Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 757)
Thai exit polls signal redshirt landslide

General election victory for Puea Thai party would mark spectacular comeback for fugitive tycoon Thaksin Shinawatra Thailand’s Puea Thai opposition party is poised for a landslide victory in Sunday’s general election, according to exit polls. If correct they mark a spectacular comeback for Thaksin Shinawatra, toppled as the country’s leader by a military coup in 2006. The party is led by his youngest sister Yingluck – who would be the country’s first female prime minister – but is his in all but name. He lives in exile in Dubai, due to a conviction for abuse of power. The electoral commission is expected to release unofficial results later this evening. Political experts say that exit polls are unreliable but today’s indicate a clear majority for Puea Thai. Analysts have warned that the election could lead to further turmoil in Thailand after six years of intense political conflict. Last year more than 90 people died in clashes as the military cracked down on Thaksin-supporting redshirt protesters in the centre of the capital. Redshirt leaders have warned they will take to the streets again if the 44-year-old Yingluck wins the vote but does not become prime minister. They have said they fear that opponents could attempt to mount a legal challenge against her, or even another coup. Britain was among the countries warning its nationals of potential violence, urging visitors to avoid demonstrations. Thaksin, a billionaire ex-telecoms tycoon, is a polarising figure in Thailand. The rural poor regard him as a champion but urban elites condemn him as corrupt and autocratic. Yingluck said her brother had phoned her to congratulate and encourage her, Reuters reported. She added: “He told me that there is still much hard work ahead of us.” Puea Thai leaders have repeatedly indicated they plan an amnesty allowing Thaksin to return to Thailand without having to serve a jail sentence, though his sister claimed it was not a priority and that such a policy would not be aimed at helping one person. In a telephone interview, Thaksin told the Thai PBS television station: “I have wanted to come back since yesterday, but I do not want to create problems.” The party is well aware that such a move could galvanise its opponents into taking action against them. A spokesman for the incumbent Democrat party said: “Let’s wait for the official results before we can comment. But let’s be assured that everyone will respect the poll results.” Prime minister Abhisit Vejjajiva refused to comment as he arrived at the party headquarters. Puea Thai was on course to gain 313 of the 500 parliamentary seats, according to a poll by Bangkok’s Suan Dusit University, with the Democrats trailing with just 152. A Sri Pathum University exit poll gave Puea Thai 299 seats to the Democrats’ 132. Exit polls in Thailand are considered unreliable. But political analyst Chris Baker said: “If it’s that high [313 seats] for Puea Thai I think you can safely say they are going to win a pretty smacking victory. What has tended to happen in the past is that the exit polls have tended to be fairly conservative.” Professor Thitinan Pongsudhirak said that a margin of 80 to 100 seats should give Puea Thai an unassailable victory. If they won over 250 seats it would be a clear mandate, while more than 280 seats could be considered a landslide. “If they win at all it’s a big statement,” he added. “[It means] the ideas and policies that made [Thaksin's] original Thai Rak Thai party so electable are unstoppable and indestructible … This is a party that has been dissolved twice; its leading politicians have been banned twice; it’s being led by a deposed exile and former prime minister a six-hour flight away.” He said that a landslide would be “not just any landslide – it would mean we have a truly new country. Whether people accept that will determine how much pain and grief we have to go through.” The forecasts were released as polls closed at 3pm on Sunday. Police said more than 170,000 officers were on duty throughout the country to monitor voting by 47 million eligible Thais. Puea Thai commanded a clear lead in polls during the campaign, but analysts have warned an inconclusive result could lead to a lengthy period of horse-trading with minor parties attempting to cut deals with either side. Thailand Thaksin Shinawatra Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Hezbollah leader refuses to hand over Hariri suspects

Hassan Nasrallah defies UN-backed tribunal’s arrest warrants for four Hezbollah members wanted for 2005 assassination Hezbollah’s leader has vowed never to turn over four members of his Shia militant group who have been indicted in the 2005 murder of the former Lebanese prime minister, Rafik Hariri. In a defiant speech, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah said that “even in 300 years” authorities will not be able to touch them. In his first comments since the indictments were announced Thursday , he promised that the country would not see a new “civil war” linked to the findings of the UN-backed tribunal. But Saturday’s assurance came with a tacit warning that peace in Lebanon depends on the government not pushing ahead with the arrests. Nasrallah also denounced the six-year investigation as a plot by Israel and the US and said it was “an aggression against us and our holy warriors”. Bursts of celebratory gunfire and fireworks erupted in Beirut immediately after Nasrallah’s comments. Hezbollah, which gets crucial support from Iran and Syria, has denied any role in the killing. The accusations that Hezbollah – the most powerful political and military force in Lebanon – had a role in the 2005 Beirut truck bombing that killed Hariri threatens to plunge the country into a new and violent crisis. Nasrallah, however, sought to allay such fears and said “there will be no civil war in Lebanon”. “This is because there is a responsible government in Lebanon that will not act with revenge,” he added. Hezbollah has amassed growing political clout in the government this year, having toppled the previous administration in January when then-prime minister Saad Hariri refused to renounce the tribunal investigating his father’s death. The new prime minister, Najib Miqati, who was Hezbollah’s pick for the post, issued a vague promise on Thursday that Lebanon would respect international resolutions as long as they did not threaten the civil peace. The ambiguous wording leaves ample room to brush aside the arrest warrants if street battles are looming. The cabinet is packed with Hezbollah allies, so there is little enthusiasm within the current leadership to press forward with the case. Even if Saad Hariri were still in power, however, it’s unlikely he would be able to force Lebanese authorities to arrest the men to do so– they would have to directly confront a well-armed militant group that wields serious power over the Lebanese state. The bombing that killed Hariri and 22 other people in February 2005 was one of the most dramatic political assassinations in the Middle East. A billionaire businessman, Hariri was Lebanon’s most prominent politician after the 15-year civil war ended in 1990. In the six years since his death, the investigation has sharpened some of Lebanon’s most intractable issues: the role of Hezbollah and its massive arsenal, and the country’s history of sectarian divisions and violence. Lebanon Global terrorism Middle East guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Royals heckled by protesters in Montreal

After adulatory crowds in Ottawa, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s tour of Canada enters tricky phase in Quebec The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge faced the first organised protests against their visit to Canada within minutes of their arrival in Montreal on Saturday night. Demonstrators held up placards denouncing the couple as “parasites” as they arrived at the world renowned Sainte-Justine university hospital. They were heavily outnumbered by others who had come out to cheer the royal couple, but one of the protest organisers, Guillaume Martin, told reporters: “We think the monarchy is something from the middle ages and we don’t want to pay for the trip.” The Canadian government, which is meeting the bill, says that the extra cost equivalent to £950,000 amounts to only a few cents a head for the country’s entire population. The couple ignored the demonstration and spent more than an hour chatting to child cancer patients inside the hospital. Sunday promises to be more fraught when the royal party moves on to Quebec City, the heart of the long-established separatist movement, where more protests are planned. Royal visitors have had an uncertain welcome in Quebec province – where more than 80% of the population speak French – in recent decades. The Queen has not returned to Quebec city since protesters turned their backs on her and booed in 1964, and two years ago Prince Charles and Camilla were held up by scuffles between demonstrators and police as they visited Montreal. Radical young protesters from the Quebec Resistance Network have called for a demonstration outside the city hall, though they have promised it will be peaceful. Patrick Bourgeois, leader of the network, said the separatists want to send a message “that the monarchy is not welcome in Quebec”. Prince William has emphasised Canada’s bilingualism and dual identity – “Bonne fête, Canada, happy birthday,” he exclaimed in a speech. The visit to Quebec province is a sign that the authorities believe their appearance there will be a success. In a recent poll, more than half of those questioned described themselves as excited by the prospect of seeing them. During the first two days of their tour in Ottawa, the royal couple have been greeted by huge and adulatory crowds. More than 300,000 people were estimated to have crowded around the capital’s Parliament Hill during the Canada Day celebrations on Friday, many of them travelling for hours and some sleeping out to catch a glimpse of the prince and his bride. Although the duchess has not visited Canada before, her husband has stressed her links to the country where he recalled that her grandfather had trained as a pilot in Alberta during the second world war. The Queen has visited Canada more frequently than any other country: 22 times, most recently last year. The royal couple on Saturday went through the near-obligatory tree-planting ceremony at the governor-general’s residence – a Canadian hemlock. They later met military veterans and members of the war brides association at the Canadian war museum – nearly 45,000 young British and European women emigrated to the country after the second world war. Canada Prince William Monarchy Kate Middleton Stephen Bates guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Saturday Night Funny Video: Confusing the Weather Woman with Rudolph Hess

Last Saturday night I introduced my new Saturday night humor posting drawn from the clips Bret Baier runs at the end of FNC’s Special Report which he selects from video montages picked up from the late night comedy shows. Tonight, the second edition, taken from NBC’s Tonight Show , of some pretty funny confusion on a British newscast which played the wrong soundbites at the wrong time — turning an unidentified blonde woman, and the network’s own weather woman, into the Nazi leader Rudolph Hess. Watch below the jump for what Baier played on his Monday, June 27 program. If you missed it, check out last week’s inaugural installment of my Saturday Night Funny Video: “‘ ObamaCare,’ ‘ObamaCare,’ ‘ObamaCare,’ ‘ObamaCare,’ Then Herman Cain… ”

Continue reading …
Open Thread with The Professional Left Weekly Podcast: Bachmann’s Brain

enlarge Credit: The Professional Left Time for your weekly podcast with The Professional Left, otherwise known as our own Driftglass and Bluegal. Links for this podcast include: Scott Simon’s “Windy City” Romney’s “unemployment” ad problem . FOX NEWS.Com calls for higher corporate taxes . You can listen to the archives or make a donation to help keep these going at http://professionalleft.blogspot.com/ . Have a wonderful holiday weekend everyone and enjoy the podcast.

Continue reading …
Do July 4th Parades Turn Kids into Republicans?

All that fireworks-watching, flag-waving and potato salad-eating this weekend could in fact lead to a vote for the Republican party for your child. And the stats from Harvard back up the claim. When children were exposed at a young age to the Americana fanfare associated with the Fourth of July, they were more likely to

Continue reading …
July 1, 1973 – New Month – Old Mayhem.

enlarge Credit: Life Magazine John Dean – aka: Mr. “There’s A Cancer On The Presidency”. Click here to view this media So July started off with a bang in 1973. First was a threatened Constitutional Crisis over the bombings of Cambodia. It was agreed the bombing would end in August, but Nixon also wanted to keep his options open and so he threatened a Veto to the measure and it threw Congress into a state of near chaos. Keeping the nickname “Tricky” alive even as focus was down the hall. The little matter of Watergate resumed with John Dean giving his historic bomb-strewn testimony. But by the end of the week he concluded that he “hoped the President is forgiven”. Meanwhile, it was suggested President Nixon be called on to testify himself, but that drew a vigorous “ain’t gonna happen” from the White House. The whole matter of bugging was on everyone’s minds, with even freshly resigned former Attorney General Richard Kleindienst expressing shock and outrage that even he had his phone conversations bugged. The irony wasn’t lost on anyone, but it did produce a few chuckles. World-wise, Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev concluded his summit talks in Washington and was asked if he and Nixon discussed Watergate which was met with a sharp and somewhat perplexed “no”. China trumpeted success in their first test of a Hydrogen Bomb, letting the world know. And in return the world became just a bit more nervous. In South America a military coup in Chile against the Allende government failed due to alleged lack of support from the Military. But that wasn’t going to be the last, not by a long shot. And a Military Attache at the Israeli Embassy in Washington was gunned down by “unknown assailants”. And so went this particular July 1st in 1973 as reported by Stuart Novins on the CBS Radio program The World This Week.

Continue reading …
Wha…? Maddow Describes Unanimous Senate Votes to Confirm Petraeus and Panetta as ‘Controversial’

Controversy ain't what it used to be, not at MSNBC. The network's Rachel Maddow cited two odd examples of what she deems controversial on her show Thursday, in the first and only time both examples will ever be cited as controversial (video after page break) — In the midst of this partisanship so extreme that it has become quite literally pointless, today in the United States Senate there was a vote on one of the most controversial things in American politics and government and the final tally of that vote in the Senate, look, 94 to zero. Had six senators not missed that vote, dollars to doughnuts, I'm telling you it would have been 100 to nothing. This was a show of bipartisanship not seen in Washington on any matter since nine days ago when there was in fact a 100 to nothing vote on something, something that was as big a deal, as controversial and frankly as unpopular with the public. Nine days ago it was the head of the CIA, Leon Panetta, getting unanimously confirmed to become the new head of the Pentagon. Now today, it was one of the top generals at the Pentagon getting unanimously confirmed to be the new head of the CIA. So, you know, just swap hats you guys. Am I missing something here? Every single senator present to vote on Petraeus's confirmation to CIA does so, the only exceptions being those not actually on Capitol Hill when the vote is taken — and this constitutes “one of the most controversial things in American politics and government”? Just in case you were wondering if this was a fluke on Maddow's part, she doubles down. Not only was Petraeus's confirmation vote “controversial,” so was Panetta's for defense nine days earlier, and this was just as “unpopular with the public,” Maddow assures us. She clearly remembers how it was all the buzz that day at 30 Rock and everyone was in vigorous agreement, a sure sign something is controversial. Why, there hasn't been such controversy from a unanimous Senate vote since the declaration of war against Japan after that alleged attack on Pearl Harbor. In the remainder of the segment (which can be seen in its entirety here ), Maddow talked about growing opposition to the war in Afghanistan, which appears to have accelerated since bin Laden was killed, and drone strikes extending into Somalia. What she does here is conflate controversy over the widening breadth of American involvement in conflict abroad with indisputable non-controversy over confirmation votes for Panetta and Petraeus. How would Maddow describe votes where the tallies were nine-to-one instead of 100 percent — super-duper controversial? Toxic partisanship isn't the only thing “quite literally pointless” these days. So was this analysis by Maddow.

Continue reading …
Rupert Grint on the end of Ron Weasley: ‘It’s like grieving’ – interview

For more than half Rupert Grint’s 23 years, he has had another existence as Ron Weasley, Harry Potter’s comedy sidekick. As the final film in the series is released, where to now for the number-two boy wizard? Rupert Grint describes it as like watching a row of dominoes falling towards you, and when we emerge from a cellar bar in central London, climbing up to street-level Soho, it’s clear he’s caught it just right. A few strides in the direction of his hotel and a face among a group of outdoor lunchers flinches in recognition, prompting other heads to turn and look. Quickly a chipper twentysomething is bounding across the road, dodging motorbikes, his cameraphone outstretched as if it’s something Grint has mislaid. “Would you mind, Rupert, if we?” I’m sure this happens to other people with famous faces, but does it happen to quite such a degree? Grint’s co-star in the Harry Potter film franchise – the boy wizard himself, Daniel Radcliffe – is widely agreed to have the most recognisable face in the world, and is accordingly pitied for it. But Grint appears on all the bus-stop posters too. Grint has also been acting in this seemingly endless series of films, adapted from JK Rowling’s books, since 2000. The 23-year-old’s face has been reproduced a billion times on all the lampshades and Lego boxes and stationery sets and “edible cake toppers”. Radcliffe gets harassed wherever he goes but he gets to be Harry, the hero with a tragic backstory and a dozen glamour moments per film. It has been Grint’s lot to play the abiding best mate, Ron Weasley – on screen about as often as Harry but mainly there to chatter his teeth (cowardly foil to his friend’s breezy grit), or say “bloody hell” (Ron’s the defeatist, working-class one), or get injured, because nary does a film complete without Grint requiring medical treatment. He’s the comedy sidekick who, by my count, waited 400 minutes, well into the third film, before he got his first properly funny line. And still he has to deal with the domino-topple of faces everywhere he goes, the suicide dashes for photos. “I wouldn’t normally ask,” says the twentysomething in Soho, and soon he’s got Grint in a tight clutch, posing with a finger pointed to say, “Look what I found!” Grint used to quite like going to music festivals, but people there started finding him in the crowd and wordlessly hoisting him up for display. Picture requests are nothing, a breeze, compared to being presented like a weighty fishing catch at a festival, and when we round a corner and Grint is asked to pause for another picture he’s already extending an arm and readying a photo smile before the request is out. We’ve walked less than 100 metres. How does this guy get anywhere? He must have to add half-again to every planned journey, put aside long weekends to get around the supermarket. “I wouldn’t normally ask,” says the second fan just like the first, and there’s probably something revealing here. Grint is loose limbed, almost groggy on this June afternoon. There’s an easy roll to his 5ft 11in, a nonchalance I’ve come to know well during my hour or so with him, and his eyes under a hanging fringe are a quarter shut. He looks approachable. Actually he looks muggable, and you’d worry about him getting fleeced all the time if he didn’t habitually, daydreamingly, leave his wallet and keys at home. Once he got all the way to Paris before noticing he’d not brought a suitcase, and had to go out and buy himself emergency clothes. That hanging fringe might be some effort towards anonymity. It’s long enough that with careful brushing he could cover the upper half of his face if he wanted, and that might become necessary when the latest and last Harry Potter film, somewhat clunkily titled Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part Two , comes out in cinemas this month. Images of Grint, as well as those of co-stars Radcliffe and Emma Watson, are already plastered on nearby bus-stops in anticipation. “You can spot it from 50 feet away,” he tells me in the Soho cellar bar, “someone recognising you. And then you watch it build. I do miss it, sometimes, the invisibility. Being able to get round Tesco. Not meet anyone who wants to take a picture with you. It’s manageable but it’s just, like, constant.” At least neither picture-taker calls him Ron. That happens, he says, quite a lot. “I answer to it. I turn around to it in the street.” That’s not going to stop people doing it, I tell him, as he slowly swings a leg on to the couch and folds it underneath himself, to sit cross legged. “I know! I can’t help it.” He stifles a yawn. Daniel Radcliffe has said that is is “very, very hard to hate Rupert Grint” but he has also pointed out that you could set the man on fire and he wouldn’t definitely flinch. “Any slower and he’d be in reverse,” his close friend James Phelps, who plays Grint’s onscreen brother Fred in the films, tells me. “Nothing fazes him,” says Matt Lewis, a fellow wizard called Neville in the franchise. “Rupert wears his fame lightly,” Potter producer David Heyman explains, “and is very laid-back. It’s not like I’d say he’s warm, exactly. He’s just a good, decent person. Not unctuous. Not obsequious.” And not a big one for confessions. “He isn’t the type to call you up with a problem, no,” says Phelps. Grint is sweet and personable, happy to put up with oft-asked questions about a franchise that has taken up more of his life, now, than it has not. He is even civil when I press about money and girls, and transcribing the recording of our chat later on is a breeze – once I work out to get “Yeah, sort of, um” copied and ready to paste. But it occurs to me, somewhere around Grint’s 30th use of this last construction, that it might be serving as a sort of Rowling-esque spell. Yersortovum : to repel the intended devastation of an interviewer’s careful questions. With Grint you have to ask, and ask, and ask the same thing, to shake him from languor and from his reliance on dusty answers that have seen him through interviews for years. Take this. I want to know his impressions of Radcliffe, on first meeting him, aged 11. Grint’s a year older and anyone who can remember life as a pre-teen will remember what an impossible chasm of time and gathered wisdom that seemed. What did he think of the squitty little 10-year-old, cast opposite him? Grint starts talking about how exciting everything was at the time. He applied for the part on a whim… But what did you think, I repeat – perhaps when you first shook hands? Did you size him up? Grint considers. He yeah-sort-of-ums. What was the very first thing that occurred to you? And then, finally, he sniffs up a laugh, tickled by buried memory. “I remember thinking,” says Grint, grinning brilliantly, “that this guy has a really triangular-shaped head.” Imagine being 11 and auditioning for the school play. You get the part – high fives – then that school play is rehearsed, performed, expanded, performed again, again, again, all the while discussed at quite some length, until you are 23 years old . Grint (the eldest boy in a large family, his unusual forename picked by fun-loving parents from a hat) had been in school plays. He had played Rumpel in Rumpelstiltskin and a fish in Noah’s Ark . “…and so had every kid who’d ever done a school play we met.” So said the director of the first two Harry Potter films, Chris Columbus, hardly exaggerating. His search for child actors was so extensive it quickly moved beyond talent agencies and drama schools to include open pleas in the trade press (“…Must be a redhead…”) and a casting call on the children’s news programme Newsround . Grint saw this, one afternoon in 1999, and sent in an application “on a whim. I’d already won a Ron Weasley lookalike competition in a newspaper so I thought I had a chance.” Dad Nigel, a memorabilia dealer, and mum Jo, a housewife, filmed Grint doing a rap about how right he’d be in the role, and they sent in the tape. “Chris Columbus said that to a degree when you cast the kids you cast the parents,” producer Heyman tells me. Columbus had directed the kids’ film Home Alone some years before, starring the child actor Macaulay Culkin. There was an understanding that the ensuing varied traumas of the Culkin family (child-parent divorce proceedings, for instance) must be avoided. “The Grints are incredibly close, and they put a real emphasis on having a good time,” says Heyman. “They’re very chilled, no nonsense.” Grint calls his dad “Nige”, says co-star Lewis, “and has done for as long as I can remember. That’s Rupert’s way.” Grint’s first screen test with Radcliffe and Emma Watson , watched now on YouTube, is telling. He’s the only one of the three who remembers to act when he’s not speaking lines, for a start, and he reaches a glorious peak of dramatic effort when Watson, as girl wizard Hermione, reads from a book about an ancient piece of magic that is supposed to prevent death. Beside her Grint – frowning and baffled, then eyebrows up to consider it properly, then a quick, approving nod – suggests all of man’s complicated feelings towards immortality. I tell Grint is was a tour de force, beyond his years, etc. He laughs and parries. “I’ve also seen footage of Dan and Emma with another potential Ron. He was really good. I’d have picked him.” By the beginning of 2000, Grint, Radcliffe and Watson were in a field in north Yorkshire, shooting early scenes for Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone . Radcliffe has recalled an upbeat Grint dreaming up a pretend radio interview to entertain them all between takes. “At that age you’re fearless,” says Grint. “Nothing bothers you.” Witness footage of him at a press conference, convened to unveil the young actors to the world for the first time. Grint says all the right things (“I think I’m scarily like my character”) and cracks jokes (“Speaking as a wizard…”). He owns the room. “It was the first time any of these kids had been exposed to the voracious press,” remembers Heyman, “and they were voracious. Somebody asked him, ‘So, Rupert, how much are you making?’ A really sensitive question to ask a 12-year-old boy.” Unfazed, Grint made a reference to Rowling’s text, quipping that he didn’t understand talk of “Muggle” (non-magical) money. “It wasn’t rehearsed,” says Heyman. “He was just very quick, very droll. He’s quite selfless, Rupert, any jokes he makes are rarely to draw attention to himself. They’re always about deflecting.” When the gang were making the sequel, 2002′s Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets , something began to change. You can see the beginnings of it in an American TV interview, recorded shortly after the New York premiere of Philosopher’s Stone . Newscaster Katie Couric, fingers pinched in an asking-the-tough-questions pose, asks Grint: “In your very objective way, I’m sure you won’t be, but tell me what you think of the film.” He looks blank for a moment, and you can almost see the first, formative “yeah-sort-of-um” form on his lips. “There comes an awkward stage when you’re growing up,” he says now, “when you’re just really aware of yourself, and quite self-conscious. And I did kind of pull back a little bit.” Radcliffe responded to the attention by becoming talkative, a deliberate charmer. “Dan over time became more confident, the quick-witted one,” says Heyman. “Rupert would never show off in any way.” When I ask Grint at what age he felt himself begin to withdraw into himself, he answers: “Four, I guess? Three or four.” I scramble through my notes. Four ? He should’ve been at home in Hertfordshire, learning lines for Noah’s Ark… But of course he means the films. Grint dates his age by the films. First shave: four. First time journalists started asking him about girls: five. “You measure your life that way,” he says. “I don’t want it to sound like it wasn’t enjoyable, it was. Just sometimes hard to keep track.” It’s my suspicion – as Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) bled into Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) bled into Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) bled into Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009) – that the stuff also got rather less fun to film for Grint. His character, Ron, takes on an increasingly reactive role, always there in a scene but mostly to puff out his cheek , or shake his head, or raise an eyebrow. “There were a few times when it would get quite boring. And you’d want this or that film to just end.” There’s a scene in Order of the Phoenix when characters in the foreground talk about Ron’s father being “mortally wounded”. In the background Grint puffs out his cheeks, shakes his head, and raises an eyebrow. He wasn’t at the top of his game that day. Yet he has been consistently picked out, by critics and co-stars, as the best actor among the franchise’s young stars. John Hurt, who appeared in the first film, identified him as the “born actor”. Alfonso Cuarón, who directed the third, predicted for him the most storied career. Just last month Tom Felton (the villain Draco Malfoy in every instalment) suggested Grint was the most irreplaceable on set, “a comedic genius”. The final Potter film, everyone tells me, will give the actor a long-awaited chance to stretch himself again. Ron gets grievously wounded, naturally (his arm torn open by a baddie’s spell) but he also rides a broomstick through a burning building, and says take-charge lines like “We can end this!”, and weeps over a dead family member. “He has quite a few emotionally charged scenes,” says Phelps, “and I wouldn’t be surprised if he steals the show.” Lewis says: “Me and Dan have spoken about it and we both agreed, we can see Rupert going on and working the longest out of everyone.” So, Rupert, how much are you making? However crass, it’s difficult not to wonder when the laid-back dude in front of you could unblinkingly buy the bar in which you’re sitting. Scoop up, no doubt, a tidy chunk of the surrounding real estate as well. “It’s something I really, um, get, like, kind of… It doesn’t motivate me. My dad handles all that.” Grint clears his throat and shifts a little straighter in his seat. “I don’t even know how much it is.” The compilers of those icky annual rich lists claim to know, and put it at £28m in total earnings. Grint has a flat in east London and also owns an estate near his parents Hertfordshire home, said to be worth around £5m. “The first thing you see is a mini-lake in his front garden, with a swan-shaped pedalo in the middle of it,” says Lewis. “He’s got a five-a-side football pitch. I think he built a mini ice-rink recently. Rupert’s just one of those people who’ll think of something ridiculous he can buy and go and do it.” Considering a list of his purchases over the years you do get the sense of somebody spending to the loose, incautious end of spontaneous fun. He likes cars, and owns a bright orange Range Rover, a Mini fitted with special Lamborghini doors, a working ice-cream van, and a hovercraft. He went through a unicycle phase, a banjo phase, a Japanese gadget phase, and once bought a coin-operated fairground fortune-telling machine. In recent months he splashed on two miniature donkeys. To go with his miniature pigs. “I do, kind of, spend a lot,” Grint says. “And just on stupid things. Because I don’t really know what to do. What are you supposed to do? Um. It just seems like way too much. We don’t deserve it, at all, for what we do.” I’m not sure this is completely true. He deserves a few mil, surely, to offset the years and years of questions about his on-screen relationship with Emma Watson. Briefly, in plot terms, it’s clear from the off that Ron and Hermione share a frisson; but it takes seven long films for them to grow up, get it together, and kiss. A gestation, I suggest to Grint, that must have felt like some kind of medieval betrothal – nervously eyeing each other up, knowing romance would eventually be expected. He chuckles politely but quickly looks a lot sleepier at the mention of the subject. Nothing comes up more often in conversation, he says, also stating with pleasing honesty and not a little understatement: “It can be hard to keep up the energy.” Of the long-awaited kiss – it finally happens in the new film – Grint says, “Such a small, small moment. Yeah, that’s going to be a bit of an anticlimax.” And just like that, a decade of slow burn anticipation is casually swatted. Grint has always managed to avoid questions about any real-life girlfriends in a similarly offhand way. Yeah, sort of, maybe. Not, um, yet. He once suggested that he might have more time for girls once filming had finished on Potter . Well? “Um,” he says. “I’m not sure that I really want it at the moment.” Any close shaves? “I don’t know. I’ve always been open for it to happen. But it’s never been something that I’ve felt I’ve needed.” Four days after our meeting, anyway, a Sunday tabloid reports that Grint is in a relationship with an actress called Georgia Groome, star of 2008 film Angus, Thongs and Perfect Snogging . Maybe Grint was the fibber, maybe the tabloid; “a close pal” is the story’s source. In Soho Grint tells me he’s never suffered a kiss-and-tell, but when I ask if he feels at risk of it he says: “Yeah. I do think about that. It’s always in the back of your head. Not so much kiss and tell. Just the trusting. With anyone, even with friends. You’ve got to think of what people’s intentions are.” The thought of being sold out must make him angry, I say. “I can’t remember the last time I got angry,” he says. “He lived his teenage years under a spotlight,” says Heyman, “but one of the many things I love about Rupert is that he just gets on with it. He enjoys life.” Lewis agrees. “He’d rather focus on all the fun stuff he can do than talk about anything too serious.” And it’s with fun stuff, in the Soho bar, that we start to round up our chat. Grint tells me about a tortoise-like gadget of his that he rediscovered, buried deep in a corner of his dressing room, when filming was finished and he had to clear out. He also unearthed birthday cards that were eight or nine years out of date, the dressing room having been his home away from home since the millennium. “It felt like packing up on the last day of school,” he says. I’d heard that everyone – cast, crew, caterers – had spent this last day bawling. I take a guess, and say: you were the only one who didn’t cry, right? “At first,” he says. “And I wasn’t expecting to. But…” He lets himself think about it. “It was when I saw Dan crying.” He shakes his head. “Then it really hit me. I’d never seen him that upset. It was just really, really raw.” The Potter cast have since scattered. Radcliffe, the extravagant one, is performing in a Broadway play. Watson, the clever one studied history in the US. And the easygoing one? He shrugs. He’ll keep acting. He’s done a couple of films already, post- Potter , roles as an assassin’s apprentice in Wild Target and as an ill-behaved leisure centre employee in Cherrybomb . This latter film featured the memorable sight of Grint snorting cocaine and having sex. Critics didn’t love either, much, but they picked out Grint for praise. “Confirms he has the acting chops for the long haul,” wrote Time Out of Cherrybomb . “Looks set for better things.” Quieter things, too, I hope. Grint says that getting used to Potter being over has been “like grieving”, but when the hubbub around this last film dulls he should, at last, be able to move around in public a little more freely. Perhaps start to go to music festivals again. Phelps told me that, last year, when Grint and he were on a road trip around Europe, Grint was stopped for photographs even in a remote hamlet way up in the Alps. Recently, some wag posted a video on YouTube showing Grint being harassed, one night, by a bunch of drunks. “Garn,” says one of them, encouraging his mates, “show Ron Weasley yer willy.” Grint has made many millions since getting a part in Harry Potter , but it wasn’t all in payment for the acting. Phelps told me a story about a time, not long ago, when Grint came to to visit him in his hometown. None of Phelps’s friends were greatly interested in Potter and one bloke, plonking down on a neighbouring stool in the pub, asked Grint what job he did on the films. I can picture, perfectly, the grateful, graceful shrug he must have given when replying, oh, nothing. He was just part of the crew. Rupert Grint Harry Potter Harry Potter JK Rowling Daniel Radcliffe Emma Watson Alfonso Cuarón Family Science fiction and fantasy Tom Lamont guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Twitter Town Hall Won’t Limit President Obama’s Answers

The askers will be beholden to Twitter’s strict 140-character limit. But the commander-in-chief will be his usual loquacious self. That’s because Obama won’t be typing his responses. The town hall, while touted as an online event, will be hosted just as any normal president does any normal town hall. The president will be in front

Continue reading …