Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 2036)
What will the Kates be wearing

Speculation is rife about the design of the royal wedding dress, and for Kate Moss’s ‘big day’ too, but it’s all idle rumour There has been a lot of coverage of which designers Kate Moss and Kate Middleton have chosen to design their wedding dresses. But is any of this speculation reliable? Sonia, by email Truly, ’tis the summer of “the Wedding Dress of Kate M”. Let’s start with the Middleton, a young woman who is currently discovering that vitriol truly does abhor a vacuum. Thus, even if you dress as much like a middle-aged woman as a twentysomething can, and you lose so much weight that no one can take unflattering photos of your thighs, the Daily Wail will then spew cackling vitriol about how you are now, in fact, too thin (the line between being too thin and too fat for a woman in Daily Mail-land is so fine as to be nonexistent and may, in fact, be the Atlantis of body shapes.) At some unspecified point, in some secret location, a cabal of fashion editors decided that they would, as one, proclaim that Sarah Burton, the designer for Alexander McQueen, would create Middleton’s wedding dress, even though Kate has never been – shall we say – adventurous in her choice of fashion and Burton’s last

Continue reading …
Census religion question flawed

Secularist organisations claim data is used to justify religious privilege in state policy on public services Humanists have attacked the religion question in the 2011 census for being “fatally flawed” because it is “highly misleading” and does not help with the planning of public services. In a British Humanist Association poll, 61% of 1,896 adults in England and Wales said they belonged to a religious denomination or body. When asked in a subsequent question if they were religious, only 29% of the same people said yes. It also showed that 48% of the people interviewed who said they were Christian believed that Jesus was a person. Asked how often they went to a place of worship for religious reasons, 63% of respondents said they had not done so in the past year, while 20% said they had never visited a place of worship for religious reasons. The BHA poll comes days ahead of the 2011 census on March 27, which has estimated costs of £480m and a workforce of 35,000. Secularists and humanists oppose the voluntary question on religion – featured for the first time in the 2001 census – because they claim the data is used to “justify” religious privilege in state policy on public services. Today BHA chief executive Andrew Copson said its poll was “further evidence” the census data was “highly misleading” because it gave an inaccurate representation of religiosity in the UK. “We urge people who do not want to give continuing or even greater importance to unshared religions in our public life to tick ‘No Religion’ in the census.” Earlier this month its census campaign posters were banned from railway stations because the slogan – “If you’re not religious, for God’s sake say so” – was deemed likely to cause serious and widespread offence. “We used to tick ‘Christian’ but we’re not really religious. We’ll tick ‘No Religion’ this time. We’re sick of hearing politicians say this is a religious country and giving millions to religious organisations and the pope’s state visit. Money like that should go where it is needed,” says one of the banned posters. The ban, initiated by companies that own advertising space in stations, followed advice from the Advertising Standards Authority. Religion Census Riazat Butt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Yesterday, Moammar Gadhafi told President Obama “I would still love you” even if there was a war between Libya and America. Today, he told allied forces to buckle up. In a telephone call to state television, Gadhafi reportedly spoke of a “long war,” saying, “We will not leave our land…

Continue reading …

It’s been nearly a decade since a Saudi pilot crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11, but a plan for the US Air Force to train Saudi Arabian pilots in Idaho has some people outraged, reports al-Jazeera . As part of a huge $60 billion arms deal made last autumn, the Air…

Continue reading …
Spanish stolen art list published

Catalogue is designed to help reunite stolen art and precious objects with their rightful owners Spanish police have published a catalogue of recovered stolen art and precious objects in the hope of reuniting them with their rightful owners. Among the items retrieved during raids are six Picasso pieces from 1933 titled Cardinal Sins, each in its own silver frame. Other pieces featured in the catalogue include an Etruscan bronze sculpture estimated by police to be 2,000 years old, jewellery made of gold, diamonds and emeralds, Roman coins, and a 17th-century tapestry depicting the Battle of the Granicus, at which Alexander the Great defeated the Persian Empire. AP Madrid Spain Europe Art theft Art guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US Army ‘kill team’ in Afghanistan

Commanders brace for backlash of anti-US sentiment that could be more damaging than after the Abu Ghraib scandal Commanders in Afghanistan are bracing themselves for possible riots and public fury triggered by the publication of “trophy” photographs of US soldiers posing with the dead bodies of defenceless Afghan civilians they killed. Senior officials at Nato’s International Security Assistance Force in Kabul have compared the pictures published by the German news weekly Der Spiegel to the images of US soldiers abusing prisoners in Abu Ghraib in Iraq which sparked waves of anti-US protests around the world. They fear that the pictures could be even more damaging as they show the aftermath of the deliberate murders of Afghan civilians by a rogue US Stryker tank unit that operated in the southern province of Kandahar last year. Some of the activities of the self-styled “kill team” are already public, with 12 men currently on trial in Seattle for their role in the killing of three civilians. Five of the soldiers are on trial for pre-meditated murder, after they staged killings to make it look like they were defending themselves from Taliban attacks. Other charges include the mutilation of corpses, the possession of images of human casualties and drug abuse. All of the soldiers have denied the charges. They face the death penalty or life in prison if convicted. The case has already created shock around the world, particularly with the revelations that the men cut “trophies” from the bodies of the people they killed. An investigation by Der Spiegel has unearthed approximately 4,000 photos and videos taken by the men. The magazine, which is planning to publish only three images, said that in addition to the crimes the men were on trial for there are “also entire collections of pictures of other victims that some of the defendants were keeping”. The US military has strived to keep the pictures out of the public domain fearing it could inflame feelings at a time when anti-Americanism in Afghanistan is already running high. In a statement, the army said it apologised for the distress caused by photographs “depicting actions repugnant to us as human beings and contrary to the standards and values of the United States”. The lengthy Spiegel article that accompanies the photographs contains new details about the sadistic behaviour of the men. In one incident in May last year, the article says, during a patrol, the team apprehended a mullah who was standing by the road and took him into a ditch where they made him kneel down. The group’s leader, Staff Sergeant Calvin Gibbs, then allegedly threw a grenade at the man while an order was given for him to be shot. Afterwards, Gibbs is described cutting off one of the man’s little fingers and removing a tooth. The patrol team later claimed to their superiors that the mullah had tried to threaten them with a grenade and that they had no choice but to shoot. Last night many organisations employing foreign staff, including the United Nations, ordered their staff into a “lockdown”, banning all movements around Kabul and requiring people to remain in their compounds. In addition to the threat from the publication of the photographs, security has been heightened amid fears the Taliban may try to attack Persian new year celebrations. Tomorrow could also attract attacks because Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, is due to make a speech declaring which areas of the country should be transferred from international to Afghan control in the coming months. One security manager for the US company DynCorp sent an email to clients warning that publication of the photos was likely “to incite the local population” as the “severity of the incidents to be revealed are graphic and extreme”. Afghanistan Nato US foreign policy United States Jon Boone guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

The NCAA may be better associated with madness in March, but it was all inspiration last night as Anthony Robles, an Arizona State University wrestler born without a right leg, snagged an NCAA title in what he says is the final match of his life. The 125-pounder took a 7-1…

Continue reading …
Lecturers to strike over reforms

Protest planned against introduction of Lord Hutton’s pension reforms and will affect a third of universities in England Lecturers at a third of English universities will go on strike over changes to their pensions. Thousands of academics at 47 universities and higher education colleges will form picket lines to protest against changes to the Universities Superannuation Scheme pension fund. From next month, the retirement age for academics will be raised from 60 to 65 and there will be an end to final salary pensions for new members. An even bigger strike is planned for Thursday when tens of thousands of lecturers from 63 universities are expected to stop work over what academics say is a growing sense of insecurity over their jobs, as well as anger at their pay and the pension changes. Lord Hutton has recommended that public sector employees retire later with pensions based on average pay over their career, rather than their final salary. The academics’ pension scheme is private, but some qualify for public pensions. Lecturers from Bradford, Essex, Liverpool, Oxford and Birmingham universities are among those taking part in the strike. The University and College Union (UCU) said some institutions were wrongly warning academics that they had to tell the heads of their faculties if they wanted to take part in the strikes. An email sent to staff at City University, from the institution’s director of human resources, states that colleagues will have their pay deducted if they go on strike and will be breaching their contract if they do not fulfil all their work duties. It asks staff to inform their dean or director if they intend to go on strike. UCU said academics were under no obligation to inform management. However, the union has told its members that if their managers ask after the strike whether they took part, they should answer truthfully. The Employers’ Pensions Forum said the retention of a final salary pension was an “exceptionally good benefit” and the changes were “in line with what looks to become the norm in all sectors”. Brian Cantor, the forum’s chair, said UCU had repeatedly failed to engage in the established process for agreeing scheme changes. But the union’s general secretary, Sally Hunt, said employers were refusing to talk to the UCU. Aaron Porter, president of the National Union of Students, said employers had forced lecturers towards strike action by not agreeing to negotiate. “Huge cuts to university budgets ideologically imposed by this government pose a massive threat to jobs and education. “NUS has worked closely with UCU throughout our campaigns to oppose government cuts and stands in solidarity with their strike action next week.” Meanwhile, graduates are giving in record numbers to UK universities, a survey has found. A poll conducted by university fund-raisers of 172 universities and colleges found more than 185,603 people or organisations had given to a higher education institution in the academic year 2009-10. In total, they gave £506m in cash and £94m in pledges. The previous year – 2008-09 – 165,682 people and organisations donated a total of £526m in cash and £22m in pledges. Joanna Motion, vice-president for International Operations at the Council for Advancement and Support of Education, which conducted the survey with a network of university fundraisers called the Ross Group, said there were early signs of a culture shift towards higher education philanthropy. Donations to US universities and colleges have only increased by 0.5% in the last year and are down to 2006 levels. Lecturers Higher education Lecturers’ pay Pensions Pay Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Coalition attacks wreak havoc on ground troops

Air strikes hit Gaddafi’s forces hard, but revolutionary leaders appeal for more The dozen or so men clustered behind the last smouldering tank looked as if they had died while they slept. Their blankets bore no burn marks so perhaps it was the force of blasts – powerful enough to rip the turrets off the Russian-made tanks and toss them 20 metres or more across the open field near Benghazi – that killed Muammar Gaddafi’s soldiers. The air attack came at 4am , after the tanks pulled back from a day-long assault on the rebel stronghold of Benghazi. The crews chose to rest in a field about 10 miles from the de facto capital of the anti-Gaddafi revolutionaries. It must have seemed safe to the soldiers. The rebels were far away and the tank crews would have seen any threat approaching by road. They gathered to eat and sleep behind the tank furthest into the field. But it was no protection from the threat in the sky. The tanks and their operators were sitting ducks in the open and probably never heard the planes. The French pilots did not even have to be concerned about the risk of harming civilians. Within moments, three of the four tanks in the field were shells. What was not immediately incinerated was mangled, thrown into the sky and dumped in bits on the earth. Machine guns twisted into grotesque shapes, broken engine parts and flattened shells lay among the wreckage. Four hours later, two of the tanks were still smouldering. A flatbed lorry used to haul them to the edge of Benghazi was on fire. A handful of pickup trucks, one carrying tins of food for the troops, had been burned out. Scavengers were picking over the corpses of Gaddafi’s dead soldiers. Wreckage was strewn in similar scenes along nearly 15 miles of road beyond Benghazi, the result of air strikes on targets across the country that turned the struggle between Gaddafi and Libya’s revolutionaries on its head in a moment. The barrage of attacks led by France, Britain and the US on Libya’s army, air bases and other military targets drew threats of a prolonged war from Gaddafi himself. But on the ground many of his forces were in disarray and fleeing in fear of further attacks from a new and unseen enemy. The air assault halted and then reversed the advances by Gaddafi’s army on Benghazi and other rebel-held towns. But the revolutionary leadership wanted more. On Sunday it appealed for an intensification of the air assault to destroy the Libyan ruler’s forces and open the way for the rebels to drive him from power. The first of the decapitated tanks sat just three miles outside Benghazi. Its turret lay flipped over a good distance away. The missile had torn out the heart of the armoured beast. But perhaps its crew was luckier than others. There were no bodies to be found and from the boxes of dates and long life milk lying on the ground a short walk across the field, it appears they may have been far enough away to survive the blast and flee. Another seven miles farther on lay a larger tank graveyard, at al-Wafia, and beyond that many more miles of destruction on the road toward Ajdabiya. Eight tanks, brought up to Benghazi to continue the terrifying assault on the city that began on Saturday, were destroyed altogether. More than a dozen other armoured vehicles of various kinds were wrecked, their remnants scattered on the scorched tarmac. A couple of multiple rocket launchers sat at the road side. One appeared to have no damage at all. Perhaps it broke down, or maybe its driver decided to get away from it fast – part of the intended effect of the air strikes to break the will of Gaddafi’s army to fight. Scattered among the ruined armour were thousands of bullets and empty tank shell boxes. Young rebels, known as shabab , danced on the armoured carcasses. They fired guns and chanted: “Here come the shabab. Gaddafi is finished”. Western powers leading the air assault said again that the attacks are about protecting civilians from Gaddafi, not regime change. But many of the revolutionaries see the coalition forces as fighting on their behalf. The air bombardment is regarded among rebel military commanders as creating a more level battle field by removing Gaddafi’s advantage of heavy armour. “There must be more attacks, to destroy his forces and heavy weapons,” said Kamal Mustafa Mahmoud, a rebel soldier on the edge of Benghazi. “Then they can leave Gaddafi to us. We know how to fight him but we are afraid of his heavy weapons. I want them to destroy the ground forces of Gaddafi.” A rebel commander in Benghazi, Ahmed al-Diwani, said that the air strikes open the way for the rebels to retake the towns they have lost in recent fighting and then continue their campaign toward Tripoli. But he acknowledged that it would be wrong to assume that the government’s army is a spent force because of the air strikes. “Gaddafi’s advantage was tanks and rockets. That was what was defeating us. When we did not face them we were winning. Now we can go forward again. We will still have to fight, but when they see that they cannot win, it will be over,” he said. As Gaddafi’s soldiers fled from around Benghazi after the air assault, the rebels seized the advantage to move back toward Ajdabiya, a town the two sides have battled over for nearly a week. Late today, people in the town said Gaddafi’s forces could no longer be seen. The revolution’s political leadership shares the fighters’ view that the air assault is about regime change. Salwa el-Deghali, of the national transitional council, said: “I’m happy the air strikes have started, but at the same time I’m worried that the international community will not keep up the attacks long enough to remove Gaddafi. There must be more attacks on Gaddafi’s forces, and fast. We need these attacks until he is crushed.” Asked if she thought the goal of the air attacks was regime change, she replied: “Yes, it’s to push him from power”. Deghali said that the revolutionary leadership is counting on the air assault to destroy Gaddafi’s army, either by killing its soldiers or encouraging them to desert. She said that when the threat of violent repression is removed, the council plans to call on Libyans to rise up in cities across the country. “When Gaddafi’s forces are destroyed, he will have no power. It will be easy to press forward,” she said. Essam Gheriani, a spokesman for the national council, said that with the air strikes destabilising Gaddafi, the revolutionaries would organise fresh popular uprisings in cities still under the Libyan leader’s control, in the belief that it will be difficult for him to find the forces to put them down. However, beyond the broad plans to blend popular uprisings with armed resistance, the revolutionary council does not appear as yet to have decided how to take advantage of the shift in the military situation. Some of its members fled Benghazi during the government’s assault on Saturday. Others remain trapped in Gaddafi-controlled areas. For all the revolutionaries’ appeals for foreign help, there are limits. Deghali reiterated the condition laid down since the beginning of the uprising: the air assault is welcomed, but foreign troops will not be accepted on Libyan soil. The country’s history of occupation by the Italians and strong views about the invasion of Iraq have created a deep-seated suspicion of foreign armies. “We don’t want what happened in Iraq with international intervention,” she said. “Foreign troops on the ground, no. Just the air strikes.” Middle East Libya Muammar Gaddafi Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

As Mike Mullen made the talk-show rounds to explain the administration’s actions in Libya, Capitol Hill’s finest followed him around to offer their two cents. Republicans are roundly slamming President Obama, with Lindsey Graham saying he’s acting as though “leading the free world is an inconvenience,” and worrying that “we’re…

Continue reading …