Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1927)
Libyan foreign minister flies to UK ‘to resign’

Mousa Kousa says he is no longer willing to represent the regime in a morale boost for the rebels Muammar Gaddafi’s authority inside Libya suffered a significant blow when his foreign minister quit and fled to the UK in a specially arranged flight organised by the British intelligence services. Mousa Kousa, who was one of the Libyan leader’s closest allies, arrived on a chartered plane from Tunisia and said he was “no longer willing” to represent the dictator’s regime. We can confirm that Mousa Kousa arrived at Farnborough airport on 30 March from Tunisia,” a Foreign Office spokesman said. Kousa’s defection provides Britain with a figure of unparalleled intelligence value in terms of understanding the situation within Gaddafi’s inner circle. The move also provides a morale boost to the disorganised rebel forces who have again suffered major reverses at the hands of pro-Gaddafi forces in the past 48 hours. The Foreign Office said last night: “He travelled here under his own free will. He has told us that he is resigning his post. We are discussing this with him and we will release further detail in due course. “Mousa Kousa is one of the most senior figures in Gaddafi’s government and his role was to represent the regime internationally – something that he is no longer willing to do.” Kousa’s defection will be seen as a vindication of the coalition’s efforts to intimidate key members of the regime by warning them that if they do not defect they will be taken to the international criminal court to face war crimes trials. News of the defection first emerged after the official Tunisian news agency reported rumours that Kousa had crossed the border into Libya’s western neighbour, but without any clear indication of his motives. The Libyan government, possibly misled by Mousa Kousa, insisted he had left the country on a diplomatic mission for Gaddafi, but the foreign office then disputed this account. Britain and the US have been in regular contact with him in recent days, mainly through intelligence sources. Probably more than any other senior official inside the Libyan regime, Kousa is seen as the key figure who persuaded Gaddafi to make a deal with British intelligence agencies to stop developing weapons of mass destruction in return for the ending of its pariah status. However, his relationship with Britain in the past has been far from convivial. Kousa has previously been seen as one of the controlling forces behind the Lockerbie bombing and it was not clear whether he was seeking political asylum. In 1980, he was expelled from the UK and, for 15 years, he was head of Libyan foreign intelligence – including in the period of the Lockerbie bombing. He has always denied Libya was involved in the bombing. The Foreign Office added: “We encourage those around Gaddafi to abandon him and embrace a better future for Libya that allows political transition and real reform that meets the aspirations of the Libyan people.” “He has defected from the regime,” said Noman Benotman, a friend of Kousa and senior analyst at Britain’s Quilliam thinktank. “He wasn’t happy at all. He doesn’t support the government attacks on civilians,” he said. “He’s seeking refuge in Britain and hopes he will be treated well,” Benotman said. Kousa’s decision to abandon the regime came as it emerged that Barack Obama had signed a secret government order authorising covert US help to the Libyan rebels via such organisations as the CIA. The order, known as a “finding” was signed within the last two or three weeks. The move will undoubtedly fuel speculation that the US and its allies are planning to arm the rebels. The New York Times has reported that small groups of CIA operatives have been working in Libya for several weeks gathering intelligence for military air strikes and making contacts with the rebels battling Gaddafi’s forces, according to American officials. It also reported that “dozens” of British agents and special forces were also inside Libya, helping direct attacks by British aircraft. Both sides in the Libya conflict are running short of weapons and ammunition after almost two weeks of intense fighting that has brutally exposed the military shortcomings of the rebels, the Guardian has been told. The rebels were forced into yet another retreaton Wednesday, with Gaddafi’s forces regaining much of the territory taken by the rebels at the weekend and threatening to humiliate the western coalition by again coming within striking distance of the city of Benghazi. Concern is deepening in the coalition about the rebels’ fragile morale and lack of military experience to mount a sustained challenge to the regime. A military stalemate is now a real possibility, partly as both sides are struggling to re-equip their forces. With fighting continuing in Misrata and regime forces pushing east as far as the strategic town of Ajdabiya, the issue of rearming has become paramount. Coalition bombing raids had helped “chop the legs off” Gaddafi’s supply chain, meaning he could no longer get rockets and ammunition to the front line. “Ammunition is going to become an issue,” said a defence source. “The regime’s logistics are very stretched. Their ability to move ammunition 400 to 500 miles is becoming constraining. Regime forces have been seriously degraded. But there is more to do to prevent more bloodshed, to prevent more loss of life.” While the regime is thought to be “hurting more and missing more” because many of its heavy weapons have been destroyed, the rebels could struggle to take advantage because of their own problems. They do not have a supply chain or logistical mechanisms. Many of the rebels have not experienced being under fire before the last three weeks and there is no sign of any improvement in their fighting capability. Though the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, and British foreign secretary William Hague have hinted that arming the rebels might be allowed under the terms of the two UN resolutions, it is understood the UK has not provided any equipment so far, and there are no plans to do so. No training has been provided either. A defence source insisted there had been “no request for ground forces” and that the coalition had “no intention” of providing them. People who had returned to Ajdabiya after it fell to the revolutionaries on Saturday again fled on Wednesday as the government’s army seized two important oil towns further along the coastal highway, Ras Lanuf and Brega. It was not immediately clear if the regime intended to try to take Ajdabiya again after air strikes last week destroyed a significant number of tanks and armoured vehicles. But the government has pressed ahead with its counteroffensive using not only the artillery that it still retains but what appears to be a larger ground force than previously deployed. On Monday, the rebels moved within 45 miles of Sirte, the strategically and politically important birthplace of Gaddafi, and were proclaiming they would be in Tripoli before the end of the week after advancing about 200 miles in two days under the cover of the western air strikes. But the regime’s counterattack has outmanoeuvred the poorly disciplined and ill-trained rebels who barely made a stand at Brega before fleeing toward Ajdabiya. If the government were to move on Ajdabiya, that would once again open the road to Benghazi. The revolutionary leadership, which has called for an intensification of air strikes, said it was not concerned by the see-sawing military fortunes. “Whether we advance 50km or retreat 50km … it’s a big country. They will go back the next day,” said spokesman Mustafa Gheriani in Benghazi. But the situation has raised concerns that the rebels’ inability to hold territory will undermine coalition commitment. The coalition now believes it has a much clearer idea of the strengths and weaknesses of the two sides and the issues that could be crucial in the coming days and weeks. It is now thought that: • Thousands of foreign fighters are in Libya helping to support Gaddafi and more are still coming from countries such as Chad, Niger and Mali. Many are being lured to Tripoli because Gaddafi pays them well. The foreigners, some of them migrant workers, are being used for security in urban areas, freeing up other soldiers to fight the rebels. • Misrata has become a crucible of the fighting and is the focus of the regime’s attempts to snuff out the opposition. Coalition air strikes have crushed attempts by Gaddafi’s navy to blockade the city and attack it from the sea. Four Libyan vessels have been sunk, and one beached. • Al-Qaida has a negligible presence in Libya and is not considered a factor at all in the current fighting. • Gaddafi has no chemical weapons in any usable form. It is thought that he only has the remnants of the weapons programme that was dismantled in 2004, and coalition air strikes have targeted the Scud missiles that could have been used to deliver them. How the conflict now develops may depend on whether Gaddafi’s opponents in the west of the country are prepared to rise up against a regime that has promoted a culture of fear for the last 40 years. That culture is thought to be most acute inside the regime itself – Gaddafi is said to hold his lieutenants, extended family, and indeed his children in a state of near perpetual conflict and fear. The default position in society is assessed to be that any resistance to Gaddafi or his regime is something only talked about in the privacy of your own home. The scale of the deployment by UK forces has also become clear. Ten Typhoon and eight Tornado aircraft are operating out of Italy, supported by the cruise missile submarine, HMS Turbulent, which has been replaced by HMS Triumph. Getting equipment and armaments to the Mediterranean involved 24 transport aircraft, including nine C17s and 11 Hercules aircraft, and two chartered Antonov flights for 583 military personnel. The RAF so far has undertaken 130 hours of refuelling missions, involving 500,000 litres of aviation fuel. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Patrick Wintour Richard Norton-Taylor Nick Hopkins Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Marco Rubio vows to vote against raising the debt limit in a few weeks—unless it’s the last time and accompanied by comprehensive reform—and he casts the decision not as a wonky economic debate but as a “defining moment in American history.” In his op-ed in the Wall Street…

Continue reading …

During last year’s Census, more than 40,000 troops were deployed from North Carolina’s military bases—but because only 12,200 of them listed North Carolina as their home state, the state lost out on a congressional seat. That’s because, though the Census usually counts the troops’ current base as…

Continue reading …

An Ohio House panel today passed a bill that would curb collective bargaining rights for public-sector unions, after adding a number of controversial amendments. The new additions would allow public workers to opt out of paying dues, force unions to hold a vote before spending money politically, and allow local…

Continue reading …
Photographer Fergus Greer’s best shot

‘Leigh Bowery would call about twice a year, saying he had some more “looks”. He called this one Future Juliet’ I first met the Australian performance artist Leigh Bowery in 1986, at one of his shows at the Anthony d’Offay gallery in London. I was a bit taken aback: Leigh was in an outfit that made him look 7ft tall, and his face was covered in paint. But he just said: “Let’s do some pictures.” That was the start of our relationship. We worked together for eight years, until he died. I was never a clubber: I’d just come out of the army and was an outsider to the world of his performance. That gave us an interest in each other. He’d call me about twice a year, saying he had some more “looks”, as he called his costumes. This one, which we did in July 1989 and Leigh called Future Juliet, was part of a series

Continue reading …
Beyoncé and her dad split

Beyoncé’s dad is no longer her manager, another case of how showbiz and parents don’t always mix It’s Johnny Sharp been 20 years since she joined her first girl group aged nine, but Beyoncé Knowles has finally parted company with father and long-time manager, Mathew. By mutual consent, they say, but you wonder if Mathew’s plans to spend more time on his gospel label were announced with all the enthusiasm of those MPs who step down to “spend more time with their families”. You could hardly blame Beyoncé. Stories are legion of Mathew’s strict control of her affairs and those of Destiny’s Child, with whom she rose to fame. And he was never a man to fall out with, as early members LaTavia Roberson and LeToya Luckett discovered when they saw the band’s video for Say My Name – and two new singers in their place. But if Beyoncé has been the instigator of this move, then it once again shows us that in showbiz, families and management rarely mix well. The rod of iron (not to mention other blunt objects) with which manager father Joe is said to have ruled the Jackson clan didn’t exactly result in pop’s happiest family, but at least none of them went as far as 80s teenpop sensation Tiffany, who, at 16, applied in court to be declared an “emancipated minor”, in effect attempting to divorce her “momager”. Last year, Kylie Minogue sacked her mother from her touring party, citing the impeccably altruistic motivation of “wanting her to relax more”. Dina Lohan’s self-effacing approach to promoting herself and her daughters/clients Lindsay and Ali as a walking, squawking soap opera has provoked much debate, while the first act of Britney Spears’s father Jamie when he became “conservator” of her affairs involved suing her old manager for allegedly drugging her. That one looks set to end well, then. Stark contrast with Paul Weller, whose father John managed him for 30 years until his death in 2009, a confidante to the end. Mind you, couldn’t John have had a word about some of those haircuts? Beyoncé Celebrity Johnny Sharp guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Here’s a tip: If you’re going to join your office’s lottery pool, best to be consistent. One man in New York decided to take a pass last week because he wasn’t feeling lucky … and that was the week seven of his co-workers won the $319 million Mega Millions jackpot. “They…

Continue reading …
Stars come out in force for Mikhail Gorbachev’s 80th

Last leader of the Soviet Union celebrates his 80th birthday at the Royal Albert Hall with a charitable concert hosted by Kevin Spacey

Continue reading …
Clegg to gather social mobility data

The deputy prime minister says data collected will enable the government to see if policies are working The government is to introduce an annual “report card” to assess whether it is improving people’s life chances, drawing together seven indicators starting with babies’ body weight and going all the way through life to success in adulthood to see whether it is breaking the link between social class and achievement. Nick Clegg will publish the social mobility strategy, which will include the new quantitative measures for people’s performance at different stages in their life, on Tuesday. The new sets of numbers will give governments an indicator of whether a given policy decision is working or not, and – monitored by an independent adviser, the former Labour minister Alan Milburn – would see the government come under pressure to discard those policies having adverse effects. The deputy prime minister said the indicators would be acted on if they appeared to be highlighting a problem. He said: “Yes, it will trigger a reaction – it’s a series of dials and if one of the dials shifts the wrong way, indicators are meaningless unless you act.” Clegg described meeting resistance from Whitehall as he put together the new indicators. He was told it would create a rod for his own back. A government source drew a parallel with giving responsibility for monetary policy to the Bank of England in 1997 and the more recent transfer of analysis of the economy to the Office for Budget Responsibility. The source said: “With this, we’ll know which ones we’re failing on and see which policies are working. It will take a bit of time but year-on-year we’ll see if something is getting worse.” Clegg said: “You won’t really be able to prove you’re making a difference immediately; it will go way beyond this parliament.” The new self-assessment regime for the government has been crafted in a cabinet committee led by Clegg, and although it largely draws on data already compiled, such as babies’ birth weight and the numbers taking free school meals, some tests will need new metrics drawn up. The government has already set aside £30m to undertake an entirely new cohort study. Clegg and the universities minister, David Willetts, were in Washington on Wednesday for meetings with the US vice-president, Joe Biden. Their officials have been working together on the issue for months and their teams took part in a seminar on social mobility from school to higher education. This government, as Labour before it, is grappling with research showing that the prospect of someone born in the 1970s doing better than their parents has decreased from the same metric in the 1950s. Only one in five young people from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs compared with three-quarters from rich families. En route to Washington, Willetts said people in their 30s still appeared to have their earnings dictated by what their parents did. Now the government want to build up a more granular picture. A government source said: “Academic measures of social mobility generally compare the income and/or social class of children during their 30s and 40s with that of their parents. They won’t tell us about the impact of current policy for at least 40 years.” Brushing off charges that the new data set would merely inquire into people’s lives without being able to do anything about it, Clegg said he believed changes brought in by the coalition government would be picked up on the indicators, though it would take longer than the course of one parliament since a policy they believe the key to increasing social mobility – the pupil premium – doesn’t come into force until 2015. Clegg pointed to changes he believed would also help: increasing the income tax free threshold; changes to welfare that will see “work pay; the new requirement that those universities charging the full £9,000 tuition fee would only be able to do so if they could show how they were opening up access to less advantaged students. Willetts also said he believed those universities will be favoured who adopt the model of universities such as Texas who reserve 10% of their places for some of the state’s poorer students. The new index will be remarkable for seeking to collect data on those already grown up as the government now believes social mobility in adults is something the state can and should monitor. Another nuance will be an attempt to make the social mobility agenda relevant to the ” squeezed middle ” by making it clear that the metrics include “aspirational measures”, measuring the life chances of those in the middle classes compared with the most advantaged, alongside a major push on the opportunities for bright but poor children. While some of the indicators suggested that only the widening or narrowing gap between the most affluent and the least affluent would be picked up, particularly ones relying on free school meals as a measure of deprivation, Clegg said others in the data set would also include grades within. He also pointed to the pupil premium, saying that in improving school discipline and so learning, it would become a greater social good for those of all social backgrounds in a class. Willetts said: “We want to improve social mobility all the way up. There are lots of people in the middle who are not doing well either. My critique of what happened under Labour would be people at the very top did well and some at the very bottom did well, but the middle did badly. This is about the aspiring member of the middle classes who wants to become a doctor or a journalist but hasn’t the connections nor been to an expensive school. Your chances to do that declined significantly under Labour.” Key Whitehall departments will be held accountable for ensuring the social mobility indicators that fall within their department, with the obvious onus on them that they help drive them down. David Willetts pointed to evidence he had showing that while poor bright kids fall behind their less intelligent more affluent fellow pupils when very young, they can make that up at university and later. “University may be the first stage of the process where educational attainment, as determined by class, can actually reverse and poorer students can excel.” The new indicators will not be legislated for, meaning they can’t bind the hand of future governments – germane given the use of the indicators will only truly be felt over years – but it would be difficult for a future government to jettison the exercise. The government is at pains to point out that the drive for greater social mobility includes an attempt to improve the life chances of not just the absolutely poorest but also those on median incomes. In Washington on Wednesday David Willetts joint-chaired a session with Biden’s director of economics, Jared Bernstein, to look at what has happened as living standards have either flattened or declined. The British politicians are also impressed by mechanisms American universities have used to increase the number of poor children going on to university with the University of Texas reserving 10% of its places for the state’s brightest but poorest. Willetts praised the scheme but said that because the government did not control the admissions process of British universities it couldn’t be replicated. Instead, he pointed to similar schemes being launched around the country where Russell group universities are identifying kids doing well at GCSEs from state schools and offering them places on condition they commit and engage to extra work in the meantime. Willetts said they were to be encouraged. He did however say that as a principle it should not be one the right is afraid of: “The [Texas] programme suggests the caricature of leftwing social engineering but I don’t regard Texas to be a hotbed of leftwing socialism.” The day before, when taking part in a Q&A in Mexico City with students, in Spanish, Nick Clegg was heckled by a student Jesus Romo over his role in increasing tuition fees in the UK. University challenge Nick Clegg hoped for a break 6,000 miles away from Westminster, where his name is synonymous with increasing tuition fees, but even in a country with no fees there was no respite. No sooner had he embarked on a question and answer session with students in Mexico City than he was challenged over the government’s plan to treble tuition fees to £9,000 a year. Jesus Romo, 18, told Clegg he wanted to study in Britain next year but now had misgivings. “Given that your government seems to be saying that you cannot afford to educate your own population, do you really think it is going to be appropriate for us Mexicans to be taking up places in your universities?” he asked . Clegg told Romo his question was “not a particularly objective” one. The student told reporters that the government would not have got away with such a policy in Mexico. He said: “It is insane to think people are going to be able to pay back those sums. If he really wants more people from poorer backgrounds to go to university then those students should not have to worry about paying out huge sums.Otherwise they will not come.” After talks with Clegg the Mexican president, Felipe Calderón, suggested that British students unable to afford UK universities should come to Mexico. “We hope young British men and women will come here to take advantage of our universities,” he said. Nick Clegg David Willetts Education policy Social mobility Equality United States Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

The GE tax avoidance story was kind of a big one—so why wasn’t it covered on NBC News when it broke on Friday … or on Saturday or Sunday or Monday? Critics were quick to point out that GE is NBC’s parent company, but representatives insist that had nothing to…

Continue reading …