Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 806)
Israel accused of trying to intimidate Gaza flotilla journalists

Foreign Press Association urges Israel to withdraw threat of 10-year ban against journalists travelling with flotilla The Foreign Press Association has accused the Israeli government of using “threats and intimidation” to stop media coverage of a 10-ship flotilla due to sail to the Gaza Strip this week. The ships are sailing to protest against Israeli restrictions on Gaza and to commemorate last year’s flotilla, which was intercepted by the Israeli navy, who killed nine of the Turkish participants. Israel has restricted the supply of goods and the movement of individuals in Gaza since Hamas took control in 2007. Two of the ships, the Tahrir and the Audacity of Hope, are docked in Athens, where the harbourmaster has banned the latter from leaving port until its seaworthiness is established. Some of the other ships, including the Irish ship Saoirse, have already set sail from European ports. The ships are expected to meet in the Mediterranean before approaching Gaza later this week. The flotilla is expected to carry up to 500 passengers. A Dutch-Italian boat will carry three members of the European parliament and one member of the Israeli parliament. Passengers on the Audacity of Hope include the author Alice Walker and Hedy Epstein, an 87-year-old Holocaust survivor. Passengers have been undergoing training in non-violent resistance techniques and instruction in what to expect if Israeli soldiers board their ship. They have also been provided with T-shirts with the message “Unarmed Civilian”. Israel has been engaged in a diplomatic campaign to prevent the flotilla from setting sail. Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, said last week that the flotilla was not “useful” and consular officials tried to persuade US nationals in Athens not to join the flotilla. On Sunday Israel warned journalists, who will make up a minority of the passengers, not to travel with the flotilla. In a letter to editors, Oren Helman, the director of the government press office, wrote that the flotilla had been organised by western and Islamist extremists: “The flotilla intends to knowingly violate the blockade that has been declared legally and is in accordance with all treaties and international law.” He said journalists who participated in the flotilla would be breaking Israeli law and would be banned from Israel for 10 years, as well as facing confiscation of equipment and other measures. The Foreign Press Association, which represents the international media in Israel, said the threat to punish journalists covering the Gaza flotilla raised serious questions about Israel’s commitment to freedom of the press. “Journalists covering a legitimate news event should be allowed to do their jobs without threats and intimidation. We urge the government to reverse its decision immediately,” it said. Gaza flotilla Israel Gaza Palestinian territories Middle East Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Chris Wallace Strikes Back At Jon Stewart: Hannity and O’Reilly’s Viewers Better Informed Than Daily Show’s

Chris Wallace told Don Imus Thursday he intended to fully respond to the fallout from last week's interview with Jon Stewart. True to his word, at the conclusion of the most recent “Fox News Sunday,” Wallace struck back at Stewart's claim that Fox watchers are the most misinformed media viewers by demonstrating that folks who watch “Hannity” and “The O'Reilly Factor” were actually better informed than “Daily Show” viewers (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS WALLACE, HOST: Now, the surprising fallout from our interview last Sunday with Jon Stewart. I figured it would get some reaction, but not that it would light up the internet. One of Jon’s arguments was that the bias of the mainstream media is not to push a liberal agenda. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) JON STEWART: The bias of the mainstream media is toward sensationalism, conflict, and laziness. (END VIDEO CLIP) WALLACE: The Huffington Post seemed to approve that Sunday afternoon when it ran this headline that seemed more appropriate to a declaration of war. Then on Monday, Stewart led his show by complaining about the editing of our interview. True, we did cut our 24-minute conversation down to fourteen. But we posted the full interview on our website. That's the only reason you could see it. I was more surprised by Jon’s claim we left out the take-away moment: the moment where I gave away the game. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) STEWART: Do you believe that Fox News is exactly the ideological equivalent of… WALLACE: I think we're the counterweight. STEWART: …of NBC News? WALLACE: I think we're the counterweight. STEWART: You believe that? WALLACE: I think that they have a liberal agenda and we tell the other side of the story. (END VIDEO CLIP) WALLACE: But I made exactly the same point in the interview we ran on the air. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) WALLACE: I don't think our viewers are the least bit disappointed with us. I think our viewers think finally they're getting somebody who tells the other side of the story. (END VIDEO CLIP) WALLACE: Jon seemed to think that was a big deal, that I said we tell the other side of the story. While I wish I had said the full story, here is what I meant. As we showed today, we don’t go easy on Republicans. But we try to provide a fuller perspective. For instance, pointing out the strengths and some of the problems with ObamaCare before anyone else did. But let me give you a classic example of what “fair and balanced” means to me. After Hurricane Katrina, the mainstream media piled on FEMA for the failure to respond to the crisis. And the federal government did a lousy job. But it was Fox News that started reporting on the failure of the first responders, the city of New Orleans, and the state of Louisiana to help people. Yes, we reported FEMA’s problems, but we also told the other side of the story. And then there was the most heated moment of the interview. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) STEWART: Who is the most consistently misinformed media viewers, the most consistently misinformed? Fox. Fox viewers. Consistently. Every poll. (END VIDEO CLIP) WALLACE: The Pulitzer Prize-winning website PolitiFact looked into that statement, and on its Truth-O-Meter it rated Jon’s claim false. But the details are even more interesting. In a survey called “Misinformation in the 2010 Election,” people were asked a series of fact questions like which president signed tarp? But the poll also asked questions like this. “As you know, the American economy had a major downturn starting in the fall of 2008. Do you think that now the American economy is ‘a,’ starting to recover or ‘b,’ still getting worse?” “Starting to recover” was the so-called right answer. If you said, “still getting worse” you were officially misinformed. And if you questioned whether climate change is occurring or whether ObamaCare will add to deficit, you were also mistaken. Then there was last year's Pew Poll which asked four fact questions like what job did Eric Holder have? It turns out Fox News scored better, not worse, than MSNBC, CNN, the network evening news and the network morning news. As for individual shows, 31 percent of “Hannity” viewers got all four questions correct. 29 percent for “O'Reilly.” And all the way down near the bottom viewers of Jon Stewart’s “Daily Show” at 22 percent. So folks, all that talk about you’re the most consistently misinformed viewers? I guess the joke is on Jon Stewart. Indeed it is. Bravo, Chris! Bravo!

Continue reading …
Libya unveils its latest weapon against Nato: women at arms

More than 500 females of various ages armed to the teeth and swearing loyalty are paraded in front of international media Screaming and chanting his name, the 500 women and girls vowed their undying love for one man. Not a pop star or Hollywood actor, but Libya’s Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. “Kill all the people in Libya first, then come for Muammar Gaddafi,” said 14-year-old Fatima Hassan. “I will kill myself if Muammar Gaddafi is killed. I know our people will kill themselves if he dies.” The event in Tripoli on Sunday was billed as a graduation ceremony for women who had been given weapons training in defence of the regime. Around 50 international journalists, invited and escorted by government minders, arrived to find them clapping, singing, ululating, punching the air and waving green flags in a tented hall set up with chandeliers and two colossal flatscreen TVs. There were elderly women and little girls in the hall, and every age in between. Some held aloft pictures of a luminous Gaddafi, one framed in green Christmas tinsel. A woman waved a green flag and wore a sparkly green cape, green scarf and green bandana with badges showing Gaddafi’s face. Next to her was a woman wearing a watch that displayed his image. Reporters pondered whether the event had been stage managed entirely for their benefit. The Gaddafi groupies painted the first dozen rows green, but behind them were hundreds of empty seats. Outside was a rattle of gunfire as some enthusiastic graduates fired their new weapons into the air with little regard for where the ammunition might land. There was also much idolatry, most of all from the teenager Fatima, who said her father is an engineer and she attended an international school near Edgware Road in London. “We love Muammar Gaddafi and we want to save our country,” she said. “He made us happy. He makes us eat and makes the country free to do what we want. Before, we weren’t free. My grandparents tell us that before Gaddafi, it was bad, there was no bread. He saved us.” Pledging to fight for the man depicted on her necklace, she explained: “There are no women and children now.” Fatima claimed her five brothers have gone to fight for the regime against rebels in Benghazi and Misrata. Asked how she would feel if they were killed, she replied: “It doesn’t matter. I don’t care. It’s for the leader.” With government minders hovering nearby, there was similar fervour from Habib Abdul Qasem, 39, a nanny dressed in military fatigues. “Of course I will defend myself and my country,” she said. “We are an armed nation; everyone in this country has weapons. I keep a gun in my house. I’ve never used it but if the conditions change I will use it against the Crusasders.” Nadia Ali, 30, an unemployed interior designer, added: “We want a Libya that’s strong. Muammar Gaddafi is our father. There is some problem in the rebels’ head. Muammar Gaddafi is a good man who loves the Libyan people. He gave us something.” Gaddafi’s detail of female bodyguards has become the stuff of legend during his near 42-year rule. It is not yet clear what role the newly-trained women will play militarily and whether they could be pressed into action if the Libyan army is overstretched. Moussa Ibrahim, a government spokesman, said: “Libyan women are now joining the armed forces against Nato. We are training them. Their main role is defending homes. We have no plan to send them to the front line. They are not trained for that, and our army is very effective.” But he added with a rhetorical flourish: “We are going to make sure that every mother, the symbol of love and creation, is a bomb, a killing machine.” Ibrahim insisted that the regime is stronger than ever and there has been no discussion of surrender. “We are prepared to give 1.2m weapons away and we have been training many, many, many ordinary Libyans.” The set piece over, journalists were shepherded back to their official bus, but it remained stationary for long minutes as the celebratory gunfire came ever closer. There was growing anxiety on board over the potential for stray bullets. When this was expressed to a government minder, he replied tartly: “Your planes are bombing the Libyan people and you are afraid of a bullet?” Libya Middle East Middle East Muammar Gaddafi David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Some Straight Talk from Van Jones and Jared Bernstein on Republican Games With the Raising the Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media After Van Jones gave his speeches both at Netroots Nation 2011 and with his Rebuild the Dream movement , I was glad to see him get some air time on MSNBC to talk about the political games the Republicans are playing with their hostage taking on raising the debt ceiling. We’d be well served if we had more of their Democratic counterparts speaking this clearly and succinctly as Jones and former adviser to Vice President Joe Biden, Jared Bernstein did here. I really liked Jones’ hand grenade analogy on Medicare. I actually think the Republicans are cynical enough to try to force the Democrats to make cuts to the program and then try to run against them on it in 2012 and hope that the public is uninformed enough along with a complicit media that would help with that factor for them to get away with it. As Jones noted, they need to get out there and defend the program if they don’t want that hand grenade to blow up in their face. I don’t know about anyone else, but as someone who has been following this issue, I’m sick to death of the Republicans throwing temper tantrums and telling the public that they’d be willing to let the world’s economy crash if they don’t get their way on tax cuts whether it be Cantor or McConnell of any of the rest of them. It’s long past time for the majority of our media to start calling out these hostage takers if they would like to still have a country worth living in, and not one in the middle of another depression, which there’s some argument about whether we’re already there now. For far too many Americans sadly, we may as well be. O’DONNELL: In the House, they walked out of the budget negotiations. Cantor, simply because they were talking about tax expenditures. No one, the Democrats, the Vice President, no one was talking about raising income tax rates of any kind, just going after the expenditures. BERNSTEIN: That is a key point, that is a key, I wrote about that on my blog today. It’s a key point. No one was, the thing that you hear Republicans inveigh against the most and the conservative supply side theory economist, the thing they inveigh against the most is an increase in tax rates, but if you broaden the base and close loopholes, you’re not increasing rates. And so that’s the way, that’s the direction that this panel needs to head now I think. O’DONNELL: Van, Sen. Chuck Schumer said today that they were looking at possibilities in Medicare, the what they call the delivery system in Medicare. There might be some ways to shave things there. Not cuts that would in any way affect beneficiaries. This is the kind of cuts that Democrats have done many times before. President Clinton did $200 billion in that his first six months in office, he did a big Medicare cut, but it was all on the provider side of the equation. If the Democrats go into Medicare in that way, will that undercut any of the argument they’ve been making against Paul Ryan? JONES: You know, we’re going to have to get all the way through this process, because I will say this. Somebody throws you a hand grenade, you can try to fiddle with it, or you can throw it back. And part of the problem is, that we get so earnest trying to figure out, well maybe we can do this, maybe we can do that, and we are holding the hand grenade they want us to hold. Here’s the bottom line, Medicare, the main threat to Medicare, is coming from the Republican Party, that’s the main threat. And Democrats need to stand up and defend the basic principles of this program, which is a sound program. When we begin to accept the terms of debate of the other side and start to fool around and fiddle with the hand grenade, we always wind up with the explosion in our face. O’DONNELL: Jared Bernstein, have the Democrats accepted, as Van says, too many of the terms of the debate set by the other side? BERNSTEIN: Look, the Democrats have held fast on this issue of revenues. Someone who makes an argument that the Democrats have been spineless and self-negotiating and folded too soon, I don’t think they can make that case here. Because I think the Democrats, President Obama, Vice President Biden, everyday I read in the paper that they’re holding fast on the revenue piece of this. And that’s critical. And when they sat down at the table, they didn’t have a fifty fifty spending cut revenue plan. They actually had three dollars in spending cuts to one dollar of revenue. So they’ve been bargaining in good faith from the very beginning. JONES: That’s what we think. O’DONNELL: What do you do when Republicans say, alright, we’ve talked about what we want to talk about, spending cuts. We may have reached a few tentative areas of agreement, just not specific agreements, but now, if you want to talk about revenues, you want to talk about anything involving the tax code, we’re leaving. How do you have the next conversation with them? JONES: Well, I tell you what. I think that the American people, ordinary folks, I’ve been out in the country, we just launched this new campaign called RebuildTheDream.com. The whole point of it is, most Americans get it. They know we’re going to have to have a more balanced approach. The polls show it that we can’t just have this lopsided cut, cut, cut. You know, frankly, the private sector already imposed an austerity program on us, that was Wall Street, the crash, it’s called the great recession. We don’t need a public austerity program imposed upon us on top of the private sector austerity program. What we need to do is to make sure that we have a balanced approach going forward. And I think that the pain that ordinary people are going through already in the country, these veterans who are coming home to no jobs, no hope and nothing, these kids who are graduating this spring into the worst job market in two generations, homeowners who are underwater desperately, and these banks that we rescued won’t even let them renegotiate the principals or the rates, that level of pain, needs to be heard from in Washington D.C. and instead what we hear is, we’re going to destroy Medicare and if you to raise one penny more of revenue from the richest people in America, we’re going to walk out on you. And you and I both know, we can deal with the deficit, just by within ten years, just by going back to Bill Clinton’s good, smart tax policies and military expenditure levels and we’d be done. So my concern is this point. If we have these kind of shenanigans going on in Washington D.C. and the American people are hurting, that at some point we’re going to have to stand up and bring some good wisdom and get this back to Washington D.C. O’DONNELL: Jared a quick last word. BERNSTEIN: I couldn’t agree more. I mean, it’s the wisdom of the American people that ultimately have to solve this deal. You know the Paul Ryan budget takes $3 trillion from low income programs and gives a trillion dollars to the richest people who are already the only ones who are actually doing okay right now. I can’t imagine why that’s okay with people when they know what it’s really about. Those twenty plus million on and underemployed people, I guarantee you there’s a number of tea parties in that group too. It’s time for the politicians to hear from the American people that this behavior is wholly unacceptable. Sit down at the table. Get the deal done. Get past the debt ceiling and get back to work.

Continue reading …
Some Straight Talk from Van Jones and Jared Bernstein on Republican Games With the Raising the Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media After Van Jones gave his speeches both at Netroots Nation 2011 and with his Rebuild the Dream movement , I was glad to see him get some air time on MSNBC to talk about the political games the Republicans are playing with their hostage taking on raising the debt ceiling. We’d be well served if we had more of their Democratic counterparts speaking this clearly and succinctly as Jones and former adviser to Vice President Joe Biden, Jared Bernstein did here. I really liked Jones’ hand grenade analogy on Medicare. I actually think the Republicans are cynical enough to try to force the Democrats to make cuts to the program and then try to run against them on it in 2012 and hope that the public is uninformed enough along with a complicit media that would help with that factor for them to get away with it. As Jones noted, they need to get out there and defend the program if they don’t want that hand grenade to blow up in their face. I don’t know about anyone else, but as someone who has been following this issue, I’m sick to death of the Republicans throwing temper tantrums and telling the public that they’d be willing to let the world’s economy crash if they don’t get their way on tax cuts whether it be Cantor or McConnell of any of the rest of them. It’s long past time for the majority of our media to start calling out these hostage takers if they would like to still have a country worth living in, and not one in the middle of another depression, which there’s some argument about whether we’re already there now. For far too many Americans sadly, we may as well be. O’DONNELL: In the House, they walked out of the budget negotiations. Cantor, simply because they were talking about tax expenditures. No one, the Democrats, the Vice President, no one was talking about raising income tax rates of any kind, just going after the expenditures. BERNSTEIN: That is a key point, that is a key, I wrote about that on my blog today. It’s a key point. No one was, the thing that you hear Republicans inveigh against the most and the conservative supply side theory economist, the thing they inveigh against the most is an increase in tax rates, but if you broaden the base and close loopholes, you’re not increasing rates. And so that’s the way, that’s the direction that this panel needs to head now I think. O’DONNELL: Van, Sen. Chuck Schumer said today that they were looking at possibilities in Medicare, the what they call the delivery system in Medicare. There might be some ways to shave things there. Not cuts that would in any way affect beneficiaries. This is the kind of cuts that Democrats have done many times before. President Clinton did $200 billion in that his first six months in office, he did a big Medicare cut, but it was all on the provider side of the equation. If the Democrats go into Medicare in that way, will that undercut any of the argument they’ve been making against Paul Ryan? JONES: You know, we’re going to have to get all the way through this process, because I will say this. Somebody throws you a hand grenade, you can try to fiddle with it, or you can throw it back. And part of the problem is, that we get so earnest trying to figure out, well maybe we can do this, maybe we can do that, and we are holding the hand grenade they want us to hold. Here’s the bottom line, Medicare, the main threat to Medicare, is coming from the Republican Party, that’s the main threat. And Democrats need to stand up and defend the basic principles of this program, which is a sound program. When we begin to accept the terms of debate of the other side and start to fool around and fiddle with the hand grenade, we always wind up with the explosion in our face. O’DONNELL: Jared Bernstein, have the Democrats accepted, as Van says, too many of the terms of the debate set by the other side? BERNSTEIN: Look, the Democrats have held fast on this issue of revenues. Someone who makes an argument that the Democrats have been spineless and self-negotiating and folded too soon, I don’t think they can make that case here. Because I think the Democrats, President Obama, Vice President Biden, everyday I read in the paper that they’re holding fast on the revenue piece of this. And that’s critical. And when they sat down at the table, they didn’t have a fifty fifty spending cut revenue plan. They actually had three dollars in spending cuts to one dollar of revenue. So they’ve been bargaining in good faith from the very beginning. JONES: That’s what we think. O’DONNELL: What do you do when Republicans say, alright, we’ve talked about what we want to talk about, spending cuts. We may have reached a few tentative areas of agreement, just not specific agreements, but now, if you want to talk about revenues, you want to talk about anything involving the tax code, we’re leaving. How do you have the next conversation with them? JONES: Well, I tell you what. I think that the American people, ordinary folks, I’ve been out in the country, we just launched this new campaign called RebuildTheDream.com. The whole point of it is, most Americans get it. They know we’re going to have to have a more balanced approach. The polls show it that we can’t just have this lopsided cut, cut, cut. You know, frankly, the private sector already imposed an austerity program on us, that was Wall Street, the crash, it’s called the great recession. We don’t need a public austerity program imposed upon us on top of the private sector austerity program. What we need to do is to make sure that we have a balanced approach going forward. And I think that the pain that ordinary people are going through already in the country, these veterans who are coming home to no jobs, no hope and nothing, these kids who are graduating this spring into the worst job market in two generations, homeowners who are underwater desperately, and these banks that we rescued won’t even let them renegotiate the principals or the rates, that level of pain, needs to be heard from in Washington D.C. and instead what we hear is, we’re going to destroy Medicare and if you to raise one penny more of revenue from the richest people in America, we’re going to walk out on you. And you and I both know, we can deal with the deficit, just by within ten years, just by going back to Bill Clinton’s good, smart tax policies and military expenditure levels and we’d be done. So my concern is this point. If we have these kind of shenanigans going on in Washington D.C. and the American people are hurting, that at some point we’re going to have to stand up and bring some good wisdom and get this back to Washington D.C. O’DONNELL: Jared a quick last word. BERNSTEIN: I couldn’t agree more. I mean, it’s the wisdom of the American people that ultimately have to solve this deal. You know the Paul Ryan budget takes $3 trillion from low income programs and gives a trillion dollars to the richest people who are already the only ones who are actually doing okay right now. I can’t imagine why that’s okay with people when they know what it’s really about. Those twenty plus million on and underemployed people, I guarantee you there’s a number of tea parties in that group too. It’s time for the politicians to hear from the American people that this behavior is wholly unacceptable. Sit down at the table. Get the deal done. Get past the debt ceiling and get back to work.

Continue reading …
Gay Girl in Damascus hoaxer accused of defending himself with new persona

Tom MacMaster says complimentary anonymous commenter in online forum using same IP address was friend who was visiting Tom MacMaster, the US graduate student behind the Gay Girl in Damascus blog hoax , has been accused of creating another fake Arab female online identity to defend his own reputation online. A comment on the website Mondoweiss under the name “Miriam Umm Ibni”, mounting a spirited defence of MacMaster’s conduct in posing as “Amina”, a lesbian Syrian woman, was traced by fellow users to the same IP address in Edinburgh that he used for the Amina hoax. The Guardian has seen screengrabs of the IP data, emailed by one of the site’s hosts Adam Horowitz, that show the post originated from the address 188.74.64.53. Journalists, bloggers and web users unmasked MacMaster earlier this month as the unlikely hoaxer behind the Amina blog, in part after its posts were traced to the address. In an email, later posted on the site, MacMaster acknowledged that “Miriam Umm Ibni” was a fake identity, but denied being behind it, saying a “friend of mine who would really like to remain nameless” had posted the comment in his defence. It came from the same IP address because she had been staying with his wife and him, he wrote. “Like many of my friends, many of whom are committed pro-Palestinian, anti-war and anti-colonialist activists, she was outraged by some of the slanders made against me online. And, like many of my friends, she’s been urged by me to defend me. She did so. She’s that kind of person.” MacMaster said he had received death threats after being exposed as the Amina blogger, who shot to international attention after he wrote a post , posing as the blogger’s cousin, saying “she” had been kidnapped by Syrian security forces. “Some people, I suppose, are angry at the uniqueness of their experience being called into question when someone can successfully impersonate that voice. Others question the ‘right’ of a simple non-Arab goy [a Jewish name for a non-Jewish person] to speak on these issues in any form. Still others have trouble understanding the concept of fiction.” He added that he had “signed an agreement forswearing all use of sockpuppets”. Contacted directly by the Guardian, MacMaster declined by email to explain the circumstances further, saying only that he was “committed to maintaining all confidences that were given to me in either personae and will continue to do so”. He also declined to elaborate on the details of the “agreement” or why he considered it binding. Mondoweiss describes itself as “a news website devoted to covering American foreign policy in the Middle East, chiefly from a progressive Jewish perspective”. The post on which the comment appeared argued “that western audiences will only embrace Arab gay movements if those movements attempt to mimic western gay movements”, and described MacMaster as “vile”. The author of the post, “Seham”, told the Guardian by email that he used a pseudonym to retain his anonymity “given my work on Palestinian issues”. In response, “Miriam Umm Ibni” wrote: “MacMaster, misguided though he may have been in his actions, _did_ [sic] highlight real issues … He misguidedly placed himself in the guise of an Arab woman but he did so from real compassion. “He is (or was) a real ally (though considering how so-called progressives are calling for his blood I wouldn’t be shocked if he’s turning into a rightwinger).” After MacMaster’s exposure, a second supposedly lesbian blogger , “Paula Brooks”, founder of the US site LezGetReal.com, was revealed also to be a man. Last week, MacMaster updated the Gay Girl blog with a post entitled: “That kinda sucks: Not that anyone cares.” Gay rights Syria Blogging Esther Addley guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

I don’t know if Karl is this stupid or is being purposefully obtuse. All I can tell you is that I am positive that he’s not nearly as politically savvy as Republicans insist he is . With the 2012 elections drawing ever nearer, Karl Rove has made his prediction official: no matter who wins the Republican primary, Barack Obama is losing. On [Friday evening's] O’Reilly Factor, host Juan Williams tried to remind Rove that the Republican field is weak, at best, but received only an earful as to why President Obama is a failure with no chance of winning another four years in the White House.[..] Williams continued to attempt to get Rove to cede that the Republican field was weak, which resulted in much barely-coherent cross-talk, thought which Williams finally made the point that each Republican candidate is severely flawed. “How do you recover if you are Mitt Romney and you have health care? How do you recover if you are Tim Pawlenty and nobody knows you? How do you recover if you are Michele Bachmann and everybody thinks you’re an extremist?” Rove compared them all to President Obama himself, an “obscure senator from Illinois who did diddly squat in the Senate.” That’s the best he’s got? Really? Re-hashing tired 2008 talking points about his Senate record and pinning hopes on a poll more than eighteen months out on a generic Republican instead of the clown car crop of candidates currently vying for the Republican nomination? C’mon, Karl. That’s lame, even coming from you.

Continue reading …
Heatwave to end with a bang as thunderstorms predicted

Forecasters expect Monday to be hottest day of the year but for heavy rains to drown out the sunshine Thunderstorms are to bring the short-lived heatwave to an abrupt finish on Monday evening, forecasters warn. Sunday is the hottest day of the year, with temperatures rising above 28C. And although Monday will see the mercury tipping as much as 30C, by evening the hot weather could be broken by thunder and heavy showers. Paul Mott of MeteoGroup, the weather division of the Press Association, said: “It’s certainly the hottest day of the year – temperatures in St James’s Park in central London reached 28.4C (83.1F). “And tomorrow the weather will get even hotter, at least in the south-eastern areas of the UK. There will be plenty of sunshine over England and Wales, although the north-west will be a bit cloudier. “But there will be a breakdown in the weather in the evening and on Tuesday, with heavy showers and localised thunder storms spreading east across England. “And by Wednesday the heat wave will definitely be over. If anything it will be a bit colder than average, 20C (68F) in London and down to 15C (59F) elsewhere.” London parks were packed with scantily clad sun worshippers, taking advantage of the blue skies. But those heading to the coast may have been disappointed to find temperatures as low as 15C. In Brighton, beach goers made do with temperatures of 19C (66F), although the mercury will rise to 24C (75F) tomorrow. Andy Murray, first on Centre Court on Monday for a last-16 showdown with Frenchman Richard Gasquet, will be glad to play his match before the weather turns. But despite the occasional threat of showers, Wimbledon is likely to see some prolonged sunny spells throughout the week. On Saturday, the Met Office issued a heat-health alert for the east Midlands, east of England and the south-east, warning of dangers of high temperatures, particularly for the very old, the very young and those with chronic conditions. Weather guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Heatwave to end with a bang as thunderstorms predicted

Forecasters expect Monday to be hottest day of the year but for heavy rains to drown out the sunshine Thunderstorms are to bring the short-lived heatwave to an abrupt finish on Monday evening, forecasters warn. Sunday is the hottest day of the year, with temperatures rising above 28C. And although Monday will see the mercury tipping as much as 30C, by evening the hot weather could be broken by thunder and heavy showers. Paul Mott of MeteoGroup, the weather division of the Press Association, said: “It’s certainly the hottest day of the year – temperatures in St James’s Park in central London reached 28.4C (83.1F). “And tomorrow the weather will get even hotter, at least in the south-eastern areas of the UK. There will be plenty of sunshine over England and Wales, although the north-west will be a bit cloudier. “But there will be a breakdown in the weather in the evening and on Tuesday, with heavy showers and localised thunder storms spreading east across England. “And by Wednesday the heat wave will definitely be over. If anything it will be a bit colder than average, 20C (68F) in London and down to 15C (59F) elsewhere.” London parks were packed with scantily clad sun worshippers, taking advantage of the blue skies. But those heading to the coast may have been disappointed to find temperatures as low as 15C. In Brighton, beach goers made do with temperatures of 19C (66F), although the mercury will rise to 24C (75F) tomorrow. Andy Murray, first on Centre Court on Monday for a last-16 showdown with Frenchman Richard Gasquet, will be glad to play his match before the weather turns. But despite the occasional threat of showers, Wimbledon is likely to see some prolonged sunny spells throughout the week. On Saturday, the Met Office issued a heat-health alert for the east Midlands, east of England and the south-east, warning of dangers of high temperatures, particularly for the very old, the very young and those with chronic conditions. Weather guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Six climbers found dead in French Alps

Bodies found by fellow climber at Neige Cordier peak near Villar d’Arêne in Hautes-Alpes region French police have opened an investigation into the deaths of six climbers killed in an accident in the Alps at the weekend. It is though the climbers were swept off the mountain by an avalanche of snow and rocks in what is one of the worst such incidents in France in recent years. The bodies of the climbers, who were reportedly roped together in two groups, were discovered by an English climber who was following the same route, high in the Alps, on Sunday morning. They were at an altitude of 2,700 metres (8,858ft) on the Neige Cordier peak, near the village of Villar-d’Arène in the Hautes-Alpes region. The area, just south-east of Grenoble in the southern French Alps, is popular with climbers. The victims, whose names and nationalities have not been released, had left an overnight mountain refuge in the village area on Saturday morning, saying they were going to climb the 3,614 metres to the summit. Shortly after they set off, they are believed to have fallen 200 metres into a steep passthat locals said was frequently used by snow-walkers and mountaineers. Although the party had been due to return to an Alpine lodge on Saturday evening, the alarm was not raised when they failed to appear. A mountain rescue team consisting of police, paramedics and doctors, was called when the hiker discovered their bodies at around 9.40am on Sunday. The bodies were flown by helicopter to Villar-d’Arène, where a makeshift morgue was set up. The local mayor, Xavier Cret, who works as a mountain guide, told French journalists: “I am a high mountain guide and I am very familiar with this site. It’s not a particularly difficult area [to climb] but, hypothetically, there could have been [an avalanche of] snow and stones which could have swept away the ropes. “We won’t know until there is an investigation. It’s not a place with a dangerous reputation, and the conditions for climbing were ideal. We are a small village and everyone is extremely distressed.” A spokesman for the mountain rescue service said “all hypotheses are possible”. “They could have been caught up when a snow bridge collapsed, or [in] a fall or an avalanche,” he said. Local guide François Pinatel said the area in the Ecrins Alpine range was known to be dangerous when the snow is heavy and in certain places where there are overhanging rocks. In June 2007, five climbers from the same family died after falling in the same range. France Mountaineering Europe Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …