Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 760)
The Pledge of (GOP) Allegiance

enlarge On this 4th of July weekend, I wanted to remind everyone to pause for a moment, put down those Cokes, and join with those other Kochs in reciting our sacred psalm of patriots. So please rise. Hand over heart. Ready. Begin: I pledge allegiance To the Bathtub Of the United Slates of Norquist. And to the Republicans, For which it scams, One Corporation, Under Fraud With Liberty & Tax Cuts for All…. corporate jet-owning billionaires. Happy Birthday #235, Americorp, Inc.!

Continue reading …
The Pledge of (GOP) Allegiance

enlarge On this 4th of July weekend, I wanted to remind everyone to pause for a moment, put down those Cokes, and join with those other Kochs in reciting our sacred psalm of patriots. So please rise. Hand over heart. Ready. Begin: I pledge allegiance To the Bathtub Of the United Slates of Norquist. And to the Republicans, For which it scams, One Corporation, Under Fraud With Liberty & Tax Cuts for All…. corporate jet-owning billionaires. Happy Birthday #235, Americorp, Inc.!

Continue reading …
Gaza flotilla prevented from leaving Greek port

Campaigners accuse Israel of ‘outsourcing’ its blockade as Greek coastguard stops flotilla sailing from Athens Greece has banned all ships in the Gaza-bound “freedom flotilla” from leaving port, dealing a further blow to activists trying to break Israel’s blockade on the Palestinian territory. Greek authorities said an international group of vessels planning to sail from its ports and deliver humanitarian aid to the Gazan population would be stopped, a move that lends the support of Prime Minister George Papandreou’s administration to Israel’s contentious four-year siege of the Gaza Strip. An American boat participating in the flotilla was forced to return to shore after it tried to defy the ban and set sail from Athens on Friday. The Audacity of Hope was turned back by the Greek coastguard. Passengers claim Greek commandos pointed machine guns at those on board to stop the boat reaching open water. Campaigners accused Israel of “outsourcing” its blockade to Greece. “Greece sold its body to the banks and its soul to Israel and the United States,” flotilla activist Dror Feiler told Israeli news outlet Ynet. “I don’t think – I know – that Israel and US pressure caused this.” Hamas also condemned the Greek decision, describing it as “inhumane” and “contrary to international regulations and norms”. The Greek announcement is the latest in a series of setbacks for the organisers of this summer’s flotilla, which comes just over a year after a similar mission ended in the deaths of nine activists following the storming of their boat by Israeli military forces. Participants claim that two of the 10 ships in the flotilla had been sabotaged by Israeli agents – a claim Israel dismissed as “ridiculous”. The Israeli government has described the flotilla as an act of anti-Israeli provocation rather than an attempt to convey much-needed aid to Gaza’s 1.6 million inhabitants, who have lived under an economic blockade since Hamas took control of the territory in June 2007. However, Israel has been embarrassed by the release of an anti-flotilla video which was later exposed as an elaborate hoax, seemingly produced by somebody with government links. Gaza flotilla Gaza Palestinian territories Middle East Israel Greece Europe Jack Shenker guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

So just couple of days ago Amato blogged about MSNBC analyst Pat Buchanan’s recent xenophobic tirade over Team USA’s disheartening soccer loss against Mexico. Well Buchanan’s appalling views are in the news again. Heather then eviscerated Buchanan for defending tax cuts for private jets and pretending poor people do not pay any taxes. Now t he MSNBC analyst (I will keep harping on this phrase, which I will expand a little while later in the post) has now fired off an absurd shot against the supporters of same-sex marriage by writing a column in support of … prejudice. Here is a graf from Buchanan’s latest hateful rambling [Warning: Link goes to WND] : What is the moral basis of the argument that homosexuality is normal, natural and healthy? In recent years, it has been associated with high levels of AIDS and enteric diseases, and from obits in gay newspapers, early death. Where is the successful society where homosexual marriage was normal? Well I guess we can give this guy a little credit for honesty I suppose. He doesn’t hide his bigotry and his latest hateful rambling serves the purpose of reminding everyone the deep strain of conservative prejudice. The question though is why does someone who is so overtly championing bigotry, continue to get a platform at network like MSNBC. What does he bring to the table? I guess MSNBC employs someone like him because he fits the progressive caricature of conservatives. May be his comments generate some buzz, ratings, and heck blogposts like this one. I am sure MSNBC loves segments like the so called “epic battle” between Buchanan and Maddow . Yet, does that justify a network looking the other way, while boosting the profile of someone who is so transparently hateful. I don’t need to go into too much details on Buchanan’s ugly past. Just in recent months he mocked President Barack Obama as “affirmative action all the way” after a birther dust up. Jamison Foser made the case almost a year ago for Buchannan’s departure from MSNBC : Despite a decades-long track record of offensive comments about … well, nearly everybody, Buchanan continues to write columns and appear as a commentator on MSNBC. During his time in public life, Buchanan has defended Adolf Hitler — repeatedly. He has peddled Holocaust denial claims and compared suspected Nazi war criminal John Demjanjuk to Jesus Christ. Buchanan has reminisced fondly about his childhood in segregated Washington, DC, and complained that “Old heroes like … Robert E. Lee are replaced by Dr. King.” He wrote that “integration of blacks and whites” was likely to result in “perpetual friction, as the incapable are placed … side by side with the capable.” Buchanan’s anti-integration views were so hard-core, even Richard Nixon characterized Buchanan’s them as “segregation forever.” When 67 blacks were shot to death by South African police, Buchanan dismissed the massacre as “a few South African whites mistreating a couple of blacks.” In 1989, Buchanan defended Bob Jones University’s ban on interracial dating. 1989! You should read Foser’s entire post if you want to get a refresher on this guy’s past. Yet, Buchanan continues to be employed by MSNBC. MSNBC just did a huge song and dance about suspending Mark Halperin (although as Kos noted there are bigger issues than what Halperin said about the President ). The question every progressives should be wondering how can MSNBC justify keeping such an overt bigot on its payroll, who continues to preach so much hatred. Progressives should ask hosts such as Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O’Donnell whether they feel good about associating themselves with an employer, who continue to look the other way while Buchanan fires off his bigoted ramblings. Just because Buchanan may generate some ratings (and I have not seen any data on that) that doesn’t justify MSNBC’s promotion of individuals who continue to spread so much bigotry and hate. I hope progressive organizations consider putting same pressure on MSNBC, the same way they did on CNN for allowing Lou Dobbs a prominent platform to spread his message of hate. Oh and it will certainly be interesting if Keith Olbermann has anything to say about this.

Continue reading …

Why on earth is Michele Bachmann holding a town hall meeting 1200 miles away from her district — and who paid for it? Did this come out of campaign funds, or her congressional budget? Michele Bachmann, the congressional representative of Minnesota’s sixth district, will be holding a “town hall meeting” at DiGiorgio Campus Center at Winthrop University in Rock Hill on June 29. Nevermind that Winthrop University is roughly 1200 miles away from her district; she’s running for PRESIDENT. Keep in mind that this is not a “meet and greet” or “backyard chat” as her other SC stops are titled, but a “Town Hall Meeting,” where representatives in Congress are giving their ear to citizen concerns about policy. Why in the world is she having such a meeting in Rock Hill, SC, 1200 miles from Washington, Minnesota, where not a single person is expected to have any vested interest in the actions of congress as they effect the sixth district in Minnesota? She’d have to be a real moron to pay for this with anything but campaign cash, so I’ll assume she’s trying to have it both ways: She wants to hold campaign rallies with a thin veneer of official function.

Continue reading …
Clinton dismisses Gaddafi threats over Nato’s air strikes in Libya

US secretary of state says Libyan leader’s warning that he will attack Europe will not deter Nato or affect its air campaign Nato will not be deterred from its military action in Libya by Muammar Gaddafi’s threats to take the war to Europe, the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, has said. Clinton brushed aside Gaddafi’s warning that unless air strikes against his regime stopped, he would retaliate with attacks on civilians in Europe. Speaking in Spain on the last leg of a three-nation European tour, she said: “Instead of issuing threats, he should be putting the wellbeing and interests of his own people first. He should step down from power.” Her comments came as Nato announced it was ramping up airstrikes in the western half of Libya, which is still largely under Gaddafi’s control. Nato said it has destroyed more than 50 military targets in the west of Libya this week. Clinton said the Nato mission to protect Libyan civilians was on track, with pressure mounting on Gaddafi to step down. “The rebels are gaining strength and momentum,” she said. “We need to see this through.” The Libyan leader, facing an international arrest warrant for his brutal response to the rebel uprising, yesterday told a large pro-government rally in Tripoli that “homes, offices and families” in Europe would become military targets if the Nato campaign continued. Speaking alongside Clinton on Saturday, the Spanish foreign minister, Trinidad Jiménez, also pledged that Gaddafi’s threats would not diminish Nato’s resolve: “We will continue exerting the same military and political pressure to protect Libyan citizens from the threat and the use of military violence by Colonel Gaddafi.” Libya Hillary Clinton Muammar Gaddafi Nato Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Africa United States David Batty guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Maria Sharapova v Petra Kvitova – Wimbledon 2011 women’s final live! | Scott Murray

• Email scott.murray@guardian.co.uk with all your thoughts • Press F5 to refresh this page or use our auto-refresher Here they come. A long march through the clubhouse. Both women are given huge sprays of flowers before they take to the court. Kvitova smiles shyly. Sharapova looks stern and serious. Both look nervous as they wait to be announced to Centre Court. And they have a fair old wait before they’re allowed to enter the arena. Which they eventually do, to trademark polite Wimbledon applause. If I’m ranking the flowers, Sharapova’s arrangement looks a bit more varied in colour to me. Kvitova’s bunch is a tad purple heavy. Too many Purple Flowers (purplus indigo flowerum) . Sharapova wins the toss, but strangely allows Kvitova to serve first. Hugely Talented Sports Star In Feet On Ground shock: Kvitova’s just been interviewed on the BBC. A more charming chat you’ll do well to lug in on. Do you like designer gear, she’s asked? “Nah. I like normal clothes, jeans and t-shirt. Sometimes a dress. I don’t want to change, I just want to be like everyone else, I’m nothing special.” The crowd: Increasingly unfunny. The weather: Overcast / sunny. They’ll be out soon to knock up. Play begins at 2pm. And with the dust coming down, the two deserving finalists are Maria Sharapova and Petra Kvitova. The 24-year-old Russian is hot favourite to win her first slam since the Australian Open in 2008 – it would be her second Wimbledon title, after the victory in 2004 which saw her introduce the concept of text messaging to Sue Barker – but the 21-year-old big-hitting left-handed Czech is hotly tipped as a future slam winner. Here’s hoping for a classic tussle to put the cherry on a fine 2011 tournament. You can’t knock the quality of the Ladies Singles this year. The intensity of the fascinating Marion Bartoli. Amazing comebacks for Venus and Serena Williams. Shocking defeats – possibly of the harbinger variety – for Venus and Serena Williams. Promising performances by Plucky Brits® Heather Watson and Laura Robson. The wildcard heroics of Sabine Lisicki. Barry Davies back in the commentary box. The simply astonishing Kimiko Date-Krumm. It’s been a blast . Those who continually knock the women’s game want to take a long hard look at themselves in the mirror. Wimbledon 2011 Wimbledon Maria Sharapova Petra Kvitova Tennis Scott Murray guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Sally Kohn: We Shouldn’t be Negotiating With Ideological Terrorists on Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media The Nation’s Chris Hayes filling in for Lawrence O’Donnell on MSNBC’s The Last Word talked to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Jared Bernstein and the Movement Vision Lab’s Sally Kohn about where things are headed on these debt ceiling negotiations. As Bernstein pointed out, even stalling around with this game of chicken as Republicans are doing can start to have real costs and consequences for our fragile economy with the possibility of interest rates going up if the markets start to get spooked that nothing is going to be done as the deadline moves closer. Sally Kohn I believe, really made some of the best points during the discussion where she noted that the majority of the public does want to see tax increases on the rich and asked why the Democrats are not fighting harder on those issues and what lines in the sand the Democrats should be drawing during these negotiations when the Republicans are acting like “ideological terrorists” who are willing to blow up the economy if they don’t get their way on everything. As Fran and Driftglass pointed out in their podcast this week , Kohn, who regularly appears on Fox but who isn’t what you would consider one of your typical “Fox Democrats” actually wrote a very good article this week which appeared in of all places, Fox’s opinion page on their web site, which you can read here — We Don’t Need to Cut Corporate Taxes, We Need to Raise Them . Both of them agreed that the Democrats need to be calling out the Republicans for their stance on refusing to include additional revenue as part of the agreement and Bernstein explained why that is absolutely necessary as well. BERNSTEIN: Well, the path forward is an ugly one, because the path forward has to be calling, it’s not a bluff, it has to be calling their position. There cannot be a deal without revenue in the deal. If you try to squeeze out a path to budget sustainability or anything like that without revenue, you will have to cut government to the point where it would be unrecognizable. And I’m talking about military, Social Security, you know, health security, retirement security, education, infrastructure, protection for low income people. The reason why revenues have to be part of the deal is not be want things to be balanced or things should be even and we want this and they want that. It’s because without revenue, the pressure on spending is so deep that you will cut the floor out from under this economy. And that is economically suicidal. And sadly, I think that’s exactly what the Republicans want. Hayes asked Kohn what she thought of calling their bluff and expressed his concerns with doing it because as he noted, in times of economic crisis, “working people get screwed.” Kohn suggested we need a campaign where every American is asked to donate some spinal fluid to the Democrats and not “stick a knife in the backs of the middle class.” When asked what calling their bluff meant specifically, Kohn responded. KOHN: Well unfortunately, they’re backing the president into a difficult situation, but I think frankly, the Republicans here, and not all the Republicans, but the extreme right of the Republican Party, are acting like ideological terrorists. They’re literally willing to blow up our economy and the future of our nation to score a few political points. And I think this is the point where the president has to say, look, we don’t negotiate with the ideological terrorists. We’re going to stake a claim here. We’re going to stand for working people and trust that if he does the principled and economically sound thing, the public will be with him, and then know where the real blame lies. I couldn’t agree more but wonder if they’ve already managed to negotiate away with these “ideological terrorists” any chance of that happening with the massive cuts they’ve already agreed to so far. Bernstein followed up by asking where the pressure is from business groups on Republicans to finally get something done and quit playing games. I don’t know how this plays itself out in the end, but watching this kabuki theater as they threaten to destroy what’s left of our economy either with not raising the debt ceiling and these cuts being demanded to do it is wearing really thin right now and that’s about the nicest thing I can say about it, so I’ll leave it at that.

Continue reading …
Jobsworths misusing rules to ban fun at school, says health and safety chief

Agency vows to challenge ‘daft and misguided decisions’ that make playground games, sport and science lessons dull Misguided “jobsworths” are preventing children from enjoying traditional playground games through the over-zealous application of health and safety laws, says the watchdog for the legislation. Judith Hackitt, head of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), accused schools and councils of using health and safety rules to avoid providing activities that might cost money or expose them to being sued. She said children’s play and education had been damaged, with some playgrounds becoming joyless no-go areas, while science lessons had been hampered by bans on practical experiments. Hackitt warned the HSE would challenge bureaucrats who attribute “daft decisions” to ban innocuous activities to safety rules. Warning that “the gloves are off”, she said the rules were wrongly blamed for decisions to make children wear goggles when playing conkers and ban running at a pancake race. “The creeping culture of risk aversion and fear of litigation … puts at risk our children’s education and preparation for adult life,” she told the Telegraph. “Children today are denied – often on spurious health and safety grounds – many of the formative experiences that shaped my generation. Playgrounds have become joyless, for fear of a few cuts and bruises. Science in the classroom is becoming sterile and uninspiring.” She said the problem was not just confined to schools, citing the recent decision to turn off the big screens at Murray Mount in case spectators slipped on the wet grass. The people behind unreasonable rulings were often “well-meaning but misguided jobsworths” who go too far, said Hackitt, adding that many organisations imposed restrictions not out of concern for people’s safety but due to fears of no-win no-fee lawsuits for personal injury. Other bodies used the guidance as a cynical excuse to cut services, she added. Her comments came as the education secretary, Michael Gove, announced an overhaul of the red tape required for children to go on school trips, which he said would mean a “more common-sense approach to health and safety”. The Department for Education, along with the HSE, is publishing new guidelines for parents and teachers in England, which it hopes will mean more children go on school trips. The department has cut its 150 pages of health and safety guidelines to eight, and directed schools and local authorities to ditch “unnecessary paperwork”. Paul Tombs, head of education at insurers Zurich Municipal, said only 3% of local authority personal injury claims related to educational activities. He said: “We therefore consider that any public perception and fear over a lack of available insurance cover, or a perceived rise in premiums for these activities, is unfounded.” Health Schools Education policy Health policy Public services policy School sports School trips David Batty guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Charities threaten legal action over benefits cuts for disabled

Coalition of 270 groups may seek judicial review claiming welfare cuts ignore impact and breach equality law The government faces a legal challenge from charities over its plans to cut benefits for disabled people by more than £2bn. The Disability Alliance has warned the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) that it will take legal action to obtain a judicial review of ministers’ plans to replace Disability Living Allowance . The alliance, a coalition of 270 disability charities, said ministers had not properly assessed the negative impact of the benefit cuts, adding that the reforms did not comply with the Equality Act. It has issued a “letter of claim” to the DWP calling for it to demonstrate that it has fulfilled its legal obligations to properly analyse the impact of welfare reforms on disabled people. If the department does not comply, the letter also warns that ministers face legal action. Neil Coyle, Disability Alliance director of policy, said the government may be in breach of both domestic and European legislation, including its responsibilities under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. “We are giving formal notice that unless the concerns that disabled people have legitimately raised are addressed in the context of the Welfare reform bill, there is a strong legal case,” Coyle told the BBC. “Our legal advice … is that the government may be in breach of both domestic and European legislation if it fails to consider the impact on disabled people of the plans to cut £2.17bn from DLA expenditure.” The alliance contends the government’s welfare reform bill will disproportionately disadvantage disabled people and their families. Among its main concerns are proposals to abolish the care component of DLA at the lowest rate of just under £20 a week, which is received by 652,000 people, and to end mobility support for disabled care home residents, without clarifying how the impact of this loss in support would be mitigated for the 78,000 disabled people affected or their families. Coyle said disability charities were threatening to take legal action because the government had ignored the concerns they raised in the formal consultation on the welfare reform bill, which ended in February. Coyle said more than half of the disabled people who use the DLA to support them in work, they say they would have to give up their job if the benefit was cut. “For many disabled people, it helps to pay for an adapted vehicle, so if you can’t afford to run a vehicle, and that’s what you’re using DLA for, there’s a strong chance you won’t be able to continue in work. “One in seven disabled people have been telling us that without DLA they won’t be able to manage their health condition or impairment, and they’re more likely to have hospitalised periods, which cost far more to the taxpayer than paying, for example, £19.55 a week, which is the bit of the DLA expenditure the government is targeting for ending.” The DWP said: “We are following the usual processes and are working with disability organisations on DLA reforms, including with the design of the assessment. “It is premature to talk about a judicial review as the regulations do not go through until 2012.” Disability Charities Voluntary sector Welfare Public services policy Conservatives Liberal Democrats Liberal-Conservative coalition Equality Equality Act 2010 David Batty guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …