More than 160 police raid squat occupied by opponents of new Tesco Metro in Stokes Croft area Eight police officers have been injured after a riot erupted in Bristol overnight, sparked by a raid on a squat occupied by opponents of a newly opened Tesco Metro store. More than 160 officers in riot gear, reinforcements from neighbouring forces and officers on horseback were involved in the operation, which began shortly after 9pm. Four people have been arrested, Avon and Somerset police said, because they posed “a real threat to the local community” in the Stokes Croft area of the city. Petrol bombs were found, the force said. “Police arrested three people on suspicion of public order offences and another person on suspicion of threats to cause criminal damage with intent to endanger life.” Superintendent Ian Wylie added: “There have been several significant incidents in this building during the past few days, which have caused serious concerns to police and local residents. “The safety of the public is paramount in a situation of this kind and we took the decision to carry out a robust and swift operation, following intelligence received about the criminal intentions of those who were occupying the building.” Clashes began when lines of officers closed off Cheltenham Road, a main route into the city centre, and protesters began throwing bottles at them. The disturbances continued through the evening and up to 4am on Friday. Many in the local community had objected to the opening of a new Tesco store on Cheltenham Road and the shop was severely damaged in the riot. The area is close to the St Paul’s area, where some of Britain’s first inner-city riots erupted in 1980. Assistant Chief Constable Rod Hansen said: “When 300 people congregated and a small minority from that group started small fires and throwing bottles, stones and other items at officers, we used well-rehearsed plans, which involved the use of officers from neighbouring forces to control what had become a volatile situation.” Eight police officers and a number of protesters were injured. None of the injuries are believed to be serious. Duncan Birmingham, an arts lecturer who lives nearby, told the Guardian he had seen lines of police in riot gear. “There were police horses and police vans from Wales,” he said. “There was a crowd who had put rubbish bins across the road and were throwing bottles. “But there were also people going to nightclubs, dressed up in party gear. Tesco has been trashed. The windows have been put in and there’s paint everywhere. There’s been massive opposition to Tesco opening . The store had been boarded up until it opened last week. There’s another Tesco about half a mile away in each direction.” Clare Milne, who lives nearby and has been organising the planning campaign against the store, said she had not been told why there was a police raid on the squatted building. “Our campaign has been peaceful but we have been telling the police and the council that if they go ahead and open [the supermarket] this is what will happen. Our community is well known for having people who if they are silenced will act in a way that will ensure they will be heard.” Police Protest Tesco Supermarkets Retail industry Owen Bowcott guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …US senator meets opposition leaders in Benghazi as Barack Obama authorises use of armed Predator drones US senator John McCain, one of Congress’s most vocal supporters of military intervention in Libya, said rebels fighting Muammar Gaddafi’s troops were his heroes and praised their efforts to overthrow the dictator. The most senior Republican on the Senate armed services committee made the remarks during a visit to Benghazi yesterdayon Friday, before a meeting with opposition leaders to assess the situation on the ground. He is the most senior US official to visit the rebel-held eastern city. McCain’s trip comes as the defence secretary, Robert Gates, announced that Barack Obama has authorised the use of armed Predator drones against Gaddafi’s forces. It is the first time drones will be used for airstrikes since the US handed control of the operation to Nato on 4 April. The rebels had complained that allied airstrikes under Nato were largely ineffective in halting Gaddafi forces. McCain called for US military intervention in Libya in February, weeks before the UN security council authorised military action to protect civilians and impose a no-fly zone. When Obama acted with limited congressional consultation, McCain defended the president, saying he could not wait for Congress to take even a few days to debate the use of force. If he had “there would have been nothing left to save in Benghazi”. But when the US handed operational control to Nato – and withdrew combat aircraft – McCain criticised the administration. “For the United States to withdraw our unique offensive capabilities at this time would send the wrong signal,” he said. The US must not fail in Libya, he added, saying he spoke as someone experienced in a lost conflict, a reference to his time as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. McCain has also pushed for the arming of rebels, saying the US and its partners cannot allow Gaddafi to consolidate his grip on key areas of the country and create a military deadlock. Libya John McCain Muammar Gaddafi United States Middle East Obama administration US politics guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …US senator meets opposition leaders in Benghazi as Barack Obama authorises use of armed Predator drones US senator John McCain, one of Congress’s most vocal supporters of military intervention in Libya, said rebels fighting Muammar Gaddafi’s troops were his heroes and praised their efforts to overthrow the dictator. The most senior Republican on the Senate armed services committee made the remarks during a visit to Benghazi yesterdayon Friday, before a meeting with opposition leaders to assess the situation on the ground. He is the most senior US official to visit the rebel-held eastern city. McCain’s trip comes as the defence secretary, Robert Gates, announced that Barack Obama has authorised the use of armed Predator drones against Gaddafi’s forces. It is the first time drones will be used for airstrikes since the US handed control of the operation to Nato on 4 April. The rebels had complained that allied airstrikes under Nato were largely ineffective in halting Gaddafi forces. McCain called for US military intervention in Libya in February, weeks before the UN security council authorised military action to protect civilians and impose a no-fly zone. When Obama acted with limited congressional consultation, McCain defended the president, saying he could not wait for Congress to take even a few days to debate the use of force. If he had “there would have been nothing left to save in Benghazi”. But when the US handed operational control to Nato – and withdrew combat aircraft – McCain criticised the administration. “For the United States to withdraw our unique offensive capabilities at this time would send the wrong signal,” he said. The US must not fail in Libya, he added, saying he spoke as someone experienced in a lost conflict, a reference to his time as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. McCain has also pushed for the arming of rebels, saying the US and its partners cannot allow Gaddafi to consolidate his grip on key areas of the country and create a military deadlock. Libya John McCain Muammar Gaddafi United States Middle East Obama administration US politics guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Environmental groups fear oil industry is not prepared for potentially catastrophic impact of oil spills in the Arctic The fight to stop the global oil industry exploring the pristine deep waters of the Arctic has been dubbed the new cold war, and early on Friday it escalated as environmental activists from 12 countries occupied the world’s second largest rig on its way from Turkey to Greenland to drill among the icebergs. The protesters found the 52,000-tonne semi-submersible platform Leiv Eiriksson at around midnight, steaming due west at a stately six knots in the sea of Marmaris, heading for the Dardanelle straits and the open Mediterranean. It took four more hours for Greenpeace to bring in its inflatables and a further 50 minutes in the choppy moonlit sea to intercept it. Even from three miles away, the Chinese-built mobile rig, which specialises in drilling in extreme environments, looks huge. From 100ft away in the pale dawn light it is a 15-storey industrial castle, bristling with cranes, derricks, gangways, chains, spars, girders, pipes, helipads and radar. Just 10 years old, it is already rusting and its paintwork is streaked from years of drilling in harsh west African, north Atlantic and Asian waters The Greenpeace boats approached the vessel cautiously in the three foot swell, like fleas to the backside of an elephant. At exactly 5.31am, the 11 climbers began to leap on to its hull and headed for a ladder. The plan was to stop the vessel in its tracks not by taking over the bridge, but by radioing the captain and asking politely. Fat chance. “This is Greenpeace, this is Greenpeace. I’m informing you that we have put climbers on your rig. I ask you stop your vessel”, asked Korol Diker, a Turkish campaigner, on a VHF channel. But the elephant barely registered. “I do not recognise you”, came the captain’s cutting reply and the Leiv Eiriksson steamed on. Undaunted, the climbers made it to a gangway 80ft over the vessel’s starboard stern. As four crewmen peered over the side from 30ft above them, and two more ambled over, seemingly unconcerned, the climbers made a cat’s cradle of rope to hang banners and a tent from. You can understand why the captain did not want to stop. The Scottish oil company Cairn Energy has hired the Leiv Eiriksson for around $500,000 a day and the company, run by Sir Bill Gammell, the former international rugby player, plans to spend more than $500m (£300m) in the next few months looking for oil in some of the most dangerous and coldest waters in the world. Any major delay could cost it millions and set back its plans for the Arctic by a year, because drilling is only possible in the July-October “summer window” when the ice has retreated. Cairn, which will be the only company to drill deep wells offshore in the Arctic this year, holds 11 licences in Baffin Bay covering over 80,000 square kilometres. It plans to drill four exploratory wells to depths of around 5,000ft, the deepest ever attempted in the Arctic. It is taking the Leiv Eiriksson and the Ocean Rig Corcovado – a drill ship now stationed near Aberdeen – as well as a fleet of backup vessels. Last year the company claimed it had struck oil in Baffin Bay after drilling several 300ft wells. But it later admitted that it had found no significant quantities . The venture, say environmentalists, is just the start of what is planned to be a risky offshore oil rush. Shell, Exxon Mobil, Chevron and others have licences to explore in Baffin Bay, mostly above the Arctic circle. Others, including BP and Rosneft, plan to extract oil offshore from Siberia, Alaska and elsewhere in the Arctic. The US government estimates there are 90bn barrels of oil, around 13% of the world’s undiscovered reserves. But for Greenpeace and others the risk of a devastating spill is is too great, raising the spectre of the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska in 1989 when more than 1m barrels of oil were spilt, and the $40bn disaster in the Gulf of Mexico last year . “Any Arctic spill would be very difficult, if not impossible, to contain and clean up. The company has not released a detailed spill response plan for the Arctic waters. Its latest environmental impact assessment says it has not been possible to model oil behaviour on ice. Failing to consider the impact of ice on a potential Arctic oil spill renders the EIA [the US Energy Information Administration] unfit for purpose,” said Greenpeace campaigner Ben Ayliffe. Other leading environment groups, including the respected US thinktank Pew , plus NGOs Oceana and WWF, have all said that the oil industry is not prepared for a major pollution incident. “This is the most controversial rig in the world because it is the only one destined to begin risky offshore drilling in the very deep waters of the Arctic this year. We have stopped it because it’s blazing a trail for other major oil companies and sparking the start of a dangerous new Arctic oil rush.” Cairn, which could not be contacted, says it has prepared comprehensive oil spill plans, and has put up a bond of $2bn. Activists are now expected to dog the progress of the slow-moving Leiv Eiriksson as it passes Greece, Italy, France and Spain on its passage through the Mediterranean and into the Atlantic. The platform is scheduled to stop in Britain to pick up supplies before the last leg of its journey to Greenland in June. Oil Energy Oil spills Fossil fuels Oil Greenpeace Activism Arctic Cairn Energy Energy industry Royal Dutch Shell Exxon Mobil Chevron BP John Vidal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Environmental groups fear oil industry is not prepared for potentially catastrophic impact of oil spills in the Arctic The fight to stop the global oil industry exploring the pristine deep waters of the Arctic has been dubbed the new cold war, and early on Friday it escalated as environmental activists from 12 countries occupied the world’s second largest rig on its way from Turkey to Greenland to drill among the icebergs. The protesters found the 52,000-tonne semi-submersible platform Leiv Eiriksson at around midnight, steaming due west at a stately six knots in the sea of Marmaris, heading for the Dardanelle straits and the open Mediterranean. It took four more hours for Greenpeace to bring in its inflatables and a further 50 minutes in the choppy moonlit sea to intercept it. Even from three miles away, the Chinese-built mobile rig, which specialises in drilling in extreme environments, looks huge. From 100ft away in the pale dawn light it is a 15-storey industrial castle, bristling with cranes, derricks, gangways, chains, spars, girders, pipes, helipads and radar. Just 10 years old, it is already rusting and its paintwork is streaked from years of drilling in harsh west African, north Atlantic and Asian waters The Greenpeace boats approached the vessel cautiously in the three foot swell, like fleas to the backside of an elephant. At exactly 5.31am, the 11 climbers began to leap on to its hull and headed for a ladder. The plan was to stop the vessel in its tracks not by taking over the bridge, but by radioing the captain and asking politely. Fat chance. “This is Greenpeace, this is Greenpeace. I’m informing you that we have put climbers on your rig. I ask you stop your vessel”, asked Korol Diker, a Turkish campaigner, on a VHF channel. But the elephant barely registered. “I do not recognise you”, came the captain’s cutting reply and the Leiv Eiriksson steamed on. Undaunted, the climbers made it to a gangway 80ft over the vessel’s starboard stern. As four crewmen peered over the side from 30ft above them, and two more ambled over, seemingly unconcerned, the climbers made a cat’s cradle of rope to hang banners and a tent from. You can understand why the captain did not want to stop. The Scottish oil company Cairn Energy has hired the Leiv Eiriksson for around $500,000 a day and the company, run by Sir Bill Gammell, the former international rugby player, plans to spend more than $500m (£300m) in the next few months looking for oil in some of the most dangerous and coldest waters in the world. Any major delay could cost it millions and set back its plans for the Arctic by a year, because drilling is only possible in the July-October “summer window” when the ice has retreated. Cairn, which will be the only company to drill deep wells offshore in the Arctic this year, holds 11 licences in Baffin Bay covering over 80,000 square kilometres. It plans to drill four exploratory wells to depths of around 5,000ft, the deepest ever attempted in the Arctic. It is taking the Leiv Eiriksson and the Ocean Rig Corcovado – a drill ship now stationed near Aberdeen – as well as a fleet of backup vessels. Last year the company claimed it had struck oil in Baffin Bay after drilling several 300ft wells. But it later admitted that it had found no significant quantities . The venture, say environmentalists, is just the start of what is planned to be a risky offshore oil rush. Shell, Exxon Mobil, Chevron and others have licences to explore in Baffin Bay, mostly above the Arctic circle. Others, including BP and Rosneft, plan to extract oil offshore from Siberia, Alaska and elsewhere in the Arctic. The US government estimates there are 90bn barrels of oil, around 13% of the world’s undiscovered reserves. But for Greenpeace and others the risk of a devastating spill is is too great, raising the spectre of the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska in 1989 when more than 1m barrels of oil were spilt, and the $40bn disaster in the Gulf of Mexico last year . “Any Arctic spill would be very difficult, if not impossible, to contain and clean up. The company has not released a detailed spill response plan for the Arctic waters. Its latest environmental impact assessment says it has not been possible to model oil behaviour on ice. Failing to consider the impact of ice on a potential Arctic oil spill renders the EIA [the US Energy Information Administration] unfit for purpose,” said Greenpeace campaigner Ben Ayliffe. Other leading environment groups, including the respected US thinktank Pew , plus NGOs Oceana and WWF, have all said that the oil industry is not prepared for a major pollution incident. “This is the most controversial rig in the world because it is the only one destined to begin risky offshore drilling in the very deep waters of the Arctic this year. We have stopped it because it’s blazing a trail for other major oil companies and sparking the start of a dangerous new Arctic oil rush.” Cairn, which could not be contacted, says it has prepared comprehensive oil spill plans, and has put up a bond of $2bn. Activists are now expected to dog the progress of the slow-moving Leiv Eiriksson as it passes Greece, Italy, France and Spain on its passage through the Mediterranean and into the Atlantic. The platform is scheduled to stop in Britain to pick up supplies before the last leg of its journey to Greenland in June. Oil Energy Oil spills Fossil fuels Oil Greenpeace Activism Arctic Cairn Energy Energy industry Royal Dutch Shell Exxon Mobil Chevron BP John Vidal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Jury found that the Barbie toymaker had stolen trade secrets from a smaller rival, MGA Entertainment The Bratz dolls have beaten Barbie in a plastic cat fight of epic proportions. A US jury has found that Barbie toymaker Mattel had stolen trade secrets from a smaller rival, MGA Entertainment, and awarded the house of Bratz $88.4m (£53.5m). The battle of the dolls has been ongoing since 2006 and the verdict will come as a bitter blow to Mattel. Both sides have spent millions of dollars fighting over the rights to the controversial line of bestselling pouty-lipped dolls that became a global phenomena. Mattel had argued that the dolls’ designer Carter Bryant developed the Bratz concept while working for it in the late 1990s and secretly took the idea to MGA. MGA denied the claims and countersued, accusing Mattel of corporate espionage, using spies with fake business cards and dummy invoices to gain access to MGA’s ideas. MGA also accused Mattel of threatening to scupper business deals with retailers and media firms if they did business with Bratz. Bryant has always argued he came up with the idea for Bratz while living with his parents, in between stints working for Mattel. Multi-ethnic and trendy, the Bratz styled themselves as “the girls with a passion for fashion!” They became a huge hit in the mid-2000s, making $1bn in annual revenue at the height of their popularity, spawning real life clothes ranges and even a movie in which four actors struggled like “colour-blind drag queens” to “replicate their plastic precursors’ range of expression,” according to the Guardian review. The dolls also sparked a furious debate about the sexualization of young girls. But it was the impact on Barbie’s bottom line that had Mattel reaching for their lawyers. Mattel said in court that the more demure Barbie had lost more than $300m in profit as a result of the Bratz dolls’ success. The case has been in and out of court for years. The original trial in 2008 found in favour of Mattel and awarded the company $100m in damages. The trial judge also ordered MGA to turn over the Bratz franchise to Mattel. But in July 2010, an appeals court in San Francisco threw out the original decision after deciding the value of the Bratz line had “overwhelmingly” been created by MGA and that the original decision had failed to take into account all the development that had gone into the line after Bryant’s original creation. The jury in the latest trial considered both Mattel and MGA’s claims and concluded that Mattel did not own the idea for the Bratz line or any of the sketches that led to their creation. Isaac Larian, chief executive of MGA, cried while listening to the verdicts. Last autumn MGA celebrated the 10th anniversary of the Bratz line with the release of a new generation of slightly less pouty dolls. The latest incarnation has generated only lacklustre sales. Barbie has seen a bounce-back in sales, although Mattel has seen revenues eaten up by legal costs. United States Intellectual property Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A trip to the Suffolk coast takes on a new urgency when Dughan decides the time is right for a night-time adventure in this exclusive story from China Miéville There were a few nights in Dunwich, where the owner of the B&B kept telling her guests they were lucky to have found a room. Walking Dunwich Beach, showing his daughter wintering geese through binoculars so heavy they made her laugh, the man was glad they were not in Southwold or Walberswick. They were not so hemmed in by visitors. Each evening they had fish and chips or pub grub. Each night after she had gone to bed he hacked into next door’s wifi to check his messages and monitor the forums. On Thursday night he woke her. It was not long after midnight. ‘Come on lovey,’ he said. ‘Keep it down. Let’s not get anyone else up.’ ‘I hate you,’ she said into her pillow. ‘I know,’ he said. ‘Come on. Don’t bring your phone.’ There was not much on the roads. Still, Dughan took them roundabout ways, through Blythborough, on the A145 towards Uggeshall, past still diggers where roads were being widened. ‘Where are we going?’ the girl asked, only once. She hunkered; she wouldn’t ask him to turn up the heating. Wrentham was on the western rim of the security zone. It went north along the A12, south on the B1127 to Southwold. Within it, in daylight, fields were still worked, for animal feed, and roads mostly open, but those were, legally, indulgences not rights; the area was, in the absence of an official escort, no-go after dark. Exceptional laws applied in that little triangle, the coast a 6-mile hypotenuse, its midpoint Covehithe. Dughan stopped by a pub garden south of Wrentham. He opened the door for his daughter with his finger to his lips. ‘Dad,’ she said. ‘Hush,’ he said. It was overcast and windy, shadows taking them and releasing them as Dughan found a way through undergrowth to the boundary ditch. They were both quiet as they crossed it. Holding their breath. Beyond, they walked eastward on the edges of the fields. ‘Dad, seriously, you’re crazy.’ He had a torch but did not turn it on. When the moon came out enough he stopped and took bearings. ‘They’ve got guns,’ she said. ‘That’s why shhh.’ ‘What’ll they do if they catch us?’ ‘Feed us to wolves.’ ‘Har har.’ They went still at the sound of a helicopter. The beam passed by half a field ahead, so bright it looked solid. The air smelt. They could hear echoes. Dughan avoided the hamlet where until recently locals had lived, which had been requisitioned, with only minor scandal. They could see lit windows. They came instead at Covehithe from the north. He stopped her by the roofless ruin of the church, pointed, heard her gasp. She stared while moonlight got past the clouds to the holed and broken walls, onto a low newer church inside the nave of the old. He smiled. When eventually she was done looking they continued through the graveyard. There was nothing at all frightening about the graves. This close to the waves the land felt, as the girl said, misbehavicious. A good word to make her feel better. In the leafless trees of this region were cold, random and silent flares of light. Touch the soil, as Dughan did, and as his daughter did too at the sight of him, and it felt greasy, heavy, as if someone had poured cream onto loam. ‘Which way are we going?’ ‘Careful lovey,’ he said. ‘The ground here…’ ‘How do you know it’s tonight?’ For a while he didn’t answer. ‘Oh,’ he said. ‘Bits and pieces.’ He looked over his shoulder the way they had come. ‘Ways and means.’ ‘What if they find out?’ She pointed at the cottages. She rolled her eyes when he said nothing. They continued on the road past a sign forbidding exactly this last short walk, on tarmac so old it was becoming landscape. Perspective was peculiar. The smell should have been sappy and muddy and of the sea. ‘Look!’ His daughter gasped. The road stopped abruptly, rag-edged, fell into nothing. He watched her inch forward. ‘It goes right off the cliff!’ ‘The sea’s taking it all back,’ he said. ‘There used to be a lot more coast here. Careful.’ But she had lain responsibly on her stomach at a certain proximity and put only her fingertips and eyes over the tarmac rim to look down its sheer crumble at the beach. ‘Is it still going?’ she said. Her voice was faint, she was dipping her mouth below road-level. ‘Being eaten?’ Dughan shrugged. Waited till she scootched back and turned to him, shrugged again. He told her they would know within two or three hours if anything was going to happen. He did not say it was only hints and whispers he had to go on, trawlings from bulletin boards. Two names he knew, erstwhile colleagues, both announcing they’d be near Ipswich next week and did any of the old crew want a drink? The latest codes were beyond him, but that query and the night’s sudden burst of encrypted chatter had been reasons enough to move. So, he said, checked his watch and sat with her at the decomposing road-end. He was cross-legged, she with her chin on her knees, hugging them. She kept looking into the sea. The noise of it lulled them as if it were designed to. There was no light but the moon and those occasional sourceless mineral glows. Somewhere some insane bird, not a nightingale, was singing. All their layers could not keep them warm. They were shaking hard when, after less than an hour, Dughan saw movement on the beach. He motioned for his daughter to stay still and looked through his binoculars at lights jouncing on the shingle. Three sets of headlamps stopped, overlaying each other, illuminating the sea and a strip of the shore. ‘It’s them,’ he said. ‘They’re setting up. They must’ve…’ The girl could tell his excitement was not wholly enthusiasm. ‘They’ve… we’re on.’ He could make out nothing beyond the headlight gaze, and hear nothing but waves. He recced once more but they were not observed. This cliff-top was out of bounds and they, intruders, were alone. His daughter kept watching the water. Dughan wondered if she would complain or ask how long or anything, but she did not. Twenty minutes later, it was she who pointed, who first saw something in the sea. There were no helicopters now. Nothing so noisy. No downcast beams to light up what was coming, breaking water, way off the coast. It was only moonlit. A tower. A steeple of girders. Streaming, and rising. The girl stood. The metal was twisted. Off-true and angular like a skew-whiff crane, resisting collapse. It did not come steadily but lurched, hauling up and landward in huge jerks. After each a swaying hesitation; then another move higher, and closer. The lights on the beach went out. Flame ignited at the tower’s tip. Sooty sepia guttering lit the shaft. The sea at its base spread flat and fell away from suddenly rising intricate blockness, black, angled and extrusioned. As if a quarried wedge of the seabed itself had come up to look. The towerwork was on a platform. In the glow of the thing’s own flame they saw edificial flanks, the concrete and rust of them, the iron of the pylon barnacled, shaggy with benthic growth now lank gelatinous bunting. It was coming at the Covehithe cliff. Under its stains and excrescences were more regular markings, stencilled warnings. Paint remnants: an encircled H. Another step – because these were clumsy steps with which it came – and all the main mass was out of the water and raining brine. It waded. Each concrete cylinder leg a building or a smokestack wide. The two on one side came forward together, then those on the other. Pipes dangled from its roof-high underside, clots of it fell back into the sea. It wore steel containers, ruins of housing like a bad neighbourhood, old hoists, lift shafts emptying of black water. A few waves-width from the beach, it hesitated. It licked the air with a house-sized flame. ‘P-36,’ the man said. ‘Petrobras.’ One of the cars below turned its headlamps back on. The rig shied. Dughan hissed. But the lights quickly dipped and after a moment he said, ‘It’s probably ok now.’ The platform was at the level of their cliff-top. Now the girl understood its strange ungainliness. On each side, its supports merged at their base, into two horizontal struts, so it moved like a quadruped skiing. What must have been ten feet of water lapped at the struts like a puddle at a child’s shoes. The rig facelessly faced north and slide-stamped along the shoreline. ‘Quick,’ the man said. They took the cliff-edge path, a hedge to their right, the oil platform’s tower lurching beside them above its leaves. ‘Went down 2001,’ Dughan said. ‘Roncador field.’ ‘How many people died?’ ‘When it sank? No one.’ ‘Have you… is this the first…?’ He took a moment to stop, to turn and meet her eye. They could hear the flame bursts now. Its straining metal. ‘I’ve never seen it before, lovey’ he said. The path descended. She had been too small when her father left to imagine stories of his exploits, to be proud or afraid. All she remembered were his returnings, an exhausted, careful man who lifted her on to his lap and kissed her with wary love, brought her toys and foreign sweets. When later she had asked him what he had done on those trips, his answers were so vague guilt had hushed her. She did not ask about his injuries. The rig was slowing. The smell was stronger and the ground, the air juddered, not only in time to its huge steps. Dughan stopped at the last path-end trees. He and his daughter hugged the trunks and watched the oil rig sway in their direction. He held her hand. The girl watched him, too, but he showed no signs of angst, no flashback, no fear.
Continue reading …Half of 15-year-old girls have been drunk at least twice, nearly double the average proportion in other developed countries British girls are the biggest teenage binge drinkers in the western world, according to a report. Half of 15-year-olds have been drunk at least twice – almost double the 29% average of other developed countries, while 44% of 15-year-old British boys admitted to being intoxicated on two or more occasions. Girls also drink more alcohol in the UK than their male counterparts, with 44% of 15-year-old boys being intoxicated on two or more occasions. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) figures were published in a Through the Looking Glass , a report commissioned by the thinktank Demos. They found that between 1998 and 2008 the proportion of girls who binge-drank – defined as consuming more than six drinks per session – increased from 17% to 27%. As part of the report, which offers recommendations for a policy to empower young women, Demos conducted a poll of 500 British females aged 16 to 19. It found 84% were anxious about being able to secure the job they wanted in the future, with 81% also worried about doing well in exams. Money fears also featured highly, with more than three-quarters (76%) saying they were worried about not having enough money, compared with 38% who were anxious about finding a partner and 57% who were worried about getting into university. Having more cash to spend was ranked as the top answer (27%), when girls were asked what would make them happiest, while in second place was a good or better relationship with their boyfriend, girlfriend or partner (26%). The poll also found teenage girls thought success in education (92%), having good friends (72%) and being kind (70%) would enable them to excel in life. Among respondents 16% were not very happy, while 64% were quite happy most of the time and 17% felt very happy. Teenage girls from lower socioeconomic groups were less happy than their wealthier counterparts, with 13% reporting being very happy most of the time, against 19%, and 21% reporting to being not very happy most of the time against 15%. More than half (55%) said their mobile phone was the most important item in their bag, while 62% said their main use of the internet was for social networking. Children Alcohol Health Women guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Southbank Centre’s four-month jamboree includes a theatre inside a cow, world’s longest bunting and Susan the straw fox From the patio of her concrete den, Susan the giant straw fox is keeping a vigil over Waterloo Bridge. Her glare, enough to chill the dreams of the capital’s pet rabbits, is softened by the sounds of piped birdsong and the distant giggles of toddlers playing on the sandy beach by the Thames. Past the gaudy beach huts, on the other side of Hungerford Bridge, lie a helter skelter and an enormous, upturned purple cow. The only thing missing from the riverside as the Southbank prepares to mark the 60th anniversary of the Festival of Britain is a towering steel cigar, but the Skylon is long missing, presumed scrapped, buried or submerged. To pay homage to the event that helped usher London and the rest of Britain out of the postwar doldrums, the Southbank Centre is hosting a four-month jamboree boasting everything from gardens sprouting from the concrete buildings to a museum chronicling the original festival. From Friday until 4 September, the Royal Festival Hall, Hayward Gallery and Queen Elizabeth Hall will be enhanced by a Mobile Gull Appreciation Unit (essentially a kiosk shaped like a seagull), the world’s longest bunting and, of course, Susan the fox. While the pop-up beach and bunting hail from Southend-on-Sea, the enormous fox was built over 10 days in a Nottingham barn before being cut in half and taken down the M1 “on a wing and a prayer and two big lorries”, according to her creator, Alex Rinsler. The festival also includes a theatre in the body of Udderbelly the purple cow, a funfair and a part-built dry stone wall. Although organisers are loth to draw explicit comparisons between today’s Britain and Britain in 1951 – an austere, war-weary nation unsure of its place in the world – parallels are present. On the way up to a new garden on the roof of the Queen Elizabeth Hall, where daisies and sunflowers bloom and a band plays English Country Garden, visitors come to an al fresco gallery known as Helmand. Staring down from its walls are the dirty and dusty faces of British service personnel in Afghanistan. In one of the photographs, taken by the war artist Robert Wilson, a union flag-draped coffin waits to be loaded on to a transport plane at an airfield far from the Thames. According to Jude Kelly, artistic director of the Southbank Centre, the festivities are about more than history. “The British Isles is truly worth celebrating and you don’t have to be jingoistic to celebrate it,” she said. “This summer, we pay homage to this extraordinary event – and the thinking and vitality behind it – which paved the way for a better future for the country, following the aftermath of the second world war.” The aim, said Kelly, was to celebrate the landscape, seaside, character and imagination of the British people just as the original had. And the early signs on a hot late April morning a day before the opening certainly were encouraging. “The reaction of the public has been great and people will be able to see the site from angles that they haven’t seen before,” said Kelly. “You can already see people walking past the beach huts and plotting to bring their sandwiches and deckchairs. And why not?” Still, she mused, as workers put the finishing touches to exhibits, a little more time would have been nice. “We were going to open in two weeks but then William and Kate decided to get married and we felt it would be ungenerous not to open earlier.” On the roof of the Queen Elizabeth Hall, a pebble’s toss from the sandy beach that had already been annexed by a dozen or so under-fives, a team of ex-prisoners and former homeless people from the Eden Project toiled to plant and water the garden. Watching them was Shân Maclennan, the Southbank Centre’s creative director of learning and participation and mother of Florence, the girl who decided, for reasons most readily evident to the nine-year-old mind, that the vulpine effigy should be christened Susan. “I felt an enormous responsibility towards the original festival and didn’t want to do anything that people would feel was disrespectful,” said Maclennan. “I really, really want a lot of people to come and enjoy it. In 1951, even when it was night-time, people put their coats on and danced on the terraces and we want that to happen again.” • Southbank Centre celebrates the 60th anniversary of the Festival of Britain, 22 April to 4 September 1951 vs 2011 The Festival of Britain, which was billed as “a tonic to the nation”, was a countrywide event designed to boost morale and promote British industry, ingenuity and art in the wake of the second world war. As one of its architects, the Labour MP Herbert Morrison, put it, the festival was “the British showing themselves to themselves – and the world”. It also allowed the country an opportunity to take stock of how it and the world had changed since the glory days of the Great Exhibition of 1851, for which the sumptuous Crystal Palace had been constructed. Although there were events all over Britain between May and September 1951, the festival is best remembered for the events held in London, much of which was still in ruins after the Blitz. The Royal Festival Hall, which sits at the centre of the South Bank complex, was designed and built within three years to make sure it would be ready for the festival’s kick-off in May 1951. The star of the show, though, was the Skylon, a and futuristic skinny steel tower, 90 metres high, that appeared to float above the Southbank. Incredible feat of engineering as it was, its enduring fame has been as punchline. Much like the economy at the time, the joke ran, the Skylon had no visible means of support. The festival attracted more than 10m visitors, acted as an enormous trade show for the best of Britain, and lifted spirits. And that, said another of the brains behind the projectorganisers, the newspaper editor Gerald Barry, was the whole point of it. “Don’t run away with the idea that the Festival of Britain is going to be solemn,” he wrote in early 1951. “Not a bit of it. It will afford us all the opportunity, as occasion allows, for some harmless jollification. After more than a decade of voluntarily imposed austerity, we deserve it, and it will do us good.” Or, as the festival guidebook noted: “It will leave behind not just a record of what we have thought of ourselves in the year 1951 but, in a fair community founded where once there was a slum, in an avenue of trees or in some work of art, a reminder of what we have done to write this single, adventurous year into our national and local history.” London Festivals Sam Jones guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Good Friday broadcast will make him the first pontiff to take part in a televised question-and-answer session The Pope will take a small but significant step into the modern media age this afternoon when he becomes the first pontiff to take part in a televised question-and-answer session . It will not, however, be a Today programme-style grilling on controversial issues for the Catholic church such as child abuse. The pre-recorded Good Friday broadcast will show Benedict XVI answering a small number of pre-selected questions about Jesus and the Christian thinking behind world events. The 80-minute programme, In His Image – A Good Friday Special, on Italy’s publicly owned RAI channel, will begin at 2.10pm local time (1.10pm BST) so it can be on TV at 3pm, the moment that Jesus is traditionally thought to have died on the cross, the Catholic news agency CNA said. The RAI website for the programme has been soliciting questions for the pope and those selected have an apparently deliberate global and multifaith spread. According to CNA they will include one from a Muslim woman in Ivory Coast asking about Jesus’s role in teaching peace, and one from a group of seven Christian students from Baghdad. The agency quotes the website as saying viewers will also hear “questions from an Italian mother whose son was in a coma for many years and a young Japanese girl who wrote to ask the pope to explain the cause of the recent earthquake”. The idea for the broadcast came from its host, Rosario Carello, who said it was initially devised as a format in which viewers could ask questions about Jesus. The production team them came up with the idea of asking Benedict to answer them. While the idea seemed “crazy”, they gave it a try, CNA quoted Carello as saying: “We proposed it and the Pope accepted.” Pope Benedict XVI Catholicism Italy Vatican Christianity Easter Religion Television Peter Walker guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …