Music industry sources suggest that Apple has signed up the four major US labels for a Spotify-style streaming service Apple’s chief executive, Steve Jobs, will make a rare public appearance on Monday to show off a new music subscription and content sharing service called iCloud, and new software to power the iPhone. Jobs, 56, is unexpectedly breaking his medical leave from the company to appear at its Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco. Music industry sources indicate that Apple has now signed up the four major music labels in the US – Sony, Universal, EMI and Warner Music – for iCloud. It is thought that it will provide a music streaming service in the US similar to that available in Europe from Spotify. However it is not clear whether the music elements of iCloud will initially be available outside the US. Reports by the New York Post suggest that Apple has had to make upfront payments to the labels of between $100m (£61m) and $150m to secure their business and ensure that it gets a lead over Spotify and rival music services launched in March and May from Amazon and Google. Jobs is also scheduled to show off the new version of the software to run the hugely successful iPhone – but analysts are not expecting to see a new version of the device itself before September. They think that Apple is shifting its timing so that iPhone releases come closer to Christmas, in order to boost seasonal sales. The Apple chief will have an audience of app developers who may also be keen to know how the company is going to protect them from a growing number of threats from patent holders in the US, where software can be patented. In the past two months more than a dozen developers for the iPhone have been sued by companies which claim to have patents covering the systems they use, and demanding payments. The developers, though, hope that Apple will seek to protect them because if developers are scared off there will be fewer apps for the iPhone and iPad – which will hit Apple’s sales. Jobs’s presence is surprising because he announced in January that he would be taking time away from the company for unexplained medical reasons. It is believed that they are related to his surgery in 2004 for neuroendocrine cancer in the pancreas, a treatable condition, and a subsequent liver transplant. Jobs appeared very gaunt in pictures published this year, such as at a dinner with Barack Obama in February and his only other public appearance, to launch the iPad 2 tablet in March. Steve Jobs Digital music and audio Apple Computing Tablet computers Spotify Internet Charles Arthur guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Ash and gas continue to billow from Chilean volcano that erupted violently on Saturday Ash and gas continue to billow from the Chilean volcano that erupted violently on Saturday, prompting the evacuation of more than 3,500 people living nearby and forcing the cancellation of flights. A column of gas six miles high and three miles wide rose from the Puyehue-Cordon Caulle complex, according to Chile’s national geology and mining service. There were no reports of injuries from the eruption. Rodrigo Ubilla, Chile’s undersecretary of labour, said some people near the volcano had decided not to leave their homes because they did not want to abandon their animals. Wind carried ash across the Andes to Argentina, dusting the tourist town of San Carlos de Bariloche, which closed its airport. Officials urged people to use cover their mouths and noses against the ashand to stay indoors if possible. The eruption is nearly 620 miles south of Chile’s capital, Santiago. Authorities had put the area on alert on Saturday morning after a flurry of earthquakes, and the eruption began in the afternoon. The National Emergency Office said it had recorded an average of 230 tremors an hour. Chile Argentina Natural disasters and extreme weather guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Ash and gas continue to billow from Chilean volcano that erupted violently on Saturday Ash and gas continue to billow from the Chilean volcano that erupted violently on Saturday, prompting the evacuation of more than 3,500 people living nearby and forcing the cancellation of flights. A column of gas six miles high and three miles wide rose from the Puyehue-Cordon Caulle complex, according to Chile’s national geology and mining service. There were no reports of injuries from the eruption. Rodrigo Ubilla, Chile’s undersecretary of labour, said some people near the volcano had decided not to leave their homes because they did not want to abandon their animals. Wind carried ash across the Andes to Argentina, dusting the tourist town of San Carlos de Bariloche, which closed its airport. Officials urged people to use cover their mouths and noses against the ashand to stay indoors if possible. The eruption is nearly 620 miles south of Chile’s capital, Santiago. Authorities had put the area on alert on Saturday morning after a flurry of earthquakes, and the eruption began in the afternoon. The National Emergency Office said it had recorded an average of 230 tremors an hour. Chile Argentina Natural disasters and extreme weather guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …As Bonn talks begin, UN climate chief warns of temperature goals set too low and clock ticking on climate change action The world may have to resort to technology that sucks greenhouse gases from the air to stave off the worst effects of global warming, the UN climate change chief has said before talks on the issue beginning on Monday. “We are putting ourselves in a scenario where we will have to develop more powerful technologies to capture emissions out of the atmosphere,” said Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN framework convention on climate change. “We are getting into very risky territory,” she said, stressing that time was running out. The UN climate talks starting on Mondayin Bonn, which run for the next two weeks, will try to revive the negotiations before the next climate conference, taking place in Durban, South Africa, in December. But little progress is expected, as the negotiating time is likely to be taken up with details such as rules on monitoring emissions. Figueres tried to inject a greater sense of urgency into the proceedings by pointing to research from the International Energy Agency that found that emissions had soared last year by a record amount. The strong rise means it will take more effort by governments to curb emissions. Figueres told the Guardian in an interview that governments should act now to save money: “We add $1tn to the cost [of tackling climate change] with every year of delay.” However, as the latest talks begin, the world’s leading climate change official has upset governments by insisting that the aim of the negotiations ought to be to hold warming to less than 1.5C. That would be a much tougher goal than that set by governments last year, which seeks to limit the temperature rise to no more than 2C – the safety threshold, scientists say, beyond which warming becomes catastrophic and irreversible. “In my book, there is no way we can stick to the goal that we know is completely unacceptable to the most exposed [countries],” Figueres said. The difference between the two goals may not seem great, but since it has taken more than 20 years of talks for countries to agree on the 2C limit, many are unwilling to reopen the debate. Delegates are conscious that wrangling over whether to stick to 1.5C or 2C was one of the main sources of conflict at the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009; the hope has been that talks can move on to other issues such as how to pay for emissions curbs in poorer countries. The UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change said: “Countries agreed in Copenhagen they would revisit the adequacy of the 2C goal in 2015. With the climate change negotiations seemingly stagnant, the focus now needs to be on doing what has already been agreed.” Other parties agreed. “This is an extraordinary intervention,” said one official, who could not be named. Figueres said that she had the support of the world’s least developed countries, most of Africa, and small island states. Another factor casting a pall over this year’s talks, which are intended to forge a new global treaty on climate change, is criticism of the South African government, which will host the Durban talks. No interim meetings have yet been set up, and countries have complained of disorganisation and a lack of enthusiasm. But Figueres said: “South Africa has been very carefully listening, trying to understand where there are commonalities and where the weaknesses are.” She also predicted the US would play a strong role in the talks, despite the Obama administration facing Republican opposition in Congress to action on emissions. “It’s very evident that the legislative body in the US has disengaged, but … the administration continues to be engaged.” she said. But Todd Stern, chief negotiator for the US, praised the spirit of co-operation he perceived in the talks: “People are rolling up their sleeves and being constructive.” Global climate talks Climate change United Nations Carbon emissions Switzerland Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …As Bonn talks begin, UN climate chief warns of temperature goals set too low and clock ticking on climate change action The world may have to resort to technology that sucks greenhouse gases from the air to stave off the worst effects of global warming, the UN climate change chief has said before talks on the issue beginning on Monday. “We are putting ourselves in a scenario where we will have to develop more powerful technologies to capture emissions out of the atmosphere,” said Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN framework convention on climate change. “We are getting into very risky territory,” she said, stressing that time was running