Locals ban Adán Sarabia’s Los Gringos No Comen Llajua (Foreigners Don’t Eat Spicy Sauce) because it portrays them as narco-villains For a film-maker, getting lost in the jungle can be a source of amusing sketches, which can turn even more humorous if it’s a German tourist stumbling upon a makeshift cocaine lab run by fictional drug-traffickers. But coca growers in the Yungas region of Bolivia do not see the funny side. They have banned the screening of Adán Sarabia’s Los Gringos No Comen Llajua (Foreigners Don’t Eat Spicy Sauce) because it portrays them as narco-villains. In the movie, the German tourist is kidnapped by drug traffickers who believe he is worth a lot of money. It’s all fiction, says the Bolivian filmmaker, but the coca growers are not convinced. They have even intimidated those who try to show the film. “The house of one of the people who helped us was burnt down,” said Sarabia. “They’ve threatened the actors who live in the Yungas that they’ll throw them out of their community, and they’ve called them persona non grata.” The young director protests that his comedy, while filmed in the Yungas, could be set in any jungle area of Latin America. “I was surprised that one of the leaders of the coca growers wanted to know who gave us permission to film a cocaine lab,” said Sarabia. A scene in the movie shows mean-looking men stumping their feet on coca leaves, the traditional maceration process in the production of illegal cocaine. “This person believes that what he’s seen in the movie is true but, in reality, that cocaine lab was our artistic recreation.” For the director, this is not just laughable but also an implicit confirmation that some of the coca legally grown in the Yungas for traditional and medicinal uses goes to drug traffickers. “This comment implicates the coca growers, that they do have maceration pits,” said Savadria. “He put his foot in his mouth.” The director, however, is pleased about the controversy because it has given the film very good publicity. “We now plan to launch it again. People now want to see it.” Bolivia Comedy Drugs trade guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Harmondsworth under spotlight for holding detainees as long as three years at a cost of £110 a night, says IMB report Ministers have been warned by an official immigration watchdog of the “excessively long” periods, including cases of more than three years, that detainees are being held at Europe’s largest removal centre. A “snapshot” taken last December showed that 35 detainees at Harmondsworth removal centre, near Heathrow airport, had been waiting more than 12 months to be deported, including seven who had been waiting more than two years. Harmondsworth’s officially appointed independent monitoring board (IMB) said one man had been held in detention for three years and seven months at a cost of £110 a night. The bill is already more than £144,000. “This is not only emotionally costly to detainees but expensive for the taxpayer,” says the IMB’s annual report to the immigration minister, Damian Green. It adds that the latest national figures show that as of 3 March, 170 detainees around the country have been held more than two years waiting for their removal. The watchdog raises the problem of “hidden children” being held in immigration detention centres despite the coalition’s pledge to end the practice. The IMB’s annual report reveals that six children who were held last year at Harmondsworth were removed by social services when it had been established they were children. The watchdog said they were part of the problem of young people being detained by the UK Border Agency as adults despite claiming to be under 18. “Arrangements should be made for the rapid assessment of those claiming to be under 18,” the IMB reported. Harmondsworth, which is run by a US private security company, GEO, became the largest immigration detention centre in Europe last year when four prison-style wings were opened, trebling the total capacity to 615 people. The report was published as a freedom of information request revealed a surge of complaints last year against the security company G4S over its running of four immigration removal centres. In 2010 the company received 773 complaints from detainees – 240 more than the previous year. Nearly 130 of the complaints were fully or partially substantiated. Most concerned lost property, poor quality food or poor communication but 25 of the complaints that were substantiated involved the conduct of individual members of staff. They included two complaints of serious assault by staff on detainees at Harmondsworth and at Tinsley House, near Gatwick. A third case of assault at Harmondsworth is still being investigated. G4S lost the contract to carry out immigration deportations last year. A police investigation continues into the case of Jimmy Mubenga, an Angolan who died after being restrained by three G4S guards on a flight . A spokesman for G4S said: “Anyone detained within our immigration facilities is given every opportunity to raise concerns about either the treatment they receive from our staff or the services we provide. “The level of substantiated complaints against our employees over the last three years, at 25, is extremely low and of a minor nature, albeit we take each one very seriously. “The vast majority of upheld complaints relate to issues at Brook House IRC, which houses some of the UK’s most challenging detainees, including a number of convicted criminals, prior to their deportation.” David Wood, head of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said: “The way that complaints are processed and recorded has been made simpler in recent years, which has led to a rise in recording. “Complaints range from issues about the food served at mealtimes to more serious issues. Importantly these figures show a decrease in substantiated complaints and that the majority of complaints are minor and relate to availability of facilities at the centres.” Immigration and asylum Human rights Jimmy Mubenga Children Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Harmondsworth under spotlight for holding detainees as long as three years at a cost of £110 a night, says IMB report Ministers have been warned by an official immigration watchdog of the “excessively long” periods, including cases of more than three years, that detainees are being held at Europe’s largest removal centre. A “snapshot” taken last December showed that 35 detainees at Harmondsworth removal centre, near Heathrow airport, had been waiting more than 12 months to be deported, including seven who had been waiting more than two years. Harmondsworth’s officially appointed independent monitoring board (IMB) said one man had been held in detention for three years and seven months at a cost of £110 a night. The bill is already more than £144,000. “This is not only emotionally costly to detainees but expensive for the taxpayer,” says the IMB’s annual report to the immigration minister, Damian Green. It adds that the latest national figures show that as of 3 March, 170 detainees around the country have been held more than two years waiting for their removal. The watchdog raises the problem of “hidden children” being held in immigration detention centres despite the coalition’s pledge to end the practice. The IMB’s annual report reveals that six children who were held last year at Harmondsworth were removed by social services when it had been established they were children. The watchdog said they were part of the problem of young people being detained by the UK Border Agency as adults despite claiming to be under 18. “Arrangements should be made for the rapid assessment of those claiming to be under 18,” the IMB reported. Harmondsworth, which is run by a US private security company, GEO, became the largest immigration detention centre in Europe last year when four prison-style wings were opened, trebling the total capacity to 615 people. The report was published as a freedom of information request revealed a surge of complaints last year against the security company G4S over its running of four immigration removal centres. In 2010 the company received 773 complaints from detainees – 240 more than the previous year. Nearly 130 of the complaints were fully or partially substantiated. Most concerned lost property, poor quality food or poor communication but 25 of the complaints that were substantiated involved the conduct of individual members of staff. They included two complaints of serious assault by staff on detainees at Harmondsworth and at Tinsley House, near Gatwick. A third case of assault at Harmondsworth is still being investigated. G4S lost the contract to carry out immigration deportations last year. A police investigation continues into the case of Jimmy Mubenga, an Angolan who died after being restrained by three G4S guards on a flight . A spokesman for G4S said: “Anyone detained within our immigration facilities is given every opportunity to raise concerns about either the treatment they receive from our staff or the services we provide. “The level of substantiated complaints against our employees over the last three years, at 25, is extremely low and of a minor nature, albeit we take each one very seriously. “The vast majority of upheld complaints relate to issues at Brook House IRC, which houses some of the UK’s most challenging detainees, including a number of convicted criminals, prior to their deportation.” David Wood, head of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said: “The way that complaints are processed and recorded has been made simpler in recent years, which has led to a rise in recording. “Complaints range from issues about the food served at mealtimes to more serious issues. Importantly these figures show a decrease in substantiated complaints and that the majority of complaints are minor and relate to availability of facilities at the centres.” Immigration and asylum Human rights Jimmy Mubenga Children Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Harmondsworth under spotlight for holding detainees as long as three years at a cost of £110 a night, says IMB report Ministers have been warned by an official immigration watchdog of the “excessively long” periods, including cases of more than three years, that detainees are being held at Europe’s largest removal centre. A “snapshot” taken last December showed that 35 detainees at Harmondsworth removal centre, near Heathrow airport, had been waiting more than 12 months to be deported, including seven who had been waiting more than two years. Harmondsworth’s officially appointed independent monitoring board (IMB) said one man had been held in detention for three years and seven months at a cost of £110 a night. The bill is already more than £144,000. “This is not only emotionally costly to detainees but expensive for the taxpayer,” says the IMB’s annual report to the immigration minister, Damian Green. It adds that the latest national figures show that as of 3 March, 170 detainees around the country have been held more than two years waiting for their removal. The watchdog raises the problem of “hidden children” being held in immigration detention centres despite the coalition’s pledge to end the practice. The IMB’s annual report reveals that six children who were held last year at Harmondsworth were removed by social services when it had been established they were children. The watchdog said they were part of the problem of young people being detained by the UK Border Agency as adults despite claiming to be under 18. “Arrangements should be made for the rapid assessment of those claiming to be under 18,” the IMB reported. Harmondsworth, which is run by a US private security company, GEO, became the largest immigration detention centre in Europe last year when four prison-style wings were opened, trebling the total capacity to 615 people. The report was published as a freedom of information request revealed a surge of complaints last year against the security company G4S over its running of four immigration removal centres. In 2010 the company received 773 complaints from detainees – 240 more than the previous year. Nearly 130 of the complaints were fully or partially substantiated. Most concerned lost property, poor quality food or poor communication but 25 of the complaints that were substantiated involved the conduct of individual members of staff. They included two complaints of serious assault by staff on detainees at Harmondsworth and at Tinsley House, near Gatwick. A third case of assault at Harmondsworth is still being investigated. G4S lost the contract to carry out immigration deportations last year. A police investigation continues into the case of Jimmy Mubenga, an Angolan who died after being restrained by three G4S guards on a flight . A spokesman for G4S said: “Anyone detained within our immigration facilities is given every opportunity to raise concerns about either the treatment they receive from our staff or the services we provide. “The level of substantiated complaints against our employees over the last three years, at 25, is extremely low and of a minor nature, albeit we take each one very seriously. “The vast majority of upheld complaints relate to issues at Brook House IRC, which houses some of the UK’s most challenging detainees, including a number of convicted criminals, prior to their deportation.” David Wood, head of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said: “The way that complaints are processed and recorded has been made simpler in recent years, which has led to a rise in recording. “Complaints range from issues about the food served at mealtimes to more serious issues. Importantly these figures show a decrease in substantiated complaints and that the majority of complaints are minor and relate to availability of facilities at the centres.” Immigration and asylum Human rights Jimmy Mubenga Children Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A marijuana grower who shot dead one burglar and critically injured another won’t be facing any charges at this time, say Colorado cops. Karen Cordova, 48, shot one burglar to death and stabbed another after they broke into her home, where she grows medical marijuana, the Longmont Times-Call reports. One…
Continue reading …Water levels on 40 rivers, including the Yangtze, above safety limits as authorities warn of dykes and dams under pressure China has evacuated more than 500,000 people from deadly floods that are devastating areas in the south of the country following the worst drought in 50 years. At least 105 people have been swept to their deaths or killed in landslides and another 65 are missing after rivers burst their banks. The authorities have issued the highest level of alarm about dykes and dams under dangerous pressure. Television channels that were only recently broadcasting images of dried-up lake beds are now carrying footage of flooded homes and boats plying their way through inundated streets. China Daily said 550,000 people have been forced to leave their homes. The dramatic shift is in line with weather trends identified by the Beijing Climate Centre, which says rain is coming in shorter, fiercer bursts , interspersed by protracted periods of drought. The worst affected province is Zhejiang, where some stretches of the Qiantang river have risen to their highest level since 1955, according to the Flood Control and Drought Relief Office. In the Zhuji district, which has had 40.5cm of rain since the start of the month, the Puyang river inundated 88 villages and 13,000 hectares of crops. In neighbouring Jiangxi province, troops have helped 122,400 residents evacuate from vulnerable lowlands, according to the China News Service. Roads have been closed and bridges have collapsed in the floods, which have also affected Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan and Guizhou provinces. Monitoring stations on 40 rivers have recorded water levels above the safety limit, including Asia’s biggest waterway – the Yangtze – which is simultaneously suffering a flood downstream and a drought closer to its source. Meteorologists warned that the torrential downpours are forecast to move southwards or inland. Li Xiaoquan was quoted on China’s weather news website as saying that the rains were expected to affect Sichuan, Chongqing and Guangdong provinces before easing on Sunday. Additional reporting by Cecily Huang Flooding Natural disasters and extreme weather China Jonathan Watts guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Boy’s family wins case in high court against Harrow college that bans ‘gang-related’ hairstyles A school’s anti-gang ban on unconventional hairstyles has resulted in “unlawful, indirect racial discrimination which is not justified”, the high court has ruled. The test case decision is a victory for the family of African-Caribbean teenager “G”, who wears his hair in cornrow braids as part of a family tradition. G, who cannot be named, and his mother challenged a refusal by St Gregory’s Catholic Science College in Kenton, Harrow, north London, to let G through the school gates with his braids in September 2009, when he was 11. Mr Justice Collins, sitting in London, ruled that the hair policy was not unlawful in itself, “but if it is applied without any possibility of exception, such as G, then it is unlawful”. He said in future the school authorities must consider allowing other boys to wear cornrows if it is “a genuine family tradition based on cultural and social reasons”. Even though the family’s application for judicial review was successful, G, now 13, does not wish to return to the school, which he left in tears on his first day. “This is an important decision,” said G’s solicitor, Angela Jackman, after the hearing. “It makes clear that non-religious cultural and family practices associated with a particular race fall within the protection of equalities legislation.” The judge emphasised that the school’s “short back and sides” hair policy was perfectly permissible and lawful, but exceptions had to be made on ethnic and cultural grounds. He stressed that the school was “not in any way racist” but had made “an honest mistake” in failing to allow for exceptions, adding: “The school has had glowing Ofsted reports and there is no question that it is an excellent school.” The judge said headteacher Andrew Prindiville had justified the policy as necessary to stop the gang culture prevalent in the area, in which haircuts were used as badges of membership, coming into the school. Cornrows were not necessarily gang-linked but other styles, like the skinhead haircut, might well have that connection, the judge said. The fear was that allowing exceptions to the “short back and sides” rule would undermine the anti-gang policy. But the judge pointed out that exceptions were already made for Rastafarians and Sikh boys who wore hair beyond the collar, and similar exceptions should be made for African Caribbeans. The judge said G’s family was not alone in regarding cornrows as part of their culture: “There are, on the evidence, other African Caribbeans who take the same view.” The judge refused the head teacher and governors permission to appeal to the court of appeal, but they can still go to the appeal judge directly to ask them to consider the case. The judge stressed that he was not ruling on whether the exclusion of G in 2009 was unlawful. It had been suggested that G’s family might bring a county court damages action over the case. That would be the time to decide whether or not the school had dealt with G’s desire to wear cornrows in an unlawful manner, said the judge. Jackman said the judge had found the school’s policy unlawful as it applied to African Caribbean boys with G’s beliefs because it indirectly discriminated on race grounds. She added: “For G, wearing his hair in cornrows is a fundamental cultural practice which would have had no adverse impact upon the school. His wishes, however, were dismissed by the school without any consideration. Whilst schools face the challenges of maintaining good discipline, a community environment and their particular ethos, this case is a reminder that they must do so within the boundaries of the law.” Schools London guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The sun had barely risen over the aftermath of the Stanley Cup riot in Vancouver before the first of thousands of volunteers arrived to help clean up their city. People who arrived with gloves, brooms, and garbage bags said they wanted to do their part to restore Vancouver’s good name….
Continue reading …This is a tough time to be out of a job, and it’s never a good time to be a national laughingstock, so what now for Anthony Weiner? The congressman, who resigned yesterday , has held elected office since 1991, but the chances of him getting another job in politics any…
Continue reading …• Champions play Spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea in first five games • Kenny Dalglish unhappy with timing of opening games • Click here for the full list of Premier League fixtures Manchester United face a testing start to their defence of their Premier League title with an opening day fixture at West Bromwich on 13 August, followed by home games against Tottenham and Arsenal. Sir Alex Ferguson’s side then travel to Bolton in early September before another tough game against Chelsea at Old Trafford – their third game against a top-six side in their opening five matches. Arsenal too have a tricky opening, starting at Newcastle – a game in which they blew a four-goal lead last season – followed by a home match against Liverpool and an away trip to Manchester United. Chelsea and Manchester City appear to have slightly more straightforward starts. Chelsea travel to Stoke on the opening day before taking on West Bromwich and Norwich at Stamford Bridge, while Manchester City begin at home to Swansea, followed by games against Bolton, Tottenham, Wigan and Fulham. Of the other Premier League newcomers, QPR open with a home match against Bolton, while Norwich travel to Wigan. Liverpool, meanwhile, start their campaign at home to Sunderland – which means Jordan Henderson may get an immediate match against the team he played for prior to his move to Anfield. Sunderland then face Newcastle the following weekend. Tottenham and Everton meet at White Hart Lane, Fulham and Aston Villa face each other at Craven Cottage, while Blackburn host Wolves. The games will kick-off less than 72 hours after many players will have competed in a host of friendlies, including England versus Holland at Wembley. Liverpool’s manager Kenny Dalglish said he believes it would have made more sense to put back the start of the season by a day, although that would have impacted on television coverage. “There’s not a lot you can say about the fixture list really but I would ask why the season is starting on a Saturday when there are international friendlies the midweek before,” he told the club’s website. “Clubs are doing their best to bring in good players and that usually means they are international players. There is a free week after the first weekend so I don’t understand why we can’t start the season on a Sunday to prevent players having to travel back on a Wednesday night in time for a Saturday start. “If you are going to have international games then have them, but surely it makes sense to put the league games back a day if it’s possible. To me it’s common sense.” Premier League Football fixtures 2011-12 Manchester United Sean Ingle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …