Lost star Matthew Fox apparently had a crazy Saturday night: TMZ reports that he was detained by cops outside an Ohio bar after allegedly assaulting a female bus driver. It all started when Fox attempted to board the party bus she was driving, though he wasn’t a guest. Heather Bormann…
Continue reading …President Obama is set to nominate Princeton labor economist Alan Krueger as his top economic adviser. Krueger, who helped lead the Treasury Department through Obama’s first two years in office, would become the chair of the Council of Economic Advisers. In the position, he’d likely urge government action on job…
Continue reading …Michele Bachmann is the latest candidate to make the risky political move of “attributing political motive to natural disasters,” as Alexander Burns writes for Politico . The St. Petersburg Times reports that this weekend at a campaign event in Florida, while praising the Tea Party for its focus on government spending…
Continue reading …Washington weighs up backing huge Daimer Bhasha project as a means of improving battered relations with Pakistan The US is considering financial support for a $12bn dam in Pakistan in an attempt to improve its battered image in the country. The Daimer Bhasha dam would provide enough electricity to end Pakistan’s crippling shortages. It is said its reservoir would hold so much water it could have averted last year’s devastating floods. Washington has not yet made a final decision on partial funding of the dam, but US money would be crucial in securing other international finance, especially from the Asian Development Bank. “Getting involved in a long-term project like this is very compelling for us,” said a senior US official. “This is the project we’re spending our time assessing. “This would demonstrate that Pakistan is the kind of country where you can do large, complex infrastructure projects. It’s not all flood relief and sacks of flour.” At the end of last week, President Asif Ali Zardari met a team from the Asian Development Bank “to start the process of financing Daimer Bhasha dam as the project has been approved at all internal fora of the country”, according to a statement from his office. Although Washington is Pakistan’s biggest international donor by far, the support has done little to improve perceptions of the US, which is seen as the enemy by many Pakistanis – a view exacerbated by continuing drone attacks in tribal areas and the killing of Osama bin Laden earlier this year. The dam, which harks back to similar projects supported by Washington in the 1960s and 1970s, could help reset relations between the two countries. India is likely to object to US support for the dam, as it is located in the disputed Kashmir region. Opposition may also come from critics in the US Congress, who have called for all aid to be cut off after Bin Laden was found hiding in Pakistan. The dam, on the Indus river, would provide 4,500MW of cheap, green energy, making up for a shortfall causing up to 12 hours of power cuts a day across Pakistan. The reservoir would be 50 miles long. Shakil Durrani, chairman of the water and power development authority, said Islamabad had approved the dam project and he was confident of US backing. “If we had a reservoir the size of Daimer Bhasha the floods last summer would not have occurred,” he said. “This would be the largest project ever undertaken in Pakistan. It is our top priority.” Analyst Mosharraf Zaidi agreed the
Continue reading …Washington weighs up backing huge Daimer Bhasha project as a means of improving battered relations with Pakistan The US is considering financial support for a $12bn dam in Pakistan in an attempt to improve its battered image in the country. The Daimer Bhasha dam would provide enough electricity to end Pakistan’s crippling shortages. It is said its reservoir would hold so much water it could have averted last year’s devastating floods. Washington has not yet made a final decision on partial funding of the dam, but US money would be crucial in securing other international finance, especially from the Asian Development Bank. “Getting involved in a long-term project like this is very compelling for us,” said a senior US official. “This is the project we’re spending our time assessing. “This would demonstrate that Pakistan is the kind of country where you can do large, complex infrastructure projects. It’s not all flood relief and sacks of flour.” At the end of last week, President Asif Ali Zardari met a team from the Asian Development Bank “to start the process of financing Daimer Bhasha dam as the project has been approved at all internal fora of the country”, according to a statement from his office. Although Washington is Pakistan’s biggest international donor by far, the support has done little to improve perceptions of the US, which is seen as the enemy by many Pakistanis – a view exacerbated by continuing drone attacks in tribal areas and the killing of Osama bin Laden earlier this year. The dam, which harks back to similar projects supported by Washington in the 1960s and 1970s, could help reset relations between the two countries. India is likely to object to US support for the dam, as it is located in the disputed Kashmir region. Opposition may also come from critics in the US Congress, who have called for all aid to be cut off after Bin Laden was found hiding in Pakistan. The dam, on the Indus river, would provide 4,500MW of cheap, green energy, making up for a shortfall causing up to 12 hours of power cuts a day across Pakistan. The reservoir would be 50 miles long. Shakil Durrani, chairman of the water and power development authority, said Islamabad had approved the dam project and he was confident of US backing. “If we had a reservoir the size of Daimer Bhasha the floods last summer would not have occurred,” he said. “This would be the largest project ever undertaken in Pakistan. It is our top priority.” Analyst Mosharraf Zaidi agreed the
Continue reading …Someone in the Afghan presidential palace intentionally leaked the news that the US was negotiating with the Taliban, scuttling the talks and sending the US contact into hiding, sources tell the AP . Hamid Karzai didn’t trust the US and feared any deal between it and the Taliban would diminish his…
Continue reading …Five months before invasion, pair agreed to go ahead if weapons breach was revealed, according to newly released letter Britain and the US were planning to take action against Saddam Hussein without a second UN resolution five months before the invasion of Iraq, a newly released letter from Tony Blair’s office shows. A letter from Blair’s private secretary reveals that “we and the US would take action” without a new resolution by the UN security council if UN weapons inspectors showed Saddam had clearly breached an earlier resolution. In that case, he “would not have a second chance”. That was the only way Britain could persuade the Bush administration to agree to a role for the UN and continuing work by UN weapons inspectors, the letter says. Dated 17 October 2002, it was written by Matthew Rycroft to Mark Sedwill, private secretary to the foreign secretary, Jack Straw. “This letter is sensitive,” Rycroft underlined. “It must be seen only by those with a real need to know its contents, and must not be copied further.” He sent it to a number of other senior officials, including Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain’s ambassador to the UN. There is no indication that it was seen by Lord Goldsmith, the attorney general, who at the time was advising that invading Iraq without a fresh UN resolution would be illegal. Rycroft’s letter referred to a Downing Street meeting on the Iraqi crisis attended by Straw, the defence secretary, Geoff Hoon, and the chief of the defence staff, Admiral Sir Mike Boyce. Also present were Blair’s chief of staff, Jonathan Powell; his director of government relations, Sally Morgan; his director of communications, Alastair Campbell; and his chief foreign policy adviser, David Manning. The meeting concluded, wrote Rycroft, that “the only way to keep the US on the UN route was for there to be a clear understanding that if [chief UN weapons inspector Hans] Blix reported an Iraqi breach of the first resolution, then Saddam would not have a second chance”. In a devastating passage, Rycroft added: “In other words, if for some reason [such as a French or Russian veto] there were no second resolution agreed … we and the US would take action.” The Downing Street letter is particularly significant considering the government’s repeated emphasis in public at the time on the need for UN approval before any invasion of Iraq. The first resolution referred to in Rycroft’s letter was number 1441, passed unanimously in November 2002. Goldsmith and most of the government’s legal advisers insisted a second UN resolution was needed before military action could lawfully take place. Blair was put in an even more difficult position with Washington as, in the event, Blix never reported an unconditional breach of the first resolution. The Rycroft letter also appears to conflict with Straw’s actions at the time. A statement recently released by the Chilcot inquiry revealed that in October 2002 Straw told his French counterpart, Dominique de Villepin, that US acceptance of the wording of the first UN resolution “implied” a further one was required. The statement was written by Sir Michael Wood, the Foreign Office’s top legal adviser, who also opposed the invasion. It also disclosed that Greenstock had told his US counterpart that Britain would state publicly after the resolution was passed “that there needed to be a second resolution”. The issue is at the heart of the deep and continuing arguments over the legality of the invasion. Goldsmith originally advised Blair and Straw that the first UN resolution did not provide sufficient legal cover for war. Goldsmith said he changed his mind in February 2003 after Bush’s legal advisers told him on a US visit that they had agreed to the wording of 1441 only because it had not crossed their “red line” – the clear message was that, as far as the US was concerned, no new resolution was needed. Philippe Sands, professor of international law at University College London, said: “The letter of 17 October 2002 is consistent with the conclusion that the prime minister wanted to proceed to action with the US on the basis of a single security council resolution, irrespective of what the law required, and ignoring the views at the time of the Foreign Office legal adviser and the attorney general.” According to Wood’s statement to the Chilcot inquiry, Straw told the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, “that we needed a second resolution and that it was extremely unlikely we could find a legal basis without it”. Sands said: “It reflects the widespread view that what became UNSCR 1441 would not authorise military action without a second resolution. His latest statement shoots a very big hole in the arguments of Messrs Goldsmith and Straw, and one wonders why they ultimately failed to reflect its contents in their words and actions.” Tony Blair Iraq war inquiry Foreign policy US foreign policy Iraq Middle East George Bush United States Chris Ames Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cash for Conservative project fast-tracked to charity which was sole bidder for the work, part of the ‘big society’ agenda The controversial Tory initiative to set up free schools received fast-track public funding after fierce lobbying from Michael Gove’s inner circle of advisers, according to leaked emails. Civil servants were urged that the New Schools Network (NSN) – a charity providing advice and guidance to set up the schools – should be given “cash without delay”, in a disclosure which will heighten concern over the government’s lack of transparency about the wider free schools programme. The charity, which is headed by a former Gove adviser, was subsequently given a £500,000 grant. No other organisation was invited to bid for the work. The award was made after an email from Dominic Cummings, a Tory strategist and confidant of Gove, called for: “MG telling the civil servants to find a way to give NSN cash without delay.” Cummings went on to work for the charity on a freelance basis. Sent after the election last May, his message goes on to say: “Labour has handed hundreds of millions to leftie orgs – if u guys cant navigate this thro the bureauc then not a chance of any new schools starting!!” The existence of the email can be revealed as the first 24 free schools prepare to open their doors to pupils. The first wave of free schools includes one which has the journalist Toby Young as its chair of governors, two Jewish faith schools, a Hindu school and a Sikh school. At least three of the schools – Discovery new school in West Sussex, St Luke’s in north London, and Canary Wharf college – will have a Christian ethos. The Maharishi school in Lancashire, which was founded by the Beatles’ guru Maharish Mahesh Yogi and teaches children to meditate, has become a state school as part of the programme. The schools will be the most prominent part of the Tories’ “big society” vision, although in many cases faith organisations, education companies or existing academy sponsors have taken the lead rather than groups of parents or teachers. The government has declined to reveal the costs of funding individual free schools but estimates the overall budget for buildings at between £110m to £130m. It has also declined requests under the Freedom of Information Act to identify the groups applying to open free schools next year. In the email Cummings sets out a timetable for the creation of free schools. He outlines a list of demands – from a “legislative/regulatory timetable” to a “big early july conference with hundreds coming (paid for by dcsf)”. Legislation to enable the creation of free schools was pushed through parliament last summer under procedures usually reserved for counter-terrorism measures. The government held a free schools conference – which David Cameron addressed by videolink – in January. The message was addressed to Gove; his senior policy adviser Sam Freedman; Rachel Wolf, who heads the NSN; and Gove’s special adviser Henry de Zoete. Lisa Nandy, a Labour member of the education select committee, said: “This is definitive proof that this was a way of diverting taxpayers’ money to pay for a political agenda, at a time when the government was making huge spending cuts. Just shortly after that grant was announced they cancelled Building Schools for the Future – it’s pretty shocking. “This confirms what many suspected, that there is a political agenda behind the decision to hand over the money to the New Schools Network. Gove has serious questions to answer – this message is addressed to him, the money was handed over shortly afterwards in a fog of confusion.” A further leaked email reveals the blurred boundaries which existed between Gove’s team and the New Schools Network. In the email, Wolf is asked by one of Gove’s staff to provide the prime minister with a “line to take” after a Tory councillor in Birmingham raised concerns that a free school in his city had the potential to be “socially divisive and undermine … community cohesion”. Wolf worked as a special adviser to Gove while he was shadow education secretary. On its website, the New Schools Network describes itself as an “independent charity” which has been given a government grant to act as the first point of contact with free school proposers. Nandy said the email indicated that the NSN had been given public money to act as “a propaganda machine for a political agenda”. “What they are asking for is a way to play down the negative impact of free schools. They gave this contract to the New Schools Network to provide independent, impartial advice to people setting up free schools. That should surely include advice on the downside of setting up new schools, not just the positive. They were given taxpayers’ money in order to act as a propaganda machine for a political agenda.” The email from Cummings gives an indication of the attitude towards the civil service by those around Gove. He writes that: “There needs to be an announcement soon about indicative timetables for new schools and what is going to be achieved before august. Forcing the conference in july will force the department to focus on it.” Another leaked email exchange indicates that Cummings was closely involved in government work. This email exchange shows that he was invited to a “prep session” ahead of the spending review last October. According to the emails, this involved “posing challenging questions to SoS [Gove] to ensure that his briefing is adequate and to iron out any detailed narrative.” Wolf said that Cummings started work for the NSN as a volunteer at the end of June, and freelanced for them from July to December last year. She said: “He initially volunteered then we hired him as a freelancer paid by the half day. He did various projects – mostly publications, communications and strategy. He averaged about 10 days a month. “We were always extremely clear about what specific jobs he was doing for us. He had a standard freelance contract like the others we hire. Those jobs were not about Michael [Gove] and politics. We hired him because he’s really, really good and we know that he believes in what we’re doing, and he helped us out a lot. “I’m confident we didn’t do anything that was inappropriate. We’re obviously very mindful of our obligations as a charity.” Wolf said the NSN had not received any government funds since mid-July this year and was being financed entirely by donors. Cummings said the NSN has “unique abilities”, and without it there would not have been any free schools this year. “It was no secret that I thought NSN should be funded as fast as possible so that new schools could open as fast as possible – I said the same thing to senior officials many times.” Free schools Michael Gove Education policy Secondary schools Primary schools Jeevan Vasagar guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Petra Ecclestone put most lavish celebrity weddings to shame with her own $7.7 million nuptials this weekend, held at the same Italian castle where Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes got married (for the comparative bargain of just $2 million) in 2006. Ecclestone, 22, is, of course, the daughter of…
Continue reading …The Commerce Department delivered a welcome bit of positive economic news today, reporting that consumer spending shot up 0.8% in July. That’s the metric’s best move in five months, and more or less laps the 0.4% to 0.5% economists had expected, the Wall Street Journal reports. Part…
Continue reading …