Opposition forces claim Libyan leader’s offer is not genuine as they struggle to retain control of Misrata’s port Libyan opposition forces have rejected a ceasefire offer by Muammar Gaddafi and dismissed his regime’s claims that loyalist forces had cut off access to the crucial seaport in the besieged city of Misrata. In a rambling, defiant speech on state television on Saturday, in which he declared that he was “more sacred [to Libyans] than the emperor of Japan is to his people”, Gaddafi called for talks with Nato, which is conducting air strikes against his forces. “The door to peace is open,” Gaddafi said. “You are the aggressors. We will negotiate with you. Come, France, Italy, UK, America, come, we will negotiate with you. Why are you attacking us?” More than two months into the Libyan revolution, loyalist forces are becoming increasing stretched. In the east, they are preventing the rebel advance near the town of Ajdabiya; in the far west, they are trying to quell a more recent uprising near the border with Tunisia. And just 130 miles from Tripoli, the battle for the industrial city of Misrata continues, with at least six people killed before noon on Saturday. In an echo of comments by his son Saif, who said on Friday the regime would fight on for 40 years if necessary, Gaddafi said his own future would not up for discussion in any talks. “No one can force me to leave my country and no one can tell me not to fight for my country,” he said. Around the same time as he was speaking, Nato bombs stuck a government complex in Tripoli. A Nato official told Associated Press that the alliance needed “to see not words but actions” from Gaddafi. Indeed, the regime’s message seemed contradictory, with government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim saying on Saturday that Misrata would face “total fire” if its civilian army did not accept an amnesty offer within four days. The opposition Transitional National Council, in the eastern city of Benghazi, which is under rebel control, said the ceasefire offer was not genuine and vowed to fight on. “[Gaddafi's regime] has repeatedly offered ceasefires only to continue violating basic human rights, international humanitarian law, and the safety and security of Libya and the entire region,” said Abdelhafed Ghoga, the council’s vice-chairman. “The time for compromise has passed. The people of Libya cannot possibly envisage or accept a future Libya in which Gaddafi’s regime plays any role.” Having been forced out of the city centre in Misrata following weeks of heavy fighting against the rebels, loyalist forces equipped with tanks are now trying to defend their positions on the edge of the city. There were more heavy clashes near the airport, where some of the government forces are massed, as well as close to Zawiya Al-Mahjoub, a satellite town about eight miles west of Misrata. Gaddafi’s troops have also stepped up their attempts to take control of the port, which is the city’s lifeline, allowing in food and other humanitarian supplies as well as light weapons from Benghazi. Several days of shelling have affected the coming and going of ships, with boats carrying urgent supplies forced to stay a safe distance from the coast for long periods until the barrage stops. On Saturday morning, a ferry chartered by the International Organisation for Migration to pick up stranded migrants in Misrata was among the ships prevented from docking. On Friday, Nato warships caught Gaddafi’s forces trying to lay sea mines around the harbour. Libyan state television claimed – falsely – the port had been put “out of service” and said all humanitarian aid should be transferred “overland and under the supervision of the armed forces” – an impossible situation given that the city is under siege. The rebels are keenly aware of the importance of the port and have put up strong defences around it. In clashes close to the harbour on Saturday morning, five rebel fighters were killed when their position was shelled. Ahmed Abuhamik, 22, a rebel fighter who was stationed nearby, said Gaddafi’s forces did not have the power to take over the port as long as Nato planes were striking their positions. “Nato are trying, but we need them to hurry up. Too many civilians are dying,” he said. In his amnesty offer, Gaddafi claimed that rebels who gave up their guns would be offered cars and cash. “Does he think this revolution is about money?” said Abuhamik. “It is about freedom. Anyway, if we give up our weapons, he will kill everyone here, trust me.” Libya Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest Nato Xan Rice guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A man who allegedly impregnated and kidnapped a teen relative decades ago has been arrested after years on the run. The alleged victim says she was 13 when James David Gibson began sexually abusing her in Arizona in the late ’70s. She says he kidnapped her and forced her to…
Continue reading …• Email rob.smyth@guardian.co.uk with your thoughts • Check out all the latest scores here • And all the latest – live – league tables are here • Pre order Rob’s book if you so desire 3.06pm “Warning to readers,” says Michael Cosgrove. “Do NOT watch the Swans video. I’ve had that depressing dirge stuck in my head for the last hour. Am now making a noose.” Hang on, that D-word is unfair. You can call it dirge, sure, but no way is it depressing. 3.05pm: WEST BROM 0-1 ASTON VILLA (Meite own goal 4) A farcical own goal gives Villa the lead at the Hawthorns. Stewart Downing crossed from the right of the box and Abdoulaye Meite, in trying to clear, sliced it hopelessly into the far corner. Real slapstick nonsense, the sort that would have Denis Norden chortling like there’s no tomorrow. 2.59pm “Four of the bottom five have very winnable games this weekend,” says S Dickens. “If I were a West Ham fan I’d be thinking that our failure might well be all but confirmed this weekend. Being a Toon fan am thinking picking up Scott Parker, Carlton Cole and Matthew Upson on the cheap.” Why on earth would anyone want to buy Can’t Control? (Also, although those four games are winnable, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if none of them were actually won.) 2.52pm “You said that Wigan v. Everton has the most riding on it,” says Phil Walsh. “That’s obviously true for Wigan fans, but what about us Evertonians? Another season and all that happens by the end of it is Cahill, Arteta, and Jagielka get older while Rodwell and Coleman play well enough to attract the attention of bigger clubs. Everton can now not hope of qualifying for the Champions League. Hell, we can’t even get into the Europa League anymore. At least fans of clubs bad enough to seriously risk being relegated have something to look forward to. The inevitable ‘Survival Saturday/Sunday’ weekend coming up would interest me a lot of a lot more if I was even slightly emotionally invested in it.” Yep. It’s ridiculous really. David Moyes has to work exceptionally well every season merely to maintain a slightly tedious status quo. I have a lot of sympathy for him as he is clearly an outstanding manager. In many ways, Everton are the greatest example of what an indefensible disgrace the Premier League has become. Whatever happens in the football , this is the best thing you’ll see today. If Kojak had been a footballer he’d have been Obdulio Varela, and praise doesn’t come much higher round these parts. 2.46pm “Any idea why Clint Dempsey isn’t available today?” asks Levi Harris. “I seem to have made a fantasy football faux pas.” I think his wish has come true . “Which game to watch?” says Jonny Mac. “I have the choice of three live games, ‘…all in glorious HD’: Wigan v Everton, Sunderland v Fulham and West Brom v Villa. Which should I go for? Quite fancy the Midlands derby but is that the right choice. What to do?” Do you have a Kojak boxset? If so, I’d get that on. (But if you insist on watching some football, I would go for Wigan v Everton. It has the most riding on it.) Wigan v Everton team news Wigan Al Habsi, Boyce, Gary Caldwell, Alcaraz, Figueroa, Diame, Watson, N’Zogbia, McCarthy, Cleverley, Rodallega. Subs: Kirkland, Gohouri, Di Santo, Moses, Gomez, McArthur, Sammon. Everton Howard, Hibbert, Jagielka, Distin, Baines, Osman, Neville, Rodwell, Arteta, Cahill, Anichebe. Subs: Mucha, Bilyaletdinov, Beckford, Gueye, Coleman, Vellios, Duffy. Referee Lee Mason (Lancashire) West Brom v Aston Villa team news West Brom Carson, Jara, Meite, Olsson, Shorey, Vela, Scharner, Mulumbu, Morrison, Cox, Odemwingie. Subs: Myhill, Tchoyi, Pablo, Miller, Hurst, Fortune, Tamas. Aston Villa Friedel, Walker, Collins, Dunne, Luke Young, Ashley Young, Reo-Coker, Petrov, Downing, Agbonlahor, Bent. Subs: Marshall, Pires, Albrighton, Bradley, Delph, Clark, Cuellar. Referee Phil Dowd (Staffordshire) Sunderland v Fulham team news Sunderland Mignolet; Elmohamady, Turner, Onuoha, Bardsley; Henderson, Cattermole, Colback, Muntari, Malbranque, Sessegnon. Subs: Carson, Mensah, Zenden, Riveros, Ferdinand, Adams, Lynch. Fulham Schwarzer, Salcido, Senderos, Hughes, Baird, Kakuta, Murphy, Sidwell, Davies, Zamora, Gudjohnsen. Subs: Stockdale, Kelly, Johnson, Etuhu, Greening, Dembele, Hoesen. Referee Martin Atkinson (W Yorkshire) Blackburn v Bolton team news Blackburn Robinson; Salgado, Samba, Phil Jones, Givet, Emerton, Nzonzi, Jermaine Jones, Olsson, Roberts, Benjani. Subs: Bunn, Kalinic, Pedersen, Santa Cruz, Rochina, Hanley, Diouf. Bolton Bogdan, Cahill, Wheater, Knight, Robinson, Moreno, Cohen, Gardner, Taylor, Elmander, Kevin Davies. Subs: Jaaskelainen, Muamba, Petrov, Klasnic, Blake, Alonso, Lee. Referee Mike Dean (Wirral) Blackpool v Stoke team news Blackpool (4-3-3) Gilks; Eardley, Evatt, Baptiste, Crainey; Southern, Adam, Vaughan; Taylor-Fletcher, Campbell, Phillips. Subs: Kingson, Ormerod, Varney, Cathcart, Kornilenko, Puncheon, Reid. Stoke (4-4-2) Begovic; Wilkinson, Huth, Shawcross, Wilson; Pennant, Whitehead, Whelan, Delap; Walters, Jones. Subs: Sorensen, Collins, Pugh, Diao, Carew, Faye, Shotton. Referee Mark Clattenburg (Tyne & Wear) Thanks to Bogota Bandit , of the Red Issue Sanctuary, for pointing out this arfgasmic video. Random football video department This man was in his sixties when he did this. Good cause department My colleague Steph Fincham will be cycling across Sri Lanka next February to raise funds for the Mines Advisory Group. You don’t really need me to tell you how worthy a cause it is, and you can sponsor Steph here if you wish . As today’s theme is failure , there is only one appropriate soundtrack. Preamble Hello. Today’s clockwatch is all about failure, and the attempted avoidance thereof – if, indeed, failure is how relegation should be defined in a competition so inherently unfair that only a chosen few a realistic chance of success. But that’s how the Premier League is these days, and each of today’s five 3pm fixtures involve at least one side who could still go down this season. That, admittedly, is highly unlikely in the case of Sunderland v Fulham and West Brom v Aston Villa. All four sides have reached the magic 40-point mark, and only one side has been relegated since 1998 after reaching that total: West Ham in 2002-03. The other three fixtures, however, are of huge importance. Blackburn, Blackpool and Wigan, the teams who lie 16th, 17th and 18th, have tricky but winnable home games against sides who sit between seventh and 10th and have little to play for except pride, and we all know that’s overrated. We’ll also be keeping an eye of the Football League, particularly Vicarage Road (any excuse to talk about Watford, eh), where QPR’s promotion to the Premier League will be confirmed if they avoid defeat. These are the Premier League fixtures, with predictions on which you are strongly advised not to stake your mortgage, or your last Rolo: Blackburn 1-1 Bolton Blackpool 0-2 Stoke Sunderland 1-1 Fulham West Brom 2-0 Aston Villa Wigan 1-3 Everton And here’s the Premier League table , which will update throughout the afternoon as the goals go in and the speculative shots go for throw-ins. Premier League Rob Smyth guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …What steps should Oxbridge take to broaden their intake beyond the rich, white and privately educated? David Lammy MP and classics don Mary Beard have a heated exchange Tottenham MP David Lammy used Freedom of Information requests to show that one Oxford college admitted no black students in five years. Cambridge scholar
Continue reading …Helicopter carrying royal newlyweds leaves Buckingham Palace for an undisclosed destination after black-tie celebration Married life dawned for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, and a helicopter carrying the newlyweds left Buckingham Palace for an undisclosed destination. After spending Friday evening celebrating at the palace with close family and friends, William and Kate are expected to travel abroad for their honeymoon in the next two weeks. St James’s Palace said the newlyweds had decided not to depart for their honeymoon immediately and would spend the weekend privately at an undisclosed location in the UK. The prince will return to his job as a search and rescue helicopter pilot next week before the couple finally take their honeymoon. The destination has been shrouded in secrecy – the duke reportedly has not even told his bride where they are going – but speculation is rife over possible choices. The duke, who has taken a fortnight’s leave from his job as an RAF search and rescue pilot, is known to have a deep affection for Africa and would probably be on safe romantic territory if he chose to take his wife to Kenya, where he proposed to her last year. The couple, who have said they want the media to respect their privacy during their honeymoon, were photographed walking to a helipad and stopping to shake hands with members of staff. Friday night’s black-tie celebration, which started with dinner in the palace’s lavish ballroom, ended with dancing into the small hours while Prince Harry gave his best man’s speech. He is reported to have joked about the relative heights of his brother’s new bride and the Duke of Edinburgh, his grandfather, whom she was said to have towered over in three-inch heels. Some of the prominent guests returned to their rooms at the Goring hotel at about 3am as the party at the palace wound down. Prince Harry had announced plans to make an early morning fry-up for anyone with the constitution to stay awake through the night. Normal service was resuming around the UK as royalists and party-lovers nursed hangovers and republicans breathed sighs of relief. A family friend of the Middletons, Tony Ainsworth, said outside the Goring hotel: “It has been an historic occasion. After the concerns of getting to the church on time, it all went smoothly. We had a party at the hotel last night that went on well into the evening, so we’re feeling a little jaded this morning.” He said the bride’s parents, Carole and Michael Middleton, made an appearance at the hotel party. “I went to bed around 1am but I heard guests stumbling around at 5am, coming back from the palace, which woke me up.” Other tired but happy revellers included the bride’s friends who rushed back to Bucklebury, the Berkshire village where she grew up, to celebrate into the night. John Haley, owner of the Old Boot Inn in nearby Stanford Dingley, was one of several residents from the village to have attended the wedding and afterwards he threw an invitation-only party for 350 guests in his pub, which is thought to be the duchess’s favourite. He and his partner, Pam Brown, got back to Berkshire to find the party well under way with the beer garden and pub filled with local residents. He said it had been a wonderful day. “It was fabulous, it was out of this world. Words can’t describe it.” . Royal wedding Prince William Kate Middleton Monarchy Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …M11 collision between a coach and lorry forces closure in both directions around junction for Stansted airport Two people have been killed in a crash that closed the M11 in both directions in Essex and Cambridgeshire. Fifty people were on board a coach that was in collision with a lorry on the southbound carriageway in the early hours of the morning. The driver of the lorry and a passenger on the coach died and six people sustained serious injuries, the emergency services said. Others with minor injuries were treated at hospitals in Cambridge, Harlow and Chelmsford. Essex police said: “Three coach passengers have been admitted to hospital and are being treated for back injuries, the severity of which is being established. “Other passengers were taken to hospital as a precaution and have been released. A company coach has taken passengers to their homes or other destinations.” The motorway was closed in both directions between junction 8, the turnoff for Stansted airport, and junction 9 at Great Chesterford. A number of diversions were put in place and motorists were advised to make alternative plans, especially if heading to the airport. Police said it was hoped the northbound carriageway would be open by noon and the southbound one by 3pm. Road transport Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …M11 collision between a coach and lorry forces closure in both directions around junction for Stansted airport Two people have been killed in a crash that closed the M11 in both directions in Essex and Cambridgeshire. Fifty people were on board a coach that was in collision with a lorry on the southbound carriageway in the early hours of the morning. The driver of the lorry and a passenger on the coach died and six people sustained serious injuries, the emergency services said. Others with minor injuries were treated at hospitals in Cambridge, Harlow and Chelmsford. Essex police said: “Three coach passengers have been admitted to hospital and are being treated for back injuries, the severity of which is being established. “Other passengers were taken to hospital as a precaution and have been released. A company coach has taken passengers to their homes or other destinations.” The motorway was closed in both directions between junction 8, the turnoff for Stansted airport, and junction 9 at Great Chesterford. A number of diversions were put in place and motorists were advised to make alternative plans, especially if heading to the airport. Police said it was hoped the northbound carriageway would be open by noon and the southbound one by 3pm. Road transport Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …When her mother died, Kate Lloyd discovered that the person she knew was really someone else. She had walked out on her family after the war, changed her name and reinvented her past. But why? My mother painted a sensational portrait of her early life, saying she had been an orphan brought up by a cruel aunt after her mother was killed in a riding accident and her father died of a broken heart. This was high drama and seemingly played out in the context of landed gentry at least, if not the aristocracy. She said they were Irish Catholics, that she and her sisters had gone to a convent school. She certainly played the part, not that she went to church, but she had a rosary and used to go on about the nuns. She told me her father was moved to tears by music, that he took her to hear a Wagner opera when she was much too young, which was why she didn’t like it. At the time I never doubted what she said, even if it verged on melodrama. When I asked her why one of her toes was a bit squashed, she said: “My race horse stepped on me.” The horse had run away with her and ended up in the centre of Cambridge, and she fell off in one of the colleges. Now it all sounds so improbable. Maybe I should have asked why there were no family photographs, or even any relatives on her side of the family. But my father seems to have accepted her account of things and as I grew up there seemed no reason to question her stories. It wasn’t until much later that I started to realise how odd it sounded. I think one of the reasons she carried it off was that she was an incredibly beautiful woman, and a talented portrait painter. So there was no reason to doubt her claim that she had studied at Chelsea School of Art alongside Dirk Bogarde, when Henry Moore was teaching sculpture there. Friends used to refer to her as the duchess because she behaved like one. She told me that I would be presented at court as a debutante, just as she had been. Of course, I believed her. With hindsight, I can see there were inconsistencies, but you couldn’t query anything. She clammed up as soon as you started talking about her family and changed the subject. She died on New Year’s Day 2007, aged 89, but when my brother and I cleared out her flat there was no birth certificate, which made me curious. So I sent off for it. When I opened the envelope, my first thought was that it was the wrong one because the name was Margaret Ada, whereas my mother had been Margo Adela. But her father’s name – Richard John Beasely – and date of birth were both correct. Then the penny began to drop – this was her birth certificate. At some point she must have changed her name to make it sound more refined. But what shocked me even more was seeing that her father was a fishmonger, her mother a housekeeper and they weren’t even married. The rest of the story began to unfold when I went to the public record office. As Mother had often referred to the fact that she was a twin, the clerk said her sister must be on the same page of the register. That was a spooky moment. We found the twin listed, with the name Janet Kathleen. I’m Dinah Kathleen, so I’d been named after her without ever knowing it. I discovered eight other siblings born outside marriage, all, at some time, living in the family home in Kensington, west London. I also discovered cousins in Minneapolis and Australia and, most astonishing of all, my mother’s younger sister Lily, still alive at the age of 91 and living near me. That was another moment, meeting my aunt for the first time. She didn’t hide the fact that she disliked my mother, saying: “Margaret considered herself better than the rest of us.” Disappointingly, Lily was unable to shed any light on what the family thought had happened to Margaret, or how they lost contact. Did she just disappear overnight? Her version has a lack of clarity, simply because of her age, though it’s clear she was glad to see the back of Mother and I can’t imagine she would have tried very hard to get back in touch. There’s a vague suggestion that people thought Margaret had emigrated to America, which probably suited her. But it was something Lily said about her own life that struck a chord with me. She claims to have fallen out with her own daughter 20 years ago, and they haven’t spoken since. That combative, argumentative nature, and the tendency to bear grudges is a recurring family trait, which I recognise because my mother was also prone to it. Maybe it helps to explain the rift. Lily went into service and later may have worked for a photographer. Some of the details of her life are hazy because she’s become a little forgetful. But what emerges from all the marriage and birth certificates I’ve collected is that all the brothers and sisters except Margo went into manual trades and became plumbers and electricians, and so on, whereas Margo managed to gain access to a much higher social echelon and more financial security than she was destined for at birth. Nowadays, Lily lives in a very modest flat whereas, even after 20 years as a widow, Margo lived in some style. She was always perfectly turned out, with the best clothes, shoes and handbags, and looked immaculate. People outside the family regarded her as charming and elegant. My impression is that Lily’s life was less happy. Though I still have a lot of questions about my mother’s life, it’s clear that from an early age she had the ambition to shed the family and its low social status. It’s sort of sad, even chilling, but at the same time you can admire the cleverness with which she did it. It also explains some of her incredibly fierce opinions. She thought having children outside marriage was terrible. She was absolutely scathing to a friend whose child had children without being married. When I was small, our behaviour had to be perfect. Anybody who said, “Pleased to meet you” rather than, “How do you do?” was beyond the pale and absolutely common. Of course, it came as a tremendous shock when Aunt Lily told me that my grandfather was a boozer and womaniser, but maybe it helps to explain Mother’s distaste for her origins. My father was a comfortably-off doctor in Malvern, so marrying him must have provided the social cachet she yearned for. All the more so because the family was quite gentrified, being directly descended from the founder of Lloyds bank. My paternal grandmother was quite a grande dame and highly intellectual, which made her frightening to me, but I can imagine my mother saw her as a role model. Mother was ill with cancer for her last six years, during which we got closer and closer. Once we were reminiscing about my childhood. I said my first memory was her ticking me off when I was about three. I’d been sitting outside the house with bunches of grape hyacinths I’d picked in the garden, trying to sell them to passersby. And she came and sort of snatched me up and said, “Good gracious, you look like a Gypsy!” We were giggling about that, so I asked, “What do you remember of your mother?” And she snapped, “Nothing!” I just left it, and let it hang, and after quite a long silence she said: “Perhaps I don’t want to remember.” Sometimes I wonder if she actually believed the stories that she’d made up because she told them so often that they were real to her. After she died, I discovered she’d been trying to trace her twin sister online. There’s a terrible pathos about that. Realising she was near the end, maybe she regretted cutting herself off from the family and wanted to see her twin again before she died. In fact, Janet had passed away in 1998. I think perhaps Mother succeeded because of the war and the social disruption it caused. And because she was talented and very beautiful. Part of me thinks she was damned clever to live a lie from 1939 and carry it off. You have to have a bit of admiration for that. She would be very cross with me for digging up her past, but I feel cross with her for keeping it secret. Particularly when we were so close at the end. It’s my heritage as well as hers. To discover cousins that might have been lifelong friends if I’d known them earlier felt strange. I suppose part of me was sad that she didn’t talk about it at the end when I gave her the opportunity. And to think that my grandfather was alive during my lifetime – that I could have met him but was never given the chance. Family Parents and parenting guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …When her mother died, Kate Lloyd discovered that the person she knew was really someone else. She had walked out on her family after the war, changed her name and reinvented her past. But why? My mother painted a sensational portrait of her early life, saying she had been an orphan brought up by a cruel aunt after her mother was killed in a riding accident and her father died of a broken heart. This was high drama and seemingly played out in the context of landed gentry at least, if not the aristocracy. She said they were Irish Catholics, that she and her sisters had gone to a convent school. She certainly played the part, not that she went to church, but she had a rosary and used to go on about the nuns. She told me her father was moved to tears by music, that he took her to hear a Wagner opera when she was much too young, which was why she didn’t like it. At the time I never doubted what she said, even if it verged on melodrama. When I asked her why one of her toes was a bit squashed, she said: “My race horse stepped on me.” The horse had run away with her and ended up in the centre of Cambridge, and she fell off in one of the colleges. Now it all sounds so improbable. Maybe I should have asked why there were no family photographs, or even any relatives on her side of the family. But my father seems to have accepted her account of things and as I grew up there seemed no reason to question her stories. It wasn’t until much later that I started to realise how odd it sounded. I think one of the reasons she carried it off was that she was an incredibly beautiful woman, and a talented portrait painter. So there was no reason to doubt her claim that she had studied at Chelsea School of Art alongside Dirk Bogarde, when Henry Moore was teaching sculpture there. Friends used to refer to her as the duchess because she behaved like one. She told me that I would be presented at court as a debutante, just as she had been. Of course, I believed her. With hindsight, I can see there were inconsistencies, but you couldn’t query anything. She clammed up as soon as you started talking about her family and changed the subject. She died on New Year’s Day 2007, aged 89, but when my brother and I cleared out her flat there was no birth certificate, which made me curious. So I sent off for it. When I opened the envelope, my first thought was that it was the wrong one because the name was Margaret Ada, whereas my mother had been Margo Adela. But her father’s name – Richard John Beasely – and date of birth were both correct. Then the penny began to drop – this was her birth certificate. At some point she must have changed her name to make it sound more refined. But what shocked me even more was seeing that her father was a fishmonger, her mother a housekeeper and they weren’t even married. The rest of the story began to unfold when I went to the public record office. As Mother had often referred to the fact that she was a twin, the clerk said her sister must be on the same page of the register. That was a spooky moment. We found the twin listed, with the name Janet Kathleen. I’m Dinah Kathleen, so I’d been named after her without ever knowing it. I discovered eight other siblings born outside marriage, all, at some time, living in the family home in Kensington, west London. I also discovered cousins in Minneapolis and Australia and, most astonishing of all, my mother’s younger sister Lily, still alive at the age of 91 and living near me. That was another moment, meeting my aunt for the first time. She didn’t hide the fact that she disliked my mother, saying: “Margaret considered herself better than the rest of us.” Disappointingly, Lily was unable to shed any light on what the family thought had happened to Margaret, or how they lost contact. Did she just disappear overnight? Her version has a lack of clarity, simply because of her age, though it’s clear she was glad to see the back of Mother and I can’t imagine she would have tried very hard to get back in touch. There’s a vague suggestion that people thought Margaret had emigrated to America, which probably suited her. But it was something Lily said about her own life that struck a chord with me. She claims to have fallen out with her own daughter 20 years ago, and they haven’t spoken since. That combative, argumentative nature, and the tendency to bear grudges is a recurring family trait, which I recognise because my mother was also prone to it. Maybe it helps to explain the rift. Lily went into service and later may have worked for a photographer. Some of the details of her life are hazy because she’s become a little forgetful. But what emerges from all the marriage and birth certificates I’ve collected is that all the brothers and sisters except Margo went into manual trades and became plumbers and electricians, and so on, whereas Margo managed to gain access to a much higher social echelon and more financial security than she was destined for at birth. Nowadays, Lily lives in a very modest flat whereas, even after 20 years as a widow, Margo lived in some style. She was always perfectly turned out, with the best clothes, shoes and handbags, and looked immaculate. People outside the family regarded her as charming and elegant. My impression is that Lily’s life was less happy. Though I still have a lot of questions about my mother’s life, it’s clear that from an early age she had the ambition to shed the family and its low social status. It’s sort of sad, even chilling, but at the same time you can admire the cleverness with which she did it. It also explains some of her incredibly fierce opinions. She thought having children outside marriage was terrible. She was absolutely scathing to a friend whose child had children without being married. When I was small, our behaviour had to be perfect. Anybody who said, “Pleased to meet you” rather than, “How do you do?” was beyond the pale and absolutely common. Of course, it came as a tremendous shock when Aunt Lily told me that my grandfather was a boozer and womaniser, but maybe it helps to explain Mother’s distaste for her origins. My father was a comfortably-off doctor in Malvern, so marrying him must have provided the social cachet she yearned for. All the more so because the family was quite gentrified, being directly descended from the founder of Lloyds bank. My paternal grandmother was quite a grande dame and highly intellectual, which made her frightening to me, but I can imagine my mother saw her as a role model. Mother was ill with cancer for her last six years, during which we got closer and closer. Once we were reminiscing about my childhood. I said my first memory was her ticking me off when I was about three. I’d been sitting outside the house with bunches of grape hyacinths I’d picked in the garden, trying to sell them to passersby. And she came and sort of snatched me up and said, “Good gracious, you look like a Gypsy!” We were giggling about that, so I asked, “What do you remember of your mother?” And she snapped, “Nothing!” I just left it, and let it hang, and after quite a long silence she said: “Perhaps I don’t want to remember.” Sometimes I wonder if she actually believed the stories that she’d made up because she told them so often that they were real to her. After she died, I discovered she’d been trying to trace her twin sister online. There’s a terrible pathos about that. Realising she was near the end, maybe she regretted cutting herself off from the family and wanted to see her twin again before she died. In fact, Janet had passed away in 1998. I think perhaps Mother succeeded because of the war and the social disruption it caused. And because she was talented and very beautiful. Part of me thinks she was damned clever to live a lie from 1939 and carry it off. You have to have a bit of admiration for that. She would be very cross with me for digging up her past, but I feel cross with her for keeping it secret. Particularly when we were so close at the end. It’s my heritage as well as hers. To discover cousins that might have been lifelong friends if I’d known them earlier felt strange. I suppose part of me was sad that she didn’t talk about it at the end when I gave her the opportunity. And to think that my grandfather was alive during my lifetime – that I could have met him but was never given the chance. Family Parents and parenting guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Betting shops face a real battle to beat the threat of online gambling and keep their doors open To the consternation of his peers, flamboyant Scottish bookmaker John Banks once famously called them “money factories – a licence to steal money”. But today, Britain’s 8,500 betting shops are shaping up to be the next high-street stalwarts faced with a fundamental reckoning, increasingly under threat from the rapacious spectre of online competition. Other high-street chains have been crushed, in some cases fatally, by the relentless advance of cyber retail juggernauts such as Amazon, Ebay and Play.com. Gone from shopping malls are Zavvi, Woolworths and Borders, while HMV and Waterstone’s remain on the critical list. In the US, Blockbuster has fallen into bankruptcy. Could Britain’s bookies, who on Sunday celebrate 50 years since betting shops were legalised, be next? Gambling is already one of the most profitable industries on the internet. Businesses such as bwin.party and Betfair, fledgling start-ups a decade ago, are now reaching parity with the likes of Ladbrokes and William Hill in terms of stock market valuations. While online firms have been booming, recent years have seen a considerable financial retrenchment among high-street operators. Gala Coral, the firm behind the 1,600-strong Coral chain, last year completed a tortuous debt restructuring which saw its three private-equity backers depart nursing £700m in losses. A year earlier, market leaders Ladbrokes and William Hill — running 2,080 and 2,350 shops respectively — both made cash calls on shareholders in order to bolster their balance sheets. It was a painful business, though it has left Ladbrokes and William Hill in particular far better equipped to fight back against the online competition than once they were, investing heavily in websites of their own, with considerable success. Both have told investors in stark terms, while the shops remain a core business, future earnings growth is most likely to be delivered online. Their main target is to catch up with Bet365, a roaring online success story started by Stoke-based brother and sister John and Denise Coates while working for their father’s small chain of betting shops. The venture, which last year made a pre-tax profit of £100m, has left Peter Coates, the 73-year-old chairman of Stoke City football club, one of the richest men in British bookmaking. Midlands bookmaker Warwick Bartlett, who started his first bookmakers at the age of 18 in 1965, believes the internet has changed everything. “We’re living in an age of iPhones and computers everywhere … If you look at the William Hill website on a Monday or Tuesday, they’ve got prices up there for 450 soccer matches throughout the world, and there’s in-play betting, which means you can bet throughout the game.” Shopping around for the best odds is so much easier online, adds Bartlett, who sold most of his 18 betting shops to Coral in 1984. “The payout to the customer has never been as high as it is today. It is possible now for a gambler, who is in control of his senses and really studies the form, to make gambling pay. In my day you never could,” he said. Fifty years ago on 1 May, the first licensed betting shops opened their doors in Britain, after the politicians at Westminster realised there was little point in continuing to criminalise a pastime that was so widely enjoyed throughout the country. Legislation brought in by Rab Butler overturned the 1853 Suppression of Betting Houses Act. Hard as it is to imagine, for five years their activities went untaxed. These no-frills, smoke-filled establishments were tightly bound by the guiding tenet at the heart of the 1961 act: that bookmakers not be allowed to stimulate demand for betting activity. That meant the windows were boarded up or blacked out, there was to be no advertising, and even the shop’s front door had to remain shut so that passers by might not be enticed by glimpses of goings-on inside. A sign just three-inches tall reading “licensed betting office” was all that was permitted on the shop frontage, together with the bookie’s name. Inside, racing commentary blared out over “the blower” (there were no television feeds until 1986), the prices were chalked up on boards by hand, and winnings were calculated at break-neck speed by an army of quick-witted staff – all of which is automated today. For those caught short, there were no toilets. “The premises will resemble undertakers’ parlours,” Butler said, though some recall the atmosphere in the first betting shops with great affection. Since the 1960s, there has been a steady acceptance of betting shops on the high street as they have come to be viewed affectionately by many as an important element within communities. By degree, bookmakers have been permitted to advertise across all media, live satellite pictures arrived in shops and transformed the atmosphere, and seven-day evening opening was sanctioned. Meanwhile, bookmakers have developed a bewildering array of sporting events and diversions, other than traditional horse and greyhound racing, on which they offer prices: golf, cricket, virtual racing and football are only the most obvious. Graham Sharpe, of William Hill, said: “Millions have been riding on what happens during and after the Royal Wedding, and it is incredible to recall that in 1977 I hit the headlines for turning down bets on the sex of Princess Anne’s baby as we thought there would be adverse criticism for doing so.” Betting shops have shown they can adapt and reinvent themselves. Never more so than in 2001 when, to the fury of the then Labour government, they introduced a new type of slot machine offering virtual roulette – a game until then thought to be legally restricted to casinos. Rules governing betting shop licensing forbade betting on events on the premises, but bookmakers had spotted an opportunity to use internet technology that could ensure the “virtual spin” of the cyber roulette wheel, which took place on a computer server at head office, with the result then beamed back to the terminal. Ultimately ministers’ objections faded: perhaps as they began to see machines as a tax opportunity. Even the state-owned Tote shops, which are about to be privatised, have embraced the roulette revolution. Today terminals offering virtual roulette are so popular that they generate about 40% of takings, considerably more than any other product in a betting shop. In effect, betting shops have become part bookmakers, part high-street casino. Without these terminals, most industry insiders agree, thousands of betting shops would have been pushed out of business in recent years. Whether high-street bookmakers can repeat this kind of coup to keep their prospects rosy remains to be seen. Gambling Sport betting William Hill Ladbrokes Simon Bowers guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …