Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1475)

Yes, Bristol Palin did indeed have surgery at the end of last year, but not the kind you might think . The 20-year-old explains to Us the reason she looks so different these days: jaw surgery. Corrective jaw surgery. “It’s not plastic surgery,” she says. “Yes, it improved the way I…

Continue reading …

President Obama is preparing to give a major speech aimed at the Middle East, arguing that Osama bin Laden’s death, coupled with the “Arab spring” uprisings, herald the end of al-Qaeda’s grip on the Muslim imagination. “It’s an interesting coincidence of timing—that he is killed at the same time…

Continue reading …

You’ve never seen a balloon like this before. Anish Kapoor’s single, staggering 82,000-cubic-yard monster has taken over Paris’s glass-roofed Grand Palais. Leviathan , which opened today and runs through June 23, lives up to its name in size, though its “skin” is PVC vinyl, barely thicker than that of a…

Continue reading …

Agreement comes after nearly 18 months of hostilities, including 22 days of walkouts, and will be debated by BA crew at Unite meeting near Heathrow airport British Airways and the Unite trade union have taken a significant step towards ending a long-running dispute with cabin crew after agreeing a peace deal on Wednesday. The agreement comes after nearly 18 months of hostilities, including 22 days of walkouts, and will be debated by BA crew at a Unite meeting near Heathrow airport on Thursday. Bassa, Unite’s main cabin crew branch, said in email to members: “The talks have now concluded to the satisfaction of both parties. “If the branch agrees, the negotiated settlement will be put to the full membership in a postal ballot.” The general secretary of Unite, Len McCluskey, is expected to recommend the deal in what would be a breakthrough for both sides. Two previous peace agreements were scrapped after Unite declined to recommend them amid ongoing concerns over sanctions against crew members who took part in strikes last year. It is understood the agreement restores staff travel perks stripped from thousands of crew who took part in the strikes, as well as allowing arbitration of the dozens of disciplinary cases – including sackings – that were linked to the dispute. BA’s worst-ever industrial relations dispute began in 2009 when the airline unilaterally reduced staffing levels on long-haul flights following a voluntary redundancy programme. Unite launched a strike ballot in protest at the cuts and the lack of consultation, triggering a year of high court hearings, strike votes and walkouts. But changes in leadership on both sides this year raised hopes of a deal being struck after Willie Walsh, BA’s former chief executive, moved upstairs to BA’s parent group and Tony Woodley, the joint general secretary of Unite, handed over the reins to McCluskey. In the most bizarre interlude in the peace talks between Walsh and Woodley last year, members of the Socialist Workers party broke into discussions at the Acas conciliation service. British Airways Airline industry Travel & leisure Unite Trade unions Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Christine Lagarde under investigation over role in payments to Bernard Tapie

The French finance minister is to be the subject of a full judicial inquiry after Tapie received £248m to end 15-year legal dispute She’s a former synchronised swimmer who became the first female finance minister of a leading industrialised country and one of France’s most popular rightwing politicians. Christine Lagarde could see her golden image shaken by a judicial investigation into whether she abused her position to favour a controversial tycoon. Lagarde, once a lawyer in Chicago, has become embroiled in the soap-opera saga of Bernard Tapie, one of the most flamboyant and controversial figures in French public life. Tapie is a maverick rags-to-riches tycoon whose CV includes a stint as head of Marseille football club, head of the Adidas sports empire, left-wing urban affairs minister under Francois Mitterrand, a seven-month jail term for match-fixing, a conviction for tax fraud and an amazing public comeback as an actor, singer, chatshow host and supporter of Nicolas Sarkozy. For almost two decades, a battle raged through the courts after Tapie claimed he was cheated by the Credit Lyonnais bank which handled the 1993 sale of Adidas. Credit Lyonnais, once publicly owned, had been wound up and its liabilities taken over by a state-operated consortium. In 2007, Lagarde intervened and ended the court dispute by ordering a special panel of judges to arbitrate. In 2008, they ruled that Tapie should receive €285m (£248m) in damages. The out-of-court settlement scandalised opposition politicians. The centrist Francois Bayrou said it was “unthinkable that the state dips into the taxpayers’ pocket for a private beneficiary”. At the time, Lagarde tried to calm the row, saying that, after tax and debt payments, Tapie would only pocket about €30m. Later reports suggested he kept about €200m. The Socialists accused Lagarde of improper conduct by intervening and asked for a full-scale investigation. Jean-Louis Nadal, the public prosecutor, has now recommended a full judicial inquiry into Lagarde’s role, saying there was evidence of “several reasons to be suspicious of the regularity and even the legality” of the settlement, which could constitute “an abuse of authority”. He suggested the case should not have been settled in private since public money was at stake. Lagarde denounced an attempt to sully her name, telling Le Figaro: “This is an attempt to smear me.” She accused Socialists of trying to gloss over the reality that the Tapie saga dated from the Mitterrand era when they were in power. She said: “For my part, I’ve always acted with rigour and transparency, in only one sense: the public interest.” She said she was “as calm as I have always been” over the affair. She added that she had “total government support”. Eva Joly, the former anti-corruption investigative magistrate and potential green party presidential candidate, said Lagarde might have received “instructions” directly from the Elysée. She said the settlement was completely abnormal in the way it was done and the amount awarded. She said the inquiry must look at who had ordered the settlement and what they got out of it. “This could be a corruption affair.” Other politicians questioned Sarkozy’s friendship with Tapie. Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Joly’s fellow MEP for the green party, Europe Ecologie Les Verts, told French TV, “What I know is that Lagarde’s decision was pushed by Nicolas Sarkozy. It’s Sarkozy’s responsibility and his friendship with Bernard Tapie that’s under discussion here.” The Socialist Segolene Royal said Lagarde had not made the decision alone and was “doubtless the victim of Sarkozy’s orders”. Lagarde, 55, is one of France’s best known ministers abroad, for her fluent English and regular US TV appearances. She recently denied charges of a conflict of interest over a personal stake in a small business start-up, saying some people took pleasure in trying to stab her in the back. She said she handed her shares over to an intermediary to “close the controversy”. Christine Lagarde Nicolas Sarkozy France Europe Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Body count rises in Mexican drug wars as more mass graves uncovered

Eight victims dug up in Durango bring that state’s total to 188 in a month, exceeding that of Tamaulipas last month Mexican soldiers searching for victims of the country’s drug wars have found eight more bodies in mass graves in the northern state of Durango, bringing the total number of victims there to 188. The body count in Durango makes it the largest discovery yet of secretly buried corpses in the inter-cartel conflict , surpassing the 183 bodies found in pits last month in the state of Tamaulipas, on the United States border. Troops discovered the latest victims on Tuesday. Digging continues at five graves discovered last month in the state capital, Durango city, said Fernando Rios, a state public safety department spokesman. State authorities said some of the victims have been dead for up to four years, while others were buried as recently as three months ago. Although investigators in Durango have refused to speculate on a motive for the killings, authorities have blamed drug cartels for other such mass graves discovered over the past year in Mexico . Drug violence has killed more than 34,000 people in Mexico since the president, Felipe Calderón, launched a military-led crackdown on the cartels in December 2006. The murder rate in Durangohas has more than doubled over the past two years. At least 1,025 homicides were reported in 2010, compared to 930 in 2009 and 430 in 2008, according to government figures. Authorities suspect some of the most-wanted drug kingpins may be hiding in the mountainous state, which has been a battleground between the Sinaloa, Zetas and Beltran Leyva cartels. Families of people who have disappeared in Durango have come forward to ask whether their relatives may have been buried in the mass graves, according to Juan Rosales, the deputy state public safety secretary. But he said the identification process has overwhelmed the state government, prompting it to seek help from central government. Many of the victims unearthed in Tamaulipas may have been captured by the Zeta drug cartel , which controls much of the state and has been kidnapping Mexicans and foreign migrants to demand extortion money or forcibly recruit them as gunmen or drug mules . Human rights groups calculate that 10,000 mostly Central American migrants were kidnapped as they crossed Mexico on their way to the United States during a recent six month period, mostly to demand ransoms from their families, with Tamaulipas the most dangerous part of their traditional routes. There is no estimate for the number killed. Mexico Drugs trade David Batty guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Body count rises in Mexican drug wars as more mass graves uncovered

Eight victims dug up in Durango bring that state’s total to 188 in a month, exceeding that of Tamaulipas last month Mexican soldiers searching for victims of the country’s drug wars have found eight more bodies in mass graves in the northern state of Durango, bringing the total number of victims there to 188. The body count in Durango makes it the largest discovery yet of secretly buried corpses in the inter-cartel conflict , surpassing the 183 bodies found in pits last month in the state of Tamaulipas, on the United States border. Troops discovered the latest victims on Tuesday. Digging continues at five graves discovered last month in the state capital, Durango city, said Fernando Rios, a state public safety department spokesman. State authorities said some of the victims have been dead for up to four years, while others were buried as recently as three months ago. Although investigators in Durango have refused to speculate on a motive for the killings, authorities have blamed drug cartels for other such mass graves discovered over the past year in Mexico . Drug violence has killed more than 34,000 people in Mexico since the president, Felipe Calderón, launched a military-led crackdown on the cartels in December 2006. The murder rate in Durangohas has more than doubled over the past two years. At least 1,025 homicides were reported in 2010, compared to 930 in 2009 and 430 in 2008, according to government figures. Authorities suspect some of the most-wanted drug kingpins may be hiding in the mountainous state, which has been a battleground between the Sinaloa, Zetas and Beltran Leyva cartels. Families of people who have disappeared in Durango have come forward to ask whether their relatives may have been buried in the mass graves, according to Juan Rosales, the deputy state public safety secretary. But he said the identification process has overwhelmed the state government, prompting it to seek help from central government. Many of the victims unearthed in Tamaulipas may have been captured by the Zeta drug cartel , which controls much of the state and has been kidnapping Mexicans and foreign migrants to demand extortion money or forcibly recruit them as gunmen or drug mules . Human rights groups calculate that 10,000 mostly Central American migrants were kidnapped as they crossed Mexico on their way to the United States during a recent six month period, mostly to demand ransoms from their families, with Tamaulipas the most dangerous part of their traditional routes. There is no estimate for the number killed. Mexico Drugs trade David Batty guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
WikiLeaks: US opens grand jury hearing

First session of process of deciding whether to prosecute website and founder Julian Assange for espionage The US government has opened a grand jury hearing into the passing of hundreds of thousands of state secrets to WikiLeaks – the start of the process of deciding whether to prosecute the website and its founder, Julian Assange, for espionage. The first session of the grand jury is understood to have begun in Alexandria, Virginia, with the forced testimony of a man from Boston, Masachusetts. The unidentified man was subpoenad to appear before the panel. The terms of the subpoena – first revealed by the Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald – gave a clear indication that the jury has been convened specifically to consider whether to approve the prosecution of Assange and Wikileaks. It said the hearing was investigating “possible violations of federal criminal law involving, but not necessarily limited to, conspiracy to communicate or transmit national defence information in violation of” the Espionage Act. The Act, which was introduced in 1917 just after the US entered the first world war, was modelled on Britain’s Official Secrets Act. It was most famously applied, unsuccessfully, in 1971 against Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon papers on the Vietnam war. The subpoena also reveals that the grand jury is considering approving a prosecution on grounds of “knowingly accessing a computer without authorisation or exceeding authorized access” and “knowingly stealing or converting any record or thing of value of the United States or any department or agency thereof”. That would appear to point more in the direction of Bradley Manning, the US military intelligence specialist currently facing court martial as the suspected source of the WikiLeaks documents. The US has had a hard time so far trying to make charges, other than against Manning, stick in the WikiLeaks saga. The Espionage Act has never been applied successfully against a non-government party, and to have a reasonable chance of prosecuting Assange or WikiLeaks as an organisation, the authorities would need to be able to prove to the satisfaction of a jury that they had actively encouraged or assisted the source of the leaks to transmit unauthorised material. The FBI has been focusing its investigations aggressively on the hacker community of Boston, around the technology university MIT, in the hope of gaining information on how Assange made contact with his source. Wednesday’s hearing is likely to be part of that effort. The public radio network NPR pointed out that the WikiLeaks grand jury is just one of a spate of federal investigations into leaking that constitutes a major crack down by the Obama administration. There are currently five separate criminal prosecutions relating to official leaks under way, a surge in activity that national security experts say is a worrying attack on the rights of whistle blowers. The WikiLeaks grand jury, comprising of between 16 and 24 jurors, will sit in total secret. It will act as a kind of pre-trial, considering the prosecution evidence and calling witnesses, before finally deciding on whether or not to advance a prosecution. WikiLeaks Julian Assange United States The US embassy cables Ed Pilkington guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
WikiLeaks: US opens grand jury hearing

First session of process of deciding whether to prosecute website and founder Julian Assange for espionage The US government has opened a grand jury hearing into the passing of hundreds of thousands of state secrets to WikiLeaks – the start of the process of deciding whether to prosecute the website and its founder, Julian Assange, for espionage. The first session of the grand jury is understood to have begun in Alexandria, Virginia, with the forced testimony of a man from Boston, Masachusetts. The unidentified man was subpoenad to appear before the panel. The terms of the subpoena – first revealed by the Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald – gave a clear indication that the jury has been convened specifically to consider whether to approve the prosecution of Assange and Wikileaks. It said the hearing was investigating “possible violations of federal criminal law involving, but not necessarily limited to, conspiracy to communicate or transmit national defence information in violation of” the Espionage Act. The Act, which was introduced in 1917 just after the US entered the first world war, was modelled on Britain’s Official Secrets Act. It was most famously applied, unsuccessfully, in 1971 against Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon papers on the Vietnam war. The subpoena also reveals that the grand jury is considering approving a prosecution on grounds of “knowingly accessing a computer without authorisation or exceeding authorized access” and “knowingly stealing or converting any record or thing of value of the United States or any department or agency thereof”. That would appear to point more in the direction of Bradley Manning, the US military intelligence specialist currently facing court martial as the suspected source of the WikiLeaks documents. The US has had a hard time so far trying to make charges, other than against Manning, stick in the WikiLeaks saga. The Espionage Act has never been applied successfully against a non-government party, and to have a reasonable chance of prosecuting Assange or WikiLeaks as an organisation, the authorities would need to be able to prove to the satisfaction of a jury that they had actively encouraged or assisted the source of the leaks to transmit unauthorised material. The FBI has been focusing its investigations aggressively on the hacker community of Boston, around the technology university MIT, in the hope of gaining information on how Assange made contact with his source. Wednesday’s hearing is likely to be part of that effort. The public radio network NPR pointed out that the WikiLeaks grand jury is just one of a spate of federal investigations into leaking that constitutes a major crack down by the Obama administration. There are currently five separate criminal prosecutions relating to official leaks under way, a surge in activity that national security experts say is a worrying attack on the rights of whistle blowers. The WikiLeaks grand jury, comprising of between 16 and 24 jurors, will sit in total secret. It will act as a kind of pre-trial, considering the prosecution evidence and calling witnesses, before finally deciding on whether or not to advance a prosecution. WikiLeaks Julian Assange United States The US embassy cables Ed Pilkington guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Disabled marchers turn out in thousands for benefits protest

Many of the demonstrators fear that, despite changes that have already affected them disproportionately, the worst is yet to come Waving placards with slogans such as “I didn’t chose to be disabled” and “Easy Target: cuts to disabled disgraceful”, thousands of people took to the streets of Westminster to protest at the government’s spending cuts and benefit reforms. The protesters, many of whom had never been on a demonstration before, included people who are virtually immobile. With an army of supporters, relatives, charities and friends, those who were able to walked, while others used wheelchairs to make the trip past the Houses of Parliament. Two thousand people had signed up to speak to their MPs after the march, according to organisers. Many were angry about cuts in mobility allowance, which they say will limit their independence; others at the changes to payments from disability living allowance to child benefit, which they claim will hit them hardest. Many of the demonstrators fear that, despite changes that have already affected them disproportionately, the worst is yet to come. At a rally before the march, speakers included the shadow work and pensions secretary, Liam Byrne, and Labour MP Dame Anne Begg, who chairs the work and pensions select committee and is herself a wheelchair user. Jane Asher, the actor and president of the Arthritis Council, National Autistic Society and Parkinson’s UK, told the rally: “This is the largest rally of disabled people in living memory, and that’s something to be proud of – at the same time, it is very sad that it has come to this.” She described the cuts as “cruel and misguided” and said: “The prime minister said that the savings would protect the vulnerable. Far from protecting the vulnerable, these cuts are bearing down disproportionately on those with disability.” Wheelchair user Tony Vanterpool, 53, from Brampton in Cambridgeshire, said he had come to protest at the cutting of his mobility allowance of £17 a month. Vanterpool, who has been deaf since birth, lost his ability to use sign language as well as his mobility after a stroke five years ago, said: “I’ve come to campaign with all the disabled people because the government are cutting my mobility allowance.” Speaking through a signing interpreter and with the aid of a light writer on his lap, which displays the words he types, he said: “I need [the allowance] to go to the deaf club.” His signer and support worker, Jan Smith, said: “Because Tony’s fully deaf, it’s the only chance he gets to meet people and relax and use his own language – signing.” Julie Fernandez, who played Brenda in The Office, said the government should be doing more to help disabled people who want to work. A wheelchair user, she said: “The government want to get people into employment in principle, but we are living in a recession and the business community don’t see disabled people as viable employers. “They see us as people who are going to be taking time off sick or who aren’t intelligent enough. They should stop penalising disabled people and start making the business community and public transport more accessible.”Fernandez, 37, from Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, said the film and TV industry was “incredibly discriminatory” as it was still seen as acceptable to have able-bodied actors playing disabled characters. “There are millions of people across the UK with permanent disabilities. They need to be supported – they don’t need to be living in fear of having their benefits taken away.” Carrying a black coffin with the words “disability equality” on the side, Mary Carr, 46, accused the government of “demonising disabled people”. Carr said: “I’m fortunate in that I can hold down a job. I have access to work support and the government pays for taxis to take me to work. They haven’t cut that, but the warning signs are there. “A lot of my disabled colleagues have lost their jobs, because in public services they are targeting local offices and disabled people can’t travel to get to other places. We signed up to the European convention for people with disabilities, but if you go through the effects of the cuts – transport, education, housing – all the rights I have to take part in society are being eroded. It’s the poor and disabled who are more reliant on the public sector.” Sheila Gardiner, 62, from Derbyshire, was a book keeper until she had a stroke five years ago. Now unable to walk or transfer from her wheelchair unaided, she lives in a Leonard Cheshire disability care home, and currently gets £49.85 DLA support every week, which is under threat. Gardiner said: “Britain is going backwards towards Victorian times when people were either very rich or very poor.” The Hardest Hit march was organised by the UK Disabled People’s Council and the Disability Benefits Consortium, and was supported by organisations including Mind, Mencap RNIB and Sense. Richard Hawkes, the chief executive of the charity Scope, said that he hoped the march would give disabled people a sense that they were not alone. “We know there’s a deficit, but government has said we’re in it together. Taking away the DLA mobility allowance for people in residential care, which means that they can’t go out, is not a sign that we are all in it together.” The organisers said about 5,000 people took part in the march. Scotland Yard put the figure between 2,000 and 3,000 and said it passed off without incident. Disability London Welfare Karen McVeigh guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …