Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1667)

Miami Dolphins wide receiver Brandon Marshall underwent surgery after being stabbed in the abdomen by his wife, police say. Marshall’s agent tells the Miami Herald that the wound isn’t life-threatening and that he’s expected to fully recover. Police charged Michi Nogami-Marshall with aggravated battery with a deadly weapon in a…

Continue reading …
Blue Labour can defeat the coalition

The Labour thinker puts a restored faith in working-class values at the heart of a project for the party’s renewal The Labour tradition is far richer than its recent form of economic utilitarianism and political liberalism would suggest. Labour is a unique and paradoxical tradition that strengthens liberty and democracy, that combines faith and citizenship, patriotism and internationalism and is, at its best, radical and conservative. That is the paradox that Blue Labour is trying to capture in order to renew the party and the movement as a powerful force for good. In order to do that Labour needs to recall its vocation as the democratic driver of the politics of the common good, a Labour politics that brings together immigrants and locals, Catholics and Protestants, Muslims and atheists, middle and working classes. The resources for Labour’s renewal lie within the practices and history of the Labour movement. Blue Labour reminds the party that only democratic association can resist the power of capital and that the distinctive practices of the Labour movement are built upon reciprocity, mutuality and solidarity. This is not a politics of nostalgia, as has been claimed over the past few weeks by some critics inside and outside Labour. It is a claim that practices and values crucial to what Labour is and stands for have either been forgotten, lost or wrongly downgraded in the party’s list of priorities. Nor is it a defence of a vanished working class; it is a claim that the ethical vision of a humane society which led working men and women to found the party in 1900 is still relevant and vital today. It’s good that the media is increasingly talking about Blue Labour, but “blue” should not be understood to denote insularity, fear of change and a rearguard action in defence of the white working class. By re-engaging with its history, Labour can revitalise Britain. The Labour tradition understands something important about capitalism, which is that finance capital wishes to pursue the maximum returns on its investment. To that end it exerts great pressure to turn human beings and nature into commodities. Labour politics is rooted in the democratic resistance to the commodification of human beings. The organised workers who resisted their dispossession and exploitation called their party Labour to remind us of that. Democratic politics, according to this view, is the way citizens come together to protect the people and places that they love from danger. Britain’s forests, for instance, are more than an opportunity for the timber industry, as recent protests against privatisation amply demonstrated. This always generates a rich and complex politics that is as much about cherishing what you know and love as about the pursuit of progressive ends. That is why Labour politics has always been radical and conservative, wishing to democratise ancient institutions such as parliament and the city councils. Democratic resistance to the domination of capital through the pursuit of the common good is not really the way that liberals view politics or, more important, markets. They see the benefits but not the distress, the efficiencies but not the disruption, the choice but not the coercion. Labour has always understood both. This understanding is essential in defeating the liberal-led coalition – there is nothing conservative about this government – by developing a strong agenda for both regulating finance and generating regional private sector growth. At London Citizens I worked on the Living Wage Campaign so that contracted-out cleaners, cooks and security guards could earn enough to feed their children without having to do two jobs. I learned many things in those years and one of them was that, unless there were effective organisations, immigration led to a double exploitation, of the immigrants and of the locals. We ran a campaign called Strangers into Citizens so that illegal immigrants could build alliances and a common life with their new neighbours and colleagues. We ran the Living Wage Campaign to assert a common human status for all who worked in an enterprise or institution. It was driven primarily by faith communities who asserted the dignity of labour and the importance of association. It was a resistance to the commodification of labour. The Catholics, Methodists, Pentecostals and Muslims I worked with did not talk to me about changing divorce laws or prohibiting civil partnerships, about abortion or the hijab. We spoke about a living wage, about establishing an interest rate ceiling of 20%, about affordable family housing and community land trusts and about achieving a common status as a citizen of the country. We spoke about matters of common concern where we had common interests. A common life between the old and the new required the establishment of relationships between what was divided. It required new work agreements so that all was not relentlessly up for grabs in an exclusively contractual churn. The very simple idea of people’s relationships with others is what is at stake here. The centrality of one-to-one conversations, of relationship building, of establishing trust between what were seen as incompatible communities and interests transformed my understanding of what a politics of the common good could be, and of what Labour should be about. A political party that is a democratically organised force for the common good. In order to do this, Labour must establish those conversations that broker a common good within which party organisations such as Progress, the Fabians, Compass and the Christian Socialist Movement and Blue Labour talk and build a common programme. Blue Labour has no nostalgia for old Labour and no illusions about the shortcomings of the new. Both Blair and Brown were recklessly naïve about finance capital and the City of London and relentlessly managerial in their methods. Blair developed a political alchemy that Brown failed to recreate, and it was between tradition and modernity. The problem was that his conception of tradition was superficial and his concept of modernisation verging on the demented: a conception of globalisation understood entirely on the terms set by finance capital. The German economy with its worker representation on the management board, works councils, pension co-determination, regional banks and vocational regulation, in other words with high levels of democratic interference in the economy, emerged with a more efficient workforce, greater growth and with a genuinely modern industrial sector. The paradox here is that vocational institutions decried as “pre-modern” and “Jurassic” preserved a knowledge culture that facilitated a more efficient response to globalisation than managerialism. The democratic representation of different economic interests turned out to be more efficient than leaving decision-making to the money managers. So Labour needs to engage with diverse interests in corporate governance and place greater stress on vocational rather than transferrable skills. The control of the City of London in regional investment must be broken and local banks established that could enable people to have meaningful jobs and live closer to their parents. Modern economies require trust, institutions that uphold non-pecuniary values and strong constraints on capital. Again, this is not nostalgia but it does defy a view of modernisation defined by the unimpeded flow of money and people. The withdrawal by New Labour from the economy led to a manic embrace of the state. New Labour’s public sector reforms were almost Maoist in their conception of year zero managerial restructuring. As an academic at London Metropolitan University I lost count of the number of line managers that were assigned to supervise and assess me, but I do know that departmental meetings were abolished and academics had no decision-making power. “Human resources” and “teaching and learning” laid down the law and there was no departmental mediation. This was typical of New Labour public sector reforms. Managerial, arrogant and ultimately doomed. Labour should know that, unless the workforce is engaged and committed, change remains, in the worst sense of the word, aspirational. Old Labour was worse. Entirely disengaged from democracy in the economy, its renewal in our cities or in the party and held in thrall by an administrative and rational conception of the state and the use of scientific method to achieve its ends, by the 1970s it could barely generate the energy to win an election, let alone redistribute power to ordinary people. So there is plenty to talk about. The starting point for Blue Labour is that the banking crisis of 2008 marked the end of New Labour economics and opens up the possibility for renewal. The tradition is strong and the party should honour it. In its explanation of the crash it must point to the volatility and vice of finance capital and the necessity of a balance of power within the firm and stronger institutions to constrain capital and domesticate its destructive energy. The lessons of New Labour are not to have a contemptuous attitude to the lived experiences of people but work within them to craft a common story of what went wrong and how things can be better. To bring together previously separated political matter in the pursuit of the common good. In his Fabian speech in January, Ed Miliband set out the direction of travel. He stated his opposition to the domination of capital and an exclusive reliance on the state for redress. He expressed a desire to “change the common sense of the age” through renewing democracy in politics and the economy and opening the space for people to build a better life together. The price of victory is a constructive alternative and it will be crafted by all elements of the tradition. There are great times ahead for the Labour party. Labour Ed Miliband Trade unions Globalisation Maurice Glasman guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
How I kicked my digital habit

Twitter, Facebook, emails, and voicemail – we are overwhelmed by digital data, is it time to rebel against information overload? We were brushing through wet grass in the early morning when we saw it – a flash of white drifting behind a small patch of trees, backlit by the sun. Crouching down next to my small son, we watched the unmistakable shape of a barn owl until he disappeared into the wood. The look on my son’s face was part of a brief moment of magic, the kind of memory that we live for. Ordinarily, my next thought would have been to pull out my phone and take a photo, send a tweet or record a video. Connecting is something I do unconsciously now. Tweeting is like breathing and photos and video have documented nearly every day of my 21-month-old son’s life. The meaningful merged with the mundane, all dutifully and habitually recorded – my enjoyment split between that technological impulse and the more delicate human need to be in the moment. This is how we live. That weekend, however, our whole family – my partner, my son and I – were offline. Swallowtail Hill Farm, in Rye, East Sussex, is a pretty soft option when it comes to a digital detox; a charming small farm with a diverting collection of animals and four vintage tractors. Camping was an easy option for an offline experiment, but there wasn’t much choice outside that for a UK break. High-end hotels in the US are now promoting their offline credentials, from boutique luxury to remote donkey trekking, but the UK has some catching up to do. Anyway, blessed with two days of good weather and some delicious local food, I barely even noticed I wasn’t online. What I did notice was my partner, Will. If my worst digital habit is incessant tweeting, his is allowing his phone to be the single most disruptive thing in our relationship. Country walks, dinner, bathing our son – no moment is safe from the seemingly irresistible ringing, vibrating, nagging phone that demands – and wins – his attention when he should be enjoying the moment with us. Any objections of mine are swiftly defended by explaining the importance of dealing with that email/text/voicemail now , though it never seems anything that couldn’t wait half an hour. I take equal responsibility for our connectopia – magnetically drawn, as I am, to any screen that can feed my addiction. We handed our phones in at the gate. The only interruption during lunch was from two woodpeckers and the entertainment during dinner by the fire was our own conversation. There was a moment when Will was distracted by a buzzing sensation and reached for his phone, before realising it was a bee. Without our phones, we had no idea what the time was. I reached for my phone when I wondered about local property prices and whether it is normal to see a barn owl during the day. And those moments when Artley, my son, was leaning out of the steam train window, having his bath outdoors under a woodburner-powered shower and being read his bedtime story in front of an open fire, I’ve had to try and commit to my own fallible memory. Breaking away from my connected life, I could feel how the compulsion, the divided attention, the multitasking has permeated my way of being. Early adopters, the heavy technology users who throw themselves at every new device and service, will admit to an uncontrollable impulse to check email, tweets or Facebook. Researchers have called this “variable interval reinforcement schedule”; we have in effect been trained into digital message addiction because the most exciting rewards are unpredictable. We’re no better than slot-machine addicts. The hustle we develop as we struggle to keep up with the pace of digital information has produced a restless, anxious way of engaging with the world. Desperate for efficiency, this seeps into our physical lives; I feel compelled to tidy while on the phone, to fold the washing while brushing my teeth. No single task has my undivided attention. A study by the University of California, San Francisco, last week concluded that constant multi-tasking gradually erodes short-term memory. And interruptions are a massive problem, taking anything up to 20 times the length of the interruption to recover. For those of us compelled to check email every few minutes, that revelation explains where the day goes. As consumer web technologies mature, so too does our desire to understand the impact they are having on our lives. Few books on digital dystopia are more resonant than Hamlet’s BlackBerry , an imaginative and thoughtful book that explores philosophical reaction to new technologies throughout time and the lessons we should have learnt from those. The author, former Washington Post journalist William Powers, is, like me, a true believer in the power and potential of digital technologies, but concludes that we need a little discipline to restore control over our unsettling, hyper-connected lives. “The more we connect, the more our thoughts lean outward,” he writes. “There’s a preoccupation with what’s going on ‘out there’ in the bustling otherworld, rather than ‘in here’ with yourself and those right around you. What was once exterior and faraway is now easily accessible and this carries a sense of obligation or duty.” That feeling that we should be reaching out, or be available to be reached out to, is tied to the self-affirmation the internet provides. “In less-connected times, human beings were forced to shape their own interior sense of identity and worth.” Powers offers practical solutions, including advocating the use of paper as a more efficient way of organising our thoughts. The theory of “embodied interaction” asserts that physical objects free our minds to think because our hands and fingers can do much of the work, unlike screens where our brains are constantly in demand. The eponymous technology he describes in his book is an intriguing Elizabethan version of a PDA, pocket-sized notebooks with pages coated in an erasable, plaster-like material. “Writing tables”, as they were known, were used for note-taking and checklists. While we can’t be sure Shakespeare used one, we’re shown that Hamlet was a keen user of the latest screen technology. “Yea, from the table of my memory,” Hamlet reflects, after meeting the ghost of his dead father. I’ll wipe away all trivial fond records All saws of books, all forms, all pressures past, That youth and observation copied there Hamlet wants to clear his life of all the superficial detritus so that he can focus exclusively on avenging the death of his father. The development of print culture was adding to the tumult of life in Elizabethan England, just as we are overwhelmed with the explosion of always-on digital information today. Exploring Seneca’s “spa of the mind” as a way of escaping the commotion of a busy city, Powers explains that the constant demands of being overwhelmingly connected need to be balanced out by reintroducing a little disconnectedness. That’s exactly what Powers did at home, banning the internet at weekends. It took six months for the family to adjust. “Because we were now away from our connectedness on a regular basis, we grasped its utility and value more fully … There was an atmospheric change in our minds, a shift to a slower, less restless, more relaxed way of thinking. We could just be in one place, doing one particular thing, and enjoy it.” At home, my concern about our digital addiction is most acute when I catch my son looking at me while I’m checking a screen. It’s reinforcing how much more important the screen is than him, as if I’m teaching him that obeying these machines is what he needs to do. Our fireside conversation that night, against a backdrop of a moonlit wood, was about Hamlet’s BlackBerry and what Powers calls the “vanishing family trick”, when a seemingly sociable family would gradually dissolve away to screens in different corners of the house. It’s a familiar story. “What’s lost in the process is so valuable, it can’t be quantified,” Powers despairs. “Isn’t this what we live for – time spent with other people, those moments that can’t be translated into ones and zeros and replicated on a screen? I sometimes felt as if love itself, or the acts of the heart and mind that constitute love, were being leached out of the house by our screens.” As we left the farm, the real work began, trying to resolve our new promise of balancing work and home life by introducing phone-free zones and offline days. Best of all, when the farmer handed back our phones, we didn’t have a missed call or message between us. Jemima, Will & Artley stayed at Swallowtail Hill Farm, 01275 395447; canopyandstars.co.uk Mobile phones Email Computing Telecoms Social media Digital media Social trends Jemima Kiss guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Boffins in search of the perfect gag

Can you learn to be funny? Can you study humour and unlock its scientific formula? Alex Horne swaps the comedy circuit for the lecture hall in search of the science of laughter. Plus, Greg Davies, Tim Minchin and Shazia Mirza tell us what really tickles them In the middle of last year’s football World Cup, 200 men and women from Asia, America, Australia and Europe sat in silence in the main hall of the City University of Hong Kong. I was in the middle of this disparate group, next to my reluctant assistant, Tim.

Continue reading …
Boffins in search of the perfect gag

Can you learn to be funny? Can you study humour and unlock its scientific formula? Alex Horne swaps the comedy circuit for the lecture hall in search of the science of laughter. Plus, Greg Davies, Tim Minchin and Shazia Mirza tell us what really tickles them In the middle of last year’s football World Cup, 200 men and women from Asia, America, Australia and Europe sat in silence in the main hall of the City University of Hong Kong. I was in the middle of this disparate group, next to my reluctant assistant, Tim.

Continue reading …
‘I feel things deeply. I get angry’

Polly Harvey opens up to Dorian Lynskey about 20 years in music and the emotions behind her latest dark masterpiece Polly Jean Harvey chooses her words carefully. Her lyrical perfectionism is the chief reason why her new album, Let England Shake, has been widely hailed as her masterpiece – quite an achievement for someone 20 years and eight albums into her career, at a stage when most songwriters are leaning on their back catalogue. But she is almost as exacting when it comes to interviews. She talks in eloquent, formal sentences, with nary an um or er, as if even one careless utterance might betray her. At 41, Harvey is revered for what she does not give away. We don’t tend to draw distinctions between artist and celebrity. Usually the life promotes the work, and interviewers comb the lyrics for gateways into autobiography, but Harvey likes to keep certain doors closed. Apart from her short, inevitably public relationship with Nick Cave (they fell in love while filming the video to their 1996 duet “Henry Lee”), her private life is terra incognita. Last time I met her, in a pub in Abbotsbury, Dorset for 2007′s White Chalk, it struck me that she answered questions the same way she poured our tea: elegantly, precisely, without spilling a drop. The only personal detail I can remember extracting is her unexpected love of Wife Swap. This time she is warmer – literally so, because the fire in Kensington’s Gore hotel is on full-blast despite the sunshine outside. “I can’t work out how to turn it off,” she says apologetically. She is dressed so chicly, all in black, nothing out of place, that I assume she’s doing a photo shoot later, but no, it is just how she likes to present herself. Even the room feels carefully chosen. Wood-panelled, lined with stern oil paintings and ranks of unread books, it’s so remote from the 21st century that even the mineral water bottles on the table between us seem anachronistic, and my Dictaphone looks like something that fell off a spaceship. It speaks to Harvey’s fondness for old things. When I mention that I often go on holiday in Dorset, where she was born and still lives, she excitedly rattles off some Harveyesque sightseeing recommendations: graveyards and ruins. Like White Chalk , Let England Shake has an ancient quality – in the words of one song, “the grey, damp filthiness of ages and battered books/ Fog rolling down behind the mountains/ And on the graveyards and dead sea captains.” It’s about national identity and conflict, initially inspired by Iraq and Afghanistan but roaming across centuries and continents, following the ribbons of blood that tie all wars together. She thought it a strange, dark record when she finished it, and the intensely positive reception has surprised her. “It’s been overwhelming,” she says. “People from all walks of life tell me how much it’s touched them. It’s a wonderful feeling, and not one I’m used to – the feeling that people were hungry for this kind of work.” A few weeks ago she played the Troxy in east London. Even as she paraphrased Eddie Cochran on “The Words That Maketh Murder” and sang “What if I take my problem to the United Nations?” – a goofy joke in Cochran’s Summertime Blues half a century ago and a bitter one now — an ocean away in New York the UN Security Council was debating what to do about the rebellion in Libya. “It strikes me every time we play that song,” she says. “Or indeed any of the songs on the record – how you can apply them to different situations. Certainly that night at the Troxy it had a different meaning because of what was happening at the time, and I’m sure it did for many people in the room as well.” Whatever Harvey thinks about the Libyan intervention, or about any specific political controversy, she keeps to herself but the richness and ambiguity of Let England Shake allows listeners to make their own connections. It’s about war, and the damage it does to countries and to human bodies, but it doesn’t yield anything as simplistic as a message. The album is a collage of so many different voices – sampled, quoted or alluded to – that Harvey’s own point of view is lost in the fog, and deliberately so. “I didn’t want to tell people what to think or feel,” she says. “I wanted to remain a narrator.” In October 2008, around the time she was starting the album, she heard Stephen Wyatt’s Memorials to the Missing , a Radio 4 afternoon play about Fabian Ware, founder of the Imperial War Graves Commission. “What touched me the most is that [Ware] heard the voices of the dead talking to him and he couldn’t rest. I’d always be following the news and there’d be so many firsthand accounts from soldiers and civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq. That’s what I wanted to be heard – people who had been eyewitnesses through all different periods in history.” Even though Harvey has never written about such issues before, she says she has always been politically engaged, and music was crucial to her education. Her parents, a quarryman and a stonemason, were friends with Rolling Stone Ian Stewart and their remote Dorset farmhouse (she has said that even a day trip into town would make her dizzy) was often home to visiting musicians. The songs they played were windows on the world beyond. “Certain Neil Young songs like ‘Southern Man’ or ‘Ohio’, I’d go looking for the meaning behind them. A lot of Dylan’s work, especially the early 60s. Beefheart’s ‘Dachau Blues’. I remember hearing that when I was very young and wondering, what’s he singing about? ‘Burning in the ovens in world war two.’ Pink Floyd, ‘Money’. I remember thinking about money a lot, and how this thing that meant so much was just a piece of paper.” She laughs, and her laugh is wonderfully giddy and uncontrolled – it leaps out of her. “There was so much going on.” In sixth form she had an activist phase. “I think I went on a few different marches. I was involved in different action groups at the school.” What were the causes? “I can’t recall,” she says, unconvincingly. I suspect she just doesn’t want to give away any information that might enable people to slap a label on her. Still, it’s a surprising image: Polly Harvey on a demo, holding a placard. “I literally left school and went straight into music via art college for a year, and I’ve been so involved in my job of writing songs that the more actively involved part became channelled into standing on the stage and saying things that way. It’s only now that it’s come full circle and I’m using my voice again in a way that’s tying everything together.” Like a more elegant Forrest Gump, she has a habit of wandering into pivotal moments in history. She flew in to visit some friends in Berlin the day the wall came down in 1989. On 9/11 (or “September 11, 2001″ as she puts it with typical formality) she was on tour in Washington DC. This also happened to be the day that she won the Mercury prize, for Stories From the City, Stories From the Sea , and had to phone in her acceptance speech. “I can remember looking out of the hotel window and seeing armoured vehicles driving up the street and the Pentagon on fire, so of course everything took on an entirely different perspective. It felt very strange to not even be in the place where the prize was being given and then to be on the telephone and to look out of my window and see that scene.” The Mercury-winning Stories is her most commercially successful album to date and also her least favourite: an exercise in pop songcraft that left her unmoved. At that point, she could have gone either way. Her first two albums ( Dry , Rid of Me ) were raw and visceral. Her next two ( To Bring You My Love , Is This Desire ?) were spooky and sensual. Stories was predominately about New York (where she lived for a while) and being in love. On the cover, she stood looking chic and purposeful amid the bright lights of a Manhattan street. Entering her 30s, she seemed to have sanded down her edges and become comfortable, which, for all the album’s charms, was a disappointment. But no. Her next album, 2004′s Uh Huh Her was a raggedy scrapbook of disparate ideas, less a coherent statement than an exercise in creative house-clearing, and with White Chalk she opened a whole new chapter. Perennially disgruntled by critics who took her songs for glorified diary entries, she embraced a more obviously literary approach, setting aside her guitar to pick out sparse, beautiful melodies on unfamiliar instruments such as the piano and autoharp. She sits down to write every single day instead of waiting for the muse to strike. Lyrics tend to start out as poetry, and some then evolve into songs. “You have to be more disciplined, and you ultimately end up with a much stronger piece of work.” Listening to her talk about Let England Shake , it sounds less like a record than a novel or an art exhibition. “She comes from an art school ethos,” says Paul McGuinness, who has been managing Harvey since she supported his other clients, U2, in 1993. “Had she not got a record deal she would have gone on to do fine art at St Martins. She did get a record deal, but in a way she’s been at art school ever since. She’s extremely independent. She makes a plan and then very methodically carries it out.” Harvey still likes to draw and paint, recently contributing illustrations to Francis Ford Coppola’s Zoetrope: All-Story magazine, and owns paintings by Christopher T Wood and Alasdair Wallace. All the photographs and videos accompanying the new album are the work of the war photographer Seamus Murphy. “I’m probably much more influenced by film-makers and painters than I am by other songwriters or poets,” she says. “With songs I almost see the images, see the action, and then all I have to do is describe it. It’s almost like watching a scene from a film, and that’s what I go about trying to catch in a song.” Songwriters tend to be notoriously bad at describing the creative process, and loth to mention the perspiration behind the inspiration, but Harvey is visibly energised by talking about it. “I certainly feel like I’m getting somewhere that I wanted to get to as a writer of words. I wanted to get better, I wanted to be more coherent, I wanted there to be a greater strength and depth emotionally, and all these things require work – to hone something, to get rid of any superfluous language. I’m inspired by the other great writers I go back to and read again and again, and think how did they do that?” Such as? She indicates a volume of Harold Pinter’s poetry that she has brought with her. “Pinter leaves me speechless. Just unbelievable. A poem like ‘American Football’ or ‘The Disappeared’. TS Eliot of course. Ted Hughes. WB Yeats. James Joyce.” She leans forward, freshly excited. “Just that feeling of reading something profound and having your breath quite literally taken away by the end of a piece. I’m reading John Burnside’s poems at the moment. Do you know his work? I’m getting that feeling – just reaching the end of every poem, going ‘Oh my God!’” She clutches her chest and laughs. “And all of these writers offer me a greater understanding of what it is to be alive, and that is such an incredible thing art can do for other people. It made me want to try and get close to this strange, mysterious thing that people can do with words.” Even so, I wonder if she ever misses the jolting release of strapping on an electric guitar, turning it up loud, and bashing out a song in a couple of hours. “I think probably that desire is met in other areas – that immediate buzz you get from something taking off. It might be driving really fast somewhere. It might be screaming like a lunatic, running fast down a hill. Or playing music extremely loud and shouting.” This is the thing about Harvey. She has done such a good job recently of presenting herself as a patient craftswoman, chipping away at words the way her mother chips away at stone, that you could be mistaken for thinking she had become emotionally cool, but it’s just that she doesn’t advertise that side of her personality anymore, and for good reason. When, in 1992, she was promoting Dry , whose torrid, abstract expressions of female sexuality were new to indie-rock, she found herself fielding questions about when she lost her virginity. Along with the other sudden pressures of entering the music business, it precipitated a nervous breakdown. Circa To Bring You My Love three years later, when she adopted a lurid, glam-grotesque look she described as “Joan Crawford on acid,” she was asked about eating disorders. Who could blame her for pulling up the drawbridge in later years? She is not cool so much as contained, with a hint of underground streams foaming away beneath the surface. “I’m not a removed person, no matter what I’m doing,” she says. “I’ve always been very visceral in that I feel things very deeply. I certainly can get very angry about things I hear day to day, and shout at the radio, shout at the television, or actually feel sick or feel like weeping. Equally I laugh out loud quite a lot and I love comedy. I like to roll around laughing with tears streaming down my face. I do react to things.” I wonder how she was affected by researching Let England Shake . She hoovered up information about myriad conflicts from books and museums. When I last met her, she didn’t even own a computer but she has relented for research purposes. Unsurprisingly, she has not been seduced by such fripperies as Twitter. “I’m the type of person that if there’s something I have access to I want to know everything it has to offer. I can’t not finish a book. So if there’s an open book like the internet, there’s a temptation to sit there and learn everything. So I’m very disciplined. I just use it for very specific purposes when I know exactly what I’m looking for.” She knows so much about Gallipoli, the subject of at least three songs, that she could probably write a doctoral dissertation on the fiasco. She planned to go there, and to other first world war battlefields, but never got around to it. “I went within my mind but I’d still like to go there and see if the place I went in my mind is how it is.” Sometimes, she admits, it was overwhelming, all that death. “I think as a creative artist it’s crucial to be open – to feel. You can’t do it with a closed heart. You almost have to hand over your soul to that action. And so there can be times when you can feel too full of the piece that you’re making. It’s almost like being a sponge and you just have to absorb everything in order to have all of the goods to make something out of that. “I’ve been writing songs for many years, and you become more accustomed to taking care of that – knowing how much to expose yourself, knowing how to pace yourself. Just simple things like learning that when I come to approach my work every day there’s a certain opening that has to take place, and then when I finish my work for the day I give myself time to close that down again. You just close up all your edges and carry on about your day.” Having lived in New York or Los Angeles, she’s thinking of leaving Dorset again for a while. “It would be a good time for me to remove myself from familiar surroundings. It really opens my eyes and forces me to think in an entirely different way.” She already has several competing ideas for her next album, but you probably shouldn’t hold your breath waiting for it. Let England Shake was the product of “hundreds of pieces of writing: entirely finished poems and songs, entirely recorded songs”. Getting a record right has become more important to her than being prolific. “If it takes 10 years then I would rather wait and know that I felt each piece was strong than feel that it was time to put something out but five pieces are a bit weak.” The industry standard cycle of album-tour-album-tour doesn’t apply. “There wouldn’t be any point in me trying to persuade her to take the steps that I thought were necessary to get her into football stadiums,” says Paul McGuinness. “She’s not, quite honestly, that interested in success. She’s not driven in any way by commercial imperatives. Really she’s working to satisfy herself.” However charming and polite Harvey is, you can still come away from talking to her feeling that so much goes unsaid. She maintains her sense of mystery, which serves her art but leaves anyone who loves that art wanting to know more about the person who creates it. While writing Let England Shake , she dug out the war memorabilia of her own family: her great grandad’s naval hatband, her grandfather’s drum from the Home Guard, dozens of old photographs. “I did find myself looking at them and wishing I’d asked a lot more of my grandparents when they were still alive,” she says wistfully. “There’s so much you want to know once they’re gone.” I know the feeling. PJ Harvey’s Let England Shake and her latest single The Glorious Land are out now on Island PJ Harvey Dorian Lynskey guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
‘I feel things deeply. I get angry’

Polly Harvey opens up to Dorian Lynskey about 20 years in music and the emotions behind her latest dark masterpiece Polly Jean Harvey chooses her words carefully. Her lyrical perfectionism is the chief reason why her new album, Let England Shake, has been widely hailed as her masterpiece – quite an achievement for someone 20 years and eight albums into her career, at a stage when most songwriters are leaning on their back catalogue. But she is almost as exacting when it comes to interviews. She talks in eloquent, formal sentences, with nary an um or er, as if even one careless utterance might betray her. At 41, Harvey is revered for what she does not give away. We don’t tend to draw distinctions between artist and celebrity. Usually the life promotes the work, and interviewers comb the lyrics for gateways into autobiography, but Harvey likes to keep certain doors closed. Apart from her short, inevitably public relationship with Nick Cave (they fell in love while filming the video to their 1996 duet “Henry Lee”), her private life is terra incognita. Last time I met her, in a pub in Abbotsbury, Dorset for 2007′s White Chalk, it struck me that she answered questions the same way she poured our tea: elegantly, precisely, without spilling a drop. The only personal detail I can remember extracting is her unexpected love of Wife Swap. This time she is warmer – literally so, because the fire in Kensington’s Gore hotel is on full-blast despite the sunshine outside. “I can’t work out how to turn it off,” she says apologetically. She is dressed so chicly, all in black, nothing out of place, that I assume she’s doing a photo shoot later, but no, it is just how she likes to present herself. Even the room feels carefully chosen. Wood-panelled, lined with stern oil paintings and ranks of unread books, it’s so remote from the 21st century that even the mineral water bottles on the table between us seem anachronistic, and my Dictaphone looks like something that fell off a spaceship. It speaks to Harvey’s fondness for old things. When I mention that I often go on holiday in Dorset, where she was born and still lives, she excitedly rattles off some Harveyesque sightseeing recommendations: graveyards and ruins. Like White Chalk , Let England Shake has an ancient quality – in the words of one song, “the grey, damp filthiness of ages and battered books/ Fog rolling down behind the mountains/ And on the graveyards and dead sea captains.” It’s about national identity and conflict, initially inspired by Iraq and Afghanistan but roaming across centuries and continents, following the ribbons of blood that tie all wars together. She thought it a strange, dark record when she finished it, and the intensely positive reception has surprised her. “It’s been overwhelming,” she says. “People from all walks of life tell me how much it’s touched them. It’s a wonderful feeling, and not one I’m used to – the feeling that people were hungry for this kind of work.” A few weeks ago she played the Troxy in east London. Even as she paraphrased Eddie Cochran on “The Words That Maketh Murder” and sang “What if I take my problem to the United Nations?” – a goofy joke in Cochran’s Summertime Blues half a century ago and a bitter one now — an ocean away in New York the UN Security Council was debating what to do about the rebellion in Libya. “It strikes me every time we play that song,” she says. “Or indeed any of the songs on the record – how you can apply them to different situations. Certainly that night at the Troxy it had a different meaning because of what was happening at the time, and I’m sure it did for many people in the room as well.” Whatever Harvey thinks about the Libyan intervention, or about any specific political controversy, she keeps to herself but the richness and ambiguity of Let England Shake allows listeners to make their own connections. It’s about war, and the damage it does to countries and to human bodies, but it doesn’t yield anything as simplistic as a message. The album is a collage of so many different voices – sampled, quoted or alluded to – that Harvey’s own point of view is lost in the fog, and deliberately so. “I didn’t want to tell people what to think or feel,” she says. “I wanted to remain a narrator.” In October 2008, around the time she was starting the album, she heard Stephen Wyatt’s Memorials to the Missing , a Radio 4 afternoon play about Fabian Ware, founder of the Imperial War Graves Commission. “What touched me the most is that [Ware] heard the voices of the dead talking to him and he couldn’t rest. I’d always be following the news and there’d be so many firsthand accounts from soldiers and civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq. That’s what I wanted to be heard – people who had been eyewitnesses through all different periods in history.” Even though Harvey has never written about such issues before, she says she has always been politically engaged, and music was crucial to her education. Her parents, a quarryman and a stonemason, were friends with Rolling Stone Ian Stewart and their remote Dorset farmhouse (she has said that even a day trip into town would make her dizzy) was often home to visiting musicians. The songs they played were windows on the world beyond. “Certain Neil Young songs like ‘Southern Man’ or ‘Ohio’, I’d go looking for the meaning behind them. A lot of Dylan’s work, especially the early 60s. Beefheart’s ‘Dachau Blues’. I remember hearing that when I was very young and wondering, what’s he singing about? ‘Burning in the ovens in world war two.’ Pink Floyd, ‘Money’. I remember thinking about money a lot, and how this thing that meant so much was just a piece of paper.” She laughs, and her laugh is wonderfully giddy and uncontrolled – it leaps out of her. “There was so much going on.” In sixth form she had an activist phase. “I think I went on a few different marches. I was involved in different action groups at the school.” What were the causes? “I can’t recall,” she says, unconvincingly. I suspect she just doesn’t want to give away any information that might enable people to slap a label on her. Still, it’s a surprising image: Polly Harvey on a demo, holding a placard. “I literally left school and went straight into music via art college for a year, and I’ve been so involved in my job of writing songs that the more actively involved part became channelled into standing on the stage and saying things that way. It’s only now that it’s come full circle and I’m using my voice again in a way that’s tying everything together.” Like a more elegant Forrest Gump, she has a habit of wandering into pivotal moments in history. She flew in to visit some friends in Berlin the day the wall came down in 1989. On 9/11 (or “September 11, 2001″ as she puts it with typical formality) she was on tour in Washington DC. This also happened to be the day that she won the Mercury prize, for Stories From the City, Stories From the Sea , and had to phone in her acceptance speech. “I can remember looking out of the hotel window and seeing armoured vehicles driving up the street and the Pentagon on fire, so of course everything took on an entirely different perspective. It felt very strange to not even be in the place where the prize was being given and then to be on the telephone and to look out of my window and see that scene.” The Mercury-winning Stories is her most commercially successful album to date and also her least favourite: an exercise in pop songcraft that left her unmoved. At that point, she could have gone either way. Her first two albums ( Dry , Rid of Me ) were raw and visceral. Her next two ( To Bring You My Love , Is This Desire ?) were spooky and sensual. Stories was predominately about New York (where she lived for a while) and being in love. On the cover, she stood looking chic and purposeful amid the bright lights of a Manhattan street. Entering her 30s, she seemed to have sanded down her edges and become comfortable, which, for all the album’s charms, was a disappointment. But no. Her next album, 2004′s Uh Huh Her was a raggedy scrapbook of disparate ideas, less a coherent statement than an exercise in creative house-clearing, and with White Chalk she opened a whole new chapter. Perennially disgruntled by critics who took her songs for glorified diary entries, she embraced a more obviously literary approach, setting aside her guitar to pick out sparse, beautiful melodies on unfamiliar instruments such as the piano and autoharp. She sits down to write every single day instead of waiting for the muse to strike. Lyrics tend to start out as poetry, and some then evolve into songs. “You have to be more disciplined, and you ultimately end up with a much stronger piece of work.” Listening to her talk about Let England Shake , it sounds less like a record than a novel or an art exhibition. “She comes from an art school ethos,” says Paul McGuinness, who has been managing Harvey since she supported his other clients, U2, in 1993. “Had she not got a record deal she would have gone on to do fine art at St Martins. She did get a record deal, but in a way she’s been at art school ever since. She’s extremely independent. She makes a plan and then very methodically carries it out.” Harvey still likes to draw and paint, recently contributing illustrations to Francis Ford Coppola’s Zoetrope: All-Story magazine, and owns paintings by Christopher T Wood and Alasdair Wallace. All the photographs and videos accompanying the new album are the work of the war photographer Seamus Murphy. “I’m probably much more influenced by film-makers and painters than I am by other songwriters or poets,” she says. “With songs I almost see the images, see the action, and then all I have to do is describe it. It’s almost like watching a scene from a film, and that’s what I go about trying to catch in a song.” Songwriters tend to be notoriously bad at describing the creative process, and loth to mention the perspiration behind the inspiration, but Harvey is visibly energised by talking about it. “I certainly feel like I’m getting somewhere that I wanted to get to as a writer of words. I wanted to get better, I wanted to be more coherent, I wanted there to be a greater strength and depth emotionally, and all these things require work – to hone something, to get rid of any superfluous language. I’m inspired by the other great writers I go back to and read again and again, and think how did they do that?” Such as? She indicates a volume of Harold Pinter’s poetry that she has brought with her. “Pinter leaves me speechless. Just unbelievable. A poem like ‘American Football’ or ‘The Disappeared’. TS Eliot of course. Ted Hughes. WB Yeats. James Joyce.” She leans forward, freshly excited. “Just that feeling of reading something profound and having your breath quite literally taken away by the end of a piece. I’m reading John Burnside’s poems at the moment. Do you know his work? I’m getting that feeling – just reaching the end of every poem, going ‘Oh my God!’” She clutches her chest and laughs. “And all of these writers offer me a greater understanding of what it is to be alive, and that is such an incredible thing art can do for other people. It made me want to try and get close to this strange, mysterious thing that people can do with words.” Even so, I wonder if she ever misses the jolting release of strapping on an electric guitar, turning it up loud, and bashing out a song in a couple of hours. “I think probably that desire is met in other areas – that immediate buzz you get from something taking off. It might be driving really fast somewhere. It might be screaming like a lunatic, running fast down a hill. Or playing music extremely loud and shouting.” This is the thing about Harvey. She has done such a good job recently of presenting herself as a patient craftswoman, chipping away at words the way her mother chips away at stone, that you could be mistaken for thinking she had become emotionally cool, but it’s just that she doesn’t advertise that side of her personality anymore, and for good reason. When, in 1992, she was promoting Dry , whose torrid, abstract expressions of female sexuality were new to indie-rock, she found herself fielding questions about when she lost her virginity. Along with the other sudden pressures of entering the music business, it precipitated a nervous breakdown. Circa To Bring You My Love three years later, when she adopted a lurid, glam-grotesque look she described as “Joan Crawford on acid,” she was asked about eating disorders. Who could blame her for pulling up the drawbridge in later years? She is not cool so much as contained, with a hint of underground streams foaming away beneath the surface. “I’m not a removed person, no matter what I’m doing,” she says. “I’ve always been very visceral in that I feel things very deeply. I certainly can get very angry about things I hear day to day, and shout at the radio, shout at the television, or actually feel sick or feel like weeping. Equally I laugh out loud quite a lot and I love comedy. I like to roll around laughing with tears streaming down my face. I do react to things.” I wonder how she was affected by researching Let England Shake . She hoovered up information about myriad conflicts from books and museums. When I last met her, she didn’t even own a computer but she has relented for research purposes. Unsurprisingly, she has not been seduced by such fripperies as Twitter. “I’m the type of person that if there’s something I have access to I want to know everything it has to offer. I can’t not finish a book. So if there’s an open book like the internet, there’s a temptation to sit there and learn everything. So I’m very disciplined. I just use it for very specific purposes when I know exactly what I’m looking for.” She knows so much about Gallipoli, the subject of at least three songs, that she could probably write a doctoral dissertation on the fiasco. She planned to go there, and to other first world war battlefields, but never got around to it. “I went within my mind but I’d still like to go there and see if the place I went in my mind is how it is.” Sometimes, she admits, it was overwhelming, all that death. “I think as a creative artist it’s crucial to be open – to feel. You can’t do it with a closed heart. You almost have to hand over your soul to that action. And so there can be times when you can feel too full of the piece that you’re making. It’s almost like being a sponge and you just have to absorb everything in order to have all of the goods to make something out of that. “I’ve been writing songs for many years, and you become more accustomed to taking care of that – knowing how much to expose yourself, knowing how to pace yourself. Just simple things like learning that when I come to approach my work every day there’s a certain opening that has to take place, and then when I finish my work for the day I give myself time to close that down again. You just close up all your edges and carry on about your day.” Having lived in New York or Los Angeles, she’s thinking of leaving Dorset again for a while. “It would be a good time for me to remove myself from familiar surroundings. It really opens my eyes and forces me to think in an entirely different way.” She already has several competing ideas for her next album, but you probably shouldn’t hold your breath waiting for it. Let England Shake was the product of “hundreds of pieces of writing: entirely finished poems and songs, entirely recorded songs”. Getting a record right has become more important to her than being prolific. “If it takes 10 years then I would rather wait and know that I felt each piece was strong than feel that it was time to put something out but five pieces are a bit weak.” The industry standard cycle of album-tour-album-tour doesn’t apply. “There wouldn’t be any point in me trying to persuade her to take the steps that I thought were necessary to get her into football stadiums,” says Paul McGuinness. “She’s not, quite honestly, that interested in success. She’s not driven in any way by commercial imperatives. Really she’s working to satisfy herself.” However charming and polite Harvey is, you can still come away from talking to her feeling that so much goes unsaid. She maintains her sense of mystery, which serves her art but leaves anyone who loves that art wanting to know more about the person who creates it. While writing Let England Shake , she dug out the war memorabilia of her own family: her great grandad’s naval hatband, her grandfather’s drum from the Home Guard, dozens of old photographs. “I did find myself looking at them and wishing I’d asked a lot more of my grandparents when they were still alive,” she says wistfully. “There’s so much you want to know once they’re gone.” I know the feeling. PJ Harvey’s Let England Shake and her latest single The Glorious Land are out now on Island PJ Harvey Dorian Lynskey guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Amazon still hasn’t fully resolved the massive computer glitch that has brought down or slowed websites large and small, but one thing is clear: “This is a wake-up call for cloud computing,” an industry analyst tells the New York Times . “It will force a conversation in the industry.” With cloud…

Continue reading …

In his book Outliers , Malcolm Gladwell popularized the notion that it takes 10,000 hours of practice to become great at something. Portland’s Dan McLaughlin is testing the theory in a remarkable way: The 31-year-old quit his job in June 2009 and devoted himself to practicing golf six hours a…

Continue reading …

Divorce is financially prudent again. Lawyers and marriage experts say that the American divorce rate, which slackened during the recession, is rebounding as the economy improves, the Financial Times reports. Essentially, fewer people are staying together just to save the cost of a breakup. “There is huge pent-up demand,” says…

Continue reading …