Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1724)

Weird news from the land of Charlie Sheen: The troubled actor has managed to irk a group of 9/11 truthers, which is now threatening to protest in front of his live shows. Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement, who believe 9/11 was a conspiracy, feel Sheen has betrayed them. Sheen…

Continue reading …

Standard & Poor’s reaffirmed America’s AAA credit rating today, but dropped its outlook to “negative,” saying there was “material risk” that US policy makers wouldn’t figure out how to handle the nation’s fiscal woes by 2013. “If an agreement is not reached and meaningful implementation does not begin by then,…

Continue reading …

If Donald Trump decides to run for president, NBC plans to tell him he’s fired. The network hasn’t renewed The Apprentice yet, or done any serious planning about the next season, because it’s holding its breath to see if Trump will formally jump into the 2012 fray, the New York…

Continue reading …

Volkswagen has overhauled its iconic Beetle for the second time, introducing the new new version today. It’s the first refresh since 1998, when Volkswagen came up with the New Beetle, nearly two decades after the original Beetle was discontinued. The signature bulbous shape has been replaced with a flatter roof,…

Continue reading …
McChrystal ‘did not violate policy’

Evidence does not substantiate Rolling Stone article on former US and Nato commander that led to his sacking A Pentagon investigation has found insufficient evidence that General Stanley McChrystal , the former US and Nato commander in Afghanistan sacked by Barack Obama last year, violated military policy. McChrystal’s dismissal came after publication of an article in Rolling Stone, The Runaway General , which portrayed him and his inner circle as being out of control, and making contemptuous and dismissive remarks about the US civilian leadership. It also included a colourful account of a boisterous party in an Irish bar in Paris. The investigation expressed doubts about the version of some events reported in the article, written by Michael Hastings, who spent several days with McChrystal and his team. The investigation added that it could not substantiate some of the quotes. The investigation, carried out by the Pentagon’s office of inspector general , concluded: “The evidence was insufficient to substantiate a violation of applicable department of defense standards with respect to any of the incidents on which we focused. Not all of the events at issue occurred as reported in the article. “In some instances, we found no witness who acknowledged making or hearing the comments as reported. In other instances, we confirmed that the general substance of an incident at issue occurred, but not in the exact context described in the article.” The article, published in June last year, suggested that McChrystal was unimpressed with Obama at their first meeting, and that one of his team viewed the White House national security adviser, James Jones , as a clown. His team was also alleged to have been dismissive of vice-president Joe Biden and the late state department envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke. At the time, McChrystal apologised after the piece, saying it was a mistake reflecting poor judgment and should never have happened. He flew back to Washington to see Obama, who dismissed him, saying: “The conduct represented in the recently published article does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general.” The investigation’s conclusions open Obama to charges that he was too hasty in dismissing McChrystal. The former general, though no longer in the army, was partially rehabilitated last week when the White House invited him to join a panel to try to improve the life of military families. The new investigation is more favourable to McChrystal than an initial one published in August last year. There was no immediate response from either McChrystal or Hastings to the new findings. On some of the specifics, the investigation found no evidence that McChrystal made a middle finger gesture to another officer and concluded that, even if he had, this did not constitute a violation of standards. Dealing with another alleged comment, the investigation’s report said: “Witness testimony led us to conclude that the comment made by a staff member that a dinner event was ‘fucking gay’, or words to that effect, was made, but we could not identify the speaker. Witnesses testified that the comment was not directed toward any French official, or toward the French government or military.” No evidence was found that McChrystal said that he was disappointed with Obama on first meeting him. With regard to the behaviour of him and his staff at the Irish bar in Paris, Kitty O’Shea’s, the report said: “Our analysis of witness testimony led us to conclude that the behaviour of General McChrystal and his staff at Kitty O’Shea’s, while celebratory, was not drunken, disorderly, disgraceful, or offensive. Their conduct did not violate any department of defense standards.” It found no evidence that one of McChrystal’s team had called the White House national security adviser a clown. US military Afghanistan Nato Barack Obama United States Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Some 250 tornadoes wreaked havoc in the US last week, and—brace yourself—another possible wave of tornadoes may hit this week. Last week’s tornadoes killed at least 47 people across six states; now, a storm system heading east from the Rockies is threatening new snow, flooding, hail, and more…

Continue reading …
Voting reform: ‘yes’ camp reeling as support collapses

A new Guardian/ICM poll on the alternative vote referendum shows ‘no’ campaign is 16 points ahead Support for a change to the way MPs are elected is collapsing, according to the latest Guardian/ICM poll, sending shockwaves through the yes campaign advocating reform to the voting system. The figures give the no camp a 16-point lead, wiping out a two-point lead for the yes camp in the equivalent Guardian/ICM poll in February. Among people who say they are likely to vote in the nationwide referendum on the alternative vote on 5 May and have made up their minds, the poll shows 58% saying no and 42% saying yes. Among all respondents, 44% back no and 33% yes, with 23% saying they don’t know. The findings prompted soul-searching among the yes campaigners over their tactics in the runup to the referendum. Some pointed to the fact that they were being outspent by the no campaign and facing a battle against its supporters in the rightwing press. However, there were no initial signs of panic or calls for a change in strategy. The Guardian/ICM poll came on the day David Cameron cast aside political allegiances to join the former Labour home secretary Lord Reid to claim a change from first past the post would be a backward step for Britain. The prime minister said it would damage the chain of political accountability by making coalitions more likely. He dismissed the system as “obscure, unfair and expensive”. At the same time the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, shared a platform with the Liberal Democrat business secretary, Vince Cable, to argue the referendum is coming down to a choice of hope over fear. Miliband is not going to share a platform with Nick Clegg throughout the campaign. The Guardian poll suggests opinion is hardening against the alternative vote. A Guardian/ICM poll in December put the yes vote six points ahead, before adjusting for likely turnout. In February the two camps were neck and neck on the same measure, and now – again before turnout is taken into account – the no vote is 11 points ahead. The poll, showing a much larger lead for the no campaign than in other polls, is the first for two months to use a random sample by telephone, rather than an online panel, and the results have been adjusted to take account of turnout. Uniquely, the latest poll also includes a sample of voters from Northern Ireland, which is included in the UK-wide referendum. ICM posed the same question that will be asked in the referendum: “At present, the UK uses the first past the post system to elect MPs to the House of Commons. Should the alternative vote system be used instead?” Pro-AV campaigners had hoped that people who wanted change would be more likely to turn out on polling day. Instead once people are asked how likely they are to vote, the lead for the no camp actually increases. A senior Lib Dem minister acknowledged the tightening in the race, pointing to the increasing propaganda coming out of the Murdoch press. He added the campaign faced a strategic dilemma over how to fight the no campaign’s negative tactics. The minister said: “You could end up looking like the no campaign and people will think it is a just a bunch of politicians arguing with one another, when we are offering a different kind of politics. You cannot have Colin Firth and Helena Bonham Carter getting down and dirty with Eric Pickles and Sayeeda Warsi”. Ben Bradshaw, the chairman of the Labour Yes campaign, said: “I always thought it was going to be tough because of the unpopularity of Nick Clegg and referendums are just difficult to win because the presumption is to vote no. “We were also always going to be outspent, but I am still confident that when people look at the issues, a new politics, a fairer voting system and a more accountable system, we will win. When people look at who is lined up on either side of this argument they will vote yes. “We have come under a lot of pressure in the yes campaign to go negative, but I think the strength of our campaign is that it is positive. “It is fair to point out that the no campaign is a Tory campaign, funded by Tory money but we must keep making the positive argument. We have just have to keep banging on because there are still large numbers of people undecided.” Other senior yes figures said uncertainty about turnout rendered opinion polls unreliable and claimed the ground campaign established recently would get the yes vote out on the day. The Guardian poll shows three-quarters of Conservatives planning to vote will opt for no, as will a small majority of Labour supporters. Only Lib Dem voters are firmly in favour, with more than two-thirds saying they will vote yes. The yes camp could still turn things around by winning over the 23% who say they are unsure how they will vote – but this figure includes many who say they may not turn out at all. The poll also shows young people are more than twice as likely to favour AV as pensioners. But pensioners are more than twice as likely to vote as the young. Cameron said at his press conference on Monday he would accept the referendum result. If he lost he would not allow diehards no campaigners in his party to block the reform by delaying the constituency boundary changes that must precede a change to the voting system. One Tory MP, Eleanor Laing, said the legitimacy of a yes vote would be questioned if there was a derisory turnout. Cameron also insisted he did not “condone any personal attacks” on Clegg and pointed out that his own Conservative Yes Campaign literature did not feature any. But Lord Reid seized on the inability of Clegg and Miliband to share a platform, claiming that it was the yes campaign’s “biggest handicap”. The Guardian poll also shows Labour has regained a narrow lead over the Conservatives. The estimated national voting intentions put Labour on 37%, up one. The Conservatives are on 35%, down two and the Lib Dems on 15%, down one but still higher than in most online polls. Support for other parties was a combined 13%, a recent high in ICM polls. ICM Research interviewed a random sample of 1,033 adults across the United Kingdom aged 18+ by telephone on 15-17 April 2011. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults. Voting intention based on British sample of 1,003 people Alternative vote Electoral reform David Cameron Vince Cable Ed Miliband John Reid Labour Conservatives Liberal Democrats Liberal-Conservative coalition Julian Glover Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

A man wearing an Afghan army uniform opened fire inside the Defense Ministry today, killing at least two soldiers before being gunned down himself. A Defense Ministry spokesperson first called the attacker an Afghan soldier, then backtracked; he may have been a Taliban infiltrator, the AP reports. The Taliban claimed…

Continue reading …

Just because he’s royalty doesn’t mean Prince William wants to be left out of the viral wedding video craze. AdWeek points to a new ad from T-Mobile imagining a royal wedding complete with Wills, bride-to-be Kate Middleton, Charles and Camila, the Queen, Prince Harry, and a variety of very sophisticated-looking…

Continue reading …
Bwin.party and 888 see shares soar

UK online gaming companies see big wins as American competitors face illegal gambling charges Shares in UK online gaming companies have soared after the websites of some US rivals were shut following a government crackdown on illegal gambling. Bwin.party shares shot up 30%, with Playtech and 888 Holdings up 8% and 19% respectively, as investors bet on high-value players, affiliates and processors switching to safer sites. The big wins for the European companies, which do not operate in the US, followed moves by the US government on Friday to charge the founders of three of the world’s largest online poker companies. In what amounted to the most drastic crackdown on electronic gambling since Congress banned the industry in America in 2006, the government accused the creators of Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars and Absolute Poker of illegal gambling, money laundering and bank fraud. Execution Noble analyst Geetanjali Sharma said: “The US-facing operators have been a drain on the profitability of the European operators as their US liquidity drew the non-US poker players. At the same time these operators diverted cash gained from the US operations to gain market share in the regulating territories in Europe. The closure of the main competitors’ operations and the US legal proceedings initiated against them should benefit European listed operators.” While non-US players can still play poker on the banned sites, the disruption and seizure of funds could make it difficult for the operators to continue and may drive some punters to rival operators. In the world of online poker, the more players a site has, the more attractive it becomes to new players, as it is easier for them to find games with the appropriate level of stakes and payouts. The liquidity argument has worked in favour of the sites that have operated illegally in the US since 2006. In January 2007, PokerStars and Full Tilt together accounted for about 30% of the market, but that had doubled before last week’s crackdown, according to gambling data provider H2 Gambling Capital. However, Simon Holliday, a director at H2, advised caution, saying: “The market always overshoots. There may be a transfer of accounts to the likes of [Bwin.party's] PartyPoker, but this will occur over time.” Analysis by poker monitoring website PokerScout.com suggested that traffic to PokerStars has dropped by 25% over the past week, while Full Tilt slumped 48%. Conversely, the number of visitors to PartyPoker and 888 increased by 8% and 5% respectively. Meanwhile on Saturday, Las Vegas casino group Wynn Resorts cancelled the deal it had struck with PokerStars just three weeks ago, while Fertitta Interactive, the owner of Station Casinos, also pulled out of its recently announced deal with Full Tilt. Analysts now expect European operators to aggressively pursue similar deals with the major casino operators in preparation for the long-awaited regulation of the US gambling industry. Michael Caselli, editor of trade magazine iGaming Business, said: “I think for [Wynn and Fertitta] it’s a case of once bitten, twice shy. I think they will do these deals, but there won’t be anything until we see some serious regulation.” The US move represents a stark change of fortune for UK-listed poker operators. Bwin.party, which was created from the merger of Bwin and Party Gaming, and whose shares began trading on the London Stock Exchange at the end of March, saw its stock slump in its first week as a combined group, on news of a proposed new betting tax regime in Germany. Meanwhile, 888 was hit last week by the withdrawal of bookmaking group Ladbrokes from protracted takeover talks. Gambling Poker Internet Technology sector Simon Goodley guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …