Guatemalan judge rules six-year-old girl should be returned to birth mother, but Missouri couple insist adoption was legal The US government is caught up in an emotional legal battle over a six-year-old girl said to have been kidnapped from Guatemala in 2006 and later adopted by an American couple. A Guatemalan court has ordered that Anyelí Liseth Hernández Rodríguez should be returned to the country, after a lengthy fight by the woman who claims to be her birth mother. A judge ruled that if she were not returned within two months Interpol would be asked to intervene. But the American couple, Timothy and Jennifer Monahan, of Kansas City, Missouri, said that, in 2008, they had legally adopted the girl, now known as Karen Abigal Monahan. In an interview with the Guardian, the Guatemalan woman, Loyda Rodríguez Morales, 26, said she did not feel anger towards the American family. “I don’t know if they knew she was stolen. All I would like to say to them is that they return my little girl,” she said. Morales said that in 2006 she had been returning from a supermarket with her three children, two sons and a daughter. “I went into the building with my kids behind me. I went into my flat and then straight away I realised my little girl wasn’t there,” she said. “We looked everywhere but there was no sign of her. People who had seen what happened told us that a woman took her and went off in a taxi that was waiting.” She said she and her husband, a construction worker, went to the police, put up posters round the neighbourhood and visited orphanages, but without success. With the help of the human rights group Survivors Foundation, Morales found her daughter on the files of an adoption agency, listed as being in an orphanage in March 2009. But it was too late: according to court records, Anyelí had left the country in December the previous year. Morales said: “All I want is to be with my daughter again. It has been almost five years and that is what I want. It has been very hard, like very hard blows to the heart.” She rejected some people’s suggestions that her daughter would be “better off” in the US. “I can give my children a good life with the affection and love that they need. We live off what my husband earns and are OK. I will do all I can to see they have a good life.” The Monahans have issued a statement through a Washington-based public relations firm, Peter Mirijanian Public Affairs, which indicated that they would not give the child up without a fight. It said they would continue to seek the safety and best interests of “their legally adopted child”, adding: “They remain committed to protecting their daughter from additional trauma as they pursue the truth of her past through appropriate legal channels.” The couple taped a message to their door asking reporters to respect their privacy at a “difficult and confusing time”. The case has provoked strong opinions within Guatemala and the US, with sympathies split, some saying that any “kidnapped child” should be returned, and others thinking that the child, after a period of four years and knowing little of life other than that in the US, would be harmed by being wrenched from her adoptive family. The situation poses a dilemma for the US government, caught between its international legal obligations to comply with the Guatemalan court order and its concern for the American couple and child, who is now a US citizen. Morales is reported have taken a DNA test, which established her as the biological mother, but the US could ask for that to be repeated and also challenge other aspects of the case, in court in Guatemala. The US government is likely to ask the child herself if she wants to return to Guatemala; it would be reluctant to force a US citizen to leave. Agencies dealing with adoption cases, such as the US-based National Council for Adoption, said they could not recall an incident where the government faced such an order from a foreign court. Chuck Johnson, president of the National Council for Adoption, expressed sympathy for the biological mother, the adoptive parents and Anyelí. “This is a no-win situation,” he said. A US justice department spokeswoman, Alisa Finelli, refused to comment of whether steps were being taken to send the child back to Guatemala. “The department declines to comment,” said Finelli. Guatemala United States Adoption Children Jo Tuckman Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Guatemalan judge rules six-year-old girl should be returned to birth mother, but Missouri couple insist adoption was legal The US government is caught up in an emotional legal battle over a six-year-old girl said to have been kidnapped from Guatemala in 2006 and later adopted by an American couple. A Guatemalan court has ordered that Anyelí Liseth Hernández Rodríguez should be returned to the country, after a lengthy fight by the woman who claims to be her birth mother. A judge ruled that if she were not returned within two months Interpol would be asked to intervene. But the American couple, Timothy and Jennifer Monahan, of Kansas City, Missouri, said that, in 2008, they had legally adopted the girl, now known as Karen Abigal Monahan. In an interview with the Guardian, the Guatemalan woman, Loyda Rodríguez Morales, 26, said she did not feel anger towards the American family. “I don’t know if they knew she was stolen. All I would like to say to them is that they return my little girl,” she said. Morales said that in 2006 she had been returning from a supermarket with her three children, two sons and a daughter. “I went into the building with my kids behind me. I went into my flat and then straight away I realised my little girl wasn’t there,” she said. “We looked everywhere but there was no sign of her. People who had seen what happened told us that a woman took her and went off in a taxi that was waiting.” She said she and her husband, a construction worker, went to the police, put up posters round the neighbourhood and visited orphanages, but without success. With the help of the human rights group Survivors Foundation, Morales found her daughter on the files of an adoption agency, listed as being in an orphanage in March 2009. But it was too late: according to court records, Anyelí had left the country in December the previous year. Morales said: “All I want is to be with my daughter again. It has been almost five years and that is what I want. It has been very hard, like very hard blows to the heart.” She rejected some people’s suggestions that her daughter would be “better off” in the US. “I can give my children a good life with the affection and love that they need. We live off what my husband earns and are OK. I will do all I can to see they have a good life.” The Monahans have issued a statement through a Washington-based public relations firm, Peter Mirijanian Public Affairs, which indicated that they would not give the child up without a fight. It said they would continue to seek the safety and best interests of “their legally adopted child”, adding: “They remain committed to protecting their daughter from additional trauma as they pursue the truth of her past through appropriate legal channels.” The couple taped a message to their door asking reporters to respect their privacy at a “difficult and confusing time”. The case has provoked strong opinions within Guatemala and the US, with sympathies split, some saying that any “kidnapped child” should be returned, and others thinking that the child, after a period of four years and knowing little of life other than that in the US, would be harmed by being wrenched from her adoptive family. The situation poses a dilemma for the US government, caught between its international legal obligations to comply with the Guatemalan court order and its concern for the American couple and child, who is now a US citizen. Morales is reported have taken a DNA test, which established her as the biological mother, but the US could ask for that to be repeated and also challenge other aspects of the case, in court in Guatemala. The US government is likely to ask the child herself if she wants to return to Guatemala; it would be reluctant to force a US citizen to leave. Agencies dealing with adoption cases, such as the US-based National Council for Adoption, said they could not recall an incident where the government faced such an order from a foreign court. Chuck Johnson, president of the National Council for Adoption, expressed sympathy for the biological mother, the adoptive parents and Anyelí. “This is a no-win situation,” he said. A US justice department spokeswoman, Alisa Finelli, refused to comment of whether steps were being taken to send the child back to Guatemala. “The department declines to comment,” said Finelli. Guatemala United States Adoption Children Jo Tuckman Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …As the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks approaches, the White House has issued guidelines for public commemorations and official statements to government officials both in the US and abroad. The domestic guidelines are much shorter than those issued overseas, including to American embassies and consulates worldwide, the New York…
Continue reading …Michele Bachmann likes to talk to crowds about “the creator of the universe, our Lord and savior, Jesus Christ.” Yet for some reason, some Jewish donors think she’s … Jewish. And what may be good for her campaign coffers is bad news for Romney’s, according to the New York Post . The…
Continue reading …Angelina Jolie got the flu, was quarantined for two days in an attic in France, and wrote her first script, a film about the Bosnian war . Brad Pitt’s reaction when she gave it to him: “You know, honey, it’s not that bad,” she tells Vanity Fair . She ended up also…
Continue reading …How much does it cost to purchase 0.3% of Iceland? About $8.8 million, learned one Chinese tycoon who plans to do just that. Huang Nubo has made a provisional deal to buy 115 square miles of wilderness in the northeastern part of the country, which the real estate…
Continue reading …Names passed to Steve Coogan by private investigator Glenn Mulcaire will not be disclosed after Scotland Yard intervention The names of several News of the World journalists who ordered a private detective to hack into mobile phones belonging to six public figures will not be publicly disclosed after Scotland Yard intervened to prevent their publication. The names were passed to Steve Coogan on Friday by Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator who worked for the paper, in compliance with a high court order the actor obtained earlier this year. The names are critical to the phone-hacking investigation because they could show how far the practice was widespread at the paper, which was closed down by Rupert Murdoch last month, despite consistent denials from its owner News Group Newspapers. Coogan is one of several celebrities suing the paper for breach of privacy. The high court order instructed Mulcaire to reveal who at the paper asked him to illegally intercept messages left on mobile belonging to former model Elle Macpherson, publicist Max Clifford and four others. Mulcaire, who was employed exclusively by the News of the World, was also told to reveal who at the paper ordered him to target Liberal Democrat MP Simon Hughes, PFA chief executive Gordon Taylor, his colleague Jo Armstrong and football agent Sky Andrew. He was refused leave to appeal against the order earlier this month and handed over the names on Friday, the deadline set by the high court for making the information available. Law firm Schillings was contacted by Mulcaire’s solicitor Sarah Webb of Payne Hicks Beach on Friday and asked not to make the names public. Webb said: “The issues of confidentiality are of concern to the Metropolitan police and we asked Coogan’s solicitors not to disclose the information until the Met could consider the matter.” She added: “The issue is not that my client requires to keep matters confidential but rather that the police require him to. We were concerned that our [client] did not breach orders of the court in this respect. The Met are now dealing [with this] and there is nothing more I can add.” Similar high court orders have contained restrictions on publishing the names of News of the World journalists on the grounds that doing so could compromise Operation Wheeting, Scotland Yard’s ongoing investigation into phone hacking, by tipping off potential suspects. Scotland Yard had not responded to requests for a comment by the time of publication. There is some confusion over whether the order obtained by Coogan allows the names to be released, however. Sources close to the actor insisted they can be identified. News Group’s parent company News International refused to comment. Mulcaire is also taking legal action against News International after it stopped paying his legal fees in July, claiming the company is contractually obliged to do so. Meanwhile, Coogan has also won a separate high court order to force Mulcaire to name the News of the World executives who ordered Mulcaire to hack into his own phone. Mulcaire is appealing against that order on the grounds that he would incriminate himself by complying with it because he would be confessing to a crime he has not been charged with or admitted to. Crucially, that defence is not available to him as regards Max Clifford, Elle Macpherson and the others, because Mulcaire already pleaded guilty to illegally intercepting messages left on their mobiles in the original 2007 phone-hacking court case, which resulted in his imprisonment. Mulcaire was jailed in January of that year along with the News of the World’s former royal editor Clive Goodman. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . Phone hacking News of the World Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Glenn Mulcaire Metropolitan police James Robinson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Majority of 88 detainees who have died since start of uprising against regime said to have been tortured At least 88 people, including 10 children, have died in detention in Syria since the uprising against the regime began in March in what amounts to “systematic persecution on a vast scale”, according to Amnesty International. The majority of victims were tortured or ill-treated, with injuries ranging from beatings, burns and blunt-force traumas to whipping marks, electrocution, slashes and mutilated genitals. Amnesty documented the names, dates and places of arrest of victims, while independent forensic pathologists have established possible causes of death in some cases by examining film of the bodies. Amnesty’s report was released as at least seven people were killed when thousands protested outside mosques following prayers to mark the end of the holy month of Ramadan. A 13-year-old boy was among those killed when government forces opened fire in the southern province of Deraa. There were further deaths and injuries in the capital Damascus and the city of Homs, where people poured on to the streets to demand the removal of President Bashar al-Assad in defiance of tanks and troops, witnesses said. Syrian state television showed Assad attending prayers at a mosque in Damascus. In mounting pressure on the regime, the US expanded sanctions to three “principal defenders of the regime” including presidential adviser Bouthaina Shaaban and foreign minister Walid al-Muallem, both of whom had been part of the pro-reform wing of the regime. At least 2,200 people have been killed since the start of the uprising, according to the UN, as Syrian forces have sought to crush the rebellion, part of the revolutionary wave sweeping across the Arab world. The crackdown against protesters has intensified during Ramadan. Amnesty said those who died in custody over the last few months are believed to have been detained because they took part in protests, or were suspected of involvement in them. The dead included Hamza al-Khateeb, a 13-year-old boy detained at the end of April in Deraa. His death sparked widespread outrage and protests after the corpse was returned to his family bearing evidence of severe torture, including a severed penis. Video of 45 bodies of detainees, taken by family members or activists after they were returned to relatives or dumped on the roadside, was obtained by Amnesty and passed to forensic pathologists. The injuries of Sakher Hallak, a 42-year-old doctor and father of two from Aleppo whose body was dumped days after his arrest on May 25, included broken ribs, arms and fingers, mutilated genitals and gouged eyes, Amnesty said. His brother Hazem, a US-based doctor, told the Guardian Sakher had not been protesting but signed a statement calling on the authorities to end the violence against protesters and allow doctors to treat the injured. Human rights groups and local doctors say medical staff have been prevented from treating injured protesters. “We think he was singled out because of this and also because he visited me in the US for three weeks,” Hazem Hallak said. “I think the authorities were very paranoid about his visit.” A video clip of the body of Tariq Ziad Abd al-Qadr from Homs shows patches of missing hair, marks to the neck and penis possibly caused by electric shocks, whipping marks, stab wounds and burns, Amnesty said. There was evidence of torture or ill-treatment in at least 52 of the 88 cases, according to the report. The death rate shows a significant escalation from previous rates of death in custody, typically five per year. Deaths involving torture appear to have increased in recent weeks, according to Amnesty’s Syria researcher Neil Sammonds and Damascus-based human rights lawyer Razan Zeitouneh. After a peak in and around Homs – where 40 of the 88 cases came from – new instances are reported on a daily basis. “These deaths behind bars are reaching massive proportions and appear to [show] the same brutal disdain for life that we are seeing daily on the streets of Syria,” said Sammonds. “The accounts of torture we have received are horrific. We believe the Syrian government to be systematically persecuting its own people on a vast scale. “In the context of the widespread and systematic violations taking place in Syria, we believe that these deaths in custody may include crimes against humanity.” Human Rights Watch is also verifying 70 reports of deaths in custody. “There is no doubt that people have died in detention because of torture and other ill-treatment like lack of proper medical care,” Nadim Houry, a researcher in Beirut, said. According to one activists’ group, at least 551 Syrian civilians have been killed during Ramadan, which ends with the festival of Eid al-Fitr. A local network of activists said Syrians were keeping Eid celebrations to a minimum this year out of respect for the families of those who had been killed or are in detention. “There will be no happiness while the martyrs’ blood is still warm,” it said in a statement In protests in Harasta, a suburb of Damascus, protesters shouted: “The people want the downfall of the president.” In neighbouring Saqba, crowds held shoes in the air as an insult to the president. Nour Ali is the pseudonym for a journalist based in Damascus Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Amnesty International Torture Middle East Nour Ali guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Lady Gaga’s performance at the MTV Video Music Awards as her male alter ego, Jo Calderone , was totally original—right? Not so much, according to Kelly Osbourne and other Twitter users, who quickly picked up on the fact that Annie Lennox also performed in very similar-looking drag at the Grammy…
Continue reading …A 15-year-old from Syracuse, Anthony Stewart, was sentenced to 2 to 6 years in a juvenile detention facility by Judge William Walsh of Onandaga County for a robbery in which the teenager took a mere 7 cents. Walsh said he issued the harsh sentence because Stewart declined to plead guilty, choosing to fight the charges.
Continue reading …