out. The UN climate talks starting on Mondayin Bonn, which run for the next two weeks, will try to revive the negotiations before the next climate conference, taking place in Durban, South Africa, in December. But little progress is expected, as the negotiating time is likely to be taken up with details such as rules on monitoring emissions. Figueres tried to inject a greater sense of urgency into the proceedings by pointing to research from the International Energy Agency that found that emissions had soared last year by a record amount. The strong rise means it will take more effort by governments to curb emissions. Figueres told the Guardian in an interview that governments should act now to save money: “We add $1tn to the cost [of tackling climate change] with every year of delay.” However, as the latest talks begin, the world’s leading climate change official has upset governments by insisting that the aim of the negotiations ought to be to hold warming to less than 1.5C. That would be a much tougher goal than that set by governments last year, which seeks to limit the temperature rise to no more than 2C – the safety threshold, scientists say, beyond which warming becomes catastrophic and irreversible. “In my book, there is no way we can stick to the goal that we know is completely unacceptable to the most exposed [countries],” Figueres said. The difference between the two goals may not seem great, but since it has taken more than 20 years of talks for countries to agree on the 2C limit, many are unwilling to reopen the debate. Delegates are conscious that wrangling over whether to stick to 1.5C or 2C was one of the main sources of conflict at the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009; the hope has been that talks can move on to other issues such as how to pay for emissions curbs in poorer countries. The UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change said: “Countries agreed in Copenhagen they would revisit the adequacy of the 2C goal in 2015. With the climate change negotiations seemingly stagnant, the focus now needs to be on doing what has already been agreed.” Other parties agreed. “This is an extraordinary intervention,” said one official, who could not be named. Figueres said that she had the support of the world’s least developed countries, most of Africa, and small island states. Another factor casting a pall over this year’s talks, which are intended to forge a new global treaty on climate change, is criticism of the South African government, which will host the Durban talks. No interim meetings have yet been set up, and countries have complained of disorganisation and a lack of enthusiasm. But Figueres said: “South Africa has been very carefully listening, trying to understand where there are commonalities and where the weaknesses are.” She also predicted the US would play a strong role in the talks, despite the Obama administration facing Republican opposition in Congress to action on emissions. “It’s very evident that the legislative body in the US has disengaged, but … the administration continues to be engaged.” she said. But Todd Stern, chief negotiator for the US, praised the spirit of co-operation he perceived in the talks: “People are rolling up their sleeves and being constructive.” Global climate talks Climate change United Nations Carbon emissions Switzerland Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Failed former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin insists that she didn’t flub the history of Paul Revere. The former Alaska governor was widely mocked last week when she offered a skewed version of the Revere story. “He who warned, uh, the British that they weren’t going to be taking away our arms uh by ringing those bells and making sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free and we were going to be armed,” she explained to reporters in Boston, Massachusetts Thursday . “You realized you messed up about Paul Revere?” Fox News host Chris Wallace noted in an interview with Palin Sunday. “You know what, I didn’t mess up about Paul Revere,” Palin replied. “Here is what Paul Revere did. He warned the Americans that the British were coming, the British were coming and they were going to try to take our arms and we have to make sure we were protecting ourselves and shoring up all of our ammunitions and our firearms so they couldn’t take it.” She continued: “Remember, the British had been there, many soldiers for seven years in that area. Part of Paul Revere’s ride — it wasn’t just one ride — he was a courier, a messenger. Part of the ride was to warn British that we’re already there. You are not going to succeed. You are not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual private militia we have. He did warn the British.” “In a shout out, gotcha question that was asked of me, I answered candidly. I know my American history,” she added. “Well, I got to tell you, I wasn’t sure entirely before I asked you the question,” Wallace admitted, “so I went to Google to make sure I knew as much. We both know now.” The detailed account of what happened on April 18, 1775 offered by the Paul Revere House in Boston differs from Palin’s. “Paul Revere was sent for by Dr. Joseph Warren and instructed to ride to Lexington, Massachusetts, to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock that British troops were marching to arrest them.” You be the judge: He who warned…uh.. the British that they weren’t going to be taking away our arms uh…by ringing those bells and making sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free and we were going to be armed.
Continue reading …Old and new media clashed on CNN's “Reliable Sources” Sunday. After CBS News Congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes blamed Andrew Breitbart for her network's slow response to the ongoing Weinergate scandal, Gawker staff writer Maureen O'Connor said, “I think even if that's the case, it was very quickly that you could have looked into this story and verified it for yourself” (video follows with trancript and commentary): HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: So what about Jeff’s point, I mean, did this deserve air time on the CBS Evening News or not? NANCY CORDES, CBS NEWS CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Well, we actually didn't cover it on Saturday, on Sunday, on Monday, on Tuesday because there were a lot of red flags to the story. As you have pointed out as well. KURTZ: Maybe he was a victim. CORDES: Maybe he was a victim. He insisted from the very beginning he had nothing to do with this, it was a prank. The person who reported it, Andrew Breitbart, has a history of taking Democrats out of context and smearing them. The person who discovered this… KURTZ: That was not the case here though. CORDES: The person who discovered the tweet, except, but that was a reason people were going slow on the story. KURTZ: So, you were wary? CORDES: We were wary? Moments later, Gawker’s O’Connor struck back: KURTZ: Maureen, do you see a serious side to this outside the world of Gawker, or is this story kind of shear entertainment? MAUREEN O’CONNOR, STAFF WRITER FOR GAWKER: You know, one thing I do take issue with is, as Nancy mentioned, at first people didn't take the story seriously because it showed up on Andrew Breitbart’s website, and they say he has a history of trying to smear people. I think even if that's the case, it was very quickly that you could have looked into this story and verified it for yourself. It didn't take a lot of effort to realize that Anthony Weiner admitted, yes, this showed up in my Twitter feed. So, it clearly wasn't some kind of like imaginary thing. He admitted, yes, this happened. So, I think that it makes sense that people did ask questions, and after that, once he answered his questions, it was by the time he got to interview four, five. That’s where it was in his power to make it stop if he wanted to, but all of a sudden we have this man who seems to want to give many, many interviews about his own genitals. So, I think on that hand, that's why in the beginning it was a relevant story. And I think it is important for people, even if a story burbles up through an untraditional, non-mainstream medium, if it seems like a real story, I think people do have an obligation to investigate it. Indeed, but that didn't prevent a number of news outlets from fixating on Breitbart to minimize the seriousness of this issue. Not coincidentally, as NewsBusters reported Thursday, Cordes was part of that red herring. But as O'Connor accurately noted, regardless of what one of the original sources was, this was an easy issue to investigate the veracity of, and all this finger-pointing at Breitbart as the reason for why some news outlets were slow on the uptake is nonsense. Brava, Maureen. Brava!
Continue reading …Syrian state television reports at least 14 dead after attempted border breach by pro-Palestinians Israeli troops opened fire on Sunday at a crowd of pro-Palestinian protesters who tried to break into the Israel-controlled Golan Heights from neighbouring Syria, killing at least 14 people and wounding scores of others. The casualty figures came from Syrian state television and were confirmed by the head of a hospital treating the victims. The Israeli military said it was not tracking casualties on either side. Israel accused the Syrian regime of orchestrating the violence – the second border clash in less than a month – to deflect attention from its bloody crackdown on the uprising against its president Bashar al-Assad. Syrian television said the melee was spontaneous and reflected built-up anger among Palestinians. The protests marked 44 years since the 1967 Middle East war erupted. Israel had mobilised thousands of troops to prevent a repeat of last month’s disturbance when hundreds of people broke through a border fence, entered the Golan Heights and clashed with Israeli forces. “Unfortunately, extremist forces around us are trying today to breach our borders and threaten our communities and our citizens. We will not let them do that,” the prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu told his cabinet. He said security forces had been ordered to show “maximum restraint”. Despite Israel’s warnings, hundreds of demonstrators – a mix of Palestinians and their Syrian supporters – passed Syrian and UN posts and marched to the barbed-wire-lined trench the Israeli military dug along the border after last month’s unrest. Protesters waved Palestinian flags and threw rocks and debris over the fence. As the crowd reached the border, soldiers shouted warnings through megaphones. “Anybody who gets close to the fence is endangering his life,” they said. When the demonstrators pushed forward, troops opened fire, sending crowds running in panic. Several wounded people were taken away by demonstrators, but dozens more continued heading toward the trench. Those evacuating casualties shouted “shahid” (martyr). Protesters, most of them young men, eventually managed to cut through coils of barbed wire marking the frontier, entering a buffer zone and crawling toward a second fence guarded by Israeli troops. Dr Ali Kanaan, director of the Quneitra hospital, confirmed the television report of 14 dead – 12 Palestinians and two Syrians. He said 225 were wounded. The youngest victim was a 15-year-old Palestinian, Mohammed Issa, who lived in the Neira refugee camp in Aleppo. Several protesters said they saw a landmine explode near two Israeli soldiers as they were chasing away the crowds at the border. “We were trying to cut the barbed wire when the Israeli soldiers began shooting directly at us,” Ghayath Awad, a 29-year-old Palestinian who was shot in the waist, told the AP at the hospital. Mohammed Hasan, a 16-year old student, was wounded in both feet. “We want on this occasion to remind America and the whole world that we have a right to return to our country,” he said. The recent protests are designed to draw attention to the plight of Palestinian refugees who fled or were expelled from their homes during Israel’s war of independence in 1948. The original refugees, and their descendants, now number several million and they demand the right to return to the families’ former properties. Israel says such a move would spell the end of the country as a Jewish state. About half a million Palestinian refugees live across 13 camps in Syria, a country with a population of 23 million. Palestinians are allowed to work and study, but they do not have citizenship and cannot vote. The Israeli military put the blame on the Syrian regime, which has killed more than 1,200 citizens during three months of demonstrations against Assad. The Syrian military, which tightly controls access to the border, did not keep the protesters from reaching the fence. “This is an attempt to divert international attention from the bloodbath going on in Syria,” said Lt. Col. Avital Leibovich, an Israeli military spokeswoman. “We are guarding our border. I wish they had obeyed our verbal warnings, but they chose instead to clash with the soldiers.” There was relative calm on Israel’s other borders on Sunday. Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Israel Syria Palestinian territories guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Tracking the U.S. economy these days is like watching the Titanic go down, except the crew members are running around the deck, waving their arms and saying, “Everything’s fine, don’t panic! Everybody back to the all-you-can-eat buffet!” On This Week with Christiane Amanpour, White House economic adviser Austan Goolsbee insists this is not a jobless recovery and everything’s moving along just the way they planned. It seems clear that economists like Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz and Dean Baker were right about the disastrous long-term consequences of an inadequate stimulus, while the White House keeps insisting it worked. Not only do they insist it worked, they want to emphasize more of the same pro-business, deregulation strategy. To me, this very risky half-assed approach is sort of like a parent patting herself on the back that, when her kid had a strep throat, she saved money by only filling half of the antibiotic prescription. So now the infection’s gone into his heart, but he no longer has a sore throat . Progress! Bottom line? Voters will not trust this president with a second term if they don’t hear an economic narrative coming out of the White House that resonates with their own experience. They will not trust President Obama to fix the economy if he can’t identify what they perceive as the real problem: AMANPOUR: So you’ve heard all that. John Berman set it up. This Friday, this last jobs report was meant to be the acid test. What is that telling us? Is the recovery threatened? GOOLSBEE: Well, hold on. And I said last month when we had an excellent jobs report, 100,000 above expectations, and I said again this last Friday when it came in below expectations, don’t — don’t make too much of any one month’s job report, because they’re highly variable . You want to look at a little bit of a trend to get a more accurate barometer, and the overall direction is, yes, somewhat slowed from the stiff headwinds of gas prices, of the events in Japan, of some of the events in Europe. But overall, the last six months, we’ve added a million jobs in the private sector. AMANPOUR: Right, but every economist, including many of your advisers and colleagues, have said that in order for this to be sustainable, you have to actually have above 150,000 jobs per month. And it was way below that this month. GOOLSBEE: Well, and in the three months before that, it was well above it . What I’m emphasizing is the — every economist knows that the monthly numbers are highly variable, so you want to look at a little bit more than just one month before concluding on a trend. AMANPOUR: So what happens if this same kind of report comes out next month? What does that then tell you? GOOLSBEE: Well, look, what we know is that we have moved a long way from when the economy is in a rescue mode, the private sector’s in freefall, and the government is the only thing standing between us and falling into another Great Depression. We were losing 780,000 jobs a month when the president comes into office. Fast-forward to now: We’ve added 1 million jobs over the last six months. If we face stiff headwinds, that are shocks like the — like the Japanese earthquake, we have to deal with that, but I think the — the trend is relatively clear. AMANPOUR: But what do you say to the American people when so many economists were expecting something, according to a Bloomberg survey, of 165,000 to 170,000 to be created this month, to see the unemployment come down a little, which it didn’t? What do you say to the American people about that? Where is the light, in other words? GOOLSBEE: The first thing that I say is the same thing I said one month ago when it came in the opposite, 100,000 above expectations, and that is, let’s not conclude too much of anything from one report. Let’s look at what’s happened over six months. And what has happened over six months is we’ve added a million jobs in the private sector. The president has enacted — we passed a tax policy in December, which has come into place this year and will continue over the course of this year, to put — to give a payroll tax of $1,000 plus to 150 million workers and to give direct incentives for business to start investing. And they’ve accumulated money on their balance sheet. Our — our effort now as a government should be to get the private sector, to help them stand up and lead the recovery. It — the government is not the central driver of recovery. Yes, that attitude continues to be the problem. When you have 9% unemployment and no consumer demand, the government should be driving the economy to get spending cash back into the hands of people who will spend it, and they’re not. As Jared Bernstein told us last week, the White House just wasn’t interested in that approach. AMANPOUR: Right, but, again, it is slower than expected. So, economists are asking and people are asking, is this kind of a wake-up call, do you think, to sort of shift the political debate from what’s been all about debt reduction and shift it back to job creation? I mean, is this an opportunity, for instance, to try to talk about creating jobs and adding maybe another stimulus? Let’s say there was no politics involved, in a perfect environment. What would you do to get this off the slow burner? GOOLSBEE: Well, I would say two or three thing. The first is, the president has never stopped talking about jobs. For him, the growth strategy is the number-one issue. Now, we must live within our means. We have a moment that we can talk about long-run deficit reduction . And the vice president’s leading an effort to do that, that the president has asked him to. But the president is getting up every day — on Friday, he’s going out to Ohio to talk about jobs in manufacturing, which manufacturing is having its best employment year in almost 15 years. Look at how he answered that question. She wanted to know what they’d do if there were no political obstacles, and he responded by bringing up deficit reduction. If that isn’t a major clue about the Obama administration’s determination to cut entitlement programs, I don’t know what is. AMANPOUR: And yet that came down, as well, manufacturing jobs… GOOLSBEE: Well, durable goods manufacturing was up. AMANPOUR: But what specifically can you do to change this? GOOLSBEE: OK. So the — we have shifted in the economy from a rescue phase, which is government-directed, to a phase in which government policies have got — we’ve got to rely on government policies that are trying to leverage the private sector and give incentives to the private sector to be doing the growth. And that — so the president has started these tax cuts that will continue over the rest of this year, has put in place this regulatory review in which all of the major agencies are going to go through, find any outmoded regulations, ones that are excessively costly for their benefits, find ways to streamline. AMANPOUR: Would there be more payroll cuts… GOOLSBEE: The free-trade agreements… AMANPOUR: … tax cut holiday? GOOLSBEE: Well, we still — there will be more payroll tax cut over the entire course of this year. It’s more than $1,000 a worker for 150 million workers. The free-trade agreements, trying to increase exports, which are rising at 15 percent annual rates. The infrastructure bank that the president has called for, which, again, is trying to leverage, using government incentives to get private capital to enter and help grow the economy. That — that — those are the things that we’ve got to be doing. And I would just emphasize, the president’s plan is putting us on the right track. Over the last 15 months, we’ve added more than 2 million jobs in the private sector. That’s far in excess of what it was in the comparable period after the last recession. AMANPOUR: So are you — are you not worried — well, I mean, a report that’s about to come out is saying that this is the longest jobless recovery, it’s going to come out this month, that’ll it take more than 60 months… GOOLSBEE: It’s not a jobless recovery. AMANPOUR: … of GDP recovered. It’ll take until 2016. GOOLSBEE: It’s not a jobless recovery. That is an incorrect phrase. After the last recession, in this comparable period, post-recession, we had lost 100,000 jobs. We’ve added more than 2 million jobs. There’s a major difference between a jobless recovery and a very deep hole that we’re climbing our way out of, and that is what — the position we’re in. AMANPOUR: So a part of the whole that everybody is looking at right now is the debt ceiling. Do you anticipate that this is going to be resolved over the next — over the next month or so… (CROSSTALK) GOOLSBEE: I do. I do — I — I definitely think it’s going to be resolved, because it has to be. The U.S. is a nation that pays its bills, and ultimately we’re not going to decide that we refuse to pay the bills that we already have. AMANPOUR: Are you concerned that Moody’s is saying that it may look at downgrading if certain benchmarks aren’t met? GOOLSBEE: Look, I think what Moody said is, you have to pay your bills, and if you don’t pay your bills, there are going to be consequences. And I think everybody agrees with that. Now, I’m relatively optimistic that — because you’ve seen leaders on both sides of the aisle saying they don’t want to push this all the way right up to the — to the edge of the — of Treasury’s authority of what can be done. This is not an alarm clock. It would be extremely dangerous to get right up to the edge or — you’ve seen some people even saying, well, it’d be OK if we defaulted for a short period. That’s not true; we shouldn’t do that. We should resolve this over the next month. AMANPOUR: Austan Goolsbee, thank you very much, indeed, for joining me.
Continue reading …Tens of thousands of demonstrators had gathered in Delhi in support of Swami Ramdev’s fast against corruption Indian police have used teargas and batons to break up a mass anti-corruption protest led by India’s most famous yoga guru, in the latest high-profile clash between authorities and campaigners over graft. At least 30 people were injured, several seriously, in chaotic scenes in the capital, Delhi, after negotiations between the government and the saffron-robed guru Swami Ramdev to end the protest broke down. After senior government figures appeared on TV threatening “firm action”, police appear to have been ordered in to disperse tens of thousands of demonstrators, many from rural areas or small towns, who had gathered under tents in the centre of the city. Some of Ramdev’s supporters threw stones at police. Ramdev, who rose from a humble background to run a £20m empire of ashrams and alternative medicine, was arrested while trying to disguise himself in women’s clothing, and was flown to the northern city of Haridwar, where he has his headquarters. “You could not imagine a government handling it more clumsily,” said Professor Jayati Ghosh, a respected Indian analyst and economist. Ramdev, whose television channel draws audiences of up to 30 million and whose international network of ashrams includes one on a Scottish island, had begun fasting “unto death” on Saturday morning. The incident is likely to further embarrass the ailing government of the prime minister, Manmohan Singh, and fuel broad public anger over a series of graft scandals. Corruption has long been a problem in India. Paying small bribes is a part of everyday life and senior ministers, bureaucrats, military officers and other officials are repeatedly found to have made vast sums illicitly. The issue has become a focus of frustrations with the current government, a coalition led by the Congress party. One recent scam may have cost the country as much as £25bn. Leaders of India’s main opposition party, the Bharatiya Janata, (BJP), attacked the Congress party and said the police action had been “a shameful chapter in the democracy of this country”. Ramdev criticised the Congress president, Italian-born Sonia Gandhi, saying she did not appear to love Indians, a charge frequently made by the rightwing in India. Congress party figures alleged Ramdev was linked to opposition parties including extremist Hindu nationalist groups. Digvijay Singh, a senior Congress leader who had earlier questioned Ramdev’s luxurious lifestyle and called his campaign a “five-star” protest, accused the guru of inciting people. “You can’t allow people like Ramdev to run riot in a capital like Delhi. Some laws, some rules have to be followed,” Singh said. “And whereas he has taken permission for yogic shivir [camp], what was he doing there? He was trying to agitate people.” Political analysts point out that the recent campaigns against corruption have gathered public support in part because they exist outside the domain of established politics. However, both Ramdev and Anna Hazare, a veteran social activist who launched a similar anti-graft protest in April, have deeply conservative views on many issues. Ramdev dislikes Coca-Cola and western clothes, believes the World Health Organisation is a western conspiracy and is openly homophobic. Hazare is a strict teetotaller, believes in flogging and has banned tobacco, meat and cable TV in the village where he lives near the central city of Pune. Both men favour capital punishment for offences of corruption. “Ramdev and Hazare are fundamentally very populist. They are authoritarian, with have a simplistic message and are extremely socially and politically conservative. They are presented as moral figures but are not,” said Ghosh, the analyst. Both men also contest the same political ground – one possible reason for the increasing intensity of their activism. On Sunday Hazare pledged to fast again. So too did Ramdev, who plans to launch a political party to contest the 2014 general election. “My hunger strike has not ended. I will continue fasting,” Ramdev told a news conference. The guru, who has made a fortune through alternative medecine, has called on the government to pursue billions of dollars in illegal funds abroad. Huge amounts of money have disappeared from India, one of the world’s fastest growing economies, in recent decades. Ramdev has also called for a ban on notes of large denomination – 500 and 1,000 Indian rupees (£7 and £14) – which represent huge wealth for the hundreds of millions of people in India who survive on less than £1 a day. Corruption is now on such a scale in India that it threatens the continued economic success of the country, depressing the stock market and worrying investors. Analysts are concerned that the latest incidents will again stall key reforms to facilitate overseas investment and improve India’s parlous infrastructure, which have already repeatedly been postponed, in part due to opposition protests over graft causing parliamentary deadlock. Corruption in India Recent high-profile Indian corruption scandals have included the 2G scam – named after the mobile telephone technology for which licences in India were allegedly sold off at cut-price rates in return for kickbacks – and allegations of fraud in preparations for the 2010 Commonwealth Games in Delhi. The 2G scam is thought to have cost the country up to £25bn. An investigation has resulted in a former minister and the daughter of a southern Indian political leader being jailed. An inquiry into the Games is ongoing but has already led to the arrests of senior figures in the ruling Congress party. Other scandals have included a luxury housing development built for widows of war heroes that was appropriated by politicians, senior officers and bureaucrats in the commercial capital of Mumbai and revelations of corruption in government programmes to distribute subsidised food to the poor. In the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, where 200 million largely poor people live, the extent of the graft and the extent of the programme make it potentially the biggest single example of corruption in the world with tens of thousands of officials, thousands of politicians and more than £30bn worth of aid implicated. Few sectors are untouched. One recent scandal was less about cash than influence. A series of phone taps released to the media revealed corporate lobbyists apparently discussing cabinet appointments with ministers and journalists. There are regular scandals over “paid news” by which newspapers accept cash to run particular stories. Topbank officials have been accused of taking bribes to grant corporate loans. Many senior judges are alleged to be corrupt. An ex-chief justice is under investigation. India Jason Burke guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …