One of Nebraska’s most popular tourist attractions is up on the auction block. Just outside of Alliance in western Nebraska, Carhenge was conceived as a tribute to England’s prehistoric Stonehenge, constructed of vintage cars instead of stone monoliths. It is operated by the nonprofit organization Friends of Carhenge, who are offering it for sale at
Continue reading …Betty Confidential was at New York Comic Con recently, where it caught one particularly spooky panel: “Celebrity Ghost Stories.” Read on, if you dare: Kate Hudson: Apparently one of the most haunted celebs around, Hudson says she’s seen ghosts more times than she can number, including a beyond-the-grave version of…
Continue reading …Barack Obama has an unlikely role model in his bid for re-election: George W. Bush, circa 2004. So says the AP and New York Times , who separately report that Obama strategists are so struck by the similarities between Bush’s campaign against John Kerry and the 2012 race that they are…
Continue reading …An amusing online meme expression sums up so much about cat behavior: “If it fits, I sits.” It also aptly characterizes the above video of a cat who has a rather strange place she likes to perch.
Continue reading …Apple’s first television advertisement for the iPhone 4S began airing on Thursday and it bills the new smartphone as Apple’s most amazing iPhone yet. Titled simply “Assistant,” the ad places Apple’s new virtual personal assistant Siri front and center as it rapidly passes through a montage of iPhone 4S owners calling on Siri for help. One man asks Siri how to tie a bow tie, while a concerned woman… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Boy Genius Report Discovery Date : 21/10/2011 02:49 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Liberation declaration will lead to elections, a new government and constitution. But resurgence of rivalries remains a concern Libya’s new leaders will put a formal end to Muammar Gaddafi’s 42-year rule on Sunday when they declare the country liberated and ready for a free and democratic future. Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, the justice minister under the old regime and now president of the western-backed National Transitional Council (NTC), is expected to make the announcement in the eastern city of Benghazi, where the most successful but by far the bloodiest of this year’s “Arab spring” uprisings erupted in February. No definitive figures are available, but about 30,000 people are estimated to have been killed and thousands more injured. Elaborate celebrations are planned three days after Gaddafi’s sensational and much photographed death in the coastal city of Sirte, the last bastion of loyalist resistance. Worryingly, plans to issue the declaration in Benghazi have attracted criticism because of echoes of historic rivalry between eastern and western Libya and fears that regional, tribal and political divisions that were kept in check in the past could now resurface. The liberation will trigger a timetable for elections within eight months for a 200-strong National Council that will draft a constitution and form an interim government. It is a daunting pace and a huge challenge for a country that has not had an election since the 1950s, when Libya was ruled by King Idris, a western-backed monarch who was overthrown in 1969 by Gaddafi and fellow nationalist army officers, who were admirers of Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser. The formation of the country’s first post-revolution political movement, the Libyan Solidarity party, headed by a previously exiled banker, was due to be announced last night. Mahmoud Jibril, the NTC prime minister, who is now expected to step down, said that the death of Gaddafi had left him feeling “relieved and reborn”. In Tripoli, there is an atmosphere of unbridled elation and optimism about the post-Gaddafi era – and profound relief that with his death the old regime has finally gone. Uncertainty remains, however, about the whereabouts of other key figures, like the dictator’s second son, Saif al-Islam, erstwhile reformer and darling of the west; and of the hated security chief Abdullah Senussi – who was reported to have been spotted in northern Niger. But no one believes in the possibility of a regime comeback. According to unconfirmed reports, Saif was captured and badly injured, but there is speculation that he may also have been summarily killed. “In Hay al-Islam, where I live [in Tripoli], most of my neighbours did support Gaddafi, but once they heard the news of his death on Thursday you could feel that change quickly,” said Mahmoud Umran, 23, an electrician. “Now there are no more green flags flying.” Khalid al-Jibouni of the Tripoli Youth Union – a volunteer organisation promoting civil society – had no doubts. “Now Gaddafi is dead, the pillars of the regime have all fallen,” he said. “Until now, some people still thought that Gaddafi could somehow come back. No one else but him matters. Now we can really breathe freely.” In Tripoli, celebrations continued, with street parties and a permanent combination of funfair and patriotic rally in Martyrs’ Square in the city centre. Mobile phone messages and television advertisements urged an end to the dangerous and deafening habit of celebratory gunfire, which has caused several deaths and scores of injuries. “The best thing is that we can now close the Gaddafi chapter and move on,” said Muhannad Alamir, a businessman. “If he had been captured or put on trial, it would have dragged on. Yes, in an ideal world he would have been brought to justice. Yes, we should be more civilised than he was. But this was poetic justice. It means closure.” Looking beyond the liberation ceremony, the NTC faces a mammoth task. Tensions have emerged between easterners, and the rebel leaders from Misrata, Tripoli and other western areas who take credit for the Nato-backed uprising that captured the capital in August, and now complain of being under-represented politically. Benghazi has special weight as the home of much of the important oil industry and the country’s main source of wealth. “We need an inclusive government,” said an official of the powerful Tripoli Military Council, which has a sometimes tense relationship with the civilian members of the NTC, and whose heavily armed fighters are far more important than the old Libyan army. “If anyone can hold things together, Abdel-Jalil can,” predicted Ahmed al-Atrash Ahmed, a political scientist at Tripoli University. “It’s true that some in Tripoli are unhappy that the declaration of liberation is being issued in Benghazi – but that’s where the revolution began after all.” The signs are that opposition from some battalions within the rebel coalition – especially the 17
Continue reading …David Cameron vows to face down Eurosceptic MPs as eurozone finance ministers close in on cash deal for banks The Conservative party has descended into open warfare over Europe as David Cameron vows to face down the expanding ranks of Eurosceptic MPs demanding a referendum on the UK’s EU membership. Ahead of a Commons vote on Monday that is likely to see the biggest revolt of Cameron’s premiership so far, with up to 60 MPs defying the whip, Downing Street struck a defiant note, insisting that the prime minister would not give an inch to the rebels. “We have to have a fight on these issues some time and there is no time like the present,” said a senior official. “People have to sober up. Having a referendum on membership is not our policy.” In a high-risk move that could inflame sentiment in the party even further, the prime minister will stick by his insistence on a three-line whip, effectively ordering MPs to reject the referendum motion. Downing Street said the prime minister would take a “dim view” of those who defied him, and indicated they could say goodbye to chances of promotion. As Tory MPs voiced their disgust at the stance, former Tory leadership contender and ex-minister for Europe David Davis suggested the government was fighting shy of a referendum because it fears the British public would vote to leave the EU or drastically change the terms of membership. In a message to Cameron and his ministers, Davis said: “Do not refuse the people their right to answer the question just because you’re afraid of what the answer could be.” Another senior MP, the Tory chairman of the public administration committee, Bernard Jenkin, said that if Cameron did not lift the three-line whip, the Conservative party would become “irrelevant in the eyes of voters”, many of whom were deeply concerned about the EU and wanted a say. In a further development that will fuel the Eurosceptic fire, one of the most vocal proponents of the European single currency, Lord Turner, admits he was incorrect to propose that the UK should have joined the euro at the start of the last decade. “I got it wrong,” Turner tells the Observer in an interview . Turner, who is now chairman of the Financial Services Authority, led a vociferous campaign for the UK to join the euro while he led the employers’ body, the CBI, during the late 1990s – and in 2002, when at City firm Merrill Lynch, he co-authored a seminal paper on “Why Britain should join the euro”. Downing Street said the prime minister was very sympathetic to the wider Eurosceptic cause and would fight for powers to be repatriated if and when a new treaty was negotiated. But, with the eurozone in crisis, the UK had to play its part now in sorting out the mess, rather than being distracted by a referendum. Nick Clegg, who has been demanding that EU leaders concentrate on long-term growth and competitiveness, said talk of a referendum was a “dangerous form of displacement activity”. Clegg said: “I think we have to deal with the emergency on our doorstep, rather than tilting at windmills.” As chancellor George Osborne joined fellow finance ministers in Brussels, it emerged that the EU could tap sovereign wealth funds from Asia and the Gulf in order to boost its financial firepower to bail out countries suffering debt distress in an attempt to prevent the contagion spreading. Finance ministers from the 17 eurozone countries are discussing the option of creating a “special purpose vehicle” for the European financial stability facility (EFSF) in order to boost its current €440bn [£383bn] lending capacity. This emerged as finance ministers from all 27 EU countries approved in principle plans to recapitalise some of Europe’s most important banks with around €90bn, so that they can withstand contagion from potential debt problems in other eurozone countries. Banks are also being told they face losses, or “haircuts”, of at least 40% on their exposure to Greek debt, according to ministers. Senior EU officials have been dispatched to speed up negotiations with holders of sovereign bonds. But one source cautioned: “Nothing has been agreed until everything has been agreed.” Desperate EU leaders are trying to stitch together a “comprehensive and ambitious” deal to solve the sovereign debt crisis over the next few days, starting with an EU summit, at which David Cameron will be present, and then a eurozone summit later today. A deal is due to be sealed at a second eurozone summit on Wednesday, but rumours have swept Brussels that yet another summit, possibly extended to non-euro countries such as Britain, could also be called. The idea of creating a special purpose vehicle for the EFSF, according to sources, would be to attract further money from both official and private investors, with the sovereign wealth funds of countries such as China, Singapore or Qatar a prime target. Some of these already invest in European banks such as Barclays and UBS. Qatar has already invested in distressed Greek banks and is thought to be looking at other devalued European assets. Its premier, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, said of EU efforts to solve the crisis: “If there is nothing positive then we will find a very difficult situation, not only in Europe but in the world, that would take a decade to fix.” Downing Street officials said Cameron, who will attend a meeting of EU heads of government in Brussels today, might cut short a visit this week to New Zealand and Australia, where he is due to attend the Commonwealth heads of government conference, if a further, full EU summit of all 27 nations is called. Conservatives European Union Europe David Davis European banks Banking David Cameron Toby Helm Jill Treanor David Gow guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …enlarge Um, okay, Texas. To save money you’re going to take away prisoners’ lunches on the weekends? Really? Really. Via the New York Times : Thousands of other inmates in the Texas prison system have been eating fewer meals since April after officials stopped serving lunch on the weekends in some prisons as a way to cut food-service costs. About 23,000 inmates in 36 prisons are eating two meals a day on Saturdays and Sundays instead of three. A meal the system calls brunch is usually served between 5 and 7 a.m., followed by dinner between 4 and 6:30 p.m. The meal reductions are part of an effort to trim $2.8 million in food-related expenses from the 2011 fiscal year budget of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the state prison agency. Other cuts the agency has made to its food service include replacing carton milk with powdered milk and using sliced bread instead of hamburger and hot dog buns. Prison administrators said that the cuts were made in response to the state’s multibillion-dollar budget shortfall in 2011, and that the weekend lunches were eliminated in consultation with the agency’s health officials and dietitians. Michelle Lyons, an agency spokeswoman, said that inmates with health problems who have been prescribed a therapeutic diet continue to receive three meals per day. Prison riots can start over something as trivial as a stolen toothbrush, or yes, food. This is why most prisons have decent food and make sure inmates get three square meals a day. So I guess in Texas’ case, they’re prepared to just shoot first and ask questions later, since riots don’t appear to be on their list of concerns. Also, I’m curious to know whether these cuts were made in Texas private prisons, or the state-run prisons. It seems that the private prisons cost the state a pretty penny, and several were closed in 2011 as part of the budget process. However, others remain open for business as usual. Texas Governor Rick Perry is a favorite of the private prison industry. After they bankrolled his 2010 re-election bid in large numbers, he tried to take control of the prison decision-making process along with some Republican buddies. Mother Jones : A flurry of privatization bills were introduced by Republican lawmakers during the regular, biannual legislative session, but all of them fizzled out. And then in June, as the Legislature scrambled to put together a budget during a special session, the plan resurfaced in two different pieces of legislation. First, an amendment was attached by a GOP lawmaker to an unrelated bill that would have transferred the authority for the state’s prison health care board to Perry by giving him the power to appoint the majority of the committee members. That proposal, which was jettisoned after it came to light, would have effectively given the governor’s office the power to unilaterally make sweeping changes to the system. “There was no evidence that it could be done cheaper,” says state Rep. Jerry Madden, a Republican, who chairs the House corrections subcommittee and worked to have the language removed. A second proposal, a few days later, would have explicitly granted the corrections agency the power to solicit bids for prison health care services but not mandated it. Earlier, Perry’s office had floated another proposal that seemed designed to please the private-prison industry. It sought to eliminate the independence of the Texas Commission on Jail Standards and fold it, along with two other public-safety commissions, into a single agency. The governor’s office justified the move, which ultimately fell short, as a spending measure, a chance to eliminate bureaucratic redundancies. But critics saw a pattern. “One of the things that the commission has always wanted is to have control over the private prisons,” says Ana Yanez-Correa, executive director of the Texas Criminal Justice Coalition, which monitors prison reform in the Lone Star State. “Obviously [the governor’s office] didn’t like that, so this session they tried to dilute the power of the commission by merging it with two other entities.” And, as expected, lawmakers have a retort for critics, too: State Senator John Whitmire, a Democrat and chairman of the Senate Criminal Justice Committee whose outrage over last meals on death row led to the end of the practice last month, said the reductions were not a major concern to him. “If they don’t like the menu,” he said, “don’t come there in the first place.” I wonder how those private prison companies would feel about that?
Continue reading …From The Poetry Foundation By Daniel Nester There are two kinds of people in this world: those who think the Doors are a hokey caricature of male rock stardom and those who think they’re, you know, shamans. The Doors, who took their name from a line in William Blake’s The Marriage of Heaven and Hell (“If the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is, infinite”), combined jazz chord changes and Latin rhythms with flamenco, surf, raga, blues, and psychedelia, all in one ’60s rock band, often in one song: “Light My Fire,” “The End,” “Roadhouse Blues,” and “People Are Strange,” just to name a few. The power of the Doors’ music is that it is so unabashedly arty that it begs to be made fun of, especially by older people or those who went through Doors periods themselves and are now into Steely Dan or Animal Collective or some other less embarrassing musical endeavor. And why embarrassing? Because the Doors reflect a conflict many of us have with artists we think we have outgrown. For those with a youthful bent, sustained naïveté, or a poetical inclination, the combination of the Doors’ music and Jim Morrison’s lyrics can be transformative. In Just Kids, Patti Smith’s memoir depicting her early days in New York and friendship with artist Robert Mapplethorpe, the singer neatly encapsulates how she, and many others, “felt both kinship and contempt for [Morrison]” while watching him perform for the first time. “I observed his every move in a state of cold hyperawareness. I remember this feeling much more clearly than the concert. I felt, watching Jim Morrison, that I could do that.” But for those same people a few years on, the Morrison mythology of a rock-singer-slash-poet whose lyrics reflect influences from the Romantics, French Symbolists, and Beats feels, at best, silly, and so he becomes one of the better punch lines to any number of poetry jokes. But the Lizard King is not dead. Although it may not shock that Doors music is still popular, what might surprise is that Jim Morrison’s poetry still has an audience. As I write this, the remastered CD of An American Prayer, a Jim Morrison spoken-word album posthumously released in 1978, sits at number one on Amazon’s “Music > Miscellaneous > Poetry, Spoken Word & Interviews” chart, ahead of Jim Carroll and Alcoholics Anonymous and neck-and-neck with Tom Waits. Morrison’s collections of poetry continue to sell, too. Two of his three poetry titles reside semipermanently on Amazon’s poetry best-seller list—Wilderness: The Lost Writings of Jim Morrison, Volume 1 (#26) and The Lords and the New Creatures (#40)—sitting alongside Allen Ginsberg, Mary Oliver, and Tupac Shakur, and ahead of Eliot, Frost, Poe, and Bishop. This is irritating to serious poetry people. But maybe there is something to Morrison’s poetry beyond the laughs. Maybe it’s time we considered him to be something beyond the “Bozo Dionysus” Lester Bangs saw him as. Maybe it’s time we accepted him as a bona fide American poet. * Back when I was in eighth grade, a man with an acoustic guitar came to our class at Our Lady of Perpetual Help School in Maple Shade, New Jersey, to sing songs about drugs. About not doing drugs, I mean. He used to do a lot of drugs, he said, and lived the whole rock-and-roll lifestyle. His was a death-style, he said, and now that he didn’t do any drugs, he loved his life and was closer to God. A couple kids raised their hands to tell stories about uncles or older siblings who did drugs and how bad drugs were. It was relatively moving. Just when he was going to sing his last drugs-are-bad song, our visitor spotted a copy of No One Here Gets Out Alive, Jerry Hopkins and Danny Sugerman’s 1980 best-selling biography of Jim Morrison, on a girl’s desk. He picked it up. “I’ll give you five dollars not to read this book,” he said. The book glorifies drugs, he said, and would lead her down the “wrong path.” He took a bill out of his pocket and slapped it down. “He was a poet,” our visitor sagely said. “I’ll give you that.” I remember the girl took the money and the guy took the book. I also remember everyone thinking we had to find out who this Jim Morrison poet guy was. I biked over to Peaches, a record store owned by Moonies, and bought a copy of An American Prayer, the Jim Morrison spoken-word album released in 1978 with other Doors adding posthumous musical flourishes. I sat in my room with headphones and put the record on. It was, as best as I can recall, the first time I listened to a poet speak. * As I write this, the annual chatter about whether Bob Dylan might win the Nobel Prize for literature sends giggles through the commentariat. Although the poetry world loves hyphenates and slashes (Post-Avant! Fifth-Generation-New-York-School! Poet/Collagist! Poessay!), adding Rock Singer/Poet to the list of accepted terms is where most draw the line. While I’m not terribly interested in the interminable debate over whether rock lyrics qualify as “real” poetry, it turns out one can’t avoid it entirely when we speak of Jim Morrison, Gateway Poet, as a serious writer. It is mostly a losing proposition, I know. It is absurd. And yet I’m not willing to completely disregard what the eighth-grade me found so moving. * One rainy afternoon this summer, I took out my vinyl copy of An American Prayer, which I have dragged from apartment to apartment for a quarter century; put it on the turntable; and asked my 2,500-plus closest friends on Facebook if anyone was a fan, or used to be a fan, of Jim Morrison’s poetry. There were, of course, snarky responses. One suspected I was “trying to punk them or out people for their guilty pleasure,” while another joked that I should rephrase the question as whether anyone out there “had been a 13-year-old girl.” Poet Tim Suermondt told me he’d respond “as soon as I get back from my walk on Love Street.” Yes. Haha. But, surprisingly, most responses I got were heartfelt rather than dismissive. “Morrison was the first human I connected to living poetry (as opposed to dead poetry),” poet and memoirist Peter Conners wrote. “When I looked at his pics, I never thought Rock Star. I thought Poet . . . and then I thought Dangerous Poet. As a teenager getting intrigued by words, that was an important leap for me.” Todd Colby, a poet and himself a former rock singer (of Drunken Boat), quoted lines from “Ghost Song,” a track from An American Prayer: “Choose now, they croon / Beneath the moon / Beside an ancient lake.” Mike McCann, a friend from college I hadn’t spoken to in many years, quoted from “When the Music’s Over”: “Persian Night! See the Light! Save Us! Jesus! Save Us!” “Wilderness was the first book of poems I ever owned,” Ginger Heather, another poet, wrote. “A friend gave it to me for my 16th birthday. Our high school was a trade school, so I’m not sure I would have been introduced to anything like contemporary poetry otherwise.” * “I’m hung up on the art game, you know?” Morrison said in an interview with CBC Radio. “My great joy is to give form to reality. Music is a great release, a great enjoyment to me. Eventually I’d like to write something of great importance. That’s my ambition—to write something worthwhile.” Just how seriously Jim Morrison can be taken as a poet depends on whom you ask, but there’s no question that he regarded himself as the real deal. Starting with No One Here Gets Out Alive and each subsequent biography, Morrison is portrayed as carrying Arthur Rimbaud’s poetry books in his pocket or quoting from Nietzsche, all by way of suggesting the singer should be taken seriously as a poet, without many other reasons why. Like many real poets, Morrison self-published his work. The Lords: Notes on Vision appeared as single vellum pages with “© James Douglas Morrison 1969 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED” on the bottom of each page, housed inside a blue portfolio folder. He made 100 copies and gave them out to friends. Then came The New Creatures, a slim hardcover edition of 100 copies, privately printed in 1969. An Ode to LA while Thinking of Brian Jones, Deceased, a broadside or pamphlet, was handed out at concerts after the death of the Rolling Stones guitarist, and An American Prayer was printed in an edition of 500 in 1970. “Despite the high prices from dealers, they can’t always command them,” Ernest Hilbert, a poet who works as an antiquarian book dealer for Philadelphia’s Bauman’s Rare Books, tells me in an email. Hilbert mentioned the story of a dealer who failed to sell a copy of The New Creatures to a “very famous music mogul” for around $6,000. A copy of The Lords is on sale now for about $10,000. “They’re very rare signed because they came after his public life shut down and not long before his total life did.” In 1970, Simon & Schuster published The Lords and The New Creatures, which combined his first two books. Other than San Francisco poet and Morrison friend Michael McClure, who urged him to self-publish his work and pursue his writing, no one from the serious poetry world seemed to pay much attention. Despite this, the book is currently in its 50th printing. But clearly sales alone can’t transform one into a serious poet. That takes academia. * According my college library’s databases, a 1992 article, “Wild Child: Jim Morrison’s Poetic Journeys,” was the first academic work to address the notion that Morrison’s writing should be taken seriously as poetry. Written by Tony Magistrale, now chair of the English department at the University of Vermont, the study, published in the Journal of Popular Culture, first addresses the “glaring omission” in what has been written about the Doors: namely, the failure “to analyze Morrison’s contributions as a poet,” which starts with “separat[ing] commercial myth from poetic legacy.” Morrison, Magistrale writes, “is as much a product of the Romantic poetic vein as William Blake, Walt Whitman, Edgar Allan Poe, Emily Dickinson and the French Symbolists were a century before him.” Many of these writers were also obsessed with poetry as a means of vision and illumination, of “breaking through to the other side” to “discover what possible realms existed beyond the immediate and the material.” Morrison’s best works, Magistrale asserts, “defy quick dismissal.” Two decades later, Magistrale is still enthusiastic about Jim Morrison and the Doors. “I think the real poetry is in the songs,” he tells me on the phone. “That’s when Morrison’s poetry is at its most coherent and poetic.” People still contact Magistrale about his article, asking for comment or to reprint it, he says. Still, 40 years after the singer’s death, “We’ve got this ‘Morrison Hole,’ people who are writing crap about his poetics, that hasn’t been filled. You’ve got people out there writing about him who are not trained to read it.” Which is a shame, he says. “This guy still has something to say to us.” “And I would not hesitate for a minute to call lyrics like ‘Five to One’ real poetry,” he tells me. “‘Trading your hours for a handful of dimes’? That could come from ‘Prufrock’ or ‘The Waste Land.’ Or ‘I woke up this morning and I got myself a beer / The future’s uncertain, the end is always near.’ It might be his addiction or it might be nihilism, but what better description or encapsulation of the existential dilemma? This could be right out of Camus or Sartre. These monetary solutions are only going to take you so far, Morrison says. And no one really talks about that with his lyrics.” “‘Moonlight Drive,’” he tells me, is a “wonderful lyrical ballad” that “really dispels the notion of Jim Morrison as a misogynist.” “All that said,” Magistrale points out, there is “a lot of poetry that Jim Morrison wrote that is shit, pap—stuff he wrote when he was drunk, high on drugs, not capable of putting words into coherent sentences, much less rendering it poetically.” Magistrale first sent his article to The New Yorker. Its editor, David Remnick, wrote him back personally. “He wrote, ‘I’ve been wrestling with this essay for the last week. It’s the best thing I’ve ever read about Jim Morrison, and I don’t believe a word of it.’ That’s what I got back. I should have framed that fucking rejection.” * “The lyrics Jim Morrison wrote for the Doors are wonderful and chilling and moving,” David Lehman writes to me. Poet, critic, and series editor of The Best American Poetry, Lehman knows about song lyrics. His most recent book, A Fine Romance: Jewish Songwriters, American Songs, is a wide-ranging study of American standards. Morrison “brilliantly communicated states of extreme emotion,” he writes: “the rage of lust (‘Light My Fire’), a gentler desire (‘Touch Me’), paranoia, fear, sheer darkness.” Lehman’s answers remind me that, although Morrison regularly name-checked his favorite writers—in one interview he rattled off “Rimbaud, Apollinaire, Breton, Cendrars, Max Ernst, Céline, Burroughs,” and was still characterized by the journalist as “rambling”—his favorite singer late in life was the one and only standards master, Frank Sinatra. The thought of Francis Albert Sinatra singing James Douglas Morrison’s lyrics compels me to look up Ol’ Blue Eyes’ discography. Did he ever sing “Touch Me”? No dice, baby. “I think ‘People Are Strange,’ for example, is an outstanding rock lyric, very haunting, with artful use of repetition and a beautiful emphasis on that major-league word, strange,” Lehman writes. “He uses ‘stranger’ more in the manner of Camus than of Orson Welles, and it connects with ‘you’ the speaker as well as ‘you’ the listener: the existential ‘you.’” Lehman likes especially how Morrison interchanges “look” and “seem” with “are,” which suggest that “‘your’ state of mind is what’s at stake.” Lehman types out the lyrics in his email to “show how rhetorically balanced the first stanza is, each line divided into two clauses conjoined by ‘when.’” * But maybe, suggests Robert Pattison, professor of English at Long Island University and author of The Triumph of Vulgarity: Rock Music in the Mirror of Romanticism, “acceptance” would just be a way to kill off Morrison’s sales. “A fair number of rockers have convinced themselves that they are not in fact vulgar mutants of the 19th-century poets but their modern reincarnations,” Pattison writes in Triumph. I couldn’t help but ask Pattison: But what about Jim, man? What would be added to Morrison’s reputation if he were hailed as a poet? Should we put a couple of his poems on the Poetry Foundation website? Wouldn’t that be cool? “I’m not sure there’s any prestige in a rock lyricist also claiming the title of poet,” Pattison writes. “My guess is that the prestige runs the other way.” Pattison’s credo boils down to this: excellent rock songs, boring poems. “Why are slim volumes of deep thought superior to young rants? I think Morrison would be getting a demotion to be moved to the Poetry Foundation website. “Yes,” Pattison continues, “I think the fact the words are written for rock makes a difference. Try comparing Kurt Cobain’s lyrics with the poems he scribbled down. Millions justifiably remember the former; the latter are trite and embarrassing. There are so many good rock lyrics that I think they would swamp any poetry website. The works of Alex Chilton alone would drive out much of the competition. But the whole Internet is really a rock website, since you can summon up whole songs from fragments of lyrics or watch 15 different performances of any particular number. I’m not sure any more formal arrangement is necessary.” * Years after first seeing them in concert, Patti Smith spots a billboard for the Doors’ latest album, L.A. Woman, and overhears the band’s new single, “Riders on the Storm,” coming from a passing car. “I felt remorse that I had almost forgotten what an important influence Jim Morrison had been,” Smith writes. “He had led me on the path of merging poetry into rock and roll.” In a recent article in The New Yorker, critic Daniel Mendelsohn writes that “the chances that Rimbaud will become the bible of your life are inversely proportional to the age at which you first discover him.” The same applies for Morrison, who elicits the same types of “extraordinarily conflicted feelings of admiration and dismay.” Rimbaud is credited with being a student of poetry while he made his way rebelling against the world. Morrison, the American, is perennially cast as the wild man from the desert, bottle of Jack in hand. Both called for a “derangement of all the senses.” Both are examples of the poète maudit who lives outside normal conventions. A couple nights ago I sat at a table in Dirty Frank’s, my favorite Philadelphia bar, with two old friends, one from college and one from my hometown. Over pitchers of Yuengling and a walk around the block to smoke a bowl of pot I bought off another guy in my father’s group, I told them I was writing about Jim Morrison. As usual, it felt like a confession. Both smiled and told their Doors stories. Dan, the college friend, is a rock photographer who worshiped Sonic Youth as a teenager. He’s “still all about” “When the Music’s Over.” “Cancel my subscription to the resurrection!” he sang and lifted a mug. I once saw Tom, my hometown friend, who’s now a professor, make a classic rock DJ’s head explode at a party when he told him the band XTC “transcends the Beatles.” I thought he hated the Doors, but he confessed that he loves “Twentieth Century Fox,” a light track off their first album. “It’s Morrison’s version of ‘The Lady Is a Tramp,’” I offered. Once we got our giggles out, I realized we’d all gone through Morrison periods, as part of that rite of passage for some teenagers when they first encounter someone unembarrassed to be an artist. We all read Morrison’s poetry when we were younger. Just talking about Jim Morrison, I daresay, makes us old men feel young and free again. Others qualify for this spot as well—Plath, Ginsberg, Bukowski, Kerouac, Salinger, Lady Gaga, Rimbaud, Patti Smith. What is it about these artists that compels us to make fun of them later in life? We want the world and we want it now! “Listen, real poetry doesn’t say anything,” Morrison writes in Wilderness’s prologue. “It just ticks off possibilities.” When I first set out to write this essay, I hoped it would be a brilliant exegesis of Jim Morrison, Real Poet. In the back of my mind, I envisioned a couple of his poems featured as a sidebar, maybe a sequence of prose-poem aphorisms from The Lords to drive home how relevant and “now” he could be. But I have stopped worrying whether James Douglas Morrison—The Last Holy Fool, Sex God, Black Priest of the Great Society—can join the tenuous tribe of poets. He’s been showing up for the meetings for so long now, there’s no sense in throwing him out. This article first appeared on the Poetry Foundation website
Continue reading …