The area in the centre of the Greek capital is playing host to thousands of angry demonstrators Athenians used to stop off at Syntagma Square for the shopping, the shiny rows of upmarket boutiques. Now they arrive in their tens of thousands to protest. Swarming out of the metro station, they emerge into a village of tents, pamphleteers and a booming public address system. Since 25 May, when demonstrators first converged here, this has become an open-air concert – only one where bands have been supplanted by speakers and music swapped for an angry politics. On this square just below the Greek parliament and ringed by flashy hotels, thousands sit through speech after speech. Old-time socialists, American economists just passing through, members of the crowd: they each get three minutes with the mic, and most of them use the time alternatively to slag off the politicians and to egg on their fellow protesters. “Being here makes me feel 18 again,” begins one man, his polo shirt stretched tight over his paunch, before talking about his worries about his pension. The closer you get to the Vouli, the parliament, the more raucous it becomes. Jammed up against the railings, a crowd is clapping and chanting: “Thieves! Thieves!” There is another mic here, and it’s grabbed by a man wearing a mask of deputy prime minister Theodoros Pangalos: “My friends, we all ate together.” He is quoting the socialist politician, who claimed on TV last year that everyone bore the responsibility for the squandering of public money. Pangalos may have intended his remark as the Greek equivalent of George Osborne’s remark that “We’re all in it together”, but here they’re not having it.”You lying bastard!” They roar back. “You’re so fat you ate the entire supermarket.” This is an odd alloy of earnestness and pantomime, to be sure, but it’s something else too: Syntagma Square has become the new frontline of the battle against European austerity. And as prime minister George Papandreou battles first to keep his own job, and then to win MPs’ support for the most extreme package of spending cuts, tax rises and privatisations ever faced by any developed country, what happens between this square and the parliament matters for the rest of the eurozone. The banner wavers here know this. In the age of TV satellite vans and YouTube, they paint signs and coin slogans with half an eye on the export market. Papandreou’s face is plastered over placards that congratulate him in English for being “Goldman Sachs’ employee of the year”. Flags jibe at the rive gauche : “The French are sleeping – they’re dreaming of ’68.” Most of the time, the anger is expressed sardonically. A friend shows me an app on her phone that gives updates on the latest political and industrial actions – its name translates as iStrike. But it’s not hard to see how this situation might boil over. “Are you an indignado?” I ask Nikkos Kokkalis, using the term coined by young Spanish protesters to express outrage at José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero’s austerity plans, now swiped by the Greeks. “I’m a super-indignado,” he almost shouts. A 29-year-old graduate who lives with his parents, Nikkos has never done a proper job – just menial tasks for a website and an internship for a TV station. “There are 300 people over there,” he waves at the MPs’ offices. “Most of them make decisions without asking the people.” For their part, protesters with salaries and wrinkles are fuming at the spending cuts already inflicted on them. Chryssa Michalopolou is a teacher who calculates that her annual pay has already gone down by the equivalent of one and a half months, while her living costs have shot up, thanks to rising taxes and inflation. Does she buy the government’s line that it needs to trim the public sector? “After 15 years’ service, I’m only on €1,200 (£1,056) a month,” she says. “I didn’t see any boom; I simply paid my taxes and now I am being punished.” On display here is more than a personal grievance; it also reveals a glaring truth that politicians across Europe have so far ignored. In their efforts to hammer out a second loan agreement for Greece, eurozone ministers are focusing on the differences between bond swaps and bond rollovers, the tensions between Berlin and the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank or how far continental banks can withstand another massive shock. Taken for granted in these negotiations is that the Greeks (and by implication, the Irish and the Portuguese) must accept more austerity. Yet in Athens, whether on the streets or even at a policy-making level, these technical details barely figure on the agenda. It’s not just that the terms are different, the entire debate is too. Here, the argument concerns how much more austerity the Greek economy, its people and even the government can take – because all three are already at breaking point. When Greece was all but locked out of the financial markets last May, Papandreou accepted a €110bn loan from Europe and the IMF. The idea was that the money would tide the country over for a year, in which time his government would at least start sorting out its public finances. For Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy and the rest of Europe, the loan came with some pretty tight strings attached: they charged the Greeks interest well above the official eurozone rate, and set demanding budget targets for the Pasok socialist government. Freefall A year in, and the deal is not working. Greece has been in recession for two years and on official forecasts this will be its third. When I ask Athens University economist Yanis Varoufakis to describe the economy, he shoots back one sentence: “It’s in freefall.” Sitting on the balcony of his flat behind the Acropolis, he throws out some statistics: 50,000 businesses went bankrupt last year, industrial production fell 20% and will drop another 12% this year. Unemployment has surged, so that one in six of the workforce doesn’t have a job. These are the sort of figures associated with a depression, and the predictable result is that the public finances are getting worse. Greece’s debt has ballooned to 153% of GDP; on Varoufakis’s projections, even if ministers manage to make all their promised cuts, the government will owe three times the entire national income. Behind these numbers lie the stories of a society in distress. One man talks about his daughter who works in the in-store restaurant of a large supermarket outside Athens; at closing time, she and her workmates have started giving out the unsold meals to the newly unemployed – the 21st-century equivalent of a soup kitchen. An employee of a local council notes that they pick up 17% less rubbish than a year ago, simply because people have cut back on food. The owner of an art gallery tells me her son has just started his first job; holding a master’s in accountancy, he works six hours a day in a mobile-phone shop. The lazy accusation to hurl at Greece is that it had a bloated public sector and so was bound to come a cropper. Not so, says Varoufakis: the country has a public sector in line with the rest of Europe (although, nearly everyone I speak to agrees, one that does not work as well), but takes in taxes some 35% below where they should be. Wealthy Greeks have always treated the country’s tax system like a church collection plate: what they give is strictly optional. This gap was covered up for as long as the Greek state could get cheap credit; then in 2008 it became glaringly obvious. The other problem covered up during the boom years was the rotting away of the industrial base. That too is now the subject of angry public discussion. I take a tour of the shipbuilding yard in Perama, just outside Athens. Greece has the largest commercial fleet in the world, and yet Perama is utterly silent. There is a rusting hulk, abandoned a few years ago, when those who commissioned it could no longer afford to pay for it. A decade ago, this yard employed 7,000 workers – now it has around 500. There was a time when assembling small cargo vessels was seen as pedestrian work; last year, the yard was contracted to build two boats, and the jobs were fought over. A few minutes away lives Tassos Alexandris, who was laid off from Perama in 2008. The hall of his flat is decorated with needlepoint; inside are pictures of the Virgin Mary put up by his wife, Nikki. She is ill, and his 26-year-old daughter has worked for six months in her entire career. How do they make ends meet? Nikki snorts with laughter. “The electricity connection is inside the flat; otherwise the board would have cut us off,” begins Tassos. His mother-in-law lives upstairs and, while he is too ashamed to ask her for food, she allows him to raid her fridge at night. They had a small green Citroen, but couldn’t afford to keep it. Now he runs a motorbike, although with no plates and no taxes. “I can’t sleep at night for worry,” he says. “It has affected every part of our lives: personal, sexual, the lot.” How many families in this block do they think are in a similar situation? Nikki tots them up: “80%.” Tassos doesn’t just support the protesters of Syntagma; he thinks they will go further. “Don’t be surprised if Athens goes up in flames,” the 50-year old says. “And don’t be sad, either.” His words initially sound melodramatic, but the anger keeps coming up. “Politicians now walk around with bodyguards,” says Aris Chatzistefanou, the co-director of Debtocracy, a film about the Greek crisis that has become a sensation. He quotes a newspaper report of how restaurateurs are taking down those cheesy framed photos of dining politicians, of how one government spokesman went to dinner a few weeks ago only for the rest of the restaurant to start shouting “You are eating the blood of the people”. Political arithmetic The anger against the austerity and the politicians imposing it is palpable; whether it will translate into political success is debatable. Papandreou may be one of the most hated men in Greece, but there is no mainstream politician who has an alternative to acting under creditor’s orders. This isn’t about an electorate taking on a government, either, but the impossible political arithmetic of disparate groups of Greeks on one side versus the IMF, the European Central Bank and 16 other eurozone members on the other. Run that by the protesters of Athens, though, and even the older, more pragmatic ones have an answer. “We may lose,” one grey-haired trade unionist said to me. “But what matters is how you lose.” Greece Europe European debt crisis European banks Europe Aditya Chakrabortty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The area in the centre of the Greek capital is playing host to thousands of angry demonstrators Athenians used to stop off at Syntagma Square for the shopping, the shiny rows of upmarket boutiques. Now they arrive in their tens of thousands to protest. Swarming out of the metro station, they emerge into a village of tents, pamphleteers and a booming public address system. Since 25 May, when demonstrators first converged here, this has become an open-air concert – only one where bands have been supplanted by speakers and music swapped for an angry politics. On this square just below the Greek parliament and ringed by flashy hotels, thousands sit through speech after speech. Old-time socialists, American economists just passing through, members of the crowd: they each get three minutes with the mic, and most of them use the time alternatively to slag off the politicians and to egg on their fellow protesters. “Being here makes me feel 18 again,” begins one man, his polo shirt stretched tight over his paunch, before talking about his worries about his pension. The closer you get to the Vouli, the parliament, the more raucous it becomes. Jammed up against the railings, a crowd is clapping and chanting: “Thieves! Thieves!” There is another mic here, and it’s grabbed by a man wearing a mask of deputy prime minister Theodoros Pangalos: “My friends, we all ate together.” He is quoting the socialist politician, who claimed on TV last year that everyone bore the responsibility for the squandering of public money. Pangalos may have intended his remark as the Greek equivalent of George Osborne’s remark that “We’re all in it together”, but here they’re not having it.”You lying bastard!” They roar back. “You’re so fat you ate the entire supermarket.” This is an odd alloy of earnestness and pantomime, to be sure, but it’s something else too: Syntagma Square has become the new frontline of the battle against European austerity. And as prime minister George Papandreou battles first to keep his own job, and then to win MPs’ support for the most extreme package of spending cuts, tax rises and privatisations ever faced by any developed country, what happens between this square and the parliament matters for the rest of the eurozone. The banner wavers here know this. In the age of TV satellite vans and YouTube, they paint signs and coin slogans with half an eye on the export market. Papandreou’s face is plastered over placards that congratulate him in English for being “Goldman Sachs’ employee of the year”. Flags jibe at the rive gauche : “The French are sleeping – they’re dreaming of ’68.” Most of the time, the anger is expressed sardonically. A friend shows me an app on her phone that gives updates on the latest political and industrial actions – its name translates as iStrike. But it’s not hard to see how this situation might boil over. “Are you an indignado?” I ask Nikkos Kokkalis, using the term coined by young Spanish protesters to express outrage at José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero’s austerity plans, now swiped by the Greeks. “I’m a super-indignado,” he almost shouts. A 29-year-old graduate who lives with his parents, Nikkos has never done a proper job – just menial tasks for a website and an internship for a TV station. “There are 300 people over there,” he waves at the MPs’ offices. “Most of them make decisions without asking the people.” For their part, protesters with salaries and wrinkles are fuming at the spending cuts already inflicted on them. Chryssa Michalopolou is a teacher who calculates that her annual pay has already gone down by the equivalent of one and a half months, while her living costs have shot up, thanks to rising taxes and inflation. Does she buy the government’s line that it needs to trim the public sector? “After 15 years’ service, I’m only on €1,200 (£1,056) a month,” she says. “I didn’t see any boom; I simply paid my taxes and now I am being punished.” On display here is more than a personal grievance; it also reveals a glaring truth that politicians across Europe have so far ignored. In their efforts to hammer out a second loan agreement for Greece, eurozone ministers are focusing on the differences between bond swaps and bond rollovers, the tensions between Berlin and the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank or how far continental banks can withstand another massive shock. Taken for granted in these negotiations is that the Greeks (and by implication, the Irish and the Portuguese) must accept more austerity. Yet in Athens, whether on the streets or even at a policy-making level, these technical details barely figure on the agenda. It’s not just that the terms are different, the entire debate is too. Here, the argument concerns how much more austerity the Greek economy, its people and even the government can take – because all three are already at breaking point. When Greece was all but locked out of the financial markets last May, Papandreou accepted a €110bn loan from Europe and the IMF. The idea was that the money would tide the country over for a year, in which time his government would at least start sorting out its public finances. For Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy and the rest of Europe, the loan came with some pretty tight strings attached: they charged the Greeks interest well above the official eurozone rate, and set demanding budget targets for the Pasok socialist government. Freefall A year in, and the deal is not working. Greece has been in recession for two years and on official forecasts this will be its third. When I ask Athens University economist Yanis Varoufakis to describe the economy, he shoots back one sentence: “It’s in freefall.” Sitting on the balcony of his flat behind the Acropolis, he throws out some statistics: 50,000 businesses went bankrupt last year, industrial production fell 20% and will drop another 12% this year. Unemployment has surged, so that one in six of the workforce doesn’t have a job. These are the sort of figures associated with a depression, and the predictable result is that the public finances are getting worse. Greece’s debt has ballooned to 153% of GDP; on Varoufakis’s projections, even if ministers manage to make all their promised cuts, the government will owe three times the entire national income. Behind these numbers lie the stories of a society in distress. One man talks about his daughter who works in the in-store restaurant of a large supermarket outside Athens; at closing time, she and her workmates have started giving out the unsold meals to the newly unemployed – the 21st-century equivalent of a soup kitchen. An employee of a local council notes that they pick up 17% less rubbish than a year ago, simply because people have cut back on food. The owner of an art gallery tells me her son has just started his first job; holding a master’s in accountancy, he works six hours a day in a mobile-phone shop. The lazy accusation to hurl at Greece is that it had a bloated public sector and so was bound to come a cropper. Not so, says Varoufakis: the country has a public sector in line with the rest of Europe (although, nearly everyone I speak to agrees, one that does not work as well), but takes in taxes some 35% below where they should be. Wealthy Greeks have always treated the country’s tax system like a church collection plate: what they give is strictly optional. This gap was covered up for as long as the Greek state could get cheap credit; then in 2008 it became glaringly obvious. The other problem covered up during the boom years was the rotting away of the industrial base. That too is now the subject of angry public discussion. I take a tour of the shipbuilding yard in Perama, just outside Athens. Greece has the largest commercial fleet in the world, and yet Perama is utterly silent. There is a rusting hulk, abandoned a few years ago, when those who commissioned it could no longer afford to pay for it. A decade ago, this yard employed 7,000 workers – now it has around 500. There was a time when assembling small cargo vessels was seen as pedestrian work; last year, the yard was contracted to build two boats, and the jobs were fought over. A few minutes away lives Tassos Alexandris, who was laid off from Perama in 2008. The hall of his flat is decorated with needlepoint; inside are pictures of the Virgin Mary put up by his wife, Nikki. She is ill, and his 26-year-old daughter has worked for six months in her entire career. How do they make ends meet? Nikki snorts with laughter. “The electricity connection is inside the flat; otherwise the board would have cut us off,” begins Tassos. His mother-in-law lives upstairs and, while he is too ashamed to ask her for food, she allows him to raid her fridge at night. They had a small green Citroen, but couldn’t afford to keep it. Now he runs a motorbike, although with no plates and no taxes. “I can’t sleep at night for worry,” he says. “It has affected every part of our lives: personal, sexual, the lot.” How many families in this block do they think are in a similar situation? Nikki tots them up: “80%.” Tassos doesn’t just support the protesters of Syntagma; he thinks they will go further. “Don’t be surprised if Athens goes up in flames,” the 50-year old says. “And don’t be sad, either.” His words initially sound melodramatic, but the anger keeps coming up. “Politicians now walk around with bodyguards,” says Aris Chatzistefanou, the co-director of Debtocracy, a film about the Greek crisis that has become a sensation. He quotes a newspaper report of how restaurateurs are taking down those cheesy framed photos of dining politicians, of how one government spokesman went to dinner a few weeks ago only for the rest of the restaurant to start shouting “You are eating the blood of the people”. Political arithmetic The anger against the austerity and the politicians imposing it is palpable; whether it will translate into political success is debatable. Papandreou may be one of the most hated men in Greece, but there is no mainstream politician who has an alternative to acting under creditor’s orders. This isn’t about an electorate taking on a government, either, but the impossible political arithmetic of disparate groups of Greeks on one side versus the IMF, the European Central Bank and 16 other eurozone members on the other. Run that by the protesters of Athens, though, and even the older, more pragmatic ones have an answer. “We may lose,” one grey-haired trade unionist said to me. “But what matters is how you lose.” Greece Europe European debt crisis European banks Europe Aditya Chakrabortty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Alliance says ‘weapons systems failure’ caused strike to miss intended target and may have led to civilian casualties Nato has said it was responsible for an air strike that killed civilians in Tripoli over the weekend. “A military missile site was the intended target of air strikes in Tripoli last night,” a statement said. “However, it appears that one weapon did not strike the intended target and that there may have been a weapons system failure which may have caused a number of civilian casualties.” Earlier the Libyan government had said that one of Nato’s missiles had struck a house in a residential area of Tripoli, killing a number of civilians, including two children. The attack is the biggest blunder by coalition forces during the four-month campaign, at a time when Nato has been trying to increase the tempo of operations against the Libyan leader. “Nato regrets the loss of innocent civilian lives and takes great care in conducting strikes against a regime determined to use violence against its own citizens,” said Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard, commander of Operation Unified Protector. “Although we are still determining the specifics of this event, indications are that a weapons system failure may have caused this incident,” he added. The Guardian understands that investigators are focusing on French aircraft flying over Tripoli to target a potential missile site. RAF planes were not thought involved. Nato was debriefing the pilots who flew sorties, as well as reviewing data from their aircraft. A Nato official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said there was confusion over the exact location, and pointed out that the district in question was an anti-Gaddafi stronghold. Reporters based in Tripoli were taken by government officials to the scene of the blast and then to a hospital, where they were shown the bodies of four people said to have been killed in the strike, including two infants. Associated Press said journalists were escorted back to the site during the day, where children’s toys, teacups and dust-covered mattresses could be seen amid the rubble. Foreign journalists in Tripoli are not allowed to travel and report freely and are almost always shadowed by government minders. Libya’s deputy foreign minister, Khaled Kaim, said: “There was intentional and deliberate targeting of the civilian houses. This is another sign of the brutality of the west.” Nato Libya Middle East Africa Nick Hopkins guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Alliance says ‘weapons systems failure’ caused strike to miss intended target and may have led to civilian casualties Nato has said it was responsible for an air strike that killed civilians in Tripoli over the weekend. “A military missile site was the intended target of air strikes in Tripoli last night,” a statement said. “However, it appears that one weapon did not strike the intended target and that there may have been a weapons system failure which may have caused a number of civilian casualties.” Earlier the Libyan government had said that one of Nato’s missiles had struck a house in a residential area of Tripoli, killing a number of civilians, including two children. The attack is the biggest blunder by coalition forces during the four-month campaign, at a time when Nato has been trying to increase the tempo of operations against the Libyan leader. “Nato regrets the loss of innocent civilian lives and takes great care in conducting strikes against a regime determined to use violence against its own citizens,” said Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard, commander of Operation Unified Protector. “Although we are still determining the specifics of this event, indications are that a weapons system failure may have caused this incident,” he added. The Guardian understands that investigators are focusing on French aircraft flying over Tripoli to target a potential missile site. RAF planes were not thought involved. Nato was debriefing the pilots who flew sorties, as well as reviewing data from their aircraft. A Nato official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said there was confusion over the exact location, and pointed out that the district in question was an anti-Gaddafi stronghold. Reporters based in Tripoli were taken by government officials to the scene of the blast and then to a hospital, where they were shown the bodies of four people said to have been killed in the strike, including two infants. Associated Press said journalists were escorted back to the site during the day, where children’s toys, teacups and dust-covered mattresses could be seen amid the rubble. Foreign journalists in Tripoli are not allowed to travel and report freely and are almost always shadowed by government minders. Libya’s deputy foreign minister, Khaled Kaim, said: “There was intentional and deliberate targeting of the civilian houses. This is another sign of the brutality of the west.” Nato Libya Middle East Africa Nick Hopkins guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Gee, what a surprise: John McCain as the guest on This Week with Christie Amanpour . It’s always him or Liz Cheney every time you watch the Sunday shows, and here it’s a twofer – Liz was on, too, although not in the same segment. Listening to McCain today, I thought of the saying that “Old soldiers never die, they just fade away.” John McCain is one of those old soldiers who’s having a hard time accepting that military might isn’t the best solution to every international problem. (As Defense Secretary Robert Gates has learned.) And he’s certainly savvy enough to know that these wars aren’t really about “standing up for freedom.” He also can’t seem to make the connection that voters understand their lives are directly affected by the amount of money we pour into war: Former Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) took aim at his party for what he called its growing movement towards isolationism, chastising the current GOP presidential field for not supporting U.S. military intervention in Libya and calling for speedy troop withdrawals from Afghanistan. “This is isolationism. There’s always been an isolation strain in the Republican party, that Pat Buchanan wing of our party,” McCain told “This Week” anchor Christiane Amanpour. “But now it seems to have moved more center stage.” At the first major Republican presidential primary debate in New Hampshire last week, several candidates criticized U.S. military involvement in Libya, while on Afghanistan former Mass. Governor Mitt Romney said, “It’s time for us to bring our troops home as soon as we possibly can” based on the advice of military commanders. “I wonder what Ronald Reagan would be saying today?” questioned McCain, saying the isolationism is a stark departure from traditional Republican foreign policy positions. “That is not the Republican party that has been willing to stand up for freedom for people for all over the world.”
Continue reading …White paper to reflect David Cameron’s desire to open up public services to private companies The government is preparing to publish its long-awaited and fiercely contested public services reform white paper and has begun to circulate the finished document – dubbed the “big society bill” – around Whitehall. After intense debate, the legislation, which has been delayed for five months, is earmarked for publication next month and is intended to steady the course of the government’s reform programme after its plans for the NHS were waylaid. In the next few weeks, the legislation will be stress-tested across Whitehall to try to prevent it being beset by the kind of problems surrounding the controversial NHS bill. The “open public services” bill will combine policies that have already been embarked on, including: • An emphasis on personal budgets for social care and healthcare, which allow an individual to spend their funding how they see fit – a measure introduced by the Labour government. In social care, 30% of all patients are on personal budgets and this was already due to reach 100% by 2013. In healthcare, pilots have been under way to roll personal budgets out to patients, which the white paper is likely to accelerate. • Parents of children with special needs can make their own decisions about schooling. • Elderly people can choose how money is spent on their care. • Parish councils can take control of parks, playing fields, parking and traffic restrictions – all mechanisms intended to start to enact David Cameron’s “big society” agenda. A report by the thinktank ResPublica , published on Sunday in the Observer, claimed the big society was failing children, with parks and play schemes closing across the country. The bill’s delay from February has partly been attributed to the need to divert resources to the troubled NHS bill, and partly to ideological differences within government. Cameron laid out his vision for public services in February, saying private companies could have a right to challenge state providers and bid to do the work. He pledged the “decisive end of the old-fashioned, top-down, take-what-you’re-given model of public services”, but came up against opposition from Liberal Democrats. Before Cameron’s article on public service reform, Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg delivered the Guardian public services speech in which he appeared to rule out allowing this to happen saying: “There will be no for-profit providers in our publicly funded schools system.” Since then, Cameron’s director of strategy, Steve Hilton, has been pushing to see his vision implemented fully but his task has been made more difficult by George Osborne, who has been urging caution. It is now thought that the white paper will reflect Cameron and Hilton’s desire to open up provision. A government source said: “The truth is, we’ve already been very radical, for instance on education and welfare, but this will build on that – coming out, we hope, just before recess.” Returning to another of his favourite themes, Cameron marked Father’s Day with a trenchant criticism of runaway dads, saying they should be stigmatised in the same way as drink-drivers. In another front of the big society, the education secretary, Michael Gove, will announce on Monday the progress being made in setting up more free schools. In the application round that closed on 15 June, the Department for Education received 281 applications to set up free schools from September 2012. Of the 281 free school applications received, the current analysis shows that 227 are for mainstream schools and of these applications, 77 (34%) are for primary schools; 81 (36%) for secondary schools; 65 (29%) are for all-through schools and four (2%) are for 16-19 schools. The figures show 5% of applications came from existing academy providers and 56% from local groups. The figures will show that the percentage of applications from independent schools wishing to move into the state sector decreased in this application round, at just 18% of the 227 applications, compared with 35% last year. The percentage of schools characterising themselves as faith schools has also fallen – 29% compared with 40% last year. Gove will claim the applicants say they want to set up schools for a number of reasons – including a basic shortage of school places, to support the most deprived children or to provide a good new local school to address historic academic failure. Speaking ahead of his speech to Policy Exchange, Gove said: “Our critics said it was impossible to open a school in little more than a year. Several will open this September. They told us that schools wouldn’t want to become academies. They are converting at a rate of two every school day.” Ed Miliband reiterated his call for “your neighbour is my neighbour” responsibility across society in a Sunday newspaper interview. “It is not just about earning and owning … but it is also about the fabric of our society,” he said. “What kind of country do we want to create for our kids? Public services policy Public sector cuts David Cameron Public finance Economic policy Economics Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Greek prime minister puts figure on new bailout needs for first time as he struggles to get country behind austerity measures Greece will need a second international financial bailout of the same magnitude as last year’s €110bn (£97bn) lifeline in order to avoid a tumultuous debt default, the prime minister, George Papandreou, has conceded while mounting a last-ditch appeal to parliament and the nation to back his austerity programme. Appealing for a vote of confidence in his newly reshuffled government, the Socialist party leader warned that without further aid from the EU and IMF, Athens’s cash reserves would soon run out, inviting a financial crisis that European officials have warned would rapidly contaminate the international financial system. “I ask for a vote of confidence because we are at a critical juncture,” said Papandreou in a speech opening a marathon parliamentary debate that culminates with the crucial vote on Tuesday. The sacrifices required for that aid – more cost-cutting, more tax increases, job losses and massive privatisations – were infinitely better than default, he said, as thousands of austerity-weary Greeks protested outside the 300-seat parliament. “The debt and deficits are national problems that have brought Greece into a state of [diminished sovereignty], one that may have protected us from bankruptcy, but which we need to get out of. The consequences of a violent bankruptcy, or exit from the euro, would be immediately catastrophic for households, the banks and the country’s credibility … the sacrifices people are making are paying off,” he said. It was the first time that Papandreou or any Greek official had broached the subject of how big the new bailout would be. The admission, after weeks of speculation over the size of the package, highlighted the parlous state of the country’s economy despite receiving regular cash injections from the €110bn rescue agreed last May, the biggest bailout in western history. Athens’s debt, which stood at €340bn in December, was estimated to have exceeded €355bn, the equivalent of 150% of GDP, in April. By comparison, the government’s annual income is almost one-tenth of that, at around €40bn. Papandreou called the vote after a first attempt to pass new austerity measures in return for the aid met with fierce opposition from his own Pasok party. After a flurry of defections and the collapse of talks aimed at forming a coalition government, he moved ahead with a radical reshuffle of his cabinet, appointing Evangelos Venizelos, a party heavyweight and political rival, as finance minister to navigate Greece through its worst crisis in modern times. A poll published in the To Vima newspaper showed that around 47% of Greeks are vehemently opposed to the new €28bn cost-cutting plan whose centrepiece is an ambitious privatisation drive that aims to raise an additional €50bn for the cash-strapped state by 2015. Before attending his first summit of eurozone finance ministers in Luxembourg where the details of a new three-year rescue deal for Greece were discussedon Sunday, Venizelos promised austerity measures will be meted out fairly. But public anger is still building on the street – tens of thousands of Greeks were expected last night to gather outside parliament in protest – and unions are preparing a storm of strikes. In an attempt to placate voters, who increasingly have come to identify Greece’s politicians with corruption, he pledged to call a referendum on changes to the “political system” later this year. Reforms would include an overhaul of the constitution and abolishing practices such as the immunity enjoyed by MPs, a source of the discontent that has prompted protestors to scream “thieves” outside parliament as the debt drama has unfolded. The conservative opposition leader, Antonis Samaras, called for Papandreou to step down to pave the way for elections and a renegotiation of the bailout. But Papandreou called for the opposition to “stop fighting in these critical times, stop sending the image that the country is being torn apart”. Greece Europe European debt crisis European banks European Central Bank Europe Euro Currencies Euro European Union Economics Helena Smith guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Former Labour business secretary also says that unions should stop threatening strikes and that people need to ‘face reality’ The former Labour business secretary charged by the coalition with overseeing its contentious pensions reforms has called on his party leader to back his plans and ask union leaders to stop threatening strikes. Lord Hutton said people had to face the “reality” that public sector pension reform was necessary and that strikes would not “make this problem go away”. When asked if Ed Miliband should oppose the threat of industrial action by the unions that backed him to become party leader, Hutton said “of course”. He also said he would like to see Miliband endorse his report. The government and unions have been at loggerheads since the end of last week when ministers went public with plans to extend the retirement age and increase pension contributions for millions of public sector workers. Union leaders felt that ministers had pre-empted negotiations with the announcement. The head of Unison, Dave Prentis, and other union leaders threatened the biggest wave of industrial action since the general strike of 1926 after the chief secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, made the announcement on Friday. The Treasury later said that Alexander was articulating proposals for reform, not settled government policy, but Prentis said that Alexander’s speech had effectively rendered the talks meaningless. Despite making conciliatory noises, Alexander said that the government had “contingency plans” in the event of a major strike. Shadow chancellor Ed Balls warned trade unions not to fall into George Osborne’s “trap” by striking. The chancellor was hoping for the unions to embark on industrial action, Balls said, so that he could blame any weak economic recovery on walkouts. “This is not a political decision from the unions, this is actually their members feeling very upset. George Osborne is desperate to have that confrontation – he’s been saying it for months. The trade unions must not walk into the trap of giving George Osborne the confrontation he wants to divert attention from a failing economy.” His party colleague Hutton disagreed with Balls, telling BBC1′s Politics Show: “There are still negotiations going on and those negotiations should continue. “I don’t personally believe that ministers want to provoke a confrontation with the trade unions – quite the opposite, I think they’re trying to find an agreement. “It’s an uncomfortable truth, but I’m afraid it’s the reality, that the world is changing around us and people are living for much longer, and we have not been paying for those extra years of pensions – the taxpayer has. Strikes won’t make this problem go away, we have to act now. If we don’t act now, it’s our kids who are going to pick up the tab, and it’s not right.” Asked whether he would like to see Labour leader Ed Miliband back his recommendations, Lord Hutton replied: “I’d like him to endorse the report I produced, yes, because I think it does strike the only fair balance.” It also emerged today that the coalition may consider softening changes to women’s pensions after facing a revolt from Tory and Lib Dem MPs. The government would like to increase the age at which women qualify for a state pension from 60 to 65 by 2018, two years earlier than planned by the Labour government. Ministerial talks are supposed to be taking place, with Iain Duncan Smith said to be sympathetic, but in public he will tomorrow say the government is determined. At the second reading of the pensions bill, Duncan Smith will tell MPs that delaying the increase in the state pension age would cost the public finances £10bn. He is expected to say: “We’re heading towards an unprecedented burden being placed on the next generation who will have to pay for their parents’ retirement on top of paying for the national debt. It’s not fair. This bill will address the realities of our increasing longevity by sharing the costs between the generations. We will stand by the 2018 and 2020 timetable.” Three unions are due to strike on 30 June, but the Association of Teachers and Lecturers has said it will call off the walkout if the government is willing to discuss the level of increases to pension contributions. Mark Serwotka of the Public and Commercial Services Union , which represents almost 300,000 civil servants, told the BBC it was very unlikely that the walkout would be called off. Responding to Balls’s warning of a “trap”, Serwotka said: “The problem with what Ed is saying is this: if he’s me, representing people, many of whom are on £15,000 per year – they work hard, they’re on poverty pay, they don’t look forward to a very big pension. If all of that’s being taken away and you work longer, pay more and get less, what frankly are we supposed to do? Are we supposed to sit back, say it’s unfair and do nothing?” Prentis, whose union represents people working for local authorities, the NHS, colleges and the police, said he had not yet balloted his members on action but would if they continued “to be treated with disdain”. “If we go back into negotiations on the basis of dialogue but no changes in the proposals, what’s the point in that?” he told the BBC. “If we can get an assurance that the talks are meaningful … then obviously we’d continue the talks, but we didn’t get that impression on Friday.” Responding to the same suggestion by Balls, Prentis said striking methods would be “smarter”. He told Sky’s Murnaghan programme, “It won’t be like the miners’ dispute where we will be starved back into submission. This will be a lot smarter than that – this will be about regional action, branch action, this will be sustained action. Because I believe that this government will not turn after one or two days, and our members have got to be prepared for that, and I believe that they are.” Alexander said the government was “absolutely not” trying to provoke a battle with unions. “There is a huge amount of room for dialogue,” he told Sky News. “There is a huge amount of detail about public sector pensions that we’ve been discussing in the talks … and we need to take that forward over the coming months.” He insisted the talks could still be constructive, adding: “I don’t think my message is uncompromising at all.” John Cridland, director of the CBI , dismissed the impact that public sector union strikes could have. He said: “Today the most they can do is disrupt people’s lives – it probably won’t disrupt the economy.” Public sector pensions John Hutton Ed Miliband Public sector cuts Public services policy Public sector pay Public finance Pensions Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Former Labour business secretary also says that unions should stop threatening strikes and that people need to ‘face reality’ The former Labour business secretary charged by the coalition with overseeing its contentious pensions reforms has called on his party leader to back his plans and ask union leaders to stop threatening strikes. Lord Hutton said people had to face the “reality” that public sector pension reform was necessary and that strikes would not “make this problem go away”. When asked if Ed Miliband should oppose the threat of industrial action by the unions that backed him to become party leader, Hutton said “of course”. He also said he would like to see Miliband endorse his report. The government and unions have been at loggerheads since the end of last week when ministers went public with plans to extend the retirement age and increase pension contributions for millions of public sector workers. Union leaders felt that ministers had pre-empted negotiations with the announcement. The head of Unison, Dave Prentis, and other union leaders threatened the biggest wave of industrial action since the general strike of 1926 after the chief secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, made the announcement on Friday. The Treasury later said that Alexander was articulating proposals for reform, not settled government policy, but Prentis said that Alexander’s speech had effectively rendered the talks meaningless. Despite making conciliatory noises, Alexander said that the government had “contingency plans” in the event of a major strike. Shadow chancellor Ed Balls warned trade unions not to fall into George Osborne’s “trap” by striking. The chancellor was hoping for the unions to embark on industrial action, Balls said, so that he could blame any weak economic recovery on walkouts. “This is not a political decision from the unions, this is actually their members feeling very upset. George Osborne is desperate to have that confrontation – he’s been saying it for months. The trade unions must not walk into the trap of giving George Osborne the confrontation he wants to divert attention from a failing economy.” His party colleague Hutton disagreed with Balls, telling BBC1′s Politics Show: “There are still negotiations going on and those negotiations should continue. “I don’t personally believe that ministers want to provoke a confrontation with the trade unions – quite the opposite, I think they’re trying to find an agreement. “It’s an uncomfortable truth, but I’m afraid it’s the reality, that the world is changing around us and people are living for much longer, and we have not been paying for those extra years of pensions – the taxpayer has. Strikes won’t make this problem go away, we have to act now. If we don’t act now, it’s our kids who are going to pick up the tab, and it’s not right.” Asked whether he would like to see Labour leader Ed Miliband back his recommendations, Lord Hutton replied: “I’d like him to endorse the report I produced, yes, because I think it does strike the only fair balance.” It also emerged today that the coalition may consider softening changes to women’s pensions after facing a revolt from Tory and Lib Dem MPs. The government would like to increase the age at which women qualify for a state pension from 60 to 65 by 2018, two years earlier than planned by the Labour government. Ministerial talks are supposed to be taking place, with Iain Duncan Smith said to be sympathetic, but in public he will tomorrow say the government is determined. At the second reading of the pensions bill, Duncan Smith will tell MPs that delaying the increase in the state pension age would cost the public finances £10bn. He is expected to say: “We’re heading towards an unprecedented burden being placed on the next generation who will have to pay for their parents’ retirement on top of paying for the national debt. It’s not fair. This bill will address the realities of our increasing longevity by sharing the costs between the generations. We will stand by the 2018 and 2020 timetable.” Three unions are due to strike on 30 June, but the Association of Teachers and Lecturers has said it will call off the walkout if the government is willing to discuss the level of increases to pension contributions. Mark Serwotka of the Public and Commercial Services Union , which represents almost 300,000 civil servants, told the BBC it was very unlikely that the walkout would be called off. Responding to Balls’s warning of a “trap”, Serwotka said: “The problem with what Ed is saying is this: if he’s me, representing people, many of whom are on £15,000 per year – they work hard, they’re on poverty pay, they don’t look forward to a very big pension. If all of that’s being taken away and you work longer, pay more and get less, what frankly are we supposed to do? Are we supposed to sit back, say it’s unfair and do nothing?” Prentis, whose union represents people working for local authorities, the NHS, colleges and the police, said he had not yet balloted his members on action but would if they continued “to be treated with disdain”. “If we go back into negotiations on the basis of dialogue but no changes in the proposals, what’s the point in that?” he told the BBC. “If we can get an assurance that the talks are meaningful … then obviously we’d continue the talks, but we didn’t get that impression on Friday.” Responding to the same suggestion by Balls, Prentis said striking methods would be “smarter”. He told Sky’s Murnaghan programme, “It won’t be like the miners’ dispute where we will be starved back into submission. This will be a lot smarter than that – this will be about regional action, branch action, this will be sustained action. Because I believe that this government will not turn after one or two days, and our members have got to be prepared for that, and I believe that they are.” Alexander said the government was “absolutely not” trying to provoke a battle with unions. “There is a huge amount of room for dialogue,” he told Sky News. “There is a huge amount of detail about public sector pensions that we’ve been discussing in the talks … and we need to take that forward over the coming months.” He insisted the talks could still be constructive, adding: “I don’t think my message is uncompromising at all.” John Cridland, director of the CBI , dismissed the impact that public sector union strikes could have. He said: “Today the most they can do is disrupt people’s lives – it probably won’t disrupt the economy.” Public sector pensions John Hutton Ed Miliband Public sector cuts Public services policy Public sector pay Public finance Pensions Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …I tell you, Klassy with a “K”, these GOPers : Barack Obama impersonator Reggie Brown was a surprise guest at the Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans. Brown took the stage to laughter a few shouts of “Where’s your birth certificate?” Hoo! That’s a knee-slapper there! Hey, remember when liberals couldn’t criticize the president in a time of war because that made meant the terrorists won? But then it got better when Brown devolved into racist jokes…no, seriously. Prior to a speech by RNC Chair Reince Preibus, an Obama impersonator took the stage and told a series of racist jokes. A summary from Arron Blake : • On Black History Month: “Michelle celebrates the full month. I celebrate half.” • “My mother loved a black man,” but “she was not a Kardashian.” • A picture was shown of Obama and the first lady when he took office. The impersonator then showed a picture of what the Obamas will look like when the president leaves office, and it was the characters of Fred Sanford and his sister-in-law, Ethel, from the show “Sanford and Son.”Doug Heye, the RNC’s communication director in 2010 tweeted: “Wonder why many minorities have problems with GOP? Hiring Obama impersonator to tell ‘black jokes’ at SRLC, for starters .”
Continue reading …