Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 2316)
Al-Jazeera’s coverage of Egypt protests may hasten revolution in world news

Al-Jazeera English is enjoying new-found global popularity in the wake of the chaos in Egypt Donald Rumsfeld demonised it and George Bush allegedly said he wanted to bomb it . No one was quite sure whether the then White House incumbent was joking or not, but its offices have been hit by US forces. Twice . Now something rather strange has begun to happen to the Arabic language news broadcaster al-Jazeera and the English language channel it launched nearly five years ago; American viewers have begun to demand it. It is clear some kind of watershed has been reached when the Kansas City Star publishes a cut-out-and-keep guide to the “easiest way to get al-Jazeera English” . The Qatar-based channel’s acclaimed coverage of the Egyptian crisis has been referred to as the broadcaster’s “CNN moment”, doing for al-Jazeera English what the first Gulf war did for CNN, pushing it to the forefront of the public’s consciousness. Put simply, must-see TV. Now the challenge is to translate the plaudits into the major cable or satellite distribution deal the channel has long sought without success in the US. The New York Times, which praised the channel’s “total immersion coverage of news events the whole world is talking about”, bemoaned the fact that US cable viewers were able to watch MTV’s controversial adaptation of E4′s teen drama Skins but not al-Jazeera English. “It seems like a perverse application of free speech,” said the paper . “But sex is sexier than foreign affairs and it certainly sells better.” Intimidation and violence With China investing $7bn in foreign language media , we may also be witnessing the beginning of a shift, albeit slight, in the nature of global TV news and debate. Stephen Claypole, the former senior BBC News and TV news agency executive who is now chairman of the London and Abu Dhabi-based consultancy, DMA Media , says: “Al-Jazeera has the game by the throat, both in Arabic and English, and it has certainly lived up to its reputation as the most watched broadcaster in the Arab world in spite of intimidation and violence against its staff in Egypt. “I have heard that [US secretary of state] Hillary Clinton [pictured] watches it constantly and that Barack Obama has been viewing from the situation room. Although al-Jazeera English has been competent since its launch, it has been waiting for a huge story to call its own. Egypt is certainly that,” Claypole adds. Al-Jazeera English is separate from the main al-Jazeera Arabic channel, which began broadcasting in 1996. Staffed largely by western TV journalists, the English-language service leveraged the advantages of its Arabic network and contacts in covering the emerging crisis. For a story of this scale in the Arab world, it absolutely had to be good. Al Anstey, the former ITN executive who is the managing director of al-Jazeera English, describes it as an “extraordinary week” for the channel and a “truly historical” one for Egypt. “We are being seen worldwide as a channel of reference on this story,” says Anstey. “There has been an exponential increase in the recognition of exactly what it is we do and the quality of our journalism and content. I always say the best way of addressing any misconceptions about al-Jazeera English is to switch on and watch.” Al-Jazeera English is available in around 220m homes in more than 100 countries worldwide, including viewers with Freeview, Sky or Freesat in the UK. But fewer than 3m of those homes are in the US including – helpfully for the White House – Washington DC. The failure to strike a major US distribution deal is partly a result of the political sensitivity that surrounded the perceived negative slant of al-Jazeera Arabic’s coverage of the Iraq war. It is also a reflection of the fact that cable operators do not think they can make money from a foreign news network on systems that are already full. BBC World News is distributed to around 6m homes in the US, against more than 10 times that for the entertainment channel BBC America (on which some World News bulletins air). “For a long time al-Jazeera was seen as the Fox [News] for the bad guys — that’s a really unfortunate way of looking at it,” says Jon Williams, the BBC’s World News editor. “With the change of [US government] administration there’s been a slight change of attitude, and if this means that it does now get carriage in the US, then we welcome that. Al-Jazeera has done some great stuff … It wouldn’t be fair to single out its Egyptian coverage – it has been doing this for a while.” US viewers have been watching the channel by other means – streamed live on YouTube, on set-top box digital video player Roku and on its own website, which reported a traffic increase of 2,500%, with more than half of the upsurge coming from the US. It also gained a valuable window on Link TV, which announced last week it would simulcast around 12 hours a day of al-Jazeera English on its satellite network available nationally on DirecTV and the Dish Network. Blogger and journalism professor Jeff Jarvis said it was a “sad vestige of the era of ‘Freedom Fries’ that the channel was not more widely available on cable, and started a Twitter campaign, #wewantouraje (referencing the line from Dire Straits’ Money For Nothing, but with a twist). “As much of an internet triumphalist as I am, internet streaming is not going to have the same impact — political and education impact — that putting AJE on the cable dial would have,” blogged Jarvis. “It is downright un-American to still refuse to carry it. Vital, world-changing news is occurring in the Middle East and no one — not the xenophobic or celebrity-obsessed or cut-to-the-bone American media — can bring the perspective, insight, and on-the-scene reporting al-Jazeera English can.” Anstey is cautiously optimistic: “I’m confident we will get distribution in the US, it’s just a question of when,” he says. “It’s a very important marketplace for us.” Especially in terms of revenue? “It’s not about the finances of getting into America, it’s about getting the content out there. At this stage of our evolution, the priority for the English channel is about building reputation and reach.” As the broadcaster is bankrolled by the billionaire Emir of Qatar , neither the English nor the Arabic al-Jazeera is under pressure to make a profit any time soon. It has also faced accusations of aligning itself closely to Qatari foreign policy; US embassy cables released by WikiLeaks at the end of last year suggested Qatar was using the Arabic channel as a bargaining chip in foreign policy negotiations with its neighbours. “Never once has Qatar interfered with our editorial,” says Anstey. “It is absolutely not a fair criticism and I can say that with total confidence. We are genuinely independent.” The English channel’s short history has not been without its problems — the launch was delayed and allegations of discontent among the ranks surfaced three years ago, accompanied by a string of staff defections . Anstey, the station’s former director of media development who was appointed managing director in October, says: “As a startup, where your competitors are very established and very good at what they do, there is going to be rapid evolution. We have gone into the next stage of development and things are much more settled. We are able to refine what we do and expand where we feel appropriate.” As the al-Jazeera channel eyes up further international expansion, funded by its backer’s seemingly bottomless pockets, western news organisations such as the BBC’s World Service are having to sharply cut back , with its shortwave Egyptian service among those facing the axe. Richard Sambrook, the former director of BBC Global News and now global vice-chairman of the PR firm Edelman , says it is part of a wider trend which could have far-reaching implications. “Western journalism and newsgathering, including the international networks, is shrinking as news organisations close bureaux and make staff redundant to cut costs. At the same time, states in other parts of the world are investing in journalism including international coverage and networks — al-Jazeera, Iran’s Press TV … and the Chinese have just invested $7bn in expanding [state news agency] Xinhua and CCTV [China Central Television]. So we may be seeing a shift from western dominated international news to Mid East and Asian dominance in the long run.” Every global media story produces its winners. Egypt’s drawn-out agony is a tailor-made opportunity for al-Jazeera English, which it has seized with careful on-the-ground journalism. If the US cable owners relent to the emerging public pressure, it will mark a coup for a news service that, until recently, was battling to prove it had credibility and salience with many Western audiences. Al-Jazeera TV news Television industry Egypt Protest Middle East John Plunkett Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

AOL is buying the Huffington Post for a whopping $315 million, and Ariana Huffington will become the owner of AOL news content. The purchase will bring the AOL news operation another 25 million visitors a day, reports AP. That’s expected to help AOL boost its struggling display advertising business. The…

Continue reading …
South Sudan to become world’s newest country

Preliminary results from southern Sudan’s referendum show that 99.5 per cent voted for independence from the north. But there has already been backlash – a mutiny by Sudanese troops refusing to leave the south, has spread through several towns. At least 50 people have been killed in the past four days. Al Jazeera’s Haru Mutasa reports from Juba in Southern Sudan on the challenges facing the new country.

Continue reading …
Ordinary Egyptians feel the pinch

More than 160 thousand tourists have fled Egypt, and many businesses have been shut for days. And as one of Al Jazeera’s correspondents in Cairo reports, ordinary Egyptians are now feeling the pinch.

Continue reading …

The Pittsburgh Steelers have struck first in the second half of the Super Bowl, though they still trail the Green Bay Packers 21-17 after Rashard Mendenhall’s 8-yard touchdown run less than 5 minutes after halftime. Highlights thus far: Aaron Rodgers threw a 29-yard touchdown pass to Jordy Nelson with 3:…

Continue reading …
Al Jazeera speaks to an Egyptian activist

Al Jazeera speaks to Ramy – a protester who has been camping out in the Egyptian capital Cairo’s Liberation Square for most nights.

Continue reading …

Irish-themed pubs are attracting drinkers from Anchorage to Abu Dhabi, but the real thing is in rapid decline in its homeland. The pub trade, particularly in the countryside, has been declining for years, due in part to a smoking ban and stricter drunk driving laws. Now, with high unemployment and…

Continue reading …

There are three things you have to do when singing the National Anthem at the Super Bowl: Look good, hit the right notes, and sing the correct lyrics. Christina Aguilera is two for three. Aguilera, who isn’t exactly an anthem novice (she sang the song at Game 7 of last…

Continue reading …

The Green Bay Packers have jumped out to a 14-0 lead over the Pittsburgh Steelers in the Super Bowl by scoring twice in 24 seconds. Aaron Rodgers threw a 29-yard touchdown pass to Jordy Nelson with 3:44 left in the first quarter. The Packers then kicked off and the…

Continue reading …
Middle East crisis may leave world over an oil barrel

There are shades of the turmoil of the early 1970s in today’s inflation, financial instability and political chaos in Egypt For those with long enough memories, it all seems eerily familiar. Against a backdrop of already-rising inflation, the Middle East descends into chaos , sending the oil price surging and tipping the global economy into recession. Back in 1973-74, this is precisely what happened as a result of the Arab-Israeli war, via a boycott of the west by producers in the Opec cartel and a fourfold rise in the cost of crude oil. The crisis, though, had deeper roots: the inability of the US to anchor the international financial system, given the cost of the Vietnam war and Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programmes, a steady increase in price pressures over the previous half-decade, and the easy availability of credit as politicians tried to keep the long post-war boom going. Not that difficult to read across from 1973-74 to 2010-11, is it? The period since 2007 has seen an international financial crisis which is, arguably, even more profound than the break-up of the Bretton Woods system in 1971. The US has been left severely impaired by military over-stretch and the bursting of its housing bubble. The flooding of the global economy with cheap money has hastened economic recovery, but at the cost of record food prices, copper at $10,000 a tonne, and Brent crude back above $100 a barrel. Now the dominoes are toppling across north Africa: yesterday Tunisia, today Egypt, tomorrow perhaps Algeria. The equally undemocratic regimes in the Middle East, sitting on a large chunk of global oil reserves, look on anxiously. Should history repeat itself, the result will initially be higher inflation as companies mark up prices and workers seek higher wages. This will be followed by deflation caused by a squeeze on corporate profitability and consumer real incomes from dearer food and energy, coupled with a tightening of monetary policy as central banks seek to bring inflation down again. Financial markets, it has to be said, appear remarkably relaxed about this Life on Mars scenario. Share prices are roaring away on the back of optimism about the growth prospects for the world’s two biggest economies, China and the US. Bond markets also seem to have shrugged off the risk that policy-makers may soon start to increase the cost of borrowing. This view of the world, however, is based on a series of assumptions, some more plausible than others. The first is that there will be a peaceful transition to democracy in Egypt. The second is that there will be no ripple effect across the oil-producing states of the Middle East. The third is that, even if the protests do spread to, say, Saudi Arabia, oil flows would be relatively unaffected. The fourth is that the global recovery is now robust enough to shrug off any local difficulties thrown up by events in north Africa and the Middle East. And finally, that rising commodity prices are a sign of a recovery that is starting to put down roots. Parts of this analysis ring true. Egypt in 2011 with Hosni Mubarak on his way out looks a lot different to Egypt in October 1973 with the Israeli army crossing the Suez canal. There is no inherent reason why a new government should adopt an anti-western stance, and in the longer term the transition to democracy across the region would add to geo-political stability. Nor is it inevitable that other regimes will crumble. High food prices and chronic levels of unemployment affecting a young population are as evident in Saudi Arabia as they are in Egypt, but high oil prices mean the government is rolling in money and would seek to buy off the dissent. Having said that, the Saudi King Abdullah’s description of the protesters in Egypt as “infiltrators who seek to destabilise their country” shows that the Saudis will offer stick as well as carrot should the calls for regime-change spread. The current situation in the Middle East is not anomalous to that in eastern Europe in 1989 (when Mikhail Gorbachev pulled the plug by withdrawing Soviet military support) but one lesson from the end of communism is that even the most stable-looking of regimes can topple quickly in the right circumstances. But for oil supplies to be seriously affected, the unrest would have to spread and lead to regimes willing to use their crude stocks for political purposes. There has been a spike in oil prices, but for the moment that is all it is. There are long-term reasons explaining high oil prices, but no obvious reason why events in Egypt should see the cost of crude approaching the record levels of almost $150 a barrel seen in 2008. But what’s “obvious” does not always matter that much in financial markets, where prices are influenced by waves of over-confidence interspersed with bouts of panic. At the moment, the mood is one of supreme optimism, marked not just by a willingness to shrug off events in Egypt but also to downplay evidence of overheating in Asia and the commodity speculation encouraged by the Federal Reserve’s cheap money policy. Ironically, this will lead to even higher oil prices and even dearer food, increasing the chances of an eventual hard landing. So where does this leave policy? Those pressing for monetary tightening argue that the lesson from 1973-74 is that once inflation becomes embedded it is awfully difficult to remove. Policy has been too loose for too long, they say. Doing nothing runs the risk of even more air being pumped into asset bubbles, which will eventually burst, leading to recession. Those arguing for policy to be left unchanged or loosened say that unions are much less powerful than in 1973 and cannot bid up the price of their labour in response to higher commodity prices. The rising cost of oil and food act in effect as a tax on consumers, they would argue, leading to deflationary pressures and eventually lower inflation. Tightening policy would simply turn a slowdown into recession, particularly in countries such as Britain, where high levels of personal debt mean individuals are vulnerable to higher interest rates. For the moment, interest rates are likely to be left unchanged but events in the Middle East have added to an already tricky policy dilemma. In truth, it is hard to see how this ends well. The reason oil is so expensive reflects what is going on in China and the US rather than Egypt and Tunisia, but we should still be concerned. Why? Because each of the four major recessions since the early 1970s have been preceded by a leap in oil prices. Crude facts Oil Economics Middle East Egypt Hosni Mubarak Inflation Larry Elliott guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …