Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1315)
Libya: Britain prepares ‘bunker buster’ bombs for assaults

Paveway bombs weighing 2,000lbs to be loaded onto RAF jets for possible strikes on Gaddafi command centres Britain has ratcheted up the pressure on Colonel Muammar Gaddafi by preparing to load heavy “bunker buster” bombs on RAF jets ready to attack his compounds in and around Tripoli. Paveway bombs, weighing 2,000lbs, the largest in the RAF’s arsenal, have been dispatched to Gioia del Colle in southern Italy where RAF Tornado and Typhoon jets are based. While the Apache’s cannon and Hellfire missiles are used against small or moving targets, the Paveway bombs are expected to be used against bunkers underneath the Gaddafi regime’s Bab al-Azizia compound in Tripoli and elsewhere. The MoD said on Sunday the enhanced Paveway III bombs, are designed “to punch through the roof or wall of a hardened building”. The bombs join smaller laser or satellite-guided Paveway bombs, Brimstone missiles and Tomahawk submarine-launched cruise missiles, with which the army and navy have been attacking targets in Libya for more than two months. The enhanced Paveway III “gives the RAF an additional capability to attack hardened structures in Libya like command centres or communications nodes”, the MoD said. Gaddafi had “a lot of bunkers”, Liam Fox, the defence secretary, said on Sunday. The facilities were used “partly for accommodation” but “largely for military control”, he told the Andrew Marr show on BBC One. Those who used “dual use facilities” would be vulnerable if they were in the bunkers’, Fox added. Libya Defence policy Liam Fox Andrew Marr Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Sepp Blatter cleared as Fifa suspends Bin Hammam and Warner

• President free to stand alone for re-election • Full details on the hearing on our blog Fifa will open a “full-blown” investigation into allegations that Mohamed bin Hammam and Jack Warner offered financial incentives to members of the Caribbean Football Union and has provisionally suspended them from all football activity, the world football’s governing body has confirmed. Sepp Blatter, Fifa’s current president, however, will not face an investigation into the allegations that he knew about the payments. He will be free to stand for re-election unopposed at Wednesday’s presidential vote after Bin Hammam withdrew from the race on Saturday night. “No investigation against Blatter is warranted,” said the deputy chairman of the ethics committee Petrus Damaseb, who chaired the meeting that heard the evidence. The ethics committee said there was sufficient evidence further to investigate allegations that Bin Hammam and Warner offered $40,000 bribes to delegates at a Caribbean football association meeting on 10-11 May in Trinidad. The payments were allegedly made to secure votes for Bin Hammam in his campaign to unseat Blatter as the head of football’s governing body. The evidence was submitted to Fifa by the American executive committee member Chuck Blazer. “We are satisfied that there is a case to be answered,” said Damaseb. Bin Hammam, who alongside Warner denied any wrongdoing, had asked the ethics panel to investigate Blatter on grounds that he knew of alleged bribe attempts and did nothing about it. But the Fifa panel said there was no evidence to take action against Blatter. Two officials from the Caribbean Football Union, Debbie Minguell and Jason Sylvester, who were alleged to have handed over the money, have also been suspended pending a full inquiry. Jérôme Valcke, Fifa’s general secretary, was asked whether the investigation into the claims against Bin Hammam, the Qatari president of the Asian football confederation, would also lead to an inquiry into the decision to award Qatar the 2022 World Cup. “It was not discussed by the committee,” replied Valcke. Fifa has also announced that the Football Association has cleared the Fifa members Ricardo Teixeira and Worawi Makudi of allegations of bribery made by Lord Triesman relating to England’s failed 2018 World Cup bid. Fifa Mohamed bin Hammam Sepp Blatter Jack Warner Football politics Tom Bryant guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Tributes paid to Royal Marines killed in Afghanistan

Sam Alexander and Ollie Augustin were killed by a blast from an improvised explosive device in Helmand province The families of two Royal Marines who died in an explosion in Afghanistan have paid tribute to them . Marine Sam Alexander, 28, from Hammersmith, west London, and 23-year-old Lieutenant Ollie Augustin, from Kent, were killed by an improvised explosive device in Helmand province on Friday. The men, both from Juliet Company 42 Commando Royal Marines, had been on patrol in the Loy Mandeh area of the Nad-e Ali district. In 2009, Alexander was awarded the Military Cross for gallantry during a previous tour of Afghanistan. Earlier that year, he charged at a Taliban position with his pistol to save a wounded colleague. Colleagues described him as an example to all who worked with him. His wife, Claire, said: “He risked his safety for his friends, but never batted an eyelid. It was his job, and a job he did well. “Sam was a loving husband and a wonderful father. He was our rock and my best friend. He has been taken from me all too soon.” Alexander also leaves a son, Leo, and parents, Stuart and Serena. The commanding officer of 42 Commando Royal Marines, Lieutenant Colonel Ewen Murchison, said Alexander had joined “the legends, the bravest of the brave”. Augustin, who was leading Friday’s patrol, was said to have made a considerable impact within the unit despite only passing for duty six months ago, having trained to join the marines as a commissioned officer. His parents, Jane and Sean, said he was “a much loved and cherished son”. “His warmth and humour lit a room and infected all around him,” they said. “He dealt with people in a thoughtful and compassionate way. His independence and sense of adventure meant that he embraced life and his chosen path.” Augustin also leaves behind a sister, Sarah. Murchison described him as an “inspirational, passionate and selfless” leader. Military Afghanistan Haroon Siddique guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ratko Mladic denies ordering Srebrenica massacre, says his son

Darko Mladic makes claim as his father fights extradition from Serbia to face UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague Ratko Mladic denies ordering the 1995 massacre of 8,000 Muslim men and boys in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica, his son has said. “Whatever was done in Srebrenica, he has nothing to do with it. His orders were to evacuate the wounded, the women and the children and then the fighters,” Darko Mladic said as his father fought extradition from Serbia to face the UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague. “Whatever was done behind his back, he has nothing to do with that.” The family intends to demand on Mondaythat a Serbian court orders an independent medical checkup to counter Friday’s decision that Mladic is fit to stand trial . “His basic human rights are being violated,” his son said. Prosecutors have dismissed such moves as a delaying tactic. Ratko Mladic’s lawyer, Milos Saljic, said: “It is impossible to talk to him sensibly about usual things, to talk about his defense case … He is really in bad shape psychologically.” The alleged war criminal, who has previously suffered at least two minor strokes, also said he wanted to be visit the grave of his daughter, who killed herself in 1994. “He says if he can’t go there, he wants his daughter’s coffin brought in here,” Saljic added. “His condition is alarming.” Meanwhile, Serbian authorities stepped up security ahead of an ultra-nationalist rally scheduled to take place in the capital, Belgrade, later on Sunday. Previous rallies have resulted in violent clashes between the police and rightwing extremists. Earlier, it emerged that officials involved in Mladic’s capture had faced a tirade of abuse when he was brought to court. Mladic accused them of “working for the CIA”, and later told one prominent official he could have had him killed on two occasions. Mladic, who has refused to recognise the authority of the war crimes tribunal in The Hague, denied being a killer, adding that all Serbs bore a shared guilt for voting for President Slobodan Milosevic, the architect of the Balkan wars. Mladic’s behaviour since being brought to court in Belgrade was disclosed in the most detailed account yet of the state of mind of the man charged with orchestrating the Srebrenica massacre and the siege of Sarajevo during the Bosnian war. It came as a source close to Serbia’s intelligence service, the BIA – or Security Information Agency – said Mladic had been living openly for several years, although “not continuously”, in the village of Lazarevo, where he was found. A BIA team observing the house of his cousin Branko Mladic, where Ratko Mladic was found – one of two addresses he had been using in the area – had watched him going about “everyday activities”, including attending village celebrations. “Personally speaking, I think some officials knew where he was living,” the source said. “It was peculiar, too, that when the house was raided there were no personal possessions there.” Bruno Vekaric, a deputy prosecutor at the war crimes prosecutor’s office, who has met Mladic twice since his arrest, described Mladic’s behaviour: “He was really angry at first. He recognised me from television and said: ‘You’re in the CIA!’ He knew my name and asked me: ‘Are you a Serb?’ You know, because it is not a common Serbian name. “I told him my father was from Dubrovnik [in Croatia]. He felt like a great Serb and was angry at the way he was being treated on that first day.” Vekaric added that examination of Mladic by court-appointed medical experts confirmed he had suffered at least two minor strokes, perhaps more, but was coherent and fit to stand trial. That was confirmed by Mladic’s wife, Bosiljka, speaking after visiting him, who said he had suffered a stroke in 2008. “He was stubborn and resistant. He did not want to co-operate with the judge at all on the first day,” Vekaric said. “He spoke about his career. And what was interesting, on that first day, was that he said to me: ‘Bruno, I am not a killer. But the people who killed, they should be held responsible.’” Vekaric gave his account in his court office above the cells where Mladic is being held in a block on his own, watched 24 hours a day by two guards through an open door. He said: “He’s always observed, but he’s told the guards: ‘You don’t have to worry. I’m not going to commit suicide.’” Mladic emerges as a man who has a desperate need to explain himself. “He needs to speak. To communicate,” said Vekaric. “He was alone for so long, he needs to speak.” Although they had never met before, Mladic made clear to Vekaric that he had followed his statements over the years on television. “The first day, he was very tired,” Vekaric said. “He was stressed and aggressive. The second time I saw him in court, he apologised to me for his outburst.” What has been visible since then is a more familiar Mladic, arrogant and demanding, insisting not only on his own innocence but on the shared guilt of all of the Serbian people. “He said: ‘You elected [Slobodan] Milosevic, not me. You are all guilty, not me.’” During his time in court, speaking to officials involved in proceedings to extradite him to The Hague for trial, some details have emerged of how Mladic has lived. He has had no mobile phone, not trusting mobiles or the internet. The television channels he watched were local Serbian ones, and he described cable television as “fed by the CIA”. Mladic also complained about how his family has been treated during the long manhunt. “He asked for his pension [cut off in 2004] to be reinstated. He said: ‘You destroyed everything. Because of you my daughter-in-law lost her job. They destroyed the financial connections of my son, Darko’” Vekaric said. He added that as well as asking for strawberries and a television, which has been delivered to his cell, Mladic had also asked if he could see his grandchildren. Vekaric said Mladic had suffered increasingly straitened circumstances since 2006, when he narrowly evaded arrest in the village of Ljuba. This was as a result of the targeting of those in his support network, including financiers, and increased supervision of family members, who had been followed closely by the BIA. “He only had relatives who could look after him,” said a source familiar with the BIA operation. “None of his close family visited him in Lazarevo while the house was being observed. They were being watched too closely.” Vekaric said: “When you see him, you see a man who has not looked after himself well in the last three to four years. He looks like someone who has not had proper medical attention in a long time.” Ratko Mladic Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovina Europe War crimes James Meikle Peter Beaumont guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
French minister resigns after being accused of sexual assault

Civil service minister Georges Tron denies allegations made by two women who worked for him in Draveil, near Paris A French minister has resigned from Nicolas Sarkozy’s government after he was put under investigation for allegedly sexually assaulting two women who worked for him. The departure of the civil service minister, Georges Tron – who denies the allegations – was announced by the prime minister, François Fillon, on Sunday. French prosecutors have opened a preliminary investigation into the accusations of sexual aggression and rape against Tron, whose lawyer, Olivier Schnerb, described the women as “inveterate liars” and said the accusations were “pure defamation” and “balderdash”. It happened two weeks after the arrest of the Socialist presidential hopeful, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who is facing sexual assault charges in New York. Tron’s government position became untenable after the foreign minister, Alain Juppé, told a television programme that although he was “presumed innocent”, he should consider resigning because “government ministers had to be above all suspicion”. The two women, aged 34 and 36, have lodged complaints with the public prosecutor, claiming Tron assaulted them between 2007 and 2010 while they worked at the town hall in Draveil, south of Paris, where he is the mayor. They say they were encouraged to come forward after Strauss-Kahn’s arrest a fortnight ago. “When I see that a little chambermaid is capable of taking on Dominique Strauss-Kahn, I told myself I did not have the right to stay silent,” one of the women told a French newspaper. “Other women have perhaps suffered what I have suffered. I have to help them. We have to smash this omerta.” Last week a women’s association claimed one of the women had come forward in November last year with a “credible” complaint against Tron. In a statement, the European Association Against Violence Against Women at Work, said: “Her credibility is not in question from our point of view.” The 53-year-old Tron claims the women have a vendetta against him after being sacked from their jobs. “I am not naive – they are trying to echo an affair taking place the other side of the Atlantic,” he told Reuters last week. In an interview prior to his resignation, he said: “The accusations against me are fantasy” but added that he was thinking about resigning, saying: “I don’t want to become an embarrassment [to the government].” France Europe Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Malta votes yes to legalising divorce

Largely Catholic nation was last EU member to not allow divorce but country votes for change in law through referendum Malta has voted yes in a non-binding referendum on legalising divorce , the country’s prime minister, Lawrence Gonzi, has confirmed. Almost three-quarters of the electorate voted on Saturday on whether divorce should be introduced in Malta. A majority Catholic country, Malta is the only EU country not to allow divorce. Figures from the electoral commission late on Saturday out the turnout at 72%, according to The Times of Malta . “Even though the result is not what I wished for, now it is our duty to see that the will of the majority is respected,” Gonzi said in a televised speech on Sunday. Gonzi, who campaigned against the introduction of divorce, said it was now up to parliament to enact a law legalising the dissolution of marriage on the island. The influential Catholic church supported a no vote during the campaign. The leader of the yes movement, Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando, of the governing Nationalist party, said the result was significant. “It brings Malta into a new era where the state and the church are separate,” he told the EFE news agency. Chile was the last country to legalise divorce in 2004 after overwhelming public pressure. Maltese voters were asked whether parliament should introduce a new law that would allow couples to obtain a divorce after four years of separation. Previously, couples could apply for a legal separation through the courts, or seek a church annulment – a complex process that can take up to nine years. A third option was to get divorced abroad, which would be recognised as valid in Malta. Malta Divorce David Sharrock guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Twitter unmasks anonymous British user in landmark legal battle

California court forces site to reveal personal details of user accused of libelling local authority in north-east England Twitter has been forced to hand over the personal details of a British user in a libel battle that could have huge implications for free speech on the web. The social network has passed the name, email address and telephone number of a south Tyneside councillor accused of libelling the local authority via a series of anonymous Twitter accounts. South Tyneside council took the legal fight to the superior court of California, which ordered San Francisco-based Twitter to hand over the user’s private details. It is believed to be the first time Twitter has bowed to legal pressure to unmask anonymous users and comes amid a huge row over privacy and free speech online. Ryan Giggs, the Manchester United footballer named as being behind a gagging order preventing reporting of his alleged affair with a reality TV model, is separately attempting to unmask Twitter users accused of revealing details of his high-profile privacy injunction. However, Giggs brought the lawsuit at the high court in London and the move to use California courts is likely to be seen as a landmark moment in the internet privacy battle. Ahmed Khan, the south Tyneside councillor accused of being the author of the pseudonymous Twitter accounts, described the council’s move as “Orwellian”. Khan received an email from Twitter earlier this month informing him that the site had handed over his personal information. He denies being the author of the allegedly defamatory material. “It is like something out of 1984,” Khan told the Guardian. “If a council can take this kind of action against one of its own councillors simply because they don’t like what I say, what hope is there for freedom of speech or privacy?” Khan said the information Twitter handed over was “just a great long list of numbers”. The subpeona, submitted by the council last month, ordered Twitter to hand over 30 pieces of information relating to several Twitter accounts, including @fatcouncillor and @ahmedkhan01 . “I don’t fully understand it but it all relates to my Twitter account and it not only breaches my human rights, but it potentially breaches the human rights of anyone who has ever sent me a message on Twitter. “A number of whistleblowers have sent me private messages, exposing any wrongdoing in the council, and the authority knows this.” He added: “I was never even told they were taking this case to court in California. The first I heard was when Twitter contacted me. I had just 14 days to defend the case and I was expected to fly 6,000 miles and hire my own lawyer – all at my expense. “Even if they unmask this blogger, what does the council hope to achieve ? The person or persons concerned is simply likely to declare bankruptcy and the council won’t recover any money it has spent.” A spokesman for south Tyneside council said that the legal action was brought by the authority’s previous chief executive, but that it has “continued with the full support” of the current head. He added: “The council has a duty of care to protect its employees and as this blog contains damaging claims about council officers, legal action is being taken to identify those responsible.” Twitter had not returned a request to comment at time of publication. Twitter Internet Blogging Privacy United States Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Twitter unmasks anonymous British user in landmark legal battle

California court forces site to reveal personal details of user accused of libelling local authority in north-east England Twitter has been forced to hand over the personal details of a British user in a libel battle that could have huge implications for free speech on the web. The social network has passed the name, email address and telephone number of a south Tyneside councillor accused of libelling the local authority via a series of anonymous Twitter accounts. South Tyneside council took the legal fight to the superior court of California, which ordered San Francisco-based Twitter to hand over the user’s private details. It is believed to be the first time Twitter has bowed to legal pressure to unmask anonymous users and comes amid a huge row over privacy and free speech online. Ryan Giggs, the Manchester United footballer named as being behind a gagging order preventing reporting of his alleged affair with a reality TV model, is separately attempting to unmask Twitter users accused of revealing details of his high-profile privacy injunction. However, Giggs brought the lawsuit at the high court in London and the move to use California courts is likely to be seen as a landmark moment in the internet privacy battle. Ahmed Khan, the south Tyneside councillor accused of being the author of the pseudonymous Twitter accounts, described the council’s move as “Orwellian”. Khan received an email from Twitter earlier this month informing him that the site had handed over his personal information. He denies being the author of the allegedly defamatory material. “It is like something out of 1984,” Khan told the Guardian. “If a council can take this kind of action against one of its own councillors simply because they don’t like what I say, what hope is there for freedom of speech or privacy?” Khan said the information Twitter handed over was “just a great long list of numbers”. The subpeona, submitted by the council last month, ordered Twitter to hand over 30 pieces of information relating to several Twitter accounts, including @fatcouncillor and @ahmedkhan01 . “I don’t fully understand it but it all relates to my Twitter account and it not only breaches my human rights, but it potentially breaches the human rights of anyone who has ever sent me a message on Twitter. “A number of whistleblowers have sent me private messages, exposing any wrongdoing in the council, and the authority knows this.” He added: “I was never even told they were taking this case to court in California. The first I heard was when Twitter contacted me. I had just 14 days to defend the case and I was expected to fly 6,000 miles and hire my own lawyer – all at my expense. “Even if they unmask this blogger, what does the council hope to achieve ? The person or persons concerned is simply likely to declare bankruptcy and the council won’t recover any money it has spent.” A spokesman for south Tyneside council said that the legal action was brought by the authority’s previous chief executive, but that it has “continued with the full support” of the current head. He added: “The council has a duty of care to protect its employees and as this blog contains damaging claims about council officers, legal action is being taken to identify those responsible.” Twitter had not returned a request to comment at time of publication. Twitter Internet Blogging Privacy United States Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …