Committee on Climate Change says making energy companies to insulate empty lofts and walls would cut national emissions Energy companies should be forced to insulate every empty loft and cavity wall in the UK within four years, say the government’s climate change advisers. The independent Committee on Climate Change (CCC) says the measure would boost efforts to cut national carbon emissions; in 2010 the number of loft insulations fell by 30% on the previous year. “The government should state this ambition and energy companies should be on the hook to deliver these emissions reductions,” said David Kennedy, the CCC’s chief executive. The coalition’s government’s ” green deal ” proposals to overhaul ageing and leaky homes and reduce consumer energy bills could be a major part of the UK’s action against global warming, says Kennedy, but must have firm targets to be effective. The committee’s recommendations are often accepted by ministers. In the UK, 10m (43%) of all lofts remain unlagged and 8m houses with cavity walls (42%) have yet to be insulated. Kennedy made his call as the CCC launched its legally requiredannual report on progress in cutting greenhouse gases. It found that people were buying less-polluting cars, but the required improvements in environmentally friendly driving had not materialised. Furthermore, delays in building the first carbon capture and storage demonstration plants and boosting use of public transport were damaging efforts to meet the UK’s legally binding carbon targets, the toughest in the world. Christine McGourty, director of Energy UK, which represents the gas and electricity industry, said: “Energy companies have already made a substantial contribution to improving people’s leaky homes. In the past few years, companies have insulated more than 1.5m cavity walls and more than 2m lofts, helping consumers save up to £260 a year on their bills.” According to the CCC report, the number of professional installations of loft and cavity wall insulation fell by 30% between 2009 and 2010. Kennedy blamed this on a “perverse incentive” in the existing scheme for energy companies to help their customers stop heat leaking from their homes, which meant activity stopped when a certain number had been treated. Electricity and gas providers are currently under fire from regulators and consumer groups, who criticise the scores of confusing price tariffs and recent large price rises. Kennedy acknowledged the risk in asking the companies that sell energy to enable their customers to use less. But he said that risk could be overcome if the scheme was carefully designed. “It is very important that someone is on the hook,” he said. “The experience over four decades is that the free market does not deliver home energy-efficiency measures.” Friends of the Earth campaigner Dave Timms agreed the government’s policies “don’t go far enough or fast enough” to meet carbon targets, adding: “For too long energy firms have made huge profits selling ever-increasing amounts of energy while some people freeze in poorly insulated homes. Forcing energy companies to carry out all the necessary energy efficiency improvements is an attractive idea.” A CCC spokesperson added: “Safeguards are needed to ensure energy companies do not pass through excessive costs. Also, compensatory measures may be needed for fuel-poor households.” The CCC report analyses the changes in the UK’s carbon emissions and found that, when the effects of the recent cold winter and the recession were accounted for, the trend was flat. “We are below the level of the 2008-12 budget because of the very big emissions reduction in 2009 due to the recession , not because we had begun to do things fundamentally differently, and we should not be deceived by that,” said Kennedy. A return to business as usual in the economy would mean the UK would exceed its future carbon targets, because they required a 3% cut every year. Changes to car emissions were rated as “good” in the CCC report, with the average pollution by new vehicles down from 160g of CO 2 /km in 2008 to 144g in 2010. But counteracting that was a slight rise in speeding and the prospect of the speed limit being raised to 80mph , which the CCC said would result in 3.5m extra tonnes of CO 2 being emitted each year. Carbon emissions Climate change Energy efficiency Energy Green building Energy bills Consumer affairs Household bills Energy industry Green politics Green deal Committee on Climate Change Damian Carrington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The “NBC Nightly News” mentioned the corporate jet tax loophole twice in its report concerning Barack Obama's press conference Wednesday. Unfortunately, Brian Williams and Chuck Todd neglected to inform viewers that this loophole was part of the President's stimulus package in 2009 (video follows with commentary): During his over one-hour press conference, the President mentioned the need to close this loophole for the “rich” six times. But as the Associated Press reported in February 2009, this was actually part of that year's stimulus package (h/t Heritage Foundation ): Just a few months after lawmakers scolded auto executives for flying to Washington in private jets, Congress approved a tax break in the stimulus package to help businesses buy their own planes. The incentive — first used to help plane makers recover from the 2001 terror attacks — sharply reduces the up front tax bill for companies who buy assets like business planes. The aviation industry, which is cutting jobs as it suffers from declining shipments and canceled orders, hopes the tax break in the economic-stimulus bill just signed by President Barack Obama will persuade more companies to buy planes and snap a slump in general aviation that began last year. Pretty amazing that the President made a big deal on Wednesday over a tax loophole that he himself thought was a good idea when it was included in his stimulus bill two years ago. Equally absurd was that the “Nightly News” would refer to this tax break twice in its report on the President's press conference without noting the delicious irony. This seems particularly negligent given NBC's fascination with so-called gaffes and hypocrisies associated with Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann. There have been a minimum of three such reports filed by NBC News this week. Yet the current President mockingly proposing to close a tax loophole that he extended and trumpeted shortly after taking office deserved absolutely no mention. As NewsBusters has been cautioning for months, Americans better get used to this kind of duplicitous coverage from Obama's media shills. Until the elections are over, he could probably throw up on a visiting dignitary without it being reported while a Republican presidential candidate sneezing without covering his or her mouth will likely garner the attention of a breast popping out during a Super Bowl halftime show. Maybe even more.
Continue reading …enlarge Looked good on paper, but it did have Cold War written all over it. Click here to view this media One of the most glowing examples of the Cold War was the 100 yard dash on the parts of the U.S. and the Soviet Union to win “hearts and minds” throughout the world during the Post World War 2 reconstruction and Developing Nations period. President Truman first introduced his Point Four Technical Assistance/Foreign Aid program during his Inaugural address. Simply put, it was Truman’s idea to not just throw vast wads of money at the problem, but rather to create a stable environment by introducing American technology and assistance along with a vast array of other goodies in an effort to promote goodwill and well . . . .converts and allies against the Iron Curtain. During his address at the 17th Annual Newspaper Guild Convention, Truman continues making his case for the Point Four Program, which included something of a Freudian slip at this excerpt: President Truman: “Point Four is not new and should not become a matter for partisan differences of opinion. However, some critics have attempted to ridicule Point Four as a “do-good” measure. Others have said it is a waste of money. This is the most foolish kind of short sightedness. We fail to carry out a vigorous Point Four program we run the risk of losing to Communism by default, hundreds of millions of people who now look to us for help against their struggle against hunger and despair. And what we won’t do is to teach these people how to help themselves . Point Four is a successor to the old Colonialsim idea. The exploiting idea of the middle 17th, 18th and 19th centuries. We want to have a prosperous world that’ll be interested in buying the immense amount of surplus things that we’re going to have for sale. In order to do that, they’ve got to have something to give back to us in order that they can buy our goods. I want to keep this factory organization of ours going at full tilt. And in order to do that we must help these people to help themselves.” After a reasonably quick recovery (from “We won’t teach these people how to help themselves” to “We must help these people help themselves”), the speech sailed into a successful conclusion. Carefully pointed out not to be an extension of the Marshall Plan, the Point Four Program was instead set up to cultivate a technical assistance program and it was the first of its kind to be introduced. The program was implemented in October of 1950 and, although modified and discarded in places, remained a cornerstone in Foreign Aid by the U.S. throughout the 1950′s and is now known as the Agency For International Development. So now you know where it got started and who started it.
Continue reading …Pat Buchanan, the King of the Nativists on cable news, went ballistic over the USA-Mexico Gold Cup game last weekend. I watched it too and was booing the U.S. team almost as much as the pro-Mexico fans were, but for much different reasons: County Fair: Noted bigot and MSNBC regular Pat Buchanan has a new column out this morning bemoaning the incivility of soccer fans. Not just any soccer fans, mind you, but the backers of the Mexican national soccer team in their match against Team USA this past weekend for the Gold Cup championship in Pasadena (Mexico won 4-2). As Buchanan sees it, the boos that greeted Team USA from the Mexican soccer fans are proof positive that Mexicans just don’t belong in America: What does this event, in which [ Los Angeles Times sports columnist Bill] Plaschke estimates 80,000 fans in the Rose Bowl could not control their contempt for the U.S. team and for the U.S. national anthem, tell us? We have within our country 12- to 20-million illegal aliens, with Mexico the primary source, and millions of others who may be U.S. citizens but are not truly Americans. As one fan told Plaschke, “I was born in Mexico, and that is where my heart will always be.” Perhaps he should go back there, and let someone take his place who wants to become an American. By 2050, according to Census figures, thanks to illegals crossing over and legalized mass immigration, the number of Hispanics in the U.S.A. will rise from today’s 50 million to 135 million. Say goodbye to Los Angeles. Say goodbye to California. Soccer fans behaving disrespectfully? I’m shocked! Shocked, I say! The USA had a 2-0 lead early in the match and got destroyed the rest of the way. It doesn’t matter if Buchanan knows anything about how fans root for their sports team or how much more nationalistic FIFA Soccer is — it can can turn quickly into riots in OTHER countries, . It’s all just an excuse for him to be a very xenophobic man. See, if Joe Arpaio was in Pasadena, he would have set up tents outside the Rose Bowl and tried to deport 80,000 people. That’s the place where Buchanan lives. It’s ugly and disgusting.
Continue reading …Stephen Colbert brought on Americans for Tax Reform and former Jack Abramoff buddy that somehow managed to escape prosecution to the Colbert Report and asked him about his tax pledge he’s managed to make the majority of Republican lawmakers to sign, and whether he’d allow grandmothers across the country be terrorized or allow higher taxes. Norquist responded by saying that “I think we console our self with the fact that we have pictures.” I’d really be a whole lot happier if this guy was sitting in a jail cell next to his buddy Jack instead of appearing on Comedy Central and still being allowed to do his best to help destroy our economy in America with his stinking purity test on taxes that every Republican in America pretends they have to bow down to.
Continue reading …Stephen Colbert brought on Americans for Tax Reform and former Jack Abramoff buddy that somehow managed to escape prosecution to the Colbert Report and asked him about his tax pledge he’s managed to make the majority of Republican lawmakers to sign, and whether he’d allow grandmothers across the country be terrorized or allow higher taxes. Norquist responded by saying that “I think we console our self with the fact that we have pictures.” I’d really be a whole lot happier if this guy was sitting in a jail cell next to his buddy Jack instead of appearing on Comedy Central and still being allowed to do his best to help destroy our economy in America with his stinking purity test on taxes that every Republican in America pretends they have to bow down to.
Continue reading …Stephen Colbert brought on Americans for Tax Reform and former Jack Abramoff buddy that somehow managed to escape prosecution to the Colbert Report and asked him about his tax pledge he’s managed to make the majority of Republican lawmakers to sign, and whether he’d allow grandmothers across the country be terrorized or allow higher taxes. Norquist responded by saying that “I think we console our self with the fact that we have pictures.” I’d really be a whole lot happier if this guy was sitting in a jail cell next to his buddy Jack instead of appearing on Comedy Central and still being allowed to do his best to help destroy our economy in America with his stinking purity test on taxes that every Republican in America pretends they have to bow down to.
Continue reading …As NewsBusters previously reported , Bill Maher last Friday disgracefully attacked Bristol Palin saying, “The s–t doesn't fall far from the bat.” On Wednesday's “Fox & Friends,” noted psychiatrist Keith Ablow analyzed the behavior of HBO's “Real Time” host concluding that the comedian has a deep-seated hatred of women and absolutely no regard for life (video follows with transcript and commentary): BRIAN KILMEADE, HOST: TV host and comedian Bill Maher on the attack once again. This time attacking Sarah Palin’s daughter Bristol on the release of her new book. (BEGIN VIDE CLIP) BILL MAHER: Bristol claims that the night she lost her virginity, she had accidentally gotten drunk on wine coolers that she didn't know contained alcohol and then — and then blacked out and didn't remember a thing. Oh, the Palins. I'll tell you the s–t doesn't fall far from the bat. Bristol, just admit it, you were horny, and while we're at it, stop claiming that you were on birth control pills that didn't work when you got pregnant. Here's a tip, hon – they're not birth control pills if they're shaped like Fred Flintstone. (END VIDEO CLIP) KILMEADE: All right. Are these attacks called for? What would prompt him to speak that way about a young woman and not about other people? Let’s ask Dr. Keith Ablow, a psychiatrist and Fox News contributor joining us right now from Boston with his reaction. You heard what you could that we couldn't — that we didn't have to bleep out. What's your take? Just a comedian going off trying to get laughs? DOCTOR KEITH ABLOW: No. Look, this guy needs his head examined so it's good that you called me in. Bottom line is here's a guy you have to understand, her book’s called “Not Afraid of Life.” Here's a guy who never saw a life that he didn't question. For euthanasia. For the death penalty. For abortion. This is somebody who is not affiliated with life at all. No children. So you have to look at him and say you know what? Why is he so hostile toward women? He has a deep-seated, it seems, hatred to some extent, of women. Frequents the Playboy mansion. All the girls that he dates, the women he dates, they have to be supermodels. And the bottom line is you really got to wonder is he projecting on to her? KILMEADE: I mean, but the thing that gets me is not so much the attack, it's the hatred that's behind it. I mean, it almost bleeds out of his eyes and ears. ABLOW: Absolutely. KILMEADE: And that's what I'm getting. Also, you factor in his movie, the documentary “Religulous” where he's anti-religion as well. ABLOW: Anti-religion. Don't forget, he said that suicide bombers at 9/11 were more heroic than American servicemen. This is someone very closely affiliated with not loving the birth, not having regard for life and therefore, I would say, having it in for women. He says elsewhere in the tape that basically the way that people are born is that babies drop out of them. He's very much divorced from the beauty of the birth experience. He doesn't say, “Bristol, admit it, you had feelings for this young man.” No, you were horny. See, he wants to think women are sluts. That's his view of the world. Interestingly, his mother who happened to have been Jewish, denied her religion until his teen years. So you wonder what kind of ascendance was in operation in that family. Was the male so far above the female that he's internalized this? KILMEADE: Right, and what does it say about society that this guy is still on the air and gets paid a ton of money to act like this? ABLOW: Has it in for women, doesn't like the notion of birth, embraces death, likes suicide bombers. Very simple. KILMEADE: All right. And doctor, we should charge him for this, because you just gave him a quick diagnosis. Now it's up to him to get treatment. ABLOW: I sent a bill because this could have taken six months. KILMEADE: Making a lot of money because HBO is a pay service. Dr, Keith, thanks so much for joining us from Boston. See you soon. ABLOW: Thanks. This certainly explains the constant attacks on former Alaska governor Sarah Palin and Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-Minnesota). Yet, the bigger picture is indeed what it says about our society that he has a nationally televised program on a premium cable network that people have to pay for. Heaven help us. (H/T RCP )
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Citing his two daughters as examples of people who get it done on time without procrastinating or bringing it down to the last minute, President Obama called out Congress, and Republicans in particular, for failing to make the ‘hard choices’ necessary to establish a framework for deficit reduction and raising the debt ceiling. It frustrates me that the two arguments — revenue/budget issues and the debt ceiling — are being conflated, because one really has nothing to do with the other. However, when you have wingnuts in Congress like Republican Rep. Ron Johnson, who threatened to shut down the Senate if a budget bill doesn’t come to the floor (regardless of whether it could actually pass, mind you), the frame gets distorted this way. It also frustrates me that Democrats, including the President, are allowing Republicans to define that frame. President Obama came out in the beginning with a forceful statement saying that it’s time for Republicans to accept a balanced package of increased revenues blended with spending cuts. The message was pretty clearly stated: Quit holding your breath and behaving like children. At one point in the larger press conference (not the clip above), he said this : “They’re in one week, they’re out one week,” said Obama of Congress. “And then they’re saying Obama needs to step in. I’ve been here.” He repeatedly challenged Republicans to make compromises in order to adopt a truly “balanced approach” to the debt deal; “ Call me naive, but my expectation is leaders are going to lead ,” he said. Ezra Klein believes that this press conference indicates a complete breakdown in the budget discussions: What the two parties are really doing is trying to position themselves politically to survive the consequences of their failure. We don’t yet know if we’ll get to the point where the market will panic, but it could. We’re very likely to get to the point where we have to stop funding certain government services, which could mean as little as delaying payments to military contractors and hospitals or as much as halting Social Security checks. Either way, the public is likely to ignore the political breakdown until the consequences begin. At that point, both parties are hoping they will have framed the debate such that the electorate’s fury falls squarely on the other’s shoulders. That’s what today’s news conference was about. And then there is this: GOP grandstanding on debt limit could jeopardize Social Security payments, money for troops, unemployment checks The President expanded on the dangers of magical thinking around the debt limit; specifically, that it wasn’t that big of a disaster if we defaulted. Transcript follows (via CNN) : Moreover, which bills are we going to decide to pay? These guys have said, “Well, maybe we just pay the interest on — for bondholders.” So are we really going to start paying interest to Chinese who hold treasuries and we’re not going to pay folks their Social Security checks or we’re not going to pay veterans for their disability checks? I mean, which bills — which obligations are we going to say we don’t have to pay? And last point I want to make about this. These are bills that Congress ran up. The money’s been spent. The obligations have been made. So this isn’t — this isn’t a situation — I think the American people have to understand this, this is not a situation where, you know, Congress is going to say, “OK, we won’t — we won’t buy this car or we won’t take this vacation.” They took the vacation. They bought the car. And now they’re saying, “Maybe we don’t have to pay, or we don’t have to pay as fast as we said we were going to,” or — that’s not how responsible families act, and we’re the greatest nation on Earth and we can’t act that way. So this is urgent and it needs to get settled. QUESTION: Is August 2nd a yellow light or a red light? OBAMA: I — I think people should think of — look, I’m the president of the United States and I want to make sure that I am not engaging in scare tactics. And I’ve tried to be responsible and somewhat restrained so that folks don’t get spooked. August 2nd is a very important date and there’s no reason why we can’t get this done now. We know what the — what the options are out there. This is not a technical problem any longer. This is a matter of Congress going ahead and biting the bullet and making some tough decisions. Because we know what the decisions are. We’ve identified what spending cuts are possible. We’ve identified what defense cuts are possible. We’ve identified what health care cuts are possible. We’ve identified what loopholes in the tax code can be closed that would also raise revenue. We’ve identified what the options are. And the question now is, are we going to step up and get this done? And, you know, Malia and Sasha generally finish their homework a day ahead of time. (LAUGHTER) Malia is 13. Sasha’s 10. QUESTION: Impressive. OBAMA: It is impressive. They don’t wait until the night before. They’re not pulling all-nighters. (LAUGHTER) They’re — they’re 13 and 10. (CROSSTALK) OBAMA: You know, Congress can do the same thing. If you know you’ve got to do something, just do it. And — and — and I’ve got to say, I’m very amused when I start hearing comments about, “Well, the president needs to show more leadership on this.” Well, hey, let me tell you something, that after — right after we finished dealing with the government shutdown — averting a government shutdown, I called the leaders here together. I said, “We’ve got to get done — get this gone.” I put Vice President Biden in charge of a process that, by the way, has made real progress. But these guys have met, worked through all the issues. I met with every single caucus for an hour to an hour and a half each: Republican senators, Democratic senators, Republican House, Democratic House. I’ve met with the leaders multiple times. At a certain point, they need to do their job, you know. And so this thing, which is just not on the level, where we have meetings and discussions and we’re working through process, and when they decide they’re not happy with the fact that at some point you’ve got to make a choice, they just all sit back and say, “Well, you know, the president needs to get this done.” They need to do their job. Now’s the time to go ahead and make the tough choices. That’s why they’re called leaders. And I’ve already shown that I’m willing to make some decisions that are very tough and will, you know, give my base of voters further reason to give me a hard time.
Continue reading …Venezuelan president has yet to return to Venezuela after reportedly undergoing emergency surgery in Cuba A meeting of Latin American leaders in Venezuela planned for next month has been cancelled, raising further doubts over the health of the country’s convalescing president, Hugo Chavez. Chavez has yet to return to Venezuela after reportedly undergoing emergency surgery in Cuba on 10 June. But the Venezuelan president had been tipped for a triumphant homecoming at the summit of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, or Celac, on 5 July. The summit, which was to be held on Margarita Island, would have coincided with the 200th anniversary of Venezuela’s independence from Spain. Heads of state, including Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff, Ecuador’s Rafael Correa and Chile’s Sebastián Piñera, had planned to attend. Today, however, senior officials in Venezuela and Brazil confirmed that the meeting would no longer take place. Authorities in Caracas said the meeting had been “postponed” but did not set a new date for the summit. In a statement Venezuela’s foreign ministry said the decision was related to the president’s ongoing treatment. “As is well known to the national and international public opinion, the president of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Commander Hugo Chávez Frías is currently in the midst of a process of recovery and medical treatment,” the statement said. A source in Brazil’s foreign ministry confirmed that his country’s authorities had been informed by Caracas that the meeting would no longer take place. Chavez’s continued absence from Venezuela has led to a flurry of speculation and provoked a bitter row between opposition leaders and chavistas. Allies claim Chavez, 56, is recovering well after operating a pelvic abscess but a series of conspiracy theories have also surfaced, ranging from prostate cancer to death. On Tuesday night Venezuelan state television broadcast images of Chavez, alongside Cuba’s former leader Fidel Castro, reputedly filmed in Havana earlier that day. Commentating on the silent images, Venezuela’s information minister, Andrés Izarra, said: “There we are seeing commander Chávez very dynamic.” Castro and Chavez had been discussing “different current events,” Izarra added. “We see him recovering.” But the images did little to appease furious political opponents who have grown increasingly vocal in their calls for more detailed information about Chavez’s condition. “The nation needs a clear message that will end this national and international speculation, as well as the discomfort and suspicion caused by the mysterious silence,” said Manuel Rosales, an opposition leader who is tipped to run against Chavez next year but is currently in exile in Peru, said in a statement on Monday. Analysts are divided on whether Chavez’s protracted absence will help or hinder him as he prepares for the 2012 presidential elections. “It’s hard to tell what the electoral impact might be, but there is no question that for a country that has become accustomed to seeing and hearing the president all the time, this rule in absentia is certainly shocking for everyone,” said Javier Corrales, a Venezuela expert and professor of political science at Massachusetts’ Amherst College. “The conditions surrounding this absence are as mysterious as the conditions surrounding the time that Fidel Castro, still president of Cuba, went into some kind of medical absence before retiring from the presidency,” Corrales noted. Hugo Chávez Venezuela Tom Phillips guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …