Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1565)
First-class fare on the East Coast line

The East Coast line’s dining cars have long pampered travellers. Now they are being withdrawn, Patrick Barkham joins the 16.30 from King’s Cross On a white tablecloth before me is a venison and pistachio terrine, two slabs of medium- rare ribeye and a plate of British cheeses. A gentle tinkle of silver cutlery, and unsurpassed views of the British countryside – May blossom, a paddock of horses, children on BMXs – unfurl under a setting sun. If this was the opening of a new restaurant, critics would be salivating. But this unique dining experience is, in fact, closing in three weeks. The east coast mainline’s 15 restaurant cars are being withdrawn from service , ending a 132-year tradition on the grand old route between King’s Cross, Newcastle and Edinburgh. The only crumb of comfort? The British restaurant car will survive on four trains a day between Paddington and Penzance. Dining cars were once the gilding on the age of the train. When James Bond enjoyed dinner on the Orient Express and watched his ally Captain Nash order red wine with fish , Bond knew he was really a Spectre assassin impersonating an English gentleman. In Stella Artois’ latest ad campaign , the dining carriage is the ultimate destination for the social-climbing drinker. These gently swaying restaurants have always been a classy public place where even grubby standard class passengers could taste first-class treatment. As a waiter on the East Coast service recalls, lone diners would complain about being seated together, but once the wine started flowing they would all be chatting and swapping business cards. “The deals that got done in this car,” he sighs. It is telling that East Coast ‘s restaurant car is being replaced by a new, dedicated quiet coach in first class. Travellers, it seems, no longer want fine dining, or a chance to socialise; we prefer to cocoon ourselves in a private world, logged on, spilling sandwich crumbs on our keyboards. So East Coast, the publicly owned company charged with spicing up the route ahead of re-privatisation, is following the example of Virgin and Eurostar and introducing “at-seat” dining – “free” hot meals for all first-class passengers. Almost half of the customers surveyed favoured these airline-style meals, says a spokesman; the rest, it seems, expressed no clear preference. To see what is being lost I boarded the 16:30 to Newark North Gate. There were no Bond villains or Stella babes; just me and four other business people. The venison terrine was nicely spiced; a perfect accompaniment to the vista north of Stevenage. As Peterborough cathedral hove into view, so did the ribeye – tender, enormous and perfectly cooked, delivered with silver service. I could choose from a selection of fine wines, prosecco or whisky but – Bond would assassinate me for this – it had to be a can of John Smiths. Between mouthfuls of Blacksticks blue cheese, I asked another diner, Alan Griffin, if he was saddened by the decline of the dining car. “The standard of food you get at a first-class seat when there isn’t a restaurant car definitely isn’t as good, so I do regret it a bit,” he says. “I don’t know what the motivation is but I assume it’s to make more money.” East Coast says the withdrawal of the cars is part of a £12m programme featuring 19 extra services a week, including new return services to Lincoln and Harrogate and a four-hour “Flying Scotsman” service from Edinburgh to London. Most of all, though, East Coast wants to increase disparity between standard and first class – or, as it prefers to put it, increase the incentive to travel first class – by offering free meals at every first-class seat. Surely serving a million meals each year instead of 100,000 will reduce quality? “We understand the heritage of the route and fine dining is very important for our consumers. We’re working very hard with suppliers to ensure the quality and variety remains as high as people expect,” says the spokesman. “It’s about providing better value with the first-class ticket.” Passengers are also suspicious that it will push up the price of first-class tickets. Serving all these extra meals certainly means the friendly train staff will no longer have the time to provide such excellent service. “It’s expensive, but you’ve got this,” says one of the train stewards, pointing to the woodlands and brilliant yellow fields of oilseed rape as I pay my £32.45 bill. To me that seems excellent value for such an elevated experience. The return journey from Newark North Gate, slumped in a standard seat and plugged into my laptop, seems both more hurried and a lot slower. Rail travel Patrick Barkham guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Clare Maguire: Only fools rush in

First she turned down Jay-Z’s label, then she said no to a Jarvis Cocker track – not bad for someone who had just quit Topshop. Alexis Petridis meets singer-songwriter Clare Maguire The day she met Rick Rubin , says Clare Maguire , was “probably the most brilliant day of my life”. She was looking for a record deal, and was summoned to the Malibu home of the legendary producer and co-president of Columbia Records to perform for him. “I was just a huge fan of the records he made with Johnny Cash ,” she says. “I get there and there’s this big picture of Johnny Cash and [his wife] June Carter on the wall. We went into his kitchen and he gave me a guitar. I was so all over the place, the only song I could think of was an old Irish folk song. So I sang that, and he liked it. And because I was talking about Johnny Cash, he started playing me some tracks they’d done together that hadn’t been released.” This caused the 23-year-old to burst into tears: “It was just so overwhelming.” In a final flourish, Rubin suggested they go to see Leonard Cohen rehearsing, presumably in order to demonstrate what an artist who’s spent 44 years signed to Columbia looks like. “He was the nicest man I think I’ve ever met. He had this thing in his eyes, where he looked so kind and so genuine, and you just knew it was all about the music for him, and he was like . . .” Her voice tails off. “Just really . . . ” she says, before giving up trying to find words to describe him. But despite Rubin’s compound wonderfulness, the peek into the Cash archive and the presence of Cohen, she didn’t sign to his label. “No, no, no, no,” she frowns. “I was thinking, ‘Where can I go that, if I make a record, it’s going to get to as many people as possible?” I signed to the label that could do the most for me.” That was Polydor. You could, if you wished, say this anecdote tells you a lot about Maguire. It certainly tells you something about how desperate labels were to get her signature, and how improbable the ensuing bidding war must have seemed to someone who had been working in Topshop while playing Bruce Springsteen covers in Birmingham pubs by night. A few weeks before the Rubin incident, another label took her to The Spotted Pig , the New York gastropub co-owned by Jay-Z, when the rapper turned up (“I think the guy from the label texted him,” she notes, wryly). Jay-Z whisked her away from her burger, bought her drinks and told her that he could see that she was a star. “He said, ‘You can always tell someone’s going to be big because you can see the determination in their eyes.’ And, because I’d had five shots, I went, [drunk voice] ‘Can you see it in my eyes?’ and he said, ‘Yeah.’” But the thanks-but-no-thanks denouement suggests a certain steely determination on the part of Maguire to do things her way. It isn’t necessarily what you’d expect from an artist working in commercial pop-rock, albeit with a vaguely gothic twist on the evidence of debut album Light After Dark (she thinks the bleakness in her music might come from her parents’ love of Irish folk songs “where someone always dies at the end”). She also has an immensely powerful voice, which she discovered when starring in a school musical aged six. As is the way with artists working in vaguely commercial pop-rock, Maguire was encouraged by her record company to work with professional songwriters: not just the usual big guns for hire, such as Linda Perry , but Jarvis Cocker and Plan B . She was still living in a bedsit at the time, but turned all the results down. “I found that hard, because when you’re in the studio writing with someone, it’s such a personal thing, so intense. I hate to let people down.” You can see why labels thought she might be a star. Sitting in a Soho members’ club, picking at her macaroni cheese, she already looks like one. Her hair is dyed black and her grey-green eyes are ringed with kohl in the time-honoured manner of the provincial goth, but the dress is designer and the shoes are from outer space: a riot of grey suede and lace trimmings. She is charming but driven. Maguire left school in Solihull at 17, after an altercation with a teacher who suggested she might consider applying to university. “He basically said to me I’d never make it, which was the wrong thing to say. I was quite rebellious, very obsessed with the fact that [this] was what I wanted to do.” She is alleged to have signed in the end for what one journalist called “an eye-watering sum of money” (“Well, it all goes into the live show,” she frowns, “Me, personally, I don’t get that much”), which presumably means there’s an immense weight of expectation on her shoulders. Her debut album went top 10, but the singles so far have failed to break the top 20. “I’m not scared,” she says. “I’m getting a following; it may not be massive yet, but it’s there.” Besides, she says, she has enough to keep her occupied: video shoots, working with drum’n’bass producers Chase and Status , a second album “which I’ve already told the record company I want to make for June and they’re like, ‘You can’t do that.’” When we speak, she is preparing for her debut show at at London’s G-A-Y club. “It’s the biggest thing I’ve done. Four dancers covered in body paint, gold from head to toe,” she enthuses. “Everything’s in white on stage; it’s supposed to look like heaven. The gay clubs allow you to do that visual thing more. And I’ve got a solid gay fanbase, which is surprising, but they’re really sweet. They set up fan pages for me and bring me Valentine’s cards. “People either really like what I do, or not, but the ones who like it kind of start obsessing about it. I knew I’d get that. It’s a love it or hate it thing. It’s got some raw elements, but it’s very polished, it’s very bold, quite pop, and then there’s the voice, obviously. Some people are just going to . . .” Lost

Continue reading …

The raid on Osama bin Laden’s Abbottabad compound may turn out to be an intelligence triumph as well as a military one: The Navy SEALs who took Osama down also took his computers with them, seizing drives, disks, PCs, thumb drives, and other electronic equipment. An official tells Politico that…

Continue reading …

Last year’s Tony Awards saw a plethora of Hollywood winners— to the annoyance of some —but this year looks to be a different story. Quite a few big names were skipped over when nominations were announced today, most notably former frontrunner Daniel Radcliffe for How to Succeed in Business Without…

Continue reading …

Yvette Vickers, a former Playboy playmate and B-movie star, was found dead in her Los Angeles home last week, the Times reports. A neighbor, concerned when she noticed yellowing letters and cobwebs collecting in Vickers’ mailbox, found the 82-year-old woman’s mummified body. Police say she could have been dead close…

Continue reading …

Sony’s got another security breach on its hands. This time, hackers may have made off with the information of about 24 million users of Sony Online Entertainment products, which include games like Everquest and DC Universe Online. Sony doesn’t think credit card information was stolen, but hackers also breached an…

Continue reading …
Heated cabinet row over AV ‘smears’

Coalition tensions rise over what could be crushing victory for no campaign in Thursday’s referendum on alternative vote Coalition tensions over what could be a crushing victory for the no campaign in Thursday’s referendum on the alternative vote have exploded into extraordinary scenes in cabinet , with the Liberal Democrat energy secretary, Chris Huhne, confronting David Cameron and George Osborne over campaign leaflets that he believed smeared Nick Clegg. During the ensuing row, Osborne said he was not going to be challenged by a cabinet colleague acting as if he was “Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight”. In tense exchanges, leaked by Conservative sources within an hour of the cabinet meeting, Huhne demanded to know if Cameron would disassociate himself from the leaflets issued by the no campaign that he said had smeared Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems. He challenged the prime minister to sack any Conservative official linked to this literature, which said Clegg had broken promises. Cameron replied that he was not responsible for the all-party no campaign literature. Huhne then asked the chancellor whether he had any knowledge of the literature. Osborne apparently replied that this was always going to be a difficult period for the coalition. When Huhne again asked him to explain if he had known of the leaflets, Osborne complained that cabinet was not the right venue for this discussion before making his Paxman remark. Huhne then suggested that people would draw their own conclusions from the pair’s failure to condemn such smears on the deputy prime minister. Huhne did not consult Nick Clegg before his demarche and defended his role in the confrontation. “I think these have been unacceptable leaflets,” he said. “In any other walk of life such behaviour would be seen as nasty, personal and vindictive.” He added: “The home secretary Theresa May used to characterise the Tory party as the nasty party and this episode shows it has a way to go to before it achieves full rehabilitation. The underhand tactics show how desperate the political establishment is to hang on to power.” Huhne’s increasingly bitter public attacks on his coalition colleagues, including such a direct challenge to the prime minister, were dismissed as a yes campaign stunt by Tory sources. The row also angered parts of the all-party yes campaign that saw the inter-party row as a distraction from its final push message, as well as an attempt to highlight the no campaign’s failure to disclose all its funding. One yes campaign spokesman said: “Nothing Huhne has done has been authorised by us, or been helpful to us. The difficulty from day one was that we didn’t want the referendum seen through the prism of the coalition.” A ComRes poll published by the Independent on Tuesday showed the no camp romping home by a massive 66% to 35% among those saying they were certain to vote. Yes campaigners sensed defeat was inevitable. Meanwhile the yes campaign published an appeal signed by Ed Miliband, David Miliband, Lord Ashdown, Gordon Brown, Nick Clegg and two-thirds of the shadow cabinet calling for a yes vote. Ed Miliband also made his most explicit appeal for a yes vote on the basis that it could help nurture an anti-Tory progressive alliance in the country. Labour has always been at its best when it been a force for political reform. Writing for Comment is Free, he said: “If you believe this is a big C conservative country then perhaps you will believe that when forced to choose and elect someone with more than 50% of the vote, it will aid the right. “But if you believe that this is a genuinely progressive country, then we need an electoral system that can reflect the views of the electorate and give expression to the anti-conservative majority.” But the former Labour cabinet minister Lord Boateng lambasted the appeal for a progressive left. “The irony is overwhelming Lib Dem cabinet ministers trying to unite the left while they prop up a Conservative government implementing Conservative policies. If the Lib Dems find the Tories so distasteful you have to ask why they continue in government then.” John Healey, the shadow health secretary, also shared a platform with May to say the only reason the referendum was being held was because the alternative vote “gives the Liberal Democrats an open return to power, gives the Lib Dems a way into government election after election, and gives the Lib Dems a shield against loss of support”. Huhne insisted he was not planning to resign, adding whatever the Liberal Democrats do after the results come in on Friday will be done as a team. Huhne is known to want the coalition to continue, but is understood to believe personal trust between the parties has been lost irrevocably. One source said: “From now we will be consulting the lawyers first when we are offered an agreement by our coalition partners.” Support for a more businesslike approach towards the coalition is also coming from another Lib Dem cabinet minister, Vince Cable. Cameron will deny he is making any explicit concessions, but there are already signs he is backtracking on health, public services reform and the speed with which he brings in elected police commissioners. AV referendum Alternative vote Liberal-Conservative coalition Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Heated cabinet row over AV ‘smears’

Coalition tensions rise over what could be crushing victory for no campaign in Thursday’s referendum on alternative vote Coalition tensions over what could be a crushing victory for the no campaign in Thursday’s referendum on the alternative vote have exploded into extraordinary scenes in cabinet , with the Liberal Democrat energy secretary, Chris Huhne, confronting David Cameron and George Osborne over campaign leaflets that he believed smeared Nick Clegg. During the ensuing row, Osborne said he was not going to be challenged by a cabinet colleague acting as if he was “Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight”. In tense exchanges, leaked by Conservative sources within an hour of the cabinet meeting, Huhne demanded to know if Cameron would disassociate himself from the leaflets issued by the no campaign that he said had smeared Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems. He challenged the prime minister to sack any Conservative official linked to this literature, which said Clegg had broken promises. Cameron replied that he was not responsible for the all-party no campaign literature. Huhne then asked the chancellor whether he had any knowledge of the literature. Osborne apparently replied that this was always going to be a difficult period for the coalition. When Huhne again asked him to explain if he had known of the leaflets, Osborne complained that cabinet was not the right venue for this discussion before making his Paxman remark. Huhne then suggested that people would draw their own conclusions from the pair’s failure to condemn such smears on the deputy prime minister. Huhne did not consult Nick Clegg before his demarche and defended his role in the confrontation. “I think these have been unacceptable leaflets,” he said. “In any other walk of life such behaviour would be seen as nasty, personal and vindictive.” He added: “The home secretary Theresa May used to characterise the Tory party as the nasty party and this episode shows it has a way to go to before it achieves full rehabilitation. The underhand tactics show how desperate the political establishment is to hang on to power.” Huhne’s increasingly bitter public attacks on his coalition colleagues, including such a direct challenge to the prime minister, were dismissed as a yes campaign stunt by Tory sources. The row also angered parts of the all-party yes campaign that saw the inter-party row as a distraction from its final push message, as well as an attempt to highlight the no campaign’s failure to disclose all its funding. One yes campaign spokesman said: “Nothing Huhne has done has been authorised by us, or been helpful to us. The difficulty from day one was that we didn’t want the referendum seen through the prism of the coalition.” A ComRes poll published by the Independent on Tuesday showed the no camp romping home by a massive 66% to 35% among those saying they were certain to vote. Yes campaigners sensed defeat was inevitable. Meanwhile the yes campaign published an appeal signed by Ed Miliband, David Miliband, Lord Ashdown, Gordon Brown, Nick Clegg and two-thirds of the shadow cabinet calling for a yes vote. Ed Miliband also made his most explicit appeal for a yes vote on the basis that it could help nurture an anti-Tory progressive alliance in the country. Labour has always been at its best when it been a force for political reform. Writing for Comment is Free, he said: “If you believe this is a big C conservative country then perhaps you will believe that when forced to choose and elect someone with more than 50% of the vote, it will aid the right. “But if you believe that this is a genuinely progressive country, then we need an electoral system that can reflect the views of the electorate and give expression to the anti-conservative majority.” But the former Labour cabinet minister Lord Boateng lambasted the appeal for a progressive left. “The irony is overwhelming Lib Dem cabinet ministers trying to unite the left while they prop up a Conservative government implementing Conservative policies. If the Lib Dems find the Tories so distasteful you have to ask why they continue in government then.” John Healey, the shadow health secretary, also shared a platform with May to say the only reason the referendum was being held was because the alternative vote “gives the Liberal Democrats an open return to power, gives the Lib Dems a way into government election after election, and gives the Lib Dems a shield against loss of support”. Huhne insisted he was not planning to resign, adding whatever the Liberal Democrats do after the results come in on Friday will be done as a team. Huhne is known to want the coalition to continue, but is understood to believe personal trust between the parties has been lost irrevocably. One source said: “From now we will be consulting the lawyers first when we are offered an agreement by our coalition partners.” Support for a more businesslike approach towards the coalition is also coming from another Lib Dem cabinet minister, Vince Cable. Cameron will deny he is making any explicit concessions, but there are already signs he is backtracking on health, public services reform and the speed with which he brings in elected police commissioners. AV referendum Alternative vote Liberal-Conservative coalition Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Heated cabinet row over AV ‘smears’

Coalition tensions rise over what could be crushing victory for no campaign in Thursday’s referendum on alternative vote Coalition tensions over what could be a crushing victory for the no campaign in Thursday’s referendum on the alternative vote have exploded into extraordinary scenes in cabinet , with the Liberal Democrat energy secretary, Chris Huhne, confronting David Cameron and George Osborne over campaign leaflets that he believed smeared Nick Clegg. During the ensuing row, Osborne said he was not going to be challenged by a cabinet colleague acting as if he was “Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight”. In tense exchanges, leaked by Conservative sources within an hour of the cabinet meeting, Huhne demanded to know if Cameron would disassociate himself from the leaflets issued by the no campaign that he said had smeared Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems. He challenged the prime minister to sack any Conservative official linked to this literature, which said Clegg had broken promises. Cameron replied that he was not responsible for the all-party no campaign literature. Huhne then asked the chancellor whether he had any knowledge of the literature. Osborne apparently replied that this was always going to be a difficult period for the coalition. When Huhne again asked him to explain if he had known of the leaflets, Osborne complained that cabinet was not the right venue for this discussion before making his Paxman remark. Huhne then suggested that people would draw their own conclusions from the pair’s failure to condemn such smears on the deputy prime minister. Huhne did not consult Nick Clegg before his demarche and defended his role in the confrontation. “I think these have been unacceptable leaflets,” he said. “In any other walk of life such behaviour would be seen as nasty, personal and vindictive.” He added: “The home secretary Theresa May used to characterise the Tory party as the nasty party and this episode shows it has a way to go to before it achieves full rehabilitation. The underhand tactics show how desperate the political establishment is to hang on to power.” Huhne’s increasingly bitter public attacks on his coalition colleagues, including such a direct challenge to the prime minister, were dismissed as a yes campaign stunt by Tory sources. The row also angered parts of the all-party yes campaign that saw the inter-party row as a distraction from its final push message, as well as an attempt to highlight the no campaign’s failure to disclose all its funding. One yes campaign spokesman said: “Nothing Huhne has done has been authorised by us, or been helpful to us. The difficulty from day one was that we didn’t want the referendum seen through the prism of the coalition.” A ComRes poll published by the Independent on Tuesday showed the no camp romping home by a massive 66% to 35% among those saying they were certain to vote. Yes campaigners sensed defeat was inevitable. Meanwhile the yes campaign published an appeal signed by Ed Miliband, David Miliband, Lord Ashdown, Gordon Brown, Nick Clegg and two-thirds of the shadow cabinet calling for a yes vote. Ed Miliband also made his most explicit appeal for a yes vote on the basis that it could help nurture an anti-Tory progressive alliance in the country. Labour has always been at its best when it been a force for political reform. Writing for Comment is Free, he said: “If you believe this is a big C conservative country then perhaps you will believe that when forced to choose and elect someone with more than 50% of the vote, it will aid the right. “But if you believe that this is a genuinely progressive country, then we need an electoral system that can reflect the views of the electorate and give expression to the anti-conservative majority.” But the former Labour cabinet minister Lord Boateng lambasted the appeal for a progressive left. “The irony is overwhelming Lib Dem cabinet ministers trying to unite the left while they prop up a Conservative government implementing Conservative policies. If the Lib Dems find the Tories so distasteful you have to ask why they continue in government then.” John Healey, the shadow health secretary, also shared a platform with May to say the only reason the referendum was being held was because the alternative vote “gives the Liberal Democrats an open return to power, gives the Lib Dems a way into government election after election, and gives the Lib Dems a shield against loss of support”. Huhne insisted he was not planning to resign, adding whatever the Liberal Democrats do after the results come in on Friday will be done as a team. Huhne is known to want the coalition to continue, but is understood to believe personal trust between the parties has been lost irrevocably. One source said: “From now we will be consulting the lawyers first when we are offered an agreement by our coalition partners.” Support for a more businesslike approach towards the coalition is also coming from another Lib Dem cabinet minister, Vince Cable. Cameron will deny he is making any explicit concessions, but there are already signs he is backtracking on health, public services reform and the speed with which he brings in elected police commissioners. AV referendum Alternative vote Liberal-Conservative coalition Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Heated cabinet row over AV ‘smears’

Coalition tensions rise over what could be crushing victory for no campaign in Thursday’s referendum on alternative vote Coalition tensions over what could be a crushing victory for the no campaign in Thursday’s referendum on the alternative vote have exploded into extraordinary scenes in cabinet , with the Liberal Democrat energy secretary, Chris Huhne, confronting David Cameron and George Osborne over campaign leaflets that he believed smeared Nick Clegg. During the ensuing row, Osborne said he was not going to be challenged by a cabinet colleague acting as if he was “Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight”. In tense exchanges, leaked by Conservative sources within an hour of the cabinet meeting, Huhne demanded to know if Cameron would disassociate himself from the leaflets issued by the no campaign that he said had smeared Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems. He challenged the prime minister to sack any Conservative official linked to this literature, which said Clegg had broken promises. Cameron replied that he was not responsible for the all-party no campaign literature. Huhne then asked the chancellor whether he had any knowledge of the literature. Osborne apparently replied that this was always going to be a difficult period for the coalition. When Huhne again asked him to explain if he had known of the leaflets, Osborne complained that cabinet was not the right venue for this discussion before making his Paxman remark. Huhne then suggested that people would draw their own conclusions from the pair’s failure to condemn such smears on the deputy prime minister. Huhne did not consult Nick Clegg before his demarche and defended his role in the confrontation. “I think these have been unacceptable leaflets,” he said. “In any other walk of life such behaviour would be seen as nasty, personal and vindictive.” He added: “The home secretary Theresa May used to characterise the Tory party as the nasty party and this episode shows it has a way to go to before it achieves full rehabilitation. The underhand tactics show how desperate the political establishment is to hang on to power.” Huhne’s increasingly bitter public attacks on his coalition colleagues, including such a direct challenge to the prime minister, were dismissed as a yes campaign stunt by Tory sources. The row also angered parts of the all-party yes campaign that saw the inter-party row as a distraction from its final push message, as well as an attempt to highlight the no campaign’s failure to disclose all its funding. One yes campaign spokesman said: “Nothing Huhne has done has been authorised by us, or been helpful to us. The difficulty from day one was that we didn’t want the referendum seen through the prism of the coalition.” A ComRes poll published by the Independent on Tuesday showed the no camp romping home by a massive 66% to 35% among those saying they were certain to vote. Yes campaigners sensed defeat was inevitable. Meanwhile the yes campaign published an appeal signed by Ed Miliband, David Miliband, Lord Ashdown, Gordon Brown, Nick Clegg and two-thirds of the shadow cabinet calling for a yes vote. Ed Miliband also made his most explicit appeal for a yes vote on the basis that it could help nurture an anti-Tory progressive alliance in the country. Labour has always been at its best when it been a force for political reform. Writing for Comment is Free, he said: “If you believe this is a big C conservative country then perhaps you will believe that when forced to choose and elect someone with more than 50% of the vote, it will aid the right. “But if you believe that this is a genuinely progressive country, then we need an electoral system that can reflect the views of the electorate and give expression to the anti-conservative majority.” But the former Labour cabinet minister Lord Boateng lambasted the appeal for a progressive left. “The irony is overwhelming Lib Dem cabinet ministers trying to unite the left while they prop up a Conservative government implementing Conservative policies. If the Lib Dems find the Tories so distasteful you have to ask why they continue in government then.” John Healey, the shadow health secretary, also shared a platform with May to say the only reason the referendum was being held was because the alternative vote “gives the Liberal Democrats an open return to power, gives the Lib Dems a way into government election after election, and gives the Lib Dems a shield against loss of support”. Huhne insisted he was not planning to resign, adding whatever the Liberal Democrats do after the results come in on Friday will be done as a team. Huhne is known to want the coalition to continue, but is understood to believe personal trust between the parties has been lost irrevocably. One source said: “From now we will be consulting the lawyers first when we are offered an agreement by our coalition partners.” Support for a more businesslike approach towards the coalition is also coming from another Lib Dem cabinet minister, Vince Cable. Cameron will deny he is making any explicit concessions, but there are already signs he is backtracking on health, public services reform and the speed with which he brings in elected police commissioners. AV referendum Alternative vote Liberal-Conservative coalition Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …