Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1481)
Ugandan parliament drops bill that would jail gay people for life

Legislation first put forward in 2009 removed from MPs’ timetable amid worldwide outcry A bill calling for gay people to be imprisoned for life has been dropped by the Ugandan parliament after worldwide condemnation. The fiercely controversial legislation, first put forward in 2009 , was discussed in committee on Friday. It was due to be debated on Wednesday but was removed from the MPs’ timetable. With the current parliament about to be dissolved, the bill appears to have been put on hold indefinitely – but campaigners warned it could be reintroduced in the next session. John Alimadi, an MP, told the Associated Press the bill may have been dropped from the agenda because of the worldwide outcry against it. Campaigners welcomed the development. Christopher Seneno, a Ugandan bishop, said: “It’s good news. We wouldn’t like this bill even to be debated. That will be dangerous because there is a lot of misinformation and excitement. Just with the bill being debated, anything can happen to LGBT people.” Seneno admitted he did not know whether the bill was dead in the water or could be revived at a later date. Ricken Patel, the executive director of Avaaz, an online group that attracted more than 1 million signatories condemning the legislation, said: “The pressure on the Ugandan government has had a big impact today, with President Museveni keeping the bill off the table – as he has for months. “If not tabled this week the bill will die for good – a huge victory for human rights.” Gay activists say homophobia in Uganda has increased since the bill’s introduction. More gay people are being harassed because of media attention and because church leaders have been preaching in favour of the bill going through parliament. Authored by the MP David Bahati, the bill carries harsh provisions. Anyone convicted of a homosexual act would face life imprisonment. Anyone who “aids, abets, counsels or procures another to engage of acts of homosexuality” would face seven years in prison. Landlords renting rooms or homes to homosexual people could get seven years. Bahati’s original bill mandated a death sentence for active homosexual people living with HIV or in cases of same-sex rape, but he said last month this was “something we have moved away from”. Politicians and civil rights groups around the world have criticised the bill, with Barack Obama describing it as “odious”. Gay rights Uganda Africa David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ugandan parliament drops bill that would jail gay people for life

Legislation first put forward in 2009 removed from MPs’ timetable amid worldwide outcry A bill calling for gay people to be imprisoned for life has been dropped by the Ugandan parliament after worldwide condemnation. The fiercely controversial legislation, first put forward in 2009 , was discussed in committee on Friday. It was due to be debated on Wednesday but was removed from the MPs’ timetable. With the current parliament about to be dissolved, the bill appears to have been put on hold indefinitely – but campaigners warned it could be reintroduced in the next session. John Alimadi, an MP, told the Associated Press the bill may have been dropped from the agenda because of the worldwide outcry against it. Campaigners welcomed the development. Christopher Seneno, a Ugandan bishop, said: “It’s good news. We wouldn’t like this bill even to be debated. That will be dangerous because there is a lot of misinformation and excitement. Just with the bill being debated, anything can happen to LGBT people.” Seneno admitted he did not know whether the bill was dead in the water or could be revived at a later date. Ricken Patel, the executive director of Avaaz, an online group that attracted more than 1 million signatories condemning the legislation, said: “The pressure on the Ugandan government has had a big impact today, with President Museveni keeping the bill off the table – as he has for months. “If not tabled this week the bill will die for good – a huge victory for human rights.” Gay activists say homophobia in Uganda has increased since the bill’s introduction. More gay people are being harassed because of media attention and because church leaders have been preaching in favour of the bill going through parliament. Authored by the MP David Bahati, the bill carries harsh provisions. Anyone convicted of a homosexual act would face life imprisonment. Anyone who “aids, abets, counsels or procures another to engage of acts of homosexuality” would face seven years in prison. Landlords renting rooms or homes to homosexual people could get seven years. Bahati’s original bill mandated a death sentence for active homosexual people living with HIV or in cases of same-sex rape, but he said last month this was “something we have moved away from”. Politicians and civil rights groups around the world have criticised the bill, with Barack Obama describing it as “odious”. Gay rights Uganda Africa David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
NHS reforms: David Cameron rejects claim that ‘listening exercise’ is a sham

Cameron promises ‘significant and substantial changes’ to health and social care bill as Ed Miliband accuses him of ‘dumping on’ health secretary Andrew Lansley David Cameron has promised “significant and substantial changes” to the government’s plans to reform the health service amid accusations that ministers are conducting a “sham” consultation exercise. The prime minister became embroiled in a row with the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, at prime minister’s questions over treatment waiting times and plans by the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, to revamp the National Health Service, which have sparked widespread opposition from staff. The two leaders traded insults as Miliband ramped up the pressure on Cameron by linking him personally with the NHS reform plans. The Labour leader read out a quote from Cameron last month, in which he claimed he had been involved in designing the reforms “way back into opposition with Andrew Lansley”. “Can he therefore confirm that the NHS plans are not Andrew Lansley’s fault; they’re his?” asked Miliband, before accusing him of “dumping” on a minister rather than taking responsibility himself – a practice Miliband claimed was “becoming a pattern”. “This morning in the papers we see the universities minister [David Willetts] being dumped on for his tuition fees policy, we see the schools secretary [Michael Gove] being dumped on for his free schools policy and the poor deputy prime minister [Nick Clegg], he just gets dumped on every day of the week.” He said the decision to throw open a “listening exercise” last month, with the legislation for the reforms already making its passage through parliament, was proof that Cameron thought “something has gone wrong”. But he went on to claim that the exercise was “nothing more than a sham” in light of the fact that the NHS chief executive, Sir David Nicholson, had told health managers to carry on implementing the reforms after the “so called pause” in the legislation had begun. Cameron insisted the government was determined to get the reforms “right”. “I can absolutely guarantee there will be significant and substantial changes to the reforms because we want to get them right, because we want to guarantee an NHS, free at the point of use, available on need rather than ability to pay and unlike the party opposite, which is cutting the NHS in Wales, this government will put more money in the NHS.” The prime minister cited a letter signed by 42 GPs that hailed Lansley’s health reforms as “good for patients”. The letter, published today in the Daily Telegraph called on the government to press ahead with the health and social care bill. The 42 signatories, all family doctors, who together lead 1,100 practices across England and who are all heads of recently-formed GPs’ consortiums, said that ditching the reforms would be a mistake. They insisted the reforms would benefit the most elderly, infirm and vulnerable people in society. But it emerged almost three weeks ago that Jonathan Munday, a former Tory councillor who chairs the board of the Victoria Commissioning Consortium, had emailed GP colleagues urging them to back his reforms by signing the letter of support to the prime minister that went out today. Miliband told Cameron he should be “embarrassed” by the assessment by the Royal College of General Practitioners, which represented thousands of GPs, and has warned that the government’s plans would cause “irreparable damage to the core values of the NHS”. The prime minister challenged Miliband to deal “with the substance of the reform” since he agreed that “no change is not an option”. “He should be seriously engaging in how we make sure we have a strong NHS for all our people in the future. Instead we have an empty opposition, which got him nowhere last week.” Miliband used his first question to ask Cameron to rate his handling of the NHS after a year in office before pointing to figures published today which show waiting times for diagnosis have risen : “Over 10,000 people waiting to get their tests, that’s three times the number it was a year ago.” Cameron instead seized on a previous claim Miliband made two weeks ago about rising waiting times for inpatients and outpatients, which the prime minister said had turned out to be wrong, and told the Labour leader he should have the “guts” to admit he had been wrong. But the Labour leader insisted “waiting times are rising” and said Cameron had refused to take responsibility for the NHS reforms. The NHS surfaced again later in prime minister’s question as Cameron told MPs that the government would consider terminating its contract with a private firm to overhaul the NHS’s computer system. He faced calls from Richard Bacon, the Conservative MP for South Norfolk, to scrap the new system and save a further £4.7bn, which he said could be better spent directly on patients. The NHS computer programme would “never deliver its early promise”, he added. Cameron said the IT systems inherited from Labour were “poor value for money”, with the £12bn centralised records system for 50 million patients in England taking four years longer than planned to implement. He told the Commons: “Since coming into government we have reviewed the projects with the intention of making the best of what we have inherited. “In part, as a result of our work, the government has cut £1.3bn from the cost of the National Programme for IT in the NHS, including planned savings of at least £500m from Computer Sciences Corporation.” He added: “There are no plans to sign any new contract with Computer Sciences Corporation until the National Audit Office report has been reviewed and until the public accounts committee meetings and the Major Projects Authority reviews have taken place. “The Department of Health and Cabinet Office will examine all the available options under the current contract, including the option of terminating some or all of the contracts.” NHS Health PMQs House of Commons David Cameron Ed Miliband Health policy Public services policy Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Barry George could be compensated after supreme court ruling

Britian’s top judges rule that Northern Irish pair who suffered miscarriage of justice are entitled to compensation Two men from Northern Ireland whose convictions for murder during the Troubles were quashed following the emergence of fresh evidence are entitled to compensation, the supreme court has ruled. In a new definition of what constitutes a miscarriage of justice Britain’s most senior judges said that Raymond McCartney and Eamonn MacDermott were entitled to compensation. The two men were convicted in January 1979 of murder and membership of the IRA but had their convictions quashed in February 2007. Millions of pounds could be paid to scores of other victims from Northern Ireland as a result of the decision. The court rejected a similar challenge by Andrew Adams, a former aircraft engineer, of Newcastle upon Tyne, who spent 14 years in jail before his murder conviction was ruled unsafe. Barry George, whose conviction for the murder of the TV presenter Jill Dando was quashed, has been fighting for years for compensation; he also joined the case. Nick Baird, solicitor for George, said after the judgment that he was encouraged and would be applying for the Ministry of Justice asking them to reconsider their refusal to give him compensation. The nine supreme court judges ruled that in George’s case where a ‘”new or newly discovered fact” had emerged which led to an acquittal at retrial “compensation should be paid to him under the scheme that had been set up by the statute”. By a narrow majority, the judges held that a miscarriage of justice had occurred “when a new or newly discovered fact shows conclusively that the evidence against a defendant has been so undermined that no conviction could possibly be based upon it”. The supreme court panel said: “A claimant for compensation will not need to prove that he was innocent of the crime but he will have to show that, on the basis of the facts as they are now known, he should not have been convicted or that conviction could not possibly be based on those facts.” Not all miscarriages of justice will lead to compensation. “Procedural deficiencies that led to irregularities in the trial or errors in the investigation of offences will not suffice to establish entitlement to compensation,” the judges ruled. McCartney, a Sinn Féin assembly member for Foyle, said his decision to pursue the case had been justified. “I feel totally vindicated,” he said. “This has been a long process and I want to pay due gratitude to my legal team who have been magnificent throughout this. The supreme court has allowed us to pursue compensation … [The] former lord chief justice (of Northern Ireland) Brian Kerr has stated in the course of the judgment that not only should we have been acquitted but shouldn’t have faced trial in the first place. ” This is damning indictment of the RUC’s (Royal Ulster Constabulary) interrogation techniques at the time and a damning indictment of the actions of the Public Prosecution Service at the time.” Adams said: “I welcome the fact that the majority of the supreme court has not agreed with the justice secretary’s proposal to solely compensate those people who he decides have been completely exonerated of the crime they were wrongly convicted of. “But I am bitterly disappointed that … [my case has not been] accepted for compensation within the new definition. I maintain my innocence of the murder of Jack Royal – as I have from day one.” Since 2006 the Ministry of Justice has awarded compensation to 59 applicants out of 228, according to figures given to the court. UK criminal justice UK supreme court Northern Ireland Jill Dando murder Crime IRA UK security and terrorism Owen Bowcott Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Thousands of Romans unsettled by rumors of an impending earthquake have decided that today is a good day to get out of Rome. A rumor that has spread widely online holds that seismologist Raffaele Bendandi—who died in 1979—predicted that a devastating earthquake would hit Rome on May 11,…

Continue reading …
Careless driving crackdown ‘will be ignored by motorists’

RAC say because there aren’t enough police on the road, 2003 ban on using phones while driving has been flouted by drivers Motoring organisations have warned that a crackdown on careless driving including £100 fines for offences such as tailgating and weaving through traffic could be flouted by reckless car owners due to a lack of roadside police officers. The RAC said a ban on using mobile phones while driving, introduced in 2003, is ignored by motorists who believe there are not enough police on the roads to enforce it – raising fears that the same will happen to the latest changes. In a move timed to coincide with the launch of the United Nations Decade of Action for Road Safety, the government announced that careless drivers would be handed fixed penalty notices of between £80 and £100 plus a three-point penalty on their licences, or sent on retraining courses in order to avoid “kneejerk” punishment of inadvertent mistakes. Under the current regimes, all careless driving cases have to go to court and as a consequence convictions have plummeted over the past two decades. Adrian Tink, the RAC’s motoring strategist, said: “Will it be any different to the mobile phone laws that are flouted every day by people who simply don’t believe they’ll get caught? Without high profile enforcement it will likely remain just a good idea on paper.” Edmund King, president of the AA, said reductions in traffic police numbers over the decade had already given an advantage to bad drivers. “Enforcement will be a real issue because in the last decade there has been a reduction in dedicated traffic officers of about 1,500 people and police budgets across the country are being cut by about 20%. So it will be difficult for extra enforcement to be carried out by the police.” The transport secretary, Philip Hammond, said the changes would free up police resources by allowing officers to focus more on serious driving offences, because it is hoped that careless driving will now be tackled more effectively. “I believe that focusing police resources on the most dangerous group of drivers will make a difference to road safety outcomes.” In 2009 2,222 people were killed on UK roads, a fall of 12% on the previous year. Currently, police are dissuaded from taking action on careless driving because it is a time-consuming process. He added that allocating officers to enforcing the new rules would be down to local chief constables and could be deferred ultimately to elected police and crime commissioners. King said people were more likely to divert police resources to more high-profile crimes. “If you have got a public that is concerned about violent crime or aggressive burglaries those crimes will always be prioritised over tailgating on adjacent motorways.” Nonetheless, King said the proposals contained welcome elements including a commitment to re-educate rather than punish drivers who commited errors but were not reckless. Maria Eagle, the shadow transport secretary, said spending cuts posed a greater threat to road safety. Labour claims that 12,500 police officer posts will go in England and Wales over the next four years, while road safety funding has been cut by 40%. “The Tory-led government’s reckless decision to axe road safety funding, cut the frontline police officers needed to enforce traffic offences and abandon targets risks more deaths and injuries on Britain’s roads,” she said. However, Hammond’s announcement was welcomed by senior officers who said officers struggled to find the time in courts to prosecute careless driving offences. Additional measures in the new road safety strategy include retests for disqualified offenders before they regain their licence, an end to the right to request blood tests rather than breath tests for drink-driving, seizures of vehicles belonging to the most dangerous offenders, a post-test qualification for new drivers to encourage lower insurance premiums and the offer of educational courses instead of points on a licence for minor offences. Other elements will revolve around a new crackdown on driving while under the influence of drugs, an increase in the range of educational courses for lower level offence and the abolition of loopholes that allow drink drivers to get off without charge. The current Pass Plus scheme for novice drivers will also be replaced with a new qualification – including an assessment – in an attempt to encourage insurers to lower premiums. Road transport Transport policy Transport Dan Milmo Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Al-Qaida leader warns of ‘worse to come’ in eulogy to Bin Laden

‘What you will be facing is more intense harmful’ says head of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula The leader of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) has vowed to fight on after the killing of Osama bin Laden saying “what is coming is greater and worse” in a statement posted on the internet. “You have to fight one generation after the other, until your life is ruined, your days are disturbed and you face disgrace. The fight between us and you was not led by Osama alone,” said Nasser al-Wuhayshi, addressing al-Qaida’s enemies. “What is coming is greater and worse, and what you will be facing is more intense and harmful,” said Wuhayshi in a eulogy to Bin Laden posted on the Islamist militant website As-Ansar . Yemen-based AQAP is seen as one of al-Qaida’s most aggressive regional wings. It has staged several foiled strikes on US and Saudi targets. US forces killed Bin Laden in a raid on his hideout in Pakistan last week, nearly 10 years after the 9/11 attacks. Wuhayshi, another top target for US forces, was a close personal aide to Bin Laden in Afghanistan in the 1990s, and he stuck closely to the leader’s ideology and operational tactics. He wrote: “The Americans killed the sheikh but have they killed the faith of the sheikh, his methodology and his call, and the combat morale of the ummah the sheikh has revived?” Analysts have said AQAP may organise revenge attacks for Bin Laden’s death. AQAP has claimed responsibility for a foiled 2009 attempt to blow up a Detroit-bound plane. It was also blamed for bombs found in cargo en route to the United States in 2010. “Tell the Americans that the ember of jihad is glowing stronger and brighter than it was during the life of the Sheikh,” Wuhayshi said. Impoverished Yemen has been rocked by nearly three months of protests against President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s 32-year rule. Washington and Gulf states including Saudi Arabia are eager to negotiate a power transfer deal because if the country collapses it could give AQAP more room to operate. On Saturday a Yemeni tribal source said that Anwar al-Awlaki, a prominent US-born al-Qaida activist known for encouraging attacks on the United States, was not hit by a US drone attack that killed two middle-ranking al-Qaida leaders in Yemen last week. al-Qaida Global terrorism Osama bin Laden Yemen Middle East guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Hardest Hit: Disabled people march in London – live coverage

Live coverage from the capital as an expected 5,000-10,000 disabled people protest on the Hardest Hit march against cuts to benefits and services 3.01pm: Karen McVeigh is now at the Methodist Central Hall with some of the protesters who are waiting to meet their MPs (others are meeting theirs in Westminster Hall). The organisers of the march are putting the number of protesters at 5,000, while the police are estimating 2,000-3,000. The organisers say some 2,000 people signed up to meet their MPs today, but not all of these have been able to make it. 2.37pm: The Press Association news agency has just filed a report on the march. PA says there were “thousands” of demonstrators, some in wheelchairs and some with guide dogs. The news agency notes: A series of protests are being held this week against the new work capability assessments which campaigners say have seen thousands of people, some with serious health conditions, denied benefits. PA says some of the marchers chanted: “We need support, we need care, don’t take away our welfare”, and carried placards saying: “Leave DLA [disability living allowance] alone; it’s already hard to be ill.” Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, told the marchers: Tell people what it means to cut 20% off the benefits for disabled people and find out how to do it later, and to make disabled people prisoners in their own homes. These changes are cruel and they must change. We have been tabling amendment after amendment that shows this government how they can do things differently, and day after day they have joined forces to defeat us. With passion, conviction and determination we can change this bill for the better, and give people in this country their rights to a full and independent life. Jane Asher, the actress and activist, told the rally: This is the largest rally of disabled people in living memory, and that’s something to be proud of; at the same time, it is very sad that it has come to this. The prime minister said that the savings would protect the vulnerable. Far from protecting the vulnerable, these cuts are bearing down disproportionately on those with disability. People with disability are being hit from all sides. I am calling on the government, with all of you, to put a stop to these cuts; they are cruel, they are misguided, and they are badly drafted. 2.28pm: The BBC News channel is covering the march now. “Already we are seeing many disabled people who are ending up back in institutional care,” one marcher, in a wheelchair, told the channel. Maria Miller (left), the minister for the disabled, was interviewed, and said it was not right that the UK had a benefits system where there are more alcoholics and drug addicts in receipt of disability living allowance than the blind. 2.20pm: Karen McVeigh has been speaking to actor Julie Fernandez (left), best-known for playing Brenda in The Office. She said it was difficult for disabled people to find work as they were discriminated against. She said: The government want to get people into employment in principle but we are living in a recession and the business community don’t see disabled people as viable employees. They see us as people who are going to be taking time off sick or who aren’t intelligent enough. The government are bashing disabled people over the head with these changes to benefits but they should be making the business community employ disabled people. They should stop penalising disable people and start making the business community and public transport more accessible. Fernandez, 37, from Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, said the film and TV industry was “incredibly discriminatory” as it was still seen as acceptable to have able-bodied actors playing disabled characters. She is setting up her own business, a craft shop, to bring in a second income, and said that she was able to claim access to work benefit, which enables her to employ a PA and driver, Lynsey Walton. Fernandez said: Lynsey is my body. If I didn’t have Lynsey I wouldn’t be able to work. By getting the benefit, I’m a taxpayer and Lynsey is a tax payer. There are millions of people across the UK with permanent disabilities. They need to be supported they don’t need to be living in fear of having their benefits taken away. 2.16pm: Here’s a picture of Sally Bercow, the wife of the Speaker of the Commons, and Jane Asher, the actress and activist, on the march today: _ 2.02pm: The Public and Commercial Services union has sent me an email about the march. Members of the PCS joined the protesters, and the union focused on planned cuts to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which covers discrimination based on disability. Employees walked out for one hour today in protest. A PCS spokesman said: This financial mess was created by bankers and to make the vulnerable pay for a crisis they did not cause the government is cutting lifelines like the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s helpline and slashing the independent living allowance, disability living allowance and employment support allowance … [This] will mean disabled people will be forced to retreat back into their homes, and become entrenched in poverty … The government has received a powerful message from today’s marchers that people are prepared to stand up in defence of benefits and services for the most vulnerable people. 1.54pm: Labour activist Stewart Owadally paints a vivid picture of the march : _ 1.30pm: Karen McVeigh has been talking to more marchers. Mary Carr, 46, a public sector worker from Nottingham who has mental health issues, was carrying a black coffin with the words “disability equality” written on the side. Despite having a fear of crowds she was keen to protest against the government, which she said was “demonising disabled people”. Carr said: “I’m fortunate in that I can hold down a job. I have access to work support and the government pays for taxis to take me to work. They haven’t cut that but the warning signs are there. A lot of my disabled colleagues have lost their jobs because in public services they are targeting local offices and disabled people can’t travel to get to other places. We signed up to the European convention for people with disabilities but if you go through the effects of the cuts – transport, education, housing, all the rights I have to take part in society are being eroded. It’s the poor and disabled who are more reliant on the public sector.” 1.12pm: On Twitter, hotcrossbunny sums up how many demonstrators and commenters below the line here seem to be feeling about the lack of media coverage of the march. _ 1.07pm: Karen McVeigh sends more from the march: Aileen Feasey, 52, from near Bodmin, Cornwall, came to London with her sons Andrew, 24, and Alastair, 19, on the overnight sleeper last night. Feasey said that she is marching for the rights of people like Andrew, who has down’s syndrome, to lead an independent life. Since 2009 he has one day a week in a work placement scheme as a general assistant in a leisure centre 15 miles away. But last month, she was told that his transport costs would no longer be paid by the council. He is now unable to go. Feasey said: “All we’ve fought for all Andrew’s life is going backwards. Without transport he is a prisoner in his own home. He doesn’t understand why he can’t go. He gets his leisure centre T-shirt on on Mondays and it’s very difficult to explain to him. We live in Cornwall; it’s a 40 mile round trip anywhere.” Andrew used to get £55 mobility allowance, which is being cut. “He used to go to the theatre group, college a couple of days a week. But he’s unable to contribute to his transport costs. It’s unfair and it feels unlawful to charge his benefits against transport.” Feasey, who is self-employed, was planning to go to university, but does not know if she now can. “I’ve cared for him for 24 years, to be an independent young man. But our lives have been turned upside down by this cut.” 1.02pm: Karen McVeigh has just called with news of the speakers at the march. Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, who handed the government its “no money left” line when he left office, said he thought it was more important to be out with the marchers than listening to David Cameron at prime minister’s questions. Mark Harrison, the chief executive of the Coalition of Disabled People, commenting on the absence of Maria Miller, the minister for disabled people, called for a vote of no confidence in her and said she was now “the minister against disabled people”. “All those in favour … ” he said, prompting a big cheer from the demonstrators. “All those against … ” Silence. “That’s unanimous,” Harrison concluded. 12.52pm: The march is on, Lucy Glennon reports: “A bus full of tourists on a tour are cheering us on as we move along. Hopefully they understand the purpose of the march. Hope people in parliament can hear us and will make an effort to see us; many are struggling to walk.” 12.43pm: Margaret Curran, the shadow disabled minister , has tweeted that she is on the march and calls it a “unanimous vote of no confidence” for her opposite number in the government: _ 12.31pm: Lucy Glennon , one of the marchers ( see 9.37am ), sends this update: Thousands here already. So many different people with many different conditions. A lot more assistance dogs than I anticipated. Users of motorised wheelchairs and scooters are politely letting one another through like organised traffic. People feel quite passionate already. The marchers from Mind have clappers. Great atmosphere already. Would recommend people come down now if they still want to. 12.20pm: My colleagues on the video desk have produced this film of disabled people campaigning at the headquarters of Atos Origin, the company employed by the government to assess whether or not they are fit to work. _ 12.16pm: Over on the NHS live blog , my colleagues Randeep Ramesh and Rowenna Davis are hosting a web chat from 1pm-2pm with the CEO of the MS Society, Simon Gillespie, and members of Acevo and the Stroke Association answering your questions live. At 4-5pm, a panel of patients and carers for people with long-term and chronic conditions will be discussing how the health reforms might affect them. 12.11pm: My colleague Karen McVeigh has just phoned from the march, where she has been speaking to demonstrators. At Victoria Embankment Richard Hawkes, chief executive of Scope, said that he hoped the march would give disabled people a sense that they are not alone. “Above all it’s really important for the people here today to have a sense of coming together, that there are a lot of people who are interested in the rights of disabled people,” he said. “That is one of the most powerful things for them. There is an unfortunate narrative, a myth that has been perpetuated by certain tabloid newspapers, that there are a lot of benefit scroungers. The government’s own statistics show that less than 2% of people who claim incapacity benefit do so fraudulently. Our experience is that most disabled people want to work. But they need support to do so, to overcome transport issues and other issues related to disability. “There is a combined impact of the reform of the disability living allowance, DLA, the test for incapacity benefit, the removal of the mobility component of DLA for those in residential care, and cuts to local authority support services that have had a huge impact on disabled people. That has led to a lot of disabled people being hugely concerned and hugely worried. We know there’s a deficit but the government has said we’re in it together. Taking away the DLA mobility allowance for people in residential care, which means that they can’t go out, is not a sign that we are in it together.” Sheila Gardiner, 62, from Derbyshire, worked as a bookkeeper until she had a stroke five years ago. She is now unable to walk or transfer from her wheelchair unaided, and lives in a Leonard Cheshire Disability care home. She currently gets £49.85 DLA support each week, which is under threat. “They want to take away my DLA mobility. If they do, I won’t be able to see my daughter Serene graduate from acting school in London. I go to college – I already have an A-level in computing – but I won’t be able to do that either. I have to travel by train or taxi as I can’t transfer from my wheelchair. This is going backwards towards Victorian times when people were either very rich or very poor.” Tony Vanterpool, 53, from Brampton in Cambridgeshire, has been deaf since birth, but had a stroke 11 years ago which left him in a wheelchair and unable to properly use sign language. On his lap was a “lightwriter”, a small typewriter which prints what he is saying. He is helped 10 hours a week by a communication support worker, Jan Smith, who was with him today. Vanterpool said: “I came to campaign with all the disabled people because the government are cutting my mobility allowance. I nee this to go to the deaf club.” Smith explained that where Vanterpool lives in a care home there are no other deaf people, the staff do not sign, and he is unable to speak in sign language. Vanterpool said: “I like going to deaf club. I meet friends there.” Going to the deaf club once a month, which is his only link to similar people, costs £17 round trip, which is paid for by the mobility allowance of the DLA. 11.28am: The Broken of Britain has also posted this video to mark the march, entitled We have a Dream. Despite the crippling debt of the post war years, our grandfathers and grandmothers made sure their dream of a society caring for all was a priority … We refuse to accept a system bailed out by the taxpayer is so bankrupt it can no longer meet it’s obligations to the basic welfare of all people. We refuse to believe in a world which bankers choose to increase bonuses whilst disabled people choose between food and heat. We refuse to believe local authorities deem it right and proper to save money by leaving old ladies overnight in their own urine, we refuse to believe that removing respite care can be right. We refuse to believe that we should be blamed, targeted, made less human by those who sip from the cup of success. _ 11.15am: Yesterday the blog The Broken of Britain addressed the argument that “there is no money left” and so benefits must be cut: There is a lot of money left. The UK is one of the richest nations in the OECD, and the financial crisis has not changed that – it is only that the super-rich … have moved this money where it does not benefit the nation at large. Fourthly, even if there were no money left, we should borrow sensibly – cutting public expenditure dramatically at this time will serve only to reverse economic growth, widening the fiscal deficit. 10.27am: Asked about the march, a spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said the government’s “commitment to support disabled people to live independent lives will not change”. Every disabled person will still get support, but the benefits system is not working. It’s trapped people on benefits. We want to give people the support to get into the workplace, and that’s what our reforms are all about. We have a raft of support available to do this. We want to reassure people that that won’t change. In a statement, the DWP added: We are reforming welfare to make sure that the billions we spend on benefits goes to those who need it and that for the first time disabled people get proper help and support to live independent lives and work in the mainstream jobs that they want. 10.10am: Amelia Gentleman has been speaking to marchers: Pepe Martinez, 58, arrived by train from Huntingdon, where he’s a resident at a Leonard Cheshire home, hoping that the protest might help persuade the government to rethink its plan to cut disability allowance payments. He’s a Tory voter and hadn’t expected disability benefits to be affected when he voted for the party last year. A former nurse, who spent 35 years caring for others in the NHS, he has been surprised by attitudes towards disabled people since developing a degenerative condition 10 years ago. “I thought we were lucky in Britain; I thought this was a caring nation. Now I don’t think that,” he says. Without the mobility component of DLA, which the government plans to cut, he “won’t be able to be a part of life generally”. He worries he’ll be stuck inside the care home unable to visit friends and family outside. “We’ll be like zombies,” he says. I met Billie Smith, a carer with Leonard Cheshire disability, at King’s Cross station coming in with a small group of demonstrators just after 9am. She has spent the past month making arrangements to help five of the 20 residents at the Manor home in Cambridgeshire get to London for the march. The process has illustrated the enormous difficulties facing disabled people when they use public transport. Since only two wheelchairs are allowed on each First Direct train she had to book residents and carers on three separate trains. She had to give the rail company 24 hours notice of their intention to travel. Arrangements have sucked up most of her time for the past week. But she’s been happy to do it because she also wants to register her protest at today’s march. After 20 years working for the charity, trying to improve conditions, she’s worried that things are taking a step backwards. “If they cut DLA there’s a chance people will become institutionalised again,” she says, shouting over the noise of commuters arriving for work. 9.37am: Good morning. Between 5,000 and 10,000 disabled people are expected to march in London today in a rally against cuts to benefits and services. The Hardest Hit march, organised jointly by the UK Disabled People’s Council and the Disability Benefits Consortium, is expected to be the largest event of its kind for decades. The protesters are voicing their anger at the combined effects of changes to welfare eligibility, cuts to disability living allowance and reductions in council funding for carers and services. In a comment piece in today’s Guardian, Sue Marsh, who blogs at Diary of a Benefit Scrounger , explains more : Sick and disabled people will lose £9bn in vital support over the lifetime of this parliament. That’s a colossal 10% of George Osborne’s entire £89bn deficit reduction plan. Some studies have found that it will cost the disabled a full third of our incomes. Incapacity benefit is being phased out and the much tougher employment support allowance (ESA) is disqualifying 93% of claimants from long-term support. Disability living allowance is being scrapped and replaced with “personal independent payments”, which will disqualify a further 20% of the most severely disabled. In another comment piece, Alice Maynard , the chair of disability charity Scope, adds: The simple fact is that daily life costs more if you are disabled, which means disabled people and their families are more vulnerable to the impact of losing a local service, a wage freeze or seeing their benefits adjusted. Marchers will be addressed by Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary. Maria Miller, minister for disabled people, declined an invitation to attend, on the grounds that she needed to be at prime minister’s questions, according to Jaspal Dhani, chief executive of the United Kingdom Disabled People’s Council. My colleagues Amelia Gentleman and Karen McVeigh are with the march and we’ll be hearing from them shortly, and my colleagues from the video desk will be sending footage as soon as possible. Amelia wrote a story about the march in today’s Guardian, which you can read here . Lucy Glennon, who has the rare skin condition epidermolysis bullosa, explained why she was marching today, and we’ll be hearing more from her throughout the day: I’m joining the march today in the hope that it will raise awareness on the cuts and changes to welfare and benefits and how they will significantly impact disabled people. While I understand everyone has to accept some change to their life in order for the country to save money, it is not really appreciated how much more disabled people are going to feel the bite of the cuts, and many are already adapting to changes with difficulty. I have a painful condition, epidermolysis bullosa, and today I am taking part in the march being pushed in my wheelchair by Cynthia Richards, one of the social care managers for DEBRA , the charity that helps people with my condition and works to find a cure. With regard to people with EB, we believe it is wrong that those who are completely unable to walk, including children, could be ticked as being fine to ‘mobilise’ under the proposed changes to Disability Living Allowance, which is being replaced with a much more unfair system of assessment for Personal Independent Payment. It is also wrong that the new assessment for Employment Support Allowance does not give much consideration to pain experienced when doing tasks or walking, when some people with EB are unable to walk without strong opiates, as walking often creates sores and wounds on their feet. It is also unfair that some people with EB have already been told by their local councils not to request more care, no matter how much they need it, as it would put their existing care package under assessment and could result in it stopping completely. Here’s a rough schedule for today : 11.30am onwards: Campaigners gather on Victoria Embankment by Horseguards Avenue. 12-12.30pm: Rally on Victoria Embankment. Speakers include disabled people, MPs and Jane Asher. 12.30pm-1.30pm: March – from Victoria Embankment, along Parliament Square and Millbank, finishing at Dean Stanley Street. 1.30pm-5.30pm: Campaigners meeting their MPs in Westminster Hall. The actress Jane Asher is president of three disability organisations involved in the march: Arthritis Care, National Autistic Society and Parkinson’s UK. You can find the website for the march here . Disability London Protest Welfare Public sector cuts Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Hardest Hit: Disabled people march in London – live coverage

Live coverage from the capital as an expected 5,000-10,000 disabled people protest on the Hardest Hit march against cuts to benefits and services 3.01pm: Karen McVeigh is now at the Methodist Central Hall with some of the protesters who are waiting to meet their MPs (others are meeting theirs in Westminster Hall). The organisers of the march are putting the number of protesters at 5,000, while the police are estimating 2,000-3,000. The organisers say some 2,000 people signed up to meet their MPs today, but not all of these have been able to make it. 2.37pm: The Press Association news agency has just filed a report on the march. PA says there were “thousands” of demonstrators, some in wheelchairs and some with guide dogs. The news agency notes: A series of protests are being held this week against the new work capability assessments which campaigners say have seen thousands of people, some with serious health conditions, denied benefits. PA says some of the marchers chanted: “We need support, we need care, don’t take away our welfare”, and carried placards saying: “Leave DLA [disability living allowance] alone; it’s already hard to be ill.” Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, told the marchers: Tell people what it means to cut 20% off the benefits for disabled people and find out how to do it later, and to make disabled people prisoners in their own homes. These changes are cruel and they must change. We have been tabling amendment after amendment that shows this government how they can do things differently, and day after day they have joined forces to defeat us. With passion, conviction and determination we can change this bill for the better, and give people in this country their rights to a full and independent life. Jane Asher, the actress and activist, told the rally: This is the largest rally of disabled people in living memory, and that’s something to be proud of; at the same time, it is very sad that it has come to this. The prime minister said that the savings would protect the vulnerable. Far from protecting the vulnerable, these cuts are bearing down disproportionately on those with disability. People with disability are being hit from all sides. I am calling on the government, with all of you, to put a stop to these cuts; they are cruel, they are misguided, and they are badly drafted. 2.28pm: The BBC News channel is covering the march now. “Already we are seeing many disabled people who are ending up back in institutional care,” one marcher, in a wheelchair, told the channel. Maria Miller (left), the minister for the disabled, was interviewed, and said it was not right that the UK had a benefits system where there are more alcoholics and drug addicts in receipt of disability living allowance than the blind. 2.20pm: Karen McVeigh has been speaking to actor Julie Fernandez (left), best-known for playing Brenda in The Office. She said it was difficult for disabled people to find work as they were discriminated against. She said: The government want to get people into employment in principle but we are living in a recession and the business community don’t see disabled people as viable employees. They see us as people who are going to be taking time off sick or who aren’t intelligent enough. The government are bashing disabled people over the head with these changes to benefits but they should be making the business community employ disabled people. They should stop penalising disable people and start making the business community and public transport more accessible. Fernandez, 37, from Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, said the film and TV industry was “incredibly discriminatory” as it was still seen as acceptable to have able-bodied actors playing disabled characters. She is setting up her own business, a craft shop, to bring in a second income, and said that she was able to claim access to work benefit, which enables her to employ a PA and driver, Lynsey Walton. Fernandez said: Lynsey is my body. If I didn’t have Lynsey I wouldn’t be able to work. By getting the benefit, I’m a taxpayer and Lynsey is a tax payer. There are millions of people across the UK with permanent disabilities. They need to be supported they don’t need to be living in fear of having their benefits taken away. 2.16pm: Here’s a picture of Sally Bercow, the wife of the Speaker of the Commons, and Jane Asher, the actress and activist, on the march today: _ 2.02pm: The Public and Commercial Services union has sent me an email about the march. Members of the PCS joined the protesters, and the union focused on planned cuts to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which covers discrimination based on disability. Employees walked out for one hour today in protest. A PCS spokesman said: This financial mess was created by bankers and to make the vulnerable pay for a crisis they did not cause the government is cutting lifelines like the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s helpline and slashing the independent living allowance, disability living allowance and employment support allowance … [This] will mean disabled people will be forced to retreat back into their homes, and become entrenched in poverty … The government has received a powerful message from today’s marchers that people are prepared to stand up in defence of benefits and services for the most vulnerable people. 1.54pm: Labour activist Stewart Owadally paints a vivid picture of the march : _ 1.30pm: Karen McVeigh has been talking to more marchers. Mary Carr, 46, a public sector worker from Nottingham who has mental health issues, was carrying a black coffin with the words “disability equality” written on the side. Despite having a fear of crowds she was keen to protest against the government, which she said was “demonising disabled people”. Carr said: “I’m fortunate in that I can hold down a job. I have access to work support and the government pays for taxis to take me to work. They haven’t cut that but the warning signs are there. A lot of my disabled colleagues have lost their jobs because in public services they are targeting local offices and disabled people can’t travel to get to other places. We signed up to the European convention for people with disabilities but if you go through the effects of the cuts – transport, education, housing, all the rights I have to take part in society are being eroded. It’s the poor and disabled who are more reliant on the public sector.” 1.12pm: On Twitter, hotcrossbunny sums up how many demonstrators and commenters below the line here seem to be feeling about the lack of media coverage of the march. _ 1.07pm: Karen McVeigh sends more from the march: Aileen Feasey, 52, from near Bodmin, Cornwall, came to London with her sons Andrew, 24, and Alastair, 19, on the overnight sleeper last night. Feasey said that she is marching for the rights of people like Andrew, who has down’s syndrome, to lead an independent life. Since 2009 he has one day a week in a work placement scheme as a general assistant in a leisure centre 15 miles away. But last month, she was told that his transport costs would no longer be paid by the council. He is now unable to go. Feasey said: “All we’ve fought for all Andrew’s life is going backwards. Without transport he is a prisoner in his own home. He doesn’t understand why he can’t go. He gets his leisure centre T-shirt on on Mondays and it’s very difficult to explain to him. We live in Cornwall; it’s a 40 mile round trip anywhere.” Andrew used to get £55 mobility allowance, which is being cut. “He used to go to the theatre group, college a couple of days a week. But he’s unable to contribute to his transport costs. It’s unfair and it feels unlawful to charge his benefits against transport.” Feasey, who is self-employed, was planning to go to university, but does not know if she now can. “I’ve cared for him for 24 years, to be an independent young man. But our lives have been turned upside down by this cut.” 1.02pm: Karen McVeigh has just called with news of the speakers at the march. Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, who handed the government its “no money left” line when he left office, said he thought it was more important to be out with the marchers than listening to David Cameron at prime minister’s questions. Mark Harrison, the chief executive of the Coalition of Disabled People, commenting on the absence of Maria Miller, the minister for disabled people, called for a vote of no confidence in her and said she was now “the minister against disabled people”. “All those in favour … ” he said, prompting a big cheer from the demonstrators. “All those against … ” Silence. “That’s unanimous,” Harrison concluded. 12.52pm: The march is on, Lucy Glennon reports: “A bus full of tourists on a tour are cheering us on as we move along. Hopefully they understand the purpose of the march. Hope people in parliament can hear us and will make an effort to see us; many are struggling to walk.” 12.43pm: Margaret Curran, the shadow disabled minister , has tweeted that she is on the march and calls it a “unanimous vote of no confidence” for her opposite number in the government: _ 12.31pm: Lucy Glennon , one of the marchers ( see 9.37am ), sends this update: Thousands here already. So many different people with many different conditions. A lot more assistance dogs than I anticipated. Users of motorised wheelchairs and scooters are politely letting one another through like organised traffic. People feel quite passionate already. The marchers from Mind have clappers. Great atmosphere already. Would recommend people come down now if they still want to. 12.20pm: My colleagues on the video desk have produced this film of disabled people campaigning at the headquarters of Atos Origin, the company employed by the government to assess whether or not they are fit to work. _ 12.16pm: Over on the NHS live blog , my colleagues Randeep Ramesh and Rowenna Davis are hosting a web chat from 1pm-2pm with the CEO of the MS Society, Simon Gillespie, and members of Acevo and the Stroke Association answering your questions live. At 4-5pm, a panel of patients and carers for people with long-term and chronic conditions will be discussing how the health reforms might affect them. 12.11pm: My colleague Karen McVeigh has just phoned from the march, where she has been speaking to demonstrators. At Victoria Embankment Richard Hawkes, chief executive of Scope, said that he hoped the march would give disabled people a sense that they are not alone. “Above all it’s really important for the people here today to have a sense of coming together, that there are a lot of people who are interested in the rights of disabled people,” he said. “That is one of the most powerful things for them. There is an unfortunate narrative, a myth that has been perpetuated by certain tabloid newspapers, that there are a lot of benefit scroungers. The government’s own statistics show that less than 2% of people who claim incapacity benefit do so fraudulently. Our experience is that most disabled people want to work. But they need support to do so, to overcome transport issues and other issues related to disability. “There is a combined impact of the reform of the disability living allowance, DLA, the test for incapacity benefit, the removal of the mobility component of DLA for those in residential care, and cuts to local authority support services that have had a huge impact on disabled people. That has led to a lot of disabled people being hugely concerned and hugely worried. We know there’s a deficit but the government has said we’re in it together. Taking away the DLA mobility allowance for people in residential care, which means that they can’t go out, is not a sign that we are in it together.” Sheila Gardiner, 62, from Derbyshire, worked as a bookkeeper until she had a stroke five years ago. She is now unable to walk or transfer from her wheelchair unaided, and lives in a Leonard Cheshire Disability care home. She currently gets £49.85 DLA support each week, which is under threat. “They want to take away my DLA mobility. If they do, I won’t be able to see my daughter Serene graduate from acting school in London. I go to college – I already have an A-level in computing – but I won’t be able to do that either. I have to travel by train or taxi as I can’t transfer from my wheelchair. This is going backwards towards Victorian times when people were either very rich or very poor.” Tony Vanterpool, 53, from Brampton in Cambridgeshire, has been deaf since birth, but had a stroke 11 years ago which left him in a wheelchair and unable to properly use sign language. On his lap was a “lightwriter”, a small typewriter which prints what he is saying. He is helped 10 hours a week by a communication support worker, Jan Smith, who was with him today. Vanterpool said: “I came to campaign with all the disabled people because the government are cutting my mobility allowance. I nee this to go to the deaf club.” Smith explained that where Vanterpool lives in a care home there are no other deaf people, the staff do not sign, and he is unable to speak in sign language. Vanterpool said: “I like going to deaf club. I meet friends there.” Going to the deaf club once a month, which is his only link to similar people, costs £17 round trip, which is paid for by the mobility allowance of the DLA. 11.28am: The Broken of Britain has also posted this video to mark the march, entitled We have a Dream. Despite the crippling debt of the post war years, our grandfathers and grandmothers made sure their dream of a society caring for all was a priority … We refuse to accept a system bailed out by the taxpayer is so bankrupt it can no longer meet it’s obligations to the basic welfare of all people. We refuse to believe in a world which bankers choose to increase bonuses whilst disabled people choose between food and heat. We refuse to believe local authorities deem it right and proper to save money by leaving old ladies overnight in their own urine, we refuse to believe that removing respite care can be right. We refuse to believe that we should be blamed, targeted, made less human by those who sip from the cup of success. _ 11.15am: Yesterday the blog The Broken of Britain addressed the argument that “there is no money left” and so benefits must be cut: There is a lot of money left. The UK is one of the richest nations in the OECD, and the financial crisis has not changed that – it is only that the super-rich … have moved this money where it does not benefit the nation at large. Fourthly, even if there were no money left, we should borrow sensibly – cutting public expenditure dramatically at this time will serve only to reverse economic growth, widening the fiscal deficit. 10.27am: Asked about the march, a spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said the government’s “commitment to support disabled people to live independent lives will not change”. Every disabled person will still get support, but the benefits system is not working. It’s trapped people on benefits. We want to give people the support to get into the workplace, and that’s what our reforms are all about. We have a raft of support available to do this. We want to reassure people that that won’t change. In a statement, the DWP added: We are reforming welfare to make sure that the billions we spend on benefits goes to those who need it and that for the first time disabled people get proper help and support to live independent lives and work in the mainstream jobs that they want. 10.10am: Amelia Gentleman has been speaking to marchers: Pepe Martinez, 58, arrived by train from Huntingdon, where he’s a resident at a Leonard Cheshire home, hoping that the protest might help persuade the government to rethink its plan to cut disability allowance payments. He’s a Tory voter and hadn’t expected disability benefits to be affected when he voted for the party last year. A former nurse, who spent 35 years caring for others in the NHS, he has been surprised by attitudes towards disabled people since developing a degenerative condition 10 years ago. “I thought we were lucky in Britain; I thought this was a caring nation. Now I don’t think that,” he says. Without the mobility component of DLA, which the government plans to cut, he “won’t be able to be a part of life generally”. He worries he’ll be stuck inside the care home unable to visit friends and family outside. “We’ll be like zombies,” he says. I met Billie Smith, a carer with Leonard Cheshire disability, at King’s Cross station coming in with a small group of demonstrators just after 9am. She has spent the past month making arrangements to help five of the 20 residents at the Manor home in Cambridgeshire get to London for the march. The process has illustrated the enormous difficulties facing disabled people when they use public transport. Since only two wheelchairs are allowed on each First Direct train she had to book residents and carers on three separate trains. She had to give the rail company 24 hours notice of their intention to travel. Arrangements have sucked up most of her time for the past week. But she’s been happy to do it because she also wants to register her protest at today’s march. After 20 years working for the charity, trying to improve conditions, she’s worried that things are taking a step backwards. “If they cut DLA there’s a chance people will become institutionalised again,” she says, shouting over the noise of commuters arriving for work. 9.37am: Good morning. Between 5,000 and 10,000 disabled people are expected to march in London today in a rally against cuts to benefits and services. The Hardest Hit march, organised jointly by the UK Disabled People’s Council and the Disability Benefits Consortium, is expected to be the largest event of its kind for decades. The protesters are voicing their anger at the combined effects of changes to welfare eligibility, cuts to disability living allowance and reductions in council funding for carers and services. In a comment piece in today’s Guardian, Sue Marsh, who blogs at Diary of a Benefit Scrounger , explains more : Sick and disabled people will lose £9bn in vital support over the lifetime of this parliament. That’s a colossal 10% of George Osborne’s entire £89bn deficit reduction plan. Some studies have found that it will cost the disabled a full third of our incomes. Incapacity benefit is being phased out and the much tougher employment support allowance (ESA) is disqualifying 93% of claimants from long-term support. Disability living allowance is being scrapped and replaced with “personal independent payments”, which will disqualify a further 20% of the most severely disabled. In another comment piece, Alice Maynard , the chair of disability charity Scope, adds: The simple fact is that daily life costs more if you are disabled, which means disabled people and their families are more vulnerable to the impact of losing a local service, a wage freeze or seeing their benefits adjusted. Marchers will be addressed by Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary. Maria Miller, minister for disabled people, declined an invitation to attend, on the grounds that she needed to be at prime minister’s questions, according to Jaspal Dhani, chief executive of the United Kingdom Disabled People’s Council. My colleagues Amelia Gentleman and Karen McVeigh are with the march and we’ll be hearing from them shortly, and my colleagues from the video desk will be sending footage as soon as possible. Amelia wrote a story about the march in today’s Guardian, which you can read here . Lucy Glennon, who has the rare skin condition epidermolysis bullosa, explained why she was marching today, and we’ll be hearing more from her throughout the day: I’m joining the march today in the hope that it will raise awareness on the cuts and changes to welfare and benefits and how they will significantly impact disabled people. While I understand everyone has to accept some change to their life in order for the country to save money, it is not really appreciated how much more disabled people are going to feel the bite of the cuts, and many are already adapting to changes with difficulty. I have a painful condition, epidermolysis bullosa, and today I am taking part in the march being pushed in my wheelchair by Cynthia Richards, one of the social care managers for DEBRA , the charity that helps people with my condition and works to find a cure. With regard to people with EB, we believe it is wrong that those who are completely unable to walk, including children, could be ticked as being fine to ‘mobilise’ under the proposed changes to Disability Living Allowance, which is being replaced with a much more unfair system of assessment for Personal Independent Payment. It is also wrong that the new assessment for Employment Support Allowance does not give much consideration to pain experienced when doing tasks or walking, when some people with EB are unable to walk without strong opiates, as walking often creates sores and wounds on their feet. It is also unfair that some people with EB have already been told by their local councils not to request more care, no matter how much they need it, as it would put their existing care package under assessment and could result in it stopping completely. Here’s a rough schedule for today : 11.30am onwards: Campaigners gather on Victoria Embankment by Horseguards Avenue. 12-12.30pm: Rally on Victoria Embankment. Speakers include disabled people, MPs and Jane Asher. 12.30pm-1.30pm: March – from Victoria Embankment, along Parliament Square and Millbank, finishing at Dean Stanley Street. 1.30pm-5.30pm: Campaigners meeting their MPs in Westminster Hall. The actress Jane Asher is president of three disability organisations involved in the march: Arthritis Care, National Autistic Society and Parkinson’s UK. You can find the website for the march here . Disability London Protest Welfare Public sector cuts Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
‘Legal highs’ outstrip attempts at regulation

EU agencies warn synthetic psychoactive substances are spreading at an unprecedented rate, with 41 new ones in 2010 New “legal highs” are being made widely available online and in specialised shops at an unprecedented pace, outstripping attempts to control them, the European Union’s drugs agency has warned. In a report published jointly with the law enforcement agency Europol , the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) says in 2010 the two agencies officially noted 41 new psychoactive substances, many of them imitating the effects of ecstasy. Fourteen of them were first identified in Britain. The Lisbon-based monitoring centre says the new substances are appearing at an “unprecedented pace”, with the 41 new ones the largest number reported in any single year. The figure compares with 24 identified in 2009 and 13 in 2008. The agencies say roughly a quarter of the substances identified last year – 11 of the 41 – were variants on synthetic cannabis drugs such as Spice , which 16 European countries, including Britain, have decided to ban or control amid health concerns. A further 15 are synthetic cathinone derivatives, including mephedrone – also known as meow meow – which imitate the effects of ecstasy, amphetamines and cocaine. These were banned across Europe last December. The European drugs experts also identified for the first time derivatives of two other established drugs, ketamine and PCP. The report says many of the newly identified substances were picked up by national police agencies through test purchases either online or from specialised “smart” or “head” shops. Many are marketed as legal highs or as plant food, and labelled “not for human consumption”. The descriptions are specifically designed to circumvent drug controls. It says their accelerating proliferation demonstrates the speed and sophistication at which the market is reacting to attempts to ban or control them, and the growing challenges presented by globalisation and innovation. Many are being developed by chemists in illegal laboratories in south-east Asia. Wolfgang Götz, the EMCDDA’s director, said: “Given the speed at which new developments occur in this area, it is important to anticipate future challenges. While our early-warning system has recently upped its operational capacity to react rapidly to new substances and products identified, it currently lacks the ability to anticipate emerging threats.” He suggested the EU should give the agency the power to buy the new compounds so it could synthesise and study them. Rob Wainwright, Europol’s director, said the emergence of the substances was now a major feature of Europe’s drugs problem: “Organised crime groups are increasingly active in producing and distributing drugs which can be associated with ecstasy,” he said. “We are determined to combat this phenomenon.” Drugs trade Drugs Health European Union Drugs Drugs policy Police Alan Travis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …