It’s fair to say that Adam Levine probably won’t be interviewed on Fox News any time soon. The Maroon 5 singer, never afraid to speak his mind, sent out a tweet on Wednesday aimed at the news network. “Dear Fox News, don’t play our music on your evil fucking channel ever again. Thank you,” the singer wrote, though he gave no context for the tweet; previously, he pointed out that Kelsey Grammer and Chelsea Handlers’ names sounded alike and notified fans that he was listening to early 90s hip hop on his way to Valencia. Levine is an advocate for gay rights, and previously ripped Fox’s “American Idol” for suppressing the sexuality of its gay contestants. He is a judge on NBC’s “The Voice,” a rival of “American Idol.” Back in August, Levine tweeted obscenities at MTV, criticizing them for only featuring music during the VMAs.
Continue reading …As the media did a victory lap over Friday's announcement by President Obama that all American troops would be removed from Iraq by the end of the year, Fareed Zakaria took a surprisingly contrary position. Speaking from Tehran with a variety of CNN hosts throughout the day, Zakaria said this development was a disappointment for the United States and a victory for Iran (video follows with transcript and commentary): JOHN KING, HOST: A simple question up front. U.S. troops leaving Iraq by the end of the year, Iran has to view this as a victory. FAREED ZAKARIA: Oh, I'm sure it views it as a victory. Iran views what had happened in Iraq entirely from a kind of geopolitical prism. That is the U.S. and Iran are competing for influence in Iraq. They have viewed it that way from the start of the fall of the regime and they have their agents in there and Iran has long ties to many of threat groups that are now dominant in Iraq. Prime Minister Maliki and his party were in exile in Iran for 10 years. Many of the Kurdish leaders, including the current president of Iraq, was in Iran. Many of them speak fluent Persian. They have long and ongoing ties. Muqtada al-Sadr, when he finds that things get difficult for him in Iraq he head backs to Iran. So all of these political officials have been nourished sustained by Iran. And as American troops draw down, Iran's influence can only increase. KING: And this sounds incredibly crass, but is this a fair bottom line? That after almost nine years, billions of dollars in U.S. money and nearly 4,500 lives lost of brave U.S. service men and women, that Iran wins? ZAKARIA: One of the things I have always – looked on the idea of dealing with Saddam Hussein favorably is that whatever benefits we have gotten out of the operation in Iraq, the costs have been staggering, as you described. And those costs really seem to far outweigh benefits right now. KING: At the White House today the deputy national security adviser, Denis McDonough, said they're not that worried about Iran's influence. He says Iran is further isolated, has been weakened in recent years. ZAKARIA: Denis McDonough pointed out that Iran's been having a bad few months and I think that's entirely true. The Iranians have had trouble internally, they have had trouble abroad. The whole image of Iran in the wake of the Arab spring has been tarnished. And now these new allegations about the Saudi assassination plot. Iran's not in great shape. But on this specific issue I'm not sure I would agree. I think that Iran has maintained contacts with Iraq very successfully and very aggressively. Look, this is why the Americans couldn't get a deal done. Later on Friday, Zakaria elaborated on this with Wolf Blitzer on “The Situation Room”: ZAKARIA: It is important to point out this is the disappointment for the United States. The United States was in active negotiations with the Iraqi government to try to retain a residual force. The Central Command of the United States wanted a force much larger than 2,000 or 3,000. The debate that was taking place in the American Administration was whether to have 15,000 troops. Clearly, what happened was on the Iraqi side, they were simply not able to muster the political coalition to make the deal work. And that tells you that there were strong enough forces on – let us for simplicity sake call it the “pro-Iranian side” of the Iraqi political spectrum, the Muqtada al Sadr's of the world and others – that made it very difficult for this to move forward. So here we are in a situation where we will lose, without any question, day-to-day influence in Iraq and the Iranians will gain it. I think that it does fulfill a promise that President Obama had made, but there was a very easy path to maintain some kind of force level if this status of forces agreement had been negotiated. Clearly what happened was the Iraqis were unwilling to make that deal happen and so the president decided in that context he was going to make clear that there was no circumstance in which American troops were going to stay in Iraq without the legal status of forces agreement that we have with any country in which we have troops stationed.
Continue reading …The NFL isn’t making exceptions about its policy that players stay unplugged during games: It fined Troy Polamalu of the Steelers $10,000 for making a call from the bench during last Sunday’s game, reports the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette . Polamalu, though, wasn’t showboating or looking for some digital advantage—he borrowed…
Continue reading …If you’re reading this on your smartphone, you might want to go wash your hands now: A new study out of London finds that one out of six cellphones has fecal matter on it. UK researchers swabbed 390 mobile phones and the British hands that used them, and found that…
Continue reading …Marco Rubio got a taste of what it’s like to live in the klieg light of national politics this week. Ever since the Washington Post published a story accusing him of fudging the truth about his Cuban family history, Rubio has been on a media blitz to rebut the story….
Continue reading …Perk Unveiling – Klout Perk – Top Chef Texas Does Klout Have Clout? Nate Smith tries Axe Spiking Glue CruiseGuy says: @ MickyArison , your Klout Score is 60. Check out your @ klout profile today! http://t.co/JCMNZaIA
Continue reading …What happens in Glasgow stays in Glasgow—except when Brad Pitt comes to town to film a potential zombie blockbuster, and the city transforms into Scotland’s top destination spot so far this year. Calling it the “Brad Pitt effect,” the Daily Mail notes that Scotland’s No. 2 city boasted a…
Continue reading …News Corp’s shareholder meeting went pretty much as expected: Rupert Murdoch and sons took plenty of heat but survived a long-shot bid to oust them from control, reports the Los Angeles Times . The tally will be released next week, but given that the Murdoch family controls 40% of voting shares,…
Continue reading …Hope for the first elections of the Arab spring is mingled with frustration at continuing corruption and police brutality Tunisia votes on Sunday in its first ever free elections, the first vote of the Arab spring. But the mood of optimism is tempered with deep unease that, nine months after the revolution which ousted the dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, the country is still dominated by the corrupt and brutal vestiges of the old regime. Voting is to elect an assembly with one specific mission: to draw up a new constitution before parliamentary elections scheduled to take place within 12 months. The Islamist party An-Nadha, which was outlawed and brutally repressed by the Ben Ali regime, is expected to take the biggest share of the vote, and says it will defend democracy and women’s rights. But the complex proportional representation system means that, no matter how the votes are cast, no one party will have a majority or be able to dominate. On the street Tunisians, fiercely proud that their uprising launched the Arab spring, warned that the most pressing issue was safeguarding their “unfinished revolution.” Lawyers complain that police brutality and torture continues in the small north African country, which under Ben Ali was notorious as having the most pervasive secret police in the region. Human rights activists say Ben Ali’s cronies and former party sympathisers still dominate a crooked justice system, that corruption has worsened, and that notorious servants of the old regime have even been promoted since the revolution. Some describe a climate of impunity, symbolized by Ben Ali’s flight to Saudi Arabia, where he can avoid facing trail for his crimes. Meanwhile, in Tunisia, his influence continues to pervade officialdom and the workings of the state. “We are overwhelmed with cases of human rights abuses. You wouldn’t believe there had been a revolution,” said Imene Triki, a human rights activist. “Torture is the way things are done, it’s systematic. They have not changed their practices at all,” she said, warning of “countless” cases in police stations and prisons. She described: the “systematic and routine” arrests of bloggers and activists on fabricated charges, often of “burning police stations”; arrests of people labelled “Salafists” who were out of the country at the time their alleged crimes were committed; and the arrests of children. Triki described one case, of an alleged robber who was transferred to hospital from prison with a stomach complaint. While in hospital, she claims, he was brutally beaten and sexually assaulted in front of the doctors, nurses and other patients. Triki says she found him with his legs chained to the bed and severe injuries to his genitals and that in the same hospital she found another prisoner lying in the emergency ward, his body festering with worms and covered in excrement. He had, she says, been there for a month. Ahmed Rahmouni, head of the Association of Tunisian Magistrates, described a rotten justice system – still in place – in which judges were used by Ben Ali as a “tool of repression” to crack down on civil society. Although some judges were independent, he said, the overwhelming system remained in thrall to politicians and dominated by those who served Ben Ali. These judges continue to try cases. “The country’s top judges are corrupt, inefficient and an instrument of dictatorship. We need to get rid of them, and restore trust in the judiciary,” he said. Sihem Bensedrine, a human rights activist and head of Kalima radio station, has returned from exile but has still not been issued with a licence for her radio station, which broadcasts online. She said: “The revolution cut off the head, but the body is still there. Dictatorships aren’t just about security per se – they are also about the security forces controlling the media, culture, health care, universities, hospitals. You need to dismantle the whole machine. There are three elements: the secret police, the old guard of the former ruling party and the businessmen corrupted by working with the regime. These three are still powerful, they still have long arms.” After nine months of discredited and weak interim governments featuring ageing faces from Tunisia’s recent past, Tunisians insist that the old guard must be rooted out of officialdom and daily life, and that this must be coupled with quick answers to the country’s major problem, unemployment, a central cause of the revolution. Officially at 19%, unemployment has soared since January, but most believe the real figures are far higher. The jobless rate for graduate women is over 40%. In the poorer interior of the country the figures are double the national rate. Lina Ben Mhenni, a blogger who was nominated for this year’s Nobel peace prize, warned that Tunisia was being held back by the old regime and “after a few weeks of revolutionary euphoria” the country once again risked turning into a police state with the regime’s apparatus still in place. Disillusioned at the ongoing presence of the old regime, she said she wouldn’t vote. In purely political terms, Ben Ali’s ruling RCD party has been dissolved and its figureheads are forbidden from standing for election. But in a bewildering political landscape of over 110 new parties and scores of independent candidates, several small, marginal new parties have regrouped supporters from the old RCD. They aim to win over a dozen seats between them. In the offices of one new party, Al-Watan, the Nation or Homeland, its leader Mohamed Jegham said there was a prevailing current in Tunisia since the revolution “and we can’t go against the current”. But Jegham, a one-time interior minister and defence minister of Ben Ali, said he was proud of what he called the good state infrastructure left behind by the Ben Ali era and said the country “needs people who know the terrain”. He was critical of the removal of regional governors linked to the regime. Formerly minister in charge of police, he said: “The police needs to go back to being in the service of the country, of the nation, and not just in the service of the president or ministers. Not all officers can do that. There will be change – some have left, some are more reticent – the majority can do it.” He said corruption must be stopped but that it would not be easy. “We need new laws and for those to be respected.” Saida Lakrimi, of the Tunisian lawyers union, said: “We are in a transitional period, but the pace is very, very slow. Changes to institutions need to happen more quickly to cleanse the system … Popular discontent will fester if those who robbed and killed and tortured are not tried in a fair and transparent way … You can’t create the future using the tools of the past.” Journalists’ organisations complained that even the media, which was so tightly censored under Ben Ali that even the airbrushed photographs of the great man were chosen and provided by his office, was yet to be overhauled. Kamel Labiti, head of the commission for media reform, said the media landscape had not changed. Media owners still had connections in the administration, and undue influence. “We have a culture of praising the king. You can’t change that in a few months,” he said, also citing a lack of training for journalists. He said that “for decades journalists have effectively been civil servants.” Najiba Hamrouni of the journalists union said: “Since the revolution we have greater freedom in terms of what we can cover in the mainstream press, who we can interview and so on. However, the problem is that the main media organisations are controlled and run by the same Ben Ali men, and they are censoring their journalists. Managers dictate editorial policy. Some people and issues are marginalised.” New press titles have launched but many have folded through lack of funds. On the streets of central Tunis, most people were optimistic that the elections could mark the beginning of the end of the unfinished revolution. But people were vigilant. Many vowed that if they sensed anything but total transparency and fair elections, they would once again take to the street. Rhamouni said he saw a new “dynamism and plurality in Tunisian society”, which gave him hope. “Tunisian people believe they started the first revolution in the Arab world. They won’t accept the manipulation of their will. It is not just the elite who are talking about the need to cleanse the judiciary, but ordinary people. There is an unprecedented state of awareness in the country.” Tunisian elections 2011 Tunisia Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali Angelique Chrisafis Katharine Viner Becky Gardiner guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Ultraconservative Prince Nayef, who was behind suppression of protests in neighbouring Bahrain, becomes likely successor The death of the heir to the Saudi throne, Crown Prince Sultan bin Abdul-Aziz al Saud, has led to an urgent debate over the succession in the oil-rich state. Sultan, who was in his 80s, had been undergoing treatment for colon cancer in New York, although Saudi TV, which announced the death today, only said he had died “abroad”. The younger half-brother of Saudi Arabia’s frail and ailing leader, King Abdullah, Sultan was also deputy prime minister and defence minister, in charge of one of the biggest arms budgets in the world. He leaves multiple widows and 32 children. The most likely candidate to replace him as Abdullah’s successor is Prince Nayef, a member of the most powerful of the Saudi ruling families. Nayef, 78, is the Saudi interior minister, in charge of the security forces, and is close to Islamic ultra-conservatives. He was directly involved in the decision in March to send soldiers into neighbouring Bahrain to help crush pro-reform demonstrations. Abdullah gave Nayef the position of second deputy prime minister, traditionally the post of the second in line to the throne. But for the first time the mechanism of picking the next crown prince is in doubt as the king could hand over the decision to the Allegiance Council, created as part of Saudi Arabia’s tentative reforms, and consisting of his male relatives. That would open the process up, although observers expect Nayef to be the favourite there as well. Saudi Arabia has been ruled since 1953 by the children of its founder, King Abdul-Aziz, who had more than 40 sons. But that generation is ageing and secrecy surrounds their health. It was an American diplomatic cable, reported through WikiLeaks, that revealed Sultan was incapacitated with illness. Abdullah had surgery last week, said to be on his back. The palace said that the king, with “deep sorrow” mourns “the loss of his brother”. The statement, on the official Saudi Press Agency, added that the funeral would be held in Riyadh. Prince Charles sent his condolences in a letter to the Saudi king. The foreign secretary, William Hague, said that he was saddened to hear of the death. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, called Sultan a “good friend to the United States”. It is not known what effects any succession would have on recent reforms to allow women to vote in 2015. Saudi Arabia King Abdullah Bahrain Middle East Tracy McVeigh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …