The next generation of the iPhone is coming, but not until September, sources tell Reuters . News recently surfaced that Apple probably won’t announce its newest phone in June as it normally does; now it looks like production of the new iPhone will begin in July or August and the device…
Continue reading …WikiLeaks suspect will be held in ‘more open’ military facility in Fort Leavenworth, with three hours of recreation a day The family of Bradley Manning has welcomed news that he has been moved from a top security military prison in Quantico, Virginia, to a “more open” military facility in Kansas. Manning, the US soldier accused of downloading and leaking classified cables to WikiLeaks, was transferred to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, early on Wednesday, his aunt, Sharon Staples, confirmed. His transfer follows sustained protests from human rights campaigners and others over his conditions at Quantico, where he was held in solitary confinement and on suicide watch, which has required him to be stripped naked at night apart from a smock and checked on repeatedly. The commander of the Kansas facility said Manning would now receive three hours of recreation a day, and would “have the capability to interact with other pre-trial inmates on a routine basis”. Psychiatrists would assess his mental, physical, emotional and spiritual health on arrival, Lt Col Dawn Hilton said. Joseph Westphal, undersecretary of the army, said: “The place where he will reside, it’s more open. He’s got more space, more ability to interact with other prisoners. He will eat with them … it is a place where if you’re going to be confined for a longer period of time, you have the ability to interact. You have the ability to exercise, to move around.” Staples, who is the sister of the soldier’s Welsh mother Susan Manning, said it would be a “big, big relief” if the soldier were to be held in more open conditions. “This is what we hoped, that he would be moved from there to a better place where he could mix with other inmates.” While expressing some caution until they knew more, she said: “It would be such a relief for us, especially for his mother, if his conditions were improved.” The move would make visiting the soldier more difficult for his British-based family, she said, “but he’ll be closer to his father and his sister [who live in Oklahoma], so he’ll get more visitors.” The Foreign Office has confirmed that although Manning does not hold a UK passport he is British by descent. The UN special rapporteur on torture, Juan Mendez, has been investigating whether Manning’s treatment to date amounted to “cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment” or torture. But Jeh Johnson, the Pentagon’s most senior lawyer, said: “Many will be tempted to interpret today’s action as a criticism of the pre-trial facility at Quantico. That is not the case. We remain satisfied that Pte Manning’s pre-trial confinement at Quantico was in compliance with legal and regulatory standards in all respects, and we salute the military personnel there for the job they did in difficult circumstances.” The facility at Fort Leavenworth, said Johnson, was “appropriate to meet Private Manning’s health and welfare needs”, given the likelihood that he will remain in custody for months before his case reaches trial. Manning has been charged with more than 20 offences in relation to the alleged leak, including “aiding the enemy”, which could carry the death penalty. David E Coombs, the soldier’s lawyer, said he had learned of Manning’s imminent move from a leak to a reporter. Manning’s defence team have filed a writ arguing that the conditions at Quantico violated his “constitutional right to due process”. Writing on his website, Coombs said while he hoped the move to Fort Leavenworth would result in better conditions, Manning “nonetheless intends to pursue redress … for the flagrant violations of his constitutional rights by the Quantico confinement facility”. Staples said the soldier’s mother, when she last visited her son in Quantico in February, had been shocked by her son’s condition and worried about his health. She said she believed the move was as a result of the campaign over her nephew’s conditions. Bradley Manning WikiLeaks Human rights United States Esther Addley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …WikiLeaks suspect will be held in ‘more open’ military facility in Fort Leavenworth, with three hours of recreation a day The family of Bradley Manning has welcomed news that he has been moved from a top security military prison in Quantico, Virginia, to a “more open” military facility in Kansas. Manning, the US soldier accused of downloading and leaking classified cables to WikiLeaks, was transferred to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, early on Wednesday, his aunt, Sharon Staples, confirmed. His transfer follows sustained protests from human rights campaigners and others over his conditions at Quantico, where he was held in solitary confinement and on suicide watch, which has required him to be stripped naked at night apart from a smock and checked on repeatedly. The commander of the Kansas facility said Manning would now receive three hours of recreation a day, and would “have the capability to interact with other pre-trial inmates on a routine basis”. Psychiatrists would assess his mental, physical, emotional and spiritual health on arrival, Lt Col Dawn Hilton said. Joseph Westphal, undersecretary of the army, said: “The place where he will reside, it’s more open. He’s got more space, more ability to interact with other prisoners. He will eat with them … it is a place where if you’re going to be confined for a longer period of time, you have the ability to interact. You have the ability to exercise, to move around.” Staples, who is the sister of the soldier’s Welsh mother Susan Manning, said it would be a “big, big relief” if the soldier were to be held in more open conditions. “This is what we hoped, that he would be moved from there to a better place where he could mix with other inmates.” While expressing some caution until they knew more, she said: “It would be such a relief for us, especially for his mother, if his conditions were improved.” The move would make visiting the soldier more difficult for his British-based family, she said, “but he’ll be closer to his father and his sister [who live in Oklahoma], so he’ll get more visitors.” The Foreign Office has confirmed that although Manning does not hold a UK passport he is British by descent. The UN special rapporteur on torture, Juan Mendez, has been investigating whether Manning’s treatment to date amounted to “cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment” or torture. But Jeh Johnson, the Pentagon’s most senior lawyer, said: “Many will be tempted to interpret today’s action as a criticism of the pre-trial facility at Quantico. That is not the case. We remain satisfied that Pte Manning’s pre-trial confinement at Quantico was in compliance with legal and regulatory standards in all respects, and we salute the military personnel there for the job they did in difficult circumstances.” The facility at Fort Leavenworth, said Johnson, was “appropriate to meet Private Manning’s health and welfare needs”, given the likelihood that he will remain in custody for months before his case reaches trial. Manning has been charged with more than 20 offences in relation to the alleged leak, including “aiding the enemy”, which could carry the death penalty. David E Coombs, the soldier’s lawyer, said he had learned of Manning’s imminent move from a leak to a reporter. Manning’s defence team have filed a writ arguing that the conditions at Quantico violated his “constitutional right to due process”. Writing on his website, Coombs said while he hoped the move to Fort Leavenworth would result in better conditions, Manning “nonetheless intends to pursue redress … for the flagrant violations of his constitutional rights by the Quantico confinement facility”. Staples said the soldier’s mother, when she last visited her son in Quantico in February, had been shocked by her son’s condition and worried about his health. She said she believed the move was as a result of the campaign over her nephew’s conditions. Bradley Manning WikiLeaks Human rights United States Esther Addley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Sudan leader condemns court for ‘lies’ over genocide charges • Britain accused of pursuing regime change • Critics say he targeted millions in civil war President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan has said for the first time that he accepts full personal responsibility for the conflict in Darfur that left tens of thousands of people dead. But in an exclusive interview with the Guardian, his first with a western news organisation since he was charged with genocide by the international criminal court (ICC), Bashir accuses the UN-backed court of “double standards” and conducting a “campaign of lies”. Britain and other western countries were pursuing a politically motivated vendetta against him with the ultimate aim of forcing regime change in Sudan as well as in neighbouring Libya, he said. “Of course, I am the president so I am responsible about everything happening in the country,” Bashir said when asked about the conflict in Darfur, in western Sudan, where fighting is continuing despite international peace efforts. “Everything happening, it is a responsibility. But what happened in Darfur, first of all, it was a traditional conflict taking place from the colonial days. “As a government we fought the ones who were carrying arms against the state, but also some of the insurgents attacked some tribes … so we had human losses. But it is not close to the numbers being mentioned in the western media, these numbers are in fact being exaggerated for a reason,” he said. “It is a duty for the government to fight the insurgents, but we did not fight the people of Darfur.” The UN estimates up to 300,000 people died and about 2.7 million were internally displaced as a result of fighting between government forces and their Janjaweed militia allies and the separatist rebel groups in Darfur that peaked in 2003-4. Sudan’s government says about 10,000 people died and about 70,000 were displaced. An international outcry prompted a UN investigation that led the security council to refer the case to the ICC in 2005. In March 2009 Bashir became the first serving head of state to be indicted by the ICC, on seven counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes. Three counts of genocide were added in July last year, accusing Bashir in his capacity as president and commander-in-chief of the Sudanese armed forces. Bashir denies all the charges and has refused to surrender to the court. John Prendergast, co-founder of the Enough Project, a leading anti-genocide pressure group based in Washington, dismissed Bashir’s justification of his policy in Darfur. “In my eight trips to Darfur since 2003, the overwhelming evidence demonstrates that a government-sponsored counter-insurgency targeted non-Arab civilian populations by destroying their dwellings, their food stocks, their livestock, their water sources and anything else that would sustain life in Darfur,” Prendergast said. “Three million people have been rendered homeless as a direct result of government policy, not tribal fighting or global warming.” The ICC describes the arrest warrant as “pending” but Bashir said the case against him was wholly political. Sudan was not a party to the ICC treaty and could not be expected to abide by its provisions, he said. This was also the case with the US, China and Russia. “It is a political issue and double standards, because there are obvious crimes like Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan, but [they] did not find their way to the international criminal court,” he said. “The same decision in which [the] Darfur case [was] being transferred to the court stated that the American soldiers [in Iraq and Afghanistan] would not be questioned by the court, so it is not about justice, it is a political issue.” Bashir launched a fierce personal attack on Luis Moreno Ocampo, the ICC’s chief prosecutor since 2003, who he said had repeatedly lied in order to damage his reputation and standing. “The behaviour of the prosecutor of the court, it was clearly the behaviour of a political activist not a legal professional. He is now working on a big campaign to add more lies,” he said. “The biggest lie was when he said I have $9bn in one of the British banks, and thank God, the British bank and the [British] finance minister … denied these allegations. “The clearest cases in the world such as Palestine and Iraq and Afghanistan, clear crimes to the whole humanity – all were not transferred to the court.” Louise Arbour, a former UN high commissioner for human rights and Hague war crimes prosecutor, said: “The crimes committed against millions of civilians in Darfur cannot simply be shrugged off. If Bashir wants to argue that he was not responsible for the atrocities, he should go to The Hague and make his case there.” Turning to Libya, Bashir criticised the US, Britain and France for their military intervention, saying their motives were questionable and their actions risked destabilising Sudan and the wider region. Their undeclared aim in Libya and Sudan was regime change, he said. But Khartoum would not offer sanctuary to the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, whose removal from power has been demanded by western powers, he added. “This would cause trouble with the Libyan people which we don’t need,” he said. “We know that Libya is an important country, it has an important location and long coast on the Mediterranean sea which is facing Europe. In addition to that, the resources of Libya like petrol make it important to other countries like France, Britain and Europe in general. “It is important for them to see a regime in Libya that would be, if not loyal, friendly toward those countries. “Regarding us, they [the US, Britain and France] were trying to change the regime in Sudan since 20 years, this is not new news for us. “We say about the Europeans, we have noticed some positive change in their situation regarding the way they deal with Sudan. The US is being polarised by different power centres, influential power centres inside the US. They are still aiming to change the regime in Sudan.” Asked how the “Arab spring” uprisings might affect Sudan, where Arabic speakers comprise a large majority of the northern population, Bashir said the small protests calling for increased democracy lacked broad support. “It will not have an impact like what happened in Egypt, Tunisia or even Libya, I don’t think so.” A reform process was already underway, he said. Omar al-Bashir Darfur Sudan War crimes International criminal court International criminal justice Luis Moreno-Ocampo Simon Tisdall guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Apparently, dropping the beef-related lawsuit wasn’t quite enough to satisfy Taco Bell. Pat’s Papers points to a full-page ad the fast food company took out in today’s USA Today , asking for an apology from the law firm that filed the suit. It says, in part, “As for the lawyers who…
Continue reading …The Obama administration has drafted an executive order that would force all companies seeking government contracts to disclose their donations to groups airing political ads, as part of a multi-pronged attack on the kind of anonymous campaign spending Republicans walloped Democrats with last year. The FEC is also moving to…
Continue reading …The deadly rioting following Nigeria’s presidential election has gotten worse: Mobs yesterday ran the streets of Kaduna, which separates the country’s Muslim north from the Christian south, burning homes, churches, and police stations and leaving charred bodies in the streets. The AP reports that Muslim rioters started the violence, some…
Continue reading …Hetherington, co-director of Oscar-winning documentary Restrepo, killed and three journalists injured in Misrata Photographer Tim Hetherington has been killed covering the escalating violence in the Libyan city of Misrata while three other western journalists have been injured. Hetherington, 40, the British photographer and co-creator of Oscar-winning documentary Restrepo, was killed in Misrata on Wednesday. Hetherington is believed to be the first western journalist killed covering the Libyan conflict. Chris Hondros, 41, a US Pulitzer prize-winner who works for Getty Images, and British photographer Guy Martin, who works for the Panos agency, were critically injured in the same incident, according to a New York Times report . The fourth photographer injured was reported by the New York Times to be Michael Christopher Brown, although his condition was not said to be life threatening. Hetherington posted on Twitter on Tuesday : “In besieged Libyan city of Misrata. Indiscriminate shelling by Qaddafi forces. No sign of NATO.” According to colleagues at the scene, Hetherington and Hondros were among a group of about eight or 10 journalists reporting from the bridge on Tripoli Street in Misrata on Wednesday afternoon, regarded as the frontline between rebels and Gaddafi’s forces. When shooting broke out, the group split in two. Hetherington’s group of five journalists took shelter against a wall, which was then hit by mortar or RPG fire. Rushed to hospital, Hetherington died soon after arrival. Heavy explosions in Misrata continued into the evening. André Liohn, a colleague of the photographers who said he was at the hospital in Misrata where the photojournalists were taken, wrote on his Facebook page on Wednesday afternoon: “Sad news Tim Hetherington died in Misrata now when covering the front line. Chris Hondros is in a serious status.” The death comes as foreign observers, including United Nations officials and press freedom bodies, voice growing concerns over violence against the media in Libya. Four journalists have now been killed in Libya since the conflict began in January. The al-Jazeera cameraman Ali Hassan al-Jaber was killed when fighters ambushed his car as he travelled to the eastern city of Benghazi on 12 March. Mohammad Nabbous, the Libya al-Hurra TV reporter, was killed in a firefight seven days later in Benghazi. The Committee to Protect Journalists said about 10 journalists have been killed covering the Arab spring uprisings this year – out of 14 deaths worldwide. The international criminal court warned Libyan authorities about the treatment of journalists in the country on Wednesday. Around 16 journalists are missing in the country, according to ICC prosecutor José Luis Moreno Ocampo. The UN said on Wednesday that the Libyan government’s reported use of cluster munitions and heavy weapons in Misrata may amount to war crimes, which the ICC has said it will investigate. Eight people, mostly civilians, were killed in the coastal city on Tuesday. Liverpool-born Hetherington won numerous awards for his coverage of conflict zones, including Afghanistan, Liberia, and Nigeria. His latest work, the war documentary following a platoon of US troops in Afghanistan, Restrepo, won the best documentary feature Oscar earlier this year. Hetherington co-directed Restrepo alongside journalist and author Sebastian Junger. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . War reporting Libya Middle East Journalist safety Documentary Josh Halliday Xan Rice guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …South Carolina didn’t exactly roll out the red carpet for devout Tea Partier and possible GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann yesterday. Only around 300 people—including political operatives and members of the media—turned up at a Tax Day rally in Columbia, about a tenth of the number the event…
Continue reading …It Needs Horses should never have galloped away with the audience vote, still less the UK’s biggest choreography prize. Maybe it’s time for AV? So there I was the other night, at the finals of the Place prize for dance – the UK’s biggest choreography competition – and my guest, a Paris-based producer of considerable experience, turned to me and said: “I have a bad feeling about this.” She was worried that the piece we both ranked lowest – Ben Duke and Raquel Meseguer’s It Needs Horses – would win the £25,000 prize. Nah, I said, it won’t come to that. Shortly afterwards, it came to that. Should I have been surprised? Over nine of the 10 nights of the finals, the audience vote – worth £1,000 in prize money each time – had already gone to It Needs Horses, which is a pretty clear indication of the people’s choice. The fact that the judging panel selected the same piece was surely a simple vindication of that choice: it deserved to win, and there was a consensus on that. Actually, there was little consensus. The judges for the final – five representatives from different fields (Hannah Barry, visual arts; Zena Edwards, poetry; Rupert Goold, theatre; Matthew Peacock, opera; Laurie Uprichard, dance) – disagreed vociferously over the decision. The final verdict was not the outcome of consensus, but of a battle. There was, however, consensus within – but not between – two other arenas. One was in the judging panel for the semi-finals, where everyone had a dance background (Laurie Uprichard again, Alistair Spalding of Sadler’s Wells, choreographer/artistic directors Janet Smith and Shobana Jeyasingh, and me). That panel was near-unanimous in selecting its top three to put forward to the finals, and It Needs Horses was not in the running. The fourth finalist was selected by the other consistent locus of consensus: the audience. As in the final round, the semi-finals saw It Needs Horses win the audience vote by a considerable margin. Dance critics, meanwhile, had no consensus with anyone. The Telegraph favoured Frauke Requardt and Freddie Opoku-Addaie. The Independent liked It Needs Horses, but the Guardian’s Judith Mackrell thought it “shockingly lazy”. The Observer , Guardian and Time Out rated Eva Recacha top (while in the audience vote she regularly vied for last place with Riccardo Buscarini and Antonio de la Fe Guedes). And dismissing the lot of them, theartsdesk.com basically wished for something, anything, that was a bit more like Ashton ‘s Cinderella, a ballet created in 1948. Me? I thought the considerable stage presence of the two performers (Chris Evans and Anna Finkel) masked a fatal lack of substance in the work itself; that it went for cheap thrills (some sex, violence, some titters); and – call me elitist, now – that in the end the audience voted for the work that most set out to manipulate them. Dissent, popular opinion, vote-courting, competition – this is clearly a political arena. And right now, we’re very aware that political winners and losers aren’t some straightforward reflection of democracy in action, but at least partly produced by the voting systems that elect them. The Place prize is certainly not all about winning or losing: as a seedbed for new ideas and a launchpad for new work, it affords many benefits simply for participating. But there is money and publicity at stake, and there is a final winner announced. And right now I wonder: should the Place prize forgo its winner-takes-all system and adopt something more like AV ? Would that reveal dissent more strongly, or would it favour middle-ground compromises? Results would certainly change simply by being measured differently. Perhaps some entries would too. Dance Awards and prizes Sanjoy Roy guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …