From protecting the natural environment to badger culling to water bills, key policies are being postponed. Have cuts bitten too deep? Is the department in ‘special measures’? Cutting a 30% of an organisation’s budget before working out how that organisation will actually run on the reduced funds isn’t very clever. But that’s what appears to have happened under Caroline Spelman’s stewardship of the department of the environment, food and rural affairs. How else can we explain the long list of delays which span right across the work of the department, from water bills to badger culls? Not forgetting the humiliating U-turn on the forestry sell-off , the deep cuts to flood defences across the nation and a feeble sustainability vision , here’s a list: Natural environment white paper Due: April 2011 Expected: Officially, later this year – before the summer, I’m told This flagship policy will, Defra says, protect and enhance the natural environment that “underpins our economic prosperity, our health and our wellbeing” and will be the department’s first environment white paper for 20 years. It is eagerly anticipated by greens across the spectrum – but it will miss its April deadline, as set out in Defra’s business plan. Badger cull consultation : government’s response Due: Feb 2011 Expected: Possibly late May Bovine tuberculosis takes a terrible toll on cattle farmers, but effective culling of badgers in complex and costly and many animal lovers oppose any cull. The proposals – that farmers do the culling themselves – has many flaws, not least being dismissed as “among the worst options” by scientists and likely to cost more than doing nothing. In February, announcing a delay, agriculture minister Jim Paice said : “we need to make sure we get it right.” With emotions running high on both sides, it’s a tough one, but how many more months must we wait? Waste policy review Review announced: June 2010 Expected: May 2011 The government announced their review of waste policies in June 2010 to “ensure we are taking the right steps towards creating a ‘zero waste’ economy.” But, according to stakeholders, its results have been repeatedly delayed. In its absence, the government has said it will ban fines for misuse of dustbins , but is unable to say how refuse will be better dealt with than now, especially ending the UK’s addiction to landfill. Water white paper Due: June 2011 Expected: Autumn 2011 The white paper will “reform the water industry to ensure more efficient use of water and the protection of poorer households”. It follows the Cave review of competition in the water industry and Walker review of water charging, published in April 2009 and June 2009 respectively. Food policy Due: Unknown This is not strictly late as there’s no such policy being developed, despite criticism of the government’s plans for feeding a growing population sustainably and healthily being ‘insubstantial” . Banning wild animals from circuses consultation: government’s response Consultation ended: March 2010 Due: Unknown This issue raise huge passion among animal rights campaigners, but a year on, there’s still no response, though the first moves were made by Labour in 2006, who must share some of the blame for the delay. Dangerous dogs consultation: government’s response Consultation ended: June 2010 Expected: “Later in the year”, I’m told This consultation on increasing the protection of the public was launched by the last government after a campaign by post men and women. Parliamentary answers: Thanks to work by Thomas Docherty MP , we can see that Defra has failed to answer 42% of written questions from MPs on time, making them the third worst of the 13 departments Docherty challenged. By contrast, the department of energy and climate change answered 77% of questions on time. Defra refutes my suggestion that the deep budget cuts are taking their toll. “Defra is playing its part in reducing the deficit, but this has no impact on policy development,” said a spokesman. “It is important to address all likely practical issues and ensure the department has properly consulted stakeholders before final decisions are made – which will mean less red tape and more opportunities for business and communities.” Unsurprisingly, Mary Creagh, Labour’s shadow secretary of state for environment, has a different view: “This is a department in special measures. The government’s ideologically driven belief in the small state is sending environmental policy into reverse. Defra’s stop-go approach to policy is creating uncertainty for businesses and communities that want to invest in green jobs and improve the environment.” Perhaps the Defra delays stem from the forestry sell-off fiasco, meaning every policy now has to be examined over and over in order to avoid another disaster. I’d be interested to hear more about that. Whatever the reason for the delays, while we wait, biodiversity continues to decline, cattle continue to contract TB and rubbish continues to be dumped. Green politics Water Damian Carrington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Police find 28 more bodies near Texas border in one of the worst mass killings in Mexico’s drug wars Mexican detectives investigating a mass grave near the US border have found 28 more bodies, bringing to 116 the total number of victims in one of the worst mass killings in the country’s drug wars. The number of bodies taken to the city of Matamoros, across the border from Brownsville, Texas, has overwhelmed local forensic services. Most of the dead are being held in a refrigerated meat truck in the morgue’s car park. Mexico’s attorney general, Marisela Morales, said 17 suspects with ties to the Zetas drug cartel had been arrested in connection with the murders. The Zetas, who are fighting their erstwhile allies in the Gulf cartel for control of Tamaulipas state, were also blamed for killing 72 Central and South American migrants in the same municipality in August last year. Survivors said that massacre followed an attempt to recruit the migrants as gunmen or drug mules . The first bodies in the latest mass grave were discovered last week , after reports armed groups were pulling young male passengers off buses passing through the municipality of San Fernando. Drug violence has killed more than 34,000 people since the president, Felipe Calderón, launched a military-led crackdown on the cartels in December 2006. The latest discovery challenges the government’s insistence that the majority of the killings are the result of inter-cartel conflict. It also underlines how ineffective the federal presence in Tamaulipas has been at stopping the carnage. The interior minister, Francisco Blake Mora, said more troops and federal police had been sent to patrol the roads in the state. “Organised crime, in its desperation, resorts to committing extraordinary atrocities that we cannot and should not tolerate as a government and as a society,” he said. “Those responsible for this massacre will be punished for it.” People from around Mexico looking for relatives who recently disappeared in the state have converged on Matamoros hoping and fearing that their search may be nearly over. Some expressed anger at the slow pace of the identification process and the inadequate support they feel they have received from the authorities, which so far has been limited to taking DNA samples. “There isn’t anybody to even offer us a glass of water,” a woman looking for her brother said in an interview broadcast on W Radio. “The people in this country should understand that life is not worth anything here.” Bus companies continued to offer services but said they were taking security measures such as only driving during the day and changing timetables. Last week the US government warned American citizens not to travel along roads in Tamaulipas. Mexico Drugs trade Jo Tuckman guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …See which activists and dissidents have been detained, formally arrested or missing since February 2011 in the security drive apparently sparked by calls for a ‘jasmine revolution’
Continue reading …Conference delegates vote 99% in favour of motion as health secretary struggles to persuade public of merits of NHS reforms The Royal College of Nursing has overwhelmingly backed a motion of no confidence in Andrew Lansley’s handling of the NHS reforms. Delegates at the RCN conference in Liverpool voted 99% in favour of the motion as the beleaguered health secretary struggles to persuade the public of the merits of his health reforms. Nurses are angry that Lansley refused to deliver a keynote speech to the conference, opting instead to meet a group of around 60 nurses in Liverpool as part of the government’s “listening exercise” on the controversial reforms. However, the health secretary appeared unmoved by the almost unanimous dissent from a union traditionally seen as being more conservative in character than some. Responding to the vote, he insisted most NHS workers were “keen” on the reforms, despite the fact that unions including the British Medical Association have also condemned parts of the bill, as have patient groups, royal colleges and MPs from various parties. Pointing to the rare decision to “pause” the passage of the health and social care bill to listen to concerns about the plans and defy “myths” he claimed were being propagated, the health secretary said: “It’s not that the professions aren’t keen to do it. “What they are all keen to do, and particularly their representative bodies, is to make sure we get this legislation right. And I think we share that.” He said the government would amend the bill further to deal with “myths” and “misconceptions”, telling reporters: “Of course they’re substantive changes, because otherwise it would be trivial. We’re not here to do a trivial thing, we’re here to get it right. “This is a once in a generation opportunity to give patients greater control of the decisions being made about their care … greater opportunities for those in the frontline of the NHS not only to have resources get to the frontline but responsibility and freedom to use those resources better to improve care for patients. “That’s why actually the professions supported it, it’s why 90% of GPs’ surgeries across the country have stepped forward and said we want to be pathfinders, showing how we can do this. “We’ve already amended the bill and we will amend it further in order to make absolutely certain that some of the myths that are being propagated are dealt with, some of the misconceptions are dealt with.” NHS Health Nursing GPs Doctors Andrew Lansley Conservatives Liberal-Conservative coalition Health policy Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cinema owners prepared not to screen blockbusters made by studios involved in premium VoD plan US cinema chains are threatening to banish some films from their screens in response to a contentious video-on-demand plan by several Hollywood studios to allow new releases into living rooms within weeks of their big screen debuts. Four of the six major film studios – Universal, Sony, Warner Bros and Fox – plan to make new releases available to rent online just two months after their cinema debut. New releases will be available to rent for $30 (£18) under the premium VoD proposals, set to be introduced in the US later this month. Cinema owners have reacted angrily to the plans, which could significantly reduce the box office potential of new releases . The National Association of Theatre Owners (Nato), which represents the largest cinema chains in the US including Regal Entertainment Group and AMC Theatres, said it will fight the move. John Fithian, chief executive of Nato, told the Financial Times on Tuesday that cinemas were prepared not to screen blockbusters made by studios involved in the premium VoD plan, such as Warner’s Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2. “Let’s say you’re Regal Cinemas and it’s a busy weekend with a couple of big pictures opening,” Fithian said. “If it’s 50-50 between this picture and that picture and you have a partner that respects your [business] model and another one that doesn’t, you’re going to give the screen to the partner that respects your model.” Fithian added that Regal and Cinemark, which own more than 7,000 cinemas in the US, had already begun to scale back promotion of films made by studios involved in the premium VoD venture. Sony’s Just Go With It, a comedy featuring Adam Sandler, will make history as one of the first films to be offered on the new on-demand service, according to the US entertainment trade magazine Variety. Film studios have long wanted to reduce the four-month period of exclusivity enjoyed by cinemas. It is seen as a way to offset a decline in physical DVD sales, while also helping to combat internet piracy and initiate a radical change in film buffs’ viewing habits. However, not all of the big six studios are on board. Fithian confirmed that Paramount Pictures has privately expressed opposition to the shorter window. It was previously reported that the studio behind Shutter Island and Jackass 3D had concerns over internet piracy. Paramount’s opposition could give it the upper hand when it goes head to head with rival studios this summer, with big-name releases like Transformers 3 and Super 8 set to go up against the final Harry Potter and Fox’s X-Men: First Class. Disney, the other Hollywood major, has yet to reveal its hand over the premium VoD plan. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . Video on demand Film industry Media business United States Digital video Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The best Southern writing that will ‘ride inside your blood vessels’ as selected by the acclaimed Virginia-born novelist Glenn Taylor was born and raised in Huntington, West Virginia. His first novel, The Ballad of Trenchmouth Taggart, was a 2009 National Book Critics Circle award finalist and acclaimed by Patrick McCabe in the Guardian as ” a galloping, defiant epic “. His second novel, The Marrowbone Marble Company, was published last month. Buy The Marrowbone Marble Company by Glenn Taylor from the Guardian bookshop “Last year, smack in the middle of the southern leg of my first real book tour, I was signing stock at Quail Ridge Books in Raleigh, North Carolina, which we can safely call the South. Quail Ridge is a wonderful little independent store with an impressive inventory. When I finished signing the stack of books, the store manager took them off to be shelved. I browsed. She called to me from two aisles over: ‘Do you want to be shelved in fiction or Southern fiction?’ I laughed. I thought of all the things I always think of when folks wonder about southern West Virginia’s regional designation. The civil war. Lincoln’s presidential decree. The creation of my home state in the year 1864. Violence. Blood. Cuisine, culture, storytelling. A slow ease to things. I answered her: ‘I’ll let you decide. I’m just happy to be here.’ “West Virginia is not the South. Yet, as soon as I write that, I have to question what South we’re speaking of. Are we talking about maps or music? Are we talking about parts of speech, burial custom, family gatherings, cornbread, religion? Coal or cotton? Hill or field? In the end, I get tired of thinking about it. I get tired of labels on literature, of categorising fiction by region or race, of trying to figure what Southern voices New York likes and doesn’t like. Yet, at times, I freely embrace such cataloguing. If Quail Ridge Books wants to stick my novel between those by Southern scribes, I’d be honoured. And so, I will participate. I will list my top 10 Southern books, but I’ll note that at least one may not be Southern, in some folks’ estimation. Each is a book that has, at one time in my life, sustained me as a reader and a writer. These books will ride inside your blood vessels. They’ll stick to your ribs.” 1. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee It may strike you as too obvious a choice, or too innocent, or too commonplace. Maybe I’m overly biased by the fact that my dad read it to me aloud, twice, when I was a young boy. In the end, it just feels right. It can be read again and again. The prose never breaks down under scrutiny. It is evident that the words were composed with great toil, over a vast stretch of time. The book is not, contrary to popular opinion, meant for children. It is for everyone. Everyone should read it. If my wife and I were to have a fourth child, and if that child were to be another boy (we have three boys already), I would insist that his name be Atticus Finch Taylor. I have lived long enough to know that when it comes to how we treat one another, adults can learn a great deal from children. Harper Lee’s book reminds us of this, and perhaps Dill best exemplifies this notion when he says, “I’m little but I’m old.” 2. Ava’s Man by Rick Bragg One day, maybe the banks of the world will trade not in money, but in stories. Bragg knows that stories are our most valuable collective currency, that they will outlive everything else, and he mines deep to tell the tale of his grandfather, whom he never knew. It is some of the best writing on a particular people and their particular place that you will ever come across. Bragg writes: “A man like Charlie Bundrum doesn’t leave much else, not title or property, not even letters in the attic. There’s just stories, all told second- and thirdhand, as long as somebody remembers. The thing to do, if you can, is write them down on new paper.” 3. Red Hills and Cotton by Ben Robertson This was published in 1942, and Robertson was killed in a plane crash in 1943. This was just the beginning for a writer who possessed the gift of the true storyteller. His memory and his connection to the old ways were both beyond impressive. He wrote: “The world to us is filled with sin, and for our souls there is a struggle that never stops. In the South we had rather save our souls than make a lot of money.” 4. Salvation on Sand Mountain by Dennis Covington Snake-handling. Most of us barely have a picture in our minds of what this activity might involve. We wonder who might do such a thing as pick up a serpent in church. Maybe we’re hip to good Texas music, and we know the song by the Gourds which goes, “Jesus Christ with signs following/ Serpents up in the air/ Hell-bent on heaven-bound/ your earthly end is near.” Dennis Covington goes where most of us never will, and he does things for the sake of real writing that most of us could never do. This book may have begun as journalism when, as a writer for the New York Times, Covington covered the attempted murder trial of a snake-handler, but it evolves into something else altogether. It is the real deal. 5. A Childhood: The Biography of a Place by Harry Crews What is memory? What is identity? How do the events of our childhoods shape what we become? These may seem pedestrian or cliched questions, but read Harry Crews’s memoir and see if you don’t consider such questions more deeply. Crews is a wildly misunderstood writer. His novels have perhaps been less than consistent. He’s enjoyed the drink and the dogfight and the bloodsport more than most. He’s awoken to find a hinge tattooed in the crook of his elbow. You’ll understand it all a little better when you read of his childhood in Georgia, where he was born to sharecropping and hog-butchering and unexplainable heartbreak again and again. I have a CD on which Crews says, “Stories was everything, and everything was stories.” Ain’t that the truth. 6. Hell at the Breech by Tom Franklin This book was immeasurably important in my development as a writer. It showed me that a relatively young author can call forth the past in such a way as to make the reader forget who wrote the words. It is raw, wise and real. It puts you squarely upon the bloodied Alabama ground of the 1890s Mitcham Beat war. My wife tried to talk to me as I was finishing it, and I ignored every word she said. I did not want it to end. 7. The Battle of Blair Mountain by Robert Shogun This is Appalachia. And maybe it’s the South, too. It will probably be shelved beside academic books because it is an exhaustively researched historical perspective on the coal mine wars in West Virginia in the 1920s. And maybe I am biased, as much of it takes place in my father’s hometown of Matewan. But know this: you’ll read it and realise that maybe you never truly knew the meaning of words such as “the Union” or “redneck” or “outlaw train” or “working class”. 8. Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston “Ships at a distance have every man’s wish on board.” It’s the kind of first line every writer wishes for. It reads as if destined, channelled by some ancient teller. It reads biblical. Much like Faulkner’s, Hurston’s magnificent book can be tainted by wildly varying political opinions, critical approaches and the like. And, again, as in Faulkner’s work, dialect is an easy target. This book was oft misunderstood before, and it will be misunderstood again. But it is beautiful and powerful, and it must be read. 9. As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner I don’t care to speculate on which of his works is great and which isn’t. I don’t presume to know what’s highbrow and what’s low-brow when it comes to Faulkner. Present tense and multiple, alternating points of view – none of that talk interests me either. The fact is, he wrote this book while everybody else slept. He wrote it at the Ole Miss power plant, where he worked as a night watchman, and he finished typing on January 12 1930, which is precisely 45 years to the day before I was born. Just listen to the words on the page. 10. The Complete Stories by Flannery O’Connor A debt is owed to O’Connor by anyone who has tried their hand at the short story. She is so much more than A Good Man is Hard to Find, and this book proves it. The stories remind us of the grace and violence in our little lives. Their mysteries boldly refuse to be analysed in some cold, academic manner. As O’Connor said, “In most English classes the short story has become a kind of literary specimen to be dissected. Every time a story of mine appears in a freshman anthology, I have a vision of it, with its little organs laid open, like a frog in a bottle.” We don’t dissect these particular stories. We enjoy them. Fiction Harper Lee Literary fiction United States American civil war guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Foreign secretary says Doha conference may ramp up sanctions and that intervention will end with Gaddafi’s departure Further sanctions could be imposed on Libya at the Doha conference, the foreign secretary, William Hague, has signalled, insisting that Colonel Gaddafi and his regime have become “pariahs in the world” and have no future in governing the country. With no immediate prospect that the Libyan leader is preparing to surrender, Hague suggested sanctions could be ramped up to force Gaddafi out as he prepared to co-host the conference on Libya in the Qatari capital. The UN, Arab League and EU will all be represented – as will France, Italy, Germany, Turkey and others – at a gathering billed as a follow-up by the “contact group” formed after the London conference on Libya last month. Wednesday’s conference is expected to be dominated by the rejection by the Libyan opposition of the African Union plan for a ceasefire and talks on a transition period with Gaddafi and his family staying in place – a position unacceptable to the opposition in Benghazi. British officials said Hague will reiterate demands for Gaddafi to step down and allow the Libyan people to determine their own future in line with UN security council resolutions. Hague told BBC Radio 4′s Today programme that while it was impossible to say “which week” the conflict in Libya would come to an end because of the “very fast moving and unpredictable situation”, it was “very clear” that the Gaddafi regime had to come to an end. Insisting that it was important not to underestimate what had been achieved as a result of military action, Hague said: “I think it is also clear that the Gaddafi regime has no future. The sanctions imposed at the United Nations, which we will discuss strengthening today, are among the toughest ever seen in the history of the United Nations. Large parts of their country are not under their control. They are pariahs in the world so there is no future for that regime. The question is when and how it unravels.” He cited the fall of the apartheid regime in South Africa as proof of how influential sanctions could be, though these took decades to help bring about change. On Libya, Hague said: “I think we can look to how it will end, it’s more difficult to say when it will end. It will end at some stage with the departure of Gaddafi, with a political process in Libya that is a more inclusive process.” Hague defended the military operation of the past few weeks, which he said had saved “thousands of lives”, but he said that Britain and France are now carrying “a lot of the burden” of the military operation, pointing to the scope for European and Arab nations to move aircraft from a defensive to a ground strike role against regime forces. Hague also defended the decision to allow Libya’s most high profile defector, foreign minister Moussa Koussa, to fly out of the UK on Tuesday to take part in the critical peace conference. Amid anger from Lockerbie campaigners and accusations of “betrayal” levelled at the British government, Hague refuted claims made by a Conservative colleague that Britain had become a “transit lounge for war criminals”, saying Koussa was free to move around while not under arrest. “It is right if somebody wants to leave such a murderous regime, and talk to other people who want to bring that regime to an end, it is ethically right that they are able to do so. It’s legally right to say you have no immunity at all.” Hague, who said he had only spoken to his former counterpart on the telephone since he arrived in the UK, said it was for the police and prosecutors to act if they believed they had cause to arrest him and prevent him from travelling. “We behave according to the law. The matter of arrests is for prosecuting authorities and police; that is not for ministers to decide,” he said. “He is not detained, he came here of his own volition. If he was under arrest, he wouldn’t be allowed to leave.” Agenda items at the international conference include plans for humanitarian aid and stabilisation assistance, with the UN’s Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs and the International Red Cross being tasked to deploy assessment missions in eastern Libya and rebel-controlled enclaves in the west such as Misrata, which is under siege by regime forces. Libya Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest William Hague Hélène Mulholland Ian Black guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Follow all the last developments from the courtroom as the former Home Office pathologist Freddy Patel, who concluded that Tomlinson died of a heart attack, continues to give evidence 10.21am: They jury has entered and we are about to begin. 10.00am: We’re about to start the second day of testimony from Dr Freddy Patel, the pathologist who concluded Ian Tomlinson died of a heart attack as a result of coronary artery disease. Two other pathologists concluded Tomlinson died of internal bleeding in the abdomen at the G20 protests, collapsing moments after he was struck with a baton and pushed to the ground by Metropolitan officer Simon Harwood around 7.20pm on April 1 2009. Yesterday Patel said a “process of elimination” led him to conclude Tomlinson, 47, had died of natural causes. The pathologist said that although he found a large amount of fluid in newspaper seller’s abdomen, it did not contain sufficient blood to lead him to believe internal bleeding had caused the death. He said he was also unable to find the cause of any bleeding. Patel also revealed that police who were present at the post mortem asked him to “rule out” whether Tomlinson had injuries consistent with an assault, and told him protesters “using sticks” were in the vicinity when he died. A senior detective also asked Patel while he was examining the body whether Tomlinson’s leg injuries were consistent with a baton strike and dog bite . This was on April 3 2009, so four days before the release of video footage showing Tomlinson’s encounter with police. Once again I’ll be live blogging all day. You can follow me on Twitter and you can email any questions or comments to me: paul.lewis@guardian.co.uk and I’ll do my best to respond. Ian Tomlinson Police London Protest G20 Dr Freddy Patel Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Surprise drop in total of people out of work to 2.48m • Women claiming jobseeker’s allowance at near 15-year high • Unemployed 16 to 25-year-olds down in January but up 12,000 on quarter Youth unemployment has remained at near record levels with more than one in five young people out of work, data released on Wednesday showed. The number of people aged between 16 and 25 who were out of work hit 963,000 in the three months to February – 12,000 more than in the previous quarter. This pushed Britain’s youth unemployment rate up by 0.1 percentage points to 20.4%. The number of unemployed 16 to 17-year-olds increased by 14,000 on the quarter to reach 218,000, while the number of unemployed 18 to 24-year-olds fell by 2,000 on the quarter to reach 745,000. The Office for National Statistics also reported that the number of women claiming jobseeker’s allowance has reached a near 15-year high of 462,300. The youth unemployment data was slightly better than a month ago. The total number of young people out of work, which is measured on a rolling three-month basis, had hit 974,000 in the three months to January , the highest level since records began in 1992. The ONS also reported a surprise fall in the number of people out of work. The UN’s International Labour Organisation (ILO) measure of unemployment showed that 2.48 million people were out of work in the three months to February, lowering the unemployment rate from 8% to 7.8%. But the number of people claiming unemployment benefit in March rose by 700. Campaigners have warned that Britain risks creating a “lost generation” of young people who are unable to find work. TUC general secretary Brendan Barber criticised the government today for scrapping the Future Jobs Fund, which provided grants to firms who created new jobs. Huddlebuy, a group buying websites for small businesses, reported today that two-thirds of small firms have delayed taking on new staff because of the uncertain economic conditions. Unemployment and employment statistics Economics Unemployment Public sector cuts Public sector pay Economic policy Graeme Wearden guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Rolling coverage of all the day’s political developments as they happen. 10.26am: Liz Kendall, a shadow health minister, is speaking now. She says that cancer test waiting times are already starting to rise and that cancer charities have said that services would suffer more under the plans in the bill. 10.23am: The Labour dossier should be on their website soon, but it’s not their yet. Tory HQ have already sent me an email asking for a copy so that they can prepare a rebuttal. 10.19am: Ed Miliband is here now. He says that he thinks David Cameron has not grasped the full scale of the challenge he faces. People are opposed to the bill because it undermines the principles of the NHS. He says the five points identified by Labour (see 10.03am) have been “largely hidden” from the public. They are all changes that would put the interests of patients last. 10.13am: Here’s the key quote from Ed Miliband. If the prime minister wants to listen, he should listen not to his deputy, but to the nurses, patients and others. He appears to believe that people don’t like his bill because his government hasn’t explained it properly. But the opposite is true. The more people understand and hear about these proposals, the less they like them. It’s not a problem of public relations. It’s a problem of principle. 10.03am: It’s the old dossier trick. Labour are releasing a 16-page dossier setting out “the hidden reality of David Cameron’s health reforms”. It identifies five main flaws in the bill. This is what they are, according to Labour. 1. There would be nothing to stop NHS hospitals going bust. 2. Hospitals would be subject to EU competition law, which means they could be fined up to 10% of turnover by the regulator. 3. There would be less accountability in relation to NHS services, which means NHS units could be closed without any consultation. 4. Hospitals would be allowed to give priority to private patients. 5. GPs would have the right to charge for services. Some of these claims are strongly contested. For example, Andrew Lansley has said the health bill does not extend the scope of EU competition law. But he’s going to have to provide a full rebuttal. The press conference should be starting soon. 9.39am: I’m just heading off to Ed Miliband’s press conference now. He set out his thoughts on the health bill in a speech two weeks ago. You can read it here, and a summary of it on my blog at 12.12pm here. Today, I expect, he will be trying to find some way of increasing the pressure on the government over this. We’ll find out soon. 9.32am: Here are the key points from the unemployment figures. • Unemployment fell by 17,000 in the three months to February to 2.48m. • The number of people claiming jobseeker’s allowance increased last month by 700 to 1.45m. • Average earnings increased by 2.0% in the year to February, 0.3% down on the previous month. Here is the Office for National Statistics summary of the figures. And here is its bulletin with the full details (pdf). 9.09am: William Hague started his interview on the Today programme with a sly swipe at the BBC. John Humphrys spoke to Jeremy Bowen, the BBC’s Middle East editor, just before the Hague interview started and Bowen suggested that there was no sign of the Gaddafi regime crumbling. Hague then said that Bowen was giving “the view from the regime”. Humphrys did not pick him up on it, but he seemed to be coming close to suggesting that Bowen was a stooge. As for the rest of the interview, here are the main points. I’ve taken the quotes from PoliticsHome. • Hague suggested that getting rid of Colonel Gaddafi was now the aim of the war. Ministers have always said that regime change is not the official goal of the operation, although they have always made it clear that this was an unofficial war aim because they have said that they cannot imagine Libya having a stable future with Gaddafi still in charge. Today Hague was even more explicit. Asked how the war would end, he replied: “It’s more difficult to say when it will end. It will end at some stage with the departure of Colonel Gaddafi, with a political process in Libya that is a more inclusive proves.” • Hague refused to say how long the war would continue. At one point, when asked to say how sanctions could bring down a regime, he said that this had happened with South Africa. • He defended the decision to allow Moussa Koussa to leave the UK. Koussa had not been arrested, Hague said. Whether he was arrested was a matter for the prosecuting authorities. Hague went on: “What we’ve said to Moussa Koussa. ‘You’ve got no immunity at all. You’ve come to the United Kingdom…you are at risk of the legal processes. You are not actually under arrest, you are free to move around.’” • Hague suggested he would like other members of the coalition to do more to support Britain, France and America in enforcing UN security council resolution 1973. “There is scope for some of [the other countries] to move some of their air defences into ground strike capability. That would increase our ability to intercept those forces – regime forces – that are killing the civilian population in Libya,” he said. 8.57am: Health is going to dominate today. Nurses at the RCN conference in Liverpool are due to hold a vote of no confidence in Andrew Lansley this morning. Ed Miliband is holding a press conference on health this morning, David Cameron and Lansley are holding a round-table discussion on the health reforms themselves this morning and this afternoon Lansley is going to Liverpool to hold a Q&A with nurses (but not to address the main conference). William Hague is co-chairing a meeting of the Libya Contact Group in Doha. On the Today programme earlier, he was more explicit than he has been before about the removal of Colonel Gaddafi now being the aim of the war. I’ll post a proper summary soon. First, though, here’s a full list of what’s coming up. 9am: Jeremy Hunt, the culture secretary, launches a new national arts campaign headed by the Art Fund. 9.15am: No to AV launches a new advertising campaign. 9.30am: Yes to Fairer Votes launches its own new advertising campaign. 9.30am: Unemployment figures are released. 10am: Ed Miliband holds a press conference about the health bill. 10am: Ed Davey, the business minister, launches a consumer empowerment strategy. 12pm: David Willetts, the universities minister, holds a briefing on student support arrangements for 2012-13. At some point we’re also due to get a statement from Eric Pickles, the communities secretary, about travellers occupying unauthorised sites and an announcement from Norman Baker, the transport minister, about street permits for roadworks. As usual, I’ll be covering all the breaking political news, as well as looking at the papers and bringing you the best politics from the web. I’ll post a lunchtime summary at around 1pm and an afternoon one at about 4pm. Ed Miliband Andrew Lansley David Cameron Health policy Health Andrew Sparrow guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …