Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 966)
Haley Barbour Urges Conservatives at Reed Event Not to Hold 2012 Presidential Candidates to Purity Test

Click here to view this media Haley Barbour potentially did not make himself a whole lot of friends at Ralph Reed’s event, the Faith & Freedom Conference this week where just about every leader in the Republican Party came to kiss the boots of someone as I’ve said already , I don’t understand why is not in prison. Barbour who’s been a long time GOP operative and corporate lobbyist urged the crowd there not do hold whoever ends up winning their nomination for president to a purity test. Here’s more from TPM — Haley Barbour: Don’t Hold GOP 2012 Candidates To Purity Test — Even On Taxes : Speaking at the Faith & Freedom Conference in Washington, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour warned Republican voters on Friday that they could not afford to apply strict purity tests to their presidential candidates, many of whom have raised hackles in conservative circles for various departures from the party line. Wading into very dangerous waters, he told reporters that even increasing taxes — the ultimate Republican heresy — should not be a dealbreaker. Speaking at the Faith & Freedom Conference in Washington, Barbour told the audience of social conservatives that they “can’t expert [the nominee] to be pure.” “Winning is about us sticking together to achieve the main thing,” he said. “Odds are, whoever you choose is not going to win the nomination, there’s so many of them. I’m going to fight for my person, but when its over I’m going to support the person that’s going to beat Barack Obama.” He repeated the message to reporters afterwards and praised the Tea Party movement for following his advice by working largely within the GOP. “If you had to agree with Haley Barbour on every issue it would be a mighty small party,” he said. “That’s just a fact, and we need people to understand that at the end of the day, Reagan was right. A person who agrees with you 80% of the time is your friend and ally, not some 20% traitor.” Read on…

Continue reading …
Mel Gibson: saint and sinner

On the eve of his movie comeback, can Mel Gibson finally tame his demons? It was a balmy spring evening in Cannes. Arriving for the premiere of his latest film, The Beaver , Mel Gibson seemed anxious as he walked the red carpet last month, a little uncomfortable posing for the massed ranks of photographers who were shouting his name. When the movie’s director, Jodie Foster, leaned across to adjust his bow-tie, Gibson smiled, right on cue. But while the two of them chatted and laughed for the cameras, the actor’s brow remained furrowed. The next day’s photographs would all show the three deep wrinkles cut horizontally across his tanned forehead, giving him the air of someone who expects disappointment and – more often than not – is rewarded with it. He was understandably worried, perhaps, about how the film would be received. The Beaver , in which the 55-year-old Gibson plays a depressed chief executive who communicates with his family through a glove puppet, is the first movie he has made since his inglorious public meltdown. Last July, Gibson became involved in a toxic public battle with his ex-girlfriend and the mother of his youngest child, the Russian musician Oksana Grigorieva. Audiotapes leaked to an American gossip website purportedly recorded Gibson directing a series of aggressively foul-mouthed rants at Grigorieva, slinging racist and misogynist abuse at her. “You look like a fucking bitch in heat,” he shouted, his words slurred and imprecise. “And if you get raped by a pack of niggers, it will be your fault.” It was not the first time that Gibson’s temper and unreconstructed world view had been unpleasantly aired in public. In 2006, he was stopped for speeding by a police officer in Malibu. Gibson, who has a history of alcoholism, was driving with an open bottle of tequila in his car. His blood-alcohol level exceeded the legal limit. As Gibson was handcuffed and put in the back of the police car, he launched into an unprovoked, antisemitic tirade in which he claimed that “the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world”. A subsequent mugshot, released to the media, showed Gibson peering up at the camera with untidily gelled hair, unfocused eyes and an inane smile on his face, as though, even in police custody, the only role he knew how to play was that of the famous heart-throb who could get away with it. As it turned out, he couldn’t. Hollywood retribution to these two incidents was swift. After the first outburst, one studio boss suggested an industry boycott, the comedian Rob Schneider took out a full-page advertisement in Variety stating that he would “never work with Mel Gibson-actor-director-producer and antisemite”, while a mini-series on the Holocaust that Gibson had been developing with the ABC network was dropped. After the second outburst, a cameo part that Gibson had been slated to play in The Hangover II was withdrawn when cast members complained. It was an embarrassing fall from grace for the man who, at the pinnacle of his fame, produced, directed and starred in Braveheart , winning two Oscars for his efforts. There was a tangible sense that, even if no one said it out loud, the once bankable Mel Gibson was now box-office poison. “Apparently, very few people saw this side to Mel all these years,” says Paul Sylbert, a renowned art director who worked with Gibson on the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory . “There have always been antisemites in Hollywood but they keep it more or less to themselves. They don’t get drunk and start shouting at a cop.” Sylbert, who is Jewish, nevertheless says he thought Gibson was “terrific” to work with: “I liked him immediately. He was funny, pleasant, always on time, serious as a worker and as much a part of the crew as it was possible to be. He was playful, funny, like a little child with lots of energy. You couldn’t not like him. At the wrap party, I remember him coming round with a box of cigars, a whole assortment, and he was saying to everybody, ‘Smoke one!’ He couldn’t have been nicer. “He fooled me completely. I don’t think he looked at me as a Jew. I don’t think it entered his head. I think a lot of people like me were baffled by what happened.” Back in Cannes, Gibson was right to be worried about how his new film would be received by the audience. In the event, any fears were to prove groundless. As the credits rolled, the crowd gave The Beaver a 10-minute standing ovation. “The applause went on for so long, I actually began to feel uncomfortable,” says one of Gibson’s entourage. “It just wasn’t ending.” The day after the screening, any lingering interest over Gibson’s past misdemeanours was overshadowed by the Danish director Lars Von Trier claiming to be a Nazi at a press conference. The ensuing scandal conveniently shifted the limelight away from Gibson’s personal life. The Beaver has so far had a muted reception in the States. The reviews, too, have been distinctly mixed. Peter Bradshaw, the Guardian film critic, called it “laborious” and noted that Gibson failed to “project an underlying sympathy or charm in his character”. But Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times hailed it as “a reminder that [Gibson] is, after all, a superb actor”. Can Gibson make a comeback from the depths of public ignominy? “Yes,” says the film historian Peter Biskind. “Practically anybody in America can make a comeback [but] I don’t think The Beaver is going to be the film that does it.” For Biskind, Gibson’s volatility is what makes him “a great actor”. “There’s nothing new about that – most movie stars write their own rules and get away with it.” Gibson has been writing his own rules for longer than most. This is the man who, after becoming one of the highest-grossing actors in Hollywood (his movies, including the hugely popular Mad Max and Lethal Weapon series, have earned more than £1.2bn worldwide), decided to pour several million dollars of his own money into directing a 125-minute film of the last 12 hours of the life of Jesus Christ. The Passion of the Christ , released in 2004, was told exclusively in Aramaic, Latin and Hebrew and contained graphic violence. A 56-year-old woman had a fatal heart attack while watching the crucifixion scene in a cinema in Wichita. In spite of the gory subject matter and allegations of antisemitism in Gibson’s handling of the part played by the Jews in Christ’s death, the film was an unexpected hit and was nominated for three Academy Awards. It made £300m at the box office and catapulted Gibson into the ranks of the movie industry super-rich (because he had his own production company, Icon, he kept control of the profits). His private life, too, seemed atypically stable by Hollywood standards. Gibson, a lifelong Catholic, had been married to Robyn Moore, a former dental nurse, since 1980. The couple had seven children and split their time between two houses in Malibu, an Australian ranch and a Connecticut mansion. For a while, he seemed untouchable. But, six years after The Passion of the Christ , his wife had left him, his former girlfriend had accused him of punching her in the face and he was being publicly reviled as a racist, drunken bigot. What makes a man, seemingly at the height of his creative powers and popular success, risk everything in such spectacular style? And which Mel Gibson are we to believe in – the fresh-faced movie idol who once commanded £10m a movie or the angry drunkard spewing out his spittle-fuelled invective? The answer, according to those who know him, is both. “It’s Jekyll and Hyde,” explains a friend and colleague. “He can be the nicest guy one day: funny, supportive, kind. The next he can be dark and difficult. It’s not a mood swing exactly; it’s more that he has these two distinct personalities and you’re never sure what you’re going to get. On a bad day, he can be depressed, almost bipolar, and he can lose his temper. But on a good day, I’m telling you, there’s no greater guy.” According to Benoît Debie, cinematographer on How I Spent My Summer Vacation which stars Gibson and will be released later this year: “Mel is very intense. He can be both ways. Sometimes, he’ll be very strong and difficult with the crew; sometimes, he can be very nice and kind as well. It’s like there are two polarities.” As an example, Debie points to the fact that the film’s director, Adrian Grunberg, was hand-picked for the project after the pair worked together on Apocalypto , a Mayan action-adventure set in the Mexican jungle which Gibson had directed, with Grunberg acting as his first assistant. “Mel told him, ‘Write a script, I can produce and will act in it and you can direct it,’” recalls Debie. “It was very generous of Mel Gibson to help this young director like that. But at the same time he was quite hard with Adrian on set. Mel could be quite intense with him and sometimes very difficult, a bit overbearing. When Mel was in shot, he liked the camera to see his face. He didn’t want to be in the dark because he’s a legend, a movie star. He’s a good guy but he’s troubled.” Almost everyone I speak to seems to have a similar take: his friends and associates see him as a complex man, riven by contradiction, with a dark edge. And yet, on set, he is also the person who likes to play practical jokes and to defuse tension by simulating farting noises. When Ivana Chubbuck, a Los Angeles-based acting coach, first met Gibson at an Oscars party 10 years ago the two of them “spent hours talking about no matter how dark or dramatic a role is, it also has to have a sense of humour”. Chubbuck, who now counts Gibson as a friend, adds: “The real point about Mel is that he’s got edge, but he’s got it with humour. He’s not afraid to be self-deprecating, but he’s a risk-taker too and that underlying danger makes him interesting.” Perhaps the most surprising admission among those who have worked closely with him through the years is that no one can remember a single incident where Gibson was racist, antisemitic or sexist. It is genuinely hard to find anyone with a bad word to say about him. The majority of people I speak to are utterly mystified by what happened and remain staunchly loyal. Danny Glover, his co-star in Lethal Weapon , has spoken out publicly in support of his friend – “I love Mel… [he's] a very generous man” – and has stated that Gibson made substantial financial donations to anti-apartheid charities in South Africa. Alan Nierob, Gibson’s publicist of 25 years, is Jewish, as is Richard Donner, the director of the Lethal Weapon films and one of Gibson’s closest allies. Jodie Foster, an atheist, recently defended him in Cannes, calling him ” the most loved actor in Hollywood “, and Gibson’s ex-wife, Robyn, issued a sworn declaration insisting that he had never hit her during their 28 years together and was “a wonderful and loving father”. He is capable of grandiose gestures of kindness. While filming How I Spent My Summer Vacation on location in a prison in Veracruz, Mexico, Gibson learned that an elderly Mexican extra was suffering from cancer. “Gibson found him an alternative cancer therapist in Arizona,” says Biskind, who was told the story by a crew member. “He got him a visa by writing to the American ambassador and then flew him there. And this guy was Jewish! The director, Adrian Grunberg, is also Jewish. It just doesn’t compute.” “I’ve never seen him be antisemitic or racist, not at all,” says Kim Winther, who was first assistant director on The Patriot and We Were Soldiers , both of which Gibson starred in. “I never saw him lose his temper, not once. I wouldn’t even know what that’s like. He was always wonderful, open and great with my wife and kids.” Was Winther shocked when Gibson’s outbursts became public knowledge? “Yes. It was a shock to anybody that knew him.” Mel Gibson was born in 1956 in the industrial city of Peekskill, New York, the sixth of 11 children. His father, Hutton, was a railway brakeman until an injury forced him into early retirement. After appearing as a contestant on the American game show, Jeopardy! , Hutton won $21,000 and used the money to emigrate with his family to Australia in 1968, when Mel was 12. A zealous Catholic, Hutton Gibson went on to found the Alliance for Catholic Tradition, a group which issued several polemics in print, condemning the modernising influence of the Second Vatican Council. Over the years, Hutton has been quoted in the media making outspoken and frequently offensive religious statements – criticising the Pope for being too liberal, insisting heretics should be burned at the stake “as an act of charity”, and declaring that the Holocaust was mostly “fiction”. His son has refused to distance himself publicly from his father’s comments. According to Biskind, it is no coincidence that many of Gibson’s films “have an ongoing theme about an authority figure he’s rebelling against or who is his mentor”. Paul Sylbert puts it this way: “I think the motives for Mel’s outbursts go a lot deeper than people realise. First of all, it’s the love of his father who poured all that crap into him.” Growing up, Gibson was indelibly influenced by his father’s beliefs. As an adolescent, he considered becoming a priest before one of his sisters applied on his behalf to the National Institute of Dramatic Arts at the University of New South Wales. Gibson got a place and shared digs with Geoffrey Rush. He never graduated, but he landed the lead role in Mad Max in 1979 and then, two years later, gave a critically acclaimed performance in Peter Weir’s Gallipoli . Shortly afterwards, following his marriage to Robyn, Gibson went to Hollywood to pursue his film career. Although Gibson had remained true to the Catholic faith of his upbringing, the fast-living, heady excesses of Los Angeles in the 1980s proved something of a challenge. He became known as a good-time guy with a quick temper who liked a few beers, an impression aided perhaps by the immense popularity of Martin Riggs, his mischievously irreverent alter ego in the Lethal Weapon franchise. “He’s a guy who, in a bar brawl, would be one of the people fighting,” an unnamed actor was quoted as saying in a People magazine article last year. It was clear that he struggled with fame. Interviewed by this newspaper several years ago, Gibson said of that time: “Your life takes a dramatic change and you do not know how to handle it. There is no academy, no university that teaches you how to be a celebrity.” Concerns about Gibson’s drinking started to emerge when, while filming in Canada in 1983, he hit a car while under the influence and was banned from driving in Ontario for three months. Richard Donner recently revealed that Gibson would “drink a six-pack of beer before he got to work”. He became a loose cannon on publicity junkets. In a now infamous exchange with the Spanish El Pais newspaper in 1991, Gibson made a series of inflammatory homophobic comments. “They take it up the ass,” he said, pointing to his own rear end. “This is only for taking a shit.” He later apologised, claiming he had been drunk on vodka at the time. And yet, like many alcoholics, his drunkenness through the years was spliced with long bouts of sobriety, lucidity and creative energy. It seemed as though he fell into a cycle of intense bouts of work, followed by a conspicuous fall off the wagon resulting in public embarrassment, private shame and a substantial drying-out period, supported by his long-suffering wife. “He sobered up periodically,” says Sylbert, “but you can’t be half an alcoholic.” When he was sober, Gibson was extremely generous towards other people he encountered who were also struggling with addiction. At a party in 2001, Ivana Chubbuck recalls Gibson looking after Robert Downey Jr, who was then recovering from years of substance abuse: “Mel was there sponsoring him, making sure he was staying sober. He always had one eye on him. He is a nurturing soul.” (In fact, at a time when no studio wanted to cast Downey Jr because of the astronomical insurance costs, Gibson put up his own money to ensure he was cast in The Singing Detective in 2003). Gibson also counselled Britney Spears at the height of her public breakdown. Nor were his attentions confined to the rich and famous; Chubbuck remembers Gibson offering his guest house free of charge to a homeless musician until he got back on his feet. “He’s a very loyal and tremendously thoughtful guy,” agrees Kim Winther. “He takes care of pretty much everyone but himself.” Although he might have presented his best side to his friends and colleagues, others found him far less congenial. In an interview with GQ earlier this year, Winona Ryder recalled crossing paths with a “really drunk” Gibson at a Hollywood party in the mid-90s. “I was with my friend who’s gay,” she said. “[Gibson] made a really horrible gay joke. And somehow it came up that I was Jewish. He said something about ‘oven dodgers’. I’d never heard that before. It was just this weird, weird moment. I was like, ‘He’s antisemitic and he’s homophobic.’ No one believed me!’” It was, in many ways, as though Gibson were living a double life: there was the highly controlled professional who was never late to work… and then there was the man who said awful, insulting things when under the influence. As Gibson started to take on more demanding directorial projects, requiring increasing amounts of time away from home, the two lives collided. And his family life, for so long a stabilising influence, began to buckle under the strain. When filming began on Apocalypto in 2005, Gibson was on location in the Mexican jungle near Veracruz during which time the set was battered by heavy rain and hurricanes, meaning that the original eight-week shooting period overran to nine months. He hit the bottle again. “I’ve spoken to people on that shoot and I know it was very difficult because of the alcohol he was drinking,” says Benoît Debie. On his return to Los Angeles, Gibson found that Robyn had moved out of their Malibu home with the children. Shortly afterwards, he made his drunken, antisemitic remarks to a police officer. Unsurprisingly, his friends seek to explain – if not excuse – his behaviour in this context. “It was a drunken outburst to an officer who basically stopped his party and also probably saved his life,” says one close friend. Sylbert adds: “I think what happened is that under severe pressure, with his wife leaving him, his alcohol problems came back. At that point, he was loaded up with all sorts of personal problems. In vino veritas, all this anger comes spewing out, and because he’s a right-wing Catholic who believes the Jews killed Christ, it’s directed at them.” His new relationship with Oksana Grigorieva, a pouting Russian pianist 14 years his junior, did little to help. From the start, Gibson’s friends were unsure of her motives, dismissing her as a golddigger. In 2009, he funded and produced a series of music videos for her. One close friend, who has known Gibson for over 20 years, says he was “not remotely surprised” when audiotapes of the couple’s rows were leaked. “You just have to look at who’s involved and the money she wanted to get out of him,” the friend says, referring to Grigorieva, with whom Gibson now has a one-year-old daughter. Grigorieva’s spokesman declined to comment. “I think it started to go wrong when he met Oksana,” says Chubbuck. “It’s a horrible thing to record someone without their knowledge and of course she sounds rational [on the recordings] because she’s the one with the tape on.” But surely the things Gibson said were indefensible, no matter what the provocation? “Well, if I think of some of the un-PC things I said in anger, especially when there’s children involved, then all bets are off,” counters Chubbuck. Whatever the truth behind those tapes (for a time, Gibson’s lawyers claimed they had proof the recordings had been edited), the ugly public spat with Grigorieva seems to be abating. Last month, she dropped her charges of domestic violence against him after Gibson entered what is known as a “West plea” that enables a case to be settled without the defendant admitting guilt. “I ended it for my children and my family,” Gibson said in an interview. “I’ll take the hit and move on.” The couple now share custody of their daughter, Lucia. “He remains extremely close with all his children,” says a good friend. “They have a great relationship and Robyn has also remained very loyal and supportive through this time. He’s been sober for a year now.” And he is still, as Sylbert points out, extremely rich. “Whatever the settlement with his ex [Grigorieva] will be, it won’t make a dent in it,” he says. “He’s made oodles and oodles of money. He’s a compulsive worker, he’s designed that way.” Indeed, Gibson has several movie projects in the pipeline. As well as the forthcoming How I Spent My Summer Vacation , which tells the story of a career criminal who learns to survive jail with the help of a nine-year-old boy, he is set to start filming Love and Honour , a swashbuckling romp written by Braveheart scriptwriter Randall Wallace in the autumn. He also plans to return to directing. “I spoke to him a few weeks ago and he sounded very up,” says Winther. “He said all the bad stuff was a cross to bear but he was not letting it burden him. I got the sense he’s a man in control and he knows what he needs to do [and] the movie business is a business that forgives.” Will Gibson have the strength of mind to keep himself on the straight and narrow? Winther believes so: “He’s the kind of guy who never gives up.” It remains to be seen whether Hollywood, and the filmgoing public, will give up on him. Mel Gibson Lars von Trier Elizabeth Day guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Mel Gibson: saint and sinner

On the eve of his movie comeback, can Mel Gibson finally tame his demons? It was a balmy spring evening in Cannes. Arriving for the premiere of his latest film, The Beaver , Mel Gibson seemed anxious as he walked the red carpet last month, a little uncomfortable posing for the massed ranks of photographers who were shouting his name. When the movie’s director, Jodie Foster, leaned across to adjust his bow-tie, Gibson smiled, right on cue. But while the two of them chatted and laughed for the cameras, the actor’s brow remained furrowed. The next day’s photographs would all show the three deep wrinkles cut horizontally across his tanned forehead, giving him the air of someone who expects disappointment and – more often than not – is rewarded with it. He was understandably worried, perhaps, about how the film would be received. The Beaver , in which the 55-year-old Gibson plays a depressed chief executive who communicates with his family through a glove puppet, is the first movie he has made since his inglorious public meltdown. Last July, Gibson became involved in a toxic public battle with his ex-girlfriend and the mother of his youngest child, the Russian musician Oksana Grigorieva. Audiotapes leaked to an American gossip website purportedly recorded Gibson directing a series of aggressively foul-mouthed rants at Grigorieva, slinging racist and misogynist abuse at her. “You look like a fucking bitch in heat,” he shouted, his words slurred and imprecise. “And if you get raped by a pack of niggers, it will be your fault.” It was not the first time that Gibson’s temper and unreconstructed world view had been unpleasantly aired in public. In 2006, he was stopped for speeding by a police officer in Malibu. Gibson, who has a history of alcoholism, was driving with an open bottle of tequila in his car. His blood-alcohol level exceeded the legal limit. As Gibson was handcuffed and put in the back of the police car, he launched into an unprovoked, antisemitic tirade in which he claimed that “the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world”. A subsequent mugshot, released to the media, showed Gibson peering up at the camera with untidily gelled hair, unfocused eyes and an inane smile on his face, as though, even in police custody, the only role he knew how to play was that of the famous heart-throb who could get away with it. As it turned out, he couldn’t. Hollywood retribution to these two incidents was swift. After the first outburst, one studio boss suggested an industry boycott, the comedian Rob Schneider took out a full-page advertisement in Variety stating that he would “never work with Mel Gibson-actor-director-producer and antisemite”, while a mini-series on the Holocaust that Gibson had been developing with the ABC network was dropped. After the second outburst, a cameo part that Gibson had been slated to play in The Hangover II was withdrawn when cast members complained. It was an embarrassing fall from grace for the man who, at the pinnacle of his fame, produced, directed and starred in Braveheart , winning two Oscars for his efforts. There was a tangible sense that, even if no one said it out loud, the once bankable Mel Gibson was now box-office poison. “Apparently, very few people saw this side to Mel all these years,” says Paul Sylbert, a renowned art director who worked with Gibson on the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory . “There have always been antisemites in Hollywood but they keep it more or less to themselves. They don’t get drunk and start shouting at a cop.” Sylbert, who is Jewish, nevertheless says he thought Gibson was “terrific” to work with: “I liked him immediately. He was funny, pleasant, always on time, serious as a worker and as much a part of the crew as it was possible to be. He was playful, funny, like a little child with lots of energy. You couldn’t not like him. At the wrap party, I remember him coming round with a box of cigars, a whole assortment, and he was saying to everybody, ‘Smoke one!’ He couldn’t have been nicer. “He fooled me completely. I don’t think he looked at me as a Jew. I don’t think it entered his head. I think a lot of people like me were baffled by what happened.” Back in Cannes, Gibson was right to be worried about how his new film would be received by the audience. In the event, any fears were to prove groundless. As the credits rolled, the crowd gave The Beaver a 10-minute standing ovation. “The applause went on for so long, I actually began to feel uncomfortable,” says one of Gibson’s entourage. “It just wasn’t ending.” The day after the screening, any lingering interest over Gibson’s past misdemeanours was overshadowed by the Danish director Lars Von Trier claiming to be a Nazi at a press conference. The ensuing scandal conveniently shifted the limelight away from Gibson’s personal life. The Beaver has so far had a muted reception in the States. The reviews, too, have been distinctly mixed. Peter Bradshaw, the Guardian film critic, called it “laborious” and noted that Gibson failed to “project an underlying sympathy or charm in his character”. But Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times hailed it as “a reminder that [Gibson] is, after all, a superb actor”. Can Gibson make a comeback from the depths of public ignominy? “Yes,” says the film historian Peter Biskind. “Practically anybody in America can make a comeback [but] I don’t think The Beaver is going to be the film that does it.” For Biskind, Gibson’s volatility is what makes him “a great actor”. “There’s nothing new about that – most movie stars write their own rules and get away with it.” Gibson has been writing his own rules for longer than most. This is the man who, after becoming one of the highest-grossing actors in Hollywood (his movies, including the hugely popular Mad Max and Lethal Weapon series, have earned more than £1.2bn worldwide), decided to pour several million dollars of his own money into directing a 125-minute film of the last 12 hours of the life of Jesus Christ. The Passion of the Christ , released in 2004, was told exclusively in Aramaic, Latin and Hebrew and contained graphic violence. A 56-year-old woman had a fatal heart attack while watching the crucifixion scene in a cinema in Wichita. In spite of the gory subject matter and allegations of antisemitism in Gibson’s handling of the part played by the Jews in Christ’s death, the film was an unexpected hit and was nominated for three Academy Awards. It made £300m at the box office and catapulted Gibson into the ranks of the movie industry super-rich (because he had his own production company, Icon, he kept control of the profits). His private life, too, seemed atypically stable by Hollywood standards. Gibson, a lifelong Catholic, had been married to Robyn Moore, a former dental nurse, since 1980. The couple had seven children and split their time between two houses in Malibu, an Australian ranch and a Connecticut mansion. For a while, he seemed untouchable. But, six years after The Passion of the Christ , his wife had left him, his former girlfriend had accused him of punching her in the face and he was being publicly reviled as a racist, drunken bigot. What makes a man, seemingly at the height of his creative powers and popular success, risk everything in such spectacular style? And which Mel Gibson are we to believe in – the fresh-faced movie idol who once commanded £10m a movie or the angry drunkard spewing out his spittle-fuelled invective? The answer, according to those who know him, is both. “It’s Jekyll and Hyde,” explains a friend and colleague. “He can be the nicest guy one day: funny, supportive, kind. The next he can be dark and difficult. It’s not a mood swing exactly; it’s more that he has these two distinct personalities and you’re never sure what you’re going to get. On a bad day, he can be depressed, almost bipolar, and he can lose his temper. But on a good day, I’m telling you, there’s no greater guy.” According to Benoît Debie, cinematographer on How I Spent My Summer Vacation which stars Gibson and will be released later this year: “Mel is very intense. He can be both ways. Sometimes, he’ll be very strong and difficult with the crew; sometimes, he can be very nice and kind as well. It’s like there are two polarities.” As an example, Debie points to the fact that the film’s director, Adrian Grunberg, was hand-picked for the project after the pair worked together on Apocalypto , a Mayan action-adventure set in the Mexican jungle which Gibson had directed, with Grunberg acting as his first assistant. “Mel told him, ‘Write a script, I can produce and will act in it and you can direct it,’” recalls Debie. “It was very generous of Mel Gibson to help this young director like that. But at the same time he was quite hard with Adrian on set. Mel could be quite intense with him and sometimes very difficult, a bit overbearing. When Mel was in shot, he liked the camera to see his face. He didn’t want to be in the dark because he’s a legend, a movie star. He’s a good guy but he’s troubled.” Almost everyone I speak to seems to have a similar take: his friends and associates see him as a complex man, riven by contradiction, with a dark edge. And yet, on set, he is also the person who likes to play practical jokes and to defuse tension by simulating farting noises. When Ivana Chubbuck, a Los Angeles-based acting coach, first met Gibson at an Oscars party 10 years ago the two of them “spent hours talking about no matter how dark or dramatic a role is, it also has to have a sense of humour”. Chubbuck, who now counts Gibson as a friend, adds: “The real point about Mel is that he’s got edge, but he’s got it with humour. He’s not afraid to be self-deprecating, but he’s a risk-taker too and that underlying danger makes him interesting.” Perhaps the most surprising admission among those who have worked closely with him through the years is that no one can remember a single incident where Gibson was racist, antisemitic or sexist. It is genuinely hard to find anyone with a bad word to say about him. The majority of people I speak to are utterly mystified by what happened and remain staunchly loyal. Danny Glover, his co-star in Lethal Weapon , has spoken out publicly in support of his friend – “I love Mel… [he's] a very generous man” – and has stated that Gibson made substantial financial donations to anti-apartheid charities in South Africa. Alan Nierob, Gibson’s publicist of 25 years, is Jewish, as is Richard Donner, the director of the Lethal Weapon films and one of Gibson’s closest allies. Jodie Foster, an atheist, recently defended him in Cannes, calling him ” the most loved actor in Hollywood “, and Gibson’s ex-wife, Robyn, issued a sworn declaration insisting that he had never hit her during their 28 years together and was “a wonderful and loving father”. He is capable of grandiose gestures of kindness. While filming How I Spent My Summer Vacation on location in a prison in Veracruz, Mexico, Gibson learned that an elderly Mexican extra was suffering from cancer. “Gibson found him an alternative cancer therapist in Arizona,” says Biskind, who was told the story by a crew member. “He got him a visa by writing to the American ambassador and then flew him there. And this guy was Jewish! The director, Adrian Grunberg, is also Jewish. It just doesn’t compute.” “I’ve never seen him be antisemitic or racist, not at all,” says Kim Winther, who was first assistant director on The Patriot and We Were Soldiers , both of which Gibson starred in. “I never saw him lose his temper, not once. I wouldn’t even know what that’s like. He was always wonderful, open and great with my wife and kids.” Was Winther shocked when Gibson’s outbursts became public knowledge? “Yes. It was a shock to anybody that knew him.” Mel Gibson was born in 1956 in the industrial city of Peekskill, New York, the sixth of 11 children. His father, Hutton, was a railway brakeman until an injury forced him into early retirement. After appearing as a contestant on the American game show, Jeopardy! , Hutton won $21,000 and used the money to emigrate with his family to Australia in 1968, when Mel was 12. A zealous Catholic, Hutton Gibson went on to found the Alliance for Catholic Tradition, a group which issued several polemics in print, condemning the modernising influence of the Second Vatican Council. Over the years, Hutton has been quoted in the media making outspoken and frequently offensive religious statements – criticising the Pope for being too liberal, insisting heretics should be burned at the stake “as an act of charity”, and declaring that the Holocaust was mostly “fiction”. His son has refused to distance himself publicly from his father’s comments. According to Biskind, it is no coincidence that many of Gibson’s films “have an ongoing theme about an authority figure he’s rebelling against or who is his mentor”. Paul Sylbert puts it this way: “I think the motives for Mel’s outbursts go a lot deeper than people realise. First of all, it’s the love of his father who poured all that crap into him.” Growing up, Gibson was indelibly influenced by his father’s beliefs. As an adolescent, he considered becoming a priest before one of his sisters applied on his behalf to the National Institute of Dramatic Arts at the University of New South Wales. Gibson got a place and shared digs with Geoffrey Rush. He never graduated, but he landed the lead role in Mad Max in 1979 and then, two years later, gave a critically acclaimed performance in Peter Weir’s Gallipoli . Shortly afterwards, following his marriage to Robyn, Gibson went to Hollywood to pursue his film career. Although Gibson had remained true to the Catholic faith of his upbringing, the fast-living, heady excesses of Los Angeles in the 1980s proved something of a challenge. He became known as a good-time guy with a quick temper who liked a few beers, an impression aided perhaps by the immense popularity of Martin Riggs, his mischievously irreverent alter ego in the Lethal Weapon franchise. “He’s a guy who, in a bar brawl, would be one of the people fighting,” an unnamed actor was quoted as saying in a People magazine article last year. It was clear that he struggled with fame. Interviewed by this newspaper several years ago, Gibson said of that time: “Your life takes a dramatic change and you do not know how to handle it. There is no academy, no university that teaches you how to be a celebrity.” Concerns about Gibson’s drinking started to emerge when, while filming in Canada in 1983, he hit a car while under the influence and was banned from driving in Ontario for three months. Richard Donner recently revealed that Gibson would “drink a six-pack of beer before he got to work”. He became a loose cannon on publicity junkets. In a now infamous exchange with the Spanish El Pais newspaper in 1991, Gibson made a series of inflammatory homophobic comments. “They take it up the ass,” he said, pointing to his own rear end. “This is only for taking a shit.” He later apologised, claiming he had been drunk on vodka at the time. And yet, like many alcoholics, his drunkenness through the years was spliced with long bouts of sobriety, lucidity and creative energy. It seemed as though he fell into a cycle of intense bouts of work, followed by a conspicuous fall off the wagon resulting in public embarrassment, private shame and a substantial drying-out period, supported by his long-suffering wife. “He sobered up periodically,” says Sylbert, “but you can’t be half an alcoholic.” When he was sober, Gibson was extremely generous towards other people he encountered who were also struggling with addiction. At a party in 2001, Ivana Chubbuck recalls Gibson looking after Robert Downey Jr, who was then recovering from years of substance abuse: “Mel was there sponsoring him, making sure he was staying sober. He always had one eye on him. He is a nurturing soul.” (In fact, at a time when no studio wanted to cast Downey Jr because of the astronomical insurance costs, Gibson put up his own money to ensure he was cast in The Singing Detective in 2003). Gibson also counselled Britney Spears at the height of her public breakdown. Nor were his attentions confined to the rich and famous; Chubbuck remembers Gibson offering his guest house free of charge to a homeless musician until he got back on his feet. “He’s a very loyal and tremendously thoughtful guy,” agrees Kim Winther. “He takes care of pretty much everyone but himself.” Although he might have presented his best side to his friends and colleagues, others found him far less congenial. In an interview with GQ earlier this year, Winona Ryder recalled crossing paths with a “really drunk” Gibson at a Hollywood party in the mid-90s. “I was with my friend who’s gay,” she said. “[Gibson] made a really horrible gay joke. And somehow it came up that I was Jewish. He said something about ‘oven dodgers’. I’d never heard that before. It was just this weird, weird moment. I was like, ‘He’s antisemitic and he’s homophobic.’ No one believed me!’” It was, in many ways, as though Gibson were living a double life: there was the highly controlled professional who was never late to work… and then there was the man who said awful, insulting things when under the influence. As Gibson started to take on more demanding directorial projects, requiring increasing amounts of time away from home, the two lives collided. And his family life, for so long a stabilising influence, began to buckle under the strain. When filming began on Apocalypto in 2005, Gibson was on location in the Mexican jungle near Veracruz during which time the set was battered by heavy rain and hurricanes, meaning that the original eight-week shooting period overran to nine months. He hit the bottle again. “I’ve spoken to people on that shoot and I know it was very difficult because of the alcohol he was drinking,” says Benoît Debie. On his return to Los Angeles, Gibson found that Robyn had moved out of their Malibu home with the children. Shortly afterwards, he made his drunken, antisemitic remarks to a police officer. Unsurprisingly, his friends seek to explain – if not excuse – his behaviour in this context. “It was a drunken outburst to an officer who basically stopped his party and also probably saved his life,” says one close friend. Sylbert adds: “I think what happened is that under severe pressure, with his wife leaving him, his alcohol problems came back. At that point, he was loaded up with all sorts of personal problems. In vino veritas, all this anger comes spewing out, and because he’s a right-wing Catholic who believes the Jews killed Christ, it’s directed at them.” His new relationship with Oksana Grigorieva, a pouting Russian pianist 14 years his junior, did little to help. From the start, Gibson’s friends were unsure of her motives, dismissing her as a golddigger. In 2009, he funded and produced a series of music videos for her. One close friend, who has known Gibson for over 20 years, says he was “not remotely surprised” when audiotapes of the couple’s rows were leaked. “You just have to look at who’s involved and the money she wanted to get out of him,” the friend says, referring to Grigorieva, with whom Gibson now has a one-year-old daughter. Grigorieva’s spokesman declined to comment. “I think it started to go wrong when he met Oksana,” says Chubbuck. “It’s a horrible thing to record someone without their knowledge and of course she sounds rational [on the recordings] because she’s the one with the tape on.” But surely the things Gibson said were indefensible, no matter what the provocation? “Well, if I think of some of the un-PC things I said in anger, especially when there’s children involved, then all bets are off,” counters Chubbuck. Whatever the truth behind those tapes (for a time, Gibson’s lawyers claimed they had proof the recordings had been edited), the ugly public spat with Grigorieva seems to be abating. Last month, she dropped her charges of domestic violence against him after Gibson entered what is known as a “West plea” that enables a case to be settled without the defendant admitting guilt. “I ended it for my children and my family,” Gibson said in an interview. “I’ll take the hit and move on.” The couple now share custody of their daughter, Lucia. “He remains extremely close with all his children,” says a good friend. “They have a great relationship and Robyn has also remained very loyal and supportive through this time. He’s been sober for a year now.” And he is still, as Sylbert points out, extremely rich. “Whatever the settlement with his ex [Grigorieva] will be, it won’t make a dent in it,” he says. “He’s made oodles and oodles of money. He’s a compulsive worker, he’s designed that way.” Indeed, Gibson has several movie projects in the pipeline. As well as the forthcoming How I Spent My Summer Vacation , which tells the story of a career criminal who learns to survive jail with the help of a nine-year-old boy, he is set to start filming Love and Honour , a swashbuckling romp written by Braveheart scriptwriter Randall Wallace in the autumn. He also plans to return to directing. “I spoke to him a few weeks ago and he sounded very up,” says Winther. “He said all the bad stuff was a cross to bear but he was not letting it burden him. I got the sense he’s a man in control and he knows what he needs to do [and] the movie business is a business that forgives.” Will Gibson have the strength of mind to keep himself on the straight and narrow? Winther believes so: “He’s the kind of guy who never gives up.” It remains to be seen whether Hollywood, and the filmgoing public, will give up on him. Mel Gibson Lars von Trier Elizabeth Day guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Mel Gibson: saint and sinner

On the eve of his movie comeback, can Mel Gibson finally tame his demons? It was a balmy spring evening in Cannes. Arriving for the premiere of his latest film, The Beaver , Mel Gibson seemed anxious as he walked the red carpet last month, a little uncomfortable posing for the massed ranks of photographers who were shouting his name. When the movie’s director, Jodie Foster, leaned across to adjust his bow-tie, Gibson smiled, right on cue. But while the two of them chatted and laughed for the cameras, the actor’s brow remained furrowed. The next day’s photographs would all show the three deep wrinkles cut horizontally across his tanned forehead, giving him the air of someone who expects disappointment and – more often than not – is rewarded with it. He was understandably worried, perhaps, about how the film would be received. The Beaver , in which the 55-year-old Gibson plays a depressed chief executive who communicates with his family through a glove puppet, is the first movie he has made since his inglorious public meltdown. Last July, Gibson became involved in a toxic public battle with his ex-girlfriend and the mother of his youngest child, the Russian musician Oksana Grigorieva. Audiotapes leaked to an American gossip website purportedly recorded Gibson directing a series of aggressively foul-mouthed rants at Grigorieva, slinging racist and misogynist abuse at her. “You look like a fucking bitch in heat,” he shouted, his words slurred and imprecise. “And if you get raped by a pack of niggers, it will be your fault.” It was not the first time that Gibson’s temper and unreconstructed world view had been unpleasantly aired in public. In 2006, he was stopped for speeding by a police officer in Malibu. Gibson, who has a history of alcoholism, was driving with an open bottle of tequila in his car. His blood-alcohol level exceeded the legal limit. As Gibson was handcuffed and put in the back of the police car, he launched into an unprovoked, antisemitic tirade in which he claimed that “the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world”. A subsequent mugshot, released to the media, showed Gibson peering up at the camera with untidily gelled hair, unfocused eyes and an inane smile on his face, as though, even in police custody, the only role he knew how to play was that of the famous heart-throb who could get away with it. As it turned out, he couldn’t. Hollywood retribution to these two incidents was swift. After the first outburst, one studio boss suggested an industry boycott, the comedian Rob Schneider took out a full-page advertisement in Variety stating that he would “never work with Mel Gibson-actor-director-producer and antisemite”, while a mini-series on the Holocaust that Gibson had been developing with the ABC network was dropped. After the second outburst, a cameo part that Gibson had been slated to play in The Hangover II was withdrawn when cast members complained. It was an embarrassing fall from grace for the man who, at the pinnacle of his fame, produced, directed and starred in Braveheart , winning two Oscars for his efforts. There was a tangible sense that, even if no one said it out loud, the once bankable Mel Gibson was now box-office poison. “Apparently, very few people saw this side to Mel all these years,” says Paul Sylbert, a renowned art director who worked with Gibson on the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory . “There have always been antisemites in Hollywood but they keep it more or less to themselves. They don’t get drunk and start shouting at a cop.” Sylbert, who is Jewish, nevertheless says he thought Gibson was “terrific” to work with: “I liked him immediately. He was funny, pleasant, always on time, serious as a worker and as much a part of the crew as it was possible to be. He was playful, funny, like a little child with lots of energy. You couldn’t not like him. At the wrap party, I remember him coming round with a box of cigars, a whole assortment, and he was saying to everybody, ‘Smoke one!’ He couldn’t have been nicer. “He fooled me completely. I don’t think he looked at me as a Jew. I don’t think it entered his head. I think a lot of people like me were baffled by what happened.” Back in Cannes, Gibson was right to be worried about how his new film would be received by the audience. In the event, any fears were to prove groundless. As the credits rolled, the crowd gave The Beaver a 10-minute standing ovation. “The applause went on for so long, I actually began to feel uncomfortable,” says one of Gibson’s entourage. “It just wasn’t ending.” The day after the screening, any lingering interest over Gibson’s past misdemeanours was overshadowed by the Danish director Lars Von Trier claiming to be a Nazi at a press conference. The ensuing scandal conveniently shifted the limelight away from Gibson’s personal life. The Beaver has so far had a muted reception in the States. The reviews, too, have been distinctly mixed. Peter Bradshaw, the Guardian film critic, called it “laborious” and noted that Gibson failed to “project an underlying sympathy or charm in his character”. But Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times hailed it as “a reminder that [Gibson] is, after all, a superb actor”. Can Gibson make a comeback from the depths of public ignominy? “Yes,” says the film historian Peter Biskind. “Practically anybody in America can make a comeback [but] I don’t think The Beaver is going to be the film that does it.” For Biskind, Gibson’s volatility is what makes him “a great actor”. “There’s nothing new about that – most movie stars write their own rules and get away with it.” Gibson has been writing his own rules for longer than most. This is the man who, after becoming one of the highest-grossing actors in Hollywood (his movies, including the hugely popular Mad Max and Lethal Weapon series, have earned more than £1.2bn worldwide), decided to pour several million dollars of his own money into directing a 125-minute film of the last 12 hours of the life of Jesus Christ. The Passion of the Christ , released in 2004, was told exclusively in Aramaic, Latin and Hebrew and contained graphic violence. A 56-year-old woman had a fatal heart attack while watching the crucifixion scene in a cinema in Wichita. In spite of the gory subject matter and allegations of antisemitism in Gibson’s handling of the part played by the Jews in Christ’s death, the film was an unexpected hit and was nominated for three Academy Awards. It made £300m at the box office and catapulted Gibson into the ranks of the movie industry super-rich (because he had his own production company, Icon, he kept control of the profits). His private life, too, seemed atypically stable by Hollywood standards. Gibson, a lifelong Catholic, had been married to Robyn Moore, a former dental nurse, since 1980. The couple had seven children and split their time between two houses in Malibu, an Australian ranch and a Connecticut mansion. For a while, he seemed untouchable. But, six years after The Passion of the Christ , his wife had left him, his former girlfriend had accused him of punching her in the face and he was being publicly reviled as a racist, drunken bigot. What makes a man, seemingly at the height of his creative powers and popular success, risk everything in such spectacular style? And which Mel Gibson are we to believe in – the fresh-faced movie idol who once commanded £10m a movie or the angry drunkard spewing out his spittle-fuelled invective? The answer, according to those who know him, is both. “It’s Jekyll and Hyde,” explains a friend and colleague. “He can be the nicest guy one day: funny, supportive, kind. The next he can be dark and difficult. It’s not a mood swing exactly; it’s more that he has these two distinct personalities and you’re never sure what you’re going to get. On a bad day, he can be depressed, almost bipolar, and he can lose his temper. But on a good day, I’m telling you, there’s no greater guy.” According to Benoît Debie, cinematographer on How I Spent My Summer Vacation which stars Gibson and will be released later this year: “Mel is very intense. He can be both ways. Sometimes, he’ll be very strong and difficult with the crew; sometimes, he can be very nice and kind as well. It’s like there are two polarities.” As an example, Debie points to the fact that the film’s director, Adrian Grunberg, was hand-picked for the project after the pair worked together on Apocalypto , a Mayan action-adventure set in the Mexican jungle which Gibson had directed, with Grunberg acting as his first assistant. “Mel told him, ‘Write a script, I can produce and will act in it and you can direct it,’” recalls Debie. “It was very generous of Mel Gibson to help this young director like that. But at the same time he was quite hard with Adrian on set. Mel could be quite intense with him and sometimes very difficult, a bit overbearing. When Mel was in shot, he liked the camera to see his face. He didn’t want to be in the dark because he’s a legend, a movie star. He’s a good guy but he’s troubled.” Almost everyone I speak to seems to have a similar take: his friends and associates see him as a complex man, riven by contradiction, with a dark edge. And yet, on set, he is also the person who likes to play practical jokes and to defuse tension by simulating farting noises. When Ivana Chubbuck, a Los Angeles-based acting coach, first met Gibson at an Oscars party 10 years ago the two of them “spent hours talking about no matter how dark or dramatic a role is, it also has to have a sense of humour”. Chubbuck, who now counts Gibson as a friend, adds: “The real point about Mel is that he’s got edge, but he’s got it with humour. He’s not afraid to be self-deprecating, but he’s a risk-taker too and that underlying danger makes him interesting.” Perhaps the most surprising admission among those who have worked closely with him through the years is that no one can remember a single incident where Gibson was racist, antisemitic or sexist. It is genuinely hard to find anyone with a bad word to say about him. The majority of people I speak to are utterly mystified by what happened and remain staunchly loyal. Danny Glover, his co-star in Lethal Weapon , has spoken out publicly in support of his friend – “I love Mel… [he's] a very generous man” – and has stated that Gibson made substantial financial donations to anti-apartheid charities in South Africa. Alan Nierob, Gibson’s publicist of 25 years, is Jewish, as is Richard Donner, the director of the Lethal Weapon films and one of Gibson’s closest allies. Jodie Foster, an atheist, recently defended him in Cannes, calling him ” the most loved actor in Hollywood “, and Gibson’s ex-wife, Robyn, issued a sworn declaration insisting that he had never hit her during their 28 years together and was “a wonderful and loving father”. He is capable of grandiose gestures of kindness. While filming How I Spent My Summer Vacation on location in a prison in Veracruz, Mexico, Gibson learned that an elderly Mexican extra was suffering from cancer. “Gibson found him an alternative cancer therapist in Arizona,” says Biskind, who was told the story by a crew member. “He got him a visa by writing to the American ambassador and then flew him there. And this guy was Jewish! The director, Adrian Grunberg, is also Jewish. It just doesn’t compute.” “I’ve never seen him be antisemitic or racist, not at all,” says Kim Winther, who was first assistant director on The Patriot and We Were Soldiers , both of which Gibson starred in. “I never saw him lose his temper, not once. I wouldn’t even know what that’s like. He was always wonderful, open and great with my wife and kids.” Was Winther shocked when Gibson’s outbursts became public knowledge? “Yes. It was a shock to anybody that knew him.” Mel Gibson was born in 1956 in the industrial city of Peekskill, New York, the sixth of 11 children. His father, Hutton, was a railway brakeman until an injury forced him into early retirement. After appearing as a contestant on the American game show, Jeopardy! , Hutton won $21,000 and used the money to emigrate with his family to Australia in 1968, when Mel was 12. A zealous Catholic, Hutton Gibson went on to found the Alliance for Catholic Tradition, a group which issued several polemics in print, condemning the modernising influence of the Second Vatican Council. Over the years, Hutton has been quoted in the media making outspoken and frequently offensive religious statements – criticising the Pope for being too liberal, insisting heretics should be burned at the stake “as an act of charity”, and declaring that the Holocaust was mostly “fiction”. His son has refused to distance himself publicly from his father’s comments. According to Biskind, it is no coincidence that many of Gibson’s films “have an ongoing theme about an authority figure he’s rebelling against or who is his mentor”. Paul Sylbert puts it this way: “I think the motives for Mel’s outbursts go a lot deeper than people realise. First of all, it’s the love of his father who poured all that crap into him.” Growing up, Gibson was indelibly influenced by his father’s beliefs. As an adolescent, he considered becoming a priest before one of his sisters applied on his behalf to the National Institute of Dramatic Arts at the University of New South Wales. Gibson got a place and shared digs with Geoffrey Rush. He never graduated, but he landed the lead role in Mad Max in 1979 and then, two years later, gave a critically acclaimed performance in Peter Weir’s Gallipoli . Shortly afterwards, following his marriage to Robyn, Gibson went to Hollywood to pursue his film career. Although Gibson had remained true to the Catholic faith of his upbringing, the fast-living, heady excesses of Los Angeles in the 1980s proved something of a challenge. He became known as a good-time guy with a quick temper who liked a few beers, an impression aided perhaps by the immense popularity of Martin Riggs, his mischievously irreverent alter ego in the Lethal Weapon franchise. “He’s a guy who, in a bar brawl, would be one of the people fighting,” an unnamed actor was quoted as saying in a People magazine article last year. It was clear that he struggled with fame. Interviewed by this newspaper several years ago, Gibson said of that time: “Your life takes a dramatic change and you do not know how to handle it. There is no academy, no university that teaches you how to be a celebrity.” Concerns about Gibson’s drinking started to emerge when, while filming in Canada in 1983, he hit a car while under the influence and was banned from driving in Ontario for three months. Richard Donner recently revealed that Gibson would “drink a six-pack of beer before he got to work”. He became a loose cannon on publicity junkets. In a now infamous exchange with the Spanish El Pais newspaper in 1991, Gibson made a series of inflammatory homophobic comments. “They take it up the ass,” he said, pointing to his own rear end. “This is only for taking a shit.” He later apologised, claiming he had been drunk on vodka at the time. And yet, like many alcoholics, his drunkenness through the years was spliced with long bouts of sobriety, lucidity and creative energy. It seemed as though he fell into a cycle of intense bouts of work, followed by a conspicuous fall off the wagon resulting in public embarrassment, private shame and a substantial drying-out period, supported by his long-suffering wife. “He sobered up periodically,” says Sylbert, “but you can’t be half an alcoholic.” When he was sober, Gibson was extremely generous towards other people he encountered who were also struggling with addiction. At a party in 2001, Ivana Chubbuck recalls Gibson looking after Robert Downey Jr, who was then recovering from years of substance abuse: “Mel was there sponsoring him, making sure he was staying sober. He always had one eye on him. He is a nurturing soul.” (In fact, at a time when no studio wanted to cast Downey Jr because of the astronomical insurance costs, Gibson put up his own money to ensure he was cast in The Singing Detective in 2003). Gibson also counselled Britney Spears at the height of her public breakdown. Nor were his attentions confined to the rich and famous; Chubbuck remembers Gibson offering his guest house free of charge to a homeless musician until he got back on his feet. “He’s a very loyal and tremendously thoughtful guy,” agrees Kim Winther. “He takes care of pretty much everyone but himself.” Although he might have presented his best side to his friends and colleagues, others found him far less congenial. In an interview with GQ earlier this year, Winona Ryder recalled crossing paths with a “really drunk” Gibson at a Hollywood party in the mid-90s. “I was with my friend who’s gay,” she said. “[Gibson] made a really horrible gay joke. And somehow it came up that I was Jewish. He said something about ‘oven dodgers’. I’d never heard that before. It was just this weird, weird moment. I was like, ‘He’s antisemitic and he’s homophobic.’ No one believed me!’” It was, in many ways, as though Gibson were living a double life: there was the highly controlled professional who was never late to work… and then there was the man who said awful, insulting things when under the influence. As Gibson started to take on more demanding directorial projects, requiring increasing amounts of time away from home, the two lives collided. And his family life, for so long a stabilising influence, began to buckle under the strain. When filming began on Apocalypto in 2005, Gibson was on location in the Mexican jungle near Veracruz during which time the set was battered by heavy rain and hurricanes, meaning that the original eight-week shooting period overran to nine months. He hit the bottle again. “I’ve spoken to people on that shoot and I know it was very difficult because of the alcohol he was drinking,” says Benoît Debie. On his return to Los Angeles, Gibson found that Robyn had moved out of their Malibu home with the children. Shortly afterwards, he made his drunken, antisemitic remarks to a police officer. Unsurprisingly, his friends seek to explain – if not excuse – his behaviour in this context. “It was a drunken outburst to an officer who basically stopped his party and also probably saved his life,” says one close friend. Sylbert adds: “I think what happened is that under severe pressure, with his wife leaving him, his alcohol problems came back. At that point, he was loaded up with all sorts of personal problems. In vino veritas, all this anger comes spewing out, and because he’s a right-wing Catholic who believes the Jews killed Christ, it’s directed at them.” His new relationship with Oksana Grigorieva, a pouting Russian pianist 14 years his junior, did little to help. From the start, Gibson’s friends were unsure of her motives, dismissing her as a golddigger. In 2009, he funded and produced a series of music videos for her. One close friend, who has known Gibson for over 20 years, says he was “not remotely surprised” when audiotapes of the couple’s rows were leaked. “You just have to look at who’s involved and the money she wanted to get out of him,” the friend says, referring to Grigorieva, with whom Gibson now has a one-year-old daughter. Grigorieva’s spokesman declined to comment. “I think it started to go wrong when he met Oksana,” says Chubbuck. “It’s a horrible thing to record someone without their knowledge and of course she sounds rational [on the recordings] because she’s the one with the tape on.” But surely the things Gibson said were indefensible, no matter what the provocation? “Well, if I think of some of the un-PC things I said in anger, especially when there’s children involved, then all bets are off,” counters Chubbuck. Whatever the truth behind those tapes (for a time, Gibson’s lawyers claimed they had proof the recordings had been edited), the ugly public spat with Grigorieva seems to be abating. Last month, she dropped her charges of domestic violence against him after Gibson entered what is known as a “West plea” that enables a case to be settled without the defendant admitting guilt. “I ended it for my children and my family,” Gibson said in an interview. “I’ll take the hit and move on.” The couple now share custody of their daughter, Lucia. “He remains extremely close with all his children,” says a good friend. “They have a great relationship and Robyn has also remained very loyal and supportive through this time. He’s been sober for a year now.” And he is still, as Sylbert points out, extremely rich. “Whatever the settlement with his ex [Grigorieva] will be, it won’t make a dent in it,” he says. “He’s made oodles and oodles of money. He’s a compulsive worker, he’s designed that way.” Indeed, Gibson has several movie projects in the pipeline. As well as the forthcoming How I Spent My Summer Vacation , which tells the story of a career criminal who learns to survive jail with the help of a nine-year-old boy, he is set to start filming Love and Honour , a swashbuckling romp written by Braveheart scriptwriter Randall Wallace in the autumn. He also plans to return to directing. “I spoke to him a few weeks ago and he sounded very up,” says Winther. “He said all the bad stuff was a cross to bear but he was not letting it burden him. I got the sense he’s a man in control and he knows what he needs to do [and] the movie business is a business that forgives.” Will Gibson have the strength of mind to keep himself on the straight and narrow? Winther believes so: “He’s the kind of guy who never gives up.” It remains to be seen whether Hollywood, and the filmgoing public, will give up on him. Mel Gibson Lars von Trier Elizabeth Day guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Jean Cocteau: France in uproar over museum ‘fakes’

Experts clash over the authenticity of dozens of works by the celebrated poet and artist Engraved on the tombstone of Jean Cocteau – poet, painter, film-maker and dramatist – in the 12th-century Chapelle Sainte-Blaise-des-Simples is the epitaph: I remain with you. With more than 50 books, 24 plays and musicals, a dozen films, and countless designs, paintings, drawings, ceramics, varied works of art and even a postage stamp, much of the prolific French artist’s oeuvre is indeed still with us. The only problem, it has been alleged, is that not all of it is his. A spectacular row between key figures responsible for a new Cocteau museum in the south of France has prompted claims that some of the works to be displayed are fakes, leading to rancorous lawsuits and at least one alleged sacking. When it opens in November, the museum at Menton, near Monaco – the town that was a holiday retreat of both Winston Churchill and author Katherine Mansfield – hopes to become the biggest single collection of Cocteau works. Severin Wunderman, a Belgian-born American art collector, philanthropist, Holocaust survivor and renowned watchmaker, donated 1,800 of the artist’s works to the town before his death in 2008 and officials decided to construct a building to house them. First, however, the collection – made up of 623 designs, 425 photographs, 177 manuscripts, 70 posters, 51 prints as well as sculptures, ceramics, glass works and tapestries – had to be verified. Cocteau, like his friend and contemporary Pablo Picasso, has long been a favourite with forgers. Art expert Annie Guédras, who was designated by Cocteau’s heirs as the only person legally authorised to “evaluate, authenticate and index” his paintings and drawings, examined the Wunderman collection. She concluded that dozens of works were copies or fakes. However, the Cocteau committee, set up to manage the artist’s estate, headed by Pierre Bergé – co-owner of Le Monde and partner of the late fashion designer Yves Saint Laurent – disagreed. Bergé, a friend of Cocteau’s companion Edouard Dermit, was given moral rights to the artist’s work when Dermit died in 1995. He has been an active custodian of Cocteau’s legacy and put around €1.5m (£1.3m) of his own money into a €3.5m five-year restoration of the artist’s home at Milly-la-Forêt, south of Paris, where Cocteau lived from 1947 until his death in 1963, and where he produced some of his most impressive work. The Chapelle Sainte-Blaise-des-Simples, where Cocteau is buried, is nearby. Bergé called in another art expert, a decision that infuriated Guédras, who accused him of calling into question her professional judgment as well as breaking the legal agreement designating her as the only person authorised to authenticate Cocteau’s work. She promptly resigned from the Cocteau committee and sued. Last year she won unspecified damages equivalent to three years’ salary, a decision that Bergé immediately took to appeal. The row did not stop there. When Hugues de la Touche, curator of Menton’s museums, agreed with Guédras’s defence and declared the Wunderman collection to be of “dubious quality” and “not worthy of an establishment labelled an official French museum”, he claims he lost his job. He too is taking legal action. Now it appears Guédras and de la Touche may have been at least partly right. In February a third examination of the Wunderman collection – by two new art experts – concluded that at least 35 works were either fakes or copies. “Our analysis and that of Annie Guédras are reasonably convergent,” said one of the experts. It has now been agreed that the contested works will not go on display in the new museum. It has also been suggested that the row was caused by the Cocteau committee’s reluctance to provoke a confrontation with the notoriously temperamental Wunderman. In 1995 the Los Angeles Times wrote of the reclusive millionaire: “Not content with shouting and breaking things, he has already thrown more than one portable telephone from the window of his Rolls Royce.” The French newspaper Libération said Bergé and the committee may have been anxious to avoid losing Wunderman’s legacy by suggesting the collection included forgeries. “Perhaps it was a case of showing a little tolerance so that Wunderman did not take back part of his legacy… even if it meant closing eyes to several doubtful works at least for a little while,” it wrote. Menton, where the Jean Cocteau-Severin Wunderman museum is nearing completion, adopted Cocteau as an honorary citizen after he redecorated the local marriage hall with a spectacular series of paintings, ceramics and tapestries. The building will replace an existing Cocteau museum and is expected to draw 100,000 visitors a year. Jean Cocteau France Europe Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Puyehue volcano in Chile erupts, prompting mass evacuation

Chilean government evacuates 3,500 people from surrounding area, as winds fan ash towards Argentina Thousands of people have been evacuated from their homes after a volcano which has been dormant for decades started erupting in southern Chile. Large columns of smoke reached more than six miles from the crater of the Puyehue volcano, which lies about 500 miles south of the capital, Santiago. Winds fanned the ash towards neighbouring Argentina over the skies in the ski resort city of San Carlos de Bariloche, which caused the local airport to close. The governor of Chile’s Los Rios region said fire could be seen in the volcano’s crater and smoke was billowing into the sky. The eruption prompted authorities to shut a heavily travelled border crossing with Argentina, but there have been no reports of injuries. The Chilean government said it was evacuating 3,500 people from the surrounding area as a precaution. Authorities put the area around the volcano on alert after a flurry of earthquakes. The National Emergency Office says it has recorded an average of 230 tremors an hour. “The Cordon Caulle (volcanic range) has entered an eruptive process, with an explosion resulting in a 10-kilometre-high gas column,” state emergency office ONEMI said. The chain of Puyehue-Cordon Caulle volcanos – of which there are four – last saw a major eruption in 1960. Chile Natural disasters and extreme weather Argentina guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Records Show 31 Other Christie Trips: MyFoxPHILLY.com You have to admire the sheer audacity of Chris Christie. He blows up a deal for a tunnel that would have eased the commuter crush from New Jersey into New York City, and now we know why: Because he isn’t commuting by car like the peons! PHILADELPHIA – Flight logs obtained by MyFoxPhilly.com show New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie used state police helicopters 33 times since January 2010, mostly for official functions. Link: List Of Trips (As PDF File ) Christie will repay taxpayers for two recent trips on the helicopters, when he used the state-owned vehicles to attend his son’s baseball games.The other 31 flight logs show that Christie used the helicopters to attend official functions, such as Rep. John Adler’s funeral and the announcement of the Bayonne Bridge improvement project. But other trips were to Manhattan to discuss Christie’s political agenda with the national media, and to have dinner with New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. On one trip, Christie used the helicopter to talk with The Wall Street Journal and New York Times in January 2011. Another flight log, from April 11, 2011, listed “transport home” as the reason for the helicopter trip. In April 2010, Christie flew to meet with the owners of the New York Giants and New York Jets. Both teams play in New Jersey. In all, Christie used state helicopters nine times to fly to Manhattan for various reasons. And in August 2010, Christie flew to Newark to meet with Mayor Cory Booker and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Christie and the State Republican Committee are reimbursing New Jersey for the governor’s personal use of a state police helicopter for the two trips to watch his oldest son’s baseball games, a spokeswoman for Christie said Thursday.

Continue reading …
New Rule: Contrary to What Republican Candidates Always Sell, Business Experience Does Not Make Someone a Good President

Click here to view this media Looks like Bill Maher and I are on the same page this week with this GOP talking point that somehow having business experience makes someone a good candidate for president. Maher used the examples of George W. Bush, Donald Trump, and Mitt Romney’s experience as CEO of Bain Capital to shoot that down during his New Rules segment on Real Time.

Continue reading …
Greta Van Susteren Schools NYT’s Charles Blow On Obamanomics

Fox News's Greta Van Susteren on Saturday took issue with New York Times columnist Charles Blow's recent piece “False Choice.” In it, the perilously liberal commentator criticized Republicans for wanting to solve the nation's economic woes with a mixture of tax and spending cuts: The U.S. added 54,000 jobs in May, far fewer than expected, and the unemployment rate ticked up to 9.1 percent. This is the latest in a cavalcade of worrisome economic indicators — from double-dipping home prices to flagging consumer confidence — that illustrate just how fragile the recovery has been, just how inadequate and anemic the stimulus was and just how tenuous the government’s grip is on the reins. It is against this backdrop that Republicans have decided to play chicken with the nation’s credit — insisting on spending cuts while steadfastly resisting tax increases. This is part of the modern doctrine of a compassion-free conservatism that’s using the fog of the fiscal crisis to push a program of perverse wealth inequality as sound economic policy: The only way to jump-start the economy is to slash taxes on the wealthy and on companies; the only way to compensate for the deficits that those tax cuts exacerbate is to slash benefits to the poor and vulnerable. It would be comical if it weren’t so callous. Van Susteren was having none of this: I think Mr. Blow is missing something. We all agree that we have a serious problem (our economy and our long term national debt and its impact on our economy.) Here is something that stands out: current policies, in effect since at least February 09 are simply not working to jazz up the economy and/or reduce the national debt. The opposite has happened. Our debt is much worse, and without more people at work (unemployment is rising), the government has reduced revenue to fund it and to pay the debt. That’s bad. In looking at various options from the two political parties, Mr. Blow calls the Republican economic ideas “faulty logic.” I don’t know if the Republican’s economic ideas in our current situation is “faulty logic” or not — but I do know that President Obama’s February 09 stimulus bill is “faulty logic” or we would be doing better. The current indicators are just plain bad. People are hurting. Mr. Blow thinks we need “sensible tax increases” on the wealthy and “sensible spending cuts.” Is he right? If in the last 2 1/2 years there was real improvement, I would take a chance on his ideas (all economic policies s are a chance in my mind since no one can be certain when it comes to such a fluid topic with so many variables as the economy.) I have a hard time trusting the economic judgment of anyone who pushed a policy that has not worked to rev up the economy. Indeed. Obama has had approaching 2 1/2 years to right this ship and it in some ways appears in greater danger than it did when he took the helm. Unemployment is up. Gas prices are up. Food prices are up. Home prices are down. And debt is exploding. Exactly how is that a record that anyone on either side of the aisle can feel good about? If this president was a Republican, the press would have been deriding his economic results for months forcing his favorability ratings into the thirties and making any chance of reelection slim. Is there an economic tipping point where liberal media members like Blow would agree that Obama's policies aren't working and the nation needs a new leader? Or is Party far more important to America's so-called journalists than a strong economy?

Continue reading …
Afghans enjoy a new prosperity but fear for a future without the coalition

Business is booming in Kabul, but as the west prepares to ship out, ordinary citizens worry about what lies ahead Under the trees, the Karimi family have spread out a rug. The Afghan summer sun filters through the leaves. There is chicken, fried potato cakes, salad and water melon. This is a Friday afternoon ritual, at least since the security improved enough to allow the family to drive the 10 miles from Kabul without fear of insurgents or robbers. The Karimis came back to the city in 2002, after living as refugees in Iran through the civil war of the early 1990s and the rule of the Taliban that followed. Now three generations live together in Kabul: 70-year-old Syed Hussein, Fatima, 29, a student teacher, her husband and her two children. And every Friday they come to this patch of riverside woodland on the outskirts of the city. “When we came back, life was very hard,” Fatima says. “But every year that has passed things have got better.” Syed Hussein, her father, smiles when asked when times were best in his long life – the average life expectancy for Afghans is still only 44, two years more than a decade ago. “Afghanistan is a wonderful country… the only problem is the Afghans!” he says and chuckles at his own joke. “The best times were when I was a teenager. Since, it has been just trouble after trouble.” Physical reminders of those troubles surround the family’s picnic site, known as Daoud’s Garden after Mohammed Daoud Khan, the president deposed and assassinated in a communist coup in 1978. There is a large military base less than a mile away. Once manned by Afghan auxiliaries fighting alongside the Soviets, it is now full of Afghans being trained to fight with, or instead of, US-led coalition forces. A major American base is close by too. An Afghan commando unit guards the approaches to the gardens. “Without these soldiers we could not come here,” says Fatima. “In fact, we could barely go anywhere.” For behind the bucolic scene lies deep anxiety. Every year in Kabul there is a different theme to the interminable conversations about “the situation”. In 2008 it was the apparently inexorable advance of the Taliban, almost to where Fatima and her family were picnicking. In 2009, it was the new “surge” of troops and money announced by President Barack Obama. In 2010, it was the success or failure of the expanded campaign. Now, without exception, talk is of the withdrawal of western troops, aid and attention from Afghanistan. Within weeks, Obama is expected to announce the first departures. David Cameron has already said he wants 450 of Britain’s 9,500 men out within months. The international community has agreed that all foreign combat troops are to be gone by 2014, leaving the Afghans to fight the Afghans. “This is a very worrying thing,” says Fatima, and the festive atmosphere of the picnic cools. “If the west go, then it will all fall apart and the Taliban will come back.” The Karimis are from the Hazara ethnic minority, persecuted under the largely Pashtun Taliban’s rule. They are also Shia Muslims, whom the Taliban once saw as heretics. Their moderate traditions – Fatima wears a simple white headscarf rather than the all-covering burqa – meant they suffered greatly when the radical movement were in power. Now there are functioning universities, schools, relative law and order and even improving electricity. “But we still have much to fear,” Mousa, Fatima’s husband, said. Many in Kabul are more worried about their wallets than persecution. The 10-year international effort has seen Kabul change from being a moribund city of fewer than 400,000 to a bustling metropolis of 4.5 million flush with cash. The last two years have seen an explosion in conspicuous consumption. There are blocks of luxury apartments under construction, giant video hoardings advertising energy drinks, BMWs and Hummers blasting their way through the traffic with overpowered horns. Miralam Hosseini, 56, sells at least two $140,000 4x4s every week. Across the street from his showroom, an electronics shops stocks the latest 52in flat screen. “We sell one every few days,” said Mahmud Shah, who returned to Kabul earlier this year after seven years in London. Cars and televisions alike are always paid for in cash. “Narc-hitecture” – vast and garish villas built by those said to be involved in Afghanistan’s $4bn drugs trade – is becoming increasingly visible. There are also the new restaurants where lunch is 30 times the average daily wage. If soaring food prices pose a huge problem to millions in the city, they do not bother those who have profited from the boom. But there is a sense now that the party is over. Little of the money in Kabul – other than the profits of the narcotics trade – has been created here. Beyond drugs, Afghanistan still produces very little. Profits from the country’s vast mineral or metal deposits are a distant prospect. “No one is within a decade of even beginning to successfully mine, process, transport and sell all the copper and iron that is here,” one European diplomat admitted. Much of the economy has thus been built on the tens of billions poured into Afghanistan by the west. Huge sums have been embezzled, vast wasteful contracts have fuelled a “construction sector on speed” and the main bank is alleged to have made $500m in undocumented and potentially fraudulent loans, many to associates or relatives of the president, Hamid Karzai. Once much disappeared to Dubai. More recently, following the global turndown, the cash has stayed in Kabul. Land prices have risen fivefold. Then there are the tens of thousands of consultants, translators and office staff working for international NGOs or foreign government contractors. Salaries of $3,000 are common, an enormous sum locally. The best paid earn much more. “I vetoed a contract giving a local consultant a salary three times that of the president of my country,” said the diplomat. “Then I found out it had been done anyway behind my back.” The new money and the westernisation that has gone with it is most evident in places like the Gulbahar Centre, a recently opened complex of luxury flats, shops and fast-food restaurants in the heart of Kabul, only a hundred metres from the new main mosque. Last week Samer, 18, and Zohour, 21, were having lunch in Big Chief Burger on the ground floor of the complex. One was a “cultural adviser” for the US embassy; the other a business student and son of a major government transport contractor. “It’s a stressful place to live. I relax by going to the gym or hanging out. This is an Islamic country so there are no bars or clubs,” said Zohour, wearing a sweatshirt, baggy shorts and flip-flops. “I’m worried about when the Americans go. Now the war is a long way from here. We don’t want it any closer.” Some observers have noted a parallel with the 1980s, when Kabul benefited from Soviet aid, reconstruction projects and jobs while the war continued in the countryside. As early as 2005, a World Bank report noted that “the main beneficiaries of [overseas] assistance have been the urban elite”. There are bombings and attacks in Kabul but few casualties and little destruction compared to the south or east. A Nato military intelligence officer told the Observer that the economic “rural-urban divide” was one of the biggest drivers of the insurgency. When the Soviets left, Afghanistan was plunged into civil war and much of Kabul destroyed. Now all in Kabul are worrying what the departure of the most recent batch of foreigners to intervene in their country will bring. “The whole of the American effort and that of our allies is starting to be framed around this concept of 2014 and the need for an Afghan lead by then,” a US official told the Observer . “Is there a rush for the exit? Absolutely not. Too many people have lost their lives, too many valuable things have been gained.” This at least is a sentiment Fatima and her family would agree with. “They can’t leave, they simply can’t,” said Mohammed, Fatima’s brother-in-law. “It’ll be chaos, anarchy. The Taliban will be back. Everything that has got better will get worse. I am certain the foreign troops will still be here in many, many years.” Afghanistan Taliban Jason Burke guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …