Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1703)

Charlie Sheen isn’t still winning. The actor yesterday failed to win sole custody of his twin sons from estranged wife Brooke Mueller in a Los Angeles court, sources tell ABC News . Mueller—who has reportedly returned to rehab for treatment of a drug problem—will maintain primary custody of the…

Continue reading …
Why my love is Justified

The unheralded series set in Kentucky returns to Five USA. Don’t miss this curious mix of folksy charm and ultraviolence Subtly brilliant but largely unheralded in the UK, one of the best shows on TV returns quietly to Five USA tonight. Based on characters from the Elmore Leonard short story Fire in the Hole, Justified stars Timothy Olyphant as US marshall Raylan Givens, a modern western gunslinger with a simple philosophy “I don’t pull my sidearm unless I intend to shoot to kill. That’s its purpose, to kill, so that’s how I use it.” So pulling a piece on Raylan? Never a good idea. Marshalling back in Harlan County, Kentucky where he grew up, Givens is a returning son with roots buried so deep in Harlan he fears he may never leave. Many hope he never does. New York Daily News has called Justified “the best dramatic series on TV”, Olyphant has been compared to a young Clint Eastwood and FX has already renewed it for a third season as its audience steadily grows. Taken at face value, it’s just another show about a maverick cop who plays by his own rules so why all the plaudits? For a start, there’s the acting. Walton Goggins (Shane Vendrell from The Shield) as Boyd Crowder is a revelation. Making the pyromaniac white supremacist religious nut sympathetic is a tall order but Goggins harnesses just the right mix of charisma, charm and vulnerability to make it impossible to hate him. You can’t take your eyes off him when he’s on screen. Goggins was the standout performer of the first series but he meets his match this series in Margo Martindale, stunning as Mags Bennett, fearsome matriarch of the Bennett clan – warmly maternal one moment, cutthroat vicious the next. Mags is a product of her environment, just like Boyd, Raylan and everyone else in Harlan. The show really couldn’t be set anywhere else because Justified is about how growing up in a poor white mining community puts its stamp on you. Raylan can’t escape who he is – everyone he deals with watched him grow up. They know his daddy is a criminal, that his family have been feuding with the Crowders like the Hatfields and McCoys for generations, that policing in Miami didn’t work out after he killed a man. In Harlan County, you’re an open book whether you like it or not. Tonight’s show picks up the action directly from the end of series one so there are some loose ends to tie up before we are introduced to the focus of series two, Mags and her sons – “reefer farmers” (pot growers) looking to expand the family business. Strike up a conversation with Mags and she’s as sweet, worldly and wise as they come and it’s one of the striking features of the show that everyone, no matter how depraved, is so damn polite. It’s rare that gunfights are not accompanied with “how’s your momma?”. Small talk and the curious mix of folksy charm and ultraviolence helped make it the slow burner hit of 2010. It’s oddly reminiscent of Heartbeat, drawing on a nostalgic desire for community policing where everyone knows who you are, folk look out for each other and people matter. It deserves a wider audience. If you’re new to Justified you should be able to pick up what’s what in Harlan with few problems – many of the characters will be as new to existing fans as they are to you (although, there will obviously be some series one spoilers dotted round). Fans of Elmore Leonard’s sparse punchy dialogue will find it well emulated here and the 85-year-old crime fiction legend is so impressed with the adaptation he’s written a new book featuring Raylan Givens, sections of which will be used in the series. If you believe in great American character acting then this is a show you shouldn’t miss as no one is currently doing it better. And, 10 episodes into the second series, there’s no TV I look forward to more. • Justified starts tonight, 10pm, 5USA US television Television Drama James Donaghy guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Oil stories: Gone to Water

A year on from the Deepwater Horizon disaster, this specially-commissioned story is set in Louisiana, where Pa Claude and Jackie are going out fishing on the bayou The dawn looked more like a sunset. The horizon was a luminous peach-colored line, and rising above it were gray commas of cloud with copper bottoms, each the size of a small town. The old man came onto his back porch holding a cup of coffee and looked east over the sound, his great grandson dawdling behind, hands in his pockets, a willowy boy of nine. Claude Ledet was eighty-eight, his skin a sun-eroded fabric of pale craters and burgundy spots. He looked down to his little wharf hugging the island. “We goin fish today, down to the mouth of the river.” “The river?” The boy’s voice sailed high in the question. “The Mississippi,” his great grandfather snapped. “Don’t you know nothing?” The boy grinned, goofy and sweet. “I know it’s a long way off, Pa Claude. For your boat.” The old man turned west, looking for weather. Sometimes he would see what was there, sometimes his mind would layer memories over the present, and he would see what was there last year, or the decade before that, or sixty years earlier when he’d built his little frame house high up on pilings. The day before, he’d seen the big wooden oyster lugger The Two Sons go by, loaded down, and he’d waved at his cousins Henry and Rene where they sat on the deck sorting what they had dredged up from their lease, even though Henry and Rene had been dead of old age for many years and The Two Sons lay sunk and rotting in Lake Borgne. Sometimes he saw things from several different decades at once, steam tugs, coastal sail boats, brand new Chris Craft mahogany yachts, jet skis carrying windblown children racing above the swells, time-wandering images floating side-by-side and overlapping like a bowl of fresh shucked oysters. Claude looked down at the boy. “Why you here?” “Aunt Brenda couldn’t come stay with you today. She’s at the doctor with the flu.” “That oldest girl couldn’t come?” “Suzie?” “That’s right. So many come around to visit with me I can’t keep ‘em straight.” The boy gave him a long look. “Great-aunt Suzie’s your daughter.” The old man nodded west. “Get two rods off the porch and my box. I’m goin bail the skiff.” “Her friend’s husband got killed in that rig accident about three weeks ago. It’s a big mess out in the Gulf.” “My radio’s burnt out and that damn television don’t make no sense to me at all.” “Everybody’s talking about it. You haven’t heard?” Claude put a hand to his stubbly chin. “We need some crackers and potted meat and a jug of water.” The boy settled a baseball cap down on his curls. “I didn’t know we were going fishing.”

Continue reading …

A murderer is suing California, demanding the state pay for his sex change operation and move him to a safer women’s prison. The state has provided Lyralisa Stevens, who lives as a female, with sex hormones since 2003 when he began a 50 year-to-life sentence for shooting a woman in…

Continue reading …
Fire safety flaws linked to 14 deaths

Sheriff principal says management of fire safety at Rosepark was ‘systematically and seriously defective’ Fire safety procedures at a care home for the elderly where an electrical fire claimed the lives of 14 residents were “systematically and seriously defective”, a fatal accident inquiry has ruled. In a 1,000 page report published after Scotland’s longest running FAI, sheriff principal Brian Lockhart detailed a series of safety defects at the Rosepark care home in Uddingston, Lanarkshire, that he said contributed to the deaths of the 14 elderly residents in January 2004. Some or all of the deaths could have been prevented if the home had had a suitable fire safety plan in place, he found. The fire broke out in a cupboard of the care home. Ten of the residents died at the scene, and four subsequently died in hospital. The eldest was 98 and the youngest 75. In his report the sheriff principal said staff at the home had not been properly trained in fire safety and fire drills, the maintenance of the electrical installation where the fire broke out was defective, and the management of fire safety at the home was “systematically and seriously defective”. Three of the staff on duty on the night of the fire had been shown a fire safety video once but apart from that none of the staff on duty had received any fire training or experienced a fire drill at the home, and none had been trained to use a fire extinguisher. The sheriff principal said: “The way the staff responded on the night of 31 January 2004 was just what might be expected of staff who had not received adequate fire training and who had, by reason of exposure to false alarms, become complacent. Had the staff been properly trained in a matter consonant with the task that would face them in that emergency situation, they would have behaved quite differently and that, either on its own, or in conjunction with other changes which would have been put in place had the system of fire safety management not been defective, would have avoided some or all of the deaths.” The report noted that vital time was lost when staff took nine minutes to call the fire brigade. The home’s practice meant a member of staff had to find the source of the blaze before calling 999. There was an extra delay of just over four minutes when the fire brigade went to the wrong entrance to the home because the postal address was different. The elderly residents who died were: Dorothy McWee, 98, Tom Cook, 95, Isobel MacLachlan, 93, Julia McRoberts, 90, Annie Thompson, 84, Helen Crawford, 84, Margaret Lappin, 83, May Mullen, Helen Milne, Anna Stirrat, and Mary McKenner, all 82, Robina Burns, 89, Isabella MacLeod, 75, and Margaret Gow, 84. The sheriff principal said that since the fire the lessons of the tragedy had been taken on board by the management of the home and the deficiencies identified “substantially eradicated”. A spokesman for the owners of Rosepark care home said: “Our legal team is studying the determination issued by sheriff principal Brian Lockhart. We have nothing further to add at present.” An attempt to prosecute the home’s owners over alleged safety breaches collapsed in 2007 after a judge dismissed the charges. A second case raised in 2008 was also dropped. The report also found deficiencies in the working of Lanarkshire Health Board with regard to identifying fire risks at the home. The board was responsible for inspecting the Rosepark home between 1992 and 2002. In a statement, NHS Lanarkshire said it would need time to study the report and extended its deepest sympathies to the families and friends of those who died. “While we do not currently have any defined responsibility for fire safety within the independent care sector, in light of the determination we will ensure owners of establishments that we contract with are fully aware of their responsibilities in this area,” the statement added. Scotland Kirsty Scott guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Tesco buys into VoD firm BlinkBox

Supermarket giant acquires 80% of video-on-demand firm in bid to take on services such as Amazon’s LoveFilm Tesco has entered the UK video-on-demand market, taking an 80% stake in BlinkBox and creating a formidable competitor for existing services such as Amazon’s LoveFilm. The supermarket giant, which on Tuesday reported profits of £3.8bn , said the acquisition of the five-year-old UK VoD business would help position the business for “the next stage in the internet-driven revolution in home entertainment”. Tesco has acquired its stake in BlinkBox, set up by former Channel 4 and Vodafone executives in 2006 and launched two years later, from Eden Ventures and Nordic Venture Partners for an undisclosed sum. BlinkBox offers a range of films and TV shows as free and paid-for downloads, with a catalogue including Shameless, Peep Show and Top Gear. The UK’s biggest retailer has a huge operation selling “physical” DVDs. However, Richard Brasher, chief executive of Tesco’s UK operation, admitted it needed to exploit the growing consumer demand for accessing VoD content online in multiple formats and on different devices. “Whether customers want to own the DVD, download a digital movie, stream a rental or all three, Tesco is committed to giving customers choice,” he said. “We want to allow them to decide how they access entertainment content and on which devices, whether it’s on PC, TV or tablet.” BlinkBox offers more than 9,000 films and TV shows available on devices including the PC, Macs, the PS3 console, tablets and internet-enabled TVs. The company has content licensing deals with broadcasters and producers such as BBC Worldwide, Channel 4, ALL3Media and FremantleMedia for shows including Peep Show, Shameless, How to Look Good Naked, Doctor Who, Baywatch, Danger Mouse and Count Duckula. BlinkBox also has deals with major US studios and networks including Warner Bros — two of the most watched shows are Gossip Girl and ER — Paramount, Discovery Networks, Universal and 20th Century Fox. “We are pleased that our partnership with Tesco allows us to bring the best in entertainment from our library of over 9,000 titles to even more people across the UK,” said BlinkBox founder Michael Comish. “This partnership represents another step forward, bringing the leading movie streaming service together with the UK’s biggest retailer.” Amazon acquired the 58% of LoveFilm, the DVD and online video rental company often dubbed “the Netflix of Europe”, it did not already own in January in a deal thought to value the business at £200m. Tesco’s BlinkBox deal has been compared to a similar move made by supermarket giant Walmart , which owns the Asda chain in the UK, which acquired US VoD service Vudu in February last year. Video on demand Amazon.com Digital media Media business Internet Tesco Television industry Television Television Mark Sweney guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

With deficit reduction on the agenda and America’s corporations sitting on a record amount of cash, Democrats and Republicans have found something they agree on: It’s time to slash the corporate tax rate. Bipartisan support is building for plans to eliminate many loopholes and tax breaks and use the savings…

Continue reading …
AV vote is not about me, says Clegg

Liberal Democrat leader’s comments come amid fears his unpopularity will hit support for alternative vote in 5 May referendum Nick Clegg has insisted people are not “daft” enough to oppose AV on the basis that they do not like him. The Liberal Democrat leader’s comments came amid fears that his unpopularity will hit support for the alternative vote in the 5 May referendum. With nine days to go until the poll, the no campaign – which is using imagery of Clegg in material to mobilise its vote – has taken a decisive lead . The latest YouGov poll for the Sun newspaper, published on Wednesday, shows a 16-point lead for the campaign against a switch to AV, with 5% of respondents saying they would vote no because a party or politician they dislike supports the change. Fears the referendum will be used to send a message to the Lib Dems – who are most strongly associated with it – prompted the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, a supporter of AV, to urge voters not to use the poll as an opportunity to give the deputy prime minister a “kicking”. “This referendum is not about Nick Clegg, it’s not about David Cameron, it’s not about me,” Miliband said. “It is a chance to have a better politics in Britain.” Speaking two days after Miliband’s remarks, Clegg dismissed the suggestion that people’s decision on whether to back a switch from first past the post to AV will come down to him. He told BBC Breakfast: “I really don’t think that people are so daft that, when they’re asked to have this once in a generation opportunity to change the electoral system, they’re going to do it based on what they think about one party or one politician.” Another issue plaguing Clegg is his comment that AV is a “miserable little compromise” – made before the Lib Dems secured the AV referendum in their coalition deal with the Conservatives in May. To the frustration of the yes campaign, the claim has repeatedly been quoted by opponents of change to the voting system, including Cameron. Clegg claimed his remark did not refer to the voting system itself but to the previous Labour’s government’s attempt to shoehorn in a promise of AV that had little chance of being delivered. He said: “I’ve had this a lot. What I was actually referring to was Gordon Brown’s suggestion, very late in the day in his government, of making changes that everyone knew would not come into effect … “I was talking about the Labour party’s offer in the latter days of its government which it had no way of implementing.” On AV, Clegg said the use of different kinds of preferential voting system had been adopted by the Conservative party itself – the bulk of whom are in the no camp. “If it’s good enough for them, why is it not good enough for the rest of the country?” Clegg asked. He said he “flatly” disagreed with the argument put forward by the no campaign that AV was favoured by the Lib Dems because they would be the party most likely to benefit from the system. “It’s impossible to tell how millions of people across the country will vote when they’re given more choice,” he added. Seeking to spell out AV’s merits, he said: “It’s a very simple idea that you order your preferences. “If you can’t get your number one choice, at least you get to have a say about which other one might still go forward. “It’s about increasing people’s voice – at the moment, millions of people are ignored. “It’s a simple statement of principle that, in a democracy, you should make your MPs work harder for your vote and try and get at least majority support in their local election. That, in a nutshell, is what AV does.” Clegg made his comments amid deepening tensions between the coalition parties ahead of the referendum for AV. Lord Ashdown, the Lib Dem peer and former party leader, said the way Clegg was being singled out in a “deeply and appallingly personal” way by a no campaign funded by the Conservative party was “very damaging”. “It must be making Liberal Democrats fighting furious, and I am certainly one of those,” he said. Nick Clegg Alternative vote AV referendum Electoral reform Liberal Democrats Ed Miliband Labour Conservatives David Cameron Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
All universities will charge at least £6,000 fees

• Blow to ministers as watchdog announces universities’ plans • Guardian figures put average fees at more than £8,600 • Datablog: what are the universities charging? Ministers have suffered a major blow to their tuition-fee reforms after the government’s access watchdog revealed that all universities intend to charge at least £6,000 a year. The Office for Fair Access (Offa) announced that every one of the 123 universities and university colleges in England intend to charge £6,000 or more to full-time undergraduates from autumn 2012. A further 17 further-education colleges – out of 124 – want to charge fees of more than £6,000. Universities had until midnight on Tuesday to submit their plans to the watchdog. Offa would not say how many of the institutions want to charge the maximum fee of £9,000. However, research by the Guardian has revealed that almost three-quarters of English universities and university colleges intend to charge this amount for at least some of their courses. The figures will come as an embarrassment to David Willetts, the universities minister, who predicted that universities would charge different levels of fees and that the average would be £7,500. He later revised that to £7,500-£8,000. The Guardian’s figures show the average fee of those that have made their plans public currently stands at £8,629.73. Some 49 of the 73 universities intend to charge a flat rate of £9,000. Some 56 institutions intend to charge £9,000 for at least some of its courses. MPs voted in December to raise tuition fees for full-time undergraduates from £3,350 a year to £6,000 in 2012 and up to £9,000 in “exceptional cases”. But new and old universities have announced plans to charge £9,000. In the last few days Bradford, Bristol and Hull universities have said they want to charge the maximum. Oxford Brookes and University of East London – neither of which are in the top 40 universities according to the Guardian’s university league table – intend to charge a flat-rate of £9,000. The University Centre at Blackburn College has decided to set its fees at £7,000. Some 73 out of 123 universities or university colleges have now publicly declared their fees. Some 50 others have given their proposals to Offa privately. The Treasury is faced with a funding black hole because the initial cost of students’ fees is borne by the government. It pays the fee for each student in the form of a loan. The government then recovers its money once a student has graduated and is earning more than £21,000. Labour said on Tuesday that one way for the government to claw back the higher upfront cost would be to cut student numbers. Ed Miliband, the leader of the Labour party, warned that at least 10% of university places for undergraduates would have to be cut to fund the coalition’s “unravelling” tuition fee reforms. This is the equivalent of removing 36,000 full-time places each year. Universities that want to charge more than £6,000 had to tell Offa what their targets were to widen their pool of students beyond white middle-class teenagers. These must be agreed by the watchdog. Offa has the power to tell universities that they cannot charge more than £6,000 and will be able to tell institutions next year that they must lower their fees because they have not fulfilled their targets. The government has recommended that universities spend £1,000 out of every £9,000 received in fees on support for students. The watchdog will announce in July whether it has accepted each university’s plans for 2012. Some universities, such as Coventry, intend to charge variable fees based on the cost of delivering their courses. Coventry wants to charge £7,500 for classroom-based degrees; £7,900 for studio and field trip-based degrees; £8,300 for lab-based degrees and £9,000 for specialist degrees such as engineering, fashion and automotive and transport design. Meanwhile, it has emerged that overseas universities are redoubling their efforts to recruit English students to their universities. Paul Loftus, managing director of i-studentgroup, which helps universities in the UK, Australia, Canada, the US and New Zealand with their recruitment, said foreign universities were targeting the UK. “If overseas universities haven’t started lifting their recruitment efforts to try to get British students, they are now.” Loftus said more British students than in the past were considering going abroad for university, in part because of higher fees. “Although the Australian dollar is strong, many British teenagers are enrolling on courses in Australia, Canada and New Zealand in particular.” Aaron Porter, the NUS president, predicted that 10% of university applicants would be put off studying for a degree because of the higher fees. “Sadly we are hearing that some students are deciding not to apply already. We hope this sends out an urgent message to the government that their tuition fee policy is in disarray.” The number of students who want to travel or work abroad for a year before going to university has dropped by almost half, The Times has reported. Tuition fees University funding Higher education Students Education policy Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

An executive accused of illegally profiting from inside knowledge of his company’s promising new cancer drug jumped to his death from an airport parking garage in New Jersey. Zizhong Fan, manager of clinical programming at Seattle Genetics, is believed to have shared insider information on clinical trials involving the company’s…

Continue reading …