They delayed their honeymoon , but not by much: Prince William and wife Kate Middleton are currently experiencing (we assume) newly wedded bliss. Palace officials today confirmed the royal couple left on their post-nuptial vacation, but would not say where, the AP reports. A spokesperson for the Seychelles tourism department confirms,…
Continue reading …The US will get its chance to grill Osama bin Laden’s three widows . Pakistani government officials have promised access in the near future, a US official tells ABC News . Meanwhile, the Daily Beast rounds up what we know so far about his three widows as well as his estranged and…
Continue reading …Wish you could have been there for the raid of Osama bin Laden’s hideout? Now you can—virtually, anyway. An independent developer has released a level for the popular first-person shooter video game “Counter-Strike: Source” that is based on photographs of the Abbottabad compound. “I can see how people would…
Continue reading …Syrian activists say it’s not safe to use their Facebook or Twitter networks anymore—because they’ve been infiltrated by the Assad regime. “Some of our people who have been taken have been broken under the most severe torture, and they have revealed passwords and names,” one activist tells the Telegraph…
Continue reading …Bleak assessment of ‘uncomfortable realities’ as poll finds European centre left lacking credibility Labour is facing a deep crisis that threatens its survival as a party of power, Ed Milibandwill be warned, on Wednesday as he is told to avoid the “politics of protest” and to focus on establishing political credibility. In a bleak description of the challenge facing Labour, one of the main authors of its general election manifesto says it will become a serious contender for power only by facing “uncomfortable realities”. Patrick Diamond, who helped write the manifesto with Miliband, makes his intervention before a conference in Oslo for European centre-left leaders, which the Labour leader will attend on Thursday and Friday. In a joint article for the Guardian’s Comment is free , written with Olaf Cramme, director of the Policy Network thinktank, which is organising the Oslo conference, Diamond writes: “Labour’s ejection from office mirrors an even starker European trend, as the pendulum has swung aggressively against the left. Local council victories last Thursday cannot disguise the governing crisis which threatens Labour’s very survival as a party of power.” Policy Network, founded by Lord Mandelson, is to publish the findings of a YouGov opinion poll that shows a public lack of confidence in the ability of the European centre-left to govern for the mainstream. The poll was conducted in the US and in Britain, Germany and Sweden – three European countries where the centre left has suffered major setbacks in recent years. It found: • A lack of faith in the ability of governments to stand up to vested interests – just 16% believed they could in the UK, 21% in Germany and 27% in Sweden. This leads to scepticism about the ability of government-led action to improve societies, with 29% in the UK and 27% in Germany questioning whether governments can be an effective force. • A strong belief among centre-right voters that centre-left governments tax too much, with not enough public benefit. Over two-thirds of Tory voters (68%) and 30% of Liberal Democrats believe this. • Pessimism about the benefits of a university degree. Scepticism is highest in Britain (79%), with the deepest reservations among the 18- to 24-year-olds (83%) and the over-60s (88%). Diamond and Cramme argue that the centre-left needs to adjust its thinking if it wants to return to government. “There is simply no substitute for hard thinking and engagement with uncomfortable realities,” they write. “This is a precondition of becoming a serious contender for power.” In a document for the Progressive Governance Conference, the thinktank warns that centre-left parties have failed to adjust to deep concerns about the scale of fiscal deficits. It says the centre-left is failing to persuade voters it can govern effectively, creating a “governing crisis” as opposed to a less serious “electoral crisis”. The Policy Network document says: “The predicament facing the European left has to be understood as a governing crisis, not merely an electoral crisis. There is little sense of a coherent ideological programme through which social democrats might govern in the future in a world transformed irrevocably by the global financial crisis. It is not simply that social democrats have failed to win elections at the national level. Rather, it is the lack of public confidence that social democrats have a clear idea of what to do with power when they win.” The document adds: “Over the last two years, the recurring question has been why, in the midst of a crisis whose origins clearly implicate the neoliberal right, it is social democrats who appear battle weary and defensive. The cause of the left’s malaise is now increasingly apparent. “The economic crisis which began with a wave of sub-prime lending in the United States has hastily been redefined as a crisis of public debt and government deficits. In other words, it is the question of the state – its size, its role, its efficiency – that has become the central issue, not the inherent instability of markets and free-market ideology.” Cramme issues a warning to Miliband, who has faced criticism among Blairites for appearing to liken the campaign against the cuts to the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa when he spoke at the TUC rally in Hyde Park. “In a period of economic hardship, it is tempting for social democratic parties to align themselves with the politics of protest,” the director of the Mandelson thinktank writes. “It is of course imperative that we prevent an economic crisis from becoming a social crisis through mass unemployment, welfare retrenchment and deep cuts in public services. The left can best do this, however, if it is in government, able to engage with hard realities and tough choices.” Labour Ed Miliband Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …More than a decade ago, Callista Bisek’s six-year affair with the married Newt Gingrich played a big part in his political downfall. Now, married for 11 years and with Newt out of office since 1999, 45-year-old Callista Gingrich could play a large role in his presidential campaign. The New York…
Continue reading …NATO missile strikes hit Tripoli today, and witnesses say some of them appeared to target Moammar Gadhafi’s compound. Libyan officials, who claim four children were wounded in the strikes, showed journalists a destroyed government building and a damaged hospital. “The direction of at least one blast suggests Gadhafi’s compound has…
Continue reading …Tom Kummer outdid his rivals with fabricated exclusives – now documentary tells how he fooled German media The Hollywood press pack just couldn’t understand it. How was a Swiss young buck persuading the world’s biggest stars to lay bare their lives while the rest of them tried to cook up something even vaguely interesting from the dull scraps they were thrown every time a celebrity had something to promote? And Tom Kummer really did scoop them all. He got Mike Tyson to pontificate on Nietzsche, discussed Kierkegaard with Sean Penn and listened to Courtney Love intellectualise her breast-baring habit and talk of how she thrived on “disillusionment … joyless sex, reincarnation”. He discovered hidden depths in Bruce Willis, who revealed a particularly bleak philosophy when he said: “I understood pretty early on that we do not advance through morality, but immorality, vices, cynicism.” In one of Kummer’s early hits, Pamela Anderson shared her thoughts on William Gibson’s Neuromancer, a radical and difficult work which has become the set text of the cyberpunk sci-fi genre. There was only one problem with Kummer’s exclusives. He had made them all up. When he was eventually caught in 2000 after delivering a particularly eye-opening interview with Christina Ricci and a rival blew the whistle, he refused to say sorry, insisting that he specialised in what he called “borderline journalism”. Now a controversial film tells the story of how Germany’s most respected publications gobbled up his inventions without ever asking to hear the tapes. The documentary, Bad Boy Kummer, has ruffled feathers in the highest echelons of the German-language media by issuing an uncomfortable reminder that some of their top names, including Ulf Poschardt, now a senior executive at the Axel Springer publishing house, happily printed Kummer’s fabrications for years. The film was made by Miklós Gimes, another of Kummer’s victims – or, to use Kummer’s preferred term, “Kummer junkies”. In the 1990s, Gimes was one of Kummer’s most faithful customers when he was deputy editor of the Tages-Anzeiger magazine, a supplement of the Swiss national newspaper. Gimes says his desire is to “crack” Kummer, to understand why someone with such literary and intellectual talents ended up passing off fiction as truth to He travels to Los Angeles, where Kummer now teaches paddle tennis, an aptly fraudulent sort of sport that uses smaller courts and less bouncy balls than the original. He watches as Kummer rummages through his archives and reads, with clear delight, from his most notorious interviews. Acting out his Tyson interview, when the disgraced boxer apparently reveals that he ate cockroaches in jail “for the protein”, he smiles with no sense of guilt. “I must say I’m impressed. I still think that it was a great interview,” he says. Britain’s GQ magazine agreed, and syndicated the article. “It wasn’t difficult to make Tom take part,” says Gimes in a voiceover. “He doesn’t want to be forgotten.” the Süddeutsche Zeitung, Die Zeit and other highbrow European publications. Many people have criticised Gimes for feeding Kummer’s desire for fame, which began in the 1980s when he was photographed by Nan Goldin in West Berlin nightclubs as a preposterously handsome youth who looked like a cross between Jean-Paul Belmondo in Breathless and Zinedine Zidane in his prime. At the Berlin premiere last week, one man angrily chastised the director for giving Kummer the oxygen of publicity. But Gimes insists it was not his intention to “heroise or rehabilitate” his subject, but to “tell a story”. He admits he paid Kummer to take part, “but just for his time – he had no creative control over the film”. In an interview with the Guardian, Kummer said the film had “nice moments” but he was disappointed that the most important of his former editors, including Poschardt, refused to take part. Poschardt, who with another Süddeutsche executive was forced to resign after Kummer’s deception was unearthed, refused to comment when contacted by the Guardian. Kummer insists he has nothing to say sorry for. “I wrote impressionistic, creative, literary descriptions of the life of stars in the form of so-called interviews. “Any professional editor, unless he or his organisation are completely incompetent, would have recognised this.” He says that in the mid-80s he saw himself as more of an artist than a common or garden journalist. “I believed that journalism can only touch part of the so-called truth, not truth itself. To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, we have art because we don’t have truth,” he said in an email interview, coming out with exactly the sort of highfalutin language he used to attribute to Kim Basinger and Zsa Zsa Gabor. Kummer insists his fake subjects played along because he made them look good. “For the last eight years I’ve played tennis with Jim Wiatt, former CEO of William Morris Agency, and he told me for example that his former clients Sharon Stone, Tom Hanks and Quentin Tarantino loved my interviews.” But why did he get away with it for so long? “Everybody loved my stuff and I guess they were addicted to some kind of illusion that stars should talk like I made them talk. “They all loved it and wanted more: readers, movie distribution people in Germany, advertisers and editors. “I was convinced that the editors knew everything – nobody asked for tapes, nobody asked for any kind of proof for more than six years – but they refused to admit it. I was playing the violin for them.” Other journalistic frauds Jayson Blair New York Times rising star Jayson Blair resigned from the paper in 2003 after admitting plagiarism and fraud. He faked the datelines on his stories, claiming to be in various far-flung corners of the US when really he was sitting at home in front of his laptop. When his deception was uncovered, the NYT ran a 7,239-word front-page mea culpa, which called the affair “a low point in the 152-year history of the newspaper”. Stephen Glass While a cub reporter working for the American magazine New Republic in the 90s, Stephen Glass fabricated quotations, sources, and even entire events in articles. His fall from grace was detailed in the Hollywood film Shattered Glass. Janet Cooke In 1980, Washington Post writer Janet Cooke had to return her Pulitzer prize after she was found to have faked a much-praised interview with an eight-year-old heroin addict. Documentary Germany Europe Helen Pidd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …US military officers are drawing up plans for a modest troop reduction in Afghanistan that’s designed to meet President Obama’s July deadline without conceding the ground they’ve gained in the restive south. Preliminary plans call for the withdrawal of 5,000 troops in July, and another 5,000 by December—…
Continue reading …