Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 126)
Palestinian leaders renew attack on Tony Blair over Israel

Middle East envoy accused of ‘parroting’ Israeli demands during negotiations The Palestinian leadership has stepped up its attack on Tony Blair in his role as envoy of the Middle East Quartet, saying that his “parroting” of Israeli demands casts doubt on his credibility. Nabil Shaath, a senior Palestinian official, confirmed that Palestinian leaders had discussed whether to make a formal request to the Quartet that Blair be removed from his position, but had decided against such a move. “Everyone had reservations about Blair’s performance, but we don’t want to embarrass him any more,” Shaath said. “If you want to do it, you wait until things have quietened down.” Hostility towards Blair, who has been the Quartet’s envoy since soon after leaving Downing Street in 2007, has hardened in recent weeks. Blair acted as a “defence attorney” for the Israelis during a debate within the Quartet in July, when its partners – the US, EU, Russia and the UN – were unable to agree on a statement on the outlines of a return to peace talks. This, Shaath said, gave cause for “serious doubt that he could carry on his duties” as a neutral. He described Blair as “a personal friend, a brilliant man, extremely intelligent, with an important record of achievement, at least in his early years”. When he took on the role of Quartet envoy, “we thought he would be a real support to the Palestinians. But he gradually reduced his role to that of asking the Israelis to take down a barrier here or a barrier there… He really escaped all the political requirements of his job as representative of the Quartet.” In fact, Blair’s remit from the Quartet was restricted to easing economic constraints in the West Bank and Gaza and helping with state-building. He was asked to take on the role of political mediator by the US only in the run-up to the Palestinians’ demand for full membership at the UN. “He was parroting exactly what the Israelis wanted,” said Shaath. However the Quartet’s eventual statement “had few flaws, if any”. Its call for restraint on provocative actions was clearly intended to encourage the Israelis to curb settlement expansion, he said. But Israel’s announcement last week of 1,100 new homes in the settlement of Gilo was a rejection of the statement and an indication of its intent to continue its “land grab”, according to Shaath. Tony Blair Palestinian territories Israel Middle East peace talks Middle East United Nations Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian leaders renew attack on Tony Blair over Israel

Middle East envoy accused of ‘parroting’ Israeli demands during negotiations The Palestinian leadership has stepped up its attack on Tony Blair in his role as envoy of the Middle East Quartet, saying that his “parroting” of Israeli demands casts doubt on his credibility. Nabil Shaath, a senior Palestinian official, confirmed that Palestinian leaders had discussed whether to make a formal request to the Quartet that Blair be removed from his position, but had decided against such a move. “Everyone had reservations about Blair’s performance, but we don’t want to embarrass him any more,” Shaath said. “If you want to do it, you wait until things have quietened down.” Hostility towards Blair, who has been the Quartet’s envoy since soon after leaving Downing Street in 2007, has hardened in recent weeks. Blair acted as a “defence attorney” for the Israelis during a debate within the Quartet in July, when its partners – the US, EU, Russia and the UN – were unable to agree on a statement on the outlines of a return to peace talks. This, Shaath said, gave cause for “serious doubt that he could carry on his duties” as a neutral. He described Blair as “a personal friend, a brilliant man, extremely intelligent, with an important record of achievement, at least in his early years”. When he took on the role of Quartet envoy, “we thought he would be a real support to the Palestinians. But he gradually reduced his role to that of asking the Israelis to take down a barrier here or a barrier there… He really escaped all the political requirements of his job as representative of the Quartet.” In fact, Blair’s remit from the Quartet was restricted to easing economic constraints in the West Bank and Gaza and helping with state-building. He was asked to take on the role of political mediator by the US only in the run-up to the Palestinians’ demand for full membership at the UN. “He was parroting exactly what the Israelis wanted,” said Shaath. However the Quartet’s eventual statement “had few flaws, if any”. Its call for restraint on provocative actions was clearly intended to encourage the Israelis to curb settlement expansion, he said. But Israel’s announcement last week of 1,100 new homes in the settlement of Gilo was a rejection of the statement and an indication of its intent to continue its “land grab”, according to Shaath. Tony Blair Palestinian territories Israel Middle East peace talks Middle East United Nations Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian leaders renew attack on Tony Blair over Israel

Middle East envoy accused of ‘parroting’ Israeli demands during negotiations The Palestinian leadership has stepped up its attack on Tony Blair in his role as envoy of the Middle East Quartet, saying that his “parroting” of Israeli demands casts doubt on his credibility. Nabil Shaath, a senior Palestinian official, confirmed that Palestinian leaders had discussed whether to make a formal request to the Quartet that Blair be removed from his position, but had decided against such a move. “Everyone had reservations about Blair’s performance, but we don’t want to embarrass him any more,” Shaath said. “If you want to do it, you wait until things have quietened down.” Hostility towards Blair, who has been the Quartet’s envoy since soon after leaving Downing Street in 2007, has hardened in recent weeks. Blair acted as a “defence attorney” for the Israelis during a debate within the Quartet in July, when its partners – the US, EU, Russia and the UN – were unable to agree on a statement on the outlines of a return to peace talks. This, Shaath said, gave cause for “serious doubt that he could carry on his duties” as a neutral. He described Blair as “a personal friend, a brilliant man, extremely intelligent, with an important record of achievement, at least in his early years”. When he took on the role of Quartet envoy, “we thought he would be a real support to the Palestinians. But he gradually reduced his role to that of asking the Israelis to take down a barrier here or a barrier there… He really escaped all the political requirements of his job as representative of the Quartet.” In fact, Blair’s remit from the Quartet was restricted to easing economic constraints in the West Bank and Gaza and helping with state-building. He was asked to take on the role of political mediator by the US only in the run-up to the Palestinians’ demand for full membership at the UN. “He was parroting exactly what the Israelis wanted,” said Shaath. However the Quartet’s eventual statement “had few flaws, if any”. Its call for restraint on provocative actions was clearly intended to encourage the Israelis to curb settlement expansion, he said. But Israel’s announcement last week of 1,100 new homes in the settlement of Gilo was a rejection of the statement and an indication of its intent to continue its “land grab”, according to Shaath. Tony Blair Palestinian territories Israel Middle East peace talks Middle East United Nations Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian leaders renew attack on Tony Blair over Israel

Middle East envoy accused of ‘parroting’ Israeli demands during negotiations The Palestinian leadership has stepped up its attack on Tony Blair in his role as envoy of the Middle East Quartet, saying that his “parroting” of Israeli demands casts doubt on his credibility. Nabil Shaath, a senior Palestinian official, confirmed that Palestinian leaders had discussed whether to make a formal request to the Quartet that Blair be removed from his position, but had decided against such a move. “Everyone had reservations about Blair’s performance, but we don’t want to embarrass him any more,” Shaath said. “If you want to do it, you wait until things have quietened down.” Hostility towards Blair, who has been the Quartet’s envoy since soon after leaving Downing Street in 2007, has hardened in recent weeks. Blair acted as a “defence attorney” for the Israelis during a debate within the Quartet in July, when its partners – the US, EU, Russia and the UN – were unable to agree on a statement on the outlines of a return to peace talks. This, Shaath said, gave cause for “serious doubt that he could carry on his duties” as a neutral. He described Blair as “a personal friend, a brilliant man, extremely intelligent, with an important record of achievement, at least in his early years”. When he took on the role of Quartet envoy, “we thought he would be a real support to the Palestinians. But he gradually reduced his role to that of asking the Israelis to take down a barrier here or a barrier there… He really escaped all the political requirements of his job as representative of the Quartet.” In fact, Blair’s remit from the Quartet was restricted to easing economic constraints in the West Bank and Gaza and helping with state-building. He was asked to take on the role of political mediator by the US only in the run-up to the Palestinians’ demand for full membership at the UN. “He was parroting exactly what the Israelis wanted,” said Shaath. However the Quartet’s eventual statement “had few flaws, if any”. Its call for restraint on provocative actions was clearly intended to encourage the Israelis to curb settlement expansion, he said. But Israel’s announcement last week of 1,100 new homes in the settlement of Gilo was a rejection of the statement and an indication of its intent to continue its “land grab”, according to Shaath. Tony Blair Palestinian territories Israel Middle East peace talks Middle East United Nations Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Tea party Republican Todd Akin, who refuses to meet with his constituents , has inspired them to take their questions to the web and Twitter with the #AskToddAkin campaign. The website, AskToddAkin.com allows concerned citizens to automatically send tweets that question why the representative opposes programs that help the people of Missouri. The AFL-CIO says: So far, he hasn’t been willing to meet with voters in his district, even though he’s been traveling far and wide to tea party meetings and fundraisers hours outside of his district. When his constituents held a town hall meeting a block from his office, he wouldn’t even contact them to decline, although he did issue a press statement saying he wouldn’t go to a “Union Hall,” calling the town hall meeting a “Rally and Protest.” Among the questions voters can ask Akin: Why he voted to eliminate Medicare? Why he thinks Medicare is unconstitutional? Where are the jobs? Akin has a lifetime Progressive Punch score of 1.13 percent on labor issues, which is skewed by a few positive votes dealing with the erosion of workers’ rights caused by international trade deals. When it comes to other issues, such as giving aid to workers hurt by those trade deals, union rights, occupational safety and health, outsourcing, protection of worker pensions, workplace rights and the rights of public employees, Akin has never voted in favor of America’s workers.

Continue reading …

Tea party Republican Todd Akin, who refuses to meet with his constituents , has inspired them to take their questions to the web and Twitter with the #AskToddAkin campaign. The website, AskToddAkin.com allows concerned citizens to automatically send tweets that question why the representative opposes programs that help the people of Missouri. The AFL-CIO says: So far, he hasn’t been willing to meet with voters in his district, even though he’s been traveling far and wide to tea party meetings and fundraisers hours outside of his district. When his constituents held a town hall meeting a block from his office, he wouldn’t even contact them to decline, although he did issue a press statement saying he wouldn’t go to a “Union Hall,” calling the town hall meeting a “Rally and Protest.” Among the questions voters can ask Akin: Why he voted to eliminate Medicare? Why he thinks Medicare is unconstitutional? Where are the jobs? Akin has a lifetime Progressive Punch score of 1.13 percent on labor issues, which is skewed by a few positive votes dealing with the erosion of workers’ rights caused by international trade deals. When it comes to other issues, such as giving aid to workers hurt by those trade deals, union rights, occupational safety and health, outsourcing, protection of worker pensions, workplace rights and the rights of public employees, Akin has never voted in favor of America’s workers.

Continue reading …
Michael Jackson’s doctor ‘tried to conceal fatal overdose’

Paramedic tells Los Angeles court that physician Conrad Murray claimed star was not on any medication A paramedic who tried to revive Michael Jackson has claimed that the singer’s doctor failed to mention he had given the performer the powerful anaesthetic now known to have killed him. Richard Senneff, delivering the most damning testimony yet to emerge from the trial of Dr Conrad Murray, revealed that the physician told him Jackson “was not taking any medication” and neglected to say he had administered the drug propofol to the singer. Prosecutors cite the omission as evidence that the cardiologist has repeatedly tried to conceal his actions during the desperate struggle to save Jackson. Murray, 58, is charged with involuntary manslaughter. Senneff, the first paramedic to reach Jackson’s bedroom on 25 June 2009, said he found the singer on the floor wearing a surgical cap. Jackson’s skin was turning blue and “cool to the touch” while his eyes were “open and dry”, suggesting he had been dead for some time, even though paramedics had arrived only five minutes after a 911 call stating that a 50-year-old male was suffering a cardiac arrest. Jackson appeared so underweight that Senneff deduced he might be suffering from a chronic illness. Senneff told the court in Los Angeles that Murray was behaving in a frantic manner and that the doctor was evasive when he asked what underlying health condition Jackson had. “He said, ‘Nothing. He has nothing’,” Senneff told jurors. “Simply, that did not add up to me.” That, he added, was the start of several inconsistencies concerning Murray’s responses that emerged during the 42 minutes while Los Angeles paramedics tried to revive Jackson. Murray denies involuntary manslaughter. If convicted he could face up to four years in prison and lose his medical licence. Defence lawyers claim that Jackson gave himself an extra dose of propofol after his doctor left the room. Conrad Murray Michael Jackson United States Mark Townsend guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

The amount of vitriol being spewed at Michelle Obama from the right-wing paparazzi is really getting gross now. The beltway media remains mum about these vicious smears by the wingnutopia and its appalling. Evey step she makes there’s always a John Birch conspiracy theory attached to it by these jackasses. TMZ better move over because did you know the First Lady is really Lady Gaga? Right-wing media have attacked Michelle Obama for going shopping at Target, claiming she went ” ‘incognito,’ Lady Gaga-style” and asking, “Who does she think she’s fooling?” Right-wing media have previously attacked the first lady for everything from promoting health initiatives to wearing a red dress at a state dinner. It’s just getting creepier as the election approaches. Limbaugh: “It Has Gotten So Bad, They Had To Send Moochelle Out There In A Lady Gaga-Type Getup. She Went Shopping At Target.” During the September 30 edition of Premiere Radio Networks’ The Rush Limbaugh Show , Limbaugh said: “It has gotten so bad, they had to send Moochelle out there in a Lady Gaga-type getup. She went shopping at Target.” [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 9/30/11 , via Media Matters ] Malkin: Obama Went To Target “About As ‘Incognito’ As Lady Gaga.” In a September 29 blog post, Michelle Malkin attacked Obama for shopping at Target, writing that Obama was “about as ‘incognito’ as Lady Gaga’s outfit at her younger sister’s graduation.” Malkin went on to call the first lady “the glamour queen” and further stated that Obama’s Target visit was “[t]o counter the negative diva buzz” and that it “[l]ooks like she left the bling at home.” [MichelleMalkin.com, 9/29/11 , via Media Matters ] The Blaze: “What Luck!” Obama “Wasn’t Snapped Without Make-Up, With Messy Hair Wearing Sweatpants To Do Her ‘Everywoman’ Shopping.” A September 30 post on The Blaze stated: Our First Lady has sooome luck. Not only is her hubby the leader of the free world, but just as the Obama camps [sic] is desperately looking for a way to relate to America’s Average Joes, a staff photographer with the Associated Press just so happened to be there to document her recent Target shopping jaunt. What luck! Obama also wasn’t snapped without make-up, with messy hair wearing sweatpants to do her “everywoman” shopping… like some of us who will remain nameless. Exit question: I could see a quick stop in at the local Target store as something that might happen out on the campaign trail. But who really believes Michelle Obama left the White House to pop in at the Alexandria, Va., Target because the East Wing ran out of paper towels? [The Blaze, 9/30/11 , emphasis in original] Weasel Zippers: “Honestly, Who Does She Think She’s Fooling?” A September 29 Weasel Zippers post titled, “Pic of the Day,” stated, “See, Mooch is just like us!” and showed a photograph of the first lady at Target. The post went on to ask, “Honestly, who does she think she’s fooling?” [Weasel Zippers, 9/29/11 ] I guess they’re cranky. It’s the idea of having Mitt Romney running as the 2012 GOP nominee because Chris Christie has continually rebuffed all their slobbering man-crush pleas. Poor right-wingers, they need a nap. Because really, Michelle Obama is in their crosshairs? She has been nothing but a model First Lady. It’s a creative game they have of just making stuff up. I’ll try it: If she disappeared from sight for a few weeks Beck would say that she must be hiding in a cave in Kenya practicing some ancient voodoo mojo to undo Christianity in America so we’ll be more susceptible to becoming Marxistsocialistheavens. Try your own hand teabircher thinking. It’s shockingly easy.

Continue reading …
Maher Cheers Murder of U.S. Citizen Awlaki, Favored Civilian Trial for 9/11 Mastermind KSM

It really has been amazing watching dovish media members who were perpetually complaining about the terrorist detention center at Guantanamo Bay and the enhanced interrogation of its residents when George W. Bush was president now cheering the assassination of United States citizen turned terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki. A fine example of this hypocrisy occurred on HBO's “Real Time” Friday when the host who just last year supported a civilian trial for 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed applauded Awlaki's murder while encouraging his audience to join in the merriment (video follows with transcript and commentary, vulgarity warning): BILL MAHER, HOST: No, I know why you're happy tonight. President bad ass has done it again. A predator drone killed Anwar al-Awlaki. You can applaud that if you like. [Applause] He is Al-Awlaki, is the, well United States citizen is what he is. He was living in Yemen, became the world's most wanted terrorist. And it just shows once again do not f–k with Obama. This was how Friday's show began: a liberal Hollywoodan cheered what many would consider an unConstitutional assassination of a U.S. citizen and encouraged his liberal audience to celebrate with him. It almost defies the imagination. A few minutes later, while discussing national security issues with the Washington Post's Dana Priest, Awlaki came up again: DANA PRIEST, WASHINGTON POST: Bin Laden's dead. Al Qaeda's almost dead. And the guys who really know what they're doing and women they have a bead on the organizations that are coming up. That's al-Awlaki. That's why he got whacked. MAHER: That’s why he got whacked, and I’m glad he did. “That’s why he got whacked, and I’m glad he did.” After dismissing Priest, Maher brought Awlaki up with his exclusively liberal panelists: MAHER: And Chris Christie the other night, the new flavor of the month as they call him, the new man crush of the Republican Party, was at the Reagan library, and he said in his big speech that the president was just a bystander in the Oval Office. And then the next day Obama killed al-Awlaki, which I love. So I just want to say: maybe Obama’s bad at class warfare, but warfare warfare, he's pretty good. FORMER MICHIGAN GOVERNOR JENNIFER GRANHOLM (D): I would say so. [Applause] A few minutes later: MAHER: So were we right to kill al-Awlaki. I mean, look, Ron Paul, who I don’t agree with on a lot of things, but he has the balls the size of a Smart Car. He really does. He came out… SALMAN RUSHDIE, AUTHOR: Not necessarily helpful. MAHER: Maybe not. But, you know, he said we shouldn't do it. He said, his points were this is an American citizen Awlaki, never killed anybody personally. We're not at war with Yemen and he never had a trial. I don't agree with that, but you know… “He never had a trial. I don't agree with that.” Readers are advised to remember this. SETH MACFARLANE, CREATOR “FAMILY GUY: It's a weird gray area because my first instinct when I read this was, “Well, yeah, that makes perfect sense.” There was no feasible way that we could arrest this guy. So what else do you do? If Osama bin Laden would had been an American citizen we still would have had to go in and deal with him as we did. GRANHOLM: Take him out. Take him out.

Continue reading …
Musée d’Orsay’s ‘renaissance’ casts impressionism in spectacular new light

The French museum’s renovation has brought the grandeur of its 19th-century masterpieces back to life The grandeur hits you as soon as you walk in. On the austere, slate-grey wall of the Musée d’Orsay’s newly renovated impressionist gallery, Manet’s Déjeuner sur l’Herbe stops visitors in their tracks. The plump female nude at the heart of the canvas, who so scandalised 19th-century opinion in the Paris Salon, is recognisable, but there is something splendidly different about its new presentation. After Manet, there are the other crown jewels of impressionism: the Degas ballerinas, Monet’s poppies, Renoir’s Moulin Rouge dancers, Cézanne’s card players, and dozens more of the world’s best-known 19th-century French masterpieces. The colours leap out from the long, sombre walls. The museum’s president, Guy Cogéval, had spoken before its reopening of a “renaissance” of the Musée d’Orsay and its world-renowned collection, and promised to show the impressionists as we had never seen them before. The expert judgment, ahead of the public opening of the new-look museum on 20 October, is that he has been true to his word. It has taken almost €8m (£7m) to create this new gallery – part of a two-year renovation of the museum costing €20m – in which clever use of colour and illumination shows the works in an entirely new light. Gone are the cramped corridors, the dead ends, the white stone walls and floors and the glaring light from the massive glass canopy that forms a central avenue over the top-floor gallery in the Pavillon Amont, the west wing of the building. The new, subdued walls and floors, along with artificial lighting, have created what Cogéval describes as an “intimate”, almost homely, atmosphere in a gallery that he says is the “beating heart of the museum”. “These paintings were, after all, intended to be hung on walls in homes, not in a museum,” he says. With his gelled hair, slightly rumpled suit and unbridled enthusiasm, Cogéval, 55, an art historian who took over as president of the Musée d’Orsay in January 2008, has the appearance and air of an over-excited schoolboy. “Everyone said I couldn’t touch the museum when I arrived because it is a historic building and all that. But I have proved them wrong. I said we would do this, and we did,” he says, with undisguised glee. “The whole space has been transformed. It’s magnifique!” The 19th-century painters, working in an era before the electric light bulb became widespread, would doubtless have appreciated the modern tricks of artificial light employed to show their work to extraordinary effect. Developing artistic and scientific techniques to capture on canvas the way that light transformed landscapes and objects became an obsession among the impressionists. The focus was crucial to creating what they termed “optical realism”. Claude Monet said of impressionism, the movement he founded and led: “Light is the principal person in the picture.” To that end, he strove over and over again to encapsulate the way that light danced over the Thames at Westminster, the cathedral at Rouen, the water lilies on the pond at his home in Giverny, and the nearby haystacks – all at different times and in different weathers. Curator Xavier Rey, one of the team hanging the impressionist works in the new fifth-floor gallery, said that before the renovations the paintings had been lit solely by sunlight. “The new system of lighting has transformed everything. Now we have a combination of halogen and new-generation diode lights that reproduce the richness of sunlight, but directly light the paintings and reflect the colours and details. It really does mean the works are being seen in a new light, which was our intention.” He added: “Hanging the works on coloured walls is also closer to the way the impressionist paintings would have been displayed in their time.” As for the impressionists, the devil was in the detail and colour; Parisian architect Jean-Michel Wilmotte said his team had experimented with various shades of grey before coming up with the right one. “It took three or four goes,” said Wilmotte. “The grey paint, which is a specially made mix, changes colour depending on the light – sometimes it is green-grey, sometimes red-grey. It is a very special grey. It doesn’t have a name, but if pushed to give it one I would say gris vivant [living grey] because it changes with the light. The light gives a kind of visual comfort and the painting stands out against this grey. “We also tried to make the best use of the natural light by filtering it and using fractured glass that captures and diffuses the sunlight.” Cogéval admits that he was not convinced at first that profound grey was the right colour for the gallery, having expressed an initial preference for green. “It was this I hesitated over most. We tried it out in a small space like an apartment to see how it looked with different shades and different lighting. Now I see it is warm and elegant,” he said. “The deep colour means the impressionists’ palette can be seen like never before.” Since 2008 the Musée d’Orsay has been gradually abandoning the concept, popularised by the Museum of Modern Art in New York, of hanging paintings on white walls. “Outside 20th-century and contemporary art, white kills all paintings,” said Cogéval. “When you place an academic or impressionist painting on a white background, the light from the white creates an indeterminate halo around the work, preventing the sometimes subtle contrasts and details being revealed.” The opening of the new galleries – including a chain of renovated rooms housing post-impressionist works by Van Gogh, Gauguin, Cross, Seurat, the Douanier Rousseau and a stunning new café designed by Brazilian brothers Humberto and Fernando Campana – will mark the Musée d’Orsay’s 25th birthday. Built on the left bank of the Seine, opposite the Tuileries Gardens, the museum was originally a railway station built by Victor Laloux for the Orléans line and was inaugurated at the World’s Fair of 1900. At the station’s opening, painter Edouard Detaille said presciently: “The station is superb and looks like the Palais des Beaux Arts.” By 1939 it was already obsolete, its platforms too short for the new modern trains that appeared with the electrification of the railways. Today its impressionist and post-impressionist collection boasts 34 Manets, 86 Monets, 43 by Degas, 56 Cézannes, 46 Sisleys, 81 Renoirs, 24 Van Goghs and 24 Gauguins, among others, that help to pull in around three million visitors a year. Architect Dominique Brard, who also worked on the renovation, said it had taken months of long and hard negotiations to be allowed to change parts of the historic building. “It was complicated, very complicated. At times we were negotiating over small points. It took six to eight months of negotiations with the historic monuments people, but we got there in the end,” he told the Observer . “In the end, our role is to show the works of art at their very best, and this is what I believe we have done.” On the way out, one of the museum’s team of curators described how re-hanging the masterpieces had been “extremely exciting and emotional. It was as if we were seeing these paintings for the first time,” she said. “It was extraordinarily moving. We were all blown away.” Art Museums France Paris Europe Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …