Who are the most powerful in the UK’s media right now? Dugald Baird Christine Oliver
Continue reading …Hopes raised for reviving negotiations to end Pyongyang’s nuclear programme after Kim Kye Gwan invited to New York A senior North Korean official is to visit the US this week to discuss the possible resumption of international negotiations on ending Pyongyang’s nuclear programmes, secretary of state Hillary Clinton said. Diplomats could be close to reviving six-nation disarmament talks, which broke off in 2008. The talks come after more than a year of tension between North and South Korea. Two attacks last year that Seoul blamed on Pyongyang killed 50 South Koreans and led to threats of war. Clinton’s invitation to the North Korean vice foreign minister, Kim Kye Gwan, to visit New York follows a meeting on Friday between nuclear negotiators from North and South Korea on the sidelines of a regional forum of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Bali. It was the first such meeting since disarmament talks collapsed in 2008, and the envoys agreed to work toward the resumption of six-nation negotiations. The recent diplomacy comes after more than a year of unity between Washington and Seoul since international investigators said a North Korean torpedo sank a South Korean warship in March last year killing 46 sailors. The South demanded the North show regret for the warship sinking, and for an artillery attack on a frontline South Korean island that killed four in November last year. North Korea denies a role in the sinking and says South Korea provoked the island shelling. While refusing to apologise, however, Pyongyang has repeatedly shown a willingness to return to disarmament talks. The North is believed to be seeking a diplomatic breakthrough and outside food aid before the 2012 centennial of the birth of the country’s founder, Kim Il-sung. “We are open to talks with North Korea, but we do not intend to reward the North just for returning to the table,” Clinton said in a statement announcing Kim Kye Gwan’s trip to the US. “We will not give them anything new for actions they have already agreed to take. And we have no appetite for pursuing protracted negotiations that will only lead us right back to where we have already been.” The wariness is in line with past US statements that its ally Seoul must be satisfied with the North’s sincerity before Washington will act. During Kim’s trip he will meet a team of US officials to explore his country’s commitment to returning to the international talks and taking concrete steps toward disarmament, Clinton said in the statement. The announcement follows a meeting between Clinton and the foreign ministers of South Korea and Japan in Bali. The nuclear negotiations involve the two Koreas, the US, China, Japan and Russia. The North Korean foreign minister, Pak Ui-chun, said the Korean peninsula now stands “on the crossroads of detente and the vicious cycle of escalating tension”. The countries involved, Pak said, must “make the best use of [the] opportunity of dialogue and make a bold decision to settle the fundamental issue”. Diplomats have been eager for the two rivals to ease tensions. Since the last round of talks, North Korea has conducted a second nuclear test and revealed a uranium enrichment facility that could give it another way to make atomic bombs. Recent North Korean threats against Seoul’s conservative government include a pledge to retaliate over South Korean soldiers’ use of pictures of the ruling North Korean family for target practice. The two Koreas remain in a technical state of war because their three-year conflict ended in a truce, not a peace treaty, in 1953. The United States has 28,500 troops in the South. That presence is cited by the North as a main factor in its need to build a nuclear program. North Korea Nuclear weapons South Korea Hillary Clinton United States guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Anyone who has tenuously clung to a diet knows calorie counting can turn into calorie binging at a restaurant, but choose one of these items and you’ll really have fallen off the wagon, ABC News reports. The Center for Science in the Public Interest released its list of eight dishes…
Continue reading …The depressing details of Amy Winehouse’s last days and hours continue to emerge , with the latest claims including reports that she bought cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, and ketamine late Friday night. Sources also say she was drinking heavily at the same time, and her emphysema could also have played a role….
Continue reading …Health secretary sends letter to Treasury warning the plans will not meet coalition’s ‘commitment to gold standard pensions’ The health secretary, Andrew Lansley, has privately attacked the government’s public sector pension reforms. In a letter to Treasury chief secretary Danny Alexander, Lansley warns that the plans, which were outlined last month, will not meet the coalition’s “commitment to maintain gold standard pensions”. He describes the proposed measures as “inappropriate” and “unrealistic,” and warns they are likely to hit women particularly hard. He also says they may encourage public sector workers, particularly those on lower pay, to simply stop contributing to their pensions, relying instead on state benefits to keep them afloat during their retirement, which would, he says, “increase pressure on the social security budget”. Last month Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, put forward plans to force public sector workers to retire later, contribute more into their pensions, and for retirement payments to be based on an average of entire career earnings, rather than final salary. The letter, leaked to the Telegraph, was written by Lansley two months ago. In it, he refers to a paper sent to the Cabinet setting out the pension proposals. He writes: “The paper … assumes that public sector workers, many of whom are women, will work a 48-year career [to get a full pension] … In the NHS currently, the average full-time career for those taking a pension is only 18 years and it seems unrealistic to suggest that pension scheme design should be based on the assumption that a predominantly female workforce would need to work full-time 48-year careers in future to receive a full pension. It is also difficult to see how this meets our commitment to maintain gold standard pensions.” In his five-page letter, the health secretary also claims that the reforms would be particularly unfair to NHS workers, many of whom already pay more for their pensions than civil servants or other government employees. The government is already facing the prospect of major strike action in the autumn on its plans to reform public sector pensions, and the emergence of dissension within its own ranks on the issue is likely to alarm David Cameron. It was previously thought that Conservative ministers were unanimous in their support of the reforms. Having been told of Lansley’s concerns over the reforms, the Labour party has called on him to speak out publicly. Public sector pensions Public services policy Andrew Lansley Danny Alexander Liberal-Conservative coalition Conservatives Liberal Democrats guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Health secretary sends letter to Treasury warning the plans will not meet coalition’s ‘commitment to gold standard pensions’ The health secretary, Andrew Lansley, has privately attacked the government’s public sector pension reforms. In a letter to Treasury chief secretary Danny Alexander, Lansley warns that the plans, which were outlined last month, will not meet the coalition’s “commitment to maintain gold standard pensions”. He describes the proposed measures as “inappropriate” and “unrealistic,” and warns they are likely to hit women particularly hard. He also says they may encourage public sector workers, particularly those on lower pay, to simply stop contributing to their pensions, relying instead on state benefits to keep them afloat during their retirement, which would, he says, “increase pressure on the social security budget”. Last month Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, put forward plans to force public sector workers to retire later, contribute more into their pensions, and for retirement payments to be based on an average of entire career earnings, rather than final salary. The letter, leaked to the Telegraph, was written by Lansley two months ago. In it, he refers to a paper sent to the Cabinet setting out the pension proposals. He writes: “The paper … assumes that public sector workers, many of whom are women, will work a 48-year career [to get a full pension] … In the NHS currently, the average full-time career for those taking a pension is only 18 years and it seems unrealistic to suggest that pension scheme design should be based on the assumption that a predominantly female workforce would need to work full-time 48-year careers in future to receive a full pension. It is also difficult to see how this meets our commitment to maintain gold standard pensions.” In his five-page letter, the health secretary also claims that the reforms would be particularly unfair to NHS workers, many of whom already pay more for their pensions than civil servants or other government employees. The government is already facing the prospect of major strike action in the autumn on its plans to reform public sector pensions, and the emergence of dissension within its own ranks on the issue is likely to alarm David Cameron. It was previously thought that Conservative ministers were unanimous in their support of the reforms. Having been told of Lansley’s concerns over the reforms, the Labour party has called on him to speak out publicly. Public sector pensions Public services policy Andrew Lansley Danny Alexander Liberal-Conservative coalition Conservatives Liberal Democrats guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Health secretary sends letter to Treasury warning the plans will not meet coalition’s ‘commitment to gold standard pensions’ The health secretary, Andrew Lansley, has privately attacked the government’s public sector pension reforms. In a letter to Treasury chief secretary Danny Alexander, Lansley warns that the plans, which were outlined last month, will not meet the coalition’s “commitment to maintain gold standard pensions”. He describes the proposed measures as “inappropriate” and “unrealistic,” and warns they are likely to hit women particularly hard. He also says they may encourage public sector workers, particularly those on lower pay, to simply stop contributing to their pensions, relying instead on state benefits to keep them afloat during their retirement, which would, he says, “increase pressure on the social security budget”. Last month Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, put forward plans to force public sector workers to retire later, contribute more into their pensions, and for retirement payments to be based on an average of entire career earnings, rather than final salary. The letter, leaked to the Telegraph, was written by Lansley two months ago. In it, he refers to a paper sent to the Cabinet setting out the pension proposals. He writes: “The paper … assumes that public sector workers, many of whom are women, will work a 48-year career [to get a full pension] … In the NHS currently, the average full-time career for those taking a pension is only 18 years and it seems unrealistic to suggest that pension scheme design should be based on the assumption that a predominantly female workforce would need to work full-time 48-year careers in future to receive a full pension. It is also difficult to see how this meets our commitment to maintain gold standard pensions.” In his five-page letter, the health secretary also claims that the reforms would be particularly unfair to NHS workers, many of whom already pay more for their pensions than civil servants or other government employees. The government is already facing the prospect of major strike action in the autumn on its plans to reform public sector pensions, and the emergence of dissension within its own ranks on the issue is likely to alarm David Cameron. It was previously thought that Conservative ministers were unanimous in their support of the reforms. Having been told of Lansley’s concerns over the reforms, the Labour party has called on him to speak out publicly. Public sector pensions Public services policy Andrew Lansley Danny Alexander Liberal-Conservative coalition Conservatives Liberal Democrats guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Where is the best place for a retired battleship to spend the rest of its days as an off-duty vessel? For the US Navy, the answer is sometimes the bottom of the ocean, where the ships can become artificial reef habitats for fish—not to mention popular tourist attractions. But…
Continue reading …If you were waiting with bated breath for John Boehner to announce a new deal framework today in an effort to avert panic in the Asian markets and stop the US from defaulting … tough luck. Boehner spoke with House Republicans on a conference call this afternoon, and word is the…
Continue reading …