Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 124)
Over 500 Protesters Arrested After Being Kettled On Brooklyn Bridge

From the descriptions of the people who were there, it sounds as though Mayor Bloomberg’s strategy is to thin the ranks of protesters with set-ups like this. The Powers That Be don’t understand how many more people are waiting in line to support the Occupy Wall Street actions: Police reopened the Brooklyn Bridge on Saturday evening after more than 500 anti-Wall Street protesters were arrested for blocking traffic lanes and attempting an unauthorized march across the span. The arrests took place when a large group of marchers, participating in a second week of protests by the Occupy Wall Street movement, broke off from others on the bridge’s pedestrian walkway and headed across the Brooklyn-bound lanes. “More than 500 were arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge late this afternoon after multiple warnings by police were given to protesters to stay on the pedestrian walkway, ” a police spokesman said. “Some complied and took the walkway without being arrested. Others locked arms and proceeded on the Brooklyn-bound vehicular roadway and were arrested,” he added. The bridge was reopened at 8:05 p.m. EDT after being closed for hours. Witnesses described a chaotic scene on the famous suspension bridge as a sea of police officers surrounded the protesters using orange mesh netting. Some protesters tried to get away as officers started handcuffing members of the group. Dozens of protesters were seen handcuffed and sitting on the span as three buses were called in to take them away, witnesses and organizers said. The NY Times interviewed protesters who said, despite NYPD claims, the police never warned them they couldn’t walk in the roadway: “The cops watched and did nothing, indeed, seemed to guide us onto the roadway,” said Jesse A. Myerson, a media coordinator for Occupy Wall Street who was in the march but was not arrested. Etan Ben-Ami, 56, a psychotherapist from Brooklyn who was up on the walkway, said that the police seemed to make a conscious decision to allow the protesters to claim the road. “They weren’t pushed back,” he said. “It seemed that they moved at the same time.” Mr. Ben-Ami said he left the walkway and joined the crowd on the road. “It seemed completely permitted,” he said. “There wasn’t a single policeman saying ‘don’t do this’.” He added: “We thought they were escorting us because they wanted us to be safe.” He left the bridge when he saw officers unrolling the nets as they prepared to make arrests. Many others who had been on the roadway were allowed to walk back down to Manhattan. And from a personal email: Just got back from march on bridge. Watched everyone get arrested from above (half the march went over the walkway above the road, other half went on road below). Everyone says there were clear indications from police that marchers could go on the road. Some say cops were even blocking traffic to escort marchers onto the bridge, where they were later trapped. In perhaps unrelated news: JPMorgan Chase recently donated an unprecedented $4.6 million to the New York City Police Foundation. The gift was the largest in the history of the foundation and will enable the New York City Police Department to strengthen security in the Big Apple. The money will pay for 1,000 new patrol car laptops, as well as security monitoring software in the NYPD’s main data center. New York City Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly sent CEO and Chairman Jamie Dimon a note expressing “profound gratitude” for the company’s donation. “These officers put their lives on the line every day to keep us safe,” Dimon said. “We’re incredibly proud to help them build this program and let them know how much we value their hard work.” enlarge

Continue reading …
Bolton v Chelsea | Evan Fanning

• Hit F5 to refresh or turn on the automatic widget below • Email your thoughts to evan.fanning.casual@guardian.co.uk • Follow Evan on Twitter, if that’s your thing • More stats than you can shake a stick at • Follow all today’s live scores across Europe 39 min: Sturridge gets in over the top and for a moment it looks like he’ll be able to secure his hat-trick (provided he can beat Bogdan, but I think we can take that as a given at this stage) but Sturridge can’t quite gather until the angle is too tight but which time Bolton have several men back. Ryan Dunne enters the history debate: “Personally I don’t think that 1997 is all that long ago, but it surely depends on how old one is (the office junior-y ‘casual’ in Evan’s email address perhaps suggesting a young and thrusting teenager? ;)). Currently I’m debating whether, as an (early) 30-something, it’s ethically permissible to date someone younger than one’s favourite album (Achtung Baby, 1991).” Unfortunately, despite the ‘casual email address, I was at my peak teenage years in 1997 and that seems like a long time ago. I’m staying out of your dating dilemma. 35 min: Chelsea win a corner which infuriates Gary Cahill – he’s going to solve Arsenal’s defensive problems, isn’t he?. Lampard takes and Ramires nearly meets it on the six yard box. It comes off a Bolton head instead and could easily be an own goal but ricochets to safety. 33 min: Bolton look like they want to go home. Martin Petrov may have already done that. Once again Sturridge is an acres of space on the right flank but he loses his footing before he can inflict any more damage on the home side. This is the first time Chelsea have scored four times in the opening 30 minutes of a match in Premier League history. 30 min: Bolton have pushed Kevin Davies up front with David Ngog. That should do it. It seems my Spanish isn’t any better than wot my English is as Shaun Thompson points out. “Can I be one of 1,056 sad, Spanish-language pedants to point out that when you wrote that ‘John Terry has just felt the full force of David Ngog’s boot in the cajones’, you surely meant to type ‘cojones’. Cajon is ‘drawer’ as in somewhere to put that offensively-worded Christmas card from Wayne Bridge.” Goal! Bolton 0-4 Chelsea (Lampard 25) This is officially ridiculous now. David Luiz marched 50 yards upfield – Bolton electing not to bother trying to tackle the centre back – he fired goalwards. Again it should have been a simple save by Bogdan but it bounced off his chest into the path of the onrushing Lampard who finished neatly. Goal! Bolton 0-3 Chelsea (Sturridge 25) This is getting ridiculous. See entry at 20 minutes for build-up. This time Sturridge cut in from the right and fired a shot which should have been easily saved but Bogdan somehow managed to palm the ball into his own net. 22 min: Kevin Davies comes up with some good work to win a corner on the right. Petrov’s delivery is perfect but Lampard gets the slightest touch which takes it away from Boyata. Petrov scampers to the other side to take another corner which Boyata meets but his header drifts harmlessly wide. Ian Copestake writes: You referred in your preamble to a Bolton win as being “all the way back in 1997.” Now call me age sensitive, but 1997 doesn’t seem that long ago, so I was wondering how you would describe Blink-182 having been formed in 1992? Back in days of yore?” If it only takes a second to score a goal 14 years is a long, long time. 20 min: This might be over-simplifying it a little but Chelsea’s tactic appears to be: kick the football to the right hand side where Martin Petrov isn’t and then Daniel Sturridge has the freedom to do whatever he wants. This time Sturridge finds Juan Mata who blazes a right-footed shot over the crossbar. Petrov shakes his head ruefully. More from Ryan Dunne: ” Isn’t Ashley Cole starting a restaurant with Jay-Z? That suggests that the Chelsea dressing room rocks to the beats of Brooklyn’s finest (perhaps where Ashley got the idea of popping that cap in the work experience boy’s ass from?” 19 min: I might need to put Ryan Dunne in touch with Tom Bryant directly. ” Thanks to Tom Bryant for that!” the Dunnster writes. “Always like Tom the best on the grounds that he was the funniest Boy Band member in the All the Small Things video. I do much prefer Blink 182′s self-titled album to Take Off Your Pants and Jacket, which hopefully bodes well for an appreciation of the new album. And am I the only person alive who thought that Guns n Roses Chinese Democracy was really rather good? It had like a dozen musical genres in each song!” 17 min: This could turn into a rout. Lampard is denied a quick second by Bogdan while moments later Ramires’s touch is heavy when played in by Sturridge and he can’t get his shot on goal. “Being “that guy” I can’t help but marvel at the fact that John Terry has a set of drawers as part of his anatomy,” says that guy Jesse Galdston. “I knew the man was solid and not that fast but I didn’t know he was literally a piece of furniture.” Goal! Bolton 0-2 Chelsea (Lampard 15) It’s beautiful football from Chelsea but it’s far too easy from a defensive point of view. Ramires and Mata are heavily involved before Sturridge squares across the area and Lampard sweeps past Bogdan in the Bolton goal. 13 min: Bolton seem to be pursuing an odd tactic of selective pressing. One minute they’re hounding the Chelsea players’ every move. The next they’re letting David Luiz amble 40 yards upfield before Gary Cahill makes a challenge on the edge of the area. 11 min : Bolton have responded well to going behind and Darren Pratley picks up a loose ball at the edge of the area but is fouled from behind by Meireles who escapes a yellow card. Where is the consistency, eh referees? At least Martin Petrov is consistent – he blasts his free kick into the wall as usual. “David Ngog’s kick to the berries just did what I think half of England has wanted to do EBJT for years,” says Bruce Cooper. 9 min: Gardner makes a break through the Chelsea midfield but good covering defending from David Luiz snuffs out the danger before the Brazilian is dumped on the ground by Ngog who picks up a yellow card. “Does Mr Bryant know what Didier Drogba thinks of Blink-182′s new album?” asks Jon Wilks. “Or is he more of an Usher man (Didier, not Tom)?” 7 min: John Terry has just felt the full force of David Ngog’s boot in the cojones. He’s down on the ground getting treatment. Alan Parry points out that “it’s a female physio as well”. Careful lads. Remember what happened to Gray and Keys? “She’s a lovely girl as well,” Wilkins chips in. As well as what? 5 min: Sturridge’s goal – timed at 92 seconds – is the quickest in the Premier League this season. I told you I’d get a review from Tom Bryant. And I told you he’d met them. “I have indeed met them,” Bryant confirms. “I like Mark the best. He’s normal. Tom’s crazy and Travis is weird. Their new album, should Ryan Dunne like to know, is better than you’d expect from a comeback of this nature – but nothing like as good as their best.” Goal!! Bolton 0-1 Chelsea (Sturridge 1) Bolton have taken one minute to show exactly why they are bottom of the table. Daniel Sturridge is given a free header from six yards from Juan Mata’s corner and makes absolutely no mistake. It’s a simple header for the man who was on loan at the Reebok last season. The corner came after Bosingwa was given acres of space on the right and Boyata was forced to deflect his cross behind. An all-round shambles from a Bolton point of view. Peep!!! We’re underway at the Reebok as Chelsea, all in blue, kick off playing from right-to-left. Bolton, as tradition would dictate, are playing the other way. Ray Wilkins reckons Bolton’s tough start to the season is the reason they are at the foot of the table. “They’ve played everybody,” says Ray. You can’t argue with that. A perceptive email. “I know you’re not in charge of the Guardian’s music section,” writes Ryan Dunne. “But I’ve been browsing and clicking refresh all week and am yet to find a review of the new Blink-182 album! WTF? I’m sure the sports desk are a down-with-da-kidz bunch of lads, so is there no chance of MBMing said album whilst doing the regular fitba commentary?” Having not heard the album I would say there is little chance of that but when my colleague, the aforementioned Mr Bryant, returns from his lunch I will pester him for his opinion. He knows everything there is to know about Blink 182. At a guess I would say he’s even met them. In the Sky Sports studio Gareth Keenan Gary Neville reckons Owen Coyle will be concerned about how easily Bolton have been brushed aside in games this season. Is there a manager more committed to the cause of constantly referring to it as the Barclays Premier League than Owen Coyle? No is the correct answer to that question. Stats can prove anything. My colleague Tom Bryant has tried to convince me that Chelsea have the worst record at Bolton in the history of football or something like that (to be honest I stopped listening halfway through his sentence). Chelsea have won 19 drawn 14 and lost 24 of the previous 57 games keeping 13 clean sheets, he reckons, but I know I’m right. The summer (otherwise known as 1 October) is over. At least it is in Bolton. It’s pouring down. That should suit [insert name here]‘s slick passing game. That should suit [inset name here]‘s tough tackling game. Chelsea always win at Bolton, don’t they? You have to go back to November 2002 for the last time Chelsea travelled to the Reebok and left with anything less than three points, and even then it was a draw. Dean Holdsworth was the goalscorer the last time Bolton beat Chelsea at home in the league all the way back in October 1997. But these are desperate times for Bolton. Rooted to the bottom of the table with just one win all season and 16 goals conceded in six games. Owen Coyle’s side will face a Chelsea side featuring Frank Lampard, Didier Drogba and Daniel Sturridge, who spent six happy months at the Reebok season. Here are the line-ups for today’s game Bolton: Bogdan; Steinsson, Cahill, Boyata, Robinson; Petrov, Pratley, Reo-Coker, Gardner; Ngog, Kevin Davies. Subs: Lainton, Muamba, Eagles, Sanli, Knight, Mark Davies, Vela. Chelsea: Cech; Bosingwa, David Luiz, Terry, Cole; Ramires, Meireles, Lampard; Mata, Drogba, Sturridge. Subs: Turnbull, Ivanovic, Romeu, Mikel, Malouda, Lukaku, Anelka. Referee: Peter Walton (Northamptonshire) Premier League 2011-12 Bolton Wanderers Chelsea Evan Fanning guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Britons warned to avoid Kenya-Somali border

Foreign Office warns against travel to area within about 100 miles of Somali border after spate of kidnappings The Foreign Office has warned British citizens to stay away from all Kenyan beaches within 93 miles (150km) of the border with Somalia after a spate of kidnapping raids by armed pirates in speedboats. The updated travel warning against all but essential travel to the area comes after an elderly disabled French woman became the third foreigner to be attacked by pirates in Kenya’s northern coast in recent weeks. On Saturday, despite a boat chase and shootout with pirates, local coastguards failed to rescue the woman, identified by Kenyan authorities as 66-year-old Marie Dedieu, as her attackers fled with her into Somalia. The FCO had previously warned holidaymakers to stay 37 miles away from the border after British publisher David Tebbutt, 58, was killed and his wife Judith taken hostage as they holidayed at a luxury resort 25 miles from the Kenya-Somalia border on 11 September. In 2010 British couple Paul and Rachel Chandler were snatched from their yacht and held for 13 months. They were released after a ransom was paid . Dedieu’s kidnappers had stormed a seafront property near the island of Lamu after arriving by speedboat in the early hours of Saturday. Neighbours reported shots as the gang burst into the thatched house and rounded up staff before carrying off the woman. Officials chased and surrounded a “suspicious vessel” reportedly heading towards neighbouring Somalia with six to 10 gunmen and the elderly hostage on board. Despite wounding several of the gang, officials admitted that they had failed in their rescue mission. Colonel John Steed, in charge of the UN’s counter-piracy unit in Nairobi, said that as darkness fell it had become impossible to give chase further. “Now it reverts to normal kidnapping negotiations,” he said. John Lepapa, 39, described by local journalists as Didieu’s partner, reportedly said that the kidnappers ordered him and the house staff to lie face-down on the floor. “All they were saying was, ‘Where is the foreigner, where is the foreigner?’” he said. “My girlfriend pleaded with them and told them to take whatever they wanted from the house, including the money, and to spare her life. But they would not listen.” One of the gunmen, he said, grabbed Didieu and carried her on his shoulders to a waiting boat. Kenyan police said they had not established if the assailants were Somali pirates, al-Shabaab Islamists or a local gang. Najib Balala, the tourism minister, said coastguard vessels surrounded the boat and there was a standoff between the Kenyan coastguards and the gunmen. Balala said the gang had fired into the air in an attempt to scare off the coastguard and circling aircraft. In a statement, the FCO said: “We advise against all but essential travel to coastal areas within 150km of the Somali border, following two attacks by armed gangs in small boats against beach resorts in the Lamu area on 11 September and 1 October 2011. “This advice will be kept under review. Both attacks were on beach-front properties, with two westerners kidnapped and one murdered. “Beach-front accommodation in that area and boats off the coast are vulnerable.” Somali pirates have frequently seized crew from merchant ships in the coastal waters off the Horn of Africa, but in recent years have targeted private yachts, snatching westerners and demanding – often successfully – huge ransoms. The Lamu archipelago, famed for its pristine beaches and luxury villas, is often included in package holidays to Kenya – the FCO warning is likely to damage the country’s billion dollar a year tourist industry. France has already strongly advised travellers to avoid the region. Kenya Piracy at sea Somalia Africa France Foreign policy Kim Willsher Shiv Malik guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Former Car Czar: Suskind Book ‘Drive-by Shooting’ Of Obama

“It's important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we're talking with each other in a way that — that heals, not in a way that wounds .” — President Obama, speech at Tuscon memorial service, January 12, 2011. “The [Suskind] book amounts to a drive-by shooting of a president and his key economic advisers who deserve encomiums, not unfounded second guessing and inaccurate revisionist history.” — Former Obama car czar Steve Rattner, writing at the Politico, October 2, 2011 [emphasis added].

Continue reading …
Man arrested over fatal farm fire

A 37-year-old Wakefield man is being questioned in connection with the blaze in which Isobel Dobson, 2, died on Friday A 37-year-old man has been arrested in connection with a fire at a farm which claimed the life of a two-year-old girl. The man is being questioned in connection with the blaze at Hessle Farm, Wragby, near Wakefield, West Yorkshire, in which Isobel Dobson died on Friday evening. West Yorkshire Police said on Sunday that the fire was now being treated as suspicious and inquiries were ongoing to determine the cause. A police spokesman said: “A 37-year-old Wakefield man has now been arrested in connection with the incident and is currently in police custody. “Inquiries into the cause of the fire, which is now being treated as suspicious, are ongoing and a joint investigation is being carried out by West Yorkshire Police and West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service.” Emergency services were called to the blaze at about 5.30pm on Friday and found a van and two barns ablaze on their arrival. Isobel and her one-year-old half-sister were in the van when the fire broke out. Isobel’s 37-year-old stepfather and 22-year-old mother rescued the baby from the vehicle but were beaten back by flames and injured as they tried to unsuccessfully to free the little girl. Her body was found on Friday night and police confirmed she had died. A police spokesman said on Saturday: “Isobel and her one-year-old half-sister were in the van when the fire broke out and, despite efforts by her 37-year-old stepfather and mother, they were only able to rescue the one-year-old girl before being beaten back by the flames and injured.” Police said the man and the baby received treatment for burns at Pinderfields hospital in Wakefield overnight and were later discharged. The spokesman added: “The family have asked the media to respect their privacy at this very difficult time.” The family were at the farm tending to a horse before the fire broke out. Ten fire engines were sent to the scene at the height of the huge blaze and firefighters remained at the farm on Saturday. Police are appealing for any witnesses, or anyone with information that they feel could assist the investigation, to contact the Homicide and Major Inquiry Team via 0845 6060606 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111. Crime guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
David Cameron unveils ‘right to buy’ revamp to help boost UK economy

On opening day of Conservative conference, Cameron sets out package of measures on housing that he says could provide 200,000 homes and create 400,000 jobs David Cameron has outlined plans to boost the “right to buy” council house scheme first introduced under Margaret Thatcher’s government in the 1980s, as part of plans to “fire up” the British economy. The prime minister made the announcement to increase discounts to encourage council tenants to buy their own homes as the Conservatives prepare for the first day of their annual party conference amid Tory rumblings about the government’s growth strategy. “We need to do everything we can to fire up the engine of the British economy,” said Cameron in an interview on The Andrew Marr Show. “There’s a step-change taking place right now,” he said. He also insisted the government was right to do “difficult things” to cut the deficit, before conceding that ministers need to do a better job of explaining to those affected why the spending cuts are necessary. He stressed that the government “isn’t just sitting back” in terms of boosting growth as he laid out a package of measures on housing which he said could together provide 200,000 extra homes, create 400,000 extra jobs and give young people the chance to buy their own homes. The original right-to-buy scheme introduced by the Conservatives in the 1980s was criticised for cutting the social housing stock available to those on low incomes. Under Labour, the discounts were reduced thereby discouraging take- up of the scheme. But Cameron said the money from council house sales would be invested into building affordable homes for those on low incomes, which would also boost jobs in the construction industry. The prime minister also highlighted plans to hand thousands of acres of land to developers to build homes . Construction companies will be allowed to take over sites that have been developed but have fallen into disuse, and will only pay for the land when the properties they have built are sold. Housebuilding fell to its lowest peacetime rate since 1924 under the last Labour government, Cameron said. “The housing market isn’t working. Why isn’t working? Because of the debt crisis, the banks are bunged up with debt, so the banks aren’t lending, the builders aren’t building and the buyers can’t buy because they can’t get the mortgages that they need. “So this government isn’t just sitting back, we are rolling up our sleeves and saying right, we’re going to make over government land to housebuilders on the basis that they can build now and pay for the land when they sell the homes. “That could build 100,000 homes, 200,000 jobs in our economy. We’re not stopping there, we’re saying let’s bring back the right to buy your council house, with proper discounts that Labour got rid of, and let’s use that money, as people choose to buy their council home, let’s use that money to build homes for rent, for low rents for families that are currently stuck on housing lists.” He said there were more than 2m council homes still available for purchase. “This is something that could make a big difference and again that could provide another 100,000 homes, another 200,000 jobs. So taking those two policies together that could provide 200,000 extra homes, 400,000 extra jobs.” But there are concerns about the availability of affordable homes amid moves to scrap strict planning rules compelling housebuilders to include such properties in private development schemes. The National Housing Federation, which represents hosing associations, has warned this could prove a significant setback for affordable housebuilding. The economy is expected to dominate the week as the Conservatives gather for their four-day annual party event. Fellow Tory Andrew Tyrie, who chairs the influential Commons treasury select committee, used the runup to the gathering in Manchester to warn that the government’s economic response was “incoherent and inconsistent”. Cameron defended the government’s policies, saying he was not prepared to put at risk the plan for getting the country’s debt and deficit “under control”. Outlining his growth strategy he said: “Line one is dealing with the deficit, absolutely essential for low interest rates. Line two is do all the things to make it easier for businesses to start up, for businesses to grow and to invest. So we are dealing with the employment regulations, we are cutting corporate tax. We are dealing with things like business rates, we are reforming the planning system. Since the election there were also “half a million more private sector jobs”, he added “so the economy is rebalancing” away from the public sector, he added. Cameron also used the wide-ranging interview to say he agreed with Theresa May, the home secretary, who told the Sunday Telegraph she wanted to see the Human Rights Act scrapped as she expressed her frustration at the way the legislation thwarts Home Office efforts to deport dangerous foreign criminals and terrorist suspects. Her comments pre-empt the outcome of a commission of human rights experts that is currently looking at the possibility of bringing in a British bill of rights to replace the Human Rights Act by the end of next year. Few expect the commission – which will report to deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg and Ken Clarke, the justice secretary – to recommend any serious changes. Cameron shared May’s concern that the Commission would work “more slowly” than the Tories wanted, and said if the Conservatives were in power alone, he would get right of the legislation and replace it with a bill of rights. But he said action was already being taken to help end the “chilling culture” which the act had fostered among people fearful they would fall foul of it. He cited the recent example of a prison van driven nearly 100 miles to transfer a defendant the short walk to a court. “I agree that it would be good to replace the Human Rights Act with a bill of rights. I think that is the right thing to do.” He declined to be drawn on reports of a secret plan being discussed by senior member of the coalition which would see the Tories offering Clegg and other senior Liberal Democrats positions in the cabinet after 2015, even in the event of an outright Conservative victory. Cameron told Marr he was focused on the “here and now” to deliver the government’s agenda and said it was good that Britain had a “strong and stable government” under the coalition. “What happens at the next election – we’ll fight as independent parties. We will be fighting to win. And whatever happens, happens.” Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Conservatives David Cameron Housing Communities Local government Conferences Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Yemen warplane strikes own troops by mistake

At least 30 soldiers killed in evening bombing on abandoned school used as shelter by army’s 119th Brigade A Yemeni warplane has mistakenly bombed its own troops at a military site in the country’s volatile south, killing at least 30 soldiers and wounding many more. Military and medical officials said the Saturday evening bombing in the southern Abyan province targeted an abandoned school used as a shelter by soldiers of the army’s 119th Brigade. “The plane hit a small military site in Abyan. They meant to target an al-Qaida hideout,” a security official told Reuters by telephone from the flashpoint province. A defence ministry source, however, denied “the false news that Yemeni soldiers were killed in an accidental Yemeni plane strike”. Heavy fighting has been raging in the area for days as part of the army’s campaign to seize back the provincial capital Zinjibar from militants. The Yemeni authorities are facing down revolt on multiple fronts amid widespread opposition to the 33-year rule of President Ali Abdullah Saleh. The incident comes two days after a US drone strike killed several al Qaida-linked militants in northern Yemen, including cleric and propagandist Anwar al-Awlaki. Yemen Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Yemen warplane strikes own troops by mistake

At least 30 soldiers killed in evening bombing on abandoned school used as shelter by army’s 119th Brigade A Yemeni warplane has mistakenly bombed its own troops at a military site in the country’s volatile south, killing at least 30 soldiers and wounding many more. Military and medical officials said the Saturday evening bombing in the southern Abyan province targeted an abandoned school used as a shelter by soldiers of the army’s 119th Brigade. “The plane hit a small military site in Abyan. They meant to target an al-Qaida hideout,” a security official told Reuters by telephone from the flashpoint province. A defence ministry source, however, denied “the false news that Yemeni soldiers were killed in an accidental Yemeni plane strike”. Heavy fighting has been raging in the area for days as part of the army’s campaign to seize back the provincial capital Zinjibar from militants. The Yemeni authorities are facing down revolt on multiple fronts amid widespread opposition to the 33-year rule of President Ali Abdullah Saleh. The incident comes two days after a US drone strike killed several al Qaida-linked militants in northern Yemen, including cleric and propagandist Anwar al-Awlaki. Yemen Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Conservative conference 2011: live coverage

Rolling coverage of all the day’s developments in Manchester 10.17am: Here is some Twitter reaction to Cameron’s interview on the Andrew Marr show. From the Daily Express’s Patrick O’Flynn Cam unscathed by #Marr but seemed far too complacent on EU. This will cause him problems here #cpc11 From the Daily Telegraph’s Benedict Brogan Agree With @oflynnexpress: Cam has strong voice, speaks in plain English, carries authority. Ominous for Labour From Gaby Hinsliff, the former Observer political editor Cameron looking more uncomfortable on growth strategy questions than on Europe. this’ll be the Q to watch during #cpc11 From PoliticsHome’s Paul Waugh PM ducking EU treaty change ‘opportunity’ to repatriate powers. Suggests it’s medium term issue, bit garbled answer 9.58am: The snap verdict in the press room at Manchester Central, the conference venue, was that that interview hasn’t really taken us much further forward. Cameron confirmed that he still agrees with what he thought about the Human Rights Act in May 2010. With Theresa May, the home secretary, telling the Sunday Telegraph that she would like the HRA to go (ie, she still thinks what she thought in May 2010 too), this gives us an easy coalition row, because Nick Clegg told the Lib Dem conference: “Let me say something really clear about the Human Rights Act. In fact I’ll do it in words of one syllable: It is here to stay.” But this feels like a choreographed display of posturing, rather than a fresh insight into what the government will do. Unless I missed it, Cameron did not have anything very original to say about the economy. But I thought it was interesting that when Marr tried to tempt him into saying he couldn’t wait to get rid of the Lib Dems after 2015, Cameron refused to take the bait. The Independent on Sunday suggests that, if Cameron wins a narrow majority at the next election, he is planning to offer Lib Dems positions in the cabinet. I’ll post a proper summary shortly 9.55am: Oh, no, it’s not quite over. Marr has a quick chat with PJ Harvey, the musician. She mentions government cuts to the arts. Cameron says the lottery is still providing plenty of money. Now she’s singing about “beautiful England”. Cameron will like that. 9.49am: Marr returns to the economy. Q: Vince Cable says the crisis was like a war. Cameron says there are some similarities. The last coalition was during the war. Q: Some people don’t seem to be affected by the crisis. Cameron says he does not accept that. People are affected, particularly by things like energy prices. He mentions a visit to a hospital yesterday. A patient told him about his sons, all working in industry. He was proud of the fact they were building Britain’s future. Cameron says the government has show people that there is a better future. That’s it. The interview’s over. 9.45am: Marr asks about the state of the coalition. Q: If you had a majority, would you push the Lib Dems out? Cameron says the coalition is working well. Of course there are “tensions and pressures”. At the next election the Conservatives will fight as a separate party. “We will be fighting to win.” Q: What kind of Conservative are you? A Thatcherite? Or a Conservative who enjoys coalition? Cameron says he is a “modern, compassionate Conservative”. He says he does not accept that the government are being held back by the “cuddly Liberal Democrats”. The decision to increase health spending was a Conservative policy. The success of one party does not have to be at the expense of another, he said. Q: Will there be a coalition divorce? We are not married, says Cameron. He jokes that he is married to his wife, not Nick Clegg. At the next election, he wants to win outright. 9.41am: Marr is now asking about planning. Cameron says he loves the countryside. He would no sooner harm the countryside than harm his own family. Q: But will the new planning laws allow signs to go up everywhere, as they do in the US? Cameron says that is not quite right. Under the government’s plans, local communities will get to benefit. Q: Do you accept there will be more homes in rural areas? Cameron says he wants to give local people more control over new homes. Local councillors want more homes to be available. Q: Do you agree that it would be good to get rid of the Human Rights Act? Cameron says he agrees it would be better to replace it with a British Bill of Rights. But the coalition has a policy on this. It has set up a commission to look at that. What it can do is look at the way this is interpreted in the UK. Recently a prison van had to be used in a case where a prisoner could have walked, because people thought human rights were involved. These issues can be addressed. 9.34am: Marr is now asking about the economy. Q: Are you ruling out cutting taxes? Cameron says it is important to stick to the government’s economic plans. But some business taxes have already been cut. Q: And you can’t spend any more money, can you? Cameron says those who argue that spending “a few more billion now” will make a huge difference. The government will be spending £3tn (trillion) over the next few years. Cameron says the government is taking various steps: 1) dealing with the deficit; 2) doing everything possible to make it easier for busineses to expand and invest. Q: Andrew Tyrie says the growth strategy is incoherent. Cameron says exports to China are up 40%. The motor industry is expanding. Q: Do you need to re-engineer the growth strategy? Cameron says the government needs to everything it can to fire up growth. It is. For example, the housing plan announced today could create 200,000 jobs. (See 8.55am.) The government is also bringing back the right to buy, he says. (The BBC has more on that here.) Q: But there aren’t that many council homes left? There are, says Cameron. Some 2m homes are available. 9.32am: They are still talking about Europe. Q: What would you do if there were a treaty renegotiation? Cameron says that is not on the agenda right now. Q: But would you “relish” the chance to renegotiate Britain’s relationship with the EU? Cameron says the priority is to get the economy going. People across the EU are not talking about a treaty negotiation. 9.26am: David Cameron is on the Marr show now. Q: Are you worried that coalition policies are hitting women? Cameron says times are tough for all families. And women are at the heart of families. The government has do to better at explaining what it is doing. Q: How much worse could the economy get? There is a real problem in the Eurozone, Cameron says. The government has been saying the Eurozone countries have to face up to this. It’s “a threat to the worldwide economy”. Q: Do you accept that there has to be a single economic area? The logic of the Eurozone leads in that direction, Cameron says. But the problem is more urgent. Action needs to be taken in the next few weeks. These countries have to get “ahead of the markets” now. Q: What happens to the UK if the Eurozone breaks up? It would be “very bad”, he says. Some 40% of British exports go to the Eurozone. Cameron says he thinks it is in Britain’s interests to be in the EU. But he would like some powers to be repatriated. Q: So will you support a referendum on the EU. [The Mail on Sunday is splashing on the news that there will be a backbench vote on whether or not to have a referendum.] Cameron says he is not in favour of a referendum of that kind. But he does think Britain can have a “better” relationship. Britain has forged alliances with France and Germany on issues like the budget. 9.23am: ConservativeHome is always worth reading, but it’s particularly useful during a Conservative conference. Its summary of all the Tory stories in today’s papers is up on the site now. 9.18am: You’ll have noticed that David Cameron did not have much to say about the economy in his interview with the Sunday Times. I trust he’ll make up for that on the Marr show. The interview should be starting soon. 8.55am: While we wait for David Cameron to appear on the Andrew Marr show, here are some more highlights from David Cameron’s interview with the Sunday Times (paywall). • Cameron has said that redundant government land will be handed to developers so that they can build up to 100,000 homes. The Sunday Times used this as their second story from the interview. (They led on Cameron’s apology to women – see 8.42am.) Here’s an extract from the story (paywall). The government is to hand thousands of acres of land to developers to build homes. In an attempt to boost growth the prime minister has unveiled plans for 100,000 homes on sites that have been developed but have since fallen into disuse. Construction companies will be allowed to take over the areas for nothing and will pay for the land only when the properties are sold. (Actually, this is just an extension of a scheme announced by Grant Shapps, the housing minister, in March.) • Cameron said the EU needed to cut regulation. I’m not defeatist about it, but I think Europe needs a wake-up-and-smell-the-coffee moment, in terms of, ‘We’ve got the single market, can we now put it to use to help grow our economies?’ There’s too much coming through about cost and regulation and not enough that’s about freedom of trade and business and investment and expansion. • He defended the government’s decision to reform the planning laws. Look, the planning system needs reform, it really does. When you have guidance that runs to thousands of pages it just becomes an enormous regulatory quagmire. It’s also completely untrusting of local authorities. It’s almost saying ‘those idiots in town halls can’t make decisions.’ I think that’s wrong. • And he attacked the critics of the planning reforms for misrepresenting what the government was doing. We’re not changing the rules about areas of outstanding natural beauty, the green belt or sites of special scientific interest. Frankly, some of the things that have been printed have been really quite misleading. Partly on the basis that because you’re simplifying guidance it enables someone to write, say, that it doesn’t mention bats — so it’s the ‘end of the bat’. But it isn’t! • He described himself as “an absolute lover of the British countryside”. He liked going for long walks and cycling in the countryside, he said. “The idea that I would want to see the British countryside ruined is completely ridiculous.” • He said that it was “essential” that the government stuck to its deficit reduction plans. • He suggested that MPs shout obscenities at him during PMQs. (I presume he’s referring to Labour MPs.) This came when he was explaining his comments to Angela Eagle and Nadine Dorries. (See 8.42am.) The noise in that place is unbelievable. The things that people shout at you … you just wouldn’t … you just couldn’t print them in a family newspaper … [PMQs] serves a purpose in that the whole country can see that the prime minister can get asked any question about anything; and you [can] see, are they up to the job? Do they know what’s going on in government? You’ve got to demonstrate that. And also it serves a sort of purpose in that because I need to know everything that’s going on in the deepest recesses of government, I find out all sorts of stuff. So it’s actually a good way of government being accountable to me. But is it an enjoyable half-hour that I look forward to every week? No, it bloody isn’t. 8.42am: Party conferences used to provide an opportunity for politicians to tell the public about all the many things that they had got right. But if you pick up a copy of the Sunday Times today, you could be forgiven for thinking that that’s all changed. At the Labour conference last week Ed Balls and others spent much of their time talking about the mistakes that the party made when it was in office. And this morning David Cameron has decided to engage in a spot of humble apologising too. But not to the entire nation – only to women. He tells the Sunday Times (paywall) that he is sorry that his remarks at PMQs to the Labour frontbencher Angela Eagle (“Calm down, dear”) and the Tory MP Nadine Dorries (whom he described as “frustrated”, prompted smutty laughter) were misinterpreted. It’s my fault. I’ve got to do better, I totally accept. I’m the one who’s got to explain who I am and what I’m like and what I think … What I find frustrating is that I’m not a sort of ‘All right luv, I’m down at the pub tonight’ whatever. That’s not me. But obviously I’ve come across in this way … If I offended anyone [with the "Calm down, dear" comment] I am hugely sorry. That is not what I wanted to do. It was a light-hearted reference. Catchphrases stick with me. I’ll be taking a look at the other Conservative party conference stories in the papers later this morning. But I’ll be focusing on Cameron’s interview with Andrew Marr, which should start at about 9.30am. I’ll be blogging it minute-by-minute, and afterwards I’ll post a comprehensive summary, as well as bringing you any reaction. The conference proceedings start after lunch. Here’s the agenda. Around 9.30am: David Cameron gives an interview to the Andrew Marr show. 2pm: Fiona Hodgson, president of the Conservative national convention, and Lady Warsi , the Conservative co-chairman, open the conference. 2.20pm: Session on a United Kingdom, with contributions from Cheryl Gillan , the Welsh secretary, Andrew Davies , the leader of the Conservative group in the Welsh assembly, David Mundel, a Scotland Office minister, and Annabel Goldie , leader of the Scottish Conservatives. Owen Paterson , the Northern Ireland secretary, winds up, 3.20pm: Session on the environment and climate change, with contributions from Caroline Spelman , the environment secretary, Richard Benyon, the environment minister, and Charles Hendry and Greg Barker, energy ministers. 4pm: Session on international development, with contributions from Stephen Crabb MP and Lady Jenkin. Andrew Mitchell , the international development secretary. 4.30pm: Speech from William Hague , the foreign secretary. There’s also a huge TUC rally in Manchester today against the spending cuts. Up to 30,000 people are expected to attend. It will culminate in a rally at Number One First Street at 2pm. As usual, I’ll be covering all the conference breaking news, as well as bringing you the best comment from the web. I’ll post a lunchtime summary at around 1pm, and an afternoon one at about 5pm. Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Conservatives David Cameron William Hague Andrew Sparrow guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

At the Politico, James Hohmann's biography page indicates that he is “an Honors graduate of Stanford University” who “studied American political history.” I hope he skipped class during the time his profs covered the 1990s, because if not, he and many other classmates have been badly misled. Hohmann covered Bill Clinton's commemoration of the twentieth anniversary of his presidential candidacy announcement at his library in Little Rock, Arkansas, and let the following Clintonian howlers go by without challenge: Bill Clinton wants more credit Bill Clinton thinks he deserves more credit for reforming welfare and balancing the budget. “I go crazy every time I read the conventional wisdom,” he said Friday night at his presidential library in Little Rock, Ark. “So part of the Republican narrative is that I was 'saved' from myself by the election of the Republican Congress [in 1994] that 'forced me' to do welfare reform and ‘made the balanced budget possible.'” Clinton said reporters and commentators “keep saying this, overlooking all relevant facts.” The 42nd president said Arkansas had been a test case for reform during his governorship. At the federal level, he said 43 states received federal waivers to implement welfare reform before the GOP-controlled House passed the final bill. “And yet I kept reading how this was ‘a Republican idea,’ just because President Reagan had a good story about a welfare queen and a Cadillac who didn’t exist,” Clinton said. The feisty comments came during 20 minutes of unscripted remarks that immediately followed a one-hour panel discussion commemorating the 20th anniversary of Clinton announcing his run for president in front of the nearby state house. They showcased a Clinton determined to present himself as a transformational figure. The historical record shows that Bill Clinton doesn't deserve credit for welfare reform, and doesn't deserve credit for the balanced budget. As to welfare reform, it was a Republican idea not because of what Ronald Reagan said, but because of what former Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson did. As the Wall Street Journal wrote in a 2006 editorial excerpted at my home blog (bold is mine): Reform really took off in the early 1990s as Governors, led by Wisconsin’s Tommy Thompson, took the initiative. They battled for waivers from the feds, and then one of their own, Mr. Clinton, decided to run for the White House in 1992 using welfare reform as a way of proving his New Democrat bona fides. He quickly shelved the idea in his first two years, bowing to a Democratic Congress. But when Republicans won the House in 1994, they made it one of their priorities. Mr. Clinton declared this week that the bill he signed was a “bipartisan” triumph, and in a narrow sense it was. But 98 Democrats opposed him on the House floor, including many of the Democrats who would chair committees in the House if they re-take Congress in November. Mr. Clinton also vetoed reform twice before finally signing it in 1996 after his political guru Dick Morris told him it was the one issue that could cost him re-election. Make no mistake: This was a conservative reform opposed every step of the way by the political left and its media allies. Exactly: Media Research Center CyberAlerts at the time carried multiple examples of liberals like Charles Grodin, Walter Cronkite and others predicting hordes of Americans starving in the streets if welfare reform became law. Six June-August 1996 examples are at the top of this Google search on [Cyberalert "welfare reform"] (typed exactly as indicated between brackets). Both Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton made a point of emphasizing how the bill the President had signed would need to be “fixed.” The fears of the status quo's defenders never materialized, and the Clintons never “fixed” anything. The welfare rolls dropped from a 1996 average of 12.3 million to less than 4.5 million in 2000. It's likely that at least 1.5 million adults entered the workforce during that four-year period who would otherwise have stayed on the dole. As to Clinton's claim of responsibility for the late-1990s balanced budget — first, as noted, he had to be dragged kicking and screaming into welfare reform, which saved billion in entitlement spending while adding billions in tax collections. More crucially, it was the 1997 Republican Congress which did the heavy lifting, particularly then-Congressman and now Ohio Governor John Kasich. As the Associated Press wrote when Kasich declared his Buckeye State candidacy in 2009: “Kasich, a 9-term Congressman from Ohio, was the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives’ Budget Committee in 1997 that balanced the nation’s budget for the first time in more than 30 years.” As I wrote at the time: Kasich and his committee (with his senatorial colleagues) balanced the budget. Bill Clinton did NOTHING on the spending side to balance the budget except sign the related bills. What Clinton deserves some credit for is getting on board with the supply-side capital gains tax cut in 1997 that created a gusher on the revenue side — a cut passed by the GOP Congress over strenuous objections from some Democrats. With welfare reform, Bill Clinton was a stubborn, reluctant, and self-preserving; his signature on the bill had nothing to do with anything resembling principled commitment to reform. With the balanced budget, Clinton was mostly a spectator who has basked in undeserved glory for over a decade in what Republicans created. The Politico's Hohmann either knew better and decided not to interject the truth into his report, or he didn't learn much about the 1990s when he was at Stanford. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Continue reading …