Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1312)
Barack Obama visits Joplin tornado scene

President described the scene as ‘heartbreaking’ and promised a ‘national response’ to the tornado that struck a week ago It was, said Barack Obama, the worst destruction he had ever seen. As the president flew over the small town of Joplin, Missouri, one of those travelling with him said it looked as if the heart of the city had been destroyed by a giant bulldozer cutting a swath nearly a mile wide. On the ground, Obama described the scene as “heartbreaking” and promised a “national response” to the tornado that struck a week ago, killing at least 139 people and leaving scores missing. More than 900 were injured. The president returned from his much heralded tour of Europe to pay a sobering visit to Joplin, a city of about 50,000 people which was hit by the deadliest tornado in the US in more than 60 years. His motorcade moved along a main street that one of those accompanying him described as looking as if it had been destroyed by a giant bulldozer. Most of the houses are reduced to debris. Trees were not only stripped of their branches but their bark, leaving unusually white wooden stumps. Obama stopped to talk to survivors who spoke of a miracle that they had survived when others had not. “Sorry for your loss,” he told an anguished woman, hugging her twice as they talked One of those the president spoke to was 85 year-old Hugh Hills who was holding a large American flag in front of his largely destroyed house on Kentucky avenue. Hills told Obama he had “just pulled my chicken pot pie out of the oven when I looked at the TV and it said the storm is coming. And then the TV cut off”. Hills said he hid in a cupboard while most of his house was destroyed around him. The president said afterwards that he had listened to “harrowing stories but also miraculous stories”. “Obviously, it is going to take years to build back,” he said. “This is just not your tragedy. This is a national tragedy, and that means there’s going to be a national response. “What I’ve been telling every family that I’ve met here is we’re going to be here long after the cameras leave. We are not going to stop until Joplin is fully back on its feet.” Natural disasters and extreme weather Barack Obama United States Missouri Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Barack Obama visits Joplin tornado scene

President described the scene as ‘heartbreaking’ and promised a ‘national response’ to the tornado that struck a week ago It was, said Barack Obama, the worst destruction he had ever seen. As the president flew over the small town of Joplin, Missouri, one of those travelling with him said it looked as if the heart of the city had been destroyed by a giant bulldozer cutting a swath nearly a mile wide. On the ground, Obama described the scene as “heartbreaking” and promised a “national response” to the tornado that struck a week ago, killing at least 139 people and leaving scores missing. More than 900 were injured. The president returned from his much heralded tour of Europe to pay a sobering visit to Joplin, a city of about 50,000 people which was hit by the deadliest tornado in the US in more than 60 years. His motorcade moved along a main street that one of those accompanying him described as looking as if it had been destroyed by a giant bulldozer. Most of the houses are reduced to debris. Trees were not only stripped of their branches but their bark, leaving unusually white wooden stumps. Obama stopped to talk to survivors who spoke of a miracle that they had survived when others had not. “Sorry for your loss,” he told an anguished woman, hugging her twice as they talked One of those the president spoke to was 85 year-old Hugh Hills who was holding a large American flag in front of his largely destroyed house on Kentucky avenue. Hills told Obama he had “just pulled my chicken pot pie out of the oven when I looked at the TV and it said the storm is coming. And then the TV cut off”. Hills said he hid in a cupboard while most of his house was destroyed around him. The president said afterwards that he had listened to “harrowing stories but also miraculous stories”. “Obviously, it is going to take years to build back,” he said. “This is just not your tragedy. This is a national tragedy, and that means there’s going to be a national response. “What I’ve been telling every family that I’ve met here is we’re going to be here long after the cameras leave. We are not going to stop until Joplin is fully back on its feet.” Natural disasters and extreme weather Barack Obama United States Missouri Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Gas grilling isn’t just lazy: “It’s nihilism in a tank, and it has to stop now,” writes Josh Ozersky in a passionate ode to charcoal grilling. His effusive Time column rhapsodizes about coal, elevating it to the level of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (“It shouldn’t require an…

Continue reading …

If Dominique Strauss-Kahn presided over a testosterone-fueled, gray-suit clad world of international finance, then it is perhaps no small irony that it’s poised to get a zebra-print breath of fresh air in the form of his likely successor. New York Times scribe Maureen Dowd writes a glowing profile of Christine…

Continue reading …
Syria offers to cooperate on nuclear inquiry

Offer comes as Assad’s government tries to suppress demonstrations inspired by the Arab spring movement Syria has offered to cooperate with a UN investigation into evidence that it tried to build a reactor that could have been used to make a nuclear weapon, it has been reported. For the past three years, the country has prevented inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency gaining access to the site at al-Kibar. The offer of cooperation comes as the government of President Bashar al-Assad is trying to suppress demonstrations inspired by the Arab spring democratic movement. A damning IAEA report last week on the suspect building, which was bombed by Israel in 2007, said the IAEA “assesses that the building destroyed … was a nuclear reactor”. This is a far stronger finding than previous reports, which simply registered unanswered questions about the site. Last week’s report also noted Syria’s lack of cooperation with the IAEA after an initial inspection found traces of man-made uranium, and gave details of an apparent attempt to conceal, dismantle and bury the remains of the building. The report prompted US-led calls for Syria to be referred to the UN security council. According to documents seen by the Associated Press, the IAEA chief, Yukiya Amano, reported on Friday that top Syrian nuclear officials had told him the previous day: “We are ready to fully cooperate with the agency.” Despite the offer, which some diplomats regard as a delaying tactic, the US will seek Syria’s referral to the security council when the IAEA’s governing board meets on 6 June. A US letter sent to IAEA board members on Friday, and obtained by AP with an attached copy of a draft resolution, said: “Such cooperation would indeed be welcome but would not have any bearing on the finding of non-compliance” by Syria of its obligations under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. The outcome of the IAEA’s vote on the US resolution is unclear, as the Syrian offer may persuade some members that a referral is not warranted. Syria Bashar Al-Assad Nuclear weapons Middle East Julian Borger guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
The ruined village Palestinians will never forget

The ruins of Lifta are the final remains of the Palestinian hamlets that fringed Jerusalem until 1948. Now plans to bulldoze them are causing outrage In the soft golden light of a late spring evening, as yellow flowers are beginning to bloom on giant cacti, Yacoub Odeh climbs up through knee-high grass to the ruin that was his childhood home. For a man in his eighth decade, he is surprisingly nimble as he navigates ancient stones that litter the ground. But behind his light step is the weight of painful memories of a lost youth and a fading history. “Here is my house,” he says, sitting on the remains of a stone wall in whose crevices wild flowers and saplings cling. “Now only the corners remain. Here is the taboun [outdoor oven] where my mother used to bake bread. The smell!” With distant eyes, he describes an idyllic childhood in a place he calls paradise, where families helped one another and children played freely amid almond and fig trees and on the rocks around the village’s natural spring. The place is Lifta , an Arab village on the north-western fringes of Jerusalem, for centuries a prosperous, bustling community built around agriculture, traditional embroidery, trade and mutual support. But since 1948, shortly before the state of Israel was declared, it has been deserted. The population, according to the Palestinian narrative of that momentous year, was expelled by advancing Jewish soldiers; the people abandoned their homes, say the Israeli history books. Lifta was one of hundreds of Arab villages taken over by the embryonic Jewish state. But it is the only one not to have been subsequently covered in the concrete and tarmac of Israeli towns and roads, or planted over with trees and shrubs to create forests, parks and picnic areas, or transformed into Israeli artists’ colonies. Some argue that Israel set out to erase any vestige of Palestinian roots in the new country. Now, 63 years on, the ruins of Lifta are finally facing the threat of bulldozers and concrete mixers . A long-term proposal to sell the state-owned land for the construction of luxury housing units and a boutique hotel on the site is awaiting the authorities’ final approval. It has caused a furore. Opponents of the plan include those who believe Lifta should be preserved as a monument to history; those who want to retain its charming environs as a rambling spot; and those – Odeh among them – who insist that one day they will return and reclaim their homes. For many Palestinians, Lifta is a symbol of the Nakba , literally the “catastrophe”, of 1948 in which 700,000 people were dispossessed. It embodies their longing for their land, and their bitterness at their continued refugee status. It is, wrote Palestinian author Ghada Karmi in a letter to the Los Angeles Times, “a physical memory of injustice and survival”. The development plan was approved by the Jerusalem municipality five years ago, but earlier this year the Israel Lands Administration – the state agency that took ownership of Lifta’s land under the Israeli law governing property deemed to be abandoned – began marketing the plot to private developers. A legal challenge stayed the tender process, but a decision is due any day on whether to proceed. The proposal is for 212 luxury housing units, expected to be advertised to wealthy expatriate Jews, a chic hotel and shops, and a museum. It suggests that some of the ruins be restored. But Lifta as a sanctuary and de facto heritage site will be lost . Shmuel Groag, one of the architects of the original proposal, has since reversed his position and has backed the campaign to preserve the ruined village. “I have changed my mind about conservation in general, and about Lifta in particular,” he says. The site, he argues, should be “frozen”. Others have appealed to Unesco to declare Lifta a world heritage site, saying that work must begin to halt further decay and the theft of valuable stones from the ruins. Alongside the ramblers, drug-users and illicit lovers frequent the ruins. Crowds of ultra-orthodox Jewish teenage boys, stripped to their underwear, swim in the spring, and light barbecues on the rocks. Graffiti scars many of the fragmented walls. For Odeh, this is distressing. “Why should they have free access to my home when I am stopped by security guards and questioned about my right to be here,” he asks. “When I see these people coming here, I feel sorrow and anger.” The remains of the village are bounded by roads, along which traffic rumbles to and from Tel Aviv and Jerusalem’s suburbs and settlements. On the ridge above Lifta, concrete mixers and diggers are at work on a high-speed rail link to Tel Aviv; deep in the valley below is a guarded complex, said to be the site of the Israeli government’s underground nuclear bunker. Out of sight of Lifta’s ruins, but built on its former farmlands are the Knesset (Israel’s parliament), the supreme court, the Hadassah hospital, the Hebrew University and the city’s central bus station. In 1948, the village owned 1,200 hectares but they have long gone, along with olive, fig, apricot, almond, plum, pomegranate and citrus trees plus the fields of spinach, cauliflower, peas and beans that gave Lifta its prosperity. “Life was rich,” recalls Odeh. “The spring watered the village gardens. We had more olives than we needed so we sold them and the oil in Jerusalem.” As we walk amid the ruins, Odeh points out the old landmarks. “Here was the mosque. This was the sheriff’s house. Here was the olive press. There is the house where I was born, and where my father was born. Over there is the cemetery. This was the sahn [courtyard] where people shared happy occasions and sorrowful occasions. Here I breathed my first breath. The first water I drank, I drank here.” It is painful, he says. He points out what is remaining of the beautiful architecture of the houses, with arched windows, columns and graceful balconies. Over a door, a lintel is inscribed with Arabic writing. Enter in safety, it says; the owner of this house is God. “The people of the village cut the stones and built their houses themselves. They were proud of that. They helped each other build and harvest the olives. The village lived as a family, one family.” But in 1948, when Odeh was eight years old, the bucolic life of Lifta came to an end. At the gateway to Jerusalem, Lifta was strategically important to the advancing Jewish troops. A series of violent skirmishes caused fear and panic, he recalls. There was firing and attacks from both sides. And then came the day his family left. “My mother was preparing a fire to warm the house. I was with my little brother. The gangs began to shoot in the direction of Lifta. My brother was shouting: ‘Mama! Mama! They’re shooting us.’ My mother took us inside and put us in a corner. The people of Lifta were crying to one another.” Odeh’s father, then 33, carried the youngest of the eight children, and the family crossed the valley and climbed up to the main road to Jerusalem. His mother took the key to the house but they left everything they owned. “We had nothing but the clothes we were wearing. We had everything – and in one moment we had nothing. We became beggars.” As the villagers left, Jewish soldiers blew holes in the roofs of the houses to make them uninhabitable. Odeh’s father stayed in Lifta for a few more days. After boarding a truck heading away from the village, the rest of the family slept under fig trees. They spent the following two years in Ramallah before moving to Jerusalem’s Old City. His father, a broken man, developed stomach problems and died at the age of 35. His mother suffered from asthma from the time she left Lifta until her death. Many of the 3,000 residents of Lifta scattered across the West Bank and beyond to Jordan, but a core still live in East Jerusalem within a few kilometres of their former homes. Odeh himself later joined the armed resistance against Israel and spent 17 years in prison. Now, in his twilight years, he is as impassioned as ever about his home. “We will never forget nor forgive the destruction of our village. Lifta is in our memory and in our history. It is our fathers’ and grandfathers’ graveyard. The spring, the trees, the land – we will never forget it.” He is unshakeable in his belief in the Palestinians’ right to return to their homes – something that cannot be countenanced by Israel because it would threaten the state’s Jewish majority and hence its Jewish nature. “We still dream of coming back,” says Odeh. “I’m sure the time will come to return to Lifta, to my home.” There can be no lasting peace until the refugee issue is resolved, he adds. But he knows time may be running out. “Lifta is an eyewitness to history, to what happened in the Nakba. If we can’t come back, then leave the village to this history.” Israel Middle East Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
The ruined village Palestinians will never forget

The ruins of Lifta are the final remains of the Palestinian hamlets that fringed Jerusalem until 1948. Now plans to bulldoze them are causing outrage In the soft golden light of a late spring evening, as yellow flowers are beginning to bloom on giant cacti, Yacoub Odeh climbs up through knee-high grass to the ruin that was his childhood home. For a man in his eighth decade, he is surprisingly nimble as he navigates ancient stones that litter the ground. But behind his light step is the weight of painful memories of a lost youth and a fading history. “Here is my house,” he says, sitting on the remains of a stone wall in whose crevices wild flowers and saplings cling. “Now only the corners remain. Here is the taboun [outdoor oven] where my mother used to bake bread. The smell!” With distant eyes, he describes an idyllic childhood in a place he calls paradise, where families helped one another and children played freely amid almond and fig trees and on the rocks around the village’s natural spring. The place is Lifta , an Arab village on the north-western fringes of Jerusalem, for centuries a prosperous, bustling community built around agriculture, traditional embroidery, trade and mutual support. But since 1948, shortly before the state of Israel was declared, it has been deserted. The population, according to the Palestinian narrative of that momentous year, was expelled by advancing Jewish soldiers; the people abandoned their homes, say the Israeli history books. Lifta was one of hundreds of Arab villages taken over by the embryonic Jewish state. But it is the only one not to have been subsequently covered in the concrete and tarmac of Israeli towns and roads, or planted over with trees and shrubs to create forests, parks and picnic areas, or transformed into Israeli artists’ colonies. Some argue that Israel set out to erase any vestige of Palestinian roots in the new country. Now, 63 years on, the ruins of Lifta are finally facing the threat of bulldozers and concrete mixers . A long-term proposal to sell the state-owned land for the construction of luxury housing units and a boutique hotel on the site is awaiting the authorities’ final approval. It has caused a furore. Opponents of the plan include those who believe Lifta should be preserved as a monument to history; those who want to retain its charming environs as a rambling spot; and those – Odeh among them – who insist that one day they will return and reclaim their homes. For many Palestinians, Lifta is a symbol of the Nakba , literally the “catastrophe”, of 1948 in which 700,000 people were dispossessed. It embodies their longing for their land, and their bitterness at their continued refugee status. It is, wrote Palestinian author Ghada Karmi in a letter to the Los Angeles Times, “a physical memory of injustice and survival”. The development plan was approved by the Jerusalem municipality five years ago, but earlier this year the Israel Lands Administration – the state agency that took ownership of Lifta’s land under the Israeli law governing property deemed to be abandoned – began marketing the plot to private developers. A legal challenge stayed the tender process, but a decision is due any day on whether to proceed. The proposal is for 212 luxury housing units, expected to be advertised to wealthy expatriate Jews, a chic hotel and shops, and a museum. It suggests that some of the ruins be restored. But Lifta as a sanctuary and de facto heritage site will be lost . Shmuel Groag, one of the architects of the original proposal, has since reversed his position and has backed the campaign to preserve the ruined village. “I have changed my mind about conservation in general, and about Lifta in particular,” he says. The site, he argues, should be “frozen”. Others have appealed to Unesco to declare Lifta a world heritage site, saying that work must begin to halt further decay and the theft of valuable stones from the ruins. Alongside the ramblers, drug-users and illicit lovers frequent the ruins. Crowds of ultra-orthodox Jewish teenage boys, stripped to their underwear, swim in the spring, and light barbecues on the rocks. Graffiti scars many of the fragmented walls. For Odeh, this is distressing. “Why should they have free access to my home when I am stopped by security guards and questioned about my right to be here,” he asks. “When I see these people coming here, I feel sorrow and anger.” The remains of the village are bounded by roads, along which traffic rumbles to and from Tel Aviv and Jerusalem’s suburbs and settlements. On the ridge above Lifta, concrete mixers and diggers are at work on a high-speed rail link to Tel Aviv; deep in the valley below is a guarded complex, said to be the site of the Israeli government’s underground nuclear bunker. Out of sight of Lifta’s ruins, but built on its former farmlands are the Knesset (Israel’s parliament), the supreme court, the Hadassah hospital, the Hebrew University and the city’s central bus station. In 1948, the village owned 1,200 hectares but they have long gone, along with olive, fig, apricot, almond, plum, pomegranate and citrus trees plus the fields of spinach, cauliflower, peas and beans that gave Lifta its prosperity. “Life was rich,” recalls Odeh. “The spring watered the village gardens. We had more olives than we needed so we sold them and the oil in Jerusalem.” As we walk amid the ruins, Odeh points out the old landmarks. “Here was the mosque. This was the sheriff’s house. Here was the olive press. There is the house where I was born, and where my father was born. Over there is the cemetery. This was the sahn [courtyard] where people shared happy occasions and sorrowful occasions. Here I breathed my first breath. The first water I drank, I drank here.” It is painful, he says. He points out what is remaining of the beautiful architecture of the houses, with arched windows, columns and graceful balconies. Over a door, a lintel is inscribed with Arabic writing. Enter in safety, it says; the owner of this house is God. “The people of the village cut the stones and built their houses themselves. They were proud of that. They helped each other build and harvest the olives. The village lived as a family, one family.” But in 1948, when Odeh was eight years old, the bucolic life of Lifta came to an end. At the gateway to Jerusalem, Lifta was strategically important to the advancing Jewish troops. A series of violent skirmishes caused fear and panic, he recalls. There was firing and attacks from both sides. And then came the day his family left. “My mother was preparing a fire to warm the house. I was with my little brother. The gangs began to shoot in the direction of Lifta. My brother was shouting: ‘Mama! Mama! They’re shooting us.’ My mother took us inside and put us in a corner. The people of Lifta were crying to one another.” Odeh’s father, then 33, carried the youngest of the eight children, and the family crossed the valley and climbed up to the main road to Jerusalem. His mother took the key to the house but they left everything they owned. “We had nothing but the clothes we were wearing. We had everything – and in one moment we had nothing. We became beggars.” As the villagers left, Jewish soldiers blew holes in the roofs of the houses to make them uninhabitable. Odeh’s father stayed in Lifta for a few more days. After boarding a truck heading away from the village, the rest of the family slept under fig trees. They spent the following two years in Ramallah before moving to Jerusalem’s Old City. His father, a broken man, developed stomach problems and died at the age of 35. His mother suffered from asthma from the time she left Lifta until her death. Many of the 3,000 residents of Lifta scattered across the West Bank and beyond to Jordan, but a core still live in East Jerusalem within a few kilometres of their former homes. Odeh himself later joined the armed resistance against Israel and spent 17 years in prison. Now, in his twilight years, he is as impassioned as ever about his home. “We will never forget nor forgive the destruction of our village. Lifta is in our memory and in our history. It is our fathers’ and grandfathers’ graveyard. The spring, the trees, the land – we will never forget it.” He is unshakeable in his belief in the Palestinians’ right to return to their homes – something that cannot be countenanced by Israel because it would threaten the state’s Jewish majority and hence its Jewish nature. “We still dream of coming back,” says Odeh. “I’m sure the time will come to return to Lifta, to my home.” There can be no lasting peace until the refugee issue is resolved, he adds. But he knows time may be running out. “Lifta is an eyewitness to history, to what happened in the Nakba. If we can’t come back, then leave the village to this history.” Israel Middle East Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Mitch Daniels thinks his chances of unseating President Obama would have been pretty good, had he decided to enter the 2012 race: “Yeah, I think so,” he replied when asked if he could have won. “I mean no one can know.” But he emphasized that his decision to stay on…

Continue reading …

A coastal Yemen town appears to have fallen completely to al-Qaeda, even as a tentative truce in capital Sanaa took hold, ending more than a week of streetfighting, reports Reuters. But the price was the fall of Zinjibar —which critics charge was a deliberate concession on the part of embattled…

Continue reading …
Sepp Blatter in the clear as top Fifa officials suspended

World football body under the glare of global scrutiny as two senior officials suspended over corruption allegations Fifa, the world governing body of football, was writhing under the glare of global scrutiny as two of its most senior officials were suspended over corruption allegations while its president, Sepp Blatter, was cleared to stand unopposed in the organisation’s presidential elections. Mohamed Bin Hammam, Qatari president of the Asian Football Confederation, was last week immersed in a promising campaign for election to the Fifa presidency. This morning, his football career is in tatters after Fifa’s ethics committee imposed a “temporary exclusion” from his football posts while it refers evidence to “forensic investigators”. Jack Warner, the controversial Fifa vice-president whom England 2018 accused of having pledged his vote only to switch it to Russia’s successful World Cup bid at the ballot box, has suffered a similar ban. A Trinidad & Tobago government minister, Warner was also the longest serving of Fifa’s vice-presidents. But claims that he was party to illegal payments made to members of the regional Caribbean Football Union gave Fifa’s ethics committee sufficient grounds to bring about his temporary suspension. Blatter, the incumbent president, had cause to smile despite the crisis engulfing his organisation. His coronation on Wednesday for a new four-year term is now assured. He was exonerated by the ethics committee of breaching his duty of disclosure of allegedly corrupt acts. “The Fifa ethics committee has reached its decisions,” he said in a statement. “I do not wish to comment in detail but simply to say that I regret what has happened in the last few days and weeks. Fifa’s image has suffered a great deal as a result, much to the disappointment of Fifa itself and all football fans.” Bin Hammam, who previously labelled the investigation into the allegations as a “tawdry manoeuvre” aimed at destabilising his election campaign, muttered still more darkly. “It is unfortunate but this is where we are,” he said. “This is Fifa.” After nearly 13 years as the president of Fifa, Blatter has in the eyes of many football fans come to personify all that is wrong with the world’s most popular sport. But at Fifa’s congress in Zurich on Wednesday he will be returned by acclamation. Acclaim, though, may be harder to find after an affair that has shot through the heart of Fifa. The politics of football have long been accompanied by a background hum of corruption claims, but in recent times it has become a cacophony. When asked if the reputation of Fifa was now at its lowest ebb, the general secretary of Fifa, Jérôme Valcke, who owes his place at the top table of the game to Blatter, said: “Maybe it’s not at the highest, that’s clear. It’s sad. Definitely there is a need for change. I’m not a Fifa president so he is the one who must decide what he wants to do and Fifa must make the necessary changes so that the institution has systems in place to avoid that something like this happens again.” Valcke talked of this being a watershed, of introducing new rules, but his words will ring hollow to many fans who will recall how often Fifa has been forced to respond to accusations of corruption. Last October, when confronted by accusations from the Sunday Times that several football officials had discussed inducements from World Cup bidders, Blatter said: “Our society is full of devils and these devils, you find them in football.” Within weeks, two of Fifa’s 24 most senior officials, executive committee members from Tahiti and Nigeria, were banned from all football activity for a year and three years respectively. They had allegedly solicited bribes in return for their votes in the World Cup host-nation decision. With those suspensions, Fifa considered the matter closed. Today’s events, which mean that four of Fifa’s 24-man ruling executive committee are currently serving bans or suspensions for allegedly corrupt activity, suggest it was not. The scale of the latest accusations have made this a compelling drama that has drawn the attention of the world’s politicians. Hugh Robertson, the UK sports minister, describing a “farce” at Fifa, believes its problems are systemic. “Sports governing bodies have to be transparent and accountable and change has to happen for the good of world football,” he said. “Fifa needs to urgently reform in the way that the IOC did after Salt Lake City.” Even some of football’s most senior political figures are beginning to question whether Fifa can survive in its current form. Michel Platini, the three-times former European footballer of the year, is now the president of Europe’s football confederation, Uefa, having spent years as a personal adviser to Blatter at Fifa. “I think that Fifa is like the International Olympic Committee was some years ago, I think we are at the end of a system based on politics,” Platini said. “The future of this big international sports company is owned by people who are specialists – not political people, like you have Juan Antonio Samaranch in the IOC, [Blatter's predecessor, Joao] Havelange, Blatter, who comes from politics, and you have many companies like that in sport. “I think it will finish in the next few years and we will have people from the sport. I think Fifa has to come back to football.” That will take four years at least, and long before then the din of corruption allegations may reverberate again. Even before the decision was handed down by Petrus Damaseb, a senior judge from Namibia who was chairing the ethics committee investigation, Warner had issued a message of menace for Fifa. “I tell you something, in the next couple days you will see a football tsunami that will hit Fifa and the world that will shock you,” he told the Trinidad Express. “The time has come when I must stop playing dead so you’ll see it, it’s coming, trust me you’ll see it by now and Monday. I have been here for 29 consecutive years and if the worst happen, the worst happen.” Sepp Blatter Fifa Jack Warner Mohamed bin Hammam Football politics Matt Scott guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …