists, social activists and even Hollywood figures such as the director James Cameron, Altamira’s political leaders have been broadly supportive of Belo Monte in the past, arguing it could bring development to the region. Norte Energia, the consortium behind Belo Monte’s construction, is expected to appeal the decision. Wave, tidal and hydropower Brazil Energy Renewable energy Amazon rainforest Forests Deforestation Rivers Fishing Food Wildlife Conservation Animals Marine life Tom Phillips guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Obesity and poor health conditions, not including stress, costs 103m work days or £21.5bn a year, says new 25-year study Eight in 10 British workers are overweight or living with long-term illnesses that limit their productivity, according to early findings of a 25-year study of people’s wellbeing. Poor health and obesity is costing the economy at least £21.5bn a year and will prove a severe drag on any recovery from the recession, the study suggests. Workers who are both overweight and have three or more health conditions – more than one in 10 of the total – are taking more than three weeks’ sick leave every year. The findings come ahead of publication due in October of an independent review of sickness absence, commissioned by the government. That review is expected to warn that growing numbers of workers are living with long-term conditions and need greater support to do so. According to the wellbeing study, based on an initial telephone interviews with almost 4,000 full-time workers, only 20% are not overweight and have no health conditions, ranging from high blood pressure to cancer. Another 20% have a weight problem but no health conditions. But six in 10 have at least one condition and 16%, almost one in six, have three or more. The study, by pollsters Gallup, is a 25-year collaboration with Healthways, an international wellbeing consultancy, in the UK, Germany and the US. Surveys in Britain began earlier this year and have so far involved almost 9,000 people in and out of employment. Dan Witters, Gallup principal and research director of the study, said: “Only one five British full-time workers are in optimal health. Because of this, they miss an estimated 103m days at work a year.” Ben Leedle, Healthways president and chief executive, said: “The implication of the chronic disease burden of the UK’s workforce is at alarming levels.” Gallup says the findings are a conservative estimate of productivity loss because they do not include part-time workers and take no account of “presenteeism” – people turning up to work when they are ill. Conditions counted in the survey include recurring back or knee pain as well as diagnosed depression. However, they do not include stress or anxiety, which are among the fastest growing causes of sickness absence. The international study has found that while obesity and most health conditions are more common in the US, Britain has the highest rate of asthma and a rate of depression 50% higher than in Germany. Health Obesity High blood pressure Work & careers Recession Cancer David Brindle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Obesity and poor health conditions, not including stress, costs 103m work days or £21.5bn a year, says new 25-year study Eight in 10 British workers are overweight or living with long-term illnesses that limit their productivity, according to early findings of a 25-year study of people’s wellbeing. Poor health and obesity is costing the economy at least £21.5bn a year and will prove a severe drag on any recovery from the recession, the study suggests. Workers who are both overweight and have three or more health conditions – more than one in 10 of the total – are taking more than three weeks’ sick leave every year. The findings come ahead of publication due in October of an independent review of sickness absence, commissioned by the government. That review is expected to warn that growing numbers of workers are living with long-term conditions and need greater support to do so. According to the wellbeing study, based on an initial telephone interviews with almost 4,000 full-time workers, only 20% are not overweight and have no health conditions, ranging from high blood pressure to cancer. Another 20% have a weight problem but no health conditions. But six in 10 have at least one condition and 16%, almost one in six, have three or more. The study, by pollsters Gallup, is a 25-year collaboration with Healthways, an international wellbeing consultancy, in the UK, Germany and the US. Surveys in Britain began earlier this year and have so far involved almost 9,000 people in and out of employment. Dan Witters, Gallup principal and research director of the study, said: “Only one five British full-time workers are in optimal health. Because of this, they miss an estimated 103m days at work a year.” Ben Leedle, Healthways president and chief executive, said: “The implication of the chronic disease burden of the UK’s workforce is at alarming levels.” Gallup says the findings are a conservative estimate of productivity loss because they do not include part-time workers and take no account of “presenteeism” – people turning up to work when they are ill. Conditions counted in the survey include recurring back or knee pain as well as diagnosed depression. However, they do not include stress or anxiety, which are among the fastest growing causes of sickness absence. The international study has found that while obesity and most health conditions are more common in the US, Britain has the highest rate of asthma and a rate of depression 50% higher than in Germany. Health Obesity High blood pressure Work & careers Recession Cancer David Brindle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A well-intentioned President Obama tried to transcend partisanship in Washington, but his efforts were derailed by an “express train of bile” – according to CNN's Piers Morgan, on Wednesday. And Americans need ObamaCare because “Baboons take care of themselves better than we do,” ranted Morgan's sharp-spoken guest, comedian Lewis Black. [Video below the break.] “I mean Obama, to be fair to him, when he came in to power, he said look, I'm going to try to change all of this partisan crap that's going on,” sounded Morgan. “What he's found is he can't at the moment. I mean, it's like he's up against this express train of bile.” Black ranted that “our biggest problem is health care. Baboons take care of themselves better than we do in this country.” Morgan then stood up for Obama against his health care critics, saying he “just can't understand” why people despised Obama over his health care plan. “He brought 30 million more Americans into a health care plan who couldn't afford it,” Morgan touted. “And everyone says you suck as a president. I didn't get it.” A transcript of the segment, which aired on September 28 at 9:30 p.m. EDT, is as follows: MORGAN: I mean Obama, to be fair to him, when he came in to power, he said look, I'm going to try to change all of this partisan crap that's going on. I'm going to try and do it a better way. What he's found is he can't at the moment. I mean, it's like he's up against this express train of bile. And he can't get anything done. So he's now having to get angry. Ironically, he's now taking a leaf out of your book. BLACK: No, he finally had to stand up and go, enough is enough. Part of the problem was I think he picked that – the thing that we have – our biggest problem is health care. Baboons take care of themselves better than we do in this country. So by starting with health care, it just, like, everything went into place. MORGAN: I just can't understand why he got so despised for doing that. He brought 30 million more Americans into a health care plan who couldn't afford it. And everyone says you suck as a president. I didn't get it. Why does that make you a bad president? BLACK: Well, because they didn't sit down and talk to the Republicans and do whatever it is that the Republicans think that they wanted. And then – but look at this group. You've got Eric Cantor, you know, who's basically saying, you know, we're not going to give the money, the FEMA money out until we cut money out of the budget. That's – I mean, how nasty a person can you be? And he got – Virginia got hit, he – you know, when they tried to do that to him, he voted against it. Come off it. You know, we've got to be able to speak to each other at some point. I don't understand what – I don't understand what people who are Democrats or Republicans hear.
Continue reading …A well-intentioned President Obama tried to transcend partisanship in Washington, but his efforts were derailed by an “express train of bile” – according to CNN's Piers Morgan, on Wednesday. And Americans need ObamaCare because “Baboons take care of themselves better than we do,” ranted Morgan's sharp-spoken guest, comedian Lewis Black. [Video below the break.] “I mean Obama, to be fair to him, when he came in to power, he said look, I'm going to try to change all of this partisan crap that's going on,” sounded Morgan. “What he's found is he can't at the moment. I mean, it's like he's up against this express train of bile.” Black ranted that “our biggest problem is health care. Baboons take care of themselves better than we do in this country.” Morgan then stood up for Obama against his health care critics, saying he “just can't understand” why people despised Obama over his health care plan. “He brought 30 million more Americans into a health care plan who couldn't afford it,” Morgan touted. “And everyone says you suck as a president. I didn't get it.” A transcript of the segment, which aired on September 28 at 9:30 p.m. EDT, is as follows: MORGAN: I mean Obama, to be fair to him, when he came in to power, he said look, I'm going to try to change all of this partisan crap that's going on. I'm going to try and do it a better way. What he's found is he can't at the moment. I mean, it's like he's up against this express train of bile. And he can't get anything done. So he's now having to get angry. Ironically, he's now taking a leaf out of your book. BLACK: No, he finally had to stand up and go, enough is enough. Part of the problem was I think he picked that – the thing that we have – our biggest problem is health care. Baboons take care of themselves better than we do in this country. So by starting with health care, it just, like, everything went into place. MORGAN: I just can't understand why he got so despised for doing that. He brought 30 million more Americans into a health care plan who couldn't afford it. And everyone says you suck as a president. I didn't get it. Why does that make you a bad president? BLACK: Well, because they didn't sit down and talk to the Republicans and do whatever it is that the Republicans think that they wanted. And then – but look at this group. You've got Eric Cantor, you know, who's basically saying, you know, we're not going to give the money, the FEMA money out until we cut money out of the budget. That's – I mean, how nasty a person can you be? And he got – Virginia got hit, he – you know, when they tried to do that to him, he voted against it. Come off it. You know, we've got to be able to speak to each other at some point. I don't understand what – I don't understand what people who are Democrats or Republicans hear.
Continue reading …