Iftikhar and Farzana Ahmed will appear in court on Friday, charged with the murder of their daughter The parents of Shafilea Ahmed, the victim of a suspected “honour killing” almost eight years ago, have been charged with murder and appeared before magistrates on Wednesday. Ahmed, 17, disappeared from her home town of Warrington, Cheshire, in September 2003. Her badly decomposed remains were found in February 2004 on the banks of the River Kent in Cumbria, following a flood. She was an intelligent young woman who had hoped to study law at university and become a solicitor. Her inquest heard that the most likely cause of death was strangulation or suffocation. Police said Iftikhar Ahmed, 51, a taxi driver, and Farzana Ahmed, 48, a housewife, of Liverpool Road, Warrington, were arrested on suspicion of murder in September 2010. Cheshire police have now charged both with murder following authorisation by the Crown Prosecution Service. The couple made a six-minute appearance at Halton magistrates’ court in Runcorn, Cheshire, on Wednesday afternoon. They were remanded in custody until Friday, when they will appear via videolink at Manchester crown court. They spoke only to confirm through an interpreter their names, ages and address. The murder charge was put to them, but no plea was entered. There were no submissions made by the prosecution or defence solicitors. The court heard that the couple were charged with murdering the teenager on 11 September 2003 in Cheshire. Iftikhar Ahmed, wearing an open-necked white shirt, gave family members a thumbs-up as he was taken down from the dock. His wife, who spoke through an interpreter, was on the verge of tears. During the hearing Mrs Ahmed stood with her head to one side, and wiped her nose. As she left the dock she signalled to members of her family in the public gallery with a raised finger. At the inquest into Shafilea’s death, Ian Smith, the coroner for south and east Cumbria, recorded a verdict of unlawful killing. The couple have always strenuously denied any involvement in their daughter’s death and once stormed into a police press conference to tearfully protest their innocence, claiming the police were racially motivated. But at the inquest, evidence was heard that Shafilea claimed she was held down and beaten by her parents and was fearful of an arranged marriage. The coroner ruled that she had been the victim of a “very vile murder”. She disappeared shortly after a trip to Pakistan in which she was introduced to a potential suitor. During the trip, she drank bleach and harmed herself in an apparent cry for help, and needed regular hospital treatment to correct injuries to her throat. The coroner said: “Shafilea was the victim of a very vile murder and there’s no evidence before the court as to who did it. There are things people know that have not been told to this court.” He said Shafilea had not had justice. “Her ambition was to live her own life in her own way: to study, to follow a career in the law and to do what she wanted to do. These are just basic fundamental rights and they were denied to her.” Mrs Ahmed was remanded to Styal prison in Cheshire and her husband was remanded to Liverpool prison. The couple were initially arrested on suspicion of kidnapping their daughter in December 2003 but in June 2004 were released without charge when the Crown Prosecution Service ruled there was insufficient evidence against them. Crime Helen Carter guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Iftikhar and Farzana Ahmed will appear in court on Friday, charged with the murder of their daughter The parents of Shafilea Ahmed, the victim of a suspected “honour killing” almost eight years ago, have been charged with murder and appeared before magistrates on Wednesday. Ahmed, 17, disappeared from her home town of Warrington, Cheshire, in September 2003. Her badly decomposed remains were found in February 2004 on the banks of the River Kent in Cumbria, following a flood. She was an intelligent young woman who had hoped to study law at university and become a solicitor. Her inquest heard that the most likely cause of death was strangulation or suffocation. Police said Iftikhar Ahmed, 51, a taxi driver, and Farzana Ahmed, 48, a housewife, of Liverpool Road, Warrington, were arrested on suspicion of murder in September 2010. Cheshire police have now charged both with murder following authorisation by the Crown Prosecution Service. The couple made a six-minute appearance at Halton magistrates’ court in Runcorn, Cheshire, on Wednesday afternoon. They were remanded in custody until Friday, when they will appear via videolink at Manchester crown court. They spoke only to confirm through an interpreter their names, ages and address. The murder charge was put to them, but no plea was entered. There were no submissions made by the prosecution or defence solicitors. The court heard that the couple were charged with murdering the teenager on 11 September 2003 in Cheshire. Iftikhar Ahmed, wearing an open-necked white shirt, gave family members a thumbs-up as he was taken down from the dock. His wife, who spoke through an interpreter, was on the verge of tears. During the hearing Mrs Ahmed stood with her head to one side, and wiped her nose. As she left the dock she signalled to members of her family in the public gallery with a raised finger. At the inquest into Shafilea’s death, Ian Smith, the coroner for south and east Cumbria, recorded a verdict of unlawful killing. The couple have always strenuously denied any involvement in their daughter’s death and once stormed into a police press conference to tearfully protest their innocence, claiming the police were racially motivated. But at the inquest, evidence was heard that Shafilea claimed she was held down and beaten by her parents and was fearful of an arranged marriage. The coroner ruled that she had been the victim of a “very vile murder”. She disappeared shortly after a trip to Pakistan in which she was introduced to a potential suitor. During the trip, she drank bleach and harmed herself in an apparent cry for help, and needed regular hospital treatment to correct injuries to her throat. The coroner said: “Shafilea was the victim of a very vile murder and there’s no evidence before the court as to who did it. There are things people know that have not been told to this court.” He said Shafilea had not had justice. “Her ambition was to live her own life in her own way: to study, to follow a career in the law and to do what she wanted to do. These are just basic fundamental rights and they were denied to her.” Mrs Ahmed was remanded to Styal prison in Cheshire and her husband was remanded to Liverpool prison. The couple were initially arrested on suspicion of kidnapping their daughter in December 2003 but in June 2004 were released without charge when the Crown Prosecution Service ruled there was insufficient evidence against them. Crime Helen Carter guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A freak dolphin collision at an Illinois aquarium killed a young female, reports ABC News . Trainers did not see what happened, but say the dolphins were playing when they heard a “pop” just before an afternoon show earlier this week. They rushed the 4-year-old bottlenose dolphin into a medical pool,…
Continue reading …Plane headed to Manchester carrying 347 passengers makes emergency landing in Turkey after email bomb warning A UK-bound plane has been forced to land in Turkey after a Pakistani airline received bomb threats by email. The plane was travelling to Manchester airport on Wednesday afternoon when officials in Islamabad received the terror warning, a Pakistani International Airlines chief said. All 347 passengers were safe as bomb disposal teams carried out searches on the grounded PK709 jet in Istanbul, he added. A total of 323 economy passengers, 24 first class passengers and 16 crew were ushered off the plane as sniffer dogs carried out searches at Istanbul’s Ataturk airport, Captain Tasneem Mozaffar, head of global operations for the airline, said. A plane due to land in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, has also been forced to land while security officials carried out checks, he said. “When you have 500 people in the air you have to take the safest option,” he said. “We received information in a written email of a bomb threat on the two flights. “We asked the UK-bound flight to turn left and land in Turkey as that was the nearest available place to safely land.” Manchester airport confirmed it had been told of the incident regarding the flight, which had taken off from Lahore. A spokesman said: “I can confirm that flight PK709 travelling to Manchester from Lahore, which was due to land at 4.10pm, has been diverted to Istanbul. “We have yet to receive detailed information as to why the plane landed in Turkey and we are awaiting updates as to when the plane will take off again for Manchester.” The scare came amid a heightened state of alert for airlines in the build-up to memorials to mark 10 years since the September 11 terror attacks. Global terrorism UK security and terrorism Pakistan Air transport Turkey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Eight contenders to share platform in California, with nomination shaping up as two-horse race between Perry and Mitt Romney Eight Republican candidates line up tonight for the first in a series of debates that will help define the party’s nomination battle to take on Barack Obama next year for the White House. The main focus of the debate at the Ronald Reagan Library in the Simi Valley, near Los Angeles, will be on whether Texas governor Rick Perry, who only entered the race last month, can consolidate his frontrunner status. Tom Mann, a political analyst at the Brookings Institution, said: “It is interesting because of Rick Perry, and the fact that he has sky-rocketed to the lead in the Republican field without many people having a firm hold on him, just some impressions.” In spite of eight on the platform in the debate, the nomination is already shaping up as a two-horse race between Perry and Mitt Romney, according to the polls, with Michele Bachmann trailing in third place along with outsider Ron Paul. Mann said Perry’s record of speeches and writing leaves him vulnerable. He said: “The question is whether Romney can show some signs of life and put himself back into the thick of the race. Everything else is beside the point. There are no other plausible candidates for the nomination. The others are just window-dressing on the side.” Job creation will be one of the dominant issues in the debate, which comes the day before Obama’s speech to a joint session of Congress in which he will propose a job stimulus package that that will cost $300 billion to cut taxes, help state governments and pay for the building or rebuilding of roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects. To appease Republicans, Obama will propose the $300 billion in spending will be matched by $300 billion in cuts elsewhere. Perry received a pre-debate boost this morning when the Wall Street Journal, whose opinion pages remain a bastion of conservatism, offered a damning verdict on a jobs plan put forward on Tuesday by Romney, a relative moderate compared to almost all the rest of the field. The Journal, in an editorial, described Romney’s 59-point jobs plan, which proposes modest tax cuts and a reduction in federal government regulations, as “surprisingly timid and tactical considering our economic predicament”, and lambasted him for proposing a trade war with China. It added: “The biggest rap on Mr Romney as a potential president is that it’s hard to discern any core beliefs beyond faith in his own managerial expertise.” The Journal editorial followed criticism by Perry’s campaign of the Romney plan. Perry’s team said Romney, while governor of Massachusetts, failed to put into practice many of the reforms he now claims to support. The debate kicks off months of intensive campaigning, with the candidates making frequent trips to Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina, who are scheduled to hold the first of the nomination caucuses and primaries in February. Perry’s rapid rise would be halted if he comes across in the debate as too smug, or if his Texas accent reminds voters too much of George Bush, or if he makes a gaffe, as he did last month suggesting that the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, would be treated “pretty ugly” if he came to Texas, or even his hint in 2009 that he supported Texas seceding from the union. Political analysts such as Norm Ornstein, a non-partisan commentator who works at the right-wing think-tank the American Enterprise Institute, note that Perry is also vulnerable on policy issues, such as social security. Perry recently reassured those receiving social security that, if he were president, their benefits would be safe, but in one of his books he described social security as unconstitutional. Ornstein said that Perry’s rivals in the debate should be asking him: ‘Were you lying then or are you lying now?’ The dilemma for Perry’s opponents is whether to direct their attacks at him tonight or hold off until later. Personal attacks can backfire, as they did for the former governor of Minnesota, Tim Pawlenty, during the last debate when he turned on Bachmann in a desperate attempt to grab attention. Bachmann won the Republican straw poll in Ames, Iowa, two days later, with Pawlenty performing badly and dropping out of the race. The victory in the Ames poll has been the high point for Bachmann, who has since seen a slump in her fortunes, mainly because of the entry of Perry, who appeals to the same right-wing vote. Others in the debate are: businessman Herman Cain, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former ambassador to China Jon Huntsman and former senator Rick Santorum, all languishing in single figures in the polls, with little chance of winning the nomination. This is the first of at least six debates this autumn, with the next on Monday, in Tampa, Florida. US elections 2012 United States Republicans Rick Perry Michele Bachmann Mitt Romney Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Carnegie Mellon University just scored a big boost, as former steel magnate William Dietrich pledged $265 million to the Pittsburgh-based school, reports AP . With charitable giving down from the economic downturn, Dietrich’s gift is considered one of the largest to a private university in recent years. “It is one of…
Continue reading …A woman raped as a teen who was forced by her church to apologize for her “immorality’ is finally seeing justice served now that her attacker is behind bars. Former church member Ernest Willis, 52, has been sentenced to up to 30 years in prison for the assault on his…
Continue reading …The ice area covering the Arctic is tying a record low this summer, and many scientists think it has reached a new low for volume, reports the Independent . Since researchers began measuring Arctic ice by satellite in 1979, it has steadily shrunk, shrinking some 30% over the past 32 years….
Continue reading …The celebrate what would have been the 65th birthday of the late, great Freddie Mercury, this week, Google unveiled a special doodle and 98-second animated clip all over the world. “To create with Freddie was always stimulating to the max. He was daring, always sensing a way to get outside…
Continue reading …Abortion amendment that bid to strip termination providers of their counselling role crushed as supporters split An attempt to strip abortion providers of their role in counselling women was heavily defeated in the House of Commons this afternoon after a split between the original supporters of the amendment. MPs voted by 368 votes to 118 – a majority of 250 – to reject the amendment by the Tory backbencher Nadine Dorries after she lost the support of her co-sponsor, the former Labour minister Frank Field. Dorries managed to win the support of three cabinet ministers – Iain Duncan Smith, the work and pensions secretary, Liam Fox, the defence secretary, and Owen Paterson, the Northern Ireland secretary. Field withdrew his support for the Dorries amendment after Anne Milton, the health minister, said the government would try to implement the spirit of her proposal. Milton told MPs: “The government is … supportive of the spirit of these amendments and we intend to bring forward proposals for regulations accordingly, but after consultation. Primary legislation is not only unnecessary but would deprive parliament of the opportunity to consider the detail of how this service would develop and evolve.” Dorries hailed Milton’s undertaking as a victory. She told the BBC’s Norman Smith: “We lost the battle but we have won the war.” Milton distanced the government from the amendment towards the end of a stratchy debate in which Dorries said that David Cameron had initially encouraged her. Dorries claimed that the prime minister had advised her on the wording of her amendment by saying that she should describe abortion counsellors as independent. Dorries said: “I went to see the prime minister regarding this amendment and he was very encouraging. In fact it was at the prime minister’s insistence that I inserted the word ‘independent’. I attended a meeting at the department of health and at that meeting it was decided what the outcome, the process that would be implemented, to make this a reality.” The Dorries amendment would have stripped non-statutory abortion providers such as Marie Stopes and Bpas from offering counselling to women. This was designed to provide greater opportunities for independent counsellors, some of whom are influenced by pro-life groups, to provide counselling. NHS abortion providers would still be free to offer counselling. Dorries claimed that the prime minister changed his mind under pressure from Nick Clegg, after the deputy prime minister was lobbied by the former Lib Dem MP Evan Harris. Dorries said: “Basically the Liberal Democrats, in fact a former MP who lost his seat in this place, is blackmailing our prime minister. Our prime minister has been put in an impossible position regarding this amendment. Our health bill has been held to ransom by a former Liberal Democrat MP.” A senior Lib Dem source dismissed her allegation. The source said: “That is utter rubbish. [Nick] doesn’t need Evan to tell him the problems with her amendment.” The defeat was welcomed by Bpas. Ann Furedi, its chief executive, said: “Bpas is pleased to see Nadine Dorries’ amendment so overwhelmingly rejected. We look forward to being able to focus our efforts on the issues which pose a genuine problem for women considering ending a pregnancy.” Dorries insisted that she did not want to restrict access to abortion. “I do not want to return to the days of back street abortionists,” she said. “I am pro-choice. Abortion is here to stay.” The MP said that it was wrong for abortion providers to counsel women with unplanned pregnancies. “It must be wrong that the abortion provider, who is paid to the tune of £60m to carry out terminations, should also provide the counselling if a woman feels strong or brave enough to ask for it. If an organisation is paid that much for abortions, where is the incentive to reduce them?” Diane Abbott, the shadow public health minister, said: “This amendment is a shoddy, ill-conceived attempt to promote non-facts to make a non-case – namely that tens of thousands of women every year are either not getting counselling that they request or are getting counselling that is so poor that only new legislation can remedy the situation. In matters of this kind, if legislation is the answer then you have almost certainly asked the wrong question.” Abortion Health Women Frank Field Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …