Gruesome photos taken in the aftermath of the US raid on Bin Laden’s Pakistani hideout show bodies of al-Qaida militants Gruesome photos taken in the immediate aftermath of the US raid on Osama bin Laden’s Pakistani hideout have emerged showing the blood-soaked bodies of three unidentified al-Qaida militants. Reuters released the pictures as the Obama administration announced it would not be publishing a picture of Bin Laden’s body. The disturbing images, the release of which has not been sanctioned by the White House, give a sense of the extreme violence employed by US Navy Seals as they stormed through the compound in the early hours of Monday. Two of the men lie in pools of congealed blood; a third lies prone with his arms flung over his head. Around are scattered hints of life before the Americans struck: computer cables, bedding, a tin mug and a plastic gun. The photos may also explain why the White House is refusing to release a similar image of Bin Laden: if it is nearly as graphic, it could provide an incendiary rallying point to America’s Islamist enemies. Security in New York and Washington, as well as at US bases and embassies round the world, have been stepped up in case of al-Qaida retaliation over the killing. The pictures emerged as the Obama administration insisted the killing of Bin Laden was legal and not an execution, while human rights groups and international lawyers pressed the White House for more details of the mission. Eric Holder, the US attorney-general, said the killing was justified and that had Bin Laden attempted to surrender, the US forces would have taken him alive. Meanwhile a senior Pakistani intelligence official told the Guardian that members of the Bin Laden family were being held in custody in Pakistan, including his Yemeni-born wife, Amal Ahmed al-Sadah, and his 12-year-old daughter, who allegedly claimed her father had been shot in cold-blood in front of her. The official did not confirm a report by al-Arabiya news that the daughter is claiming her father had been held first and then shot. George Little, a CIA spokesman, denied Bin Laden had been held by US forces before being shot. “There is no indication that Bin Laden was somehow captured and later killed inside the compound. It would be wrong to suggest otherwise.” Questions about the legality of the killing have grown after the White House backtracked on Tuesday on its initial account of the mission, admitting that Bin Laden had not been armed. The White House spokesman, Jay Carney, refused to provide further details about the shooting in Abbottabad. The Obama administration has been forced on the defensive after offering conflicting accounts of what happened. Asked on Wednesday whether the team that killed Obama had come under fire, Carney said the White House had gone to the limit in providing details and that any more would risk future operations. “I am not going to get into operational details,” he said. Carney, asked about the legality of the killing, read from a statement, saying it was consistent with the laws of war and that if Bin Laden had surrendered, he would have been taken alive. Holder, giving evidence to the Senate armed services committee, said it had not been a kill mission but “a kill or capture” mission. “If he had surrendered, attempted to surrender, I think we should obviously have accepted that, but there was no indication that he wanted to do that and therefore his killing was appropriate,” Holder said. The attorney-general said Bin Laden had no intention of being captured. “Let me make something very clear, the operation in which Osama bin Laden was killed was lawful. He was the head of al-Qaida, an organisation that had conducted the attacks of September 11. He admitted his involvement,” Holder said. Andrea Prasow, a Washington-based spokeswoman for Human Rights Watch, said: “Our position is that we do not have enough information to determine whether the killing of Bin Laden was lawful. We hope the US government will provide a more detailed accounting of what happened so we can understand if it was in fact lawful under either international humanitarian law – the so-called law of war – or under human rights law.” Philippe Sands, a University College London professor currently writing a book on the making of modern international law, said much would depend on the exact circumstances of Bin Laden’s death. “If no one else was around, if they had him in a room unarmed and the building was covered, then it looks pretty bad,” Sands said. He added that the US would have an additional layer of defence under international law. The “doctrine of necessity” excuses wrongdoing if the actions taken can be demonstrated to be the only way to protect an essential interest, like the lives of large number of citizens. Benjamin Ferencz, an American lawyer who was a US prosecutor at the Nuremburg trials and who lives in New York state, asked whether the killing was justifiable self-defence or premeditated illegal assassination. He would have preferred he had been captured and put on trial. Ferencz, 92, said : “The picture I get is that a bunch of highly trained, heavily armed soldiers find an old guy in pyjamas and shot him in the chest and head and that borders, without access to more facts, on murder.” He added: “Even [the head of the Luftwaffe Hermann] Göring had a right to trial.” The rules of engagement for the Seal team made it unlikely that Bin Laden would have had much chance to surrender. The counterterrorism adviser at the White House, John Brennan, in an interview with Fox, said he could only have surrendered if the team believed he did not pose a threat and were confident he did not have a bomb under his clothes. The Pakistani authorities may get confirmation or a conflicting account from the members of Bin Laden’s family and others from the compound it has in custody. Pakistani intelligence said it would not allow the US to interrogate them. “That would occur only if there was written assent from their country of origin. We are yet to receive any request to my knowledge but given the [critical] statements coming out of Washington and the fact that this [the raid] was not an operation we were involved in, we would not accept,” the Pakistani intelligence official said. Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Global terrorism Pakistan United States Ewen MacAskill Declan Walsh Julian Borger guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Good news: The poetry and theater majors of the world are not leading lives as starving artists, at least not according to a new survey of arts graduates. USA Today reports on the national survey of some 13,581 alumni of 154 arts programs who studied everything from dance to…
Continue reading …The Obama administration is planning to propose a new set of cuts in the corporate tax rate, hoping to strike a vein of bipartisan cooperation. “This would send a reassuring signal to the economy, and is something both parties should support in theory,” a senior administration official tells Politico , though…
Continue reading …A Georgia woman would like a thief to return her Nissan Altima—and her grandmother’s ashes. Ebony Simpson stopped off at a supermarket on her way home from her grandmother’s memorial service and a thief made off with her car, along with the urn in the trunk, after taking the…
Continue reading …Queen guitarist Brian May is championing the rights of Britain’s animals, from foxes to rats. Now he talks about his latest battle – on behalf of badgers The shrubbery rustles and shakes, then Brian May falls out of the rhododendrons, dusts himself down and stumbles towards five fox cubs at play in a clearing. In the landscaped gardens of his historic home in the Surrey hills, the Queen guitarist looks every inch the semi-retired rock star: huge curly hair on gangly frame, black trousers, immaculate white Pumas and a dangerously unbuttoned white shirt. May has a plethora of projects to promote – every Queen album is being digitally remastered to celebrate the band’s 40th anniversary this year; next month he will tour the country with Kerry Ellis, who starred in his musical We Will Rock You, and with whom he has written a new album; he has just played guitar on a new Lady Gaga track; and a documentary he has made about the history of 3D will be broadcast on Sky. But instead, the 63-year-old musician and astrophysicist is crooning softly to the fox cub he has clutched to his chest. In the state-of-the-art animal rescue centre May has built in his garden, the guitarist behind Britain’s biggest-selling album (Queen’s Greatest Hits) is currently nursing back to health 140 hedgehogs and half-a-dozen abandoned fox cubs. He is also fast becoming the public face of the campaign to stop a cull of badgers proposed by the authorities to answer the concerns of farmers who are convinced the animals are infecting cattle with bovine TB. Multimillionaire rock legends often dabble in fast cars, metal detecting or saving rainforests. Is May worried his anti-cull campaign will be dismissed as just another rock star hobby? “Hobby, hmmm,” he murmurs, treating the word with a quiet disgust. “There aren’t many people from rock music or entertainment who put the time in that I have . . . this has become a huge part of my life. I don’t care what people say. I’m not doing it to make money. I’m not doing it because I want to be famous. Even if it was a ‘hobby’, why would I have that hobby? It could only be because I care about animals. This concerns us all. It’s not just something that concerns farmers.” May, who simultaneously channels the ethereal otherworldliness of a long-term resident of planet rock with the precision of a professional scientist, came to this passion through blogging. He began his “soapbox” before blogging was fashionable and although gentle and softly-spoken in person, he lets off steam online: his rants on subjects such as a review of Mika’s album by the Guardian’s Alexis Petridis have led him to be dubbed the world’s grumpiest rock star. His intention, he says, is to discuss important issues “so if you want to call it being grumpy, yeah, but it’s being concerned and trying to raise awareness of things which need to be fixed”. There are “joyful” posts about music, astronomy and 3D on the soapbox, but May is most profoundly anguished about cruelty towards animals. The blog “changed my life completely because it’s a two-way communication”, he says. “I started talking about animals with people on the soapbox.” May has never been an ordinary rock star. Helped by his father, he built his own guitar, Red Special, as a child. He abandoned his PhD on zodiacal light for fame with Queen but returned four years ago and completed it. He is a great friend of astronomer Sir Patrick Moore, with whom he has written Bang!, an accessible history of the universe. His love of animals has been less well documented but “it’s always been there”, says May a little defensively, highlighting his Queen song White Man as an example. He promised himself “if there was ever an opportunity in my life to make a difference for animals I would take it”. That opportunity came when someone contacted him online about a proposed cull of hedgehogs on the Scottish island of Uist. May was “aghast” and successfully fought to have the hedgehogs transported to the mainland instead. “When David Cameron started saying that if he got into power he would try to repeal the hunting act, my ears really pricked up and I thought if I can make a difference with hedgehogs maybe I can alert people to the possibility of going back into what I regard as something very barbaric,” he says. May, who is married to the actor Anita Dobson, and has three children from his first marriage, and three grandchildren, has set up a charity, Save Me, which rehabilitates injured wild animals, and is campaigning against the badger cull and any repeal of the hunting ban. Dobson is supportive but does not get involved. “Everybody has to work on their own passions,” says May very quietly. “So many people have said to me, foxes are just like rats, who gives a shit? And then you say, so a rat isn’t worthy of some consideration? Rats are so like human beings, it’s frightening. And it’s human beings who are relegating them to ‘vermin’. It gives people the feeling that they don’t have to treat animals with any kind of consideration, and to me that’s wrong.” May, who has long been an “imperfect vegetarian” but does not now eat meat or fish, “certainly wouldn’t” engage in direct action, such as releasing animals from scientific laboratories or mink from farms but thinks that animal rights has become a dirty word because its image has been “deliberately manipulated” by opponents who incorrectly characterise hunt saboteurs as violent. Hunting and killing animals for pleasure “boggles my mind”, he says. “I don’t understand why people are like that. I wrestle with that the whole time. It’s a sickness. I don’t think a healthy human being needs to be killing or causing pain to be happy. Why should that be? A decent life and a decent death – that’s what I ask for myself, and that’s what I would ask of any creature.” Ultimately, he believes animals have rights – both moral and legal – and wants to challenge “the mentality that says human beings are the only creatures on this planet who matter”. May happily plays with the fox cub he has named Caroline Spelman, after the environment secretary, but does not want to be caricatured as sentimental about animals. “I don’t really love badgers because they are furry and good-looking. It’s not about that. They are appealing, there’s no doubt, they are like little bears, especially when they are young. To me they are fascinating and rather mysterious because they have been in the British Isles longer than humans and they have their own social ways, not all of which is understood by us. “I can’t help but have a sort of awe for all wild creatures who have survived even the awfulness of what we have done to the world. We are the vandals in this world, there’s no doubt about it.” Despite being the first wild animal to be given legal protection in Britain, in 1973, the illegal “sport” of badger baiting and digging still goes on, and this year killing badgers is set to be sanctioned by the government – which wants to authorise farmers to trap and shoot them to reduce bovine TB. May is convinced this is the Conservatives’ political sop to the countryside lobby because, locked in coalition, they lack the numbers to repeal Labour’s hunting ban. “It’s a panacea that is being offered to farmers, look we are doing something, we are on your side, we’re going out and killing things,” he says. Bovine TB led to the slaughter of 24,899 cattle in England last year, costing £63m. Farmers insist the disease is a genuine crisis, and argue it has increased with a burgeoning badger population and that disease hotspots correspond to high badger populations, particularly in the West Country. May insists that it is still unproven that badgers pass TB to cattle (it is proven that cattle transmit it to badgers) and unproven that a cull would help. He quotes the conclusion of a 10-year culling trial in which 11,000 badgers were killed: culling cannot meaningfully contribute to the control of TB. After travelling to Cardiff to unsuccessfully plead with the Welsh assembly to reverse its own separate decision to cull badgers in Pembrokeshire, May admits he “got into a lot of trouble” for suggesting farmers should abandon cattle farming in bovine TB hotspots. “People called it a ridiculous idea but it came from a conversation I had with a farmer who had already switched from cows to sheep.” You would not knowingly bring up children in an area where there was radiation pollution, he says. “There was a nasty little piece” in the farming press that said telling farmers they should not farm cattle is “like telling Brian May he can’t play guitar and they said some people would welcome that. Ha ha, lovely. But there was a time when Queen was very uncool in Britain and what we did was play elsewhere. I actually took my family and my little boy went to school in LA partly because of that, so it’s not such a ridiculous suggestion.” “People talk about a science-based cull. I’m afraid to say people don’t know what science is,” he sighs. He believes bovine TB can be solved with vaccination – of badgers and cows. But the vaccination of cows is tricky: EU legislation forbids the export of vaccinated cows because it is difficult to distinguish between a vaccinated cow and one carrying bovine TB. In contrast, the vaccination of badgers is “eminently doable”, argues May. “All the research has been done. This business of ‘it’s not proven’ is really rubbish.” A badger vaccine is currently being trialled in Gloucestershire although the coalition cancelled five other trials put in place by Labour’s “exemplary” environment secretary Hilary Benn. The National Trust recently announced plans to vaccinate badgers on its land in Devon. May once said he stopped voting Conservative because of the party’s attitude towards wild animals. Now he says he is “very close” to the group Conservatives Against Fox Hunting, “who have the courage to stand up against the party line” but relates to the Green party more than any other. Did he vote Green at the last election? “You can’t ask me how I voted! It’s a secret vote. The truth is, I’m really not political. I just care about the animals. That’s my party. I’m a party that cares about changing attitudes to animals.” May has all the accoutrements of a multi-millionaire rock star – assistants running around, a stable full of gold discs and, incongruously, huge pink stems of rhubarb freshly picked from his organic garden – but says he scarcely gets time to enjoy the good things in his life. He has suffered depression, particularly after the death of his father and Freddie Mercury, and seems prone to pessimism, even bemoaning his follicular majesty when he has his photograph taken with his foxes. “It’s disappearing now,” he murmurs despondently, mussing his luxuriant curls. “The hair has seen better days.” Long nights awake debating with badger lovers and haters on the web can get “depressing”, he admits, especially when he is confronted with videos of animal cruelty. “It’s a thing you have to fight, being depressed about it. It’s very uncomfortable to see into the minds of people who are so full of violence. I find it very upsetting. It’s changed my life.Some mornings, I find it hard to deal with.” He pauses. “I get over it,” he shrugs and laughs at himself for the first time. Badgers Wildlife Animal welfare Patrick Barkham guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Some conservatives are arguing that Osama bin Laden’s death justifies Bush-era harsh interrogation techniques , but after looking at the trail of evidence, the New York Times concludes that torture played “a small role at most” in finding bin Laden’s courier. The detainee who provided the most crucial information about Abu…
Continue reading …Sarah Shourd says she is suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and going back to Iran would be too traumatic An American woman released from prison in Iran has said she will not return there to stand trial alongside two fellow hikers charged with spying for the US. Sarah Shourd said she has post-traumatic stress disorder and going back to Iran would be “far too traumatic after what I’ve already been through”. The three Americans deny illegally entering the country and espionage, a charge that can carry the death penalty. They said they were on an innocent hiking trip during a vacation in Kurdistan, in the north of Iraq, when they were arrested by Iranian soldiers on 31 July 2009. Shourd was freed on bail in September 2010 on health grounds, and returned to the United States. Her fiance, Shanee Bauer, and friend Josh Fattal, both still imprisoned in Tehran, are due to start a second session of their trial on 11 May. Bauer and Fattal pleaded innocent at a first trial and Shourd denied the charges in absentia. They say they did not realise they had crossed into Iran. Shourd said they had visited the tourist village of Ahmed Awa and then hiked along a trail that local people had recommended. “When Shane and Josh and I met the Iranian soldiers, we were completely shocked. There was absolutely no indication of a border.” Shourd said she was diagnosed with the stress disorder by a clinical forensic psychologist and the five-page evaluation had been sent to the Iranian revolutionary court. She had not had a response to her refusal to go back for trial on the grounds that she risked “renewed or even worse psychological problems” if she returns. “My own mental health makes me even more afraid for what is happening with Shane and Josh,” Shourd said. “I was there for 14 months and Shane and Josh have now been there for over 21 months. I can’t imagine the toll it’s taken on them.” Shourd, 32, had been living with Bauer, a freelance journalist, in Damascus where she taught English. Fattal, an environmentalist, then joined them in Damascus for a holiday. Bauer and Shourd became engaged after they were arrested. Iran Middle East United States US foreign policy David Batty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Mahmoud Abbas says deal turns ‘black page of division’ after signing deal with Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal in Egypt Rival Palestinian groups have hailed the signing of a reconciliation agreement that could change the parameters of the search for Middle East peace, amid trenchant opposition from Israel. Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the head of Fatah, and Khaled Meshaal, the leader of the Islamist movement Hamas, met for the first time in five years at a ceremony in Cairo on Wednesday, where Egypt’s transitional government pulled off a striking coup by brokering the deal. Abbas, Yasser Arafat’s successor as leader of the PLO, said they had turned forever the “black page of divisions”. Meshaal, also seeking to strike a historically resonant note, declared that Hamas’s bitter rift with Fatah was “behind us”. The potential of the agreement was underlined by the presence of representatives from the UN, the EU and the Arab League – all now digesting the diplomatic implications for the region. “We are certain of success so long as we are united,” Abbas said. “Reconciliation clears the way not only to putting the Palestinian house in order but also to a just peace.” The deal will make it easier for the Palestinians to go to the UN in September and demand broad international recognition of an independent state – without a negotiated peace agreement with Israel. It provides for the creation of a joint caretaker government before Palestinian-wide elections next year. It does not require Hamas to recognise Israel. But sensitivities and difficulties ahead were underlined by an argument over protocol –whether Meshaal should sit on the podium with Abbas or among other delegates in the hall. The agreement was hailed in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and refugee camps in Lebanon. But the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, savaged the accord as “a tremendous blow to peace and a great victory for terrorism”. Israel, which signed the 1993 Oslo agreement with the PLO, shuns Hamas, viewing it as a terrorist group committed to the destruction of the Jewish state. The former Hamas prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh, did not help the movement’s image when he praised Osama Bin Laden as an “Arab holy warrior”. “How can we make peace with a government when half of it calls for the destruction of Israel and glorifies the murderous Osama bin Laden?” Netanyahu said during a visit to London. Netanyahu has been lobbying for the EU and the US to cut aid to the PA if Hamas joins a new government. Meshaal, once the target of an assassination attempt by the Mossad, and now based in Damascus, Syria, spelled out Hamas’s goal: “Our aim is to establish a free and completely sovereign Palestinian state on the West Bank and Gaza Strip, whose capital is Jerusalem, without any settlers and without giving up a single inch of land and without giving up on the right of return [of Palestinian refugees].” The reconciliation brought recognisable signs of change to the streets of Gaza City hours before the signing of the pact. Palestine TV, the channel associated with Fatah and its de facto capital, Ramallah, was allowed to broadcast live from Gaza for the first time in four years. The event they televised, a demonstration in favour of the reconciliation agreement, began with a few dozen people chanting in the Square of the Unknown Soldier, and developed into a raucous party of thousands waving the yellow flags of Fatah which had been long hidden. Last week, when news of the agreement became public, activists headed to the same square to demonstrate their pleasure at the prospect of an end to division. Within minutes, they were cleared by Hamas policemen wielding batons. On Wednesday, the same policeman made no attempt to clear the crowds even when the green flags of Hamas supporters were lost in a sea of yellow Fatah flags. Rashid Mawad, a student, was waving a Fatah flag with one hand, his other still in a plaster cast following his beating at last week’s demonstration, his face still bruised. “I wasn’t optimistic last week but I feel different now,” he said. “I don’t know why, perhaps it’s because of the events in Syria,” he said. Mowayad Aish, an engineering student, was waving a Hamas flag a few metres away. “This is the first step towards ending the occupation of Palestine. It is true there have been difficulties in the past and there will be obstacles in the future but we must remember it is for the people that we want to end the division.” Hamas Palestinian territories Fatah Mahmoud Abbas Egypt Middle East Ian Black Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Donald Trump heard that President Obama “was a terrible student, terrible,” who probably pulled a fast one to sneak into the halls of ivy, but Justin Elliott over at Salon isn’t so sure the Donald should be chucking rocks inside his glass house. “Trump has allowed the media to report…
Continue reading …The fossil of an ant queen the size of a hummingbird has been found in lake sediments in Wyoming. The 2-inch-long ant is the biggest ever found in the US, and the newly identified species is one of the largest to have ever lived, reports LiveScience . Researchers say the “monstrously…
Continue reading …